三种碳基电极材料的电化学性质对比研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100841

物理化学学报 >> 2010, Vol. 26 >> Issue (09): 2405-2409.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100841

三种碳基电极材料的电化学性质对比研究

周艳丽¹, 只金芳², 张向飞¹, 徐茂田¹

1. 商丘师范学院化学系,河南商丘476000;
2. 中国科学院理化技术研究所, 中国科学院光化学转换与功能材料重点实验室,北京100190

收稿日期:2010-04-18 修回日期:2010-05-18 发布日期:2010-09-02
通讯作者: 周艳丽, 徐茂田 E-mail:xumaotian@sqnc.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(20775047),河南省科技厅国际合作项目基金(084300510075)和商丘师范学院青年基金(009QN08)资助

Comparative Study of Electrochemical Performances of Three Carbon-Based ElectrodeMaterials

ZHOU Yan-Li¹, ZHI Jin-Fang², ZHANG Xiang-Fei¹, XU Mao-Tian¹

1. Department of Chemistry, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu 476000, Henan Province, P. R. China;
2. Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, P. R. China

Received:2010-04-18 Revised:2010-05-18 Published:2010-09-02
Contact: ZHOU Yan-Li, XU Mao-Tian E-mail:xumaotian@sqnc.edu.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20775047), International Cooperative Project Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Henan Province, China (084300510075), and Youth Foundation of Shangqiu Normal University, China (009QN08).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对硼掺杂纳米金刚石(BDND), 硼掺杂微米金刚石(BDMD)和玻碳(GC)电极的电化学性质做了对比研究. 利用扫描电子显微镜表征了BDMD 和BDND电极, 其表面粒子大小分别为1-5 μm 和20-100 nm. 利用Raman 光谱对两种金刚石薄膜的成分进行了表征,结果表明利用热丝化学气相沉积法得到了高质量的BDND 和BDMD 薄膜. 采用0.5 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄溶液测定了三种电极的电化学窗口, BDND 和BDMD 电极的电化学窗口分别为 3.3 和3.0 V,远比GC电极(2.5 V)的要宽. [Fe(CN)₆]³-/[Fe(CN)₆]⁴-溶液的循环伏安和交流阻抗测定表明,在BDND、 BDMD 和GC 电极上的峰间距(ΔEp)分别为73、92 和112 mV, 且其电子传递电阻(R_et)分别为(98依5)、(260依19)和 (400依25)Ω. 我们也研究了0.1 mmol·L^-1双酚A 在三种电极上的电化学氧化行为. 上述的电化学测定结果表明, 两种金刚石电极均比GC电极表现出了更宽的电化学窗口、更好的电化学可逆性质、更快的电子传递速度和更高的电化学稳定性, 更为重要的是与BDMD 相比BDND 的电化学性质有进一步的提高.

关键词: 电化学性质, 硼掺杂纳米金刚石, 硼掺杂微米金刚石, 玻碳, 电极

Abstract:

The electrochemical properties of three carbon-based electrodes including boron-doped nanocrystalline diamond (BDND), boron-doped microcrystalline diamond (BDMD), and glassy carbon (GC) were compared. We used scanning electron microscopy to characterize the two diamond electrodes and the grain sizes of the BDMD and BDND films were 1-5 μm and 20-100 nm, respectively. The phase composition was characterized by Raman spectroscopy and high-quality BDMD and BDND films were formed by hot-filament chemical vapor deposition. Cyclic votammograms for 0.5 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄ showed that the potential windows for the BDND and BDMD electrodes were 3.3 and 3.0 V, respectively. The potential windows were much wider than that of the GC electrode (2.5 V). The cyclic voltammograms and Nyquist plots of the impedance measurements for [Fe(CN)₆]³-/[Fe(CN)₆]⁴- show peak to peak separations (ΔE_p) of 73, 92, and 112 mV and electron transfer resistances (R_et) of (98依5), (260依19), and (400依25) Ωfor the BDND, BDMD, and GC electrodes, respectively. We also investigated the oxidation of 0.1 mmol·L-1 bisphenol A (BPA) on the three carbon-based electrodes. The above-mentioned electrochemical results reveal that the two diamond electrodes have wider potential windows, better reversibility, faster electron transfer, and higher stability than the GC electrode. Additionally, the BDND electrode shows better electrochemical properties than the BDMD electrode.

Key words: Electrochemical property, Boron-doped nanocrystalline diamond, Boron-doped microcrystalline diamond, Glassy carbon, Electrode

MSC2000:

O646

周艳丽, 只金芳, 张向飞, 徐茂田. 三种碳基电极材料的电化学性质对比研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(09): 2405-2409.

ZHOU Yan-Li, ZHI Jin-Fang, ZHANG Xiang-Fei, XU Mao-Tian. Comparative Study of Electrochemical Performances of Three Carbon-Based ElectrodeMaterials[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2010, 26(09): 2405-2409.

参考文献

1. McCreery, R. L. Chem. Rev., 2008, 108: 2646
2. Wang, Y. R.; Hu, P.; Liang, Q. L.; Luo, G. A.; Wang, Y. M. Chin. J. Anal. Chem., 2008, 36: 1011 [王月荣,胡坪, 梁琼麟, 罗国安,王义明. 分析化学, 2008, 36: 1011]
3. Chen, P. H.; Fryling, M. A.; McCreery, R. L. Anal. Chem., 1995, 67: 3115
4. Wang, J.; Musameh, M.; Mo, J. W. Anal. Chem., 2006, 78: 7044
5. Hermans, A.; Seipel, A. T.; Miller, C. E.; Wightman, R. M. Langmuir, 2006, 22: 1964
6. L俟, Y. F.; Yin, Y. J.; Wu, P.; Cai, C. X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2007, 23: 5 [吕亚芬, 印亚静,吴萍,蔡称心.物理化学学报, 2007, 23: 5]
7. Zhang, B.; Adams, K. L.; Luber, S. J.; Eves, D. J.; Heien, M.; Ewing, A. G. Anal. Chem., 2008, 80: 1394
8. Zhi, J. F.; Tian, R. H. Prog. Chem., 2005, 17: 55 [只金芳, 田如海.化学进展, 2005, 17: 55]
9. Granger, M. C.; Witek, M.; Xu, J.;Wang, J.; Hupert, M.; Hanks, A.; Koppang, M. D.; Butler, J. E.; Lucazeau, G.; Mermoux, M.; Strojek, J. W.; Swain, G. M. Anal. Chem., 2000, 72: 3793
10. Tatsuma, T.; Mori, H.; Fujishima, A. Anal. Chem., 2000, 72: 2919
11. Compton, R. G.; Foord, J. S.; Marken, F. Electroanalysis, 2003, 15: 1349
12. Swain, G. M.; Ramesham, R. Anal. Chem., 1993, 65: 345
13. Zhou, Y. L.; Zhi, J. F.; Zou, Y. S.; Zhang,W. J.; Lee, S. T. Anal. Chem., 2008, 80: 4141
14. Wilson, N. R.; Clewes, S. L.; Newton, M. E.; Unwin, P. R.; MacPherson, J. V. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110: 5639
15. Barnard, A. S.; Sternberg, M. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110: 19307
16. Zhang, Y.; Yoshihara, S.; Shirakashi, T.; Kyomen, T. Diamond Relat. Mater., 2005, 14: 213
17. Fischer, A. E.; Show, Y.; Swain, G. M. Anal. Chem., 2004, 76: 2553
18. Duo, I.; Fujishima, A.; Comninellis, C. Electrochem. Commun., 2003, 5: 695
19. Bennett, J. A.;Wang, J.; Show, Y.; Swain, G. M. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2004, 151: E306
20. Show, Y.; Witek, M. A.; Sonthalia, P.; Swain, G. M. Chem. Mater., 2003, 15: 879
21. Prawer, S.; Nugent, K. W.; Jamieson, D. N.; Orwa, J. O.; Bursill, L. A.; Peng, J. L. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2000, 332: 93
22. Chen, Q.; Gruen, D. M.; Krauss, A. R.; Corrigan, T. D.;Witek, M.; Swain, G. M. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2001, 148: E44
23. Niwa, O.; Jia, J.; Sato, Y.; Kato, D.; Kurita, R.; Maruyama, K.; Suzuki, K.; Hirono, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128: 7144
24. Jia, J.; Kato, D.; Kurita, R.; Sato, Y.; Maruyama, K.; Suzuki, K.; Hirono, S.; Ando, T.; Niwa, O. Anal. Chem., 2007, 79: 98
25. Yin, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ai, S. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2009, 626: 80
26. D'Antuono, A.; Dall'Orto, V. C.; Lo Balbo, A.; Sobral, S.; Rezzano, I. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2001, 49: 1098

[1]	高敦峰, 魏鹏飞, 李合肥, 林龙, 汪国雄, 包信和. 用于二氧化碳电催化还原的电解器研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(5): 2009021 -0 .
[2]	何一涛, 丁飞, 林立, 王志红, 吕喆, 张耀辉. 电极界面浓差极化对锂金属沉积的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2009001 -0 .
[3]	涂昆芳, 李广, 姜艳霞. 温度对乙醇电催化氧化的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(8): 1906026 -0 .
[4]	田地,卢晓峰,李闱墨,李悦,王策. 静电纺纳米纤维基超级电容器无粘合剂电极材料的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1904056 -0 .
[5]	郭楠楠,张苏,王鲁香,贾殿赠. 植物基多孔炭材料在超级电容器中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1903055 -0 .
[6]	康丽萍,张改妮,白云龙,王焕京,雷志斌,刘宗怀. 二维纳米片层孔洞化策略及组装材料在超级电容器中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1905032 -0 .
[7]	陈尧,陈政. 新碳源制备活性炭和石墨烯及其非等电极电容水系超级电容器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1904025 -0 .
[8]	王易,霍旺晨,袁小亚,张育新. 二氧化锰与二维材料复合应用于超级电容器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1904007 -0 .
[9]	刘文燚,栗林坡,桂秋月,邓伯华,李园园,刘金平. 基于阵列电极的新型混合电容器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1904049 -0 .
[10]	梁旭,贾宇峰,刘宗怀,雷志斌. 碳海绵上电化学沉积Fe₂O₃纳米片及其增强电容性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1903034 -0 .
[11]	陆泽营, 徐声伟, 王昊, 刘军涛, 高飞, 宋轶琳, 谢精玉, 肖桂花, 张禹, 戴玉川, 王云, 曲丽娜, 蔡新霞. 基于微电极阵列的睡眠剥夺大鼠海马区神经电活动检测[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(12): 1907033 -0 .
[12]	李亚民, 王阳, 陈弘达, 王毅军, 刘媛媛, 裴为华. 植入式光电极器件发展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(12): 1912054 -0 .
[13]	单义珠, 封红青, 李舟. 电刺激治疗神经系统损伤疾病：研究进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(12): 2005038 -0 .
[14]	许可, 王晋芬. 基于一维和二维纳米材料的神经界面构筑[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(12): 2003050 -0 .
[15]	谢凡, 奚野, 徐庆达, 刘景全. 面向脑机接口的犹他神经电极技术[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(12): 2003014 -0 .

三种碳基电极材料的电化学性质对比研究

Comparative Study of Electrochemical Performances of Three Carbon-Based ElectrodeMaterials

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0