二面角动力学分析结合Zn2+的淀粉样蛋白Aβ40和Aβ42的多态性特征

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201310302

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

淀粉样蛋白β(Aβ)和金属离子与阿尔茨海默病的发病机理密切相关, 金属离子与Aβ的相互作用如何导致Aβ动力学行为的变化是从分子水平上理解金属离子调控Aβ聚集生成具有细胞毒性的寡聚体的关键问题之一. 利用二面角动力学分析策略, 即结合粗粒度模型分析结合Zn²⁺的Aβ40 (Aβ40-Zn²⁺)和Aβ42 (Aβ42-Zn²⁺)单个二面角的势能分布, 利用二面角主成分分析刻画Aβ40-Zn²⁺和Aβ42-Zn²⁺的二维势能面, 以及应用马尔科夫模型建立Aβ40-Zn²⁺和Aβ42-Zn²⁺构象转变的动态网络. 结果表明: Aβ40-Zn²⁺和Aβ42-Zn²⁺单个二面角的势能分布具有很大的相似程度, 其中由Val²⁴-Gly²⁵-Ser²⁶-Asn²⁷构成的二面角差异最大; Aβ40-Zn²⁺和Aβ42-Zn²⁺的势能面均很平坦, 反映了结合Zn²⁺的Aβ构象转变需要克服的能垒较低, 不同构象处于动态平衡, 呈现多态性的特征;马尔科夫模型进一步揭示了Aβ40-Zn²⁺和Aβ42-Zn²⁺构象转变的动态特征, 由一定相似程度的构象聚类而成的微观状态均处于折叠网络的中转节点, 从动力学上反映了结合Zn²⁺的Aβ构象转变容易发生. 特别的, 与实验结果一致, 发现β折叠结构在含Zn²⁺的Aβ构象中作用微小.

关键词: 淀粉样蛋白β, 金属离子, 多态性, 分子动力学模拟, 马尔科夫模型

Abstract:

Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides and metal ions have been suggested to be associated with the pathogenesis of Alzheimer′s disease. Understanding the interactions between Aβ and metal ions at the molecular level is a key step in investigating the role of metal ions in the aggregation of Aβ to form neurotoxic oligomers. In this paper, dihedral dynamics analyses were used, which combine the potential of mean force (PMF) to calculate the free energies of individual dihedral angles of Zn²⁺-bound Aβ40 (Aβ40-Zn²⁺) and Aβ42 (Aβ42-Zn²⁺) using a coarse-grained model, dihedral principle component analysis to characterize the free energy landscapes of Aβ40-Zn²⁺ and Aβ42-Zn²⁺, and Markov state models to show the dynamic misfolding network of Aβ40-Zn²⁺ and Aβ42-Zn²⁺. Our results show that the dihedral free energies of Zn²⁺-bound Aβ40 and Aβ42 are similar, with significant difference being observed for the dihedral consisting of Val²⁴, Gly²⁵, Ser²⁶, and Asn²⁷ residues. Both free energy landscapes are less rugged, indicating that no high energy barrier has to be crossed for conformational transitions of Aβ. Furthermore, the Markov state model suggests that each microstate containing a number of similar structures serves as a hub in the network, and multiple alternative misfolding pathways are available if that node is blocked, indicating the kinetic feasibility of conformational transitions of Zn²⁺- bound Aβ. In particular, the role of the β-strand structure in the kinetic network is negligible, consistent with the experimental result that little β-strand structure was identified in Zn²⁺-bound Aβ.

Key words: Amyloid β, Metal ion, Polymorphism, Molecular dynamics simulation, Markov state model

MSC2000:

O641

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

单升升, 闫超, 徐亮. 二面角动力学分析结合Zn²⁺的淀粉样蛋白Aβ40和Aβ42的多态性特征[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(12): 2630-2638.

SHAN Sheng-Sheng, YAN Chao, XU Liang. Dihedral Dynamics Analyses of the Polymorphic Properties of Zn²⁺-Bound Amyloid β40 (Aβ40) and β42 (Aβ42)[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2013, 29(12): 2630-2638.

参考文献

(1) Hardy, J.; Selkoe, D. J. Science 2002, 297, 353. doi: 10.1126/science.1072994
(2) Roberson, E. D.; Mucke, L. Science 2006, 314, 781. doi: 10.1126/science.1132813
(3) Bush, A. I. Trends Neurosci. 2003, 26, 207. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00067-5
(4) Jakob-Roetne, R.; Jacobsen, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2009,48, 3030. doi: 10.1002/anie.v48:17
(5) Bush, A. I. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2013, 33 (Suppl 1), S277.
(6) Quist, A.; Doudevski, L.; Lin, H.; Azimova, R.; Ng, D.;Frangione, B.; Kagan, B.; Ghiso, J.; Lal, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 10427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502066102
(7) Jang, H.; Connelly, L.; Arce, F. T.; Ramachandran, S.; Lal, R.;Kagan, B. L.; Nussinov, R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15,8868. doi: 10.1039/c3cp00017f
(8) Rauk, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2698. doi: 10.1039/b807980n
(9) Sgourakis, N. G.; Yan, Y.; McCallum, S. A.;Wang, C.; Garcia,A. E. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 1448. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.093
(10) Yan, Y.;Wang, C. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 364, 853. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.09.046
(11) Bitan, G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 100, 330.
(12) Sánchez, L.; Madurga, S.; Pukala, T.; Vilaseca, M.; López-Iglesias, C.; Robinson, C. V.; Giralt, E.; Carulla, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6505. doi: 10.1021/ja1117123
(13) Zhang, S.; Iwata, K.; Lachenmann, M. J.; Peng, J.W.; Li, S.;Stimson, E. R.; Lu, Y. A.; Felix, A. M.; Maggio, J. E.; Lee, J. P.J. Struct. Biol. 2000, 130, 130. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2000.4288
(14) Morriss-Andrews, A.; Bellesia, G.; Shea, J. E. J. Chem. Phys.2012, 137, 145104. doi: 10.1063/1.4755748
(15) Xu, Y.; Shen, J.; Luo, X.; Zhu,W.; Chen, K.; Ma, J.; Jiang, H.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 5403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501218102
(16) Straub, J. E.; Guevara, J.; Huo, S.; Lee, J. P. Accounts Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 473. doi: 10.1021/ar010031e
(17) Faller, P. ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 2837. doi: 10.1002/cbic.v10:18
(18) Faller, P.; Hureau, C. Dalton Trans. 2009, 1080.
(19) Duce, J. A.; Bush, A. I. Pro.Neurobiol. 2010, 92, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.003
(20) Tõugu, V.; Tiiman, A.; Palumaa, P. Metallomics 2011, 3, 250.doi: 10.1039/c0mt00073f
(21) Miller, Y.; Ma, B.; Nussinov, R. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256,2245. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.12.022
(22) Pithadia, A. S.; Lim, M. H. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 67.doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.01.016
(23) Kepp, K. P. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5193. doi: 10.1021/cr300009x
(24) Xu, L.;Wang, X.; Shan, S.;Wang, X. J. Comput. Chem. 2013,34, 2524. doi: 10.1002/jcc.v34.29
(25) Danielsson, J.; Pierattelli, R.; Banci, L.; Gräslund, A. FEBS J.2007, 274, 46. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05563.x
(26) Drew, S. C.; Barnham, K. J. Accounts Chem. Res. 2011, 44,1146. doi: 10.1021/ar200014u
(27) Zirah, S. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 281, 2151. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504454200
(28) Tsvetkov, P. O.; Kulikova, A. A.; Golovin, A. V.; Tkachev, Y. V.;Archakov, A. I.; Kozin, S. A.; Makarov, A. A. Biophys. J. 2010,99, L84.
(29) Rezaei-Ghaleh, N.; Giller, K.; Becker, S.; Zweckstetter, M.Biophy. J. 2011, 101, 1202. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.06.062
(30) Mithu, V. S.; Sarkar, B.; Bhowmik, D.; Chandrakesan, M.;Maiti, S.; Madhu, P. K. Biophys. J. 2011, 101, 2825. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.023
(31) Yang, M.; Teplow, D. B. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 384, 450. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.039
(32) Sgourakis, N. G.; Merced-Serrano, M.; Boutsidis, C.; Drineas,P.; Du, Z.;Wang, C.; Garcia, A. E. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 405,570. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.015
(33) Chong, S. H.; Ham, S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14,1573. doi: 10.1039/c2cp23326f
(34) Côté, S. B.; Derreumaux, P.; Mousseau, N. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 2584. doi: 10.1021/ct1006967
(35) Côté, S.; Laghaei, R.; Derreumaux, P.; Mousseau, N. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 4043. doi: 10.1021/jp2126366
(36) Wise-Scira, O.; Xu, L.; Kitahara, T.; Perry, G.; Coskuner, O.J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 205101. doi: 10.1063/1.3662490
(37) Lin, Y. S.; Bowman, G. R.; Beauchamp, K. A.; Pande, V. S.Biophys. J. 2012, 102, 315. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.002
(38) Li,W.; Zhang, J.; Su, Y.;Wang, J.; Qin, M.;Wang,W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 13814. doi: 10.1021/jp076213t
(39) Wise-Scira, O.; Xu, L.; Perry, G.; Coskuner, O. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 17, 927. doi: 10.1007/s00775-012-0909-9
(40) Xu, L.; Gao, K.; Bao, C.;Wang, X. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des.2012, 26, 963. doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9588-4
(41) Xu, L.;Wang, X.;Wang, X. Eur. Biophys. J. 2013, 42, 575. doi: 10.1007/s00249-013-0906-0
(42) Miller, Y.; Ma, B.; Nussinov, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.2010, 107, 9490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913114107
(43) Miller, Y.; Ma, B.; Nussinov, R. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4820.doi: 10.1021/cr900377t
(44) Xu, L.;Wang, X.;Wang, X. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013, doi: 10.1021/cn4001445.
(45) Xu, L.; Shan, S.;Wang, X. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 6206.doi: 10.1021/jp403288b
(46) Marrink, S. J.; Tieleman, D. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42,6801. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60093a
(47) Mu, Y.; Nguyen, P. H.; Stock, G. Proteins 2005, 58, 45.
(48) Nguyen, P. H. Proteins 2007, 67, 579. doi: 10.1002/prot.21317
(49) Bowman, G. R.; Beauchamp, K. A.; Boxer, G.; Pande, V. S.J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 131, 124101. doi: 10.1063/1.3216567
(50) Pande, V. S.; Beauchamp, K.; Bowman, G. R. Methods 2010,52, 99. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.06.002
(51) Luhrs, T.; Ritter, C. Adrian, M.; Riek-Loher, D.; Bohrmann, B.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 17342. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506723102
(52) Maiorana, A.; Marino, T.; Minicozzi, V.; Morante, S.; Russo, N.Biophys. Chem. 2013, 182, 86. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2013.07.002
(53) Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.;Simmerling, C. Proteins 2006, 65, 712. doi: 10.1002/prot.v65:3
(54) Onufriev, A.; Bashford, D.; Case, D. A. Proteins 2004, 55, 383.doi: 10.1002/prot.20033
(55) Sugita, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 314, 141. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01123-9
(56) Mitsutake, A.; Sugita, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Biopolymers 2001, 60,96.
(57) Case, D. A.; Darden, T. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; et al. AMBER12; University of California: San Francisco, 2012.
(58) Sippl, M. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 213, 859. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80269-4
(59) Dong, X. Y.; Du,W. J.; Liu, F. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2012,28, 2735. [董晓燕, 都文婕, 刘夫锋. 物理化学学报, 2012,28, 2735.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201207162
(60) Beauchamp, K. A.; Bowman, G. R.; Lane, T. J.; Maibaum, L.;Haque, I. S.; Pande, V. S. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7,3412. doi: 10.1021/ct200463m
(61) Cronkite-Ratcliff, B.; Pande, V. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 950.
(62) Khandogin, J.; Brooks, C. L., III. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.2007, 104, 16880. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt051

[1]	张涛,仇运广,罗启超,程曦,赵丽芬,严昕,彭浡,蒋华良,阳怀宇. 钙离子和镁离子浓度变化对磷脂酰乙醇胺-磷脂酰甘油双分子层膜的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 840-849.
[2]	许谢君,肖兴庆,徐首红,刘洪来. 亮氨酸拉链型脂肽对脂质体温敏性调节的分子模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 598-606.
[3]	吕康杰,彭燕秋,肖丽,陆君涛,庄林. 醇/水混合溶剂中碱性聚合物电解质独特的溶解行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 378-384.
[4]	杨化超,薄拯,帅骁睿,严建华,岑可法. 润湿特性对超级电容器储能动力学的影响机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(2): 200-207.
[5]	陈文琼,关永吉,张晓萍,邓友全. 分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 912-919.
[6]	刘夫锋,范玉波,刘珍,白姝. Z_Aβ3和A_β16-40亲和作用的分子机理解析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1905-1914.
[7]	王子民,郑默,谢勇冰,李晓霞,曾鸣,曹宏斌,郭力. 基于ReaxFF力场的对硝基苯酚臭氧氧化分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1399-1410.
[8]	曹了然,张春煜,张鼎林,楚慧郢,张跃斌,李国辉. 分子动力学模拟技术在生物分子研究中的进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1354-1365.
[9]	陈芳,刘圆圆,王建龙,苏宁宁,李丽洁,陈红春. 混合溶剂对β-HMX结晶形貌影响的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1140-1148.
[10]	陈贻建,周洪涛,葛际江,徐桂英. 双链阴离子表面活性剂1-烷基-癸基磺酸钠在气/液界面聚集行为:分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1214-1222.
[11]	刘青康,宋文平,黄其涛,张广玉,侯珍秀. 热辅助存储磁盘硅掺杂非晶碳薄膜氧化的ReaxFF反应力场分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(12): 2472-2479.
[12]	孙怡然,于飞,马杰. 纳米受限水的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(11): 2173-2183.
[13]	张陶娜,徐雪雯,董亮,谭昭怡,刘春立. 分子动力学方法模拟不同温度下铀酰在叶腊石上的吸附和扩散行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(10): 2013-2021.
[14]	伍绍贵,冯丹. 碱基对在DNA双螺旋链上分离的自由能计算[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(5): 1282-1288.
[15]	刘子瑜,廖琦,靳志强,张磊,张路. 分子动力学模拟电解质对阴非离子表面活性剂界面行为的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(5): 1168-1174.

二面角动力学分析结合Zn²⁺的淀粉样蛋白Aβ40和Aβ42的多态性特征

Dihedral Dynamics Analyses of the Polymorphic Properties of Zn²⁺-Bound Amyloid β40 (Aβ40) and β42 (Aβ42)

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10