溶菌酶蛋白在聚合物防污膜表面的吸附

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201409021

物理化学学报 >> 2014, Vol. 30 >> Issue (11): 2149-2156.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201409021

溶菌酶蛋白在聚合物防污膜表面的吸附

胡立梅^1,2, 蔺存国², 王利², 苑世领¹

1. 山东大学胶体与界面化学教育部重点实验室, 济南 250100;
2. 海洋腐蚀与防护重点实验室, 中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所, 山东青岛 266101

收稿日期:2014-07-31 修回日期:2014-09-02 发布日期:2014-10-30
通讯作者: 苑世领 E-mail:shilingyuan@sdu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(973) (2014CB643305)资助

Lysozyme Protein Adsorbed on Antifouling Polymer Film Surface

HU Li-Mei^1,2, LIN Cun-Guo², WANG Li², YUAN Shi-Ling¹

1. Key Laboratory of Colloid and Interface Chemistry, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China;
2. State Key Laboratory for Marine Corrosion and Protection, Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute LSMRI, Qingdao 266101, Shandong Province, P. R. China

Received:2014-07-31 Revised:2014-09-02 Published:2014-10-30
Contact: YUAN Shi-Ling E-mail:shilingyuan@sdu.edu.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973) (2014CB643305).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用分子动力学模拟方法比较了溶菌酶蛋白在两种典型聚合物防污材料聚乙二醇(PEG)和聚二甲基硅氧烷(PDMS)表面的吸附行为, 在微观上探讨了聚合物膜表面性质对蛋白质吸附的影响. 根据蛋白质与聚合物膜之间的相互作用、能量变化及表面水化层分子的动力学行为, 解释了PEG防污涂层相对于PDMS表面具有更佳防污效果的原因: (1) 相比PDMS涂层, 蛋白质与PEG涂层的结合能量较低, 使其结合更加疏松; (2) 蛋白质吸附到材料表面要克服表面水化层分子引起的能障, PEG表面与水分子之间结合紧密, 结合水难于脱附, 造成蛋白质在其表面的吸附需要克服更高的能量, 不利于蛋白质的吸附.

关键词: 聚乙二醇, 聚二甲基硅氧烷, 防污材料, 分子动力学

Abstract:

Molecular dynamics simulations were used to compare the adsorption behavior of lysozyme on two typical antifouling polymer materials: poly(ethylene) glycol (PEG) and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). The influence of the surface properties of the polymer films on protein adsorption is discussed at the microscale. Based on the interactions, energy changes between the protein and polymer films, and dynamical behavior of the hydration molecules near the polymer film, the reasons why the PEG antifouling coating has a better antifouling effect than the PDMS surface were determined as follows. (1) The lower binding energy between the protein and the PEG coating than between the protein and the PDMS coating makes the protein adsorb weaker on the PEG coating than on the PDMS coating. (2) The protein would adsorb on the film surface when overcoming the energy barrier caused by the hydration layer. Molecular water adsorbs on the PEG surface stronger than on the PDMS surface, and is difficult to desorb. Therefore, the protein needs to overcome a higher energy barrier to adsorb to the PEG surface than to the PDMS surface, and thus it is more difficult for protein to absorb on the PEG surface than on the PDMS surface.

Key words: Poly(ethylene) glycol, Poly(dimethylsiloxane), Antifouling material, Molecular dynamics

MSC2000:

O641

胡立梅, 蔺存国, 王利, 苑世领. 溶菌酶蛋白在聚合物防污膜表面的吸附[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(11): 2149-2156.

HU Li-Mei, LIN Cun-Guo, WANG Li, YUAN Shi-Ling. Lysozyme Protein Adsorbed on Antifouling Polymer Film Surface[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2014, 30(11): 2149-2156.

参考文献

(1) Ostuni, E.; Chapman, R. G.; Holmlin, R. K.; Takayama, S.; Whitesides, G. M. Langmuir 2001, 17, 5605. doi: 10.1021/la010384m
(2) Shen, M. C.; Martinson, L.;Wagner, M. S.; Castner, D. G.; Ratner, B. D.; Horbett, T. A. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2002, 13, 367. doi: 10.1163/156856202320253910
(3) Chambers, L. D.; Stokes, K. R.;Walsh, F. C.;Wood, R. J. Surface and Coatings Technology 2006, 201 (6), 364.
(4) Zheng, J.; Li, L.; Chen, S.; Jiang, S. Langmuir 2004, 20 (20), 8931. doi: 10.1021/la036345n
(5) Cedervall, T.; Lynch, I.; Foy, M.; Berggård, T.; Donnelly, S. C.; Cagney, G.; Dawson, K. A. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2007, 46 (30), 5754.
(6) Aggarwal, P.; Hall, J. B.; McLeland, C. B.; Dobrovolskaia, M. A.; McNeil, S. E. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2009, 61 (6), 428. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.009
(7) Kitano, H.; Sudo, K.; Ichikawa, K.; Ide, M.; Ishihara, K. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2000, 104 (47), 11425. doi: 10.1021/jp000429c
(8) Zheng, H. R.;Wang, X.W.; Lin, X. H.; Geng, Q.; Chen, X.; Dai,W. X.;Wang, X. X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 1764. [郑华荣, 王晓韡, 林霞晖, 耿强, 陈旬, 戴文新, 王绪绪. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28, 1764.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201205112
(9) Lüsse, S.; Arnold, K. Macromolecules 1996, 29 (12), 4251. doi: 10.1021/ma9508616
(10) Wang, Y. Q.;Wang, T.; Su, Y. L.; Peng, F. B.;Wu, H.; Jiang, Z. Y. Langmuir 2005, 21 (25), 11856. doi: 10.1021/la052052d
(11) Zhao,W.; Su, Y.; Li, C.; Shi, Q.; Ning, X.; Jiang, Z. Journal of Membrane Science 2008, 318 (1), 405.
(12) Chen, H.; Yuan, L.; Song,W.;Wu, Z.; Li, D. Progress in Polymer Science 2008, 33 (11), 1059. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.006
(13) Michalkova, A.; Tulyani, S.; Beals, J.; Leszczynski, J. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2012, 18 (1), 239. doi: 10.1007/s00894-011-1058-8
(14) Shen, J.W.;Wu, T.;Wang, Q.; Pan, H. H. Biomaterials 2008, 29 (5), 513. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.016
(15) Bai, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29, 849. [白姝, 李浩, 张麟. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29, 849.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201301182
(16) Fang, Y. Y.; Hu, X. G.; Yu, L.; Li,W. B.; Lin, R. S. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2007, 23, 84. [方盈盈, 胡新根, 于丽, 李文兵, 林瑞森. 物理化学学报, 2007, 23, 84.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20070117
(17) Panos, M.; Sen, T. Z.; Ahunbay, M. G. Langmuir 2012, 28 (34), 12619. doi: 10.1021/la301546v
(18) Schuler, L. D.; Daura, X.; Van Gunsteren,W. F. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2001, 22 (11), 1205.
(19) Van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2005, 26 (16), 1701.
(20) Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; Van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2008, 4 (3), 435. doi: 10.1021/ct700301q
(21) Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Van der Spoel, D. Molecular Modeling Annual 2001, 7 (8), 306.
(22) Essmann, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1995, 103 (19), 8577. doi: 10.1063/1.470117
(23) Berendsen, H. J.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren,W. F.; DiNola, A. R. H. J.; Haak, J. R. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1984, 81 (8), 3684. doi: 10.1063/1.448118
(24) Hess, B.; Bekker, H.; Berendsen, H. J.; Fraaije, J. G. Journal of Computational Chemistry 1997, 18 (12), 1463.
(25) Dismer, F.; Hubbuch, J. Journal of Chromatography A 2007, 1149 (2), 312. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.074
(26) Hower, J. C.; He, Y.; Bernards, M. T.; Jiang, S. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2006, 125 (21), 214704. doi: 10.1063/1.2397681
(27) Vanderah, D. J.; La, H.; Naff, J.; Silin, V.; Rubinson, K. A. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2004, 126 (42), 13639. doi: 10.1021/ja047744n
(28) Shao, Q.; He, Y.; White, A. D.; Jiang, S. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2010, 114 (49), 16625. doi: 10.1021/jp107272n
(29) He, Y.; Hower, J.; Chen, S.; Bernards, M. T.; Chang, Y.; Jiang, S. Langmuir 2008, 24 (18), 10358. doi: 10.1021/la8013046
(30) He, Y.; Chang, Y.; Hower, J. C.; Zheng, J.; Chen, S.; Jiang, S. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2008, 10 (36),5539. doi: 10.1039/b807129b

[1]	张涛,仇运广,罗启超,程曦,赵丽芬,严昕,彭浡,蒋华良,阳怀宇. 钙离子和镁离子浓度变化对磷脂酰乙醇胺-磷脂酰甘油双分子层膜的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 840-849.
[2]	刘海,李毅,马兆侠,周智炫,李俊玲,何远航. 定常冲击波作用下六硝基六氮杂异伍兹烷(CL-20)/奥克托今(HMX)含能共晶初始分解机理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 858-867.
[3]	许谢君,肖兴庆,徐首红,刘洪来. 亮氨酸拉链型脂肽对脂质体温敏性调节的分子模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 598-606.
[4]	吕康杰,彭燕秋,肖丽,陆君涛,庄林. 醇/水混合溶剂中碱性聚合物电解质独特的溶解行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 378-384.
[5]	杨化超,薄拯,帅骁睿,严建华,岑可法. 润湿特性对超级电容器储能动力学的影响机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(2): 200-207.
[6]	陈文琼,关永吉,张晓萍,邓友全. 分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 912-919.
[7]	孙成珍,白博峰. 气体分子在二维石墨烯纳米孔中的选择性渗透特性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(10): 1136-1143.
[8]	柳平英,刘春艳,刘倩,马晶. 含偶氮苯主-客体复合物的光致异构化反应对结合能与几何构象的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(10): 1171-1178.
[9]	辛亮,孙淮. 关于副本交换分子动力学模拟复杂化学反应的研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(10): 1179-1188.
[10]	刘夫锋,范玉波,刘珍,白姝. Z_Aβ3和A_β16-40亲和作用的分子机理解析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1905-1914.
[11]	汪秀秀,赵健伟,余刚. 孔洞和孪晶界对银纳米线形变行为联合影响的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1773-1780.
[12]	王子民,郑默,谢勇冰,李晓霞,曾鸣,曹宏斌,郭力. 基于ReaxFF力场的对硝基苯酚臭氧氧化分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1399-1410.
[13]	曹了然,张春煜,张鼎林,楚慧郢,张跃斌,李国辉. 分子动力学模拟技术在生物分子研究中的进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1354-1365.
[14]	陈芳,刘圆圆,王建龙,苏宁宁,李丽洁,陈红春. 混合溶剂对β-HMX结晶形貌影响的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1140-1148.
[15]	陈贻建,周洪涛,葛际江,徐桂英. 双链阴离子表面活性剂1-烷基-癸基磺酸钠在气/液界面聚集行为:分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1214-1222.

溶菌酶蛋白在聚合物防污膜表面的吸附

Lysozyme Protein Adsorbed on Antifouling Polymer Film Surface

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10