利用基于Gouy-Chapman模型的离子有效电荷定量表征离子特异性效应

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201410231

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

离子特异性效应在固-液界面反应中是普遍存在的. 近期研究指出, 在较低电解质浓度的某些体系中, 离子特异性效应可能并非来源于色散力、经典诱导力、离子半径或水合半径的大小等, 而是界面附近强电场中的离子极化作用. 这种作用可使界面附近的吸附态反号离子被强烈极化(高达经典极化的10⁴倍). 强烈极化的结果将导致离子在界面附近受到的库仑力远远超过离子电荷所能产生的库仑力, 这体现在离子的有效电荷将远大于离子的实际电荷. 因此胶体体系中基于这种强极化的离子有效电荷可以用来定量表征离子特异性效应的强度. 本研究在蒙脱石-胡敏酸混合悬液凝聚过程中发现了Na⁺、K⁺、Ca²⁺、Cu²⁺四种离子的离子特异性效应, 提出了基于激光散射技术测定离子有效电荷的方法, 并成功获得了被强烈极化后的离子有效电荷数值. 实验测得的Na⁺、K⁺、Ca²⁺、Cu²⁺四种离子的有效电荷值分别为: Z_{Na(effective)}=1.46, Z_K(effective)=1.86, Z_{Ca(effective)}=3.92, Z_{Cu(effective)}=6.48.该结果表明: (1) 离子在强电场中的极化将大大提高离子的有效电荷, 从而极大地增强离子所受的库仑作用力;(2) 离子的电子层数越多, 离子极化越强烈, 离子的有效电荷增加越多.

关键词: Hofmeister 效应, 动态光散射, 凝聚动力学, 有效电荷系数, 电场, 非经典极化效应

Abstract:

Specific ion effects have been observed in a wide range of phenomena at solid-liquid interfaces. Recent studies have indicated that the origin of these effects in some relatively low-electrolyte-concentration systems is the ion polarization in the strong electric field near the interface, rather than dispersion forces, classical induction forces, ionic size, or hydration effects. These effects cause the counterions near the interface to become strongly polarized (with a polarization that is nearly ten thousands times stronger than classical polarization). This strong polarization causes that the Coulomb force exerted by the polarized ions near the interface is far greater than the force generated by the ionic charge, which is reflected in the fact that the effective charge number of polarized ions is much larger than their original charge number. We therefore used the effective charge number of strongly polarized cations to quantitatively characterize the strength of specific ion effects in colloid systems. In this study, we observed the strong, specific ion effects of Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cu²⁺ in the montmorillonite-humic acid composite aggregation process. Furthermore, we established a method to calculate the effective charge number of polarized cations based on the critical coagulation concentration (CCC) measured using dynamic light scattering. We successfully obtained the effective charge number of polarized ions. The experimental effective charge numbers for Na⁺, K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Cu²⁺ were Z_{Na(effective)}=1.46, Z_K(effective)=1.86, Z_{Ca(effective)}=3.92, Z_{Cu(effective)}=6.48, respectively. These results showed that the non-classical polarization greatly enhanced the effective charge number of ions, greatly enhancing the Coulomb force exerted by the ions; and that the more electronic layers the ions had and the stronger the ionic polarization, the more the effective charge of ions increased.

Key words: Hofmeister effect, Dynamic light scattering, Aggregation kinetics, Effective charge coefficient, Electric field, Non-classical polarization effect

MSC2000:

O646

高晓丹, 李航, 田锐, 刘新敏, 朱华玲. 利用基于Gouy-Chapman模型的离子有效电荷定量表征离子特异性效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(12): 2272-2282.

GAO Xiao-Dan, LI Hang, TIAN Rui, LIU Xin-Min, ZHU Hua-Ling. Quantitative Characterization of Specific Ion Effects Using an Effective Charge Number Based on the Gouy-Chapman Model[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2014, 30(12): 2272-2282.

参考文献

(1) Lo Nostro, P.; Ninham, B.W. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2286. doi: 10.1021/cr200271j
(2) Hofmeister, F. Archiv für Experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie 1888, 25, 1.
(3) Izutsu, K. I.; Aoyagi, N. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 288, 101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.09.015
(4) Parsons, D. F.; Boström, M.; Nostro, P. L.; Ninham, B.W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 12352. doi: 10.1039/c1cp20538b
(5) Kunz,W.; Lo Nostro, P.; Ninham, B.W. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 9, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.004
(6) Ninham, B.W. Lipid. Polym. -Lipid. Syst. 2002, 120, 1. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45291-5
(7) Tobias, D. J.; Hemminger, J. C. Science 2008, 319, 1197. doi: 10.1126/science.1152799
(8) Yu, Y. X.; Fujimoto, S. Sci. China Chem. 2013, 56, 1735. doi: 10.1007/s11426-013-4959-9
(9) Tielrooij, K.; Garcia-Araez, N.; Bonn, M.; Bakker, H. Science 2010, 328, 1006. doi: 10.1126/science.1183512
(10) Nucci, N. V.; Vanderkooi, J. M. J. Mol. Liq. 2008, 143, 160. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2008.07.010
(11) Yu, Y. X.; Gao, G. H.; Li, Y. G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2000, 173, 23.
(12) Lu, J. F.; Yu, Y. X.; Li, Y. G. Fluid Phase Equilib. 1993, 85, 81. doi: 10.1016/0378-3812(93)80006-9
(13) Peula-García, J. M.; Ortega-Vinuesa, J. L.; Bastos-González, D. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 11133.
(14) Boström, M.;Williams, D. R. M.; Ninham, B.W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 168103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.168103
(15) Ninham, B.W.; Duignan, T. T.; Parsons, D. F. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 16, 612. doi: 10.1016/j. cocis.2011.04.006
(16) Hu, J. H.; Yang, Z. X.; Zheng, Z. Colloid and Interface Chemistry; South China University of Technology Press: Guangzhou, 1997; pp 254-330. [胡纪华, 杨兆禧, 郑忠. 胶体与界面化学. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 1997: 254-330.]
(17) Jin, L.; Yu, Y. X.; Gao, G. H. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 304, 77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.08.046
(18) Liu, X. M.; Li, H.; Du,W.; Tian, R.; Li, R.; Jiang, X. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 6245. doi: 10.1021/jp312682u
(19) Liu, X. M.; Li, H.; Li, R.; Xie, D. T.; Ni, J. P.;Wu, L. S. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5047.
(20) Tian, R.; Yang, G.; Li, H.; Gao, X. D.; Liu, X. M.; Zhu, H. L.; Tang, Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 8828. doi: 10.1039/c3cp54813a
(21) Borukhov, I.; Andelman, D.; Orland, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 435. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.435
(22) Kim, H. K.; Tuite, E.; Nordén, B.; Ninham, B.W. Eur. Phys. J. E 2001, 4, 411. doi: 10.1007/s101890170096
(23) Kanda, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Higashitani, K. Adv. Powder Technol. 2002, 13, 149. doi: 10.1163/156855202760166505
(24) Sheng, N.; Boyce, M. C.; Parks, D. M.; Rutledge, G. C.; Abes, J. I.; Cohen, R. E. Polymer 2004, 45, 487. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.100
(25) Zhu, H. L.; Li, B.; Xiong, H. L.; Li, H.; Jia, M. Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 1225. [朱华玲, 李兵, 熊海灵, 李航, 贾明云. 物理化学学报, 2009, 25, 1225.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20090631
(26) Li, S.; Li, H.; Xu, C. Y.; Huang, X. R.; Xie, D. T.; Ni, J. P. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2013, 77, 1563. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2013.01.0009
(27) Xiong, Y. Soil Colloid, 2nd ed.; Science Press: Beijing, 1985; pp 10-14. [熊毅. 土壤胶体(第二册). 北京: 科学出版社, 1985: 10-14.]
(28) Low, P. F. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44, 667. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400040001x
(29) Liu, X. M.; Li, H.; Li, R.; Tian, R.; Xu, C. Y. Analyst 2013, 138, 1122.
(30) Kuwatsuka, S.;Watanabe, A.; Itoh, K.; Arai, S. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1992, 38, 23. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1992.10416948
(31) Wu, G. F.; Ren, Q.; Tao, Y.; Zhang, H. X. Chin. J. Colloid Polym. 2007, 2, 40. [吴广峰, 任群, 陶悦, 张会轩. 胶体与聚合物, 2007, 2, 40.]
(32) Jia, M. Y.; Li, H.; Zhu, H. L.; Tian, R.; Gao, X. D. J. Soils Sediments 2013, 13, 325. doi: 10.1007/s11368-012-0608-8
(33) Gao, X. D.; Li, H.; Zhu, H. L.; Tian, R. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2012, 49, 698. [高晓丹, 李航, 朱华玲, 田锐. 土壤学报, 2012, 49, 698.]
(34) Noah-Vanhoucke, J.; Geissler, P. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106, 15125. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905168106
(35) Boroudjerdi, H.; Kim, Y.W.; Naji, A.; Netz, R. R.; Schlagberger, X.; Serr, A. Phys. Rep. 2005, 416, 129. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.06.006
(36) Manning, G. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 1506. doi: 10.1021/j150611a011
(37) Stellwagen, E.; Stellwagen, N. C. Biophys. J. 2003, 84, 1855. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74993-5
(38) Logan, E. M.; Pulford, I. D.; Cook, G. T.; Mackenzie, A. B. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 1997, 48, 685. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1997.00123.x
(39) Ducker,W. A.; Senden, T. J.; Pashley, R. M. Langmuir 1992, 8, 1831. doi: 10.1021/la00043a024
(40) Verwey, E. J.W.; Overbeek, J. T. G.; Van Nes, K., Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids: The Interaction of Sol Particles Having an Electric Double Layer; Elsevier: New York, 1948.
(41) Hou, J.; Li, H.; Zhu, H. L.;Wu, L. S. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73, 1658. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0017
(42) Li, H.; Qing, C. L.;Wei, S. Q.; Jiang, X. J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 275, 172. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.12.055
(43) Li, H.; Peng, X. H.;Wu, L. S.; Jia, M. Y.; Zhu, H. L. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 4419. doi: 10.1021/jp808372r
(44) Amal, R.; Coury, J. R.; Raper, J. A.;Walsh,W. P.;Waite, T. D. Colloids Surf. 1990, 46, 1. doi: 10.1016/0166-6622(90)80045-6
(45) Li, T. C.; Kheifets, S.; Medellin, D.; Raizen, M. G. Science 2010, 328, 1673. doi: 10.1126/science.1189403
(46) Uhlenbeck, G. E.; Ornstein, L. S. Phy. Rev. 1930, 36, 823. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.36.823
(47) Wang, K.; Yu, Y. X.; Gao, G. H. Phys. Rev. E 2004, 70, 011912. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.011912
(48) Peng, B.; Yu, Y. X. J. Chem.Phys. 2009, 131, 134703. doi: 10.1063/1.3243873

[1]	林锦亮, 张雅敏, 张浩力. 单分子器件中的新颖静电场效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(12): 2005010 - .
[2]	陈文琼, 关永吉, 张姣, 裴俊捷, 张晓萍, 邓友全. 外电场作用下离子液体振动光谱变化的分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 2001004 - .
[3]	张涛,仇运广,罗启超,程曦,赵丽芬,严昕,彭浡,蒋华良,阳怀宇. 钙离子和镁离子浓度变化对磷脂酰乙醇胺-磷脂酰甘油双分子层膜的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 840 -849 .
[4]	陈文琼,关永吉,张晓萍,邓友全. 分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 912 -919 .
[5]	王榕,段明,熊艳,宋先雨,方申文. 反相破乳剂SP169及DMEA169在溶液中的聚集行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(6): 1482 -1488 .
[6]	谢湖均,刘程程,孙强,顾青,雷群芳,方文军. 季铵盐型阳离子表面活性剂与牛血清白蛋白的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(12): 2951 -2960 .
[7]	丁丹丹, 许旋, 吴子文, 周沃华, 陈蓉, 徐志广. 金属串配合物(n, m)[Cr₃(PhPyF)₄Cl₂](n=2, 3, 4; m=2, 1, 0)的配位结构及其与电场的关系[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(7): 1323 -1330 .
[8]	张相雄, 陈民. 均匀电场对冰晶结构及生长的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(7): 1208 -1214 .
[9]	熊海灵, 杨志敏, 李航. 扩散模型和凝聚模型耦合作用下胶体凝聚动力学的Monte Carlo模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(3): 413 -422 .
[10]	葛振朋, 石彦超, 李晓毅. 径向电场对纳米管中水分子通量的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(08): 1655 -1660 .
[11]	黄燕, 黄晓, 许旋. 电场对金属串配合物M₃(dpa)₄Cl₂ (M=Co, Rh, Ir; dpa=dipyridylamide)结构的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(06): 1225 -1232 .
[12]	葛宋, 陈民. 表面电荷及外电场对液固界面热阻的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(12): 2939 -2943 .
[13]	王银锋, 黄俭根, 周光培, 李志儒. 非对称笼间电子迁移异构体与电场诱导电子迁移[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(11): 2574 -2580 .
[14]	陈洪, 吴晓艳, 叶仲斌, 韩利娟, 罗平亚. 疏水缔合聚丙烯酰胺在盐水中的自组装行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(04): 903 -908 .
[15]	李翌, 邹爱华, 叶汝强, 牟伯中. 表面活性素分子结构对其胶束化行为的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(05): 1128 -1134 .