铜-真空-铜金属隧道结转变电压的理论研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201506112

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用非平衡格林函数与密度泛函理论相结合方法研究了电极表面具有原子级突起的铜-真空-铜隧道结的转变电压.计算结果表明,铜电极真空隧道结的转变电压主要决定于电极表面尖端铜原子4p轨道的局域态密度,因而对电极取向和表面局域原子构型非常敏感.对于电极取向沿(111)方向的铜电极真空隧道结,当电极表面原子级突起取为铜吸附原子和金字塔型铜纳米粒子两种构型时,转变电压的计算值分别约为1.40和2.40 V.当电极取向沿(100)方向时,电极表面原子级突起分别为铜吸附原子和金字塔型铜纳米粒子两种构型的铜电极真空隧道结,其转变电压的差异更为显著.具体而言,电极表面有一金字塔型铜纳米粒子的铜电极真空隧道结的转变电压值减小至1.70 V,而电极表面原子级突起为铜吸附原子的铜电极真空隧道结却因铜吸附原子4p轨道的局域态密度过于扩展,即使在偏压超过1.80 V时仍然没有出现转变电压.这些结果表明转变电压谱可用作分析金属电极真空隧道结电子输运特性的有力工具.

关键词: 真空隧穿, 转变电压谱, 电子输运, 非平衡格林函数, 密度泛函理论

Abstract:

The transition voltage of copper-vacuum-copper tunneling junctions with atomic protrusions on the electrode surface was investigated using the non-equilibrium Green's function formalism combined with density functional theory. Our calculations show that the transition voltages of Cu-vacuum-Cu junctions with atomically sharp electrodes are mainly determined by the local density of state (LDOS) of the 4p atomic orbitals of the protrusion, and are thus sensitive to the electrode orientation and the variation of the atomic configurations of surface protrusions. For Cu-vacuum-Cu junctions with (111)-oriented electrodes, the transition voltages were calculated to be about 1.40 and 2.40 V when the atomic protrusions were chosen to be one Cu adatom or a copper cluster with four atoms arranged in a pyramid configuration, respectively. The transition voltages of Cu-vacuum-Cu junctions with (100)-oriented electrodes were more different. When the atomic protrusion on the Cu(100) surface was a copper cluster with five atoms arranged in a pyramid configuration, the transition voltage was 1.70 V. In contrast, no transition voltage was observed for Cuvacuum-Cu junctions with one Cu adatom attached to the Cu(100) electrode surface even when the bias exceeded 1.80 V, which is caused by the LDOS of the 4p atomic orbitals of the Cu adatom on the Cu(100) surface being too extended. These results demonstrate the advantages of transition voltage spectroscopy as a tool for analyzing the electronic transport properties of metal-vacuum-metal tunneling junctions.

Key words: Vacuum tunneling, Transition voltage spectroscopy, Electron transport, Non-equilibrium Green's function, Density functional theory

MSC2000:

O641

白梅林,王明郎,侯士敏. 铜-真空-铜金属隧道结转变电压的理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(8): 1474-1482.

Mei-Lin. BAI,Ming-Lang. WANG,Shi-Min. HOU. Theoretical Investigation of the Transition Voltages of Cu-Vacuum-Cu Tunneling Junctions[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2015, 31(8): 1474-1482.

参考文献

1	Tao N. J. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 1, 173.
2	Song H. ; Reed M. A. ; Lee T. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1583.
3	Beebe J. M. ; Kim B. ; Gadzuk J. W. ; Frisbie C. D. ; Kushmerick J. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 026801.
4	Beebe, J. M.; Kim, B.; Frisbie, C. D.; Kushmerick, J. G. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 827. doi: 10.1021/nn700424u
5	Liu K. ; Wang X. ; Wang F. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 2315.
6	Pakoulev A.V. ; Burtman V. J.Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 21413.
7	Wang G. ; Kim T. W. ; Jo G. ; Lee T. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5980.
8	Song, H.; Kim, Y.; Jang, Y. H.; Jeong, H.; Reed, M. A.; Lee, T. Nature 2009, 462, 1039. doi: 10.1038/nature08639
9	Tan A. ; Sadat S. ; Reddy P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 013110.
10	Noy G. ; Ophir A. ; Selzer Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2010, 49, 5734.
11	Bennett N. ; Xu G. ; Esdaile L. J. ; Anderson H. L. ; Macdonald J. E. ; Elliott M. Small 2010, 6, 2604.
12	Choi S. H. ; Risko C. ; Delgado M. C. R. ; Kim B. ; Brédas J. L. ; Frisbie C. D. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4358.
13	Song H. ; Kim Y. ; Jeong H. ; Reed M. A. ; Lee T. J.Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 20431.
14	Song H. ; Kim Y. ; Jeong H. ; Reed M. A. ; Lee T. J.Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 102419.
15	Wang G. ; Kim Y. ; Na S. I. ; Kahng Y. H. ; Ku J. ; Park S. ; Jang Y. H. ; Kim D. Y. ; Lee T. J.Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 17979.
16	Xiang D. ; Zhang Y. ; Pyatkov F. ; Offenhäusser A. ; Mayer D. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4760.
17	Guo S. ; Hihath J. ; Díez-Pérez I. ; Tao N. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19189.
18	Ricoeur, G.; Lenfant, S.; Guérin, D.; Vuilanume, D. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 20722. doi: 10.1021/jp305739c
19	Tan A. ; Balachandran J. ; Dunietz B. D. ; Jang S. Y. ; Gavini V. ; Reddy P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 243107.
20	Guo S. ; Zhou G. ; Tao N. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4326.
21	Wang K. ; Hamill J. ; Zhou J. ; Guo C. ; Xu B. Faraday Discuss. 2014, 174, 91.
22	Trouwborst M. L. ; Martin C. A. ; Smit R. H. M. ; Guédon C. M. ; Baart T. A. ; van der Molen S. J. ; van Ruitenbeek J. M. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 614.
23	Sotthewest K. ; Hellenthal C. ; Kumar A. ; Zandvliet H. J. W. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 32438.
24	Bâldea, I. Europhys. Lett. 2012, 98, 17010. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/98/17010
25	Wu K. ; Bai M. ; Sanvito S. ; Hou S. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 025203.
26	Bâldea I. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 33257.
27	Wu K. ; Bai M. ; Sanvito S. Hou. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 014707.
28	Néel N. ; Kröger J. ; Limot L. ; Frederiksen T. ; Brandbyge M. ; Berndt R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 065502.
29	Schull G. ; Frederiksen T. ; Brandbyge M. ; Berndt R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 206803.
30	Schull G. ; Frederiksen T. ; Arnau A. ; Sanchez-Portal D. ; Berndt R. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 23.
31	Caciuc V. ; Lennartz M. C. ; Atodiresei N. ; Tsukamoto S. ; Karthäuser S. ; Blügel S. Phys. Status Solidi B 2013, 250, 2267.
32	Vitali, L.; Wahl, P.; Ohmann, R.; Bork, J.; Zhang, Y.; Diekhöner, L.; Kern, K. Phys. Status Solidi B 2013, 250, 2437. doi: 10.1002/pssb.201349246
33	Meir Y. ; Wingreen N. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 2512.
34	Hohenberg P. ; Kohn W. Phys. Rev 1964, 136, B864.
35	Kohn W. ; Sham L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133.
36	Xue Y. ; Datta S. ; Ratner M. A. Chem. Phys. 2002, 281, 151.
37	Brandbyge M. ; Mozos J. L. ; Ordejón P. ; Taylor J. ; Stokbro K. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65, 165401.
38	Zhang J. ; Hou S. ; Li R. ; Qian Z. ; Han R. ; Shen Z. ; Zhao X. ; Xue Z. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 3057.
39	Li R. ; Zhang J. ; Hou S. ; Qian Z. ; Shen Z. ; Zhao X. ; Xue Z. Chem. Phys. 2007, 336, 127.
40	Rocha A. R. ; Garcia-Suarez V. M. ; Bailey S. W. ; Lambert C. J. ; Ferrer J. ; Sanvito S. Nature Mater. 2005, 4, 335.
41	Rocha A. R. ; García-Suárez V. M. ; Bailey S. ; Lambert C. ; Ferrer J. ; Sanvito S. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 085414.
42	Rungger I. ; Sanvito S. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 035407.
43	Soler J. M. ; Artacho E. ; Gale J. D. ; García A. ; Junquera J. ; Ordejón P. ; Sánchez-Portal D. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 2745.
44	Troullier N. ; Martins J. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993.
45	García-Gil S. ; García A. ; Lorente N. ; Ordejón P. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 075441.
46	Perdew, J.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865.
47	Schwarz F. ; Lörtscher E. J.Phys.: Condens. Matter 2014, 26, 474201.
48	Ludoph, B.; van Ruitenbeek, J. M. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 2273. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.2273
49	Michaelson H. B. J.Appl. Phys. 1977, 48, 4729.
50	Papaconstantopoulos, D. A. Handbook of the Band Structure of Elemental Solids; Plenum Press: New York, 1986.
51	Ke S. H. ; Baranger H. U. ; Yang W. J.Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 114701.
52	Tu. X. ; Wang M. ; Sanvito S. ; Hou S. J.Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 194702.

[1]	王云飞, 刘建华, 于美, 钟锦岩, 周琪森, 邱俊明, 张晓亮. SnO₂表面卤化提高钙钛矿太阳能电池光伏性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 2006030 -0 .
[2]	李诗涵,赵侦超,李世坤,邢友东,张维萍. DFT计算结合固体NMR研究富铝SSZ-13的铝分布和Brønsted酸性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1903021 -0 .
[3]	肖雪珠, 曹小芳, 赵东波, 荣春英, 刘述斌. 运用概念密度泛函理论和信息论方法定量描述胺类分子的分子碱度[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 1906034 -0 .
[4]	黄智超,戴亚中,温晓杰,刘丹,林宇轩,徐珍,裴坚,吴凯. Au(111)表面Verdazyl自由基的构象转换[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1907043 -0 .
[5]	陈强,姜利学,李海方,陈娇娇,赵艳霞,何圣贵. 钒硼双原子阳离子活化甲烷研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1014 -1020 .
[6]	王丹,丁迅雷,廖珩璐,戴佳钰. 单个金或银原子掺杂的氧化钒团簇上的甲烷活化反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1005 -1013 .
[7]	韩萌茹,周亚男,周旋,储伟. 通过g-C₃N₄担载MNi₁₂ (Fe, Co, Cu, Zn)纳米团簇调节甲烷化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 850 -857 .
[8]	赵越,崔佳桐,胡继闯,马嘉璧. VO_1-4⁺阳离子与n-C_mH_2m+2 (m = 3, 5, 7)烷烃的反应性研究：氧含量和碳链长度的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(5): 531 -538 .
[9]	刘南舒,周思,赵纪军. 点缺陷石墨烯的电导[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(10): 1142 -1149 .
[10]	陈熙,张胜利. 基于3d元素掺杂的石墨二炔分子传感材料性能调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(9): 1061 -1073 .
[11]	许文武,高嶷. 巯基保护的中空金纳米球[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(7): 770 -775 .
[12]	卢天,陈沁雪. 通过价层电子密度分析展现分子电子结构[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(5): 503 -513 .
[13]	尹凡华,谭凯. 符合独立五元环规则的C₁₀₀(417)Cl₂₈形成机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 256 -262 .
[14]	钟爱国,李嵘嵘,洪琴,张杰,陈丹. 从能量和信息理论视角理解单取代烷烃的异构化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 303 -313 .
[15]	丁晓琴,丁俊杰,李大禹,潘里,裴承新. 基于概念密度泛函理论磷酸酯类反应性物质毒性预测[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 314 -322 .