VO1-4+阳离子与n-CmH2m+2 (m = 3, 5, 7)烷烃的反应性研究：氧含量和碳链长度的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201805231

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本论文利用飞行时间质谱的实验方法对钒氧阳离子VO_1–4⁺与直链烷烃(n-C_mH_2m+2，m = 3, 5, 7)的反应性进行了系统研究，并且利用密度泛函理论方法对VO_1–3⁺与戊烷的反应进行了理论计算。实验结果表明，在VO⁺，VO₃⁺和VO₄⁺与n-C₅H₁₂反应中，吸附反应为主要的反应通道，同时还伴随着C―H键和C―C键的活化反应。在本实验体系中，VO⁺的反应活性要优于VO₃⁺，而VO₂⁺具有最优的反应活性，可以有效的活化烷烃的C―H键和C―C键生成较轻的烷烃和烯烃。VO₄⁺含有一个η²-O₂单元，由于VO₂⁺和η²-O₂之间的弱相互作用力，在实验中该阳离子经过一定时间的冷却碰撞后会释放η²-O₂单元，并以吸附为主要通道。尽管钒氧阳离子中氧原子的氧化态从VO⁺中的+Ⅲ增加到VO₂⁺中的+Ⅴ和VO₃⁺中的+Ⅳ，其反应性却没有逐渐增加。基于目前的反应性趋势，我们做出推测如果具有更多碳原子的直链烷烃与VO_1–4⁺反应，将会生成更轻的烷烃/烯烃片段。本文中理论计算结果与实验观测结果基本一致。同时，我们的研究可以帮助研究者们理解在凝聚相催化剂表面发生的微观反应过程，从而建立更为完善的催化反应机理。

关键词: 质谱, 钒氧阳离子, 烷烃, 密度泛函理论, 反应机理

Abstract:

Vanadium oxides are one of the most important heterogeneous catalysts that are widely used to oxidize hydrocarbon molecules into value-added chemicals. In order to reveal the mechanisms and the nature of active sites, numerous experimental and theoretical studies have been reported on the reactivities of gas-phase vanadium oxide clusters toward small molecules. However, there has been very limited research on the chemical reactivity changes associated with the oxygen contents of vanadium oxides and the carbon chain lengths of alkanes. In this work, the reactions of vanadium oxide ions VO₁₋₄⁺ with alkanes (n-C_mH_2m+2, m = 3, 5, 7) were systematically investigated by time-of-flight mass spectrometry and the reactions of VO₁₋₃⁺ with pentane were further studied by density functional theory calculations. Experimental results show that in the reactions of VO⁺, VO₃⁺, and VO₄⁺ with n-C₅H₁₂, in addition to the major adsorption processes, the activation of the C―H and C―C bonds of n-C₅H₁₂ was observed. The activation of both the bonds was observed experimentally during the reaction of VO₂⁺ with n-C₅H₁₂ with large branching ratios. Among the vanadium oxide cations studied, VO₂⁺ shows the strongest oxidizability and the generation of lighter alkanes and alkenes dominates the reactions; VO⁺ is more reactive than VO₃⁺. VO₄⁺ pocesses only one η²-O₂ unit. Due to the weak bond between VO₂⁺ and η²-O₂, the η²-O₂ unit is released in VO₄⁺/n-C₅H₁₂ system leading to the formation of VO₂⁺; thus VO₄⁺ cations reflect some reactivity of VO₂⁺. Although the oxidation states in the vanadium oxide clusters increase from +Ⅲ in VO⁺ to +Ⅴ in VO₂⁺ and +Ⅳ in VO₃⁺, the reactivity does not gradually increase. Moreover, the reactivity of the mononuclear vanadium oxide cations also does not exhibit a gradually increasing trend with the increase in oxygen content. Based on the observed reactivity trend, the adsorption channels gradually become weak as the carbon chain lengths increase; meanwhile, the dehydrogenation and C―C bond activation channels gradually become obvious and some oxygen transfer products appear. Therefore, much lighter fragments of alkanes/alkenes will be obtained if linear alkanes with more carbon atoms were reacted with VO₁₋₄⁺. The theoretical results are generally consistent with those obtained from the experiments. The various reaction channels and versatile reactivity of the mononuclear vanadium oxide cations investigated in this study not only offer new insights into gas-phase reactions but also shed light on the processes occurring on the surfaces of the corresponding condensed-phase catalysts.

Key words: Mass spectrometry, Vanadium oxide cations, Alkanes, Density functional theory, Reaction mechanism

MSC2000:

O643

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

赵越,崔佳桐,胡继闯,马嘉璧. VO_1-4⁺阳离子与n-C_mH_2m+2 (m = 3, 5, 7)烷烃的反应性研究：氧含量和碳链长度的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(5): 531-538.

Yue ZHAO,Jiatong CUI,Jichuang HU,Jiabi MA. Reactivities of VO_1–4⁺ Toward n-C_mH_2m+2 (m = 3, 5, 7) as Functions of Oxygen Content and Carbon Chain Length[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(5): 531-538.

参考文献

1	Weckhuysen B. M. ; Keller D. E. Catal. Today 2003, 78, 25.
2	Fierro, J. L. G. Metal Oxides; Taylor & Francis Froup: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006.
3	Dunn J. P. ; Stenger H. G., Jr. ; Wachs I. E. Catal. Today 1999, 51, 301.
4	Li K. T. ; Wu K. S. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 1052.
5	Ba?ares M. A. ; Alemany L. J. ; Granados M. L. ; Faraldos M. ; Fierro J. L. G. Catal. Today 1997, 33, 73.
6	Ertl, G.; Knozinger, H.; Weikamp, J. Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis; Wiley-VCH: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
7	Zambelli T. ; Wintterlin J. ; Trost J. ; Ertl G. Science 1996, 273, 1688.
8	Bell A. T. Science 2003, 299, 1688.
9	Somorjai G. A. ; Mccrea K. R. ; Zhu J. Top. Catal. 2002, 18, 157.
10	Lai X. ; Goodman D. W. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2000, 162, 33.
11	Bell R. C. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 9893.
12	Feyel S. ; Schr?der D. ; Schwarz H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 2647.
13	Justes D. R. ; Mitri? R. ; Moore N. A. ; Bona?i?-Koutecky V. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6289.
14	Zemski K. A. ; Justes D. R. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 10237.
15	Moore N. A. ; Mitri? R. ; Justes D. R. ; Bonaci?koutecky V. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 3015.
16	Justes D. R. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. ; Mitri? R. ; Bonaci?koutecky V. Eur. Phys. J. D 2003, 24, 331.
17	Zhao Y. X. ; Ding X. L. ; Ma Y. P. ; Wang Z. C. ; He S. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2010, 127, 449.
18	Yin S. ; Ma Y. P. ; Du L. ; He S. G. ; Ge M. F. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2008, 53, 3829.
19	Zhao Y. X. ; Wu X. N. ; Wang Z. C. ; He S. G. ; Ding X. L. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1736.
20	Yuan Z. ; Zhao Y.-X. ; Li X.-N. ; He S. -G. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 354-355, 105.
21	Bell R. C. ; Zemski K. A. ; Kerns K. P. ; Deng H. T. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1733.
22	Bell R. C. ; Zemski K. A. ; Castleman A. W, Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 8293.
23	Bell R. C. ; Zemski K. A. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 2992.
24	Bell R. C. ; Zemski K. A. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Clust. Sci. 1999, 10, 509.
25	Kooi S. E. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 5671.
26	Zemski K. A. ; Justes D. R. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 6136.
27	Bell R. C. ; Zemski K. A. ; Justes D. R. ; Castleman A. W., Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 798.
28	Harvey J. N. ; Diefenbach M. ; Schr?der D. ; Schwarz H. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999, s182-183, 85.
29	Feyel S. ; Scharfenberg L. ; Daniel C. ; Hartl H. ; Schroder D. ; Schwarz H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 3278.
30	Feyel S. ; Schr?der D. ; Schwarz H. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2008, 4961.
31	Feyel S. ; Schroder D. ; Rozanska X. ; Sauer J. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4677.
32	Feyel S. ; Dobler J. ; Schroder D. ; Sauer J. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4681.
33	Dietl N. ; Wende T. ; Chen K. ; Jiang L. ; Schlangen M. ; Zhang X. H. ; Asmis K. R. ; Schwarz H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3711.
34	Wende T. ; D?bler J. ; Jiang L. ; Claes P. ; Janssens E. ; Lievens P. ; Meijer G. ; Asmis K. R. ; Sauer J. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 297, 102.
35	Fielicke A. ; Rademann K. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 2621.
36	Gracia L. ; Sambrano J. R. ; Safont V. S. ; Calatayud M. ; Beltrán A. ; Andrés J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 3107.
37	Ma Y. P. ; Xue W. ; Wang Z. C. ; Ge M. F. ; He S. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 3731.
38	Dong F. ; Heinbuch S. ; Xie Y. ; Bernstein E. R. ; Rocca J. J. ; Wang Z. C. ; Ding X. L. ; He S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1057.
39	Dong F. ; Heinbuch S. ; Xie Y. ; Rocca J. J. ; Bernstein E. R. ; Wang Z. C. ; Deng K. ; He S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1932.
40	Wang Z. C. ; Xue W. ; Ma Y. P. ; Ding X. L. ; He S. G. ; Dong F. ; Heinbuch S. ; Rocca J. J. ; Bernstein E. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 5984.
41	Ma Y. P. ; Ding X. L. ; Zhao Y. X. ; He S. G. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2010, 11, 1718.
42	Yuan Z. ; Li Z. Y. ; Zhou Z. X. ; Liu Q. Y. ; Zhao Y. X. ; He S. G. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 14967.
43	Zhang M. Q. ; Zhao Y. X. ; Liu Q. Y. ; Li X. N. ; He S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 342.
44	Ma J. B. ; Wu X. N. ; Zhao Y. X. ; He S. G. ; Ding X. L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2010, 26, 1761.
44	马嘉璧; 吴晓楠; 赵艳霞; 何圣贵; 丁迅雷. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26, 1761.
45	Xu J. ; Rodgers M. T. ; Griffin J. B. ; Armentrout P. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 9339.
46	Aristov N. ; Armentrout P. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 5135.
47	Wu X. N. ; Xu B. ; Meng J. H. ; He S. G. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 310, 57.
48	Zhao Y. X. ; Li Z. Y. ; Yuan Z. ; Li X. N. ; He S. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9482.
49	Li Z. Y. ; Yuan Z. ; Li X. N. ; Zhao Y. X. ; He S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14307.
50	Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009.
51	Becke A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
52	Lee C. T. ; Yang W. T. ; Parr R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
53	Krishnan R. ; Binkley J. S. ; Seeger R. ; Pople J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650.
54	Sch?fer A. ; Huber C. ; Ahlrichs R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829.
55	Gonzalez C. ; Schlegel H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 2154.
56	Gonzalez C. ; Mcdouall J. J. W. ; Schlegel H. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 7467.
57	Gioumousis G. ; Stevenson D. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1958, 29, 294.
58	Kummerl?we G. ; Beyer M. K. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 244, 84.
59	Ma Y. P. ; Zhao Y. X. ; Li Z. Y. ; Ding X. L. ; He S. G. Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 24, 586.

[1]	李若宁, 张雪, 薛娜, 李杰, 吴天昊, 徐榛, 王一帆, 李娜, 唐浩, 侯士敏, 王永锋. Ag(111)表面Ag配位结构的分等级组装[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(8): 2011060 - .
[2]	卢浩然, 魏雅清, 龙闰. 纳米孔缺陷导致单层黑磷电荷局域极大抑制非辐射电子-空穴复合的时域模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2006064 - .
[3]	杨贻顺, 周敏, 邢燕霞. 基于γ-石墨炔分子磁隧道结对称性依赖的输运性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2003004 - .
[4]	李莹, 来雪琦, 曲津朋, 赖勤志, 伊廷锋. 钠离子电池用高性能锑基负极材料的调控策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(11): 2204049 - .
[5]	李孟婷, 郑星群, 李莉, 魏子栋. 碱性介质中氢氧化和析氢反应机理研究现状[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2007054 - .
[6]	周君慧, 敖志敏, 安太成. 基于密度泛函理论下H₂S在单原子催化剂V/Ti₂CO₂上的分解机理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2007086 - .
[7]	陈鹏, 周莹, 董帆. 二维光催化材料电子结构和性能调控策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2010010 - .
[8]	刘东, 陈圣韬, 李仁杰, 彭天右. 用于光催化能量转换的Z-型异质结的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2010017 - .
[9]	王云飞, 刘建华, 于美, 钟锦岩, 周琪森, 邱俊明, 张晓亮. SnO₂表面卤化提高钙钛矿太阳能电池光伏性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 2006030 - .
[10]	施俊杰, 胡子琦, 杨逸豪, 步宇翔, 施祖进. 内嵌金属碳氮化物团簇富勒烯的稳定性与生成机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 1907077 - .
[11]	李诗涵,赵侦超,李世坤,邢友东,张维萍. DFT计算结合固体NMR研究富铝SSZ-13的铝分布和Brønsted酸性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1903021 - .
[12]	肖雪珠, 曹小芳, 赵东波, 荣春英, 刘述斌. 运用概念密度泛函理论和信息论方法定量描述胺类分子的分子碱度[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 1906034 - .
[13]	黄智超,戴亚中,温晓杰,刘丹,林宇轩,徐珍,裴坚,吴凯. Au(111)表面Verdazyl自由基的构象转换[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1907043 - .
[14]	任熠,刘清宇,赵艳霞,杨祁,何圣贵. 多次碰撞条件下金阳离子诱导的甲烷碳―碳偶联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1904026 - .
[15]	单春晖,白若鹏,蓝宇. 过渡金属参与C―H键切断模式的理论研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 940 -953 .