钒硼双原子阳离子活化甲烷研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201811039

物理化学学报 >> 2019, Vol. 35 >> Issue (9): 1014-1020.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201811039

所属专题：碳氢键活化

钒硼双原子阳离子活化甲烷研究

陈强^1,²,姜利学^1,^2,³,李海方^1,^2,³,陈娇娇^1,^2,³,赵艳霞^1,^2,*(),何圣贵^1,^2,^3,*()

¹ 中国科学院化学研究所，分子动态与稳态结构国家重点实验室，北京 100190
² 北京分子科学国家研究中心；中国科学院分子科学科教融合卓越创新中心, 北京 100190
³ 中国科学院大学，北京 100049

收稿日期:2018-11-28 录用日期:2018-12-27 发布日期:2019-01-03
通讯作者: 赵艳霞,何圣贵 E-mail:chemzyx@iccas.ac.cn;shengguihe@iccas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(91645203);国家自然科学基金(21773253);中国博士后科学基金(2017M611002);北京市自然科学基金(2182092);中国科学院青年创新促进会基金(2018041)

Thermal Activation of Methane by Diatomic Vanadium Boride Cations

Qiang CHEN^1,²,Li-Xue JIANG^1,^2,³,Hai-Fang LI^1,^2,³,Jiao-Jiao CHEN^1,^2,³,Yan-Xia ZHAO^1,^2,*(),Sheng-Gui HE^1,^2,^3,*()

¹ State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, P. R. China
² Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and CAS Research/Education Center of Excellence in Molecular Sciences, Beijing 100190, P. R. China
³ University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P. R. China

Received:2018-11-28 Accepted:2018-12-27 Published:2019-01-03
Contact: Yan-Xia ZHAO,Sheng-Gui HE E-mail:chemzyx@iccas.ac.cn;shengguihe@iccas.ac.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(91645203);The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21773253);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2017M611002);Beijing Natural Science Foundation, China(2182092);Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences(2018041)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

3d过渡金属物种活化甲烷的研究已有较多报道，但人们对3d前过渡金属物种与甲烷反应体系的报道非常少，与之相关的甲烷活化机理的认识仍然非常有限。在本工作中，我们通过气相质谱实验和密度泛函理论计算证实了VB⁺离子可以在热碰撞条件下活化甲烷产生氢气和碳硼化合物，由于强的静电相互作用，甲烷活化优先发生在VB⁺离子的V原子位点。甲烷的活化转化涉及二态反应性，在反应的入口处需要经历从高自旋六重态到低自旋四重态的自旋反转。由于V―CH₃以及B―H化学键较强，H₃C―H键断裂以V―B单元协同插入而非单个V或B原子插入C―H键的方式进行。对VB⁺活化甲烷的机理认识可以为新型3d过渡金属催化剂活化甲烷的研究提供理论基础。

关键词: 甲烷活化, 前过渡金属, 硼, 质谱, 密度泛函理论

Abstract:

Methane activation by transition metal species has been extensively investigated over the past few decades. It is observed that ground-state monocations of bare 3d transition metals are inert toward CH₄ at room temperature because of unfavorable thermodynamics. In contrast, many mono-ligated 3d transition metal cations, such as MO⁺ (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn), MH⁺ (M = Fe, Co), and NiX⁺ (X = H, CH₃, F), as well as several bis-ligated 3d transition metal cations including OCrO⁺, Ni(H)(OH)⁺, and Fe(O)(OH)⁺ activate the C―H bond of methane under thermal collision conditions because of the pronounced ligand effects. In most of the above-mentioned examples, the 3d metal atoms are observed to cooperate with the attached ligands to activate the C―H bond. Compared to the extensive studies on active species comprising of middle and late 3d transition metals, the knowledge about the reactivity of early 3d transition metal species toward methane and the related C―H activation mechanisms are still very limited. Only two early 3d transition metal species HMO⁺ (M = Ti and V) are discovered so far to activate the C―H bond of methane via participation of their metal atoms. In this study, by performing mass spectrometric experiments and density functional theory calculations, we have identified that the diatomic vanadium boride cation (VB⁺) can activate methane to produce a dihydrogen molecule and carbon-boron species under thermal collision conditions. The strong electrostatic interaction makes the reaction preferentially proceed the V side. To generate experimentally observed product ions, a two-state reactivity scenario involving spin conversion from high-spin sextet to low-spin quartet is necessary at the entrance of the reaction. This result is consistent with the reported reactions of 3d transition metal species with CH₄, in which the C―H bond cleavage generally occurs in the low-spin states, even if the ground states of the related active species are in the high-spin states. For VB⁺ + CH₄, the insertion of the synergetic V―B unit (rather than a single V or B atom) into the H₃C―H bond causes the initial C―H bond activation driven by the strong bond strengths of V―CH₃ and B―H. The mechanisms of methane activation by VB⁺ discussed in this study may provide useful guidance to the future studies on methane activation by early transition metal systems.

Key words: Methane activation, Early transition metal, Boron, Mass spectrometry, Density functional theory

MSC2000:

O643

陈强,姜利学,李海方,陈娇娇,赵艳霞,何圣贵. 钒硼双原子阳离子活化甲烷研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1014-1020.

Qiang CHEN,Li-Xue JIANG,Hai-Fang LI,Jiao-Jiao CHEN,Yan-Xia ZHAO,Sheng-Gui HE. Thermal Activation of Methane by Diatomic Vanadium Boride Cations[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 1014-1020.

图/表 4

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

参考文献 56

1	Shilov A. E. ; Shul'pin G. B. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2879. doi: 10.1021/cr9411886
2	Wang V. C. ; Maji S. ; Chen P. P. ; Lee H. K. ; Yu S. S. ; Chan S. I. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8574. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00624
3	Labinger J. A. ; Bercaw J. E. Nature 2002, 417, 507. doi: 10.1038/417507a
4	Olivos-Suarez A. I. ; Szécsényi À. ; Hensen E. J. M. ; Ruiz-Martinez J. ; Pidko E. A. ; Gascon J. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 2965. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00428
5	Böhme D. K. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2336. doi: 10.1002/anie.200461698
6	Johnson G. E. ; Mitrić R. ; Bonačić-Koutecký V. ; Castleman A. W. Jr. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 475, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.04.003
7	Zhai H.-J. ; Wang L. -S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010, 500, 185. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.10.001
8	Yin S. ; Bernstein E. R. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 321-322, 49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2012.06.001
9	O'Hair R. A. J. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 377, 121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2014.05.003
10	Lang S. M. ; Bernhardt T. M. ; Chernyy V. ; Bakker J. M. ; Barnett R. N. ; Landman U. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 13406. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706009
11	Asmis K. R. ; Fielicke A. Top. Catal. 2018, 61, 1. doi: 10.1007/s11244-018-0906-5
12	Roithová J. ; Schrӧder D. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1170. doi: 10.1021/cr900183p
13	Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10096. doi: 10.1002/anie.201006424
14	Schwarz H. ; González-Navarrete P. ; Li J. ; Schlangen M. ; Sun X. ; Weiske T. ; Zhou S. Organometallics 2017, 36, 8. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00372
15	Wang D. ; Ding X. -L. ; Liao H. ; Dai J Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201809006
	王丹; 丁迅雷; 廖珩璐; 戴佳钰. 物理化学学报, 2019. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201809006
16	Buckner S. W. ; MacMahon T. J. ; Byrd G. D. ; Freiser B. S. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 3511. doi: 10.1021/ic00317a024
17	Irikura K. K. ; Beauchamp J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2769. doi: 10.1021/ja00007a070
18	Irikura K. K. ; Beauchamp J. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 8344. doi: 10.1021/j100174a057
19	Shayesteh A. ; Lavrov V. V. ; Koyanagi G. K. ; Bohme D. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 5602. doi: 10.1021/jp900671c
20	Schröder D. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 1433. doi: 10.1002/anie.199014331
21	Schröeder D. ; Fiedler A. ; Hrusak J. ; Schwarz H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1215. doi: 10.1021/ja00030a014
22	Chen Y.-M. ; Clemmer D. E. ; Armentrout P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7815. doi: 10.1021/ja00096a044
23	Ryan M. F. ; Fiedler A. ; Schröeder D. ; Schwarz H. Organometallics 1994, 13, 4072. doi: 10.1021/om00022a051
24	Ryan M. F. ; Fiedler A. ; Schroeder D. ; Schwarz H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2033. doi: 10.1021/ja00112a017
25	Schröder D. ; Schwarz H. ; Clemmer D. E. ; Chen Y. ; Armentrout P. B. ; Baranov V. I. ; Böhme D. K. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1997, 161, 175. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1176(96)04428-X
26	Aguirre F. ; Husband J. ; Thompson C. J. ; Stringer K. L. ; Metz R. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 4071. doi: 10.1063/1.1448489
27	Dietl N. ; van der Linde C. ; Schlangen M. ; Beyer M. K. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4966. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100606
28	Ard S. G. ; Melko J. J. ; Ushakov V. G. ; Johnson R. ; Fournier J. A. ; Shuman N. S. ; Guo H. ; Troe J. ; Viggiano A. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 2029. doi: 10.1021/jp5000705
29	Yue L. ; Li J. ; Zhou S. ; Sun X. ; Schlangen M. ; Shaik S. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10219. doi: 10.1002/anie.201703485
30	Carlin T. J. ; Sallans L. ; Cassady C. J. ; Jacobson D. B. ; Freiser B. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6320. doi: 10.1021/ja00358a027
31	Zhang Q. ; Bowers M. T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 9755. doi: 10.1021/jp047943t
32	Liu S. ; Geng Z. ; Wang Y. ; Yan Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 4560. doi: 10.1021/jp210924a
33	Schlangen M. ; Schroder D. ; Schwarz H. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 6810. doi: 10.1002/chem.200700506
34	Armélin M. ; Schlangen M. ; Schwarz H. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 5229. doi: 10.1002/chem.200800029
35	Schlangen M. ; Schwarz H. Helv. Chim. Acta 2008, 91, 2203. doi: 10.1002/hlca.200890238
36	Fiedler A. ; Kretzschmar I. ; Schröder D. ; Schwarz H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9941. doi: 10.1021/ja960157k
37	Schlangen M. ; Schroder D. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1641. doi: 10.1002/anie.200603266
38	Dede Y. ; Zhang X. ; Schlangen M. ; Schwarz H. ; Baik M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12634. doi: 10.1021/ja902093f
39	Lakuntza O. ; Matxain J. M. ; Ruiperez F. ; Besora M. ; Maseras F. ; Ugalde J. M. ; Schlangen M. ; Schwarz H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 9306. doi: 10.1039/C2CP23502A
40	Schröder D. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 991. doi: 10.1002/anie.199109911
41	Kretschmer R. ; Schlangen M. ; Schwarz H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 6097. doi: 10.1002/anie.201300900
42	Chen Q. ; Zhao Y.-X. ; Jiang L.-X. ; Li H.-F. ; Chen J.-J. ; Zhang T. ; Liu Q.-Y. ; He S.-G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 4641. doi: 10.1039/C8CP00071A
43	Chen Q. ; Zhao Y.-X. ; Jiang L. -X. ; Chen J. -J. ; He S. -G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 14134. doi: 10.1002/anie.201808780
44	Shaik S. ; Danovich D. ; Fiedler A. ; Schröder D. ; Schwarz H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1995, 78, 1393. doi: 10.1002/hlca.19950780602
45	Wu X.-N. ; Xu B. ; Meng J.-H. ; He S.-G. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 310, 57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2011.11.011
46	Yuan Z. ; Zhao Y.-X. ; Li X.-N. ; He S.-G. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2013, 354-355, 105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2013.06.004
47	Yuan Z. ; Liu Q.-Y. ; Li X. -N. ; He S. -G. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2016, 407, 62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2016.07.004
48	Gioumousis G. ; Stevenson D. P. J. Chem. Phys. 1958, 29, 294. doi: 10.1063/1.1744477
49	Kummerlowe G. ; Beyer M. K. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 244, 84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2005.03.012
50	Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision D.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford CT, USA, 2009.
51	Zhao Y. ; Truhlar D. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 194101. doi: 10.1063/1.2370993
52	Schäfer A. ; Huber C. ; Ahlrichs R. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 5829. doi: 10.1063/1.467146
53	Schlegel H. B. J. Comput. Chem. 1982, 3, 214. doi: 10.1002/jcc.540030212
54	Gonzalez C. ; Schlegel H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 2154. doi: 10.1063/1.456010
55	Glendening, E. D.; Reed, A. E.; Carpenter, J. E.; Weinhold, F. NBO 3.1; Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI, USA, 1996.
56	Lide, D. R. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA, 2003; Sect. 9, p. 52.

[1]	王丹,丁迅雷,廖珩璐,戴佳钰. 单个金或银原子掺杂的氧化钒团簇上的甲烷活化反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1005 -1013 .
[2]	韩萌茹,周亚男,周旋,储伟. 通过g-C₃N₄担载MNi₁₂ (Fe, Co, Cu, Zn)纳米团簇调节甲烷化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 850 -857 .
[3]	王琴,薛珉敏,张助华. 硼烯化学合成进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 565 -571 .
[4]	赵越,崔佳桐,胡继闯,马嘉璧. VO_1-4⁺阳离子与n-C_mH_2m+2 (m = 3, 5, 7)烷烃的反应性研究：氧含量和碳链长度的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(5): 531 -538 .
[5]	刘方彬,刘俊,王利祥. 带有噻吩侧基的有机硼小分子电子受体光伏材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3): 251 -256 .
[6]	贺熙,吕逍雨,樊喜,林文俊,李浩然,王从敏. 阴离子功能化大孔树脂用于二氧化硫的多位点高效捕集[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 896 -903 .
[7]	许文武,高嶷. 巯基保护的中空金纳米球[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(7): 770 -775 .
[8]	卢天,陈沁雪. 通过价层电子密度分析展现分子电子结构[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(5): 503 -513 .
[9]	尹玥琪,蒋梦绪,刘春光. Keggin型多酸负载的单原子催化剂(M₁/POM, M = Ni, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Au, POM = [PW₁₂O₄₀]^3-)活化氮气分子的密度泛函理论计算研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 270 -277 .
[10]	尹凡华,谭凯. 符合独立五元环规则的C₁₀₀(417)Cl₂₈形成机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 256 -262 .
[11]	钟爱国,李嵘嵘,洪琴,张杰,陈丹. 从能量和信息理论视角理解单取代烷烃的异构化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 303 -313 .
[12]	丁晓琴,丁俊杰,李大禹,潘里,裴承新. 基于概念密度泛函理论磷酸酯类反应性物质毒性预测[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 314 -322 .
[13]	王心怡,谢磊,丁元琪,姚心仪,张弛,孔惠慧,王利坤,许维. 超高真空条件下碱基与金属在Au(111)表面的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(12): 1321 -1333 .
[14]	刘甜,黎军,刘维佳,朱育丹,陆小华. 简单的配体改变调控钌配合物催化还原CO₂的活性：硼基配体的对位效应和Ru―H键的性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(10): 1097 -1105 .
[15]	陈驰,张雪,周志有,张新胜,孙世刚. S掺杂促进Fe/N/C催化剂氧还原活性的实验与理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1875 -1883 .

钒硼双原子阳离子活化甲烷研究

Thermal Activation of Methane by Diatomic Vanadium Boride Cations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 56

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10