Cu2-MnOx高效催化1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉氧化脱氢芳构化

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201811046

物理化学学报 >> 2019, Vol. 35 >> Issue (7): 775-786.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201811046

论文上一篇

Cu2-MnO_x高效催化1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉氧化脱氢芳构化

陈福山^1,²,赵松林^1,³,杨涛²,江涛涛¹,倪珺¹,张群峰^1,*(),李小年^1,*()

¹ 浙江工业大学工业催化研究所，杭州 310014
² 九江学院江西省生态化工工程技术研究中心，江西九江 332005
³ 台州学院医药化工学院，浙江台州 318000

收稿日期:2018-11-30 录用日期:2018-12-07 发布日期:2018-12-21
通讯作者: 张群峰,李小年 E-mail:zhangqf@zjut.edu.cn;xnli@zjut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21776258);国家自然科学基金(21476207);国家自然科学基金(21566013);国家自然科学基金(21875220);国家自然科学基金(91534113);国家自然科学基金(21406199);和浙江省科学技术厅项目(2015C31042)

Highly Efficient Oxidative Dehydrogenation Aromatization of 1, 2, 3, 4-Tetrahydroquinoline by Cu2-MnO_x Catalyst

Fushan CHEN^1,²,Songlin ZHAO^1,³,Tao YANG²,Taotao JIANG¹,Jun NI¹,Qunfeng ZHANG^1,*(),Xiaonian LI^1,*()

¹ Institute of Industrial Catalysis, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P. R. China
² Jiangxi Province Engineering Research Center of Ecological Chemical Industry, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, Jiangxi Province, P. R. China
³ School of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Engineering, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China

Received:2018-11-30 Accepted:2018-12-07 Published:2018-12-21
Contact: Qunfeng ZHANG,Xiaonian LI E-mail:zhangqf@zjut.edu.cn;xnli@zjut.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21776258);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21476207);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21566013);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21875220);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(91534113);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21406199);Program from Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province, China(2015C31042)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用新型无模板草酸盐路线制备了系列不同Cu含量的MnO_x催化剂(MnO_x、Cu1-MnO_x、Cu2-MnO_x、Cu3-MnO_x、Cu4-MnO_x、Cu2-450及Cu2-550)，并应用于1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉(THQL)氧化脱氢芳构化。通过热重和热流分析(TG-DSC)、X射线衍射(XRD)、N₂物理吸附-脱附、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)、能谱(EDS)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、H₂程序升温还原(H₂-TPR)、原子吸收光谱(AAS)手段对催化剂进行表征。结果显示在这七种锰氧化物中，Cu2-MnO_x具有高比表面积、增大的介孔平均孔径、较低的还原温度、最高的Mn³⁺含量和吸附氧含量，最高的Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺。Cu2-MnO_x在温和的反应条件下，以廉价的空气为氧化剂、无碱添加剂的情况下对THQL芳构化转化率和喹啉(QL)选择性分别达99.1%、97.2%。催化剂套用五次后转化率还可达95.8%，选择性随着套用次数增加略有降低，这可能是Cu元素的流失所致。催化剂无定型结构、Mn³⁺和吸附氧含量，Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺、晶格氧的流动性及CuO和MnO_x的协同作用是高催化活性的关键因素。

关键词: 草酸盐路线, 锰氧化物, CuO掺杂, 1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉, 氧化脱氢

Abstract:

A novel template-free oxalate route was applied to synthesize a series of MnO_x catalysts with different Cu content (MnO_x, Cu1-MnO_x, Cu2-MnO_x, Cu3-MnO_x, Cu4-MnO_x, Cu2-450, and Cu2-550), which were then used in 1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydroquinoline (THQL) oxidative dehydrogenation aromatization. To obtain insight into the structure-activity relationships of the catalysts, the samples were characterized by thermogravimetry and heat flow analysis, X-ray diffraction (XRD), N₂ physical adsorption-desorption, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), H₂ temperature programmed reduction (H₂-TPR), and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). The results showed that Cu2-MnO_x possesses the following characteristics: amorphous nature, high specific surface area, increased mesoporous average pore diameter, lower reduction temperature, highest Mn³⁺ and adsorbed oxygen content, and highest Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺ ratio among the seven manganese oxide catalysts. Cu2-MnO_x for the oxidative dehydrogenation aromatization of THQL showed conversion (99.1%) and selectivity (97.2%) for quinoline under mild reaction conditions, with cheap air as oxidant and no alkali additive. Cu2-MnO_x was reusable and achieved 95.8% conversion even after five reuse tests. Selectivity decreased slightly with the increase in reuse time, which could be attributed to the leaching of the Cu element. Comparison of structure-activity relationships showed increased catalytic activity when Mn³⁺ and adsorbed oxygen content were highest among these amorphous manganese oxides. Mn⁴⁺ content was related to the formation of quinoline N-oxide by over oxidation. Despite their high Mn³⁺ content and Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺ ratio, Cu2-450 and Cu2-550 had reduced surface area, adsorbed oxygen content, and lattice oxygen mobility, which resulted in poor catalytic performance. Although Cu3-MnO_x had the largest BET surface area, highest lattice oxygen mobility, and similar Mn³⁺ and adsorbed oxygen content as Cu2-MnO_x, the smaller average pore diameter of Cu3-MnO_x perhaps caused its conversion and selectivity to be similar to Cu2-MnO_x. The amorphous nature, Mn³⁺ and adsorbed oxygen content, Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺ ratio, lattice oxygen mobility, and synergistic effect between CuO and MnO_x were found to play key roles in catalytic performance. The absence of precious metals, the simple catalyst preparation process, the cheap air as the sole oxidant, no ligand and alkali, the mild reaction conditions, along with catalyst reusability and easy isolation of the aromatized products made our catalytic protocol both green and environmentally benign.

Key words: Oxalate route, Manganese oxide, CuO doping, 1, 2, 3, 4-Tetrahydroquinoline, Oxidative dehydrogenation

MSC2000:

O643

陈福山,赵松林,杨涛,江涛涛,倪珺,张群峰,李小年. Cu2-MnO_x高效催化1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉氧化脱氢芳构化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 775-786.

Fushan CHEN,Songlin ZHAO,Tao YANG,Taotao JIANG,Jun NI,Qunfeng ZHANG,Xiaonian LI. Highly Efficient Oxidative Dehydrogenation Aromatization of 1, 2, 3, 4-Tetrahydroquinoline by Cu2-MnO_x Catalyst[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(7): 775-786.

图/表 16

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

表2

图7

表3

表4

图8

图9

图10

表5

图11

参考文献 38

1	Zhang B. ; Studer A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 3505. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00083A
2	Deiters A. ; Martin S. F. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2199. doi: 10.1021/cr0200872
3	Wu J. ; Talwar D. ; Johnston S. ; Yan M. ; Xiao J. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2013, 125, 7121. doi: 10.1002/ange.2013.00.292
4	Yamaguchi R. ; Ikeda C. ; Takahashi Y. ; Fujita K.-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8410. doi: 10.1021/ja9022623
5	Muthaiah S. ; Hong S. H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 3045. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201200532
6	Chakraborty S. ; Brennessel W. W. ; Jones W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8564. doi: 10.1021/ja504523b
7	Kojima M. ; Kanai M. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2016, 55, 12224. doi: 10.1002/anie.2016.06.177
8	Jawale D. V. ; Gravel E. ; Shah N. ; Dauvois V. ; Li H. ; Namboothiri I. N. N. ; Doris E. Chem. -A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 7039. doi: 10.1002/chem.2015.00.148
9	Yamaguchi K. ; Mizuno N. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2003, 42, 1480. doi: 10.1002/anie.200250779
10	Furukawa S. ; Suga A. ; Komatsu T. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3277. doi: 10.1039/C4CC00024B
11	Amende M. ; Gleichweit C. ; Werner K. ; Schernich S. ; Zhao W. ; Lorenz M. P. A. ; Höfert O. ; Papp C. ; Koch M. ; Wasserscheid P. ; et al ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 657. doi: 10.1021/cs400946x
12	So M. H. ; Liu Y. ; Ho C. M. ; Che C. M. Chem. -An Asian J. 2009, 4, 1551. doi: 10.1002/asia.200900261
13	Cui X. ; Li Y. ; Bachmann S. ; Scalone M. ; Surkus A. E. ; Junge K. ; Topf C. ; Beller M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10652. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b05674
14	Damodara D. ; Arundhathi R. ; Likhar P. R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 189. doi: 10.1002/adsc.2013.00.453
15	Zhou W. ; Tao Q. ; Sun F. A. ; Cao X. ; Qian J. ; Xu J. ; He M. ; Chen Q. ; Xiao J. J. Catal. 2018, 361, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.01.030
16	Mullick K. ; Biswas S. ; Angeles-Boza A. M. ; Suib S. L. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 2256. doi: 10.1039/C6CC09095H
17	Shu Z. ; Chen Y. ; Huang W. ; Cui X. ; Zhang L. ; Chen H. ; Zhang G. ; Fan X. ; Wang Y. ; Tao G. ; et al Appl. Catal. B 2013, 140-141, 42. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.03.030
18	Ma X. ; Li J. ; Rankin M. A. ; Croll L. M. ; Dahn J. R. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 244, 192. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.10.019
19	Tang W. ; Wu X. ; Li D. ; Wang Z. ; Liu G. ; Liu H. ; Chen Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 2544. doi: 10.1039/C3TA13847J
20	Yu C. ; Zhang L. ; Shi J. ; Zhao J. ; Gao J. ; Yan D. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1544. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200701052
21	Sing K. S. W. ; Everett D. H. ; Haul R. A. W. ; Moscou L. ; Pierotti R. A. ; Rouquerol J. ; Siemieniewska T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 603.
22	Puzan A. N. ; Baumer V. N. ; Lisovytskiy D. V. ; Mateychenko P. V. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 260, 87. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2018.01.022
23	Donkova B. ; Mehandjiev D. Thermochim. Acta 2004, 421, 141. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2004.04.001
24	Poyraz A. S. ; Kuo C. H. ; Biswas S. ; King'ondu C. K. ; Suib S. L. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2952. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3952
25	Tompsett G. A. ; Krogh L. ; Griffin D. W. ; Conner W. C. Langmuir 2005, 21, 8214. doi: 10.1021/la050068y
26	Stebounova L. V. ; Gonzalez-Pech N. I. ; Peters T. M. ; Grassian V. H. Environn Sci.-Nano 2018, 5, 696. doi: 10.1039/C7EN01046J
27	Venkataswamy P. ; Rao K. N. ; Jampaiah D. ; Reddy B. M. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 162, 122. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.06.038
28	Tan W. ; Guo G. ; Deng J. ; Xie S. ; Yang H. ; Jiang Y. ; Dai H. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 18452. doi: 10.1021/ie503784e
29	Liu Y. ; Dai H. ; Deng J. ; Xie S. ; Yang H. ; Tan W. ; Han W. ; Jiang Y. ; Guo G. J. Catal. 2014, 309, 408. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2013.10.019
30	Liu G. ; Sun L. ; Liu J. ; Wang F. ; Guild C. J. Mol. Catal. 2017, 440, 148. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.07.017
31	Wu X. ; Fang Z. ; Pan H. ; Zheng Y. ; Jiang D. ; Ni J. ; Li X. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 797. doi: 10.1039/C6CY02286C
32	Biswas S. ; Mullick K. ; Chen S. Y. ; Kriz D. A. ; Shakil M. D. ; Kuo C. H. ; Angeles-Boza A. M. ; Rossi A. R. ; Suib S. L. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 5069. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00717
33	Kapteijn F. ; Singoredjo L. ; Andreini A. ; Moulijn J. A. Appl. Catal. B 1994, 3, 173. doi: 10.1016/0926-3373(93)E0034-9
34	Zhang X. ; Li H. ; Yang Y. ; Zhang T. ; Wen X. ; Liu N. ; Wang D. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5179. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.059
35	Qian K. ; Qian Z. ; Hua Q. ; Jiang Z. ; Huang W. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 273, 357. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.043
36	Biswas S. ; Poyraz A. S. ; Meng Y. ; Kuo C. H. ; Guild C. ; Tripp H. ; Suib S. L. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 165, 731. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.055
37	Doornkamp C. ; Ponec V. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 162, 19. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1169(00)00319-8
38	Biswas S. ; Dutta B. ; Mullick K. ; Kuo C. H. ; Poyraz A. S. ; Suib S. L. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 4394. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b00325

Sample	BET surface area	BJH pore size/nm	BJH pore volume
Sample	(m²·g^?1)	BJH pore size/nm	(cm³·g^?1)
MnO_x	289.1	3.2	0.17
Cu1-MnO_x	253.2	4.2	0.16
Cu2-MnO_x	239.3	4.9	0.16
Cu3-MnO_x	302.9	3.4	0.22
Cu4-MnO_x	246.2	4.0	0.13
Cu2-450	47.8	14.7	0.16
Cu2-550	27.1	22.7	0.17

Sample	Surface element molar fraction
	Mn				O
	Mn²⁺	Mn³⁺	Mn⁴⁺	Mn³⁺/Mn⁴⁺	O_ads	O_latt
MnO_x	0.202	0.412	0.386	1.07	0.257	0.685
Cu1-MnO_x	0.224	0.451	0.324	1.39	0.288	0.653
Cu2-MnO_x	0.242	0.476	0.282	1.69	0.307	0.592
Cu3-MnO_x	0.244	0.470	0.288	1.63	0.293	0.675
Cu4-MnO_x	0.205	0.454	0.340	1.34	0.285	0.684
Cu2-450	0.245	0.477	0.278	1.72	0.205	0.757
Cu2-550	0.247	0.508	0.243	2.21	0.215	0.742


Entry	Catalyst	Conversion of THQL/%	Selectivity of QL/%
1	No catalyst	0.9	100
2	MnO_x	90.8	85.2
3	Fe1-MnO_x	87.1	88.2
4	Al1-MnO_x	94.1	88.6
5	Ni1-MnO_x	85.1	82.4
6	Co1-MnO_x	88.1	86.2
7	Cu1-MnO_x	97.1	92.7

Entry	Catalyst	Cu content/%^a	Conversion of THQL/%	Selectivity of QL/%^b	TOF/(mmol·mg^?1·h^?1)^c
1	Cu1-MnO_x	0.23	97.1	92.7	0.00194
2	Cu2-MnO_x	0.81	99.1	97.2	0.00198
3	Cu3-MnO_x	2.83	98.1	96.9	0.00196
4	Cu4-MnO_x	8.92	97.3	93.0	0.00195
5	CuO	—	10.6	88.3	0.00021
6	Cu2-450	—	37.5	71.7	0.00075
7	Cu2-550	—	30.4	75.1	0.00061
8 ^d	Cu2-MnO_x	0.81	92.9	86.4	0.00929
9 ^e	Cu2-MnO_x	0.81	18.0	94.6	0.00036
10 ^f	Cu2-MnO_x	0.81	39.8	98.9	0.00080
11 ^g	Cu2-MnO_x	0.81	99.9	77.1	0.00199
12 ^h	Cu2-MnO_x	0.81	80.2	86.4	0.00160
13 ⁱ	Cu2-MnO_x	0.81	82.5	56.8	0.00165

Enry	Catalyst	W_catal. /mg	t/h	Con./Sel. (%)	TOF/(mmol·mg^-1·h^?1)	Ref.
1	AMO	25	5	60/90	0.00120	16
2	K-OMS-2	25	5	65/70	0.00130	16
3	Meso-Cs/MnO_x	25	5	50/99	0.00100	16
4	Meso-MnO_x	25	5	50/99	0.00100	16
5	Ni2Mn-LDH	80	2.5	99/93	0.00247	15
6	Cu2-MnO_x	25	5	99.1/97.2	0.00198	this work

Cu2-MnO_x高效催化1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉氧化脱氢芳构化

Highly Efficient Oxidative Dehydrogenation Aromatization of 1, 2, 3, 4-Tetrahydroquinoline by Cu2-MnO_x Catalyst

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	赖潇潇, 冯洁, 周晓英, 侯忠燕, 林涛, 陈耀强. 钾改性Mn/Ce_0.65Zr_0.35O₂催化剂催化氧化甲苯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(8): 1905047 -0 .
[2]	傅之丹,臧佳欣,叶青,程水源,康天放. OL负载Cu催化剂及其催化氧化CO及乙酸乙酯性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1855 -1864 .
[3]	刘兆信,黎维彬. 在类棒状铜锰复合氧化物上甲苯的催化燃烧活性及其失活[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(7): 1795 -1800 .
[4]	刘小青,李时卉,孙梦婷,喻成龙,黄碧纯. MnO_x/SAPO-11催化剂的制备、表征及其低温NH₃-SCR活性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(5): 1236 -1246 .
[5]	田文杰,王虹,尹振,杨映,李建新. 纳米氧化锰负载钛基电催化膜制备及其苯甲醇催化氧化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(8): 1567 -1574 .
[6]	焦金珍, 李时卉, 黄碧纯. 石墨烯负载MnO_x催化剂的制备及其低温NH₃-SCR活性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(7): 1383 -1390 .
[7]	任成军, 周丽娜, 尚鸿燕, 陈耀强. 浸渍法制备的Pd-MnO_x/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂及不同载体对地表O₃降解的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(5): 957 -964 .
[8]	杨超, 刘小青, 黄碧纯, 吴友明. Zr 改性MnO_x/MWCNTs催化剂的结构特征与低温SCR活性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(10): 1895 -1902 .
[9]	李乐, 贺蕴秋, 储晓菲, 李一鸣, 孙芳芳, 黄河洲. 水热合成部分还原氧化石墨烯-K₂Mn₄O₈超级电容器纳米复合材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(08): 1681 -1690 .
[10]	鲁怀乾, 石磊, 何冲, 翁维正, 黄传敬, 万惠霖. SBA-15负载高分散纳米NiO的丙烷氧化脱氢制丙烯催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(11): 2697 -2704 .
[11]	孙毅飞, 李广超, 潘心頔, 黄传敬, 翁维正, 万惠霖. 介孔氧化铝负载Ni-Co氧化物催化剂上丙烷氧化脱氢制丙烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(09): 2135 -2140 .
[12]	汪彩彩, 李建辉, 孙毅飞, 朱晓权, 黄传敬, 翁维正, 万惠霖. 介孔CeNiO催化剂的合成及其丙烷氧化脱氢制丙烯反应性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(10): 2421 -2426 .
[13]	王凡, 王岩敏, 文衍宣, 粟海峰, 李斌. 从Mn₃O₄前驱体到MnO₂纳米结构的形貌和结构变化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(02): 521 -526 .
[14]	杨顺毅;王先友;魏建良;李秀琴;唐安平. Na-Mn-O正极材料的合成及电化学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2008, 24(09): 1669 -1674 .
[15]	裴素朋;张斌;焦昆;包任烈;岳斌;贺鹤勇. SBA-15负载纳米CoMoO₄催化剂催化丙烷氧化脱氢制丙烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2008, 24(04): 561 -564 .

Cu2-MnOx高效催化1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉氧化脱氢芳构化

Highly Efficient Oxidative Dehydrogenation Aromatization of 1, 2, 3, 4-Tetrahydroquinoline by Cu2-MnOx Catalyst

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 16

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

Cu2-MnO_x高效催化1, 2, 3, 4-四氢喹啉氧化脱氢芳构化

Highly Efficient Oxidative Dehydrogenation Aromatization of 1, 2, 3, 4-Tetrahydroquinoline by Cu2-MnO_x Catalyst