粘结剂对形貌各异的石墨负极电化学性能的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201903060

物理化学学报 >> 2019, Vol. 35 >> Issue (12): 1382-1390.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201903060

粘结剂对形貌各异的石墨负极电化学性能的影响

Rahim Shah^1,²,Naveed Alam^1,²,Amir A.Razzaq^1,²,杨成^1,²,陈宇杰^1,²,胡加鹏^1,²,赵晓辉^1,^2,*(),彭扬^1,²,邓昭^1,^2,*()

¹ 苏州大学能源与材料创新研究院，能源学院，江苏苏州 215006
² 江苏省先进碳材料与可穿戴能源技术重点实验室，江苏苏州 215006

收稿日期:2019-03-26 录用日期:2019-05-13 发布日期:2019-05-20
通讯作者: 赵晓辉,邓昭 E-mail:zhaoxh@suda.edu.cn;zdeng@suda.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21701118);国家自然科学基金(21805201);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20161209);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20160323);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20170341);中国博士后科学基金(2017M611899);中国博士后科学基金(2018T110544);苏州市产业技术创新专项(前瞻性应用研究)(SYG201748)

Effect of Binder Conformity on the Electrochemical Behavior of Graphite Anodes with Different Particle Shapes

Shah Rahim^1,²,Alam Naveed^1,²,A. Razzaq Amir^1,²,Cheng YANG^1,²,Yujie CHEN^1,²,Jiapeng HU^1,²,Xiaohui ZHAO^1,^2,*(),Yang PENG^1,²,Zhao DENG^1,^2,*()

¹ Soochow Institute for Energy and Materials Innovations, College of Energy, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, P. R. China
² Provincial Key Laboratory for Advanced Carbon Materials and Wearable Energy Technologies, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, P. R. China

Received:2019-03-26 Accepted:2019-05-13 Published:2019-05-20
Contact: Xiaohui ZHAO,Zhao DENG E-mail:zhaoxh@suda.edu.cn;zdeng@suda.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21701118);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21805201);the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China(BK20161209);the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China(BK20160323);the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China(BK20170341);the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China(2017M611899);the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China(2018T110544);the Key Technology Initiative of Suzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, China(SYG201748)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文通过不同形貌的石墨材料，研究了聚丙烯腈-丁二烯(NBR)作为锂离子电池粘结剂的电化学性能，并与商业化粘结剂聚偏氟乙烯(PVDF)进行了对比。由于NBR无定形的晶体结构和连续性的特点，使其能够更好的粘结在活性材料表面，在球型和片状石墨表面都能形成均一的具有抑制副反应和提高锂离子传输能力的保护层。实验证明，片层状石墨在以PVDF作粘结剂时，电化学性能较差。然而，以NBR作为粘结剂时，球型和片状的石墨材料在库伦效率、循环稳定性和传输动力学上都有明显的提升。此项研究证实了粘结剂和活性材料的一致性对于提高锂离子电池电化学性能的重要性。

关键词: 粘结剂, 聚丙烯腈-丁二烯, 石墨负极, 电化学性能, 锂离子电池

Abstract:

As an important component in electrodes, the choice of an appropriate binder is significant when fabricating lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with good cycle stability and rate capability, which are used in numerous applications, especially portable electronics and eco-friendly electric vehicles (EVs). Semi-crystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), which is a traditional and widely used binder, cannot efficiently accommodate the volume changes observed in the anode during the charge-discharge process while binding all the components in the electrode together, which results in increased internal cell resistance, detachment of the electrode components, and capacity fading. Herein, we have investigated a highly polar and elastomeric polyacrylonitrile-butadiene (NBR) rubber for use as a binder in LIBs, which can accommodate graphite particles of different shapes compared to semi-crystalline PVDF. Prior to our electrochemical tests, NBR was analyzed using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), showing good thermal stability and an amorphous morphology. NBR is more conformable to irregular surfaces, which results in the formation of a homogeneous passivation layer on both spherical and flaky graphite particles to effectively suppress any electrolyte side reactions, further allowing more uniform and fast Li ion diffusion at the electrolyte/electrolyte interface. As a result, the electrochemical performance of both spherical and flaky shape graphite electrodes was significantly improved in terms of their first cycle Coulombic efficiency (CE) and cycle stability. With comparative specific capacity, the first cycle CE of the NBR-based spherical and flaky graphite electrodes were 87.0% and 85.5%, compared to 85.3% and 82.6% observed for their corresponding PVDF-based electrodes, respectively. After 1000 discharge-charge cycles at 1C, the capacity retention of the NBR-based graphite electrodes was significantly higher than that of PVDF-based electrodes. This was attributed to the good stability of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formed on the graphite electrodes and the high stretching ability of the elastomeric NBR binder, which help to accommodate the repeated volume fluctuation of graphite observed during long-term charge-discharge cycling. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and microscopic analysis (SEM and TEM) were carried out to investigate the formation and evolution of the SEI layers formed on the spherical and flaky graphite electrodes. The results show that thin, homogeneous, and stable SEI layers are formed on the surface of both spherical and flaky graphite electrodes prepared using the NBR binder. When compared to the PVDF-based graphite electrodes, the graphite electrodes constructed using NBR showed decreased resistance in the SEI layer and faster charge transfer, thus enhancing the electrode kinetics for Li ion intercalation/deintercalation. Our study shows that the electrochemical performance of spherical and flaky graphite electrodes prepared using the NBR binder is significantly improved, demonstrating that NBR is a promising binder for these electrodes in LIBs.

Key words: Binder, Polyacrylonitrile-butadiene, Graphite anode, Electrochemical performance, Lithium ion battery

MSC2000:

O646

Rahim Shah,Naveed Alam,Amir A.Razzaq,杨成,陈宇杰,胡加鹏,赵晓辉,彭扬,邓昭. 粘结剂对形貌各异的石墨负极电化学性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(12): 1382-1390.

Shah Rahim,Alam Naveed,A. Razzaq Amir,Cheng YANG,Yujie CHEN,Jiapeng HU,Xiaohui ZHAO,Yang PENG,Zhao DENG. Effect of Binder Conformity on the Electrochemical Behavior of Graphite Anodes with Different Particle Shapes[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(12): 1382-1390.

图/表 8

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Table 1

Fig 6

Fig 7

参考文献 30

1	(a) Armand, M.; Tarascon, J. M. Nature 2008, 451, 652. doi: 10.1038/451652a
	(b) Sun, Y.; Liu, N.; Cui, Y. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16071. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.71
2	(a) Wang, Y. D.; Wang, J.; Mu, Q. Y.; Li, Y. W.; Qi, L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2007, 23, 14.[王雅丹,王剑,牟其勇,李永伟,其鲁,物理化学学报, 2007, 23, 14.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB2007Supp04
	(b) Kang, B.; Ceder, G. Nature 2009, 458, 190. doi: 10.1038/nature07853
	(c) Scrosati, B.; Garche, J. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 2419. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048
	(d) Zhou, G.; Li, F.; Cheng, H. M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1307. doi: 10.1039/C3EE43182G
3	(a) Li, F.; Xu, X. Z.; Song, H.; Xiong, J.; Wu, F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 2205.[李芬,徐献芝,宋辉,熊晋,吴飞,物理化学学报, 2009, 25, 2205.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20091119
	(b) Yoo, M.; Frank, C. W.; Mori, S.; Yamaguchi, S. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 1945. doi: 10.1021/cm0304593
	(c) Rago, N. D.; Bareño, J.; Li, J.; Du, Z.; Wood Ⅲ, D. L.; Steele, L. A.; Lamb, J.; Spangler, S.; Grosso, C.; Fenton, K.; Bloom, I. 2018, 385, 148. J. Power Sources 2018, 385, 148. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.009
4	Zhang S. S. ; Jow T. R. J. Power Sources 2002, 109, 422. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00107-6
5	Ma Y. ; Ma J. ; Chai J. ; Liu Z. ; Ding G. ; Xu G. ; Liu H. ; Chen B. ; Zhou X. ; Cui G. ; et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 41462. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b11342
6	(a) Zhang, S. S.; Xu, K.; Jow, T. R. J. Power Sources 2004, 138, 226. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.05.056
	(b) Patnaik, S. G.; Vedarajan, R.; Matsumi, N. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 17909. doi: 10.1039/C7TA03843G
7	Komaba S. ; Shimomura K. ; Yabuuchi N. ; Ozeki T. ; Yui H. ; Komaba S. ; Shimomura K. ; Yabuuchi N. ; Ozeki T. ; Yui H. ; Konno K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 13487. doi: 10.1021/jp201691g
8	(a) Buqa, H.; Holzapfel, M.; Krumeich, F.; Veit, C.; Novák, P. J. Power Sources 2006, 161, 617. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.03.073
	(b) Lee, J. R.; Won, J. H.; Kim, J. H.; Kim, K. J.; Lee, S. Y. J. Power Sources 2012, 216, 42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.05.052
9	Komaba S. ; Yabuuchi N. ; Ozeki T. ; Okushi K. ; Yui H. ; Konno K. ; Katayama Y. ; Miura T. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 6069. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.058
10	Lee J. H. ; Paik U. ; Hackley V. A. ; Choi Y. M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A1763. doi: 10.1149/1.1979214
11	Tanaka S. ; Narutomi T. ; Suzuki S. ; Nakao A. ; Oji H. ; Yabuuchi N. J. Power Sources 2017, 358, 121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.032
12	(a) Lee, S. Y.; Choi, Y.; Hong, K. S.; Lee, J. K.; Kim, J. Y.; Bae, J. S.; Jeong, E. D. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 447, 442. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.004
	(b) Hays, K. A.; Ruther, R. E.; Kukay, A. J.; Cao, P. F.; Saito, T.; Wood, D. L.; Li, J. L. J. Power Sources 2018, 384, 136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.085
13	Qiu L. ; Shen Y. ; Fan H. ; Yang X. ; Wang C. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 672. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.062
14	Lee B. R. ; Kim S. j. ; Oh E. S. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 161, A2128. doi: 10.1149/2.0641414jes
15	Wu Y. L. ; Yang J. ; Wang J. L. ; Yin L. C. ; Nuli Y. N. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2010, 26, 283. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100205
	伍英蕾; 杨军; 王久林; 尹利超; 努丽燕娜. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26, 283. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100205
16	Kovalenko I. ; Zdyrko B. ; Magasinski A. ; Hertzberg B. ; Milicev Z. ; Burtovyy R. ; Luzinov I. ; Yushin G. Science 2011, 334, 75. doi: 10.1126/science.1209150
17	Bae J. ; Cha S. H. ; Park J. Macromol. Res. 2013, 21, 826. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201100236
18	Kim J. S. ; Choi W. ; Cho K. Y. ; Byun D. ; Lim J. ; Lee J. K. J. Power Sources 2013, 244, 521. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.049
19	Ma Y. ; Chen K. ; Ma J. ; Xu G. ; Dong S. ; Chen B. ; Li J. ; Chen Z. ; Zhou X. ; Cui G. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 273. doi: 10.1039/C8EE02555J
20	Liu W. R. ; Yang M. H. ; Wu H. C. ; Chiao S. ; Wu N. L. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2005, 8, A100. doi: 10.1149/1.1847685
21	Shah R. ; Gu J. ; Razzaq A. ; Zhao X. ; Shen X. ; Miao L. ; Yan C. ; Peng Y. ; Deng Z. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 3171. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00388
22	(a) Wang, H.; Umeno, T.; Mizuma, K.; Yoshio, M. J. Power Sources 2008, 175, 886. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.103
	(b) Rezvani, S. J.; Pasqualini, M.; Witkowska, A.; Gunnella, R.; Birrozzi, A.; Minicucci, M.; Rajantie, H.; Copley, M.; Nobili, F.; Di Cicco, A. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 1029. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.195
	(c) Chou, W. Y.; Jin, Y. C.; Duh, J. G.; Lu, C. Z.; Liao, S. C. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 1272. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.046
23	Wang Y. ; Zheng H. ; Qu Q. ; Zhang L. ; Battaglia VS. ; Zheng H. Carbon 2015, 92, 318. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.084
24	(a) Shi, Q.; Heng, S.; Qu, Q.; Gao, T.; Liu, W.; Hang, L.; Zheng, H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 22, 10885. doi: 10.1039/C7TA02706K
	(b) Luo, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Han, X.; Dong, H.; Xu, X.; Chen C.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, J. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2016, 12, 8154. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b03046
25	(a) Wotango, A. S.; Su, W. N.; Haregewoin, A. M.; Chen, H. M.; Cheng, J. H.; Lin, M. H.; Wang, C. H.; Hwang, B. J. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2018, 10, 25252. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b02185
	(b) Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Qu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, H. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 191, 70. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.025
26	(a) Xiang, H.; Mei, D.; Yan, P.; Bhattacharya, P.; Burton, S. D.; von Wald Cresce, A.; Cao, R.; Engelhard, M. H.; Bowden, M. E.; Zhu, Z.; et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 20687. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b05552
	(b) Kil, K. C. Paik, U. Macromol. Res. 2015, 23, 719. doi: 10.1007/s13233-015-3094-1
27	(a) Wang, R.; Feng, L.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, W.; Liu, B.; Zhang, W.; Chuan, Y.; Zheng, Z. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 575. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2348-6
	(b) Komaba, S.; Itabashi, T.; Kaplan, B.; Groult, H.; Kumagai, N. Electrochem. Commun. 2003, 5, 962. doi: 10.1016/j.e;ecom.2003.09.003
	(c) Lee, J. T.; Wu, M. S.; Wang, F. M.; Lin, Y. W.; Bai, M. Y.; Chiang, P. C. J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A1837. doi: 10.1149/1.1993407
28	(a) Chai, L.; Qu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Shen, M.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, H. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 105, 378. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.009
	(b) Wang, Z.; Dang, G.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, J. Inter. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12, 7457. doi: 10.20964/2017.08.55
	(c) Zhao, H.; Du, A.; Ling, M.; Battaglia, V.; Liu, G. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 209, 159. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.061
	(d) Gómez-Cámer, J. L.; Bünzli, C.; Hantel, M. M.; Poux, T.; Novák, P. Carbon 2016, 105, 42. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.022
	(e) Ku, J. H.; Hwang, S. S.; Ham, D. J.; Song, M. S.; Shon, J. K.; Ji, S. M.; Choi, J. M.; Doo, S. G. J. Power Sources 2015, 287, 36. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.007
	(f) Shin, D.; Park, H.; Paik, U. Electrochem. Commun. 2017, 77, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.02.018
29	(a) Tang, J.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X.; Yao, H.; Zhou, L. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 23844. doi: 10.1039/C5TA06859B
	(b) Levi, M. D.; Aurbach, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 4630. doi: 10.1021/jp9701909
	(c) Sun, X. Z.; Huang, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, D. C.; Zhang, H. T.; Ma, Y. W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 30, 2071.[孙现众,黄博,张熊,张大成,张海涛,马衍伟.物理化学学报, 2014, 30, 2071.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201408292
30	(a) Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Chai, L.; Xue, P.; Hao, W.; Zheng, H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 19036. doi: 10.1039/C4TA04320K
	(b) Ryou, M. H.; Kim, J.; Lee, I.; Kim, S.; Jeong, Y.; K.; Hong, S.; Ryu, J. H.; Kim, T. S.; Park, J. K.; Lee, H. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1571. doi: 1010.1002/adma.201203981

Electrode	S-graphite-PVDF	S-graphite-NBR	F-graphite-PVDF	F-graphite-NBR
First-cycle C.E	85.3%	87.0%	82.6%	85.5%
Reversible C.E	95.6%	99.2%	98.5%	99.5%
SEI contribution	10.3%	12.2%	15.9%	14.0%

[1]	汪茹, 刘志康, 严超, 伽龙, 黄云辉. 高安全锂离子电池复合集流体的界面强化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2203043 -0 .
[2]	齐亚娥, 夏永姚. 电解液调控策略提升水系锌离子电池正极材料电化学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2205045 -0 .
[3]	朱思颖, 李辉阳, 胡忠利, 张桥保, 赵金保, 张力. 锂离子电池氧化亚硅负极结构优化和界面改性研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2103052 - .
[4]	杨越, 朱加伟, 王鹏彦, 刘海咪, 曾炜豪, 陈磊, 陈志祥, 木士春. 镶嵌于NH₂-MIL-125 (Ti)衍生氮掺多孔碳中的花状超细纳米TiO₂作为高活性和稳定性的锂离子电池负极材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2106002 - .
[5]	莫英, 肖逵逵, 吴剑芳, 刘辉, 胡爱平, 高鹏, 刘继磊. 锂离子电池隔膜的功能化改性及表征技术[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2107030 - .
[6]	吴锋, 李晴, 陈来, 王紫润, 陈刚, 包丽颖, 卢赟, 陈实, 苏岳锋. 高镍正极材料中钴元素的替代方案及其合成工艺优化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2007017 - .
[7]	薄拯, 孔竞, 杨化超, 郑周威, 陈鹏鹏, 严建华, 岑可法. 基于混合溶剂有机电解液的超低温孔洞石墨烯超级电容[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2005054 - .
[8]	刘学伟, 牛莹, 曹瑞雄, 陈晓红, 商红岩, 宋怀河. 石墨烯包覆天然球形石墨作为锂离子电池的负极材料，是否需要乙炔黑导电剂？[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2012062 - .
[9]	丁晓博, 黄倩晖, 熊训辉. 锂离子电池快充石墨负极研究与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(11): 2204057 - .
[10]	苏岳锋, 张其雨, 陈来, 包丽颖, 卢赟, 陈实, 吴锋. ZrO₂包覆高镍LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂正极材料提高其循环稳定性的作用机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 2005062 - .
[11]	李慧, 刘双宇, 袁天赐, 王博, 盛鹏, 徐丽, 赵广耀, 白会涛, 陈新, 陈重学, 曹余良. NaOH浓度对Na_0.44MnO₂储钠性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 1907049 - .
[12]	陈瑶, 董浩洋, 李园园, 刘金平. 钠离子电池阵列化负极材料的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(12): 2007075 - .
[13]	张思东, 刘园, 祁慕尧, 曹安民. 表面限域掺杂提升高比能正极材料稳定性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(11): 2011007 - .
[14]	叶耀坤, 胡宗祥, 刘佳华, 林伟成, 陈涛文, 郑家新, 潘锋. 锂离子电池正极材料中的极化子现象理论计算研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(11): 2011003 - .
[15]	安惠芳, 姜莉, 李峰, 吴平, 朱晓舒, 魏少华, 周益明. 基于水凝胶衍生的硅/碳纳米管/石墨烯纳米复合材料及储锂性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(7): 1905034 - .

粘结剂对形貌各异的石墨负极电化学性能的影响

Effect of Binder Conformity on the Electrochemical Behavior of Graphite Anodes with Different Particle Shapes

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0