三维无溶剂含能Ag-MOF的制备、热分解动力学及爆炸性能

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905085

物理化学学报 >> 2020, Vol. 36 >> Issue (6): 1905085.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905085

所属专题：热分析动力学和热动力学

三维无溶剂含能Ag-MOF的制备、热分解动力学及爆炸性能

乔成芳¹,吕磊³,许文风²,夏正强²,周春生¹,陈三平^2,*(),高胜利^1,²

¹ 商洛学院化学工程与现代材料学院，陕西省尾矿资源综合利用重点实验室，陕西商洛 726000
² 西北大学化学与材料科学学院，教育部合成与天然功能分子化学重点实验室，西安 710127
³ 延安大学化学与化工学院，陕西省化学反应工程重点实验室，陕西延安 716000

收稿日期:2019-05-31 录用日期:2019-06-27 发布日期:2019-12-18
通讯作者: 陈三平 E-mail:sanpingchen@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21727805);国家自然科学基金(21673180);国家自然科学基金(21703135);国家自然科学基金(21803042);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2017JZ002);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2018JM5180);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2019JQ-249);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2019JQ-067);陕西省化学反应工程重点实验室项目(14JS112);第64批中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2018M643706)

Synthesis, Thermal Decomposition Kinetics and Detonation Performance of a Three-Dimensional Solvent-Free Energetic Ag(I)-MOF

Chengfang Qiao¹,Lei Lü³,Wenfeng Xu²,Zhengqiang Xia²,Chunsheng Zhou¹,Sanping Chen^2,*(),Shengli Gao^1,²

¹ Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Utilization of Tailings Resources, College of Chemical Engineering and Modern Materials, Shangluo University, Shangluo 726000, Shaanxi Province, P. R. China
² Key Laboratory of Synthetic and Natural Functional Molecule Chemistry of the Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, P. R. China
³ Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, Shaanxi Province, P. R. China

Received:2019-05-31 Accepted:2019-06-27 Published:2019-12-18
Contact: Sanping Chen E-mail:sanpingchen@126.com
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21727805);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21673180);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21703135);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21803042);Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi(2017JZ002);Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi(2018JM5180);Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi(2019JQ-249);Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi(2019JQ-067);the Project of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Engineering(14JS112);the 64th China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project(2018M643706)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

溶剂分子的存在会严重降低能量金属-有机框架(EMOFs)材料的爆热和稳定性，开发无溶剂的EMOFs已成为制备高能量密度材料的有效策略。本文将高能的2, 3-二(5-1H-四唑基)吡嗪(H₂DTPZ)配体与银离子作用在水热条件下制备了一例无溶剂的EMOF [Ag₂(DTPZ)]_n (1) (含氮量: 32.58%)，并借助元素分析、红外光谱、X射线衍射以及热分析等技术对其组成和结构进行了表征。化合物1中，DTPZ²⁻配体构型高度扭转并以八齿配位模式桥联Ag⁺离子形成三维框架结构(ρ = 2.812 g∙cm⁻³)，配体大的位阻效应和强的配位能力有效阻止了溶剂分子与金属配位或占据框架空腔；同时，不同配体四唑环间强的π-π堆积作用(质心-质心距离为0.34461(1) nm)，使得化合物1呈现高的热稳定性(T_e = 619.1 K, T_p = 658.7 K)。热分析研究表明化合物1分解主要发生一步快速失重并伴有剧烈的放热，呈现出潜在的含能特质。通过差示扫描量热(DSC)技术对化合物1的热分解过程进行了非等温热动力学分析(基于Kissinger和Ozawa-Doyle方法)并获得了相应热动力学参数(活化能E_a = 272.1 kJ·mol⁻¹，E_o = 268.9 kJ·mol⁻¹；lgA =19.67 s⁻¹)。进一步基于升温速率趋于0时的分解峰温和外延起始温度，计算得到了相关热力学参数(活化焓ΔH^≠ = 266.9 kJ·mol^-1，活化熵ΔS^≠ = 125.4 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹，活化自由能ΔG^≠ = 188.3 kJ·mol⁻¹)以及热爆炸临界温度(T_b = 607.1 K)和自加速分解温度(T_SADT = 595.8 K)，结果表明该化合物具有良好的热安全性，其分解属非自发的熵驱动过程。借助精密转动弹热量计测定了化合物1的恒容燃烧能(Q_v)并计算得其标准摩尔生成焓为(2165.99 ± 0.81) kJ·mol⁻¹。爆轰和安全性能测试表明，化合物1对撞击和摩擦均不敏感，爆热值达10.15 kJ·g⁻¹，远高于常见硝铵类炸药奥克托金(HMX)、黑索金(RDX)和2, 4, 6-三硝基甲苯(TNT)，是一例有前景的高能钝感含能材料。

关键词: 含能金属-有机框架, 热分解动力学, 热稳定性, 爆炸性能, 感度

Abstract:

Solvent molecules can significantly reduce the heat of detonation and stability of energetic metal-organic framework (EMOF) materials, and the development of solvent-free EMOFs has become an effective strategy to prepare high-energy density materials. In this study, a solvent-free EMOF, [Ag₂(DTPZ)]_n (1) (N% = 32.58%), was synthesized by reacting a high-energy ligand, 2, 3-di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)pyrazine (H₂DTPZ), with silver ions under hydrothermal conditions, and it was structurally characterized by elemental analysis, infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and thermal analysis. In 1, the DTPZ²⁻ ligands that adopted a highly torsional configuration bridged the Ag⁺ ions in an octadentate coordination mode to form a three-dimensional framework (ρ = 2.812 g∙cm⁻³). The large steric effect and strong coordination ability of DTPZ²⁻ effectively prevented the solvent molecules from binding with the metal centers or occupying the voids of 1. Moreover, the strong π-π stacking interactions [centroid-centroid distance = 0.34461(1) nm] between the tetrazole rings in different DTPZ²⁻ ligands provided a high thermal stability to the framework (T_e = 619.1 K, T_p = 658.7 K). Thermal analysis showed that a one-step rapid weight loss with intense heat release primarily occurred during the decomposition of 1, suggesting potential energetic characteristics. Non-isothermal thermokinetic analyses (based on the Kissinger and Ozawa-Doyle methods) were performed using differential scanning calorimetry to obtain the thermoanalysis kinetic parameters of the thermodecomposition of 1 (E_a = 272.1 kJ·mol⁻¹, E_o = 268.9 kJ·mol⁻¹; lgA =19.67 s⁻¹). The related thermodynamic parameters [enthalpy of activation (ΔH^≠ = 266.9 kJ·mol⁻¹), entropy of activation (ΔS^≠ = 125.4 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹), free energy of activation (ΔG^≠ = 188.3 kJ·mol⁻¹)], critical temperature of thermal explosion (T_b = 607.1 K), and self-accelerating decomposition temperature (T_SADT = 595.8 K) of the decomposition reaction were also calculated based on the decomposition peak temperature and extrapolated onset temperature when the heating rate approached zero. The results revealed that 1 featured good thermal safety, and its decomposition was a non-spontaneous entropy-driven process. The standard molar enthalpy for the formation of 1 was calculated to be (2165.99 ± 0.81) kJ·mol⁻¹ based on its constant volume combustion energy determined using a precise rotating oxygen bomb calorimeter. Detonation and safety performance tests revealed that 1 was insensitive to impact and friction, and its heat of detonation (10.15 kJ·g⁻¹) was higher than that of common ammonium nitrate explosives, such as octogen (HMX), hexogene (RDX), and 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), indicating that 1 is a promising high-energy and insensitive material.

Key words: Energetic metal-organic framework, Thermal decomposition kinetics, Thermal stability, Detonation performance, Sensitivity

MSC2000:

O642

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

乔成芳,吕磊,许文风,夏正强,周春生,陈三平,高胜利. 三维无溶剂含能Ag-MOF的制备、热分解动力学及爆炸性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905085.

Chengfang Qiao,Lei Lü,Wenfeng Xu,Zhengqiang Xia,Chunsheng Zhou,Sanping Chen,Shengli Gao. Synthesis, Thermal Decomposition Kinetics and Detonation Performance of a Three-Dimensional Solvent-Free Energetic Ag(I)-MOF[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(6): 1905085.

图/表 7

Table 1

Table 2

Fig 1

Fig 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

参考文献 42

1	Gao H. ; Shreeve J. M. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7377. doi: 10.1021/cr200039c
2	Thottempudi V. ; Gao H. ; Shreeve J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6464. doi: 10.1021/ja2013455
3	Thottempudi V. ; Shreeve J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19982. doi: 10.1021/ja208990z
4	Joo Y. H. ; Shreeve J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15081. doi: 10.1021/ja107729c
5	Klapötke T. M. ; Stierstorfer J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1122. doi: 10.1021/ja8077522
6	Dippold A. A. ; Klapötke T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9931. doi: 10.1021/ja404164j
7	Mcdonald K. A. ; Seth S. ; Matzger A. J. Cryst. Growth Des. 2015, 15, 5963. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01436
8	Zhang S. ; Yang Q. ; Liu X. Y. ; Qu X. N. ; Wei Q. ; Xie G. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 307, 292. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.08.006
9	Zhang Q. H. ; Shreeve J. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 2540. doi: 10.1002/anie.201310014
10	Zhang J. C. ; Su H. ; Dong Y. L. ; Zhang P. C. ; Du Y. ; Li S. H. ; Gozin M. ; Pang S. P. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 10281. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01122
11	Fu H. R. ; Wang N. ; Qin J. H. ; Han M. L. ; Ma L. F. ; Wang F. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 11645. doi: 10.1039/C8CC05990J
12	Zhang J. H. ; Shreeve J. M. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 2363. doi: 10.1039/C5DT04456A
13	Zhang S. ; Liu X. Y. ; Yang Q. ; Su Z. Y. ; Gao W. J. ; Wei Q. ; Xie G. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. Chem. -Eur. J. 2014, 20, 7906. doi: 10.1002/chem.201402783
14	Qu X. N. ; Zhai L. J. ; Wang B. Z. ; Wei Q. ; Xie G. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 17304. doi: 10.1039/C6DT03631G
15	Song X. X. ; Zhang S. ; Zhao G. W. ; Zhang W. D. ; Chen D. P. ; Yang Q. ; Wei Q. ; Xie G. ; Yang D. S. ; Chen S. P. ; et al RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 93231. doi: 10.1039/C6RA21132A
16	Qu X. N. ; Zhai L. J. ; Xia Z. Q. ; Wang B. Z. ; Yang Q. ; Xie G. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. Chin. J. Energ. Mater. 2018, 26, 937. doi: 10.11934/CJEM2018220
	屈晓妮; 翟连杰; 夏正强; 王伯周; 杨奇; 谢钢; 陈三平; 高胜利. 含能材料, 2018, 26, 937. doi: 10.11934/CJEM2018220
17	Yang Q. ; Yang G. L. ; Zhang W. D. ; Zhang S. ; Yang Z. H. ; Xie G. ; Wei Q. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. Chem. -Eur. J. 2017, 23, 9149. doi: 10.1002/chem.201701325
18	Demko Z. P. ; Sharpless K. B. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 7945. doi: 10.1021/jo010635w
19	Meyer, R.; Köhler, J. Explosives, 4th ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 149.
20	Meyer, R.; Köhler, J. Explosives, 4th ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 197.
21	Yang X. W. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. ; Li H. Y. ; Shi Q. Z. Instrum. Sci. Technol. 2002, 30, 311. doi: 10.1081/Cl-120013509
22	Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS-97, Program for Crystal Structure Solution; University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
23	Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement; University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.
24	Qu X. N. ; Zhang S. ; Wang B. Z. ; Yang Q. ; Han J. ; Wei Q. ; Xie G. ; Chen S. P. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 6968. doi: 10.1039/C6DT00218H
25	Qu X. N. ; Yang Q. ; Han J. ; Wei Q. ; Xie G. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 46212. doi: 10.1039/C6RA07301H
26	Spek, A. L. PLATON, A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool; Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2003.
27	Kissinger H. E. Anal. Chem. 1957, 29, 1702. doi: 10.1021/ac60131a045
28	Ozawa T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1965, 38, 1881. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.38.1881
29	Yi J. H. ; Zhao F. Q. ; Wang B. Z. ; Liu Q. A. ; Zhou C. ; Hu R. Z. ; Ren Y. H. ; Xu S. Y. ; Xu K. Z. ; Ren X. N. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 432. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.029
30	Lv J. Y. ; Chen L. P. ; Chen W. H. ; Gao H. S. ; Peng M. J. Thermochim. Acta 2013, 571, 60. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2013.08.029
31	Zhang T. L. ; Hu R. Z. ; Xie Y. ; Li F. P. Thermochim. Acta 1994, 244, 171. doi: 10.1016/0040-6031(94)80216-5
32	Liu R. ; Zhang T. L. ; Yang L. ; Zhou Z. N. ; Zhang J. G. Chin. J. Explos. and Propell. 2013, 36, 16. doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2013.05.003
	刘芮; 张同来; 杨利; 周遵宁; 张建国. 火炸药学报, 2013, 36, 16. doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2013.05.003
33	Tao Z. ; Ren Y. ; Yang L. ; Zhang T. L. ; Qiao X. J. ; Zhang J. G. ; Zhou Z. N. Chin. J. Explos. and Propell. 2011, 34, 19. doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.01.010
	汤崭; 任雁; 杨利; 张同来; 乔小晶; 张建国; 周遵宁. 火炸药学报, 2011, 34, 19. doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.01.010
34	Gao H. X. ; Zhao F. Q. ; Hu R. Z. ; Pan Q. ; Wang B. Z. ; Yang W. X. ; Gao Y. ; Gao S. L. ; Shi Q. Z. Chin. J. Chem. 2006, 24, 177. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.200690034
35	Lide, D. R. Standard Thermodynamic Properties of Chemical Substances, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Internet Version 2007, 87th ed.; Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007.
36	Kamlet M. J. ; Jacobs S. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 48, 23. doi: 10.1063/1.1667908
37	Wang Y. ; Zhang J. C. ; Su H. ; Li S. H. ; Zhang S. W. ; Pang S. P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 4575. doi: 10.1021/jp502857d
38	Bushuyev O. S. ; Brown P. ; Maiti A. ; Gee R. H. ; Peterson G. R. ; Weeks B. L. ; Hope-Weeks L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1422. doi: 10.1021/ja209640k
39	Shen C. ; Liu Y. ; Zhu Z. Q. ; Xu Y. G. ; Lu M. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 7489. doi: 10.1039/C7CC03869K
40	Li S. H. ; Wang Y. ; Qi C. ; Zhao X. X. ; Zhang J. C. ; Zhang S. W. ; Pang S. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14031. doi: 10.1002/anie.201307118
41	Ma X. H. ; Cai C. ; Sun W. J. ; Song W. M. ; Ma Y. L. ; Liu X. Y. ; Xie G. ; Chen S. P. ; Gao S. L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 9233. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b00834
42	Bushuyev O. S. ; Peterson G. R. ; Brown P. ; Maiti A. ; Gee R. H. ; Weeks B. L. ; Hope-Weeks L. J. Chem. -Eur. J. 2013, 19, 1706. doi: 10.1002/chem.201203610

Parameter	Value
Formula	AgC₃HN₅
Formula weight	214.96
T/K	296(2)
Crystal system	Monoclinic
Space group	C2/c
a/nm	0.69668(10)
b/nm	1.05722(15)
c/nm	1.4007(2)
β/°	100.144(2)
V/nm ³	1.0155(3)
D_c/(g?cm^?3)	2.812
Z	8
Cystal size/mm	0.32 × 0.28 × 0.25
Reflections collected/unique	2873/1111
R_int	0.0212
F(000)	808
μ/mm^?1	3.855
Data/restraints/parameters	1111/0/83
GOF on F²	1.030
R₁^a [I > 2σ(I)]	0.0322
wR₂^b.(all data)	0.1241

Bond	Bond length	Bond	Bond angle
Ag(1)―N(2)	0.2214(3)	N(2)―Ag(1)―N(4a)	139.63(12)
Ag(1)―N(4a)	0.2238(3)	N(2)―Ag(1)―N(3b)	105.60(12)
Ag(1)―N(3b)	0.2481(3)	N(4a)―Ag(1)―N(3b)	101.77(10)
Ag(1)―N(5c)	0.2507(3)	N(2)―Ag(1)―N(5c)	108.56(11)
		N(4a)―Ag(1)―N(5c)	102.21(11)
		N(3b)―Ag(1)―N(5c)	86.32(11)

β/(K?min^?1)	T_p/K	E_k/(kJ?mol^?1)	lg(A_k/s^?1)	R_k	E_o/(kJ?min^?1)	R_o	T_e/K	T_p0/K	ΔH^≠/(kJ?min^?1)	ΔS^≠/(J?min^?1?K^?1)	ΔG^≠/(kJ?min^?1)
2	638.8	272.1	19.67	0.9999	268.9	0.9999	601.2	626.2	266.9	125.4	188.3
					5	650.1	608.5
					8	655.9	615.3
					10	658.7	619.1

Compound	T_e0/K	T_p0/K	T_b/K	T_SADT/K
1	595.8	626.2	607.1	595.8
HMX ²⁹	546.5	?	553.1	546.5
CL-20 ³²	467.4	?	475.2	467.4
RDX ³³	477.2	?	490.6	477.2
FOX-7 ³⁴	479.2	?	480.3	479.2

EMOFs or explosives	ρ/(g?cm^?3) ^a	N/% ^b	T_dec/K ^c	Q/(kJ?g^?1) ^d	D/(km?s^?1) ^e	P/GPa ^f	IS/J ^g	FS/N ^h
1	2.812	32.58	658.7	10.15	8.355	38.89	> 40	> 360
[Ag₁₆(BTFOF)₉]_n·[2(NH₄)]_n ²⁴	1.997	35.36	498.2	3.575	11.810	65.29	> 40	> 360
[Ag₂(DNMAF)]_n ³⁹	2.545	28.83	485.2	9.167	10.242	58.30	8	120
[Ag(atrz)_1.5(NO₃)] ⁴⁰	2.160	43.76	530.2	5.781	7.773	29.70	30	–
[Ag₇(tza)₃(Htza)₂(H₂tza)(H₂O)]_n ⁴¹	2.572	21.90	533.2	8.037	8.016	34.54	> 40	> 360
CHHP ⁴²	2.000	25.58	504.2	3.139	6.205	17.96	0.8	–
ZnHHP ⁴²	2.117	23.61	566.2	2.930	7.016	23.58	–	–
HMX ³⁸	1.950	37.80	560.2	5.525	8.900	38.39	7.4	–
RDX ³⁸	1.806	37.80	483.2	6.028	8.600	33.92	7.5	120
TNT ³⁸	1.654	18.50	517.2	5.107	7.178	20.50	15	353

三维无溶剂含能Ag-MOF的制备、热分解动力学及爆炸性能

Synthesis, Thermal Decomposition Kinetics and Detonation Performance of a Three-Dimensional Solvent-Free Energetic Ag(I)-MOF

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	苗静,郭睿凤,刘志宏. BaO∙4B₂O₃∙5H₂O纳米材料的制备及其对聚丙烯阻燃性能的热分解动力学方法评价[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905052 -0 .
[2]	席双惠,王繁,李象远. 典型燃料点火延迟时间的一阶和二阶局部和全局敏感度分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(2): 167 -181 .
[3]	陈文君,薛智敏,王晋芳,蒋静云,赵新辉,牟天成. 低共熔溶剂的热稳定性研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 904 -911 .
[4]	卢鹏飞,苟于单,何九宁,李萍,张昌华,李象远. 戊酸甲酯高温点火的激波管研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(6): 618 -624 .
[5]	鄢慧君,李彪,蒋宁,夏定国. 阴离子硫氧化还原与Li_1-xNiO_2-yS_y的结构稳定性:第一性原理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1781 -1788 .
[6]	张巍锋,鲜雷勇,雍康乐,何九宁,张昌华,李萍,李象远. 正十一烷/空气在宽温度范围下着火延迟的激波管研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(9): 2216 -2222 .
[7]	李红梅,兰丽,陈山虎,刘达玉,王卫,龚茂初,陈耀强. 复合沉淀剂制备的CeO₂-ZrO₂-Al₂O₃材料及其负载的单Pd三效催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(7): 1734 -1746 .
[8]	武娜, 骆群, 吴振武, 马昌期. 电极界面缓冲层对P3HT:PC₆₁BM太阳能电池热稳定性的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(7): 1413 -1420 .
[9]	何九宁, 李有亮, 张昌华, 李萍, 李象远. 十氢萘/空气混合物高温着火延迟的激波管测量[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(5): 836 -842 .
[10]	李宪华, 张雷刚, 王雪雪, 于清波. 界面聚合法制备PANI/g-C₃N₄复合催化剂及其热稳定性和可见光催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(4): 764 -770 .
[11]	徐佳琪, 郭俊江, 刘爱科, 王健礼, 谈宁馨, 李象远. RP-3替代燃料自点火燃烧机理构建及动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(4): 643 -652 .
[12]	孙盼盼, 刘翔宇, 孙琳, 张盛, 魏青, 尹琰, 杨奇, 陈三平. 分子间作用力构筑的具有柔性结构的醋氯芬酸多聚物: 晶体结构, 热稳定性, 溶解度和DFT计算[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(2): 211 -220 .
[13]	李静,陈丽珍,王建龙,兰贯超,侯欢,李满. 合成黑索今中副产物3, 5-二硝基-1-氧-3, 5-二氮杂环己烷的晶体结构及热分解动力学[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(11): 2049 -2056 .
[14]	于惠梅, 潘秀红, 张明辉, 刘岩, 余建定. Nd³⁺/Yb³⁺离子共掺的氧化钛基上转换发光玻璃的热学和力学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(2): 227 -231 .
[15]	宋华杰, 周婷婷, 黄风雷, 洪滔. 低压长脉冲载荷下β-HMX单晶滑移系的微观物理化学响应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(11): 2024 -2034 .