Ni2P纳米片用于光催化二氧化碳还原

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906014

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

光催化还原二氧化碳是人工光合作用的重要组成部分，但由于还原二氧化碳的活化能过高导致其应用受到极大地限制。这里，我们报道Ni₂P材料耦合光敏剂能够实现高效的光催化二氧化碳还原。此外，为了进一步的提高二氧化碳还原性能，一种合成超薄片层结构Ni₂P纳米片的策略被采用，目的提高其对二氧化碳吸附能力和降低二氧化碳还原的活化能。一系列物理化学表征被实施，比如X射线衍射(XRD)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)和原子力显微镜(AFM)等。这些实验结果证实了厚度为1.5 nm的超薄Ni₂P纳米片被成功地制备。荧光实验结果揭示了Ni₂P纳米片能够更高效地促进光生载流子的分离。此外，电化学实验证明了Ni₂P纳米片具有较高的活性比表面积和电荷导电性，因此可以为二氧化碳转化提供更多的活性中心，从而加快其界面反应动力学。光催化二氧化碳还原实验结果展现了Ni₂P纳米片光催化一氧化碳的生成速率为64.8 μmol·h^-1，且其活性是Ni₂P颗粒光催化二氧化碳还原活性的四倍，同时它展现出较高化学稳定性。这项工作为超薄Ni₂P纳米片在光催化二氧化碳中的应用提供了新的思路。

关键词: 光催化, 纳米片, 磷化镍, 二氧化碳还原, 一氧化碳

Abstract:

Artificial photosynthesis is an ideal method for solar-to-chemical energy conversion, wherein solar energy is stored in the form of chemical bonds of solar fuels. In particular, the photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ has attracted considerable attention due to its dual benefits of fossil fuel production and CO₂ pollution reduction. However, CO₂ is a comparatively stable molecule and its photoreduction is thermodynamically and kinetically challenging. Thus, the photocatalytic efficiency of CO₂ reduction is far below the level of industrial applications. Therefore, development of low-cost cocatalysts is crucial for significantly decreasing the activation energy of CO₂ to achieving efficient photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Herein, we have reported the use of a Ni₂P material that can serve as a robust cocatalyst by cooperating with a photosensitizer for the photoconversion of CO₂. An effective strategy for engineering Ni₂P in an ultrathin layered structure has been proposed to improve the CO₂ adsorption capability and decrease the CO₂ activation energy, resulting in efficient CO₂ reduction. A series of physicochemical characterizations including X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to demonstrate the successful preparation of ultrathin Ni₂P nanosheets. The XRD and XPS results confirm the successful synthesis of Ni₂P from Ni(OH)₂ by a low temperature phosphidation process. According to the TEM images, the prepared Ni₂P nanosheets exhibit a 2D and near-transparent sheet-like structure, suggesting their ultrathin thickness. The AFM images further demonstrated this result and also showed that the height of the Ni₂P nanosheets is ca 1.5 nm. The photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy results revealed that the Ni₂P material could efficiently promote the separation of the photogenerated electrons and holes in [Ru(bpy)₃]Cl₂·6H₂O. More importantly, the Ni₂P nanosheets could more efficiently promote the charge transfer and charge separation rate of [Ru(bpy)₃]Cl₂·6H₂O compared with the Ni₂P particles. In addition, the electrochemical experiments revealed that the Ni₂P nanosheets, with their high active surface area and charge conductivity, can provide more active centers for CO₂ conversion and accelerate the interfacial reaction dynamics. These results strongly suggest that the Ni₂P nanosheets are a promising material for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction, and can achieve a CO generation rate of 64.8 μmol·h^-1, which is 4.4 times higher than that of the Ni₂P particles. In addition, the XRD and XPS measurements of the used Ni₂P nanosheets after the six cycles of the photocatalytic CO₂ reduction reaction demonstrated their high stability. Overall, this study offers a new function for the 2D transition-metal phosphide catalysts in photocatalytic CO₂ reduction.

Key words: Photocatalysis, Nanosheet, Ni₂P, CO₂ reduction, CO

MSC2000:

O643

潘志明,刘明辉,牛萍萍,郭芳松,付贤智,王心晨. Ni₂P纳米片用于光催化二氧化碳还原[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1906014.

Zhiming Pan,Minghui Liu,Pingping Niu,Fangsong Guo,Xianzhi Fu,Xinchen Wang. Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Using Ni₂P Nanosheets[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(1): 1906014.

图/表 7

Scheme 1

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

参考文献 61

1	Asadi M. ; Kim K. ; Liu C. ; Addepalli A. V. ; Abbasi P. ; Yasaei P. ; Phillips P. ; Behranginia A. ; Cerrato J. M. ; Haasch R. ; et al Science 2016, 353, 467. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4767
2	Wang S. ; Wang X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2308. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507145
3	Qin J. ; Wang S. ; Ren H. ; Hou Y. ; Wang X. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 179, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.005
4	Wang Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Zhang L. ; Luo Z. ; Shen J. ; Lin H. ; Long J. ; Wu J. C. S. ; Fu X. ; Wang X. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 14595. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b09344
5	Pan Z. ; Zheng Y. ; Guo F. ; Niu P. ; Wang X. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 87. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600850
6	Liang F. ; Lindberg P. ; Lindblad P. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2018, 2, 2583. doi: 10.1039/C8SE00281A
7	Pan, Z.; Zhang, G.; Wang, X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 7102, 7102. doi: 10.1002/anie.201902634
8	Lan Z. A. ; Wang X. C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 457. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201701061
	蓝志安; 王心晨. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 457. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201701061
9	Kuriki R. ; Sekizawa K. ; Ishitani O. ; Maeda K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2406. doi: 10.1002/anie.201411170
10	Wu L. Y. ; Mu Y. F. ; Guo X. X. ; Zhang W. ; Zhang Z. M. ; Zhang M. ; Lu T. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 9491. doi: 10.1002/anie.201904537
11	Zhai Q. ; Xie S. ; Fan W. ; Zhang Q. ; Wang Y. ; Deng W. ; Wang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5776. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301473
12	Shown I. ; Samireddi S. ; Chang Y. C. ; Putikam R. ; Chang P. H. ; Sabbah A. ; Fu F. Y. ; Chen W. F. ; Wu C. I. ; Yu T. Y. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 169. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02547-4
13	Qin J. ; Wang S. ; Wang X. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 209, 476. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.018
14	Kuriki R. ; Matsunaga H. ; Nakashima T. ; Wada K. ; Yamakata A. ; Ishitani O. ; Maeda K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 5159. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b01997
15	Kang Q. ; Wang T. ; Li P. ; Liu L. ; Chang K. ; Li M. ; Ye J. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 855. doi: 10.1002/ange.201409183
16	Cometto C. ; Kuriki R. ; Chen L. ; Maeda K. ; Lau T. C. ; Ishitani O. ; Robert M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7437. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b04007
17	Pei Z. ; Li H. ; Huang Y. ; Xue Q. ; Huang Y. ; Zhu M. ; Wang Z. ; Zhi C. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 742. doi: 10.1039/C6EE03265F
18	Wang S. ; Guan B. Y. ; Lou X. W. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 306. doi: 10.1039/C7EE02934A
19	Zheng Y. ; Lin L. ; Ye X. ; Guo F. ; Wang X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11926. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407319
20	Wang S. ; Wang X. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 162, 494. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.026
21	Kuriki R. ; Yamamoto M. ; Higuchi K. ; Yamamoto Y. ; Akatsuka M. ; Lu D. ; Yagi S. ; Yoshida T. ; Ishitani O. ; Maeda K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 4867. doi: 10.1002/anie.201701627
22	Ouyang T. ; Wang H. J. ; Huang H. H. ; Wang J. W. ; Guo S. ; Liu W. J. ; Zhong D. C. ; Lu T. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16480. doi: 10.1002/anie.201811010
23	Ouyang T. ; Huang H. H. ; Wang J. W. ; Zhong D. C. ; Lu T. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 738. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610607
24	Wang S. ; Wang X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 55, 2308. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507145
25	Fu J. ; Zhu B. ; Jiang C. ; Cheng B. ; You W. ; Yu J. Small 2017, 13, 1603938. doi: 10.1002/smll.201603938
26	Apaydin D. H. ; Portenkirchner E. ; Jintanalert P. ; Strauss M. ; Luangchaiyaporn J. ; Sariciftci N. S. ; Thamyongkit P. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2018, 2, 2747. doi: 10.1039/C8SE00422F
27	Yang Y. ; Ajmal S. ; Zheng X. ; Zhang L. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2018, 2, 510. doi: 10.1039/C7SE00371D
28	Carenco S. ; Portehault D. ; Boissière C. ; Mézailles N. ; Sanchez C. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 371. doi: 10.1002/adma.201303198
29	Shi Y. ; Zhang B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1529. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00434A
30	Liu Q. ; Tian J. ; Cui W. ; Jiang P. ; Cheng N. ; Asiri A. M. ; Sun X. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 6828. doi: 10.1002/ange.201404161
31	Tian J. ; Liu Q. ; Asiri A. M. ; Sun X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7587. doi: 10.1021/ja503372r
32	Li D. ; Baydoun H. ; Verani C. N. ; Brock S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4006. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b01543
33	Yu X. Y. ; Feng Y. ; Guan B. ; Lou X. W. ; Paik U. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1246. doi: 10.1039/C6EE00100A
34	Stern L. A. ; Feng L. ; Song F. ; Hu X. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2347. doi: 10.1039/C5EE01155H
35	Pan Z. ; Niu P. ; Hou Y. ; Fang Y. ; Liu M. ; Wang X. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 1911. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201801691
36	Indra A. ; Acharjya A. ; Menezes P. W. ; Merschjann C. ; Hollmann D. ; Schwarze M. ; Aktas M. ; Friedrich A. ; Lochbrunner S. ; Thomas A. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1653. doi: 10.1002/anie.201611605
37	Sun Z. ; Zheng H. ; Li J. ; Du P. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2668. doi: 10.1039/C5EE01310K
38	Sun X. ; Lu L. ; Zhu Q. ; Wu C. ; Yang D. ; Chen C. ; Han B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2427. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712221
39	Calvinho K. U. D. ; Laursen A. B. ; Yap K. M. K. ; Goetjen T. A. ; Hwang S. ; Murali N. ; Mejia-Sosa B. ; Lubarski A. ; Teeluck K. M. ; Hall E. S. ; et al Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2550. doi: 10.1039/C8EE00936H
40	Fu Z. C. ; Xu R. C. ; Moore J. T. ; Liang F. ; Nie X. C. ; Mi C. ; Mo J. ; Xu Y. ; Xu Q. Q. ; Yang Z. ; et al Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 4273. doi: 10.1002/chem.201800335
41	Wang S. ; Guan B. Y. ; Lu Y. ; Lou X. W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17305. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10733
42	Wang S. ; Guan B. Y. ; Lou X. W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5037. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b02200
43	Chen Y. ; Jia G. ; Hu Y. ; Fan G. ; Tsang Y. H. ; Li Z. ; Zou Z. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 1875. doi: 10.1039/C7SE00344G
44	Li F. ; Chen L. ; Knowles G. P. ; MacFarlane D. R. ; Zhang J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 505. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608279
45	Tu W. ; Zhou Y. ; Liu Q. ; Tian Z. ; Gao J. ; Chen X. ; Zhang H. ; Liu J. ; Zou Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1215. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201102566
46	Cao S. ; Shen B. ; Tong T. ; Fu J. ; Yu J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800136. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201800136
47	Ou H. ; Lin L. ; Zheng Y. ; Yang P. ; Fang Y. ; Wang X. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700008. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700008
48	Pu Z. ; Wei S. ; Chen Z. ; Mu S. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 196, 193. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.027
49	Gao C. ; Meng Q. ; Zhao K. ; Yin H. ; Wang D. ; Guo J. ; Zhao S. ; Chang L. ; He M. ; Li Q. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6485. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601387
50	Jiang J. ; Zhao K. ; Xiao X. ; Zhang L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4473. doi: 10.1021/ja210484t
51	Yu J. ; Low J. ; Xiao W. ; Zhou P. ; Jaroniec M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8839. doi: 10.1021/ja5044787
52	Jia J. ; Qian C. ; Dong Y. ; Li Y. F. ; Wang H. ; Ghoussoub M. ; Butler K. T. ; Walsh A. ; Ozin G. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4631. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00026J
53	Li F. ; Xue M. ; Li J. ; Ma X. ; Chen L. ; Zhang X. ; MacFarlane D. R. ; Jie Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 14718. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710038
54	Zhao Y. ; Chen G. ; Bian T. ; Zhou C. ; Waterhouse G. I. N. ; Wu L. Z. ; Tung C. H. ; Smith L. J. ; O'Hare D. ; Zhang T. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7824. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503730
55	Yao T. ; Liu L. ; Xiao C. ; Zhang X. ; Liu Q. ; Wei S. ; Xie Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7554. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302891
56	Popczun E. J. ; McKone J. R. ; Read C. G. ; Biacchi A. J. ; Wiltrout A. M. ; Lewis N. S. ; Schaak R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9267. doi: 10.1021/ja403440e
57	Tang C. ; Zhang R. ; Lu W. ; Wang Z. ; Liu D. ; Hao S; Du ; G . ; Asiri A.M. ; Sun X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 842. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608899
58	Bai Y. ; Zhang H. ; Li X. ; Liu L. ; Xu H. ; Qiu H. ; Wang Y. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 1446. doi: 10.1039/C4NR05862C
59	Wang S. ; Wang X. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 162, 494. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.026
60	Chen Y. ; Wang B. ; Lin S. ; Zhang Y. ; Wang X. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 29981. doi: 10.1021/jp510187c
61	Wang S. ; Hou Y. ; Wang X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 4327. doi: 10.1021/am508766s

[1]	覃方红,万婷,邱江源,王一惠,肖碧源,黄在银. 基于光微热量-荧光光谱联用技术研究光催化热力学和动力学的温度效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905087 -0 .
[2]	卢晓霞,董升阳,陈志杰,吴朗源,张校刚. 碳包覆Ti₂Nb₂O₉纳米片的制备及其储钠性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(5): 1906024 -0 .
[3]	潘金波,申升,周威,唐杰,丁洪志,王进博,陈浪,区泽堂,尹双凤. 光催化制氢研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1905068 -0 .
[4]	许振民,卞振锋. 光催化甲烷转化研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1907013 -0 .
[5]	曹丹,安华,严孝清,赵宇鑫,杨贵东,梅辉. SiC/Pt/CdS纳米棒Z型异质结的制备及其高效光催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1901051 -0 .
[6]	陈锐杰,李娣,方振远,黄元勇,罗必富,施伟东. In₂O₃三维纳米结构的控制合成及高效光解水产氢活性研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1903047 -0 .
[7]	李小为,王彬,尹文轩,狄俊,夏杰祥,朱文帅,李华明. Cu²⁺改性g-C₃N₄光催化剂的光催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1902001 -0 .
[8]	孙尚聪,张旭雅,刘显龙,潘伦,张香文,邹吉军. 光催化全解水助催化剂的设计与构建[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1905007 -0 .
[9]	孙万军,林军奇,梁向明,杨峻懿,马宝春,丁勇. 基于立方烷结构的分子催化剂在光催化水氧化中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1905025 -0 .
[10]	段树华,巫树锋,王磊,佘厚德,黄静伟,王其召. 棒状金属有机框架结构PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料的制备及其高效光催化CO₂还原性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1905086 -0 .
[11]	王亦清,沈少华. 非金属掺杂石墨相氮化碳光催化的研究进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1905080 -0 .
[12]	魏风,毕宏晖,焦帅,何孝军. 超级电容器用相互连接的类石墨烯纳米片[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1903043 -0 .
[13]	梁旭,贾宇峰,刘宗怀,雷志斌. 碳海绵上电化学沉积Fe₂O₃纳米片及其增强电容性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1903034 -0 .
[14]	张舒怡,鲍静娴,吴博,钟良枢,孙予罕. 甲烷/甲醇光催化转化研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 923 -939 .
[15]	母晓玥,李路. 室温光驱动甲烷活化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 968 -976 .

Ni₂P纳米片用于光催化二氧化碳还原

Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Using Ni₂P Nanosheets

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 61

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10