非离子表面活性剂Brij 30诱导离子液体型表面活性剂C16imC8Br蠕虫状胶束向凝胶的转变

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201909049

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

蠕虫状胶束和小分子水凝胶是由具有粘弹性的三维网络构成。但它们具有不同的粘弹性。蠕虫状胶束以黏性为主，这主要是由暂时平衡的网络决定。凝胶以弹性为主，三维网状结构稳定。在某些情况下，蠕虫状的胶束通过网络结构的增强可以转化为凝胶。在我们之前的研究中发现由离子液体型表面活性剂1-十六烷基-3-辛基咪唑溴化铵([C₁₆imC₈]Br)形成的蠕虫状胶束在不含添加剂时，具有较高的粘弹性。非离子表面活性剂十二烷基聚氧四乙烯醚(Brij 30)的加入有望通过静电作用和疏水相互作用增强([C₁₆imC₈]Br蠕虫状胶束的粘弹性，促进蠕虫状胶束向凝胶的转变。利用流变学和冷冻刻蚀透射电镜研究了具有Brij 30的蠕虫状胶束的微观形貌和粘弹性随浓度的变化。采用流变学方法研究了Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br凝胶的热稳定性和凝胶-溶胶转变温度。通过zeta电位测量和核磁共振研究了Brij 30和[C₁₆imC₈]Br之间的相互作用。在[C₁₆imC₈]Br的不同初始浓度下，Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br样品的粘弹性随Brij 30浓度的增大先增大后减小。在一定的Brij 30浓度下，Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br样品具有凝胶的流变特性。[C₁₆imC₈]Br (4.06% (w，质量分数))/Brij 30凝胶的黏弹性最大值出现在Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br的摩尔比(Mr)为4.55时。Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br凝胶的粘弹性与凝胶的活化能呈正相关。Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br凝胶的凝胶-溶胶转变温度也随着Brij30浓度的增加先升高后降低。Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br (4.06% (w))凝胶的最大值出现在Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br的摩尔比为2.93时。Brij 30浓度对Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br凝胶的粘弹性、热稳定性和凝胶-溶胶转变温度有很大影响。zeta电位和核磁氢谱测量结果表明，电中性Brij 30分子在疏水作用下插入到[C₁₆imC₈]Br虫状胶束的栅栏层。它减少了[C₁₆imC₈]Br头基之间的静电斥力，这种斥力导致了蠕虫状胶束的快速生长和更强的网状结构的形成。最后，蠕虫状胶束转变成凝胶。所得结果将有助于更好地理解蠕虫状胶束与凝胶之间的关系，具有潜在的工业和技术应用价值。

关键词: 蠕虫状胶束, 凝胶, 离子液体型表面活性剂, 十二烷基聚氧四乙烯醚, 活化能, 转变

Abstract:

Wormlike micelles and low-molecular-weight hydrogels are composed of three-dimensional networks that endow them with viscoelasticity, but their viscoelastic properties are markedly different. The viscosity of wormlike micelles is attributed to a transient network, while that of gels is due to a stable network. Under certain conditions, wormlike micelles can undergo transition to gels with an increase in the density of the network. In our previous study, we found that the wormlike micelle formed by the ionic liquid-type surfactant 1-hexadecyl-3-octyl imidazolium bromide ([C₁₆imC₈]Br) without any additive has high viscoelasticity. The inclusion of a nonionic surfactant polyoxyethylene lauryl ether (Brij 30) is expected to enhance the viscoelasticity of [C₁₆imC₈]Br wormlike micelles via electrostatic shielding and strong hydrophobic interactions, which may be the driving factor for the wormlike micelle-to-gel structural transition. The morphology and viscoelasticity of [C₁₆imC₈]Br wormlike micelles with Brij 30 were studied as a function of concentration by rheological measurements and freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy. The thermal stability and gel-sol transition temperature of the Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br gels were studied using rheology. The interaction between Brij 30 and [C₁₆imC₈]Br was studied by zeta potential measurements and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Upon the inclusion of Brij 30 into the [C₁₆imC₈]Br wormlike micelles, the viscoelasticity of the Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br samples first increased and then decreased with an increase in the Brij 30 concentration, at different initial concentrations of [C₁₆imC₈]Br. At a certain Brij 30 concentration, the Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br samples rheologically behaved as a gel. The maximum viscoelasticity of the [C₁₆imC₈]Br (4.06% (w))/Brij 30 gel was observed at a Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br molar ratio of 4.55. The viscoelasticity of the Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br gels was positively correlated with the activation energy of the gels. The gel-sol transition temperature of the Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br gels also increased first and then decreased with an increase in the Brij 30 concentration. The highest gel-sol transition temperature of the Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br (4.06% (w)) gel was observed at a Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br molar ratio of 2.93. The Brij 30 concentration had a notable impact on the viscoelasticity, thermal stability, and gel-sol transition temperature of the Brij 30/[C₁₆imC₈]Br gels. The zeta potential and ¹H NMR measurements revealed that the neutral Brij 30 molecules are inserted into the palisade layer of the [C₁₆imC₈]Br wormlike micelles via hydrophobic interactions. This decreased the electrostatic repulsion between the [C₁₆imC₈]Br headgroups, which in turn induced the rapid growth of wormlike micelles and the formation of a stiffer network structure. Finally, the wormlike micelles underwent a structural transition to gels. The obtained results would aid in better understanding the relationship between wormlike micelles and gels, and may be of potential value for industrial and technological applications.

Key words: Wormlike micelle, Gel, Ionic liquid-typed surfactant, Brij 30, Activation energy, Transition

MSC2000:

O648

胡益民, 韩杰, 郭荣. 非离子表面活性剂Brij 30诱导离子液体型表面活性剂C₁₆imC₈Br蠕虫状胶束向凝胶的转变[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1909049.

Yimin Hu, Jie Han, Rong Guo. Wormlike Micelle to Gel Transition Induced by Brij 30 in Ionic Liquid-Type Surfactant Aqueous Solution[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(10): 1909049.

图/表 9

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Table 1

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

参考文献 53

1	Carnall J. M. ; Waudby A. ; Belenguer C. A. ; Stuart A. M. ; Otto M. C. A Science 2010, 327, 1502. doi: 10.1126/science.1182767
2	He X. ; Aizenberg M. ; Kuksenok O. ; Zarzar L. D. ; Shastri A. ; Balazs A. ; Aizenberg C Nature 2012, 487, 214. doi: 10.1038/nature11223
3	He X. ; Aizenberg M. ; Kuksenok O. ; Zarzar L. D. ; Shastri A. ; Balazs A. ; Aizenberg C Nature 2012, 487, 214. doi: 10.1038/nature11223
4	Chu Z. L. ; Dreiss C. A. ; Feng Y. J Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7174. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35490c
5	Stuart M. A. C. ; Huck W. T. S. ; Genzer J. ; Muller M. ; Szleifer I. ; Minko S Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 101. doi: 10.1038/NMAT2614
6	Wang H. ; Tang X. M. ; Eike D. M. ; Larson R. G. ; Koenig P. H Langmuir 2018, 34, 1564. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03552
7	Shi H. F. ; Wang Y. ; Fang B. ; Talmon Y. ; Ge W. ; Raghavan S. R. ; Zakin J. L Langmuir 2011, 27, 5806. doi: 10.1021/la200080w
8	Wu X. P. ; Wu Y. N. ; Yang S. ; Zhao M. W. ; Gao M. W. ; Li H. ; Dai C. L Soft Matter 2016, 12, 4549. doi: 10.1039/c6sm00415f
9	Sun B. ; Fu T. J. ; Zeng H. C Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 7030. doi: 10.1039/C8CC03236J
10	Hu Y. M. ; Han J. ; Ge L. L. ; Guo R Soft Matter 2018, 14, 789. doi: 10.1039/c7sm02223a
11	Banerjee S. L. ; Swift T. ; Hoskins R. ; Rimmer S. ; Singha N. K J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 1475. doi: 10.1039/C8TB02852D
12	Zhang L. ; Li S. L. ; Squillaci M. A. ; Zhong X. L. ; Yao Y. F. ; Orgiu E. ; Samorì P J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 14406. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04347
13	Singh B. ; Varshney L. ; Sharma V Colloids Surf. B: Biointer. 2014, 121, 230. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.020
14	Thankam F. G. ; Muthu J J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 457, 52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.06.034
15	Du M. C. ; Zhu Y. M. ; Yuan L. H. ; Liang H Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2013, 434, 78. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.044
16	Che Y. X. ; Anatoly Z. ; Murata S. J J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 445, 364. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.01.010
17	Lescanne M. ; Grondin P. ; Ale'o A. ; Fages F. ; Pozzo J. L Langmuir 2004, 20, 3032. doi: 10.1021/la035219g
18	Xavier D. H. ; Nicholas B. ; Nataliya Y. ; Gabriel C. ; Nitschke J. R J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3158. doi: 10.1021/ja110575s
19	Paulusse M. J. ; Beek D. J. ; Sijbesma M J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2392. doi: 10.1021/ja067523c
20	Peng F. ; Li G. ; Liu X. ; Wu S. ; Tong Z J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16166. doi: 10.1021/ja807087z
21	Debnath A. ; Ayappa K. G. ; Kumaran V. ; Maiti P. K J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 10660. doi: 10.1021/jp901551d
22	Koynova R. L. ; MacDonald R. C J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 7786. doi: 10.1021/jp071286y
23	Wang Y. ; Xing P. ; Li S. ; Ma M. ; Yang M. ; Zhang Y Langmuir 2016, 32, 10705. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02478
24	Qiao Y. ; Lin Y. Y. ; Wang Y. J. ; Huang J. B Langmuir 2011, 27, 1718. doi: 10.1021/la104447d
25	Raghavan S. R. ; Kaler E. W Langmuir 2001, 17, 300. doi: 10.1021/la0007933
26	Hu Y. M. ; Han J. ; Ge L. L. ; Guo R Soft Matter 2015, 11, 5624. doi: 10.1039/c5sm01084e
27	Hu Y. M. ; Han J. ; Ge L. L. ; Guo R Langmuir 2015, 31, 12618. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03382
28	Dou Y. Y. ; Long P. F. ; Dong S. L. ; Hao J. C Langmuir 2013, 29, 12901. doi: 10.1021/la402993y
29	Wang L. H. ; Zhao W. R. ; Dong R. H. ; Hao J. C Langmuir 2016, 32, 8366. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01596
30	Cao Y. Y. ; Wang D. ; Zhou P. ; Zhao Y. R. ; Sun Y. W Langmuir 2017, 33, 5446. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00405
31	Menger F. M. ; Seredyuk V. A. ; Apkarian R. P. ; Wright E. R J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12408. doi: 10.1021/ja021025w
32	Yue H. ; Guo P. ; Guo R J. Chem. Eng. Data 2009, 54, 2923. doi: 10.1021/je900023t
33	Seiffert S. ; Sprakel J Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 909. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15191f
34	Appel E. A. ; del Barrio J. ; Loh X. J. ; Scherman O. A Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6195. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35264h
35	Wojtecki R. J. ; Meador M. A. ; Rowan S. J Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 14. doi: 10.1038/NMAT2891
36	Fan H. ; Li B. ; Yan Y. ; Huang J. B. ; Kang W Soft Matter 2014, 10, 4506. doi: 10.1039/c4sm00098f
37	Zhao Y. R. ; Chen X. ; Jing B. ; Wang X. D. ; Ma F. M J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 983. doi: 10.1021/jp809048u
38	Lin Y. Y. ; Qiao Y. ; Yan Y. ; Huang J. B Soft Matter 2009, 5, 3047. doi: 10.1039/b906960g
39	Li H. ; Wei S. Q. ; Qing C. L. ; Yang J. S J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 258, 40. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9797[02]00077-2
40	Ramasamy P. ; El-Maghrabi M. R. ; Halada G. ; Miller L. M. ; Rafailovich M Langmuir 2007, 23, 2021. doi: 10.1021/la062365o
41	Shukla A. ; Rehage H Langmuir 2008, 24, 8507. doi: 10.1021/la800816e
42	Lin C. H. ; Chaudhury M. K Langmuir 2008, 24, 14276. doi: 10.1021/la8027572
43	Lai V. M. F. ; Wong P. A. L. ; Li C. Y J. Food Sci. 2000, 65, 1332. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb10607.x
44	Stemfka K. ; Michael G Langmuir 2008, 24, 10123. doi: 10.1021/la801452z
45	Han C. H. ; Guo Y. ; Chen X. X. ; Yao M. H. ; Zhang Y. T. ; Zhang Q. R. ; Wei X. L Soft Matter 2017, 13, 1171. doi: 10.1039/c6sm02654k
46	Fischer P. ; Rehage H Langmuir 1997, 13, 7012. doi: 10.1021/LA970571D
47	Firestone M. A. ; Dzielawa J. A. ; Zapol P. ; Curtiss L. A. ; Seifert S. ; Dietz M. L. ; Kakehashi R. M. ; Shizuma S. J J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 289, 498. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.03.090
48	Huang X. ; Han Y. C. ; Wang Y. X. ; Wang Y. L J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 12439. doi: 10.1021/jp0731046
49	Fielding L. A. ; Lane J. A. ; Derry M. J. ; Mykhaylyk O. O. ; Armes S. P J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5790. doi: 10.1021/ja501756h
50	Shi L. ; Zheng L J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 2162. doi: 10.1021/jp211338k
51	Kumar R. ; Kalur G. C. ; Ziserman L. ; Danino D. ; Raghavan S. R Langmuir 2007, 23, 12849. doi: 10.1021/la7028559
52	Love C. S. ; Hirst A. R. ; Chechik V. ; Smith D. K. ; Ashworth I. ; Brennan C Langmuir 2004, 20, 6580. doi: 10.1021/la049575q
53	Chen Y. L. ; Lv Y. X. ; Han Y. ; Zhu B. ; Zhang F. ; Bo Z. S. ; Liu C. Y Langmuir 2009, 25, 8548. doi: 10.1021/la803436h

c_{Brij 30} (%, w)	E_a/(kJ·mol^?1)
7.70	14.5
8.80	16.6
11.4	23.2
13.6	55.1
15.7	51.4

[1]	滕浩天, 王文涛, 韩晓峰, 郝翔, 杨瑞枝, 田景华. 柔性锌-空气电池进展与展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(1): 2107017 -0 .
[2]	李晓明, 高逸丹, 孔庆强, 谢莉婧, 刘卓, 郭晓倩, 刘燕珍, 卫贤贤, 杨晓, 张兴华, 陈成猛. 高结构稳定性、低泄漏率三维铜@石墨烯复合相变材料的制备[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(1): 2012091 - .
[3]	包玉菲, 冯立纲. PdNi/石墨烯气凝胶电催化甲酸氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2008031 - .
[4]	安惠芳, 姜莉, 李峰, 吴平, 朱晓舒, 魏少华, 周益明. 基于水凝胶衍生的硅/碳纳米管/石墨烯纳米复合材料及储锂性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(7): 1905034 - .
[5]	任宁,王昉,张建军,郑新芳. 热分析动力学研究方法的新进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905062 - .
[6]	刘同庆, 薛芳芳, 易萍, 夏志宇, 董金凤, 李学丰. 基于甲氧肉桂酸衍生物光控分子构建光响应蠕虫状胶束的结构性质关系[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1910004 - .
[7]	汪含笑, 徐俪菲, 刘鸣华. 基于两亲性喹喔啉的超分子凝胶：手性信号反转以及多重响应手性光学开关[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1910036 - .
[8]	焦建梅,徐桂英,辛霞. 胆酸盐参与的自组装及微纳米材料制备[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 684 -696 .
[9]	刘恒昌,冯玉军. CO₂诱导的五嵌段非离子共聚物与阴离子氟碳表面活性剂的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 408 -414 .
[10]	夏慧芸,耿通,赵旭,李芳芳,王凤燕,高莉宁. 基于ZnS纳米粒子的有机凝胶荧光薄膜的制备及其传感性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3): 337 -344 .
[11]	王庆庆, 王锦玲, 姜胜祥, 李平云. 溶胶-凝胶法设计与制备金属及合金纳米材料的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(11): 1186 -1206 .
[12]	尹凡华,谭凯. 符合独立五元环规则的C₁₀₀(417)Cl₂₈形成机理的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 256 -262 .
[13]	赵文荣,郝京诚,HeinzHoffmann. 磁性非对称双链长表面活性剂囊泡凝胶[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1655 -1664 .
[14]	廖友好,李伟善. 锂离子电池凝胶聚合物隔膜的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1533 -1547 .
[15]	陈爱喜,汪宏,段赛,张海明,徐昕,迟力峰. 电势诱导的N-异丁酰基-L-半胱氨酸分子在金(111)表面的相转变[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(5): 1010 -1016 .

非离子表面活性剂Brij 30诱导离子液体型表面活性剂C₁₆imC₈Br蠕虫状胶束向凝胶的转变

Wormlike Micelle to Gel Transition Induced by Brij 30 in Ionic Liquid-Type Surfactant Aqueous Solution

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 53

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0