胺和水插层磷酸锰仿生模拟氢键网络用于电催化水氧化

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007031

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

自然界光合作用的析氧催化剂为不对称锰簇结构。催化中心除了自身特殊的结构外，还与周围氨基酸残基和水分子通过氢键来连接以提供高速的质子电子迁移通道。这些迁移通道对人工锰基析氧催化剂的开发和研究具有重要的启发意义，但却较少受到关注。本文通过简单的共沉淀法制备了一种夹有乙二胺离子和水分子的磷酸锰纳米片，磷酸锰与层间分子通过氢键连接，形成了氢键网络，一定程度上模拟了自然界析氧中心的外围结构。与氢键网络被破坏的磷酸锰纳米片相比，这种含有丰富、广泛和连续氢键网络的磷酸锰纳米片在中性条件下具有较高的催化析氧性能。磷酸锰纳米片中的氢键网络具有与光系统II中氢键网络类似的功能，它加快了质子的转移速率，从而促进电催化水氧化。

关键词: 电催化, 析氧反应, 水氧化, 磷酸锰, 氢键

Abstract:

Asymmetric manganese cluster, the active center of photosystem II (PSII) in nature, is hydrogen-bonded to surrounding amino acid residues and water molecules. This phenomenon is of great inspiration significance for developing and studying artificial Mn-based oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts. Herein, we prepared manganese phosphate nanosheets through intercalation of ethylenediamine ions and water molecules ((EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi) using a simple co-precipitation method. (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi is also hydrogen-bonded to interlayer ethylenediamine ions and water molecules, forming a hydrogen-bonding network. The morphology of the (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi sample was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy. The thickness of (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi was characterized by atomic force microscopy. The composition and structure of (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. For control studies, manganese phosphate (EDAI)MnPi and (H₂O)MnPi samples were also synthesized. The structure and morphology of (EDAI)MnPi and (H₂O)MnPi samples were characterized by XRD and SEM. The difference between (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi, (EDAI)MnPi, and (H₂O)MnPi were further characterized by thermal gravimetric analysis and derivative thermogravimetric analysis. Electrocatalytic properties of the (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi, (EDAI)MnPi, and (H₂O)MnPi for OER were studied in 0.05 mol∙L⁻¹ pH = 7 phosphate buffered saline solution, through linear sweep voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) test. The electrochemical surface area (ECSA) analyses of (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi, (EDAI)MnPi, and (H₂O)MnPi samples were recorded by charging currents in the non-Faradaic potential region at different scan rates. Considering the different ECSAs of different materials, the water oxidation activities of three materials were normalized by ECSA. Compared with counterparts of (EDAI)MnPi (610 mV) and (H₂O)MnPi (580 mV), manganese phosphate nanosheets (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi exhibited a lower overpotential of 520 mV when driving a current density of 1 mA∙cm⁻² in neutral conditions. The CPE experiment revealed that (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi remained active for at least 10 h. Manganese phosphate nanosheets containing a rich, extensive, and continuous hydrogen bond network exhibited improved OER performance in neutral conditions. The hydrogen-bonding network in manganese phosphate nanosheets has similar functions to the hydrogen-bonding network in PSII, which could accelerate the transfer rate of protons and facilitate electrocatalytic water oxidation. This study may provide guidance for the design of water oxidation catalysts with rich hydrogen bond network.

Key words: Electrocatalysis, Oxygen evolution reaction, Water oxidation, Manganese phosphate, Hydrogen bond

MSC2000:

O643

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

高学庆, 杨树姣, 张伟, 曹睿. 胺和水插层磷酸锰仿生模拟氢键网络用于电催化水氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2007031.

Xueqing Gao, Shujiao Yang, Wei Zhang, Rui Cao. Biomimicking Hydrogen-Bonding Network by Ammoniated and Hydrated Manganese (Ⅱ) Phosphate for Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(7): 2007031.

图/表 6

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

参考文献 46

1	Dogutan D. K. ; Nocera D. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 3143. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00380
2	Gao X. ; Chen Y. ; Sun T. ; Huang J. ; Zhang W. ; Wang Q. ; Cao R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 174. doi: 10.1039/c9ee02380a
3	Li P. ; Zhao R. ; Chen H. ; Wang H. ; Wei P. ; Huang H. ; Liu Q. ; Li T. ; Shi X. ; Zhang Y. ; et al Small 2019, 15, 1805103. doi: 10.1002/smll.201805103
4	Odella E. ; Mora S. J. ; Wadsworth B. L. ; Goings J. J. ; Gervaldo M. A. ; Sereno L. E. ; Groy T. L. ; Gust D. ; Moore T. A. ; Moore G. F. ; et al Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 3820. doi: 10.1039/c9sc06010c
5	Devi T. ; Lee Y. -M. ; Nam W. ; Fukuzumi S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 410, 213219. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213219
6	Siegbahn P. E. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1871. doi: 10.1021/ar900117k
7	Harriman A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 573 doi: 10.1002/ejic.201301540
8	Zhao D. ; Zhuang Z. ; Cao X. ; Zhang C. ; Peng Q. ; Chen C. ; Li Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 2215. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00869a
9	Ye S. ; Ding C. ; Liu M. ; Wang A. ; Huang Q. ; Li C. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1902069. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902069
10	Fukuzumi S. ; Lee Y.-M. ; Nam W. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 779. doi: 10.1039/c8dt04341h
11	Mavrokefalos C. K. ; Patzke G. R. Inorganics 2019, 7, 29. doi: 10.3390/inorganics7030029
12	Sun W. ; Lin J. ; Liang X. ; Yang J. ; Ma B. ; Ding Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905025.
	孙万军; 林军奇; 梁向明; 杨峻懿; 马宝春; 丁勇. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905025. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905025
13	Shaffer D. W. ; Xie Y. ; Concepcion J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6170. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00542c
14	Shen J. R. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 2015, 66, 23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120129
15	Yano J. ; Yachandra V. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4175. doi: 10.1021/cr4004874
16	Lubitz W. ; Chrysina M. ; Cox N. Photosynth. Res. 2019, 142, 105. doi: 10.1007/s11120-019-00648-3
17	Wang Y. ; Suzuki H. ; Xie J. ; Tomita O. ; Martin D. J. ; Higashi M. ; Kong D. ; Abe R. ; Tang J. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5201. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00286
18	Li Z. ; Wang W. ; Ding C. ; Wang Z. ; Liao S. ; Li C. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 765. doi: 10.1039/c6ee03401b
19	Zaharieva I. ; Najafpour M. M. ; Wiechen M. ; Haumann M. ; Kurz P. ; Dau H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2400. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00815j
20	Najafpour M. M. ; Zarei Ghobadi M. ; Sarvi B. ; Madadkhani S. ; Jafarian Sedigh D. ; Rafighi P. ; Tavahodi M. ; Shen J. -R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 5504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.131
21	McCool N. S. ; Robinson D. M. ; Sheats J. E. ; Dismukes G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11446. doi: 10.1021/ja203877y
22	Ye S. ; Ding C. ; Chen R. ; Fan F. ; Fu P. ; Yin H. ; Wang X. ; Wang Z. ; Du P. ; Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3250. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10662
23	Zhang T. ; Wang C. ; Liu S. ; Wang J. L. ; Lin W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 273. doi: 10.1021/ja409267p
24	Hou H. J. M. Materials 2011, 4, 1693. doi: 10.3390/ma4101693
25	Yamaguchi A. ; Inuzuka R. ; Takashima T. ; Hayashi T. ; Hashimoto K. ; Nakamura R. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4256. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5256
26	Kurz P. Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 371, 49. doi: 10.1007/128_2015_634
27	Najafpour M. M. ; Ghobadi M. Z. ; Haghighi B. ; Eaton-Rye J. J. ; Tomo T. ; Shen J. R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Biochemistry-Moscow 2014, 79, 324. doi: 10.1134/s0006297914040026
28	Jin K. ; Park J. ; Lee J. ; Yang K. D. ; Pradhan G. K. ; Sim U. ; Jeong D. ; Jang H. L. ; Park S. ; Kim D. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7435. doi: 10.1021/ja5026529
29	Najafpour M. M. ; Renger G. ; Holynska M. ; Moghaddam A. N. ; Aro E. -M. ; Carpentier R. ; Nishihara H. ; Eaton-Rye J. J. ; Shen J. -R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2886. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00340
30	Najafpour M. M. ; Zaharieva I. ; Zand Z. ; Hosseini S. M. ; Kouzmanova M. ; Holynska M. ; Tranca I. ; Larkum A. W. ; Shen J. -R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 409, 213183. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213183
31	Dau H. ; Zaharieva I. ; Haumann M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 3. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.02.011
32	Singh B. ; Indra A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2020, 506, 119440. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2020.119440
33	Xiao Y. ; Zhu Q. ; Yang Y. ; Wang W. ; Kuang T. ; Shen J. -R. ; Han G. Photosynth. Res. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11120-020-00753-8
34	Sugiura M. ; Taniguchi T. ; Tango N. ; Nakamura M. ; Selles J. ; Boussac A. Physiol. Plant. 2020. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13115
35	Lee Y. V. ; Tian B. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 2189. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00388
36	Petrie S. ; Terrett R. ; Stranger R. ; Pace R. J. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21, 785. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201901106
37	Mueh F. ; Zouni A. Protein Sci. 2020, 29, 1090. doi: 10.1002/pro.3841
38	Umena Y. ; Kawakami K. ; Shen J. R. ; Kamiya N. Nature 2011, 473, 55. doi: 10.1038/nature09913
39	Vogt L. ; Vinyard D. J. ; Khan S. ; Brudvig G. W. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015, 25, 152. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.12.040
40	Guerra F. ; Siemers M. ; Mielack C. ; Bondar A.-N. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 4625. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b00649
41	Isobe H. ; Shoji M. ; Shen J. -R. ; Yamaguchi K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 13922. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05740
42	Shoji M. ; Isobe H. ; Yamanaka S. ; Umena Y. ; Kawakami K. ; Kamiya N. ; Shen J. -R. ; Nakajima T. ; Yamaguchi K. Mol. Phys. 2015, 113, 359. doi: 10.1080/00268976.2014.960021
43	Li Y. ; Yao R. ; Chen Y. ; Xu B. ; Chen C. ; Zhang C. Catalysts 2020, 10, 185. doi: 10.3390/catal10020185
44	Dismukes G. C. ; Brimblecombe R. ; Felton G. A. N. ; Pryadun R. S. ; Sheats J. E. ; Spiccia L. ; Swiegers G. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1935. doi: 10.1021/ar900249x
45	Escobal J. ; Pizarro J. L. ; Mesa J. L. ; Lezama L. ; Olazcuaga R. ; Arriortua M. I. ; Rojo T. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 376. doi: 10.1021/cm9910815
46	Zhao H. R. ; Xue C. ; Li C. P. ; Zhang K. M. ; Luo H. B. ; Liu S. X. ; Ren X. M. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 8971. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01438

[1]	徐冰妍, 张应, 皮业灿, 邵琪, 黄小青. 镍基金属有机框架及其衍生物在电催化析氧反应中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2009074 -0 .
[2]	秦睿, 王鹏彦, 林灿, 曹菲, 张金咏, 陈磊, 木士春. 过渡金属氮化物的活性起源、合成方法及电催化应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2009099 -0 .
[3]	赵康宁, 李潇, 苏东. 高熵纳米合金在电化学催化中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2009077 -0 .
[4]	郝磊端, 孙振宇. 基于金属氧化物材料的二氧化碳电催化还原[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2009033 -0 .
[5]	肖瑶, 裴煜, 胡一帆, 马汝广, 王德义, 王家成. 磷化钴封装在磷富集的三维多孔碳及其双功能氧电催化性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2009051 -0 .
[6]	闫大强, 张林, 陈祖鹏, 肖卫平, 杨小飞. 镍基金属有机框架衍生的双功能电催化剂用于析氢和析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2009054 -0 .
[7]	高增强, 王聪勇, 李俊俊, 朱亚廷, 张志成, 胡文平. 导电金属有机框架材料在电催化中的成就，挑战和机遇[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2010025 -0 .
[8]	崔新江, 石峰. 基于单原子催化剂的二氧化碳选择性转化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(5): 2006080 -0 .
[9]	高敦峰, 魏鹏飞, 李合肥, 林龙, 汪国雄, 包信和. 用于二氧化碳电催化还原的电解器研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(5): 2009021 -0 .
[10]	谢安, 潘中华, 骆耿耿. 一类受生物启发的双膦双硒镍配合物的合成及其电催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 1910058 -0 .
[11]	周远, 韩娜, 李彦光. 钯基纳米材料电化学还原二氧化碳研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(9): 2001041 -0 .
[12]	杨天怡, 崔铖, 戎宏盼, 张加涛, 王定胜. 铂基金属间化合物纳米晶的最新进展：可控合成与电催化应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(9): 2003047 -0 .
[13]	涂昆芳, 李广, 姜艳霞. 温度对乙醇电催化氧化的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(8): 1906026 -0 .
[14]	唐小龙,张盛辉,于婧,吕春晓,迟雨晴,孙君伟,宋誉,袁丁,马兆立,张立学. 多孔氮化钛载体上铂催化剂的原子层沉积制备及其催化氧气还原性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(7): 1906070 -0 .
[15]	方波,冯立纲. 纳米颗粒结合ZIF-67衍生的PtCo-NC催化剂用于醇类燃料电氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(7): 1905023 -0 .