高活性氮化碳纳米片的制备策略

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008010

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (8): 2008010.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008010

所属专题：二维光催化材料

高活性氮化碳纳米片的制备策略

李开宁¹, 张梦曦¹, 欧小雨¹, 李睿娜¹, 李覃¹, 范佳杰², 吕康乐¹^,*()

¹ 中南民族大学资源与环境学院，催化转化与能源材料化学教育部重点实验室，武汉 430074
² 郑州大学材料科学与工程学院，郑州 450001

收稿日期:2020-08-04 录用日期:2020-08-31 发布日期:2020-09-07
通讯作者: 吕康乐 E-mail:lvkangle@mail.scuec.edu.cn
作者简介:吕康乐，男，1972年生。博士毕业于浙江大学化学系，现为中南民族大学资源与环境学院教授。主要从事光催化、污染控制化学与纳米环境催化材料方面的研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51672312)

Strategies for the Fabrication of 2D Carbon Nitride Nanosheets

Kaining Li¹, Mengxi Zhang¹, Xiaoyu Ou¹, Ruina Li¹, Qin Li¹, Jiajie Fan², Kangle Lv¹^,*()

¹ Key Laboratory of Catalysis and Energy Materials Chemistry of Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environmental Science, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, China
² School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received:2020-08-04 Accepted:2020-08-31 Published:2020-09-07
Contact: Kangle Lv E-mail:lvkangle@mail.scuec.edu.cn
About author:Kangle Lv, Email: lvkangle@mail.scuec.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-27-67841369
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(51672312)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

二维聚合物材料氮化碳纳米片因具有独特的电学特性、化学稳定性，在环境治理、能源转换领域有广阔的应用前景。开发绿色友好、经济高效的g-C₃N₄纳米片剥离策略和合成方法，是催化、能源、材料领域的热点问题。本文重点介绍了关于二维g-C₃N₄纳米片的剥离方法与制备策略的研究进展，同时对现有方法进行对比和分析，主要包括热氧化刻蚀、超声辅助剥离、化学法、机械法以及模板法等。文章的最后对g-C₃N₄纳米片的剥离制备所面临的问题和挑战，进行了讨论，并展望其未来发展方向。

关键词: 氮化碳, 纳米片, 剥离, 光催化, 半导体

Abstract:

Layered graphitic carbon nitride (g-C₃N₄) is a typical polymeric semiconductor with an sp² π-conjugated system having great potential in energy conversion, environmental purification, materials science, etc., owing to its unique physicochemical and electrical properties. However, bulk g-C₃N₄ obtained by calcination suffers from a low specific surface area, rapid charge carrier recombination, and poor dispersion in aqueous solutions, which limit its practical applications. Controlling the size of g-C₃N₄ (e.g., preparing g-C₃N₄ nanosheets) can effectively solve the above problems. Compared with the bulk material, g-C₃N₄ nanosheets have a larger specific surface area, richer active sites, and a larger band gap due to the quantum confinement effect. As g-C₃N₄ has a layered structure with strong in-plane C-N covalent bonds and weak van der Waals forces between the layers, g-C₃N₄ nanosheets can be prepared by exfoliating bulk g-C₃N₄. Alternatively, g-C₃N₄ nanosheets can otherwise be obtained through the anisotropic assembly of organic precursors. Nevertheless, some of these methods have various limitations, such as high energy consumption, are time consuming, and have low yield. Accordingly, developing green and cost-effective exfoliation and preparation strategies for g-C₃N₄ nanosheets is necessary. Herein, the research progress of the exfoliation and preparation strategies (including the thermal oxidation etching process, the ultrasound-assisted route, the chemical exfoliation, the mechanical method, and the template method) for two-dimensional C₃N₄ nanosheets are introduced. Their features are systematically analyzed and the perspectives and challenges in the preparation of g-C₃N₄ nanosheets are discussed. This study emphasizes the following: (1) The preparation method of g-C₃N₄ nanosheets should be properly selected according to the practical application needs. Additionally, various strategies (such as chemical method and ultrasonic method) can be combined to exfoliate nanosheets from bulk g-C₃N₄; (2) More reasonable nano- or even subnanostructured g-C₃N₄ nanosheets should be continuously explored; (3) Novel modification strategies, such as defective engineering, heterojunction construction, and surface functional group regulation, should be introduced to improve the reactivity and selectivity of the g-C₃N₄ nanosheets; (4) The application of in situ characterization techniques (such as in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy) should also be strengthened to monitor the detailed catalytic process and investigate the g-C₃N₄ nanosheet structure-efficiency relationship. (5) To gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between the macroscopic properties and the microscopic structure, the combination of theoretical calculations and experimental results should be strengthened, which will be beneficial for exploiting high-quality g-C₃N₄ nanosheets.

Key words: Carbon nitride, Nanosheets, Exfoliation, Photocatalysis, Semiconductor

MSC2000:

O649

李开宁, 张梦曦, 欧小雨, 李睿娜, 李覃, 范佳杰, 吕康乐. 高活性氮化碳纳米片的制备策略[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2008010.

Kaining Li, Mengxi Zhang, Xiaoyu Ou, Ruina Li, Qin Li, Jiajie Fan, Kangle Lv. Strategies for the Fabrication of 2D Carbon Nitride Nanosheets[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(8): 2008010.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表2

参考文献 66

1	Novoselov K. S. ; Geim A. K. ; Morozov S. V. ; Jiang D. ; Zhang Y. ; Dubonos S. V. ; Grigorieva I. V. ; Firsov A. A. Science 2004, 306, 666. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896
2	Li Q. ; Li X. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Yu J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500010. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201500010
3	Wang J. ; Jin X. ; Li C. ; Wang W. ; Wu H. ; Guo S. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 370, 831. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.229
4	Zhao H. ; Ding R. ; Zhao X. ; Li Y. ; Qu L. ; Pei H. ; Yildirimer L. ; Wu Z. ; Zhang W. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 1302. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.04.002
5	Anasori B. ; Lukatskaya M. R. ; Gogotsi Y. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16098. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.98
6	Li K. ; Zhang S. ; Li Y. ; Fan J. ; Lv K. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 3. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(20)63630-0
7	Lv K. ; Li K. ; Li Z. ; Huang W. ; Li Q. ; Shen Q. J. Xuzhou Instit. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 34, 18.
	吕康乐; 李开宁; 李志鹏; 黄蔚欣; 李覃; 沈群. 徐州工程学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 34, 18. doi: 10.15873/j.cnki.jxit.000314
8	Hu W. ; Han G. ; Liu Y. ; Dong B. ; Chai Y. ; Liu Y. ; Liu C. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 6552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.150
9	Ning M. Q. ; Lu M. M. ; Li J. B. ; Chen Z. ; Dou Y. K. ; Wang C. Z. ; Rehman F. ; Cao M. S. ; Jin H. B. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 15734. doi: 10.1039/c5nr04670j
10	Krishnamoorthy K. ; Pazhamalai P. ; Kim S. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1595. doi: 10.1039/c8ee00160j
11	Pazhamalai P. ; Krishnamoorthy K. ; Sahoo S. ; Mariappan V. K. ; Kim S. J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 624. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b15323
12	Ong W. J. ; Tan L. L. ; Ng Y. H. ; Yong S. T. ; Chai S. P. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7159. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075
13	Zhang J. ; Chen Y. ; Wang X. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3092. doi: 10.1039/c5ee01895a
14	Low J. ; Cao S. ; Yu J. ; Wageh S. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10768. doi: 10.1039/c4cc02553a
15	Dong X. ; Cheng F. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 23642. doi: 10.1039/c5ta07374j
16	Panneri S. ; Ganguly P. ; Nair B. N. ; Mohamed A. A. ; Warrier K. G. ; Hareesh U. N. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 8609. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8538-z
17	Han Q. ; Wang B. ; Zhao Y. ; Hu C. ; Qu L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11433. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504985
18	Yu Y. ; Yan W. ; Wang X. ; Li P. ; Gao W. ; Zou H. ; Wu S. ; Ding K. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705060. doi: 10.1002/adma.201705060
19	Yang C. ; Zhang S. ; Huang Y. ; Lv K. ; Fang S. ; Wu X. ; Li Q. ; Fan J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 505, 144654. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144654
20	Cheng J. ; Hu Z. ; Lv K. ; Wu X. ; Li Q. ; Li Y. ; Li X. ; Sun J. Appl. Catal. B 2018, 232, 330. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.066
21	Liu M. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Xia P. ; Cheng B. ; Zhang L. ; Yu J. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 14023. doi: 10.1039/c9cc07647f
22	Sun Z. ; Wang H. ; Wu Z. ; Wang L. Catal. Today 2018, 300, 160. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.033
23	Li C. ; Yu S. ; Zhang X. ; Wang Y. ; Liu C. ; Chen G. ; Dong H. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 538, 462. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.009
24	Zheng Q. ; Durkin D. P. ; Elenewski J. E. ; Sun Y. ; Banek N. A. ; Hua L. ; Chen H. ; Wagner M. J. ; Zhang W. ; Shuai D. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 12938. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02579
25	Fang S. ; Xia Y. ; Lv K. ; Li Q. ; Sun J. ; Li M. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 185, 225. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.025
26	Liao J. ; Cui W. ; Li J. ; Sheng J. ; Wang H. ; Dong X. A. ; Chen P. ; Jiang G. ; Wang Z. ; Dong F. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122282. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122282
27	Liu S. H. ; Lin W. X. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 368, 468. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.082
28	Duan Y. ; Li X. ; Lv K. ; Zhao L. ; Liu Y. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 492, 166. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.125
29	Li Y. ; Gu M. ; Shi T. ; Cui W. ; Zhang X. ; Dong F. ; Cheng J. ; Fan J. ; Lv K. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 262, 118281. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118281
30	Han X. ; Zhang W. ; Ma X. ; Zhong C. ; Zhao N. ; Hu W. ; Deng Y. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1808281. doi: 10.1002/adma.201808281
31	Zhuang Z. ; Li Y. ; Li Z. ; Lv F. ; Lang Z. ; Zhao K. ; Zhou L. ; Moskaleva L. ; Guo S. ; Mai L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 496. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708748
32	Wang S. ; He P. ; Jia L. ; He M. ; Zhang T. ; Dong F. ; Liu M. ; Liu H. ; Zhang Y. ; Li C. ; et al Appl. Catal. B 2019, 243, 463. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.071
33	Zheng Y. ; Jiao Y. ; Zhu Y. ; Cai Q. ; Vasileff A. ; Li L. H. ; Han Y. ; Chen Y. ; Qiao S. Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3336. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b13100
34	Sarkar S. ; Sumukh S. S. ; Roy K. ; Kamboj N. ; Purkait T. ; Das M. ; Dey R. S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 558, 182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.09.107
35	Pieta I. S. ; Rathi A. ; Pieta P. ; Nowakowski R. ; Hołdynski M. ; Pisarek M. ; Kaminska A. ; Gawande M. B. ; Zboril R. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 244, 272. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.072
36	Cheng J. ; Hu Z. ; Li Q. ; Li X. ; Fang S. ; Wu X. ; Li M. ; Ding Y. ; Liu B. ; Yang C. ; et al Appl. Catal. B 2019, 245, 197. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.044
37	Qin Z. ; Wu J. ; Li B. ; Su T. ; Ji H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2005027.
	秦祖赠; 吴靖; 李斌; 苏通明; 纪红兵. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2005027. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202005027
38	Hong Y. ; Li C. ; Li D. ; Fang Z. ; Luo B. ; Yan X. ; Shen H. ; Mao B. ; Shi W. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 14103. doi: 10.1039/c7nr05155g
39	Dong F. ; Li Y. ; Wang Z. ; Ho W. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 393. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.034
40	Niu P. ; Zhang L. ; Liu G. ; Cheng H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4763. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200922
41	Zhang X. ; Xie X. ; Wang H. ; Zhang J. ; Pan B. ; Xie Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18. doi: 10.1021/ja308249k
42	Zhang J. ; Li J. ; Wang W. ; Zhang X. ; Tan X. ; Chu W. ; Guo Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702839. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702839
43	Xu J. ; Zhang L. ; Shi R. ; Zhu Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 14766. doi: 10.1039/c3ta13188b
44	Lin L. S. ; Cong Z. X. ; Li J. ; Ke K. M. ; Guo S. S. ; Yang H. H. ; Chen G. N. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 1031. doi: 10.1039/c3tb21479f
45	Du X. ; Zou G. ; Wang Z. ; Wang X. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 8701. doi: 10.1039/c5nr00665a
46	Kwon N. H. ; Shin S. ; Jin X. ; Jung Y. ; Hwang G. ; Kim H. ; Hwang S. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 277, 119191. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119191
47	Han Q. ; Zhao F. ; Hu C. ; Lv L. ; Zhang Z. ; Chen N. ; Qu L. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 1718. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0675-9
48	Ji J. ; Wen J. ; Shen Y. ; Lv Y. ; Chen Y. ; Liu S. ; Ma H. ; Zhang Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 11698. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06708
49	Wu M. ; Yan J. M. ; Tang X. N. ; Zhao M. ; Jiang Q. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 2654. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201402180
50	Lu X. ; Xu K. ; Chen P. ; Jia K. ; Liu S. ; Wu C. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18924. doi: 10.1039/c4ta04487h
51	Xing W. ; Tu W. ; Han Z. ; Hu Y. ; Meng Q. ; Chen G. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 514. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01328
52	Zhang J. ; Zhang M. ; Yang C. ; Wang X. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4121. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400573
53	Li Y. ; Jin R. ; Xing Y. ; Li J. ; Song S. ; Liu X. ; Li M. ; Jin R. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1601273. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601273
54	Yang S. ; Gong Y. ; Zhang J. ; Zhan L. ; Ma L. ; Fang Z. ; Vajtai R. ; Wang X. ; Ajayan P. M. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2452. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204453
55	Ou H. ; Lin L. ; Zheng Y. ; Yang P. ; Fang Y. ; Wang X. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700008. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700008
56	Hernandez Y. ; Nicolosi V. ; Lotya M. ; Blighe F. M. ; Sun Z. ; De S. ; McGovern I. T. ; Holland B. ; Byrne M. ; Gun'Ko Y.K. ; et al Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 563. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.215
57	Lin Q. ; Li L. ; Liang S. ; Liu M. ; Bi J. ; Wu L. Appl. Catal. B 2015, 163, 135. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.053
58	Xue Z. ; Liu F. ; Jiang J. ; Wang J. ; Mu T. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5041. doi: 10.1039/c7gc02583a
59	Cheng F. ; Wang H. ; Dong X. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7176. doi: 10.1039/c5cc01035g
60	Shi L. ; Chang K. ; Zhang H. ; Hai X. ; Yang L. ; Wang T. ; Ye J. Small 2016, 12, 4431. doi: 10.1002/smll.201601668
61	Song T. ; Zhang P. ; Wang T. ; Ali A. ; Zeng H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 464, 195. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.062
62	Xu J. ; Wang H. ; Zhang C. ; Yang X. ; Cao S. ; Yu J. ; Shalom M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 8426. doi: 10.1002/anie.201611946
63	Han Q. ; Wang B. ; Gao J. ; Cheng Z. ; Zhao Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Qu L. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 2745. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07831
64	Hong Y. ; Li C. ; Fang Z. ; Luo B. ; Shi W. Carbon 2017, 121, 463. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.020
65	Wu X. ; Wang X. ; Wang F. ; Yu H. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 247, 70. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.088
66	Wu X. ; Gao D. ; Yu H. ; Yu J. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 9608. doi: 10.1039/c9nr00887j

Exfoliated strategies and preparation methods	Advantages	Disadvantages	Scope of application	Ref.
Thermal oxidation etching	Easy to operate	High energy consumption; low yield	Photocatalysis electrocatalysis	30, 40
Ultrasound-assisted method	The obtained nanosheets can inherit the structural characteristics of the bulk C₃N₄ and have fewer defects.	Time consumption	Photocatalysis; electrocatalysis energy storage; bioimaging	41, 42
Chemical exfoliation	The preparation time is relatively short; the obtained samples can be highly dispersed; easy to control the surface charge properties by adjusting the pH value.	Inevitably introduce organic solvents or strong acids; require additional work for removal	Photocatalysis; photosynthesis; Electrocatalysis biomedicine	43-46
Mechanical method	High exfoliated efficiency; simultaneous exfoliation and modification can be achieved	Only obtain small size nanosheets	Photocatalysis; biosensing	47, 48
Template method	Controllable morphology; relatively high yield	Additional additives may affect g-C₃N₄ polymerization; contain unavoidable template removal process	Photocatalysis; energy storage	49-52

Sample	Precursor of bulk g-C₃N₄	Exfoliation method	Thickness (nm)	Surface area (m²·g^-1)	Yield (compared to bulk g-C₃N₄)	Ref.
g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Dicyandiamide	Thermal oxidation etching	≈ 2	306	6%	40
Porous g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Thiourea	Thermal exfoliation	16	151	8%	39
Foam-Like holey ultrathin g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Melamine	Long-time thermal oxidation etching	9.2	277.98	-	53
Ultrathin g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Melamine	Sonication(in aqueous solution for 16 h)	≈ 2.5	-	-	41
g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Commercial bulk g-C₃N₄	Sonication (in isopropanol for 10 h)	≈ 2	384	-	54
Monolayer g-C₃N₄ nanosheet	Melamine	Sonication (in mixed solvent for 10 h)	0.38	59.4	-	57
Tri-s-triazine-based crystalline C₃N₄ nanosheets	Melamine	Sonication (in isopropanol for 15 h)	≈ 3.6	203	-	55
Few-layer g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Melamine	Sonication (in γ-valerolactone for 24 h)	≈ 2	-	-	58
Single atomic layer g-C₃N₄ nanosheet	Dicyandiamide	Chemical exfoliation method(H₂SO₄)	≈ 0.4	205.8	-	43
Amphoteric g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Melamine	Chemical exfoliation method(H₂SO₄)	≈ 9	-	-	59
g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Melamine	Chemical exfoliation method(HNO₃)	≈ 1.1	-	-	44
Protonated porous g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Dicyandiamide	Chemical exfoliation method(H₃PO₄)	≈ 1	55.4	-	60
Ultrathing-C₃N₄ nanoplatelets	Melamine	Ball milling	0.35-0.7	97	15%	47
g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Dicyandiamide	Ball milling	1.5-20	63.62	-	48
g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Dicyandiamide	Soft-template	3.1	52.9	-	50
High-crystalline g-C₃N₄ nanosheets	Dicyandiamide	Template method	-	39.24	-	51

[1]	刘弘禹, 孟钢, 邓赞红, 李蒙, 常鋆青, 代甜甜, 方晓东. VOCs分子的半导体型传感器识别检测研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2008018 -0 .
[2]	孙志聪, 罗二桂, 孟庆磊, 王显, 葛君杰, 刘长鹏, 邢巍. 采用薄层氮化碳促进的高性能钯基催化剂用于甲酸分解制氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 2003035 -0 .
[3]	王键, 尹波, 高天, 王星懿, 李望, 洪兴星, 汪竹青, 何海勇. 还原氧化石墨烯改性少层剥离石墨增强石墨基钾离子电池负极稳定性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2012088 -0 .
[4]	黄小雄, 马英杰, 智林杰. 超薄氮掺杂碳纳米片负载单原子镍用于高效电催化还原二氧化碳[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2011050 -0 .
[5]	李瀚, 李芳, 余家国, 曹少文. 二维/二维FeNi-LDH/g-C₃N₄复合光催化剂用于促进CO₂光还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2010073 -0 .
[6]	王薇, 黄宇, 王震宇. 缺陷工程调控石墨相氮化碳及其光催化空气净化应用进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2011073 -0 .
[7]	周易, 欧阳威龙, 王岳军, 王海强, 吴忠标. 核壳结构NH₂-UiO-66@TiO₂的制备及其可见光下的甲苯降解性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009045 -0 .
[8]	陈鹏, 周莹, 董帆. 二维光催化材料电子结构和性能调控策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2010010 -0 .
[9]	李钱, 胡静, 周易, 王海强, 吴忠标. La掺杂BiOI微球可见光下光催化氧化NO性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009100 -0 .
[10]	郑倩, 曹玥晗, 黄南建, 张瑞阳, 周莹. BN诱导BiOI富氧{110}面的暴露并增强其可见光催化氧化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009063 -0 .
[11]	张鹏, 王继全, 李源, 姜丽莎, 王壮壮, 张高科. 非贵金属助剂Ni₂P修饰类石墨碳氮化物光催化剂增强可见光光催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009102 -0 .
[12]	姜志民, 陈晴, 郑巧清, 沈荣晨, 张鹏, 李鑫. 1D Mn_0.2Cd_0.8S纳米棒/2D Ti₃C₂纳米片肖特基异质结的构建及光催化产氢性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2010059 -0 .
[13]	费新刚, 谭海燕, 程蓓, 朱必成, 张留洋. 理论计算研究二维/二维BP/g-C₃N₄异质结的光催化CO₂还原性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2010027 -0 .
[14]	梅子慧, 王国宏, 严素定, 王娟. 微波辅助快速制备2D/1D ZnIn₂S₄/TiO₂ S型异质结及其光催化制氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2009097 -0 .
[15]	王苹, 李海涛, 曹艳洁, 余火根. 羧基功能化石墨烯增强TiO₂光催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2008047 -0 .

高活性氮化碳纳米片的制备策略

Strategies for the Fabrication of 2D Carbon Nitride Nanosheets

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 66

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10