羧基功能化石墨烯增强TiO2光催化产氢性能

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008047

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (6): 2008047.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008047

所属专题：先进光催化剂设计与制备

羧基功能化石墨烯增强TiO₂光催化产氢性能

王苹¹^,*(), 李海涛¹, 曹艳洁¹, 余火根¹^,²^,*()

¹ 武汉理工大学化学化工与生命科学学院，武汉 430070
² 武汉理工大学硅酸盐建筑材料国家重点实验室，武汉 430070

收稿日期:2020-08-17 录用日期:2020-09-22 发布日期:2020-09-28
通讯作者: 王苹,余火根 E-mail:wangping0904@whut.edu.cn;yuhuogen@whut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21771142);国家自然科学基金(51872221);中央高校基本科研业务费(WUT2019IB002)

Carboxyl-Functionalized Graphene for Highly Efficient H₂-Evolution Activity of TiO₂ Photocatalyst

Ping Wang¹^,*(), Haitao Li¹, Yanjie Cao¹, Huogen Yu¹^,²^,*()

¹ School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Sciences, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
² State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2020-08-17 Accepted:2020-09-22 Published:2020-09-28
Contact: Ping Wang,Huogen Yu E-mail:wangping0904@whut.edu.cn;yuhuogen@whut.edu.cn
About author:Huogen Yu, Emails: yuhuogen@whut.edu.cn (H.Y.)
Ping Wang, Emails: wangping0904@whut.edu.cn (P.W.); Tel.: +86-27-87756779-8303 (P.W.)
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21771142);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51872221);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China(WUT2019IB002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用半导体光催化剂(CdS、g-C₃N₄、TiO₂等)产氢是将太阳能转换为氢能以满足未来能源需求的前瞻性策略之一。在众多光催化剂中，TiO₂因其合适的还原电位和出色的化学稳定性而备受关注。然而，TiO₂受光激发产生的电子和空穴容易发生猝灭而表现出有限的光催化性能。由于具备优异的导电性和稳定性，石墨烯可以作为一种有效的电子助剂加速光生电子的传输，进而提高TiO₂的产氢性能。但是，在光催化反应中，除了光生电子的快速转移外，石墨烯表面的界面产氢反应也非常重要。因此，有必要进一步优化石墨烯的微观结构(功能化石墨烯)，以提高石墨烯基TiO₂光催化剂的产氢性能。通常，石墨烯的功能化是一个可以在石墨烯表面上引入产氢活性位点的有效策略。与非共价功能化(例如在石墨烯表面上加载Pt，MoS_x和CoS_x)相比，石墨烯的共价功能化可以通过化学反应将产氢活性位点与石墨烯表面的官能团相结合，并形成强相互作用，有利于界面的产氢反应。本文将开环和酯化反应制备的羧基功能化石墨烯(rGO-COOH)成功地通过超声辅助自组装法修饰TiO₂得到高活性的TiO₂/rGO-COOH光催化剂。傅立叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱显著增强的―COOH官能团特征峰、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)中的峰面积变化和热重(TG)曲线的质量变化证实了GO向rGO-COOH的成功转变。X射线衍射(XRD)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)、XPS和紫外可见漫反射光谱(UV-Vis)等一系列表征可证明TiO₂/rGO-COOH光催化剂的成功合成。光催化产氢测试结果表明TiO₂/rGO-COOH样品表现出较高的产氢活性(254.2 μmol·h^-1·g^-1)，分别是TiO₂/GO和TiO₂的2.06和4.48倍。光催化活性提高可归因于羧基功能化石墨烯中具有优异亲核性的羧基可以富集氢离子，并作为有效的产氢活性位点，显著地提高TiO₂的界面产氢反应速率。这项研究为我们在光催化产氢领域中开发高活性石墨烯负载的光催化剂提供了新的思路。

关键词: 羧基功能化石墨烯, 羧基基团, TiO₂, 光催化产氢

Abstract:

The use of semiconductor photocatalysts (CdS, g-C₃N₄, TiO₂, etc.) to generate hydrogen (H₂) is a prospective strategy that can convert solar energy into hydrogen energy, thereby meeting future energy demands. Among the numerous photocatalysts, TiO₂ has attracted significant attention because of its suitable reduction potential and excellent chemical stability. However, the photoexcited electrons and holes of TiO₂ are easily quenched, leading to limited photocatalytic performance. Furthermore, graphene has been used as an effective electron cocatalyst in the accelerated transport of photoinduced electrons to enhance the H₂-production performance of TiO₂, owing to its excellent conductivity and high charge carrier mobility. For an efficient graphene-based photocatalyst, the rapid transfer of photogenerated electrons is extremely important along with an effectual interfacial H₂-production reaction on the graphene surface. Therefore, it is necessary to further optimize the graphene microstructures (functionalized graphene) to improve the H₂-production performance of graphene-based TiO₂ photocatalysts. The introduction of H₂-evolution active sites onto the graphene surface is an effective strategy for the functionalization of graphene. Compared with the noncovalent functionalization of graphene (such as loading Pt, MoS_x, and CoS_x on the graphene surface), its covalent functionalization can provide a strong interaction between graphene and organic molecules in the form of H₂-evolution active sites that are produced by chemical reactions. In this study, carboxyl-functionalized graphene (rGO-COOH) was successfully modified via ring-opening and esterification reactions on the TiO₂ surface by using an ultrasound-assisted self-assembly method to prepare a high-activity TiO₂/rGO-COOH photocatalyst. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and thermogravimetric (TG) curves revealed the successful covalent functionalization of GO to rGO-COOH by significantly enhanced ―COOH groups in FTIR and increased peak area of carboxyl groups in XPS. A series of characterizations, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), XPS, and UV-Vis adsorption spectra, were performed to demonstrate the successful synthesis of TiO₂/rGO-COOH photocatalysts. The experimental data for the hydrogen-evolution rate showed that the TiO₂/rGO-COOH displayed an extremely high hydrogen-generation activity (254.2 μmol∙h⁻¹∙g⁻¹), which was 2.06- and 4.48-fold higher than those of TiO₂/GO and TiO₂, respectively. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO₂/rGO-COOH is ascribed to the carboxyl groups of carboxyl-functionalized graphene, which act as effective hydrogen-generation active sites and enrich hydrogen ions owing to their excellent nucleophilicity that facilitates the interfacial hydrogen production reaction of TiO₂. This study provides novel insights into the development of high-activity graphene-supported photocatalysts in the hydrogen-generation field.

Key words: Carboxyl-functionalized graphene, Carboxyl groups, TiO₂, Photocatalytic H₂ evolution

MSC2000:

O643

王苹, 李海涛, 曹艳洁, 余火根. 羧基功能化石墨烯增强TiO₂光催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2008047.

Ping Wang, Haitao Li, Yanjie Cao, Huogen Yu. Carboxyl-Functionalized Graphene for Highly Efficient H₂-Evolution Activity of TiO₂ Photocatalyst[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(6): 2008047.

图/表 12

Fig 1

Fig 2

Table 1

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Table 2

Fig 6

Fig 7

Table 3

Fig 8

Fig 9

参考文献 57

1	Li J. ; Li Y. ; Zhang G. ; Huang H. ; Wu X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 7112. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b21693
2	Luo J. ; Lin Z. ; Zhao Y. ; Jiang S. ; Song S. Chin. J. Catal. 2020, 41, 122. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(19)63490-x
3	Mu R. ; Ao Y. ; Wu T. ; Wang C. ; Wang P. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 812, 151990. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151990
4	Wang J. ; Chen J. ; Wang P. ; Hou J. ; Wang C. ; Ao Y. Appl. Catal. B:Environ. 2018, 239, 578. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.048
5	Wang K. ; Li Y. ; Li J. ; Zhang G. Appl. Catal. B:Environ. 2020, 263, 117730. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.032
6	Zhao Y. ; Shao C. ; Lin Z. ; Jiang S. ; Song S. Small 2020, 16, 2000944. doi: 10.1002/smll.202000944
7	Lin J. ; Liu Y. ; Liu Y. ; Huang C. ; Liu W. ; Mi X. ; Fan D. ; Fan F. ; Lu H. ; Chen X. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 961. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201802691
8	Cao D. ; An H. ; Yan X. ; Zhao Y. ; Yang G. ; Mei H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1901051.
	曹丹; 安华; 严孝清; 赵宇鑫; 杨贵东; 梅辉; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1901051. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201901051
9	Cheng L. ; Zhang D. ; Liao Y. ; Li F. ; Zhang H. ; Xiang Q. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.07.060
10	Qiu X. ; Miyauchi M. ; Sunada K. ; Minoshima M. ; Liu M. ; Lu Y. ; Li D. ; Shimodaira Y. ; Hosogi Y. ; Kuroda Y. ; Hashimoto K. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1609. doi: 10.1021/nn2045888
11	Shen J. ; Wang R. ; Liu Q. ; Yang X. ; Tang H. ; Yang J. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 380. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(18)63166-3
12	Pan J. ; Shen S. ; Zhou W. ; Tang J. ; Ding H. ; Wang J. ; Chen L. ; Au C. -T. ; Yin S. -F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905068.
	潘金波; 申升; 周威; 唐杰; 丁洪志; 王进博; 陈浪; 区泽堂; 尹双凤; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905068. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905068
13	Duan S. ; Wu S. ; Wang L. ; She H. ; Huang J. ; Wang Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905086.
	段树华; 巫树锋; 王磊; 佘厚德; 黄静伟; 王其召; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905086. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905086
14	Yin S. Y. ; Chaktong A. ; Li H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1910023.
	尹双凤; 区泽堂; 李华明; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1910023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201910023
15	Wang H. ; Hu X. ; Ma Y. ; Zhu D. ; Li T. ; Wang J. Chin. J. Catal. 2020, 41, 95. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(19)63452-2
16	Xiang Q. ; Ma X. ; Zhang D. ; Zhou H. ; Liao Y. ; Zhang H. ; Xu S. ; Levchenko I. ; Bazaka K. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 556, 376. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.033
17	Xu Q. ; Zhang L. ; Cheng B. ; Fan J. ; Yu J. Chem 2020, 6, 1543. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.010
18	Sun S. ; Zhang X. ; Liu X. ; Pan L. ; Zhang X. ; Zou J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905007.
	孙尚聪; 张旭雅; 刘显龙; 潘伦; 张香文; 邹吉军; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905007. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905007
19	Li Y. ; Wang X. ; Gong J. ; Xie Y. ; Wu X. ; Zhang G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 43760. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b17580
20	Li X. ; Yu J. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Xie J. Small 2016, 12, 6640. doi: 10.1002/smll.201600382
21	Oh I. ; Youn J. -S. ; Kang H. ; Manavalan K. ; Jung S. -C. ; Park Y. -K. ; Jeon K. -J. Carbon 2020, 161, 665. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.005
22	Shen R. ; Xie J. ; Xiang Q. ; Chen X. ; Jiang J. ; Li X. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 240. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(19)63294-8
23	Chen F. ; Luo W. ; Mo Y. ; Yu H. ; Cheng B. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 430, 448. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.165
24	Jiang L. ; Wang K. ; Wu X. ; Zhang G. ; Yin S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 26898. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b07311
25	Xiang Q. ; Yu J. ; Jaroniec M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6575. doi: 10.1021/ja302846n
26	Lv X. ; Zhou S. ; Zhang C. ; Chang H. ; Chen Y. ; Fu W. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 18542. doi: 10.1039/c2jm33325b
27	Dreyer D. R. ; Park S. ; Bielawski C. W. ; Ruoff R. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228. doi: 10.1039/b917103g
28	Xu Y. ; Li Y. ; Wang P. ; Wang X. ; Yu H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 430, 176. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.188
29	Gong X. ; Liu G. ; Li Y. ; Yu D. Y. W. ; Teoh W. Y. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 8082. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01447
30	Chen J. ; Zhang X. ; Cai H. ; Chen Z. ; Wang T. ; Jia L. ; Wang J. ; Wan Q. ; Pei X. Colloids Surf. B 2016, 147, 397. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.08.023
31	Saleem S. J. ; Guler M. Electronal 2019, 31, 2187. doi: 10.1002/elan.201900287
32	Park K. -W. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4292. doi: 10.1039/c3ta14223j
33	Bharti A. ; Agnihotri N. ; Prabhakar N. Mikrochim. Acta 2019, 186, 185. doi: 10.1007/s00604-019-3302-3
34	Shiddiky M. J. A. ; Rauf S. ; Kithva P. H. ; Trau M. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 35, 251. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.02.057
35	Wang H. ; Hao Q. ; Yang X. ; Lu L. ; Wang X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 821. doi: 10.1021/am900815k
36	Deb Nath N. C. ; Jeon I. -Y. ; Ju M. J. ; Ansari S. A. ; Baek J. -B. ; Lee J. J. Carbon 2019, 142, 89. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.011
37	Nurunnabi M. ; Khatun Z. ; Huh K. M. ; Park S. Y. ; Lee D. Y. ; Cho K. J. ; Lee Y. K. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 6858. doi: 10.1021/nn402043c
38	Fan X. ; Shang K. ; Sun B. ; Chen L. ; Ai S. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 2672. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7975-4
39	Bharath G. ; Veeramani V. ; Chen S. -M. ; Madhu R. ; Manivel Raja M. ; Balamurugan A. ; Mangalaraj D. ; Viswanathan C. ; Ponpandian N. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 13392. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7975-4
40	Ziółkowski R. ; Górski Ł. ; Malinowska E. Sensor. Actuat. B-Chem. 2017, 238, 540. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.119
41	Yu S. ; Liu J. ; Zhu W. ; Hu Z. T. ; Lim T. T. ; Yan X. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16369. doi: 10.1038/srep16369
42	Li H. ; Wang P. ; Yi X. ; Yu H. Appl. Catal. B:Environ. 2020, 264, 118504. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118504
43	Yu H. ; Liu W. ; Wang X. ; Wang F. Appl. Catal. B:Environ. 2018, 225, 415. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.026
44	Yu H. ; Yuan R. ; Gao D. ; Xu Y. ; Yu J. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 121934. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.121934
45	Gao D. ; Wu X. ; Wang P. ; Xu Y. ; Yu H. ; Yu J. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 10084. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01516
46	Lerf A. ; He H. ; Forster M. ; Klinowski J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 4477. doi: 10.1021/jp9731821
47	Liu Y. ; Deng R. ; Wang Z. ; Liu H. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 13619. doi: 10.1039/c2jm32479b
48	Luo Q. ; Ge R. ; Kang S. -Z. ; Qin L. ; Li G. ; Li X. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 15. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.152
49	Cho K. M. ; Kim K. H. ; Park K. ; Kim C. ; Kim S. ; Al-Saggaf A. ; Gereige I. ; Jung H. -T. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 7064. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01908
50	McAllister M. J. ; Li J. -L. ; Adamson D. H. ; Schniepp H. C. ; Abdala A. A. ; Liu J. ; Herrera-Alonso M. ; Milius D. L. ; Car R. ; Prud'homme R. K. ; et al Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 4396. doi: 10.1021/cm0630800
51	Shin Y. ; Vranic S. ; Just-Baringo X. ; Gali S. M. ; Kisby T. ; Chen Y. ; Gkoutzidou A. ; Prestat E. ; Beljonne D. ; Larrosa I. ; et al Nanoscale 2020, 12, 12383. doi: 10.1039/d0nr02689a
52	Chu C. ; Huang D. ; Zhu Q. ; Stavitski E. ; Spies J. A. ; Pan Z. ; Mao J. ; Xin H. L. ; Schmuttenmaer C. A. ; Hu S. ; Kim J. -H. ACS Catal. 2018, 9, 626. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03738
53	Wang P. ; Xu S. ; Chen F. ; Yu H. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 343. doi: 10.1016/s1872-2067(18)63157-2
54	Liu J. ; Wang P. ; Fan J. ; Yu H. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 51, 253. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.085
55	Wu X. ; Chen F. ; Wang X. ; Yu H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 645. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.050
56	Bai J. Y. ; Wang L. J. ; Zhang Y. J. ; Wen C. F. ; Wang X. L. ; Yang H. G. Appl. Catal. B:Environ. 2020, 266, 118590. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118590
57	Gao D. ; Liu W. ; Xu Y. ; Wang P. ; Fan J. ; Yu H. Appl. Catal. B:Environ. 2020, 260, 118190. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118190

Samples	C(O)-O/N-C=N	C=O/C=O(N)	C-O	C-C
GO	4.98%	8.31%	42.72%	43.99%
rGO-COOH	11.96%	9.46%	36.59%	41.99%
TiO₂/GO	6.51%	4.28%	18.59%	70.63%
TiO₂/rGO-COOH (1%)	8.25%	4.82%	14.45%	72.48%

Samples	C	N	O	Ti
TiO₂	64.79%	0.27%	27.92%	7.02%
TiO₂/GO	45.96%	0.18%	37.89%	15.97%
TiO₂/rGO-COOH (1%)	36.22%	0.38%	43.12%	20.28%

Samples	H₂ evolution activity (μmol?h^-1?g^-1)	AQE (%)
TiO₂	56.7	0.55
TiO₂/GO	123.6	1.20
TiO₂/rGO-COOH(0.5%)	199.2	1.93
TiO₂/rGO-COOH(1%)	254.2	2.47
TiO₂/rGO-COOH(2%)	96.8	0.94

[1]	刘珊池, 王凯, 杨梦雪, 靳治良. Mn_0.2Cd_0.8S@CoAl LDH S-型异质结构建及其光催化析氢性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(7): 2109023 - .
[2]	沈荣晨, 郝磊, 陈晴, 郑巧清, 张鹏, 李鑫. 高分散Co_0.2Ni_1.6Fe_0.2P助催化剂改性P掺杂g-C₃N₄纳米片高效光催化析氢的研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(7): 2110014 - .
[3]	杨越, 朱加伟, 王鹏彦, 刘海咪, 曾炜豪, 陈磊, 陈志祥, 木士春. 镶嵌于NH₂-MIL-125 (Ti)衍生氮掺多孔碳中的花状超细纳米TiO₂作为高活性和稳定性的锂离子电池负极材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2106002 - .
[4]	张鹏, 王继全, 李源, 姜丽莎, 王壮壮, 张高科. 非贵金属助剂Ni₂P修饰类石墨碳氮化物光催化剂增强可见光光催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009102 - .
[5]	周易, 欧阳威龙, 王岳军, 王海强, 吴忠标. 核壳结构NH₂-UiO-66@TiO₂的制备及其可见光下的甲苯降解性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009045 - .
[6]	姜志民, 陈晴, 郑巧清, 沈荣晨, 张鹏, 李鑫. 1D Mn_0.2Cd_0.8S纳米棒/2D Ti₃C₂纳米片肖特基异质结的构建及光催化产氢性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2010059 - .
[7]	梅子慧, 王国宏, 严素定, 王娟. 微波辅助快速制备2D/1D ZnIn₂S₄/TiO₂ S型异质结及其光催化制氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2009097 - .
[8]	刘阳, 郝旭强, 胡海强, 靳治良. 构建NiS₂/MoSe₂ S型异质结高效光催化产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2008030 - .
[9]	周雪梅. 二氧化钛负载单原子催化剂用于光催化反应的研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2008064 - .
[10]	金飘, 官自超, 梁燕, 谭凯, 王霞, 宋光铃, 杜荣归. NiO/TiO₂异质结构纳米管阵列膜对不锈钢的光生阴极保护及其储能性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 1906033 - .
[11]	李玉红,吴新平,刘聪,王萌,宋本腾,郁桂云,杨刚,侯文华,龚学庆,彭路明. 部分还原二氧化钛的NMR和EPR研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905021 - .
[12]	段树华,巫树锋,王磊,佘厚德,黄静伟,王其召. 棒状金属有机框架结构PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂复合材料的制备及其高效光催化CO₂还原性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3): 1905086 - .
[13]	程飞,杨建,闫亮,赵军,赵华华,宋焕玲,丑凌军. 固体酸WO₃/TiO₂负载锂锰催化剂组成对其甲烷氧化偶联反应性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1027 -1036 .
[14]	章家伟, 王晟, 刘福生, 付小杰, 马国权, 侯美顺, 唐卓. 缺陷TiO_2-x中空微球的制备及光催化降解亚甲基蓝性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 885 -895 .
[15]	弓程,向思弯,张泽阳,孙岚,叶陈清,林昌健. LaCoO₃-TiO₂纳米管阵列的构筑及可见光光催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 616 -623 .

羧基功能化石墨烯增强TiO₂光催化产氢性能

Carboxyl-Functionalized Graphene for Highly Efficient H₂-Evolution Activity of TiO₂ Photocatalyst

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 57

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0