锂金属电池中的复合负极

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008090

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (2): 2008090.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008090

所属专题：金属锂负极

锂金属电池中的复合负极

赵雨萌, 任凌霄, 王澳轩, 罗加严()

天津大学化工学院，天津 300072

收稿日期:2020-08-31 录用日期:2020-09-23 发布日期:2020-10-09
通讯作者: 罗加严 E-mail:jluo@tju.edu.cn
作者简介:Prof. Jiayan Luo received his BS/MS in Chemistry from Fudan University in 2006 and 2009, respectively. In 2013, he obtained his Ph.D from Northwestern University in the US. After working at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), he started his independent career in the School of Chemical Engineering at Tianjin University in 2014. His current interests focus on light metals for energy storage and additive manufacturing. He is a recipient of the International Society of Electrochemistry Applied Electrochemistry Award, Electrochemical Society Nanocarbon Young Investigator Award, Energy Storage Materials Young Scientist Award, Chinese Chemical Society Young Chemist Award, etc
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51872196);天津市自然科学基金(17JCJQJC44100);国家创新人才博士后计划(BX20190232)

Composite Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries

Yumeng Zhao, Lingxiao Ren, Aoxuan Wang, Jiayan Luo()

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

Received:2020-08-31 Accepted:2020-09-23 Published:2020-10-09
Contact: Jiayan Luo E-mail:jluo@tju.edu.cn
About author:Jiayan Luo, Email: jluo@tju.edu.cn
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51872196);the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China(17JCJQJC44100);the National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents, China(BX20190232)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

锂金属具有理论比容量高、电位低等优点，被认为是电极中的“圣杯”。然而，锂金属负极在循环过程当中存在着不可控的枝晶生长、体积膨胀等问题，严重地阻碍了锂金属电池的商业化进程。本综述首先概述了锂枝晶的形成机理，然后对由小及大，自内而外，总结了近年来三种不同层次的锂金属电池复合负极：锂金属负极内部结构的复合、锂金属电池内部结构的复合以及锂金属电池内部环境与外界操作条件的复合。最后，本综述对未来多层次锂金属电池复合负极的前景做出了展望。

关键词: 锂金属电池, 锂枝晶, 复合负极, 内部结构, 外界操作条件, 多层次复合

Abstract:

The applications of lithium-ion batteries have been limited because their energy density can no longer meet the requirements of an emerging energy society. Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) are being considered as potential candidate for next-generation energy storage systems owing to the high theoretical specific capacity and low electrochemical potential of lithium metal. However, the commercialization of LMB is limited due to several challenges, such as uncontrollable formation of dendrites, unstable solid electrolyte interface, and infinite anode volume change, which can lead to grievous catastrophe. In this study, several typical mechanisms of lithium dendrite formation and growth are summarized. The results suggest that a smaller current density, greater Li⁺ transference number, higher mechanical strength of the electrolyte, and a more homogeneous distribution of Li⁺ on the substrate are conducive to the uniform deposition morphology of lithium metal. In view of these results, combined with the researches on LMBs conducted in recent years, composite anodes can be summarized into three level from internal to external. (ⅰ) Internal composite of lithium metal anode: the scaffolds composited with lithium metal are classified as non-conductive (NC), electron-conductive (EC), ion-conductive (IC), and mixed ion and electron-conductive (MIEC) scaffolds. Composited with NC scaffolds, the tip effect can be weakened through the interaction between polar functional groups and Li⁺. The composite of lithium metal and EC scaffolds can effectively reduce the local current density, while IC scaffolds can increase the ion flux. However, the performance of LMBs may be hindered by the insulation of electrons or Li⁺ at high rates. In comparison, MIEC scaffolds can provide fast ion/electron transfer channels for the deposition or dissolution of lithium metal, which is beneficial for the electrochemical performance of LMBs even at high rates. (ⅱ) Internal composite of LMB: Compared with liquid electrolytes, solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) and quasi-solid-state electrolytes are much safer. However, their interfacial contact with lithium metal anodes has been seriously criticized. Lithium metal anodes can be composited with SSEs or quasi-solid-state electrolytes to optimize the interface contact performance and reduce the interface resistance, thereby promoting the development of solid-state batteries. (ⅲ) Composite of internal environment and external operating conditions: Composited with external physical fields, such as electric fields, magnetic fields, and temperature fields, the distribution of Li⁺ can be homogeneous and the initial nucleation process can be regulated. Overall, this review summarizes several composite anodes that have greatly optimized the performance of LMBs and highlights the potential of multi-level composites for applications in lithium metal anodes.

Key words: Lithium metal battery, Lithium dendrite, Composite anode, Internal structure, External operating condition, Multi-level composite

MSC2000:

O646

赵雨萌, 任凌霄, 王澳轩, 罗加严. 锂金属电池中的复合负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2008090.

Yumeng Zhao, Lingxiao Ren, Aoxuan Wang, Jiayan Luo. Composite Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2008090.

图/表 7

Table 1

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

参考文献 85

1	Grande L. ; Paillard E. ; Hassoun J. ; Park J. ; Lee Y. ; Sun Y. ; Passerini S. ; Scrosati B. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 784. doi: 10.1002/adma.201403064
2	Zhang X. ; Wang A. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 3223. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00437
3	Patil A. ; Patil V. ; Wook Shin D. ; Choi J. ; Paik D. ; Yoon S. Mater. Res. Bull. 2008, 43, 1913. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2007.08.031
4	Tarascon J. M. ; Armand M. Nature 2001, 414, 359. doi: 10.1038/35104644
5	Janek J. ; Zeier W. G. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16141. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.141
6	Zhang Z. ; Peng Z. ; Zheng J. ; Wang S. ; Liu Z. ; Bi Y. ; Chen Y. ; Wu G. ; Li H. ; Cui P. ; et al J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 9339. doi: 10.1039/C7TA02144E
7	Ye H. ; Xin S. ; Yin Y. ; Li J. ; Guo Y. ; Wan L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5916. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01763
8	Liu S. ; Zhang X. ; Li R. ; Gao L. ; Luo J. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 14, 143. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.004
9	Ma Q. ; Zhang X. ; Wang A. ; Xia Y. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2002824. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202002824
10	Wang C. ; Wang A. ; Ren L. ; Guan X. ; Wang D. ; Dong A. ; Zhang C. ; Li G. ; Luo J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1905940. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201905940
11	Ren L. ; Wang A. ; Zhang X. ; Li G. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 10, 1902932. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201902932
12	Tikekar M. D. ; Choudhury S. ; Tu Z. ; Archer L. A. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16114. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.114
13	Lin D. ; Liu Y. ; Liang Z. ; Lee H. ; Sun J. ; Wang H. ; Yan K. ; Xie J. ; Cui Y. Nat. Nanotech. 2016, 11, 626. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.32
14	Ye H. ; Zhang Y. ; Yin Y. ; Cao F. ; Guo Y. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 661. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00351
15	Ye H. ; Xin S. ; Yin Y. ; Guo Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700530. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700530
16	Shi P. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Shen X. ; Zhang R. ; Liu H. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Mater. Technol-US. 2020, 5, 1900806. doi: 10.1002/admt.201900806
17	Zhang R. ; Cheng X. ; Zhao C. ; Peng H. ; Shi J. ; Huang J. ; Wang J. ; Wei F. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2155. doi: 10.1002/adma.201504117
18	Guan X. ; Wang A. ; Liu S. ; Li G. ; Liang F. ; Yang Y. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Small 2018, 14, 1801423. doi: 10.1002/smll.201801423
19	Cheng X. ; Zhang R. ; Zhao C. ; Wei F. ; Zhang J. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500213. doi: 10.1002/advs.201500213
20	Zhang H. ; Eshetu G. G. ; Judez X. ; Li C. ; Rodriguez Martínez L. M. ; Armand M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 130, 15220. doi: 10.1002/ange.201712702
21	Li N. ; Yin Y. ; Yang C. ; Guo Y. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 1853. doi: 10.1002/adma.201504526
22	Liu Y. ; Lin D. ; Yuen P. Y. ; Liu K. ; Xie J. ; Dauskardt R. H. ; Cui Y. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1605531. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605531
23	Wang A. ; Zhang X. ; Yang Y. ; Huang J. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Chem 2018, 4, 2192. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.06.017
24	Liu S. ; Wang A. ; Li Q. ; Wu J. ; Chiou K. ; Huang J. ; Luo J. Joule 2018, 2, 184. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.11.004
25	Guo W. ; Liu S. ; Guan X. ; Zhang X. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900193. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900193
26	Zhang X. ; Lv R. ; Wang A. ; Guo W. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 130, 15248. doi: 10.1002/ange.201808714
27	Tang W. ; Tang S. ; Guan X. ; Zhang X. ; Xiang Q. ; Luo J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1900648. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201900648
28	Tang W. ; Tang S. ; Zhang C. ; Ma Q. ; Xiang Q. ; Yang Y. ; Luo J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800866. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201800866
29	Gopalan A. ; Santhosh P. ; Manesh K. ; Nho J. ; Kim S. ; Hwang C. ; Lee K. J. Membrane Sci. 2008, 325, 683. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.08.047
30	Zhang W. ; Tu Z. ; Qian J. ; Choudhury S. ; Archer L. A. ; Lu Y. Small 2018, 14, 1703001. doi: 10.1002/smll.201703001
31	Goodenough J. B. Energy Storage Mater. 2015, 1, 158. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2015.07.001
32	Chazalviel J. N. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 42, 7355. doi: 10.1103/physreva.42.7355
33	Monroe C. ; Newman J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A396. doi: 10.1149/1.1850854
34	Zuo T. ; Wu X. ; Yang C. ; Yin Y. ; Ye H. ; Li N. ; Guo Y. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700389. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700389
35	Liang Z. ; Lin D. ; Zhao J. ; Lu Z. ; Liu Y. ; Liu C. ; Lu Y. ; Wang H. ; Yan K. ; Tao X. ; et al Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113, 2862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518188113
36	Chi S. ; Liu Y. ; Song W. ; Fan L. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1700348. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201700348
37	Chen K. ; Sanchez A. J. ; Kazyak E. ; Davis A. L. ; Dasgupta N. P. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802534. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201802534
38	Yang C. ; Yin Y. ; Zhang S. ; Li N. ; Guo Y. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8058. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9058
39	Lin D. ; Zhao J. ; Sun J. ; Yao H. ; Liu Y. ; Yan K. ; Cui Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 4613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619489114
40	Liu Y. ; Lin D. ; Liang Z. ; Zhao J. ; Yan K. ; Cui Y. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10992. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10992
41	Yamaki J. ; Tobishima S. ; Hayashi K. ; Keiichi S. ; Nemoto Y. ; Arakawa M. J. Power Sources 1998, 74, 219. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00067-6
42	Huang Y. ; Chen B. ; Duan J. ; Yang F. ; Wang T. ; Wang Z. ; Yang W. ; Hu C. ; Luo W. ; Huang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 132, 3728. doi: 10.1002/ange.201914417
43	Kim K. H. ; Iriyama Y. ; Yamamoto K. ; Kumazaki S. ; Asaka T. ; Tanabe K. ; Fisher C. A. J. ; Hirayama T. ; Murugan R. ; Ogumi Z. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 764. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.073
44	Yang C. ; Zhang L. ; Liu B. ; Xu S. ; Hamann T. ; McOwen D. ; Dai J. ; Luo W. ; Gong Y. ; Wachsman E. D. ; et al Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115, 3770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719758115
45	Zhang Y. ; Shi Y. ; Hu X. C. ; Wang W. P. ; Wen R. ; Xin S. ; Guo Y. G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 10, 1903325. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903325
46	Xu S. ; Mcowen D. W. ; Wang C. ; Zhang L. ; Luo W. ; Chen C. ; Li Y. ; Gong Y. ; Dai J. ; Kuang Y. ; et al Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 3926. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01295
47	Liu B. ; Zhang L. ; Xu S. ; Mcowen D. W. ; Gong Y. ; Yang C. ; Pastel G. R. ; Xie H. ; Fu K. ; Dai J. ; et al Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 14, 376. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.015
48	Liu Y. ; Lin D. ; Jin Y. ; Liu K. ; Tao X. ; Zhang Q. ; Zhang X. ; Cui Y. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, o713. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao0713
49	Wang D. ; Zhang W. ; Zheng W. ; Cui X. ; Rojo T. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600168. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600168
50	Yun Q. ; He Y. ; Lv W. ; Zhao Y. ; Li B. ; Kang F. ; Yang Q. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6932. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601409
51	Li Q. ; Zhu S. ; Lu Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1606422. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201606422
52	Liang Z. ; Zheng G. ; Liu C. ; Liu N. ; Li W. ; Yan K. ; Yao H. ; Hsu P. ; Chu S. ; Cui Y. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2910. doi: 10.1021/nl5046318
53	Cheng X. ; Hou T. ; Zhang R. ; Peng H. ; Zhao C. ; Huang J. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2888. doi: 10.1002/adma.201506124
54	Yan K. ; Lu Z. ; Lee H. ; Xiong F. ; Hsu P. ; Li Y. ; Zhao J. ; Chu S. ; Cui Y. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16010. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.10
55	Wang S. ; Yin Y. ; Zuo T. ; Dong W. ; Li J. ; Shi J. ; Zhang C. ; Li N. ; Li C. ; Guo Y. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703729. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703729
56	Ye H. ; Zheng Z. J. ; Yao H. R. ; Liu S. C. ; Zuo T. T. ; Wu X. W. ; Yin Y. X. ; Li N. W. ; Gu J. J. ; Cao F. F. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 1094. doi: 10.1002/anie.201811955
57	Tang W. ; Yin X. ; Kang S. ; Chen Z. ; Tian B. ; Teo S. L. ; Wang X. ; Chi X. ; Loh K. P. ; Lee H. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801745. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801745
58	Liang X. ; Pang Q. ; Kochetkov I. R. ; Sempere M. S. ; Huang H. ; Sun X. ; Nazar L. F. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17119. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.119
59	Yu Y. ; Huang W. ; Song X. ; Wang W. ; Hou Z. ; Zhao X. ; Deng K. ; Ju H. ; Sun Y. ; Zhao Y. ; et al Electrochim. Acta 2019, 294, 413. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.117
60	Liu L. ; Yin Y. ; Li J. ; Li N. ; Zeng X. ; Ye H. ; Guo Y. ; Wan L. Joule 2017, 1, 563. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.06.004
61	Salvatierra R. V. ; López G. A. ; Jalilov A. S. ; Yoon J. ; Wu G. ; Tsai A. L. ; Tour J. M. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803869. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803869
62	Kim H. ; Chou C. ; Ekerdt J. G. ; Hwang G. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 115, 2514. doi: 10.1021/jp1083899
63	Ma J. ; Wang C. ; Wroblewski S. J. Power Sources 2007, 164, 849. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.11.024
64	Zhang C. ; Liu S. ; Li G. ; Zhang C. ; Liu X. ; Luo J. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801328. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801328
65	Yan C. ; Cheng X. ; Yao Y. ; Shen X. ; Li B. ; Li W. ; Zhang R. ; Huang J. ; Li H. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1804461. doi: 10.1002/adma.201804461
66	Yang C. ; Xie H. ; Ping W. ; Fu K. ; Liu B. ; Rao J. ; Dai J. ; Wang C. ; Pastel G. ; Hu L. Adv. Mater. 2018, 31, 1804815. doi: 10.1002/adma.201804815
67	Murugan R. ; Thangadurai V. ; Weppner W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7778. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701144
68	Gu L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 331.
	谷林. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 331. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201709281
69	Bouchet R. ; Maria S. ; Meziane R. ; Aboulaich A. ; Lienafa L. ; Bonnet J. ; Phan T. N. T. ; Bertin D. ; Gigmes D. ; Devaux D. ; et al Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 452. doi: 10.1038/nmat3602
70	Fu K. K. ; Gong Y. ; Liu B. ; Zhu Y. ; Xu S. ; Yao Y. ; Luo W. ; Wang C. ; Lacey S. D. ; Dai J. ; et al Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1601659. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601659
71	Tsai C. L. ; Roddatis V. ; Chandran C. V. ; Ma Q. ; Uhlenbruck S. ; Bram M. ; Heitjans P. ; Guillon O. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10617. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00831
72	Sharafi A. ; Kazyak E. ; Davis A. L. ; Yu S. ; Thompson T. ; Siegel D. J. ; Dasgupta N. P. ; Sakamoto J. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7961. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03002
73	Li Y. ; Zhou W. ; Chen X. ; Lü X. ; Cui Z. ; Xin S. ; Xue L. ; Jia Q. ; Goodenough J. B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016, 113, 13313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615912113
74	Yu R. ; Du Q. ; Zou B. ; Wen Z. ; Chen C. J. Power Sources 2016, 306, 623. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.065
75	Zheng J. ; Tang M. ; Hu Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 128, 12726. doi: 10.1002/ange.201607539
76	Trevey J. E. ; Jung Y. S. ; Lee S. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 4243. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.086
77	Bai P. ; Li J. ; Brushett F. R. ; Bazant M. Z. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3221. doi: 10.1039/C6EE01674J
78	Wang D. ; Zhang W. ; Zheng W. ; Cui X. ; Rojo T. ; Zhang Q. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600168. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600168
79	Monzon L. M. A. ; Coey J. M. D. Electrochem. Commun. 2014, 42, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.02.006
80	Chopart J. P. ; Aaboubi O. ; Merienne E. ; Olivier A. ; Amblard J. Energy Convers. Manage. 2002, 43, 365. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00110-8
81	Wang A. ; Deng Q. ; Deng L. ; Guan X. ; Luo J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1902630. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201902630
82	Shen K. ; Wang Z. ; Bi X. ; Ying Y. ; Zhang D. ; Jin C. ; Hou G. ; Cao H. ; Wu L. ; Zheng G. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900260. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900260
83	Chen Y. ; Dou X. ; Wang K. ; Han Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900019. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900019
84	Li L. ; Basu S. ; Wang Y. ; Chen Z. ; Hundekar P. ; Wang B. ; Shi J. ; Shi Y. ; Narayanan S. ; Koratkar N. Science 2018, 359, 1513. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8787
85	Yan K. ; Wang J. ; Zhao S. ; Zhou D. ; Sun B. ; Cui Y. ; Wang G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 11364. doi: 10.1002/ange.201905251

Model	Solution	Strategy with composite anodes	Ref.
Space charged model	Reduce effective current density/increase Li⁺ mobility/uniformize Li⁺ distribution	Composite with scaffolds	32
Plating model	Mechanically blocking	Composite with solid electrolytes	41
Charge induced model	Homogenize surface charge distribution	Composite with physical fields	49

[1]	关俊, 李念武, 于乐. 人工界面层在金属锂负极中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2009011 -0 .
[2]	钱华明, 李喜飞. 功能化固态电解质膜改性锂金属负极的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2008092 -0 .
[3]	吴晨, 周颖, 朱晓龙, 詹忞之, 杨汉西, 钱江锋. 锂金属电池用高浓度电解液体系研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2008044 -0 .
[4]	张云博, 林乔伟, 韩俊伟, 韩志远, 李曈, 康飞宇, 杨全红, 吕伟. 细菌纤维素衍生的三维碳集流体用于无枝晶的锂金属负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2008088 -0 .
[5]	王木钦, 彭哲, 林欢, 李振东, 刘健, 任重民, 何海勇, 王德宇. 一种有助于稳定锂金属循环的富氟化位点框架结构[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2007016 -0 .
[6]	王骞, 吴恺, 王航超, 刘文, 周恒辉. 亲锂的三维二硫化锡@碳纤维布用于稳定的锂金属负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2007092 -0 .
[7]	秦金利, 任龙涛, 曹欣, 赵亚军, 许海军, 刘文, 孙晓明. 多孔泡沫铜和硫脲协同作用构筑无枝晶锂负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2009020 -0 .
[8]	刘凡凡, 张志文, 叶淑芬, 姚雨, 余彦. 锂金属负极的挑战与改善策略研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2006021 -0 .
[9]	郑国瑞, 向宇轩, 杨勇. 中子深度剖析技术研究可充锂金属负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2008094 -0 .
[10]	刘亚, 郑磊, 谷巍, 沈炎宾, 陈立桅. 原位聚合表面修饰的金属锂负极[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2004058 -0 .
[11]	孙明明;张世超. 锂离子电池用纳米Sn/SnSb合金三维复合负极的制备及性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2007, 23(12): 1937 -1942 .

锂金属电池中的复合负极

Composite Anodes for Lithium Metal Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 85

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10