层间共价增强石墨烯材料的构筑、性能与应用

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202011059

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大批量石墨烯可控制备技术的逐渐成熟为实现其宏观组装和应用提供了基础。在众多的组装策略中，调节石墨烯层间的界面相互作用可以直接影响组装体的力学、电学、热学以及渗透等性质，具有重要的意义。石墨烯片层间以共价键连接的层间共价石墨烯材料以其可调的层间距、较强的层间作用力、丰富的功能化、以及可能的原子构型重排等特性，受到了广泛的关注和深入的研究。相比于其他非共价的键合手段，共价连接是一种更为牢固的枢纽。本文中我们将总结讨论层间共价石墨烯材料的构筑方法、性能以及应用。在构筑方法中，依据石墨烯本身的制备方法分为氧化还原法以及化学气相沉积法，而在氧化还原法中，以其宏观材料的形貌分为纸状和纤维状来讨论。接着，我们重点介绍了层间共价对其力学和电学性能的影响，并概述了此类宏观组装体材料的应用。层间共价石墨烯材料继承了石墨烯自身优异的特性，同时也具有宏观组装所赋予的性能，有望在多个领域得到广泛的应用。

关键词: 石墨烯, 共价键, 金刚烯, 组装, 力学性质

Abstract:

The development of large-scale and controlled graphene production lays the foundation for macroscopic assembly. Among the diverse assembly strategies, modulating the interlayer interaction of graphene nanosheets is of vital importance because it determines the mechanical, electrical, thermal, and permeation properties of the macroscopic objects. Depending on the nature and strength of the interlayer interaction, covalent and noncovalent bondings, such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interaction, π-π interaction, and van der Waals force, are classified as two main types of interlayer connection methods, which solely or synergistically link the individual graphene nanosheets for practical macroscopic materials. Among them, the covalent bonding within the interlayer space renders graphene assembly adjusted interlayer distance, strong interlayer interaction, a rich diversity of functionalities, and potential atomic configuration reconstruction, which has attracted considerable research attention. Compared with other noncovalent assembly methods, covalent connections are stronger and thus more stable; however, there are some issues that remain. First, the covalent modification of the graphene surface depends on the defects and/or functional groups, which becomes difficult for graphene films free of surface imperfections. Second, the covalent connection partly alters the sp² hybrid carbon atoms to sp³, resulting in a deteriorated electrical conductivity. Thus, the electrical properties of the macroscopic assembly are far inferior to those of the constituent nanosheets, thereby restricting their applications. Lastly, covalent bonding is naturally rigid, rendering high modulus and strength to the graphene assembly while impairing the toughness. As in certain applications, both high strength and toughness are required; thus, a balanced covalent and noncovalent interaction is required. In this review, we discuss the recent progress in the construction method, properties, and applications of the interlayer covalently connected graphene materials. In the construction method, graphene is classified according to the synthesis method as oxidation-reduction and chemical vapor deposition method, wherein the latter represents graphene without abundant surface bonding sites and is hard to be covalently connected. For the former graphene produced by the oxidation-reduction method, the paper and fiber assembly forms are discussed. Then, the influence of covalent bonding on the mechanical and electrical properties is studied. Note that both the enhancement and potential impairments caused by covalent bonding are addressed. Finally, the applications in electrical devices, energy storage, and ion separation are summarized. The interlayer covalently connected macroscopic graphene material unifies the exceptional properties of graphene and the advantages of assembly strategy and will find applications in related fields. Moreover, it will also inspire the assembly of other graphene-like two-dimensional materials for a richer diversity of applications.

Key words: Graphene, Covalent bond, Diamane, Assembly, Mechanical property

MSC2000:

O641

梁涛, 王斌. 层间共价增强石墨烯材料的构筑、性能与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(1): 2011059.

Tao Liang, Bin Wang. Interlayer Covalently Enhanced Graphene Materials: Construction, Properties, and Applications[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(1): 2011059.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 77

1	Novoselov K. S. ; Geim A. K. ; Morozov S. V. ; Jiang D. ; Zhang Y. ; Dubonos S. V. ; Grigorieva I. V. ; Firsov A. A. Science 2004, 306, 666. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896
2	Lee C. ; Wei X. ; Kysar J. W. ; Hone J. Science 2008, 321, 382. doi: 10.1126/science.1156211
3	Stoller M. D. ; Park S. ; Zhu Y. ; An J. ; Ruoff R. S. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3498. doi: 10.1021/nl802558y
4	Balandin A. A. ; Ghosh S. ; Bao W. ; Calizo I. ; Teweldebrhan D. ; Miao F. ; Lau C. N. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 902. doi: 10.1021/nl0731872
5	Hummers W. S. ; Offeman R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. doi: 10.1021/ja01539a017
6	Paton K. R. ; Varrla E. ; Backes C. ; Smith R. J. ; Khan U. ; O'Neill A. ; Boland C. ; Lotya M. ; Istrate O. M. ; King P. ; et al Nature Mater. 2014, 13, 624. doi: 10.1038/nmat3944
7	Li X. ; Cai W. ; An J. ; Kim S. ; Nah J. ; Yang D. ; Piner R. ; Velamakanni A. ; Jung I. ; Tutuc E. ; et al Science 2009, 324, 1312. doi: 10.1126/science.1171245
8	Liang T. ; Kong Y. ; Chen H. ; Xu M. Chin. J. Chem. 2016, 34, 32. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201500429
9	Lin Y.-M. ; Dimitrakopoulos C. ; Jenkins K. A. ; Farmer D. B. ; Chiu H.-Y. ; Grill A. ; Avouris P. Science 2010, 327, 662. doi: 10.1126/science.1184289
10	Zhang Y. ; Gong S. ; Zhang Q. ; Ming P. ; Wan S. ; Peng J. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2378. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00258C
11	Pan L. ; Liu Y. ; Zhong M. ; Xie X. Small 2020, 16, 1902779. doi: 10.1002/smll.201902779
12	Rao C. N. R. ; Pramoda K. ; Kumar R. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 10093. doi: 10.1039/C7CC05390H
13	Shehzad K. ; Xu Y. ; Gao C. ; Duan X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5541. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00218H
14	Cong H.-P. ; Chen J.-F. ; Yu S.-H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7295. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00181H
15	Georgakilas V. ; Tiwari J. N. ; Kemp K. C. ; Perman J. A. ; Bourlinos A. B. ; Kim K. S. ; Zboril R. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5464. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00620
16	Dikin D. A. ; Stankovich S. ; Zimney E. J. ; Piner R. D. ; Dommett G. H. B. ; Evmenenko G. ; Nguyen S. T. ; Ruoff R. S. Nature 2007, 448, 457. doi: 10.1038/nature06016
17	Gao Y. ; Liu L.-Q. ; Zu S.-Z. ; Peng K. ; Zhou D. ; Han B.-H. ; Zhang Z. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 2134. doi: 10.1021/nn103331x
18	Cao C. ; Daly M. ; Chen B. ; Howe J. Y. ; Singh C. V. ; Filleter T. ; Sun Y. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6528. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02173
19	Park S. ; Dikin D. A. ; Nguyen S. T. ; Ruoff R. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 15801. doi: 10.1021/jp907613s
20	An Z. ; Compton O. C. ; Putz K. W. ; Brinson L. C. ; Nguyen S. T. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3842. doi: 10.1002/adma.201101544
21	Tian Y. ; Cao Y. ; Wang Y. ; Yang W. ; Feng J. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2980. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300118
22	Compton O. C. ; Dikin D. A. ; Putz K. W. ; Brinson L. C. ; Nguyen S. T. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 892. doi: 10.1002/adma.200902069
23	Bourlinos A. B. ; Gournis D. ; Petridis D. ; Szabó T. ; Szeri A. ; Dékány I. Langmuir 2003, 19, 6050. doi: 10.1021/la026525h
24	Matsuo Y. ; Watanabe K. ; Fukutsuka T. ; Sugie Y. Carbon 2003, 41, 1545. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00079-4
25	Matsuo Y. ; Miyabe T. ; Fukutsuka T. ; Sugie Y. Carbon 2007, 45, 1005. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.12.023
26	Chen H. ; Müller M. B. ; Gilmore K. J. ; Wallace G. G. ; Li D. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 3557. doi: 10.1002/adma.200800757
27	Wan S. ; Li Y. ; Mu J. ; Aliev A. E. ; Fang S. ; Kotov N. A. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. ; Baughman R. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018, 115, 5359. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719111115
28	Xu Z. ; Gao C. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 571. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1583
29	Xu Z. ; Sun H. ; Zhao X. ; Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 188. doi: 10.1002/adma.201203448
30	Xu Z. ; Gao C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1267. doi: 10.1021/ar4002813
31	Xu Z. ; Liu Y. ; Zhao X. ; Peng L. ; Sun H. ; Xu Y. ; Ren X. ; Jin C. ; Xu P. ; Wang M. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6449. doi: 10.1002/adma.201506426
32	Huang G. ; Hou C. ; Shao Y. ; Wang H. ; Zhang Q. ; Li Y. ; Zhu M. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 4248. doi: 10.1038/srep04248
33	Xu Z. ; Liu Z. ; Sun H. ; Gao C. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3249. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300774
34	Kou L. ; Gao C. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4370. doi: 10.1039/c3nr00455d
35	Liu Z. ; Xu Z. ; Hu X. ; Gao C. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 6931. doi: 10.1021/ma400681v
36	Zhao X. ; Xu Z. ; Zheng B. ; Gao C. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3164. doi: 10.1038/srep03164
37	Li M. ; Zhang X. ; Wang X. ; Ru Y. ; Qiao J. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 6511. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03108
38	Zhang Y. ; Li Y. ; Ming P. ; Zhang Q. ; Liu T. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2834. doi: 10.1002/adma.201506074
39	Liang T. ; Luan C. ; Chen H. ; Xu M. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3719. doi: 10.1039/C7NR00188F
40	Habib M. R. ; Liang T. ; Yu X. ; Pi X. ; Liu Y. ; Xu M. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2018, 81, 036501. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/aa9bbf
41	Liang T. ; Habib M. R. ; Kong Y. ; Cai Y. ; Chen H. ; Fujita D. ; Lin C.-T. ; Liu Y. ; Yu C. ; Su H. ; et al Carbon 2019, 147, 120. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.075
42	Odkhuu D. ; Shin D. ; Ruoff R. S. ; Park N. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3276. doi: 10.1038/srep03276
43	Barboza A. P. M. ; Guimaraes M. H. D. ; Massote D. V. P. ; Campos L. C. ; Barbosa Neto N. M. ; Cancado L. G. ; Lacerda R. G. ; Chacham H. ; Mazzoni M. S. C. ; Neves B. R. A. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3014. doi: 10.1002/adma.201101061
44	Martins L. G. P. ; Matos M. J. S. ; Paschoal A. R. ; Freire P. T. C. ; Andrade N. F. ; Aguiar A. L. ; Kong J. ; Neves B. R. A. ; de Oliveira A. B. ; Mazzoni M. S. C. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 96. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00149-8
45	Chernozatonskii L. A. ; Sorokin P. B. ; Kvashnin A. G. ; Kvashnin D. G. JEPT Lett. 2009, 90, 134. doi: 10.1134/S0021364009140112
46	Kvashnin A. G. ; Chernozatonskii L. A. ; Yakobson B. I. ; Sorokin P. B. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 676. doi: 10.1021/nl403938g
47	Luo Z. ; Yu T. ; Kim K. ; Ni Z. ; You Y. ; Lim S. ; Shen Z. ; Wang S. ; Lin J. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1781. doi: 10.1021/nn900371t
48	Ke F. ; Zhang L. ; Chen Y. ; Yin K. ; Wang C. ; Tzeng Y.-K. ; Lin Y. ; Dong H. ; Liu Z. ; Tse J. S. ; et al Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 5916. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01872
49	Tao Z. ; Du J. ; Qi Z. ; Ni K. ; Jiang S. ; Zhu Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 133101. doi: 10.1063/1.5135027
50	Gao Y. ; Cao T. ; Cellini F. ; Berger C. ; de Heer W. A. ; Tosatti E. ; Riedo E. ; Bongiorno A. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 133. doi: 10.1038/s41565-017-0023-9
51	Rajasekaran S. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Ogasawara H. ; Nilsson A. ; Kaya S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 085503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.085503
52	Bakharev P. V. ; Huang M. ; Saxena M. ; Lee S. W. ; Joo S. H. ; Park S. O. ; Dong J. ; Camacho-Mojica D. C. ; Jin S. ; Kwon Y. ; et al Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 59. doi: 10.1038/s41565-019-0582-z
53	Cheng T. ; Liu Z. ; Liu Z. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 13819. doi: 10.1039/D0TC03253K
54	Suk J. W. ; Piner R. D. ; An J. ; Ruoff R. S. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 6557. doi: 10.1021/nn101781v
55	Cao C. ; Daly M. ; Singh C. V. ; Sun Y. ; Filleter T. Carbon 2015, 81, 497. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.082
56	Papageorgiou D. G. ; Kinloch I. A. ; Young R. J. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 90, 75. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004
57	Márquez-Lamas U. ; Martínez-Guerra E. ; Toxqui-Terán A. ; Aguirre-Tostado F. S. ; Lara-Ceniceros T. E. ; Bonilla-Cruz J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 852. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09961
58	Lee W. ; Lee J. U. ; Jung B. M. ; Byun J.-H. ; Yi J.-W. ; Lee S.-B. ; Kim B.-S. Carbon 2013, 65, 296. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.029
59	Ma T. ; Gao H.-L. ; Cong H.-P. ; Yao H.-B. ; Wu L. ; Yu Z.-Y. ; Chen S.-M. ; Yu S.-H. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706435. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706435
60	Jia Z. ; Wang Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 4405. doi: 10.1039/C4TA06193D
61	Nam Y. T. ; Choi J. ; Kang K. M. ; Kim D. W. ; Jung H.-T. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 27376. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b09912
62	Lim M.-Y. ; Choi Y.-S. ; Kim J. ; Kim K. ; Shin H. ; Kim J.-J. ; Shin D. M. ; Lee J.-C. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 521, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.067
63	Yoon S. S. ; Lee K. E. ; Cha H.-J. ; Seong D. G. ; Um M.-K. ; Byun J.-H. ; Oh Y. ; Oh J. H. ; Lee W. ; Lee J. U. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16366. doi: 10.1038/srep16366
64	Gao H. ; Xiao F. ; Ching C. B. ; Duan H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 7020. doi: 10.1021/am302280b
65	Ma Y. ; Zheng Y. ; Zhu Y. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 9. doi: 10.1007/s40843-019-9462-9
66	Zhu Y. ; Ji H. ; Cheng H.-M. ; Ruoff R. S. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2018, 5, 90. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwx055
67	Shen B. ; Zhai W. ; Zheng W. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4542. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201400079
68	Wang N. ; Samani M. K. ; Li H. ; Dong L. ; Zhang Z. ; Su P. ; Chen S. ; Chen J. ; Huang S. ; Yuan G. ; et al Small 2018, 14, 1801346. doi: 10.1002/smll.201801346
69	Han H. ; Zhang Y. ; Wang N. ; Samani M. K. ; Ni Y. ; Mijbil Z. Y. ; Edwards M. ; Xiong S. ; Sääskilahti K. ; Murugesan M. ; et al Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11281. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11281
70	Jia Z. ; Wang Y. ; Shi W. ; Wang J. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 520, 139. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.07.042
71	Cao M.-S. ; Wang X.-X. ; Cao W.-Q. ; Yuan J. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 6589. doi: 10.1039/C5TC01354B
72	Song W.-L. ; Fan L.-Z. ; Cao M.-S. ; Lu M.-M. ; Wang C.-Y. ; Wang J. ; Chen T.-T. ; Li Y. ; Hou Z.-L. ; Liu J. ; et al J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 5057. doi: 10.1039/C4TC00517A
73	Liu Y. ; Liang H. ; Xu Z. ; Xi J. ; Chen G. ; Gao W. ; Xue M. ; Gao C. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 4301. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01491
74	Zhang M. ; Huang L. ; Chen J. ; Li C. ; Shi G. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 7588. doi: 10.1002/adma.201403322
75	Lin X. ; Shen X. ; Zheng Q. ; Yousefi N. ; Ye L. ; Mai Y.-W. ; Kim J.-K. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 10708. doi: 10.1021/nn303904z
76	Cheng Q. ; Wu M. ; Li M. ; Jiang L. ; Tang Z. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 3838. doi: 10.1002/ange.201210166
77	Cui W. ; Li M. ; Liu J. ; Wang B. ; Zhang C. ; Jiang L. ; Cheng Q. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 9511. doi: 10.1021/nn503755c

Materials	Young’s Modulus/GPa	Tensile Strength /MPa	Strain/%	Reference
Monolayer Graphene	1000	130000	–	²
GO Paper	32	100	0.6	¹⁶
Glutaraldehyde-GO Paper	30.4	101	0.4	¹⁷
Polyallylamine-GO Paper	33.3 ± 2.7	91.9 ± 22.4	0.32 ± 0.08	¹⁹
Boron-GO Paper	127 ± 4	185 ± 30	–	²⁰
PEI Crosslinked GO Paper	103.4	209.9	–	²¹
GO Fiber	5.4	102	6.8–10.1	²⁸
Phenolic Resin-GO Fiber	120	1450	1.8	³⁷
Monolayer GO	207.6 ± 23.4	–	–	⁵⁴
Monolayer rGO	250	–	–	⁵⁶

[1]	彭景淞, 程群峰. 仿鲍鱼壳石墨烯多功能纳米复合材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2005006 -0 .
[2]	毛赫南, 王晓工. 影响高浓度氧化石墨烯分散液流变行为的重要因素及群体平衡动力学分析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2004025 -0 .
[3]	杨贻顺, 周敏, 邢燕霞. 基于γ-石墨炔分子磁隧道结对称性依赖的输运性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2003004 -0 .
[4]	薄拯, 孔竞, 杨化超, 郑周威, 陈鹏鹏, 严建华, 岑可法. 基于混合溶剂有机电解液的超低温孔洞石墨烯超级电容[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2005054 -0 .
[5]	唐诗怡, 鹿高甜, 苏毅, 王广, 李炫璋, 张广琦, 魏洋, 张跃钢. 石墨烯嵌锂的拉曼成像[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 2001007 -0 .
[6]	樊晔, 曹崇梅, 方云, 夏咏梅. 自交联共轭亚油酸囊泡基荧光纳米点的构筑及其荧光特性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 2002032 -0 .
[7]	程熠, 王坤, 亓月, 刘忠范. 石墨烯纤维材料的化学气相沉积生长方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2006046 -0 .
[8]	姜蓓, 孙靖宇, 刘忠范. 石墨烯晶圆的制备：从高品质到规模化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2007068 -0 .
[9]	蹇木强, 张莹莹, 刘忠范. 石墨烯纤维：制备、性能与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2007093 -0 .
[10]	姜美慧, 盛利志, 王超, 江丽丽, 范壮军. 超级电容器用石墨烯薄膜：制备、基元结构及表面调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2012085 -0 .
[11]	王键, 尹波, 高天, 王星懿, 李望, 洪兴星, 汪竹青, 何海勇. 还原氧化石墨烯改性少层剥离石墨增强石墨基钾离子电池负极稳定性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2012088 -0 .
[12]	张梦迪, 陈蓓, 吴明铂. 石墨烯作为硫载体在锂硫电池中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2101001 -0 .
[13]	刘学伟, 牛莹, 曹瑞雄, 陈晓红, 商红岩, 宋怀河. 石墨烯包覆天然球形石墨作为锂离子电池的负极材料，是否需要乙炔黑导电剂？[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2012062 -0 .
[14]	杜亚东, 孟祥桐, 汪珍, 赵鑫, 邱介山. 石墨烯基二氧化碳电化学还原催化剂的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2101009 -0 .
[15]	程婷, 孙禄钊, 刘志荣, 丁峰, 刘忠范. 金属衬底在石墨烯化学气相沉积生长中的作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(1): 2012006 -0 .