不同孪晶界密度银纳米线拉伸形变行为的分子动力学模拟

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201409101

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用分子动力学方法模拟了不同孪晶界密度银纳米线的拉伸形变行为, 分析了孪晶界密度对多晶银纳米线屈服强度、弹性模量和塑性变形机理的影响. 在弹性形变区域, 孪晶界的存在对杨氏模量变化的作用不明显. 在塑性形变阶段, 首先从表面边缘开始产生位错成核, 然后延伸并受阻于孪晶界. 在进一步拉伸载荷作用下, 孪晶界将作为位错源产生新的位错. 模拟结果表明, 银纳米线的强度与孪晶界和晶粒的尺寸有关. 孪晶界密度较小(即晶粒的长径比大于1)时, 此纳米线的屈服应力比单晶纳米线还要小, 只有当孪晶界密度较大时(即晶粒的长径比小于1), 孪晶界使得纳米线得到强化. 综合分析了孪晶界和晶粒尺寸对银纳米线的影响, 为构建高强度金属纳米线打下基础. 最后讨论了温度和拉伸速度对孪晶纳米线屈服应力所产生的影响, 随着温度的升高, 孪晶纳米线与单晶纳米线的屈服应力差先升高后趋于稳定; 当拉伸速度逐渐增大, 孪晶纳米线与单晶纳米线的屈服应力差先稳定后增大.

关键词: 银纳米线, 孪晶界, 单轴拉伸, 分子动力学模拟, 纳米器件, 长径比

Abstract:

The deformation mechanisms and mechanical tensile behavior of Ag nanowires containing different densities of parallel twin boundaries were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. The effect of twin boundaries on the Young's modulus in nanowires was not obvious in the elastic deformation stage. After the elastic deformation stage, the initial dislocation from the edge of the free surfaces in nanowires resulted in plastic deformation. The existence of the twin boundary in nanowires will cause the spread of the dislocation and act as sources of dislocations with the assistance of the newly formed defects with further tension load. The simulation showed that the mechanical strength of Ag nanowires was highly dependent on the twin boundary spacing and the size of the grain, resulting from the aspect ratio between the spacing distance and the length of the cross-section. In particular, twinned Ag nanowires with small twin density (aspect ratio > 1) had small yielding stresses, even less than that of the single crystal Ag nanowires. Only with large twin density (aspect ratio < 1) can the nanowires be strengthened by the structure of the twin boundaries. We also investigated the effects of tensile rate and temperature on the yielding strength of the Ag nanowires. With increasing temperature, the difference of yielding stress between twinned nanowires and single crystal nanowires first increased and then decreased to a stable level. With increasing tensile rate, this difference showed the opposite trend.

Key words: Ag nanowire, Twin boundary, Uniaxial tension, Molecular dynamics simulation, Nanometer device, Aspect ratio

MSC2000:

O641

孙倩, 杨熊博, 高亚军, 赵健伟. 不同孪晶界密度银纳米线拉伸形变行为的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(11): 2015-2023.

SUN Qian, YANG Xiong-Bo, GAO Ya-Jun, ZHAO Jian-Wei. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Deformation Behavior of Ag Nanowires with Different Twin Boundary Density under Tension Loading[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2014, 30(11): 2015-2023.

参考文献

(1) Sun,W.; Zhang, J. J.; Zhao, J.W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29, 1931. [孙玮, 张晋江, 赵健伟. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29, 1931.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201305311
(2) Branicio, P. S.; Rino, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, 16950. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.16950
(3) Ikeda, H.; Qi, Y.; Cagin, T.; Samwer, K.; Johnson,W. L.; Goddard,W. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 2900. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2900
(4) Christ, A.; Zentgraf, T.; Kuhl, J.; Tikhodeev, S.; Gippius, N.; Giessen, H. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 70, 125113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.125113
(5) Gülseren, O.; Ercolessi, F.; Tosatti, E. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 51, 7377. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.7377
(6) Lai, S.; Guo, J.; Petrova, V.; Ramanath, G.; Allen, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 99. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.99
(7) Alexandrov, A. S.; Kabanov, V. V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 076601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.076601
(8) Zhao, J.W.;Wang, F. Y.; Jiang, L. Y.; Yin, X.; Liu, Y. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 1835. [赵健伟, 王奋英, 蒋璐芸,尹星, 刘云红. 物理化学学报, 2009, 25, 1835.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20090909
(9) Tian, M. L.;Wang, J. U.; Kurtz, J.; Mallouk, T. E.; Chan, M. H. W. Nano. Lett. 2003, 3, 919. doi: 10.1021/nl034217d
(10) Wang, J.; Tian, M.; Mallouk, T. E.; Chan, M. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 841. doi: 10.1021/jp035068q
(11) Lu, K.; Lu, L.; Suresh, S. Science 2009, 324, 349. doi: 10.1126/science.1159610
(12) Lu, L.; Sui, M.; Lu, K. Science 2000, 287, 1463. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1463
(13) Lu, L.; Shen, Y. F.; Chen, X. H.; Qian, L. H.; Lu, K. Science 2004, 304, 422. doi: 10.1126/science.1092905
(14) Lu, L.; Chen, X.; Huang, X.; Lu, K. Science 2009, 323, 607. doi: 10.1126/science.1167641
(15) Zhong, S.; Koch, T.;Wang, M.; Scherer, T.;Walheim, S.; Hahn, H.; Schimmel, T. Small 2009, 5, 2265. doi: 10.1002/smll.v5:20
(16) Marszalek, P. E.; Greenleaf,W. J.; Li, H.; Oberhauser, A. F.; Fernandez, J. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000, 97, 6282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.12.6282
(17) Wu, B.; Heidelberg, A.; Boland, J. J. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 525. doi: 10.1038/nmat1403
(18) Greer, J. R.; Oliver,W. C.; Nix,W. D. Acta Mater. 2005, 53, 1821. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031
(19) Frøseth, A.; Van Swygenhoven, H.; Derlet, P. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 2259. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.017
(20) Frøseth, A.; Derlet, P.; Van Swygenhoven, H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 5863. doi: 10.1063/1.1835531
(21) Yang, Z. Y.; Lu, Z. X.; Zhao, Y. P. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 023537. doi: 10.1063/1.3186619
(22) Yang, Z. Y.; Lu, Z. X.; Zhao, Y. P. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2009, 46, 142. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.02.015
(23) Frøseth, A.; Derlet, P.; Van Swygenhoven, H. Scripta. Mater. 2006, 54, 477.
(24) Yamakov, V.;Wolf, D.; Phillpot, S.; Gleiter, H. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 4135. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00232-5
(25) Jin, Z. H.; Gumbsch, P.; Ma, E.; Albe, K.; Lu, K.; Hahn, H.; Gleiter, H. Scripta. Mater. 2006, 54, 1163. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.072
(26) Cao, A.;Wei, Y. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 214108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.214108
(27) Cao, A.;Wei, Y. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 083511. doi: 10.1063/1.2794884
(28) Afanasyev, K. A.; Sansoz, F. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 2056. doi: 10.1021/nl070959l
(29) Zhang, Y. F.; Huang, H. C. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 34. doi: 10.1007/s11671-008-9198-1
(30) Zhang, J.; Xu, F.; Yan, Y.; Sun, T. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 684. doi: 10.1007/s11434-012-5575-3
(31) Yuan, L.; Jing, P.; Liu, Y. H.; Xu, Z. H.; Shan, D. B.; Guo, B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 63, 1. [袁林, 敬鹏, 刘艳华,徐振海, 单德彬, 郭斌. 物理化学学报, 2014, 63, 1.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201311263
(32) Gao, Y.; Fu, Y.; Sun,W. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012, 55, 322. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.11.005
(33) Hoover,W. G. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
(34) Nosé, S. J. Chem. Phys 1984, 81, 511. doi: 10.1063/1.447334
(35) Daw, M. S.; Baskes, M. I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 50, 1285. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1285
(36) Zhao, J.W.; Yin, X.; Liang, S.; Liu, Y. H.;Wang, D. X.; Deng, S. Y.; Hou, J. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2008, 24, 367. doi: 10.1016/S1005-9040(08)60077-X
(37) Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.;Wang, F. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 115417. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.115417
(38) Wang, D.; Zhao, J.; Hu, S.; Yin, X.; Liang, S.; Liu, Y.; Deng, S. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1208. doi: 10.1021/nl0629512
(39) Wang, F.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, T.; Zhao, J. Nanoscale Res . Lett. 2011, 6, 1.(40) Zhao, J.; Murakoshi, K.; Yin, X.; Kiguchi, M.; Guo, Y.;Wang, N.; Liang, S.; Liu, H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 20088. doi: 10.1021/jp8055448
(41) Wang, F.; Sun,W.;Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Kiguchi, M.; Sun, C. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1.(42) Cao, A.;Wei, Y.; Mao, S. X. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 151909. doi: 10.1063/1.2721367
(43) Deng, C.; Sansoz, F. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 155430. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.155430
(44) Wang, J.; Li, N.; Anderoglu, O.; Zhang, X.; Misra, A.; Huang, J.; Hirth, J. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 2262. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.013
(45) Wang, Y. D.; Liu,W.; Lu, L.; Ren, Y.; Nie, Z. H.; Almer, J.; Cheng, S.; Shen, Y. F.; Zuo, L.; Liaw, P. K. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2010, 12, 906. doi: 10.1002/adem.201000123
(46) Li, X.;Wei, Y.; Lu, L.; Lu, K.; Gao, H. Nature 2010, 464, 877. doi: 10.1038/nature08929
(47) Deng, C.; Sansoz, F. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 091914. doi: 10.1063/1.3222936
(48) Wei, Y. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2011, 528, 1558. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.072
(49) Cao, A.; Ma, E. Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 4816. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.044
(50) Gao, Y.;Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Sun, C.;Wang, F. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2011, 50, 3032. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.05.023
(51) You, Z.; Lu, L.; Lu, K. Scripta. Mater. 2010, 62, 415. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.002

[1]	杨世杰, 徐向群, 程新兵, 王鑫萌, 陈金秀, 肖也, 袁洪, 刘鹤, 陈爱兵, 朱万诚, 黄佳琦, 张强. 柱状金属锂沉积物：电解液添加剂的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2007058 -0 .
[2]	李凯旋, 张泰隆, 李会增, 李明珠, 宋延林. 纳米粒子的精准组装[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(9): 1911057 -0 .
[3]	张涛,仇运广,罗启超,程曦,赵丽芬,严昕,彭浡,蒋华良,阳怀宇. 钙离子和镁离子浓度变化对磷脂酰乙醇胺-磷脂酰甘油双分子层膜的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 840 -849 .
[4]	许谢君,肖兴庆,徐首红,刘洪来. 亮氨酸拉链型脂肽对脂质体温敏性调节的分子模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 598 -606 .
[5]	吕康杰,彭燕秋,肖丽,陆君涛,庄林. 醇/水混合溶剂中碱性聚合物电解质独特的溶解行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 378 -384 .
[6]	杨化超,薄拯,帅骁睿,严建华,岑可法. 润湿特性对超级电容器储能动力学的影响机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(2): 200 -207 .
[7]	陈熙,张胜利. 基于3d元素掺杂的石墨二炔分子传感材料性能调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(9): 1061 -1073 .
[8]	陈文琼,关永吉,张晓萍,邓友全. 分子动力学模拟研究外电场对咪唑类离子液体振动谱的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 912 -919 .
[9]	刘夫锋,范玉波,刘珍,白姝. Z_Aβ3和A_β16-40亲和作用的分子机理解析[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1905 -1914 .
[10]	汪秀秀,赵健伟,余刚. 孔洞和孪晶界对银纳米线形变行为联合影响的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1773 -1780 .
[11]	王子民,郑默,谢勇冰,李晓霞,曾鸣,曹宏斌,郭力. 基于ReaxFF力场的对硝基苯酚臭氧氧化分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1399 -1410 .
[12]	曹了然,张春煜,张鼎林,楚慧郢,张跃斌,李国辉. 分子动力学模拟技术在生物分子研究中的进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1354 -1365 .
[13]	陈芳,刘圆圆,王建龙,苏宁宁,李丽洁,陈红春. 混合溶剂对β-HMX结晶形貌影响的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1140 -1148 .
[14]	陈贻建,周洪涛,葛际江,徐桂英. 双链阴离子表面活性剂1-烷基-癸基磺酸钠在气/液界面聚集行为:分子动力学模拟研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1214 -1222 .
[15]	刘青康,宋文平,黄其涛,张广玉,侯珍秀. 热辅助存储磁盘硅掺杂非晶碳薄膜氧化的ReaxFF反应力场分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(12): 2472 -2479 .