点缺陷石墨烯的电导

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810040

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为纳米材料中最有前途的的材料之一，石墨烯由于其超高的电导率、优异的热稳定性和机械强度受到了研究者的广泛关注。本文通过非平衡格林函数法结合密度泛函理论计算了石墨烯点缺陷(包括Stone-Waals，反Stone-Waals，单空位和双空位)及其浓度对石墨烯电输运性质的影响。石墨烯的电导在很大程度上依赖于点缺陷的类型及浓度。低浓度的Stone-Waals和反Stone-Waals缺陷不会显著地降低石墨烯的电输运，而双空位可使电导降低约50%左右。石墨烯中明显的电输运行为变化是由带缺陷石墨烯的能带结构决定的——由于点缺陷破坏了石墨烯蜂窝状晶格的对称性，会在费米能级附近引入局域态，进而导致狄拉克点处有能带劈裂。高缺陷浓度的双空位会在费米能级附近引入更多的平带以及在缺陷处更多的局域态，因此可能对载流子进行一定的散射，降低石墨烯的电导。此外，局部电荷密度表现出增强的局域性，阻碍了载流子的运动。石墨烯电导随着缺陷浓度和能带劈裂的增加呈指数下降。这些理论结果为研究真实单层石墨烯的电输运特性提供了重要的理解，并将有助于实验上控制石墨烯基器件的性能。

10.3866/PKU.WHXB201809013.F009

关键词: 墨烯, 点缺陷, 电子输运, 电导, 能带劈裂

Abstract:

Graphene is one of the most promising materials in nanotechnology and has attracted worldwide attention and research interest owing to its high electrical conductivity, good thermal stability, and excellent mechanical strength. Perfect graphene samples exhibit outstanding electrical and mechanical properties. However, point defects are commonly observed during fabrication which deteriorate the performance of graphene based-devices. The transport properties of graphene with point defects essentially depend on the imperfection of the hexagonal carbon atom network and the scattering of carriers by localized states. Furthermore, an in-depth understanding of the effect of specific point defects on the electronic and transport properties of graphene is crucial for specific applications. In this work, we employed density functional theory calculations and the non-equilibrium Green's function method to systematically elucidate the effects of various point defects on the electrical transport properties of graphene, including Stone-Waals and inverse Stone-Waals defects; and single and double vacancies. The electrical conductance highly depends on the type and concentration of point defects in graphene. Low concentrations of Stone-Waals, inverse Stone-Waals, and single-vacancy defects do not noticeably degrade electron transport. In comparison, DV585 induces a moderate reduction of 25%–34%, and DV55577 and DV5555-6-7777 induce significant suppression of 51%–62% in graphene. As the defect concentration increases, the electrical conductance reduces by a factor of 2–3 compared to the case of graphene monolayers with a low concentration of point defects. These distinct electrical transport behaviors are attributed to the variation of the graphene band structure; the point defects induce localized states near the Fermi level and result in energy splitting at the Dirac point due to the breaking of the intrinsic symmetry of the graphene honeycomb lattice. Double vacancies with larger defect concentrations exhibit more flat bands near the Fermi energy and more localized states in the defective region, resulting in the presence of resonant peaks close to the Fermi energy in the local density of states. This may cause resonant scattering of the carriers and a corresponding reduction of the conductance of graphene. Moreover, the partial charge densities for double vacancies and point defects with larger concentrations exhibit enhanced localization in the defective region that hinder the charge carriers. The electrical conductance shows an exponential decay as the defect concentration and energy splitting increase. These theoretical results provide important insights into the electrical transport properties of realistic graphene monolayers and will assist in the fabrication of high-performance graphene-based devices.

Key words: Graphene, Point defect, Electron transport, Electrical conductance, Energy splitting

MSC2000:

O649

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

刘南舒,周思,赵纪军. 点缺陷石墨烯的电导[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(10): 1142-1149.

Nanshu LIU,Si ZHOU,Jijun ZHAO. Electrical Conductance of Graphene with Point Defects[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(10): 1142-1149.

图/表 7

Fig 1

Fig 2

Table 1

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

参考文献 46

1	Novoselov K. S. ; Geim A. K. ; Morozov S. V. ; Jiang D. ; Zhang Y. ; Dubonos S. V. ; Grigorieva I. V. ; Firsov A. A. Science 2004, 306, 666. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896
2	Geim A. K. ; Novoselov K. S. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183. doi: 10.1038/nmat1849
3	Yi M. ; Shen Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 11700. doi: 10.1039/C5TA00252D
4	Muñoz B. R. ; Gómez-aleixandre C. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2013, 19, 297. doi: 10.1002/cvde.201300051
5	Zhang Y. ; Zhang L. ; Zhou C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2329. doi: 10.1021/ar300203n
6	Park B. J. ; Mitchel W. C. ; Grazulis L. ; Smith H. E. ; Eyink K. G. ; Boeckl J. J. ; Tomich D. H. ; Pacley S. D. ; Hoelscher J. E. Adv. Mater. 2010, 45433, 4140. doi: 10.1002/adma.201000756a
7	Ugeda M. M. ; Torre F. ; Brihuega I. ; Pou P. ; Martinez-Galera A. J. ; Perez R. ; Gomez-Rodriguez J. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 116803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.116803
8	Banhart F. ; Kotakoski J. ; Krasheninnikov A. V. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 26. doi: 10.1021/nn102598m
9	Kotakoski J. ; Mangler C. ; Meyer J. C. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 536. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4991
10	Robertson A. W. ; Allen C. S. ; Wu Y. A. ; He K. ; Olivier J. ; Neethling J. ; Kirkland A. I. ; Warner J. H. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1144. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2141
11	Ugeda M. M. ; Brihuega I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 96804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.096804
12	Stone A. J. ; Wales D. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 128, 501. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614[86]80661-3
13	Chen J. H. ; Li L. ; Cullen W. G. ; Williams E. D. ; Fuhrer M. S. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 535. doi: 10.1038/nphys1962
14	Barreiro A. ; Lazzeri M. ; Moser J. ; Mauri F. ; Bachtold A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 076601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.076601
15	Meyer J. C. ; Kisielowski C. ; Erni R. ; Rossell M. D. ; Crommie M. F. ; Zettl A. Nano Lett. 2008, 12, 3582. doi: 10.1021/nl801386m
16	Kotakoski J. ; Krasheninnikov A. V. ; Kaiser U. ; Meyer J. C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 105505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.105505
17	Lahiri J. ; Lin Y. ; Bozkurt P. ; Oleynik I. I. ; Batzill M. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 326. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.53
18	Blanc N. ; Jean F. ; Krasheninnikov A. V ; Renaud G. ; Coraux J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 085501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.085501
19	Robertson A. W. ; Montanari B. ; He K. ; Allen C. S. ; Wu Y. A. ; Harrison N. M. ; Kirkland A. I. ; Warner J. H. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4495. doi: 10.1021/nn401113r
20	Tan Y. W. ; Zhang Y. ; Bolotin K. ; Zhao Y. ; Adam S. ; Hwang E. H. ; Sarma S. D. ; Stormer H. L. ; Kim P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 246803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246803
21	Moktadir Z. ; Hang S. ; Mizuta H. Carbon 2015, 93, 325. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.049
22	Chen J. H. ; Cullen W. G. ; Jang C. ; Fuhrer M. S. ; Williams E. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 236805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.236805
23	Cretu O. ; Krasheninnikov A. V. ; Rodríguez-Manzo J. A. ; Sun L. ; Nieminen R. M. ; Banhart F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 196102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.196102
24	Hou Z. ; Wang X. ; Ikeda T. ; Terakura K. ; Oshima M. ; Kakimoto M. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 165401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165401
25	Zaminpayma E. ; Razavi M. E. ; Nayebi P. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 414, 101. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.065
26	Pereira V. M. ; Guinea F. ; Lopes Dos Santos J. M. B. ; Peres N. M. R. ; Castro Neto A. H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 036801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.036801
27	Nanda B. R. K. ; Sherafati M. ; Popović Z. S. ; Satpathy S. New J. Phys. 2012, 14, 400. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/039501
28	Lherbier A. ; Dubois S. M. M. ; Declerck X. ; Roche S. ; Niquet Y. M. ; Charlier J. C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 046803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.046803
29	Skrypnyk Y. V. ; Loktev V. M. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 82, 085436. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.085436
30	Kolasiński K. ; Mreńca-Kolasińska A. ; Szafran B. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 115406. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.115406
31	Gorjizadeh N. ; Farajian A. A ; Kawazoe Y. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 015201. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/1/015201
32	Deretzis I. ; Fiori G. ; Iannaccone G. ; Piccitto G. ; Magna A. L. Phys. E 2012, 44, 981. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2010.06.024
33	Taluja Y. ; SanthiBhushan B. ; Yadav S. ; Srivastava A. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 98, 306. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.08.044
34	Chowdhury S. ; Jana D. ; Mookerjee A. Phys. E 2015, 74, 347. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2015.07.019
35	Jamaati M. ; Namiranian A. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2015, 101, 156. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.01.037
36	Do V. N. ; Dollfus P. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 106, 023719. doi: 10.1063/1.3176956
37	Peng X. Y. ; Ahuja R. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4464. doi: 10.1021/nl802409q
38	Appelhans D. J. ; Carr L. D. ; Lusk M. T. New J. Phys. 2010, 12, 135. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/12/125006
39	Datta S. Superlattices Microstruct. 2000, 28, 253. doi: 10.1006/spmi.2000.0920
40	Brandbyge M. ; Mozos J. L. ; Ordejón P. ; Taylor J. ; Stokbro K. Phys. Rev. B -Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2002, 65, 165401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401
41	Taylor J. ; Guo H. ; Wang J. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 245407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.245407
42	Perdew J. P. ; Burke K. ; Ernzerhof M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
43	Datta, S. Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995; pp. 88-89.
44	Li T. C. ; Lu S. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 085408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.085408
45	Carlsson J. M. ; Scheffler M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 046806. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.046806
46	Kang J. ; Bang J. ; Ryu B. ; Chang K. J. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 115453. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.115453

Point defect	c/nm^‒1)	ΔH/eV	Δ/eV	G_e·G_e0⁻¹
SW	0.29	4.33 (4.5–5.3)	0.03	0.91
	0.33	4.30	0.04	0.91
	0.39	4.34	0.05	0.79
	0.58	4.17	0.06	0.43
	0.78	4.02	0.06	0.41
inverse-SW	0.29	4.35 (5.8)	0.06	0.89
	0.33	4.38	0.07	0.82
	0.39	4.41	0.08	0.80
	0.58	4.51	0.12	0.38
	0.78	4.63	0.18	0.26
SV5-9	0.29	7.42 (7.3–7.5)	0.07	0.87
	0.33	7.46	0.07	0.86
	0.39	7.50	0.08	0.83
	0.58	7.54	0.11	0.40
	0.78	7.54	0.14	0.37
SV	0.29	7.64	0.09	0.75
	0.33	7.70	0.10	0.66
	0.39	7.80	0.11	0.61
	0.58	7.81	0.14	0.32
	0.78	7.88	0.19	0.29
DV585	0.29	6.84 (7.2–7.9)	0.18	0.74
	0.33	6.90	0.22	0.70
	0.39	6.91	0.28	0.67
	0.58	6.82	0.29	0.28
	0.78	6.75	0.27	0.21
DV555777	0.29	6.13 (6.4–7.5)	0.33	0.38
	0.33	6.21	0.37	0.38
	0.39	6.24	0.42	0.39
	0.58	6.29	0.41	0.16
	0.78	6.34	0.43	0.12
DV5555-6-7777	0.29	6.10 (7.0)	0.27	0.50
	0.33	6.16	0.31	0.45
	0.39	6.16	0.34	0.41
	0.58	5.94	0.33	0.16

[1]	安惠芳, 姜莉, 李峰, 吴平, 朱晓舒, 魏少华, 周益明. 基于水凝胶衍生的硅/碳纳米管/石墨烯纳米复合材料及储锂性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(7): 1905034 -0 .
[2]	张婷,李翠翠,王伟,郭兆琦,庞爱民,马海霞. 三维氧化铁/石墨烯的构建及其对CL-20的热分解性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905048 -0 .
[3]	陈光海,白莹,高永晟,吴锋,吴川. 全固态钠离子电池硫系化合物电解质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(5): 1905009 -0 .
[4]	徐来强,李佳阳,刘城,邹国强,侯红帅,纪效波. 无机钠离子电池固体电解质研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(5): 1905013 -0 .
[5]	朱家瑶, 董玥, 张苏, 范壮军. 炭-/石墨烯量子点在超级电容器中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1903052 -0 .
[6]	魏风,毕宏晖,焦帅,何孝军. 超级电容器用相互连接的类石墨烯纳米片[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1903043 -0 .
[7]	陈尧,陈政. 新碳源制备活性炭和石墨烯及其非等电极电容水系超级电容器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(2): 1904025 -0 .
[8]	陈召龙, 高鹏, 刘忠范. 新型石墨烯基LED器件：从生长机理到器件特性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1907004 -0 .
[9]	方佳丽, 陈新, 李唱, 吴玉莲. 原位液体室透射电镜观察金纳米棒/石墨烯复合物的形成和运动过程[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 808 -815 .
[10]	姜哲,于飞,马杰. 石墨烯基吸附剂的设计及其对水中抗生素的去除[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 709 -724 .
[11]	杨康,帅骁睿,杨化超,严建华,岑可法. 基于室温离子液体的活化石墨烯粉末超级电容储能性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 755 -765 .
[12]	彭鹏,刘洪涛,武斌,汤庆鑫,刘云圻. 氮掺杂石墨烯的p型场效应及其精细调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(11): 1282 -1290 .
[13]	熊扬恒,吴昊,高建树,陈文,张景超,岳亚楠. 参杂缺陷石墨烯的高分子复合材料导热特性分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(10): 1150 -1156 .
[14]	王可心,史刘嵘,王铭展,杨皓,刘忠范,彭海琳. 生物质羟基磷灰石作为模板制备三维石墨烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(10): 1112 -1118 .
[15]	胡奇,金传洪. 透射电子显微镜下原位观察石墨烯液体池中水的辐解和凝结[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(1): 101 -107 .