原位修饰策略实现高倍率室温固态锂电池

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202104003

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (12): 2104003.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202104003

原位修饰策略实现高倍率室温固态锂电池

赵江辉¹^,², 谢茂玲³, 张海洋², 易若玮², 胡晨吉²^,⁴, 康拓², 郑磊¹^,², 崔瑞广², 陈宏伟³, 沈炎宾¹^,²^,*(), 陈立桅²^,⁴

¹ 中国科学技术大学纳米技术与纳米仿生学院，合肥 230026
² 中国科学院苏州纳米技术与纳米仿生研究所，国际实验室卓越纳米科学中心，江苏苏州 215123
³ 华侨大学材料科学与工程学院，福建厦门 361021
⁴ 上海交通大学化学化工学院，上海 200240

收稿日期:2021-04-01 录用日期:2021-04-23 发布日期:2021-04-28
通讯作者: 沈炎宾 E-mail:ybshen2017@sinano.ac.cn
作者简介:第一联系人：
^† These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21625304);国家自然科学基金(21733012);国家自然科学基金(21772190);中国科学技术部国家重点研发计划(2016YFB0100102)

In Situ Modification Strategy for Development of Room-Temperature Solid-State Lithium Batteries with High Rate Capability

Jianghui Zhao¹^,², Maoling Xie³, Haiyang Zhang², Ruowei Yi², Chenji Hu²^,⁴, Tuo Kang², Lei Zheng¹^,², Ruiguang Cui², Hongwei Chen³, Yanbin Shen¹^,²^,*(), Liwei Chen²^,⁴

¹ School of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
² i-Lab, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
³ College of Materials Science and Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, Fujian Province, China
⁴ School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received:2021-04-01 Accepted:2021-04-23 Published:2021-04-28
Contact: Yanbin Shen E-mail:ybshen2017@sinano.ac.cn
About author:Yanbin Shen, Email: ybshen2017@sinano.ac.cn; Tel.: +86-512-62872503
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21625304);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21733012);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21772190);the Ministry of Science and Technology of China(2016YFB0100102)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

固态锂电池由于其安全特性与良好的电化学性能而备受关注。但电极内锂离子传导通道不顺畅及电极-电解质界面接触阻抗大以及界面发生副反应等问题仍然阻碍着固态电池的实际应用。本工作在电极内部及电极与Li_1.5Al_0.5Ge_1.5(PO₄)₃ (LAGP)电解质之间原位聚合碳酸亚乙烯酯固态聚合物电解质(PVC-SPE)，构建了正极内部的离子传导网络，改善了电解质-电极界面的接触，而且还有效阻止了锂负极与LAGP电解质之间的副反应。Li | LAGP | LiFePO₄固态电池具有良好的循环性能和倍率充放电性能，0.2C循环200次仍有98%的容量保持率，3C倍率放电容量是0.2C容量的72.4%。这种原位聚合制备高性能固态电池有希望成为解决界面问题与构建电极内离子传导网络的方法。

关键词: 离子网络, 界面, 原位聚合, 固态电池

Abstract:

The increasing development of society has resulted in the ever-growing demand for energy storage devices. To satisfy this demand, both energy density and safety performance of lithium batteries must be improved, which is challenging. Solid-state lithium batteries are promising in this regard because of their safe operation and high electrochemical performance. In recent years, intense effort has been devoted toward the exploration of materials with high ionic conductivity for room-temperature solid-state batteries. Among several types of solid-state electrolytes, Li_1.5Al_0.5Ge_1.5(PO₄)₃ (LAGP), an inorganic NASICON-type electrolyte, has drawn considerable attention because of its high ionic conductivity, wide electrochemical window, and environmental stability. However, the formation of lithium-ion-conducting networks within the electrode and between the electrode-LAGP interface is limited because of high interfacial resistance caused by the direct contact and volume expansion between the electrode and electrolyte. Thus, the application of LAGP in the fabrication of solid-state batteries is limited. Moreover, the occurrence of the unavoidable side reaction because of the direct contact of LAGP with the lithium metal anode shortens battery life. In addition, the rigid brittle nature of the LAGP electrolyte leads to the limits the facile fabrication of solid-state batteries. To overcome these limitations, herein, a novel strategy based on in situ polymerization of a vinylene carbonate solid polymer electrolyte (PVC-SPE) was proposed. The in situ formed PVC-SPE can effectively construct ion-conducting pathways within the cathode and on the interfaces of the LAGP electrolyte and electrodes. Furthermore, the PVC-SPE can significantly inhibit the side reaction between the lithium anode and LAGP electrolyte. The electrochemical performances of Li | LAGP | Li and Li | LAGP | Li with in situ PVC-SPE modified interface symmetrical solid-state batteries were compared. The in situ modified Li | LAGP | Li symmetrical solid-state battery exhibited stability toward plating and stripping for over 2700 h and a low overpotential (34 mV) at room temperature. Moreover, a Li | LAGP | LiFePO₄ solid-state battery exhibited a capacity retention of 94% at 0.2 C after 200 cycles with a capacity of 158 mAh·g^-1. In addition, high rate capability (72.4% capacity retention at 3 C) was achieved at room temperature. Therefore, the proposed in situ modification strategy was found to resolve the interface-related problem and facilitated the construction of the ion-conducting network within the electrode; thus, it can be a promising approach for the fabrication of high-performance solid batteries.

Key words: Ion network, Interface, In situ polymerization, Solid-state battery

MSC2000:

O646

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

赵江辉, 谢茂玲, 张海洋, 易若玮, 胡晨吉, 康拓, 郑磊, 崔瑞广, 陈宏伟, 沈炎宾, 陈立桅. 原位修饰策略实现高倍率室温固态锂电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(12): 2104003.

Jianghui Zhao, Maoling Xie, Haiyang Zhang, Ruowei Yi, Chenji Hu, Tuo Kang, Lei Zheng, Ruiguang Cui, Hongwei Chen, Yanbin Shen, Liwei Chen. In Situ Modification Strategy for Development of Room-Temperature Solid-State Lithium Batteries with High Rate Capability[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(12): 2104003.

图/表 5

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

参考文献 49

1	Goodenough J. B. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1132. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03110
2	Takada K. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 759. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.034
3	Janek J. ; Zeier W. G. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16141. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.141
4	Hu Y. S. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16042. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.42
5	Hu C. ; Shen Y. ; Shen M. ; Liu X. ; Chen H. ; Liu C. ; Kang T. ; Jin F. ; Li L. ; Li J. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 18035. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c07060
6	Jin F. ; Li J. ; Hu C. J. ; Dong H. C. ; Chen P. ; Shen Y. B. ; Chen L. W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 1399. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904085
	金锋; 李静; 胡晨吉; 董厚才; 陈鹏; 沈炎宾; 陈立桅; 物理化学学报, 2019, 35, 1399. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904085
7	Blanchard D. ; Nale A. ; Sveinbjornsson D. ; Eggenhuisen T. M. ; Verkuijlen M. H. W. ; Suwarno Vegge T. ; Kentgens A. P. M. ; De Jongh P. E. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 184. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201402538
8	Liu Q. ; Yu Q. ; Li S. ; Wang S. ; Zhang L. ; Cai B. ; Zhou D. ; Li B. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 25, 613. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.023
9	Cheng Z. J. ; Mao Y. Y. ; Dong Q. Y. ; Jin F. ; Shen Y. B. ; Chen L. W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 868.
	程振杰; 毛亚云; 董庆雨; 金锋; 沈炎宾; 陈立桅; 物理化学学报, 2019, 35, 868. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201811033
10	Augustyn V. ; McDowell M. T. ; Vojvodic A. Joule 2018, 2, 2189. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.014
11	Kerman K. ; Luntz A. ; Viswanathan V. ; Chiang Y. M. ; Chen Z. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, A1731. doi: 10.1149/2.1571707jes
12	Xu L. ; Tang S. ; Cheng Y. ; Wang K. ; Liang J. ; Liu C. ; Cao Y. C. ; Wei F. ; Mai L. Joule 2018, 2, 1991. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.009
13	Wu X. L. ; Zong J. ; Xu H. ; Wang W. ; Liu X. J. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 57346. doi: 10.1039/c6ra08048k
14	Liu Q. ; Geng Z. ; Han C. ; Fu Y. ; Li S. ; He Y. B. ; Kang F. ; Li B. J. Power Sources 2018, 389, 120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.019
15	Hu R. ; Qiu H. ; Zhang H. ; Wang P. ; Du X. ; Ma J. ; Wu T. ; Lu C. ; Zhou X. ; Cui G. Small 2020, 16, e1907163. doi: 10.1002/smll.201907163
16	Li X. ; Han X. ; Zhang H. ; Hu R. ; Du X. ; Wang P. ; Zhang B. ; Cui G. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 2020, 12, 51374. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c13520
17	Han F. ; Gao T. ; Zhu Y. ; Gaskell K. J. ; Wang C. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3473. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500180
18	Tao X. ; Liu Y. ; Liu W. ; Zhou G. ; Zhao J. ; Lin D. ; Zu C. ; Sheng O. ; Zhang W. ; Lee H. W. ; et al Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 2967. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00221
19	Chen G. H. ; Bai Y. ; Gao Y. S. ; Wu F. ; Wu C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905009.
	陈光海; 白莹; 高永晟; 吴锋; 吴川; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905009. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905009
20	Liang J. Y. ; Zeng X. X. ; Zhang X. D. ; Wang P. F. ; Ma J. Y. ; Yin Y. X. ; Wu X. W. ; Guo Y. G. ; Wan L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6767. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b03319
21	Kim D. H. ; Oh D. Y. ; Park K. H. ; Choi Y. E. ; Nam Y. J. ; Lee H. A. ; Lee S. M. ; Jung Y. S. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5, 3013. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00330
22	Fei H. F. ; Liu Y. P. ; Wei C. L. ; Zhang Y. C. ; Feng J. K. ; Chen C. Z. ; Yu H. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905015.
	费慧芳; 刘永鹏; 魏传亮; 张煜婵; 冯金奎; 陈传忠; 于慧君; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905015. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905015
23	Gong Y. ; Fu K. ; Xu S. ; Dai J. ; Hamann T. R. ; Zhang L. ; Hitz G. T. ; Fu Z. ; Ma Z. ; McOwen D. W. ; et al Mater. Today 2018, 21, 594. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.01.001
24	Wu B. ; Wang S. ; Evans W. J. ; Deng D. Z. ; Yang J. ; Xiao J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15266. doi: 10.1039/c6ta05439k
25	Xu L. Q. ; Li J. Y. ; Liu C. ; Zou G. Q. ; Hou H. S. ; Ji X. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905013.
	徐来强; 李佳阳; 刘城; 邹国强; 侯红帅; 纪效波; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905013. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905013
26	Han X. ; Gong Y. ; Fu K. ; He X. ; Hitz G. T. ; Dai J. ; Pearse A. ; Liu B. ; Wang H. ; Rubloff G. ; et al Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 572. doi: 10.1038/nmat4821
27	Dong D. ; Zhou B. ; Sun Y. ; Zhang H. ; Zhong G. ; Dong Q. ; Fu F. ; Qian H. ; Lin Z. ; Lu D. ; et al Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 2343. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05019
28	Chen L. Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 2001035.
	陈立泉; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 2001035. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202001035
29	Wei X. ; Shriver D. F. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 2307. doi: 10.1021/cm980170z
30	Zhang J. ; Yang J. ; Dong T. ; Zhang M. ; Chai J. ; Dong S. ; Wu T. ; Zhou X. ; Cui G. Small 2018, 14, 1800821. doi: 10.1002/smll.201800821
31	Chai J. ; Liu Z. ; Ma J. ; Wang J. ; Liu X. ; Liu H. ; Zhang J. ; Cui G. ; Chen L. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 2017, 4, 1600377. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600377
32	Arbi K. ; Bucheli W. ; Jiménez R. ; Sanz J. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 1477. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.11.023
33	Kotobuki M. ; Koishi M. J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2019, 7, 551. doi: 10.1080/21870764.2019.1693680
34	Smets G. ; Hayashi K. J. Polym. Sci. 1958, 29, 257. doi: 10.1002/pol.1958.1202911919
35	Chen S. ; Che H. ; Feng F. ; Liao J. ; Wang H. ; Yin Y. ; Ma Z. F. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 2019, 11, 43056. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b11259
36	Huang S. ; Cui Z. ; Qiao L. ; Xu G. ; Zhang J. ; Tang K. ; Liu X. ; Wang Q. ; Zhou X. ; Zhang B. ; et al Electrochim. Acta 2019, 299, 820. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.039
37	Yi J. ; Liu Y. ; Qiao Y. ; He P. ; Zhou H. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1378. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00292
38	Hiller M. M. ; Joost M. ; Gores H. J. ; Passerini S. ; Wiemhöfer H. D. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 114, 21. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.138
39	Liu Y. ; Li C. ; Li B. ; Song H. ; Cheng Z. ; Chen M. ; He P. ; Zhou H. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702374. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702374
40	Tsai C. L. ; Roddatis V. ; Chandran C. V. ; Ma Q. ; Uhlenbruck S. ; Bram M. ; Heitjans P. ; Guillon O. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10617. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00831
41	Chung H. ; Kang B. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 8611. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02301
42	Guo J. ; Wen Z. ; Wu M. ; Jin J. ; Liu Y. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 51, 59. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.12.008
43	Fan L. ; Wei S. ; Li S. ; Li Q. ; Lu Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702657. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702657
44	Huang Q. ; Turcheniuk K. ; Ren X. ; Magasinski A. ; Song A. Y. ; Xiao Y. ; Kim D. ; Yushin G. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1343. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0472-7
45	Xia S. ; Lopez J. ; Liang C. ; Zhang Z. ; Bao Z. ; Cui Y. ; Liu W. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1802353. doi: 10.1002/advs.201802353
46	Jing B. ; Evans C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 18932. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09811
47	Liu Q. ; Zhou D. ; Shanmukaraj D. ; Li P. ; Kang F. ; Li B. ; Armand M. ; Wang G. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 1456. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00542
48	Zhang H. ; Zhang J. ; Ma J. ; Xu G. ; Dong T. ; Cui G. Electrochem. Ener. Rev. 2019, 2, 128. doi: 10.1007/s41918-018-00027-x
49	Zhou J. ; Qian T. ; Liu J. ; Wang M. ; Zhang L. ; Yan C. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3066. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00450

[1]	宋雨珂, 谢文富, 邵明飞. 一体化电极电催化二氧化碳还原研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2101028 -0 .
[2]	朱思颖, 李辉阳, 胡忠利, 张桥保, 赵金保, 张力. 锂离子电池氧化亚硅负极结构优化和界面改性研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2103052 -0 .
[3]	孙轲, 赵永青, 殷杰, 靳晶, 刘翰文, 席聘贤. 有机配体表面改性NiCo₂O₄纳米线用于水全分解[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2107005 -0 .
[4]	殷宇豪, 沈阳, 王虎, 陈肖, 邵林, 华文宇, 王娟, 崔义. TiN/Hf_xZr_1-xO₂/TiN铁电电容器的原位生长与表征[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2006016 -0 .
[5]	俞宏伟, 李实, 李金龙, 朱韶华, 孙成珍. 气驱油油气混相过程的界面传质特性及其分子机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2006061 -0 .
[6]	刘苗苗, 王文娟, 郝秀萍, 董晓燕. Aβ40和hIAPP在溶液和表面的成核与交叉成核聚集行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 2002024 -0 .
[7]	常明凯, 胡娜, 李遥, 鲜东帆, 周万强, 王静一, 时燕琳, 刘春立. Eu(Ⅲ)在蒙脱石上的吸附及碳酸根和磷酸根对其吸附的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 2003031 -0 .
[8]	宋厚甫, 康飞宇. 石墨烯导热研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(1): 2101013 -0 .
[9]	张鹏, 王继全, 李源, 姜丽莎, 王壮壮, 张高科. 非贵金属助剂Ni₂P修饰类石墨碳氮化物光催化剂增强可见光光催化产氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009102 -0 .
[10]	王艳秋, 钟子欣, 刘唐康, 刘国亮, 洪昕林. Cu@UiO-66衍生的Cu⁺-ZrO₂界面位点用于高效催化CO₂加氢制甲醇[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(5): 2007089 -0 .
[11]	王云飞, 刘建华, 于美, 钟锦岩, 周琪森, 邱俊明, 张晓亮. SnO₂表面卤化提高钙钛矿太阳能电池光伏性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 2006030 -0 .
[12]	朱高龙, 赵辰孜, 袁洪, 南皓雄, 赵铂琛, 侯立鹏, 何传新, 刘全兵, 黄佳琦. 基于局部高盐界面润湿策略构筑的固态金属锂软包电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2005003 -0 .
[13]	吴晨, 周颖, 朱晓龙, 詹忞之, 杨汉西, 钱江锋. 锂金属电池用高浓度电解液体系研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2008044 -0 .
[14]	关俊, 李念武, 于乐. 人工界面层在金属锂负极中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2009011 -0 .
[15]	何一涛, 丁飞, 林立, 王志红, 吕喆, 张耀辉. 电极界面浓差极化对锂金属沉积的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(2): 2009001 -0 .

原位修饰策略实现高倍率室温固态锂电池

In Situ Modification Strategy for Development of Room-Temperature Solid-State Lithium Batteries with High Rate Capability

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 49

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10