C2-C2直链烯烃在HY 和H-ZSM-5分子筛上的吸附

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100839

物理化学学报 >> 2010, Vol. 26 >> Issue (09): 2503-2509.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100839

C₂-C₂直链烯烃在HY 和H-ZSM-5分子筛上的吸附

郭玉华¹, 蒲敏², 陈标华²

1. 湖州师范学院,浙江湖州 313000;
2. 北京化工大学化工资源有效利用国家重点实验室,北京 100029

收稿日期:2010-02-02 修回日期:2010-05-09 发布日期:2010-09-02
通讯作者: 郭玉华 E-mail:guoyuhua@hutc.zj.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(973) (2004CB217804)资助

Adsorption of Linear C₂-C₅ Olefins on HYand H-ZSM-5 Zeolites

GUO Yu-Hua¹, PU Min², CHEN Biao-Hua²

1. Huzhou Teachers College, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, P. R. China

Received:2010-02-02 Revised:2010-05-09 Published:2010-09-02
Contact: GUO Yu-Hua E-mail:guoyuhua@hutc.zj.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Key Basic Research Programof China (973) (2004CB217804).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用ONIOM(B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p):UFF)分层计算方法, 研究了C₂-C₅直链烯烃在HY 和H-ZSM-5 分子筛上的吸附性质. 理论计算结果表明: 烯烃与分子筛的Br?nsted 酸性位相互作用形成π配位超分子复合物; 随着碳链的增长, 烯烃的吸附能增加, 增加量近似为一个常数(HY 分子筛: 约12 kJ·mol^-1; H-ZSM-5 分子筛: 约 25 kJ·mol^-1), 与烷烃在分子筛上的吸附具有相同的规律. 双键位置对烯烃的吸附能影响很大, 2位烯烃的吸附能要远大于1 位烯烃的吸附能. 不同类型分子筛对烯烃的吸附性能也有很大差别, 由于局域效应的影响, 小孔径 H-ZSM-5分子筛上的吸附能大于大孔径的HY分子筛,而且碳链越长,这种差别越大.从微观结构上看,吸附的烯烃与H-ZSM-5分子筛酸性位的距离要远大于它们与HY分子筛酸性位的距离, 这是由于不同类型分子筛的微孔结构产生的范德华作用是不同的,这种作用随着孔径的减小而增强.前线轨道分析表明, 对于小分子烯烃,大孔径 HY分子筛对其催化活性相近,而小孔径H-ZSM-5分子筛随着烯烃碳原子数的增加催化活性有减弱的趋势.

关键词: 吸附, 烯烃, 分子筛, ONIOM

Abstract:

The adsorption properties of linear C₂-C₅ olefins on HY and H-ZSM-5 zeolites were studied by the ONIOM(B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p):UFF)method. The results indicate that microcosmic interactions of the olefin molecules with the Br?nsted acid sites of the zeolites lead to the formation of π-complexes. The adsorption energies of olefins on zeolites increase with an increase in the number of carbon atoms, and the amount of increase is approximately constant (HY zeolites: ca 12 kJ·mol^-1; H-ZSM-5 zeolites: ca 25 kJ·mol^-1), which agrees well with the adsorption properties of alkanes on zeolites. The position of the double bond has a fairly large effect on the adsorption energies of olefins. The adsorption energies of 2-olefins are much higher than those of 1-olefins. The adsorption energies of olefins on the different types of zeolites also show a significant difference. The adsorption energies of olefins on small pore H-ZSM-5 zeolites are much larger than those on large pore HY zeolites. Furthermore, the confinement effect in the different types of zeolites is more obvious when the number of carbon atoms increase. From the microstructure, the distance between the adsorbent molecule and the acidic proton in the H-ZSM-5 zeolite is much bigger than that between the adsorbent molecule and the acidic proton in the HY zeolite. These are mainly attributed to differences in the van der Waals interactions for the different types of zeolites, and the small pore zeolites have much stronger van der Waals interactions. Frontier orbital calculations indicate that the catalytic activity of the large pore HY zeolite is similar for small olefins while the catalytic activity of the small pore H-ZSM-5 zeolite decreases slightly with increasing carbon number.

Key words: Adsorption, Olefin, Zeolite, ONIOM

MSC2000:

O641

郭玉华, 蒲敏, 陈标华. C₂-C₂直链烯烃在HY 和H-ZSM-5分子筛上的吸附[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(09): 2503-2509.

GUO Yu-Hua, PU Min, CHEN Biao-Hua. Adsorption of Linear C₂-C₅ Olefins on HYand H-ZSM-5 Zeolites[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2010, 26(09): 2503-2509.

参考文献

1. Derouane, E. G.; Andre, J. M.; Lucas, A. A. J. Catal., 1988, 110: 58
2. Madeira, F. F.; Gnep, N. S.; Magnoux, P.; Maury, S.; Cadran, N. Appl. Catal. A, 2009, 367: 39
3. Derouane, E. G.; Chang, C. D. Microporous Mesoporous Mat., 2000, 35-36: 425
4. Derouane, E. G. J. Mol. Catal. A, 1998, 134: 29
5. Kontnik-Matecka, B.; Górska, M.; Eysymontt, J.; Sa覥ek, A. J. Mol. Struct., 1982, 80: 199
6. White, J. L.; Beck, L. W.; Haw, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114: 6182
7. Kondo, J. N.; Domen, K. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2003, 199: 27
8. Cant, N. W.; Hall, W. K. J. Catal., 1972, 25: 161
9. Yoda, E.; Kondo, J. N.; Domen, K. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109: 1464
10. Gee, J. C.; Prampin, D. S. Appl. Catal. A, 2009, 360: 71
11. Spoto, G.; Bordiga, S.; Ricchiardi, G.; Scarano, D.; Zecchina, A.; Borello, E. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1994, 90: 2827
12. Barrer, R. M. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1966, 21: 415
13. Maesen, T. L. M.; Beerdsen, E.; Calero, S.; Dubbeldam, D.; Smit,B. J. Catal., 2006, 237: 278
14. Webster, C. E.; Cottone III, A.; Drago, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121: 12127
15. M?ller, A.; Guimaraes, A. P.; Gl?ser, R.; Staudt, R. Microporous Mesoporous Mat., 2009, 125: 23
16. Frash, M. V.; Kazansky, V. B.; Rigby, A. M.; van Santen, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102: 2232
17. Rigby, A. M.; Frash, M. V. J. Mol. Catal. A, 1997, 126: 61
18. Zheng, X.; Blowers, P. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2006, 246: 1
19. Nieminen, V.; Sierka, M.; Murzin, D. Y.; Sauer J. J. Catal., 2005, 231: 393
20. Khaliullin, R. Z.; Bell, A. T.; Kazansky, V. B. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105: 10454
21. Banach, E.; Kozyra, P.; Rejmak, P.; Broc覥awik, E.; Datka, J. Catal. Today, 2008, 137: 493
22. Kasuriya, S.; Namuangruk, S.; Treesukol, P., Tirtowidjojo, M.; Limtrakul, J. J. Catal., 2003, 219: 320
23. Maihom, T.; Boekfa, B.; Sirijaraensre, J.; Nanok, T.; Probst, M.; Limtrakul, J. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 6654
24. Kalita, B.; Deka, R. C. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 16070
25. Namuangruk, S.; Khongpracha, P.; Pantu, P.; Limtrakul, J. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110: 25950
26. Clark, L. A.; Sierka, M.; Sauer, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125: 2136
27. Boronat, M.; Viruela, P. M.; Corma, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126: 3300
28. Zheng, A. M.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Zhang, M. J.; Su, Y. C.; Yue, Y.; Ye, C. H.; Deng, F. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109: 24273
29. Zheng, A. M.; Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Yue, Y.; Ye, C. H.; Lu, X.; Deng, F. Chem. Commun., 2005: 2474
30. Zheng, A. M.; Wang, L.; Chen, L.; Yue, Y.; Ye, C. H.; Lu, X.; Deng, F. ChemPhysChem, 2007, 8: 231
31. Wang, S. P.; Wang, Y. L.; Cao, L.; Xing, S. Y.; Zhou, D. H. Chin. J. Catal., 2009, 30: 305 [王善鹏,王伊蕾, 曹亮,邢双英,周丹红.催化学报, 2009, 30: 305]
32. Olson, D. H.; Dempsey, E. J. Catal., 1969, 13: 221
33. van Koningsveld, H.; van Bekkum, H.; Jansen, J. C. Acta Crystallogr. B, 1987, 43: 127
34. Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989: 1-325
35. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A, 1988, 38: 3098
36. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37: 785
37. Pantu, P.; Boekfa, B.; Limtrakul, J. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2007, 277: 171
38. Bobuatong, K.; Limtrakul, J. Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 253: 49
39. Rungsirisakun, R.; Jansang, B.; Pantu, P.; Limtrakul, J. J. Mol. Struct., 2005, 733: 239
40. Namuangruk, S.; Tantanak, D.; Limtrakul, J. J. Mol. Catal., 2006, 256: 113
41. Froese, R. D. J.; Morokuma, K. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1999, 305: 419
42. Froese, R. D. J.; Morokuma, K. J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103: 4580
43. Vreven, T.; Morokuma, K. J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 111: 8799
44. Vreven, T.; Morokuma, K. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 106: 6167
45. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; et al. Gaussian 03. Revision B.04. Pittsburgh, PA: Gaussian Inc., 2003
46. Kondo, J. N.; Domen, K.; Wakabayashi, F. Microporous Mesoporous Mat., 1998, 21: 429
47. Mortier,W. J. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1988, 37: 253
48. Datka, J.; Boczar, M. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 1993, 51: 161
49. Benco, L.; Hafner, J.; Hutschka, F.; Toulhoat, H. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107: 9756
50. van Bokhoven, J. A.; Williams, B. A.; Ji, W.; Koningsberger, D. C.; Kung, H. H.; Miller, J. T. J. Catal., 2004, 224: 50
51. Babitz, S. M.; Williams, B. A.; Miller, J. T.; Snurr, R. Q.; Haag, W. O.; Kung, H. H. Appl. Catal. A, 1999, 179: 71

[1]	张建, 王亮, 伍芷毅, 王成涛, 苏泽瑞, 肖丰收. 理性设计核-壳Rh-石催化材料用于二烯烃选择加氢反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(9): 1912001 -0 .
[2]	王文元, 张杰夫, 李喆, 邵翔. 单原子分散的Au/Cu(111)表面合金的表面结构与吸附性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(8): 1911035 -0 .
[3]	李诗涵,赵侦超,李世坤,邢友东,张维萍. DFT计算结合固体NMR研究富铝SSZ-13的铝分布和Brønsted酸性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1903021 -0 .
[4]	刘小龙, 王强, 王超, 徐君, 邓风. Silicalite-1分子筛氢键诱导晶化机制的固体核磁共振研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1905035 -0 .
[5]	孙冠卿, 易宗霖, 魏涛. 胶体颗粒稳定的界面及胶体颗粒在界面的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1910005 -0 .
[6]	王百先,王琪菲,邸建城,于吉红. 具有抗生物污染活性的分子筛膜用于高效油水分离[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1906044 -0 .
[7]	母晓玥,李路. 室温光驱动甲烷活化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 968 -976 .
[8]	韩萌茹,周亚男,周旋,储伟. 通过g-C₃N₄担载MNi₁₂ (Fe, Co, Cu, Zn)纳米团簇调节甲烷化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 850 -857 .
[9]	姜哲,于飞,马杰. 石墨烯基吸附剂的设计及其对水中抗生素的去除[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 709 -724 .
[10]	何妍,李豪,周莉,徐婷,彭昌军,刘洪来. 新型芳香三嗪超交联多孔聚合物去除水溶液中甲基橙[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(3): 299 -306 .
[11]	谷雨星,杨娟,汪的华. CO₂熔盐电化学转化碳材料的电化学特性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(2): 208 -214 .
[12]	翟岩亮, 张少龙, 张络明, 尚蕴山, 王文轩, 宋宇, 姜彩彤, 巩雁军. 不同B，Al分布对ZSM-5分子筛的甲醇制丙烯反应性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(11): 1248 -1258 .
[13]	徐禄禄,赵侦超,赵蓉蓉,喻瑞,张维萍. 镁改性对HZSM-5分子筛催化乙烯制丙烯的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(1): 92 -100 .
[14]	段园,陈明树,万惠霖. O₂和CO在Ni(111)表面的吸附活化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(12): 1358 -1365 .
[15]	刘强,韩永,曹云君,李小宝,黄武根,余毅,杨帆,包信和,李毅敏,刘志. 利用原位APXPS与STM研究H₂在ZnO(10${\rm{\bar 1}}$0)表面的活化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(12): 1366 -1372 .

C₂-C₂直链烯烃在HY 和H-ZSM-5分子筛上的吸附

Adsorption of Linear C₂-C₅ Olefins on HYand H-ZSM-5 Zeolites

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0