从能量和信息理论视角理解单取代烷烃的异构化

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201708302

Abstract

Abstract:

A unified explanation for the relative stability of linear and branched alkanes is still lacking, and research in this direction is ongoing. Unlike the conventional orbital-based description, we have employed the density functional theory (DFT) based on the total energy and its components as well as a newly proposed energy partitioning scheme [Liu, S. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 244103]. Taking monosubstituted hydrocarbons C_nH_2n+1―R (n = 3, 4, 5, 6; R = OH, OCH₃, NH₂, NO₂, F, Cl, CN, CHO) as examples, we have investigated the molecular origin and nature within the framework of the DFT. Our computational results revealed that no such a single energy component that dictates the transformation of the mono-substituted alkane derivatives. By the binary fit of the electrostatic potential and steric hindrance from the new energy decomposition scheme, we unraveled that isomerization is mainly governed by the electrostatic potential, while the steric effect has a minor influence. Moreover, we established a linear relationship between the Shannon entropy difference and the Fisher information difference, which is accordance with previous findings. Further, there was no linear relationship between E_e and the Fisher information or Shannon entropy.

Key words: Molecular stability, Steric hindrance, Density functional theory, Energy component

MSC2000:

O641

Aiguo ZHONG,Rongrong LI,Qin HONG,Jie ZHANG,Dan CHEN. Understanding the Isomerization of Monosubstituted Alkanes from Energetic and Information-Theoretic Perspectives[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(3): 303-313.

References

1	Olah G. A. ; Molnur A. Hydrocarbon Chemistry New York: Wiley, 1995.
2	Miao J. ; Hua S. ; Li S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2012, 541, 7.
3	Wodrich M. D. ; Wannere C. S. ; Mo Y. ; Jarowski P. D. ; Houk K. N. ; Schleyer P. V. R. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13 (27), 7731.
4	Allen T. L. J.Chem. Phys. 1959, 31, 1039.
5	Gronert S. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15 (21), 5372.
6	Pitzer K. S. ; Catalano E. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 4844.
7	Ma J. ; Inagaki S. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1193.
8	Ito K. J.Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 2430.
9	Badenhoop J. K. ; Weinhold F. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107 (14), 5406.
10	Kemnitz C. R. ; Mackey J. L. ; Loewen M. J. ; Hargrove J. L. ; Lewis J. L. ; Hawkins W. E. ; Nielsen A. F. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16 (23), 6942.
11	Weizs?cker C. F. V. Z.Phys. 1935, 96, 431.
12	Liu S. B. J.Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 244103.
13	Weisskopf V. F. Science 1975, 187, 605.
14	Parr R. G. ; Yang W. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
15	Chakraborty D. ; Kar S. ; Chattaraj P. K. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 31516.
16	Liu S. B. ; Govind N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112 (29), 6690.
17	Liu S. B. ; Govind N ; Pedersen L.G. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129 (9), 094104.
18	U?ur ?. ; Vleeschouwer F. D. ; Tüzün N. ; Aviyente V. ; Geerlings P. ; Liu S. B. ; Ayers P. W. ; DeProft F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113 (30), 8704.
19	Torrent-Sucarrat M. ; Liu S. B. ; DeProft F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113 (15), 3698.
20	Liu S. B. ; Hu H. ; Pedersen L. G. J.Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 5913.
21	Tsirelson V. G. ; Stash A. I. ; Liu S. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133 (11), 114110.
22	Ess D. H. ; Liu S. B. ; DeProft F. J.Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 12952.
23	Zhao D. B. ; Rong C. Y. ; Jenkins S. ; Kirk R. S. ; Yin D. L. ; Liu S. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29 (1), 43.
23	赵东波; 荣春英; 苏曼; 苏文; 尹笃林; 刘述斌. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29 (1), 43.
24	Wang Y. J. ; Zhao D. B. ; Rong C. Y. ; Liu S. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29 (10), 2173.
24	王友娟; 赵东波; 荣春英; 刘述斌. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29 (10), 2173.
25	Zhong A. G. ; Chen D. ; Li R. R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2015, 633, 265.
26	Deb B.M ; Chattaraj P. K. Phys. Rev. A 1989, 39, 1696.
27	Shannon C. E. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379.
28	Fisher R. A. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1925, 22, 700.
29	Bader R. F. W. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theor Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
30	Zhao Y. ; Truhlar D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215.
31	Valiev M. ; Bylaska E. J. ; Govind N. ; Kowalski K. ; Straatsma T. P. ; van Dam H. J. J. ; Wang D. ; Nieplocha J. ; Apra E. ; Windus T. L. ; et al Comput.Phys. Commun. 2010, 181, 1477.
32	Becke A. D. J.Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1372.
33	Lee C. ; Yang W. ; Parr R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
34	Lu T. ; Chen F. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33 (5), 580.
35	Lu, T. Multiwfn, Version 3. 3; A Multifunctional Wavefunction Analyzer, 2016, http://multiwfn.codeplex.com (accessed Sep 18, 2016).
36	Grimme S. ; Ehrlich S. ; Goerigk L. J.Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456.
37	Becke A. D. ; Johnson E. R. J.Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 154104.
38	He?elmann A. J. Chem. Phys. 2009, 130 (8), 084104.
39	Liu S. B. J.Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 191107.
40	Rong C. Y. ; Lu T. ; Liu S. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140 (2), 024109.

[1]	Zhichao Huang,Yazhong Dai,Xiaojie Wen,Dan Liu,Yuxuan Lin,Zhen Xu,Jian Pei,Kai Wu. Conformational Switching of Verdazyl Radicals on Au(111) [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(1): 1907043-0.
[2]	Dan WANG,Xunlei DING,Henglu LIAO,Jiayu DAI. Methane Activation on (Au/Ag)₁-Doped Vanadium Oxide Clusters [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 1005-1013.
[3]	Qiang CHEN,Li-Xue JIANG,Hai-Fang LI,Jiao-Jiao CHEN,Yan-Xia ZHAO,Sheng-Gui HE. Thermal Activation of Methane by Diatomic Vanadium Boride Cations [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 1014-1020.
[4]	Mengru HAN,Yanan ZHOU,Xuan ZHOU,Wei CHU. Tunable Reactivity of MNi₁₂ (M = Fe, Co, Cu, Zn) Nanoparticles Supported on Graphitic Carbon Nitride in Methanation [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(8): 850-857.
[5]	Yue ZHAO,Jiatong CUI,Jichuang HU,Jiabi MA. Reactivities of VO_1–4⁺ Toward n-C_mH_2m+2 (m = 3, 5, 7) as Functions of Oxygen Content and Carbon Chain Length [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(5): 531-538.
[6]	Martínez GONZÁLEZ Marco,Carlos CÁRDENAS,Juan I. RODRÍGUEZ,Shubin LIU,Farnaz HEIDAR-ZADEH,Ramón Alain MIRANDA-QUINTANA,Paul W. AYERS. Quantitative Electrophilicity Measures [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(6): 662-674.
[7]	Paul W. AYERS,Mel LEVY. Levy Constrained Search in Fock Space: An Alternative Approach to Noninteger Electron Number [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(6): 625-630.
[8]	Tian LU,Qinxue CHEN. Revealing Molecular Electronic Structure via Analysis of Valence Electron Density [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(5): 503-513.
[9]	Farnaz HEIDAR-ZADEH,Paul W. AYERS. Generalized Hirshfeld Partitioning with Oriented and Promoted Proatoms [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(5): 514-518.
[10]	Yueqi YIN,Mengxu JIANG,Chunguang LIU. DFT Study of POM-Supported Single Atom Catalyst (M₁/POM, M = Ni, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Au, POM = [PW₁₂O₄₀]^3-) for Activation of Nitrogen Molecules [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(3): 270-277.
[11]	Fanhua YIN,Kai TAN. Density Functional Theory Study on the Formation Mechanism of Isolated-Pentagon-Rule C₁₀₀(417)Cl₂₈ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(3): 256-262.
[12]	Robert C MORRISON. Fukui Functions for the Temporary Anion Resonance States of Be^-, Mg^-, and Ca^- [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(3): 263-269.
[13]	Xinyi WANG,Lei XIE,Yuanqi DING,Xinyi YAO,Chi ZHANG,Huihui KONG,Likun WANG,Wei XU. Interactions between Bases and Metals on Au(111) under Ultrahigh Vacuum Conditions [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(12): 1321-1333.
[14]	Chi CHEN,Xue ZHANG,Zhi-You ZHOU,Xin-Sheng ZHANG,Shi-Gang SUN. Experimental Boosting of the Oxygen Reduction Activity of an Fe/N/C Catalyst by Sulfur Doping and Density Functional Theory Calculations [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(9): 1875-1883.
[15]	Yu-Yu LIU,Jie-Wei LI,Yi-Fan BO,Lei YANG,Xiao-Fei ZHANG,Ling-Hai XIE,Ming-Dong YI,Wei HUANG. Theoretical Studies on the Structures and Opto-Electronic Properties of Fluorene-Based Strained Semiconductors [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(9): 1803-1810.

Understanding the Isomerization of Monosubstituted Alkanes from Energetic and Information-Theoretic Perspectives

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0