温度对乙醇电催化氧化的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

Abstract

Abstract:

The electrocatalytic activity of commercial Pt/C for ethanol oxidation is relatively low, and the C―C bond is difficult to break. Thus, the complete oxidation process is not easy, and the fuel utilization efficiency becomes considerably reduced. Increasing the temperature can increase the reaction rate and enhance the mass transport; therefore, a temperature-controlled electrode was used during our in situ FTIRS (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) investigation. The temperature sensor was placed at a certain distance from the surface of the electrode; thus, the surface temperature needed to be corrected. The temperature was calibrated using the "potentiometric" measurement method, which was because the potential-temperature coefficient of the redox couple is constant under certain conditions, and the electrode surface temperature was obtained by potential conversion at different temperatures during the experiment. The experimental results showed that the relationship between the heating temperature, T_h, and the surface temperature, T_S, was T_S = 0.57T_h + 7.71 (30 ℃ < T_h ≤ 50 ℃) and T_S = 0.62T_h + 5.12 (50 ℃ < T_h ≤ 80 ℃), and according to error analysis, the maximum error was 1 ℃. The temperature-controlled electrode was applied to investigate the electrooxidation of ethanol using both in situ FTIRS and cyclic voltammetry using a commercial Pt/C catalyst at different temperatures. Clearly, based on the CV curve for the oxidation of ethanol, with increasing temperature, the overall oxidation current increased, and the onset potential and peak potential both negatively shifted, indicating that thermal activation allows the oxidation reaction to proceed easier. Electrooxidation of ethanol showed two positive oxidation peaks, and the ratio of the first peak current to the second peak current was used to qualitatively evaluate the selectivity of CO₂. Compared with at 25 ℃, the first peak current increased by 30% at 65 ℃, indicating that the high temperature was conducive to C―C bond cleavage. Comparing the in situ FTIRS recorded at 50 ℃, 35 ℃, and 25 ℃, we found that the onset potential of CO₂ on the commercial Pt/C catalyst was lower by 200 mV, indicating that Pt/C can provide oxygen-containing species at lower potentials at high temperature; however, the onset potentials of CH₃CHO and CH₃COOH did not change with temperature. The CO₂ selectivity was semi-quantitatively calculated by the area of CO₂ compared with the area of CH₃COOH from the FTIRS data. It was found that CO₂ had the highest selectivity at high temperature and low potential, indicating that high temperature is conducive to complete ethanol oxidation during CO₂ formation, possibly because both the ethanol bridge adsorption pattern and adsorbed OH (OH_ad) increased with temperature, enhancing subsequent CO_ad and OH_ad oxidation reactions. The low selectivity of CO₂ at the high potential was due to the adsorption of oxygen-containing species that occupied the surface-active site, blocking the adsorption of ethanol.

Key words: Temperature controlled electrode, "Potentiometric" measurement, In situ FTIRS, Ethanol, Electrocatalysis

MSC2000:

O646

Kunfang Tu, Guang Li, Yanxia Jiang. Effect of Temperature on the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Ethanol[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2020, 36(8): 1906026.

0
/ In situ FTIRS|Ethanol|Electrocatalysis”. Please open it by linking:http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/abstract/abstract35222.shtml" name="neirong"> In situ FTIRS|Ethanol|Electrocatalysis">

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V36/I8/1906026

Figures/Tables 12

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Table 1

Fig 6

Table 2

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

References 25

1	Chen X. B. ; Li C. ; Gratzel M. ; Kostecki R. ; Mao S. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7909. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35230C
2	Antolini E. J. Power Sources 2007, 170, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.009
3	An L. ; Zhao T. S. ; Li Y. S. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev 2015, 50, 1462. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.074
4	Yajima T. ; Uchida H. ; Watanabe M. J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (8), 2654. doi: 10.1021/jp037215q
5	Ye J. Y. ; Jiang Y. X. ; Sheng T. ; Sun S. G. Nano Energy 2016, 29, 414. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.023
6	Watanabe M. ; Sato T. ; Kunimatsu K. ; Uchida H. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53 (23), 6928. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.023
7	Wang J. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 396, 33. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00355-4
8	Zhou Z. Y. ; Wang Q. ; Lin J. L. ; Tian N. ; Sun S. G. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55 (27), 7995. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.071
9	Jenkins D. M. ; Song C. Y. ; Fares S. ; Cheng H. ; Barrettino D. Sens Actu B: Chem. 2009, 137, 222. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.09.046
10	Compton R. G. ; Coles B. A. ; Marken F. Chem. Commun 1998, 2595, 2595. doi: 10.1039/A806511J
11	Yuan Q. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Zhuang J. ; Wang X. Chem. Mater 2010, 22, 2395. doi: 10.1021/cm903844t
12	Hitmi H. ; Belgsir E. M. ; Léger J. M. ; Lamy C. ; Lezna R. O. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 407. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)80080-4
13	Rao L. ; Jiang Y. X. ; Zhang B. W. ; Cai Y. R. ; Sun S. G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 13662. doi: 10.1039/C3CP55059A
14	Iwasita T. ; Pastor E. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 531. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)80097-9
15	Rasch B. ; Iwasita T. Electrochim. Acta 1990, 35, 989. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(90)90032-U
16	Colmati F. ; Tremiliosi-Filho G. ; Gonzalez E. R. ; Berná A. ; Herrero E. ; Feliu ; J M. Faraday Discuss 2008, 140, 379. doi: 10.1039/B802160K
17	Liu H. X. ; Tian N. ; Brandon M. P. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Lin J. L. ; Hardacre C. ; Lin W. F. ; Sun S. G. ACS Catal 2012, 2, 708. doi: 10.1021/cs200686a
18	Lu G. Q. ; Sun S. G. ; Cai L. R. ; Chen S. P. ; Tian Z. W. Langmuir 2000, 16, 778. doi: 10.1021/la990282k
19	Tian N. ; Xiao J. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Liu H. X. ; Xu B. B. ; Sun S. G. Faraday Discuss. 2013, 162, 77. doi: 10.1039/C3FD20146E
20	Ghumman A. ; Pickup P. G. J. Power Sources 2008, 179, 280. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.071
21	Rao V. ; Cremers C. ; Stimming U. J. Eletrochem. Soc 2007, 154, 1138. doi: 10.1149/1.2777108
22	Camara G.A. ; Iwasita T. J. Eletrochem. Soc. 2005, 578, 315. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.01.013
23	Severson M. W. ; Stuhlmann C. ; Villegas I. ; Weaver M. J. J. Chem Phys. 1995, 103, 9832. doi: 10.1063/1.469950
24	Zhang B. W. ; Sheng T. ; Wang Y. X. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (1), 892. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03021
25	Wang H. F ; Liu Z. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130 (33), 10996. doi: 10.1021/ja801648h

T/℃	j₁/(A?mg^?1)	j₂/(A?mg^?1)	j₁/j₂
25	0.372	0.444	0.838
35	0.626	0.628	0.997
45	0.985	0.866	1.137
55	1.328	1.082	1.227
65	1.666	1.286	1.295

Wavenumber/cm^?1	Assignment
2341–2345	O―C―O asymmetric stretching
2040–2060	linearly adsorbed CO_L
1713–1723	C―O stretching of acetaldehyde and acetic acid in solution
1640–1650 1274–1284	H―O―H bending coupling C―O stretching and OH deformation of acetic acid

[1]	Xiaohui Li, Xiaodong Li, Quanhu Sun, Jianjiang He, Ze Yang, Jinchong Xiao, Changshui Huang. Synthesis and Applications of Graphdiyne Derivatives [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(1): 2206029-0.
[2]	Mingliang Wu, Yehui Zhang, Zhanzhao Fu, Zhiyang Lyu, Qiang Li, Jinlan Wang. Structure-Activity Relationship of Atomic-Scale Cobalt-Based N-C Catalysts in the Oxygen Evolution Reaction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(1): 2207007-0.
[3]	Mingjun Ma, Zhichao Feng, Xiaowei Zhang, Chaoyue Sun, Haiqing Wang, Weijia Zhou, Hong Liu. Progress in the Preparation and Application of Electrocatalysts Based on Microorganisms as Intelligent Templates [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(6): 2106003-.
[4]	Yuke Song, Wenfu Xie, Mingfei Shao. Recent Advances in Integrated Electrode for Electrocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(6): 2101028-.
[5]	Ying Liu, Xiaofang Liu, Lin Xia, Chaojie Huang, Zhaoxuan Wu, Hui Wang, Yuhan Sun. Methanol Synthesis by CO_x Hydrogenation over Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ Catalyst via Hydrotalcite-Like Precursors: the Role of CO in the Reactant Mixture [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(3): 2002017-.
[6]	Yadong Du, Xiangtong Meng, Zhen Wang, Xin Zhao, Jieshan Qiu. Graphene-Based Catalysts for CO₂ Electroreduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(2): 2101009-.
[7]	Xiaoxiong Huang, Yingjie Ma, Linjie Zhi. Ultrathin Nitrogenated Carbon Nanosheets with Single-Atom Nickel as an Efficient Catalyst for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(2): 2011050-.
[8]	Yongxia Shi, Man Hou, Junjun Li, Li Li, Zhicheng Zhang. Cu-Based Tandem Catalysts for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(11): 2206020-.
[9]	Yuxin Chen, Lijun Wang, Zhibo Yao, Leiduan Hao, Xinyi Tan, Justus Masa, Alex W. Robertson, Zhenyu Sun. Tuning the Coordination Structure of Single Atoms and Their Interaction with the Support for Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(11): 2207024-0.
[10]	Zhengrong Li, Tao Shen, Yezhou Hu, Ke Chen, Yun Lu, Deli Wang. Progress on Ordered Intermetallic Electrocatalysts for Fuel Cells Application [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(9): 2010029-.
[11]	Jiashun Liang, Xuan Liu, Qing Li. Principles, Strategies, and Approaches for Designing Highly Durable Platinum-based Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(9): 2010072-.
[12]	Zengqiang Gao, Congyong Wang, Junjun Li, Yating Zhu, Zhicheng Zhang, Wenping Hu. Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalysis:Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(7): 2010025-.
[13]	Xueqing Gao, Shujiao Yang, Wei Zhang, Rui Cao. Biomimicking Hydrogen-Bonding Network by Ammoniated and Hydrated Manganese (Ⅱ) Phosphate for Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(7): 2007031-.
[14]	Rui Qin, Pengyan Wang, Can Lin, Fei Cao, Jinyong Zhang, Lei Chen, Shichun Mu. Transition Metal Nitrides: Activity Origin, Synthesis and Electrocatalytic Applications [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(7): 2009099-.
[15]	Kangning Zhao, Xiao Li, Dong Su. High-Entropy Alloy Nanocatalysts for Electrocatalysis [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(7): 2009077-.

Effect of Temperature on the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Ethanol

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0