水系锌离子电池用钒基正极材料的研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202005013

Abstract

Abstract:

In the past few decades, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have dominated the market of rechargeable batteries and are extensively applied in the field of electronic devices (e.g., mobile phones and computers). However, lack of lithium resources, high cost of lithium as well as toxic and flammable organic electrolytes significantly hinder further development and large-scale application of LIBs. Therefore, it is necessary to develop next-generation green rechargeable batteries to replace LIBs. Recently, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs) have been considered as energy storage devices with substantial development prospects for future large-scale storage systems owing to their high safety performance, low production cost, abundant zinc resources, and environmental friendliness. Typically, we use zinc metal as the anode with neutral or weakly acidic aqueous electrolyte (pH: 3.6–6.0). However, cathode materials have high requirements for AZIBs while considering the charge effect of multivalent metal ions. Currently, one of the research emphases is to develop suitable zinc ion intercalation cathode materials with stable structures and high capacities. Among all types of cathode materials, vanadium-based compounds have the advantages of low cost and high reversible capacity. Additionally, their structure is variable, mainly including layered, tunneled and natrium super ionic conductor (NASICON) structure. Therefore, vanadium-based compounds have clear application possibility in AZIBs. However, there are still several significant problems. In particular, vanadium-based compounds generally have poor conductivity and low voltage platform. Electrochemical performance can be significantly improved mainly by pre-inserting metal ions or water molecules, optimizing the electrolyte, and controlling morphology of nanomaterials (nanosheets, nanospheres, etc.). In addition, the zinc storage mechanism in vanadium-based compounds is more complicated and controversial, including Zn²⁺ intercalation/deintercalation mechanism, co-insertion mechanism, and conversion reaction mechanism. Moreover, different materials usually exhibit different electrochemical properties and energy storage mechanisms. In this review, we comprehensively describe the energy storage mechanisms of vanadium-based compounds and discuss the application as well as development status of vanadium-based materials in AZIBs. Further, several strategies for improving their performance are proposed, including structural design (e.g., pre-insertion of metal ions or water molecules), morphology control (e.g., carbon coating), and electrolyte optimization (e.g., adjustment of composition and concentration). In particular, pre-insertion of metal ions or water molecules in the original structure can effectively solve these problems of low ion diffusion rate, poor conductivity, and structural instability, thereby achieving excellent electrochemical performance. Moreover, the application of a high-concentration electrolyte is a simple and effective strategy that can not only significantly widen the electrochemical stability window of the aqueous electrolyte but also suppress the dissolution of vanadium, thereby effectively improving energy density and cycling stability for AZIBs. Accordingly, the future development direction of AZIBs and their vanadium-based cathode materials is further prospected, aiming at designing high-performance electrode materials for AZIBs.

Key words: Aqueous zinc-ion battery, Cathode material, Vanadium-based compound, Electrolyte, Energy storage mechanism

MSC2000:

O646

Yongli Heng, Zhenyi Gu, Jinzhi Guo, Xinglong Wu. Research Progresses on Vanadium-Based Cathode Materials for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(3): 2005013.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Table 1

Several vanadium-based cathode materials for AZIBs reported in recent years."

Materials morphology	Structure (space group)	Electrolyte	Ion (de-) intercalation mechanism	Discharge plateaus/V	Specific capacity/(mAh·g^-1)	Cycle number	Ref.
Bulk V₂O₅	Pmmn	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺, H₂O	0.42 and 0.85	470 (0.2 A·g^-1)	4000 (91.1%, 5 A·g^-1)	27
Porous V₂O₅	Pmmn	21 mol·L^-1 LiTFSI-1 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Li⁺, Zn²⁺	0.90 and 1.10	238 (50 mA·g^-1)	2000 (80%, 2000 mA·g^-1)	33
V₂O₅ hollow nanospheres	Pmmn	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺	0.56 and 0.85	327 (0.1 A·g^-1)	6000 (69.7%, 10 A·g^-1)	39
V₂O₅ nanosheets	Pmmn	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	0.47 and 0.88	503.1 (100 mA·g^-1)	700 (86%, 500 mA·g^-1)	40
V₂O₅@AB nanosheets	Pmmn	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	0.50 and 0.90	452 (0.1 A·g^-1)	5000 (92%, 10 A·g^-1)	41
V₂O₅·nH₂O nanowires/graphene (n = 1.29)	P1	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	0.54 and 0.91	372 (0.3 A·g^-1)	900 (71%, 6 A·g^-1)	46
V₂O₅·1.6H₂O nanosheets	P1	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	0.50 and 0.90	426 (0.1 A·g^-1)	5000 (95%, 10 A·g^-1)	42
Zn_0.25V₂O₅·nH₂O nanobelts	P${\rm{\bar 1}}$	1 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺, H₂O	≈ 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0	282 (300 mA·g^-1)	1000 (80%, 3000 mA·g^-1)	25
Li_xV₂O₅·nH₂O nanosheets	P1	2 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺	0.59, 0.82 and 0.96	407.6 (1 A·g^-1)	500 (76%, 5 A·g^-1)	47
Ca_0.25V₂O₅·nH₂O nanobelts	P1	1 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺	≈ 0.7, 1.1 and 1.3	340 (0.05 A·g^-1)	3000 (96%, 20 A·g^-1)	49
Porous Mg_0.34V₂O₅·nH₂O nanobelts	P1	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺, Mg²⁺	≈ 0.4, 0.7 and 1.3	353 (50 mA·g^-1)	2000 (97%, 5000 mA·g^-1)	51
Cu_0.1V₂O₅·nH₂O nanosheets	P1	2 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺	0.59, 0.81 and 0.96	359 (1 A·g^-1)	10000 (98%, 10 A·g^-1)	52
Ag_0.33V₂O₅ nanorods	C2/m	2 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	0.604, 0.915 and 1.082	200 (0.2 A·g^-1)	700 (3 A·g^-1)	50
VO₂(B) nanorods	C2/m	1 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺	0.42, 0.51 and 0.74	325.6 (0.05 A·g^-1)	5000 (86%, 3 A·g^-1)	59
VO₂(B) nanorods/rGO	C2/m	1 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺	0.55 and 0.78	365 (50 mA·g^-1)	200 (80%, 50 mA·g^-1)	60
VO₂(B)·0.2H₂O nanocuboids/graphene	C2/m	2 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺	0.44 and 0.58	423 (0.25 A·g^-1)	1000 (87%, 8 A·g^-1)	61
VO₂(A) hollow spheres	P4₂/nmc	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	0.44, 0.52 and 0.90	357 (0.1 A·g^-1)	500 (76%, 5 A·g^-1)	56
VO₂(D) hollow nanospheres	P2₁/c	3 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺, H₂O, H⁺	0.57 and 0.92	408 (0.1 A·g^-1)	10000 (58.2%, 10 A·g^-1)	62
Porous VO₂(M)/CNTs	P2₁/c	2 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	H⁺	0.55 and 0.85	248 (2 A·g^-1)	5000 (84.5%, 20 A·g^-1)	63
Na₃V₂(PO₄)₃/C nanoparticles	R3${\bar c}$	0.5 mol·L^-1 Zn(CH₃COO)₂	Zn²⁺	1.1	97 (50 mA·g^-1)	100 (74%, 50 mA·g^-1)	64
Na₃V₂(PO₄)₃@rGO microspheres	R3${\bar c}$	2 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Na⁺, Zn²⁺	1.02 and 1.26	114 (50 mA·g^-1)	200 (75%, 500 mA·g^-1)	65
Na₃V₂(PO₄)₂F₃@C microparticles	P42/mnm	2 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	1.25 and 1.62	60 (0.2 A·g^-1)	4000 (95%, 1 A·g^-1)	66
VOPO₄ microsheets	Pbam	21 mol·L^-1 LiTFSI-1 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺	1.20, 1.34, 1.53 and 1.82	139 (0.05 A·g^-1)	1000 (93%, 5 A·g^-1)	67
VS₂ nanosheets	P${\rm{\bar 3}}$ml	1 mol·L^-1 Zn(SO₄)₂	Zn²⁺, H₂O	0.63 and 0.72	190.3 (0.05 A·g^-1)	200 (98%, 0.5 A·g^-1)	68
VS₄@rGO nanoparticles	I2/a	1 mol·L^-1 Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	Zn²⁺ (and conversion mechanism)	0.54 and 0.89	180 (1 A·g^-1)	165 (83.3%, 1 A·g^-1)	69

Table 1

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

References 76

1	Chu S. ; Majumdar A. Nature 2012, 488, 294. doi: 10.1038/nature11475
2	Stougie L. ; Giustozzi N. ; van der Kooi H. ; Stoppato A. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 2916. doi: 10.1002/er.4037
3	Yang Y. Q. ; Bremner S. ; Menictas C. ; Kay M. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2018, 91, 109. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.047
4	Abraham K. M. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 830. doi: 10.1021/jz5026273
5	Li M. ; Lu J. ; Chen Z. W. ; Amine K. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800561
6	Sarma D. D. ; Shukla A. K. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2841. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01966
7	Yoshino A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5798. doi: 10.1002/anie.201105006
8	Liu Z. Y. ; Huang Y. ; Huang Y. ; Yang Q. ; Li X. L. ; Huang Z. D. ; Zhi C. Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 180. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00131j
9	Wang Y. G. ; Yi J. ; Xia Y. Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 830. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201200065
10	Fang G. Z. ; Zhou J. ; Pan A. Q. ; Liang S. Q. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2480. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01426
11	Li H. F. ; Ma L. T. ; Han C. P. ; Wang Z. F. ; Liu Z. X. ; Tang Z. J. ; Zhi C. Y. Nano Energy 2019, 62, 550. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.059
12	Ming J. ; Guo J. ; Xia C. ; Wang W. X. ; Alshareef H. N. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2019, 135, 58. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2018.10.002
13	Selvakumaran D. ; Pan A. Q. ; Liang S. Q. ; Cao G. Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18209. doi: 10.1039/c9ta05053a
14	Song M. ; Tan H. ; Chao D. L. ; Fan H. J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802564. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201802564
15	Xu C. J. ; Li B. H. ; Du H. D. ; Kang F. Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 933. doi: 10.1002/anie.201106307
16	Alfaruqi M. H. ; Mathew V. ; Gim J. ; Kim S. ; Song J. ; Baboo J. P. ; Choi S. H. ; Kim J. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3609. doi: 10.1021/cm504717p
17	Guo C. ; Liu H. M. ; Li J. F. ; Hou Z. G. ; Liang J. W. ; Zhou J. ; Zhu Y. C. ; Qian Y. T. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 304, 370. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.008
18	Islam S. ; Alfaruqi M. H. ; Mathew V. ; Song J. ; Kim S. ; Kim S. ; Jo J. ; Baboo J. P. ; Pham D. T. ; Putro D. Y. ; et al J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 23299. doi: 10.1039/c7ta07170a
19	Khamsanga S. ; Pornprasertsuk R. ; Yonezawa T. ; Mohamad A. A. ; Kheawhom S. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44915-8
20	Wang C. Y. ; Wang M. Q. ; He Z. C. ; Liu L. ; Huang Y. D. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 1742. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02220
21	Wei C. G. ; Xu C. J. ; Li B. H. ; Du H. D. ; Kang F. Y. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2012, 73, 1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2011.11.038
22	Trocoli R. ; La Mantia F. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 481. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201403143
23	Zhang L. Y. ; Chen L. ; Zhou X. F. ; Liu Z. P. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1400930. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201400930
24	Zhang L. Y. ; Chen L. ; Zhou X. F. ; Liu Z. P. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 18263. doi: 10.1038/srep18263
25	Kundu D. ; Adams B. D. ; Duffort V. ; Vajargah S. H. ; Nazar L. F. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16119. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.119
26	Xu X. M. ; Xiong F. Y. ; Meng J. S. ; Wang X. P. ; Niu C. J. ; An Q. Y. ; Mai L. Q. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1904398. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201904398
27	Zhang N. ; Dong Y. ; Jia M. ; Bian X. ; Wang Y. Y. ; Qiu M. D. ; Xu J. Z. ; Liu Y. C. ; Jiao L. F. ; Cheng F. Y. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1366. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00565
28	Li Y. K. ; Huang Z. M. ; Kalambate P. K. ; Zhong Y. ; Huang Z. M. ; Xie M. L. ; Shen Y. ; Huang Y. H. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 752. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.009
29	Zhou J. ; Shan L. T. ; Wu Z. X. ; Guo X. ; Fang G. Z. ; Liang S. Q. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 4457. doi: 10.1039/c8cc02250j
30	Kühnel R. S. ; Reber D. ; Battaglia C. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 2005. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00623
31	Zhang N. ; Cheng F. Y. ; Liu Y. C. ; Zhao Q. ; Lei K. X. ; Chen C. C. ; Liu X. S. ; Chen J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12894. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05958
32	Huang S. ; Zhu J. C. ; Tian J. L. ; Niu Z. Q. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 14480. doi: 10.1002/chem.201902660
33	Hu P. ; Yan M. Y. ; Zhu T. ; Wang X. P. ; Wei X. J. ; Li J. T. ; Zhou L. ; Li Z. H. ; Chen L. N. ; Mai L. Q. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 42717. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b13110
34	Chen X. L. ; Wang L. B. ; Li H. ; Cheng F. Y. ; Chen J. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 38, 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.12.023
35	Dong Y. ; Di S. L. ; Zhang F. B. ; Bian X. ; Wang Y. Y. ; Xu J. Z. ; Wang L. B. ; Cheng F. Y. ; Zhang N. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 3252. doi: 10.1039/c9ta13068c
36	Zhang N. ; Cheng F. Y. ; Liu J. X. ; Wang L. B. ; Long X. H. ; Liu X. S. ; Li F. J. ; Chen J. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 405. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00467-x
37	Zhang N. ; Dong Y. ; Wang Y. Y. ; Wang Y. X. ; Li J. J. ; Xu J. Z. ; Liu Y. C. ; Jiao L. F. ; Cheng F. Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 32978. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b10399
38	Zhang N. ; Jia M. ; Dong Y. ; Wang Y. Y. ; Xu J. Z. ; Liu Y. C. ; Jiao L. F. ; Cheng F. Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807331. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807331
39	Chen L. L. ; Yang Z. H. ; Cui F. ; Meng J. L. ; Chen H. Z. ; Zeng X. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 507, 145137. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145137
40	Javed M. S. ; Lei H. ; Wang Z. L. ; Liu B. T. ; Cai X. ; Mai W. J. Nano Energy 2020, 70, 104573. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104573
41	Wang X. Y. ; Ma L. W. ; Sun J. K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 41297. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b13103
42	Wang X. Y. ; Ma L. W. ; Zhang P. C. ; Wang H. Y. ; Li S. ; Ji S. J. ; Wen Z. S. ; Sun J. K. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 502, 144207. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144207
43	Chen D. ; Rui X. H. ; Zhang Q. ; Geng H. B. ; Gan L. Y. ; Zhang W. ; Li C. C. ; Huang S. M. ; Yu Y. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 171. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.034
44	Ding Y. C. ; Peng Y. Q. ; Chen W. Y. ; Niu Y. J. ; Wu S. G. ; Zhang X. X. ; Hu L. H. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 493, 368. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.026
45	Wang H. L. ; Bi X. X. ; Bai Y. ; Wu C. ; Gu S. C. ; Chen S. ; Wu F. ; Amine K. ; Lu J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602720. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602720
46	Yan M. Y. ; He P. ; Chen Y. ; Wang S. Y. ; Wei Q. L. ; Zhao K. N. ; Xu X. ; An Q. Y. ; Shuang Y. ; Shao Y. Y. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703725. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703725
47	Yang Y. Q. ; Tang Y. ; Fang G. Z. ; Shan L. T. ; Guo J. S. ; Zhang W. Y. ; Wang C. ; Wang L. B. ; Zhou J. ; Liang S. Q. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 3157. doi: 10.1039/c8ee01651h
48	Xu G. B. ; Liu X. ; Huang S. J. ; Li L. ; Wei X. L. ; Cao J. X. ; Yang L. W. ; Chu P. K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 706. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b17653
49	Xia C. ; Guo J. ; Li P. ; Zhang X. X. ; Alshareef H. N. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 3943. doi: 10.1002/anie.201713291
50	Lan B. X. ; Peng Z. ; Chen L. N. ; Tang C. ; Dong S. J. ; Chen C. ; Zhou M. ; Chen C. ; An Q. Y. ; Luo P. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 787, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.078
51	Ming F. W. ; Liang H. F. ; Lei Y. J. ; Kandambeth S. ; Eddaoudi M. ; Alshareef H. N. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2602. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01423
52	Yang Y. Q. ; Tang Y. ; Liang S. Q. ; Wu Z. X. ; Fang G. Z. ; Cao X. X. ; Wang C. ; Lin T. Q. ; Pan A. Q. ; Zhou J. Nano Energy 2019, 61, 617. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.005
53	Geng H. B. ; Cheng M. ; Wang B. ; Yang Y. ; Zhang Y. F. ; Li C. C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1907684. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201907684
54	Liu F. ; Chen Z. X. ; Fang G. Z. ; Wang Z. Q. ; Cai Y. S. ; Tang B. Y. ; Zhou J. ; Liang S. Q. Nanomicro Lett. 2019, 11, 25. doi: 10.1007/s40820-019-0256-2
55	Liu S. C. ; Zhu H. ; Zhang B. H. ; Li G. ; Zhu H. K. ; Ren Y. ; Geng H. B. ; Yang Y. ; Liu Q. ; Li C. C. Adv. Mater. 2020, e2001113. doi: 10.1002/adma.202001113
56	Li R. X. ; Yu X. ; Bian X. F. ; Hu F. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 35117. doi: 10.1039/c9ra07340j
57	Lee S. ; Ivanov I. N. ; Keum J. K. ; Lee H. N. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19621. doi: 10.1038/srep19621
58	Ni J. ; Jiang W. T. ; Yu K. ; Sun F. ; Zhu Z. Q. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2011, 46, 507. doi: 10.1002/crat.201100110
59	Chen L. N. ; Ruan Y. S. ; Zhang G. B. ; Wei Q. L. ; Jiang Y. L. ; Xiong T. F. ; He P. ; Yang W. ; Yan M. Y. ; An Q. Y. ; et al Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 699. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03409
60	Park J. S. ; Jo J. H. ; Aniskevich Y. ; Bakavets A. ; Ragoisha G. ; Streltsov E. ; Kim J. ; Myung S. T. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 6777. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02679
61	Jia D. D. ; Zheng K. ; Song M. ; Tan H. ; Zhang A. T. ; Wang L. H. ; Yue L. J. ; Li D. ; Li C. W. ; Liu J. Q. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 215. doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2603-5
62	Chen L. L. ; Yang Z. H. ; Huang Y. G. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 13032. doi: 10.1039/c9nr03129d
63	Zhang L. S. ; Miao L. ; Zhang B. ; Wang J. S. ; Liu J. ; Tan Q. Y. ; Wan H. Z. ; Jiang J. J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 1731. doi: 10.1039/c9ta11031c
64	Li G. L. ; Yang Z. ; Jiang Y. ; Jin C. H. ; Huang W. ; Ding X. L. ; Huang Y. H. Nano Energy 2016, 25, 211. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.051
65	Hu P. ; Zhu T. ; Wang X. P. ; Zhou X. F. ; Wei X. J. ; Yao X. H. ; Luo W. ; Shi C. W. ; Owusu K. A. ; Zhou L. ; et al Nano Energy 2019, 58, 492. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.068
66	Li W. ; Wang K. L. ; Cheng S. J. ; Jiang K. Energy Stor. Mater. 2018, 15, 14. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.003
67	Wan F. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhang L. L. ; Liu D. B. ; Wang C. D. ; Song L. ; Niu Z. Q. ; Chen J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 7062. doi: 10.1002/anie.201902679
68	He P. ; Yan M. Y. ; Zhang G. B. ; Sun R. M. ; Chen L. N. ; An Q. Y. ; Mai L. Q. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1601920. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601920
69	Qin H. G. ; Yang Z. H. ; Chen L. L. ; Chen X. ; Wang L. M. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 23757. doi: 10.1039/c8ta08133f
70	Dai X. ; Wan F. ; Zhang L. L. ; Cao H. M. ; Niu Z. Q. Energy Stor. Mater. 2019, 17, 143. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.07.022
71	Wei T. Y. ; Li Q. ; Yang G. Z. ; Wang C. X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 8006. doi: 10.1039/c8ta02090f
72	Song W. X. ; Hou H. S. ; Ji X. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 103.
	宋维鑫; 侯红帅; 纪效波. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 103. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201608303
73	Jian Z. L. ; Zhao L. ; Pan H. L. ; Hu Y. S. ; Li H. ; Chen W. ; Chen L. Q. Electrochem. Commun. 2012, 14, 86. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.11.009
74	Gu Z. Y. ; Guo J. Z. ; Yang Y. ; Zhao X. X. ; Yang X. ; Nie X. J. ; He X. Y. ; Wu X. L. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 35, 1535.
	谷振一; 郭晋芝; 杨洋; 赵欣欣; 杨旭; 聂雪娇; 何晓燕; 吴兴隆. 无机化学学报, 2019, 35, 1535. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2019.188
75	Guo J. Z. ; Wan F. ; Wu X. L. ; Zhang J. P. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 32, 265.
	郭晋芝; 万放; 吴兴隆; 张景萍. 分子科学学报, 2016, 32, 265. doi: 10.13563/j.cnki.jmolsci.2016.04.001
76	Hu P. ; Zou Z. Y. ; Sun X. W. ; Wang D. ; Ma J. ; Kong Q. Y. ; Xiao D. D. ; Gu L. ; Zhou X. H. ; Zhao J. W. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907526. doi: 10.1002/adma.201907526

[1]	Hao-Tian Teng, Wen-Tao Wang, Xiao-Feng Han, Xiang Hao, Ruizhi Yang, Jing-Hua Tian. Recent Development and Perspectives of Flexible Zinc-Air Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(1): 2107017-0.
[2]	Feng Wu, Qing Li, Lai Chen, Zirun Wang, Gang Chen, Liying Bao, Yun Lu, Shi Chen, Yuefeng Su. An Optimized Synthetic Process for the Substitution of Cobalt in Nickel-Rich Cathode Materials [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(5): 2007017-.
[3]	Zheng Bo, Jing Kong, Huachao Yang, Zhouwei Zheng, Pengpeng Chen, Jianhua Yan, Kefa Cen. Ultra-Low-Temperature Supercapacitor Based on Holey Graphene and Mixed-Solvent Organic Electrolyte [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(4): 2005054-.
[4]	Xinrun Yu, Jun Ma, Chunbo Mou, Guanglei Cui. Percolation Structure Design of Organic-inorganic Composite Electrolyte with High Lithium-Ion Conductivity [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(3): 1912061-.
[5]	Zixu He, Yawei Chen, Fanyang Huang, Yulin Jie, Xinpeng Li, Ruiguo Cao, Shuhong Jiao. Fluorinated Solvents for Lithium Metal Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(11): 2205005-.
[6]	Yuanhao Shen, Qingyu Wang, Jie Liu, Cheng Zhong, Wenbin Hu. Spontaneous Reduction and Adsorption of K₃[Fe(CN)₆] on Zn Anodes in Alkaline Electrolytes: Enabling a Long-Life Zn-Ni Battery [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2022, 38(11): 2204048-0.
[7]	Jujia Zhang, Jin Zhang, Haining Wang, Yan Xiang, Shanfu Lu. Advancement in Distribution and Control Strategy of Phosphoric Acid in Membrane Electrode Assembly of High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(9): 2010071-.
[8]	Liliang Tian, Weiqi Zhang, Zheng Xie, Kai Peng, Qiang Ma, Qian Xu, Sivakumar Pasupathi, Huaneng Su. Enhanced Performance and Durability of High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell by Incorporating Covalent Organic Framework into Catalyst Layer [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(9): 2009049-.
[9]	Jiangtao Huang, Jiang Zhou, Shuquan Liang. Guest Pre-Intercalation Strategy to Boost the Electrochemical Performance of Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Cathodes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(3): 2005020-.
[10]	Yuefeng Su, Qiyu Zhang, Lai Chen, Liying Bao, Yun Lu, Shi Chen, Feng Wu. Effects of ZrO₂ Coating on Ni-Rich LiNi_0.8Co_0.1Mn_0.1O₂ Cathodes with Enhanced Cycle Stabilities [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(3): 2005062-.
[11]	Gaolong Zhu, Chenzi Zhao, Hong Yuan, Haoxiong Nan, Bochen Zhao, Lipeng Hou, Chuangxin He, Quanbing Liu, Jiaqi Huang. Liquid Phase Therapy with Localized High-Concentration Electrolytes for Solid-State Li Metal Pouch Cells [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2005003-.
[12]	Jun Guan, Nianwu Li, Le Yu. Artificial Interphase Layers for Lithium Metal Anode [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2009011-.
[13]	Zhida Wang, Yuancheng Feng, Songtao Lu, Rui Wang, Wei Qin, Xiaohong Wu. Improvement in Performance of Three-Dimensional SnLi/Carbon Paper Anode in Lean Electrolyte with In Situ Fluorinated Protection Layer [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2008082-.
[14]	Guangbin Hua, Yanchen Fan, Qianfan Zhang. Application of Computational Simulation on the Study of Lithium Metal Anodes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2008089-.
[15]	Chen Wu, Ying Zhou, Xiaolong Zhu, Minzhi Zhan, Hanxi Yang, Jiangfeng Qian. Research Progress on High Concentration Electrolytes for Li Metal Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2008044-.

Research Progresses on Vanadium-Based Cathode Materials for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 76

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0