基于CdS和CdSe纳米半导体材料的可见光催化二氧化碳还原研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202008043

Abstract

Abstract:

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) is one of the main greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The conversion of CO₂ into solar fuels (CO, HCOOH, CH₄, CH₃OH, etc.) using artificial photosynthetic systems is an ideal way to utilize CO₂ as a resource and reduce CO₂ emissions. A typical artificial photosynthetic system is composed of three key components: a photosensitizer (PS) to harvest visible light, a catalyst (C) to catalyze CO₂ or protons into carbon-based fuels or H₂, respectively, and a sacrificial electron donor (SED) to consume the holes generated in the PS. In most cases, the PS and catalyst are two different components of a system. However, some components that possess both light harvesting and redox catalysis functionalities, e.g., nano-semiconductors, are referred to as photocatalysts. During photocatalysis, the PS is typically excited by photons to generate excited electrons. The excited electrons in the PS are transferred to the catalyst to generate a reduced catalyst. The reduced catalyst is used as an active intermediate to perform CO₂ binding and transformation. The PS can be recovered through a reaction with the SED. Nano-semiconductors have been used as photosensitizers and/or photocatalysts in photocatalytic CO₂ reduction systems owing to their excellent photophysical and photochemical properties and photostability. CdS and CdSe nano-semiconductors, such as quantum dots, nanorods, and nanosheets, have been widely used in the construction of photocatalytic CO₂ reduction systems. Systems based on CdS or CdSe nano-semiconductors can be classified into three categories. The first category is systems based on CdS or CdSe photocatalysts. In these systems, CdS or CdSe nano-semiconductors function as photocatalysts to catalyze CO₂ reduction without a co-catalyst under visible-light irradiation. The CO₂ reduction reaction occurs at the surface of the CdS or CdSe nano-semiconductors. The second category is systems based on CdS or CdSe composite photocatalysts. CdS or CdSe nano-semiconductors are combined with functional materials, such as reduced graphene oxide or TiO₂, to prepare composite photocatalysts. These composite photocatalysts are expected to improve the lifetime of the charge separation state and inhibit the photocorrosion of the nano-semiconductors during photocatalysis. The third category is hybrid systems containing a CdS nano-semiconductor and molecular catalysts, such as nickel and cobalt complexes and iron porphyrin. In these hybrid systems, CdS functions as a photosensitizer and the CO₂ reduction reaction occurs at the molecular catalyst. This review article introduces the construction of artificial photosynthetic systems and the photocatalytic mechanism of nano-semiconductors, and summarizes the representative works in the three aforementioned categories of systems. Finally, the challenges of nano-semiconductors for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction are discussed.

Key words: Artificial photosynthesis, CO₂ reduction, CdS nano-semiconductor, CdSe quantum dots, Molecular catalyst

MSC2000:

O644

Jin Wu, Jing Liu, Wu Xia, Ying-Yi Ren, Feng Wang. Advances on Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Based on CdS and CdSe Nano-Semiconductors[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2008043.

Figures/Tables 5

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Table 1

References 63

1	Cowan A. J. ; Durrant J. R. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2281. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35305a
2	Fresno F. ; Portela R. ; Suarezc S. ; Coronado M. J. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014, 2, 2863. doi: 10.1039/c3ta13793g
3	Yu J. ; Low J. ; Xiao W. ; Zhou P. ; Jaroniec M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8839. doi: 10.1021/ja5044787
4	Li X. ; Wen J. ; Low J. ; Fang Y. ; Yu J. Sci. China Mater. 2014, 57, 70. doi: 10.1007/s40843-014-0003-1
5	Liu Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1912045.
	刘志敏. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1912045. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912045
6	Praus P. ; Kozak O. ; Koci K. ; Panacek A. ; Dvorsky R. J. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2011, 360, 574. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.004
7	Beigi A. A. ; Fatemi S. ; Salehi S. J J. CO₂ Util. 2014, 7, 23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2014.06.003
8	Nie R. ; Ma W. ; Dong Y. ; Xu Y. ; Wang J. ; Wang J. ; Jing H. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 3342. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201800190
9	Gao Y. ; Liu S. ; Zhao Z. ; Tao H. ; Sun Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 858.
	高云楠; 刘世桢; 赵振清; 陶亨聪; 孙振宇. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 858. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201802061
10	Liu X. ; Inagaki S. ; Gong J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14924. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600395
11	Windle C. D. ; Perutz R. N. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 2562. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.010
12	Wu J. ; Huang Y. ; Ye W. ; Li Y. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1700194. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700194
13	Yui T. ; Tamaki Y. ; Sekizawa K. ; Ishitani O. Top. Curr. Chem. 2011, 303, 151. doi: 10.1007/128_2011_139
14	Maeda K. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1808205. doi: 10.1002/adma.201808205
15	Akhundi A. ; Habibi-Yangjeh A. ; Abitorabi M. ; Pouran S. R. Catal. Rev. 2019, 61, 595. doi: 10.1080/01614940.2019.1654224
16	Zhu C. -Y. ; Huang Y. -C. ; Hu J. -C. ; Wang F. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 2018, 38, 175. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.09.056
17	Hu J. -C. ; Gui M. -X. ; Xia W. ; Wu J. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 7, 10475. doi: 10.1039/c9ta00949c
18	Pan Z. M. ; Liu M. H. ; Niu P. P. ; Guo F. S. ; Fu X. Z. ; Wang X. C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36 (1), 1906014.
	潘志明; 刘明辉; 牛萍萍; 郭芳松; 付贤智; 王心晨. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36 (1), 1906014. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906014
19	Zhou L. ; Zhang X. H. ; Lin L. ; Li P. ; Shao K. J. ; Li C. Z. ; He T. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (9), 1884.
	周亮; 张雪华; 林琳; 李盼; 邵坤娟; 李春忠; 贺涛. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (9), 1884. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705084
20	Hu J. -C. ; Sun S. ; Li M. -D. ; Xia W. ; Wu J. ; Liu H. ; Wang F. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 14490. doi: 10.1039/c9cc08512b
21	Xu C. ; Anusuyadevi P. R. ; Aymonier C. ; Luque R. ; Marre S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 3868. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00102f
22	Li Q. ; Li X. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. ; Yu J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500010. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201500010
23	Li X. -B. ; Tung C. -H. ; Wu L.-Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 10804. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901267
24	Yuan Y.-J. ; Chen A. ; Yu Z. -T. ; Zou Z. -G. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 11606. doi: 10.1039/c8ta00671g
25	Fujiwara H. ; Hosokawa H. ; Murakoshi K. ; Wada Y. ; Yanagida S. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1997, 101, 8270. doi: 10.1021/jp971621q
26	Liu B. -J. ; Torimoto T. ; Yoneyama H. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 1998, 113, 93. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(97)00318-3
27	Yang X. ; Xin W. ; Yin X. ; Shao X. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. 2018, 1, 78. doi: 10.1007/s11595-018-1789-9
28	Kandy M. M. ; Gaikar V. G. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 102, 440. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.02.054
29	Chai Y. ; Lu J. ; Li L. ; Li D. ; Li M. ; Liang J. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 10, 2697. doi: 10.1039/C8CY00274F
30	Brus L. J.Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 2555. doi: 10.1021/j100403a003
31	Wang L. G. ; Pennycook S. J. ; Pantelides S. T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 075506. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.075506
32	Sheng H. ; Oh M. H. ; Osowiecki W. T. ; Kim W. ; Alivisatos A. P. ; Frei H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 4363. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b00271
33	Xia W. ; Wu J. ; Hu J. -C. ; Sun S. ; Li M. ; Liu H. ; Lan M. ; Tung C. -H. ; Wu L. -Z. ; Wang F. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 4617. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201901633
34	Guo Q. ; Liang F. ; Li X. -B. ; Gao Y. -J. ; Huang M. -Y. ; Wang Y. ; Xia S. -G. ; Gao X. -Y. ; Gan Q. -C. ; Lin Z. -S. ; et al Chem 2019, 5, 2605. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.06.019
35	Koci K. ; Praus P. ; Edelmannová M. ; Ambrožová N. ; Troppová I. ; Fridrichová D. ; Słowik G. ; Ryczkowski J. J.Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 4041. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2017.13093
36	Ijaz S. ; Ehsan M. F. ; Ashiq M. N. ; Karamat N. ; He T. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 390, 550. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.098
37	Benedetti J. E. ; Bernardo D. R. ; Morais A. ; Bettini J. ; Nogueira A. F. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 33914. doi: 10.1039/c4ra15605f
38	Ijaz S. ; Ehsan M. F. ; Ashiq M. N. ; Karamt N. ; Najam-ul-Haq M. ; He T. Mater. Des. 2016, 107, 178. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.031
39	Park H. ; Ou H. -H. ; Kang U. ; Choi J. ; Hoffmann M. R. Catal. Today 2016, 266, 153. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.017
40	Wei Y. ; Jiao J. ; Zhao Z. ; Liu J. ; Li J. ; Jiang G. ; Wang Y. ; Duan A. Appl. Catal. B- Environ. 2015, 179, 422. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.041
41	Yu J. ; Jin J. ; Cheng B. ; Jaroniec M. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014, 2, 3407. doi: 10.1039/c3ta14493c
42	Li X. ; Liu H. ; Luo D. ; Li J. ; Huang Y. ; Li H. ; Fang Y. ; Xu Y. ; Zhu L. Chem. Eng.J. 2012, 180, 151. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.11.029
43	Wang J. ; Xia T. ; Wang L. ; Zheng X. ; Qi Z. ; Gao C. ; Zhu J. ; Li Z. ; Xu H. ; Xiong Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16447. doi: 10.1002/anie.201810550
44	Wang C. ; Thompson R. L. ; Baltrus J. ; Matranga J. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 48. doi: 10.1021/jz9000032
45	Peng H.-J. ; Zheng P. -Q. ; Chao H. -Y. ; Jiang L. ; Qiao Z.-P. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 551. doi: 10.1039/c9ra08801f
46	Wang F. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 4393. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201701385
47	Chai Z. G. ; Li Q. ; Xu D. X. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 44991. doi: 10.1039/c4ra08848d
48	Lin J. L. ; Qin B. ; Fang Z. X. Catal. Lett. 2019, 149, 25. doi: 10.1007/s10562-018-2586-y
49	Kuehnel M. F. ; Orchard K. L. ; Dalle K. E. ; Reisner E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 7217. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00369
50	Kuehnel M. F. ; Sahm C. D. ; Neri G. ; Lee J. R. ; Orchard K. L. ; Cowan A. J. ; Reisner E. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2501. doi: 10.1039/c7sc04429a
51	Huang J. ; Gatty M. G. ; Xu B. ; Pati P. B. ; Etman A. S. ; Tian L. ; Sun J. L. ; Tian H. N. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 10775. doi: 10.1039/c8dt01631c
52	Suzuki T. M. ; Yoshino S. N. ; Takayama T. ; Iwase A. ; Kudo A. ; Morikawa T. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 10199. doi: 10.1039/c8cc05505j
53	Bao Y. P. ; Wang J. ; Wang Q. ; Cui X. F. ; Long R. ; Li Z. Q. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 2507. doi: 10.1039/c9nr09321d
54	Lian S. C. ; Kodaimati M. S. ; Dolzhnikov D. S. ; Calzada R. ; Weiss E. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8931. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b03134
55	Lian S. C. ; Kodaimati M. S. ; Weiss E. A. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 568. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07377
56	Bi Q. -Q. ; Wang J. -W. ; Lv J. -X. ; Wang J. ; Zhang W. ; Lu T.-B. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 11815. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03457
57	Li P. ; Hou C. C. ; Zhang X. H. ; Chen Y. ; He T. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 459, 292. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.002
58	Li P. ; Zhang X. ; Hou C. ; Chen Y. ; He T. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2018, 238, 656. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.066
59	Chen C. J. ; Wu T. B. ; Wu H. H. ; Liu H. Z. ; Qian Q. L. ; Liu Z. M. ; Yang G. Y. ; Han B. X. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 8890. doi: 10.1039/c8sc02809e
60	Gui M. -X. ; Wu J. ; Hu J. -C. ; Xia W. ; Liu H. ; Feng N. ; Li W. ; Wang F. J.Photochem. Photobiol. A. 2020, 401, 112742. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112742
61	Fu J. ; Yu J. ; Jiang C. ; Cheng B. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701503. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701503
62	Yin S. ; Han J. ; Zhou T. ; Xu R. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 5048. doi: 10.1039/c5cy00938c
63	He F. ; Wang Z. ; Li Y. ; Peng S. ; Liu B. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2020, 269, 118828. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118828

Entry	Photocatalyst	Cocatalyst	SED	Solvent	Main Product	Selectivity	Efficiency^a	Ref.
1	CdS	–	TEA	DMF	CO	–	–	25
2	CdS	–	2-propanol	CH₃CN/CH₂Cl₂	HCOOH	80%	–	26
3	CdS	–	CH₃OH	CH₃OH	HCOOCH₃	–	3951.9 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	27
4	CdS	–	–	H₂O	CH₃OH	–	144.5 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	28
5	CdS	–	TEOA	H₂O	CO	–	1.6 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	29
6	CdSe	–	TEA	DMF	CO	95%	7.9 × 10⁵ μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	33
7	CdSe/CdS	–	TEA	DMF	CO	96%	4.1 × 10⁵ μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	34
8	rGO/CdS	–	–	H₂O vapor	CH₄	–	2.5 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	41
9	CdS/TiO₂	–	–	H₂O	CH₃OH	–	31.9 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	42
10	CdS QDs (doping Ni²⁺)	–	TEOA	H₂O	CO	100%	35^b	43
11	CdSe/TiO₂	–	–	H₂O	CH₄	–	0.6 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	44
12	CdSe/ZIF-8	–	TEOA	CH₃CN	CO	–	3.5 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	45
13	CdS	Co-bipy	TEOA	CH₃CN	CO	87%	844 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	47
14	CdS	C1	TEOA	CH₃CN/H₂O	CO	80%	46.5 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	48
15	CdS	C2	TEOA	CH₃CN/H₂O	CO	3.9%	0.40 ± 0.02 ^b	49
16	CdS	C3	TEOA	CH₃CN/H₂O	CO	10.2%	1.07 ± 0.17 ^b	49
17	CdS	C4	TEOA	CH₃CN/H₂O	CO	92.2%	5.11 ± 0.10 ^b	49
18	CdS	C5	TEOA	H₂O	CO	95%	1380^b	56
19	CdS	C6	TEOA	CH₃CN/H₂O	CO	97%	7.5 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	57
20	CdS/Bi₂S₃	C6	TEOA	CH₃CN/H₂O	CO	–	1.9 × 10³ μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	58
21	CdS/UiO-bpy/Co	–	TEOA	CH₃CN	CO	85%	235 μmol∙g⁻¹∙h⁻¹	59

[1]	Leiduan Hao, Zhenyu Sun. Metal Oxide-Based Materials for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(7): 2009033-0.
[2]	Xingang Fei, Haiyan Tan, Bei Cheng, Bicheng Zhu, Liuyang Zhang. 2D/2D Black Phosphorus/g-C₃N₄ S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalysts for CO₂ Reduction Investigated using DFT Calculations [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(6): 2010027-0.
[3]	Yunfeng Li, Min Zhang, Liang Zhou, Sijia Yang, Zhansheng Wu, Ma Yuhua. Recent Advances in Surface-Modified g-C₃N₄-Based Photocatalysts for H₂ Production and CO₂ Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(6): 2009030-0.
[4]	Xinjiang Cui, Feng Shi. Selective Conversion of CO₂ by Single-Site Catalysts [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2006080-0.
[5]	Frits Mathias Dautzenberg, Yong Lu, Bin Xu. Controlling the Global Mean Temperature by Decarbonization [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2008066-0.
[6]	Huidong Jin, Likun Xiong, Xiang Zhang, Yuebin Lian, Si Chen, Yongtao Lu, Zhao Deng, Yang Peng. Cu-Based Catalyst Derived from Nitrogen-Containing Metal Organic Frameworks for Electroreduction of CO₂ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(11): 2006017-0.
[7]	Shuhua Duan,Shufeng Wu,Lei Wang,Houde She,Jingwei Huang,Qizhao Wang. Rod-Shaped Metal Organic Framework Structured PCN-222(Cu)/TiO₂ Composites for Efficient Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(3): 1905086-0.
[8]	Hanlin Lyu, Bing Hu, Guoliang Liu, Xinlin Hong, Lin Zhuang. Inverse Decoration of ZnO on Small-Sized Cu/Sio₂ with Controllable Cu-ZnO Interaction for CO₂ Hydrogenation to Produce Methanol [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(11): 1911008-0.
[9]	Zhiming Pan,Minghui Liu,Pingping Niu,Fangsong Guo,Xianzhi Fu,Xinchen Wang. Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Using Ni₂P Nanosheets [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(1): 1906014-0.
[10]	Hui NING,Wenhang WANG,Qinhu MAO,Shirui ZHENG,Zhongxue YANG,Qingshan ZHAO,Mingbo WU. Catalytic Electroreduction of CO₂ to C₂H₄ Using Cu₂O Supported on 1-Octyl-3-methylimidazole Functionalized Graphite Sheets [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(8): 938-944.
[11]	Quan QUAN,Shun-Ji XIE,Ye WANG,Yi-Jun XU. Photoelectrochemical Reduction of CO₂ Over Graphene-Based Composites:Basic Principle, Recent Progress, and Future Perspective [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(12): 2404-2423.
[12]	Qing-Gong ZHU,Xiao-Fu SUN,Xin-Chen KANG,Jun MA,Qing-Li QIAN,Bu-Xing HAN. Cu₂S on Cu Foam as Highly Efficient Electrocatalyst for Reduction of CO₂ to Formic Acid [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2016, 32(1): 261-266.
[13]	ZHANG Jing-Bo, LI Pan, YANG Hui, ZHAO Fei-Yan, TANG Guang-Shi, SUN Li-Na, LIN Yuan. Preparation of a Highly Efficient PbS Electrode and Its Application in Quantum Dots-Sensitized Solar Cells [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2014, 30(8): 1495-1500.

Advances on Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Based on CdS and CdSe Nano-Semiconductors

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 63

Related Articles 13

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

Advances on Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Based on CdS and CdSe Nano-Semiconductors

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 63

Related Articles 13

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

Advances on Photocatalytic CO₂ Reduction Based on CdS and CdSe Nano-Semiconductors