植物基多孔炭材料在超级电容器中的应用

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201903055

Abstract

Abstract:

Supercapacitors have been widely used in various fields because of their high power density, long cycle life, and cost-effectiveness. Plant-based porous carbon continues to be the most suitable alternative for manufacturing the commercial electrode materials of supercapacitors because of its good electrochemical performance, simple preparation process, high availability, and low cost. Although plant-based porous carbon prepared using physical activation has been widely used in commercial supercapacitors, its performance is severely restricted because of its low value of specific surface area and highly microporous structure. With a view to achieving high values of specific gravimetric/volumetric capacitances and outstanding rate performance in supercapacitors, this review summarizes the recently developed methods for preparing plant-based ultrahigh specific surface area porous carbon materials, mesoporous carbon materials, hierarchical porous carbon materials, and nitrogen-doped porous carbon materials. The factors affecting the electrochemical performance of plant-based porous carbon are also discussed. We also summarize some novel strategies to improve the volumetric electrochemical performance of plant-based porous carbon materials, such as preparing dense and porous carbon materials, performing heteroatom doping, and combining the carbon with pseudocapacitive materials (conductive polymers or metal oxides). Finally, the challenges and perspectives of using plant-based porous carbon in supercapacitors are also proposed. In brief, when used as the electrode material for supercapacitors, the ultrahigh surface area porous carbon prepared by KOH activation shows high value of specific capacitance at low current densities. However, the tortuous and deep micropores in the plant-based porous carbon result in its sluggish ion-transport kinetics and high value of equivalent series resistance, which, in turn, result in poor rate performance. To improve the rate performance, tremendous efforts have been made to introduce mesopores in the carbon as ion-transport channels. However, this strategy usually involves the coalescence of a large number of micropores, resulting in the reduced surface area as well as energy storage ability of the carbon. Hence, many researchers have utilized the inherent porous structure and inorganic templates of plants to prepare hierarchical porous carbon both with high specific surface area and high mesopore volume for use in devices with high capacitance and power. In addition to altering the surface area and pore structure of the carbon, doping with nitrogen is another promising approach to enhance the capacitance and electronic conductivity of the plant-based porous carbon. Surface nitrogen can be introduced by the direct carbonization/activation of nitrogen-rich plant precursors or by the reaction of the carbon with nitrogen-containing reagents. Porous carbon with large specific area and with developed mesoporous structure may exhibit superior gravimetric capacitance but inferior volumetric capacitance because of the trade-off between its well-developed microporous structure and packing density. To improve the volume performance, some methods, such as preparing dense and porous carbon with reasonably porous structure, using heteroatom-doped carbon, and incorporating the carbon with pseudocapacitive materials, have been developed. Although the electrochemical performance of plant-based porous carbon has been significantly improved using the aforementioned methods, yet issues such as the lack of green methods and low-cost activation methods to prepare large surface area porous carbon, the design and controlled modulation of carbon micro-structures, the influence of heteroatom doping on pseudocapacitance, and weak interaction between pseudocapacitive components and plant-based porous carbon still need to be resolved. We hope that this review may provide the necessary background and ideas to develop more effective preparation methods for high-performance plant-based porous carbon.

Key words: Supercapacitor, Electrode material, Plant, Porous carbon, Electrochemical performance

MSC2000:

O646

Nannan Guo,Su Zhang,Luxiang Wang,Dianzeng Jia. Application of Plant-Based Porous Carbon for Supercapacitors[J].Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1903055.

Figures/Tables 15

Fig 1

Table 1

Fig 2

Table 2

Comparison of electrochemical performance of plants-based porous carbon materials with different porous structure."

Precursor	Specific surface area/ (m²∙g⁻¹)	Pore Volume/ (cm³∙g⁻¹)	Specific capacitance/ (F∙g⁻¹)	Scan rate	Specific capacitance / (F∙g⁻¹)	Scan rate	Unit surface area capacitance /(F∙m⁻²)	Rate performance	Electrolyte	Testing system	Reference
Tremella	3760	2.15	284	1 A∙g⁻¹	214	30 A∙g⁻¹	0.076	0.75	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	94
Celtuce leave	3404	1.88	421	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	293	10 A∙g^-1	0.124	0.70	2 mol∙L^-1 KOH	Three electrode	95
			271	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	156	10 A∙g^-1	0.08	0.58	2 mol∙L^-1 KOH	Two electrode
Corn gluten meal	3353	2.07	488	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	220	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.146	0.45	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	96
			298	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	165	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.089	0.55	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode
Liquefied wood	3223	1.686	247	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	227	10 A∙g⁻¹	0.077	0.92	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Two electrode	97
Cabbage leaves	3102	1.41	336	1 A∙g⁻¹	271	10 A∙g⁻¹	0.108	0.80	2 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	98
Hemp stem	3062	1.44	318	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	193	50 A∙g⁻¹	0.104	0.61	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	55
			230	1 A∙g⁻¹	170	50 A∙g⁻¹	0.075	0.74	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode
Bamboo	3061	1.46	258	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	93	5 A∙g⁻¹	0.084	0.36	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	99
Glucose	2760	1.3	~240	1 A∙g⁻¹	138	90 A∙g⁻¹	0.087	0.58	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Two electrode	54
			3050	2.4	138	0.2 A∙g⁻¹	113	30 A∙g⁻¹	0.041	0.82	EMIM BF₄
Various pollen	3037	2.27	185	1 A∙g⁻¹	–	–	0.061	–	TEABF₄	Two electrode	100
			207	1 A∙g⁻¹	–	–	0.068	–	EMIMBF₄	Two electrode
Eucalyptus sawdust	2950	1.46	268	0.2 A∙g⁻¹	132	100 A∙g⁻¹	0.091	0.49	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Two electrode	53
			168	1 A∙g⁻¹	128	60 A∙g⁻¹	0.057	0.76	EMIM TFSI
Garlic skin	2818	1.33	427	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	315	50 A∙g⁻¹	0.152	0.74	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	101
Pomelo peel	2725	1.28	~245	1 A∙g⁻¹	163.2	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.09	0.67	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	57
Corn straw	2790	2.04	~282	1 A∙g⁻¹	205	100 A∙g⁻¹	0.101	0.73	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	16
			~210	1 A∙g⁻¹	68	60 A∙g⁻¹	0.075	0.32	1 mol∙L⁻¹ Na₂SO₄	Two electrode
Spruce bark	2385	1.68	~280	1 A∙g⁻¹	249	10 A∙g⁻¹	0.117	0.89	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	56
Sugarcane bagasse	2341	1.07	320	1 A∙g⁻¹	264	100 A∙g⁻¹	0.137	0.83	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	102
Shaddock skin	2327	1.56	152	1 A∙g⁻¹	132	100 A∙g⁻¹	0.065	0.87	EMIMTFSI	Two electrode	45
shaddock skin	2300	1	180	1 A∙g⁻¹	–	–	0.078	–	0.5 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Three electrode	103
Moringa oleifera stem	2250	2.5	~220	0.2 A∙g⁻¹	195	5 A∙g⁻¹	0.097	0.87	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Two electrode	44
Clover	2244	1.44	436	1 A∙g⁻¹	298	50 A∙g⁻¹	0.194	0.68	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Three electrode	104
Soybean root	2143	0.94	260	1 A∙g⁻¹	225	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.121	0.87	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	15
Soybean residue	2130	0.92	258	0.2 A∙g⁻¹	159	80 A∙g⁻¹	0.121	0.62	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Two electrode	105
Tobacco rod	2115	1.22	~224	1 A∙g⁻¹	~148	15 A∙g⁻¹	0.117	0.66	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	106
Elm samara	1947	1.33	310	1 A∙g⁻¹	198	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.159	0.64	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	9
Apricot shell	1790	0.96	268	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	212	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.15	0.79	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO4	Two electrode	42
Lignin	1690	0.78	240	1 A∙g⁻¹	209	30 A∙g⁻¹	0.142	0.87	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	107
Cherry calyce	1612	1.2	303	1 A∙g⁻¹	259	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.188	0.85	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	108
Auricularia	1607	1.57	347	1 A∙g⁻¹	278	50 A∙g⁻¹	0.216	0.8	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	109
Cellulose	1535	0.87	198	1 A∙g⁻¹	133	10 A∙g⁻¹	0.129	0.67	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	110
Algae	1338	0.59	143	1 A∙g⁻¹	79	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.107	0.55	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	111
Cellulose	1326	–	296	2 mV∙s⁻¹	221	500mV∙s⁻¹	0.223	0.75	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	112
Banana fiber	1097	–	86	5 mV∙s⁻¹	83	100 mV∙s⁻¹	0.078	0.97	1 mol∙L⁻¹ Na₂SO₄	Two electrode	113
Lotus	1015	0.824	340	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	240	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.335	0.71	2 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	114
Coffee bean	1019	0.48	368	0.05 A∙g⁻¹	–	–	0.361	–	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Three electrode	115
Lignin	903	0.53	247	1 A∙g⁻¹	110	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.274	0.45	7 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	116
Cork	689	0.75	242	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	199	50 A∙g⁻¹	0.351	0.82	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	17
Comparison of electrochemical performance of other porous carbon materials with different porous structure
Activated graphene	3290	–	174	2.1 A∙g⁻¹	–	–	0.053	–	EMIM TFSI/ EMIM BF₄	Two electrode	117
Hierarchical carbon	2582	–	410	5 A∙g⁻¹	349	100 A∙g⁻¹	0.159	0.85	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Three electrode	118
Carbon nanocage	2561	--	205	1 A∙g⁻¹	179	200 A∙g⁻¹	0.008	0.87	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	119
Porous carbon	2000	0.58	202	0.2 A∙g⁻¹	–	–	0.101	–	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Two electrode	120
Graphene	1435	4.11	236.8	1 A∙g⁻¹	171	30 A∙g⁻¹	0.217	0.72	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	121
Carbon xerogel microspheres	1133	0.46	251	0.125 A∙g⁻¹	141	4 A∙g⁻¹	0.222	0.56	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Three electrode	122
Graphene	890	--	200	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	166	10 A∙g⁻¹	0.224	0.83	2 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	123
Graphene/Carbon nanotube	652	--	199	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	99	20 A∙g⁻¹	0.305	0.50	EMIM BF₄	Two electrode	124
Graphene	630	0.42	255	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	100	30 A∙g⁻¹	0.403	0.39	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	125
Activated carbon	511	0.25	164	0.1 mA∙cm⁻²	134	20 mA∙cm^-2	0.320	0.82	30% (w) KOH	Two electrode	126

Table 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Table 3

Table 4

Comparison of electrochemical performance of plant-based porous carbon materials with different pore structures."

Precursor	Specific surface area/(m²∙g⁻¹)	Pore volume/ (cm³∙g⁻¹)	Gravimetric capacitance/(F∙g⁻¹)	Density/ (g∙cm⁻³)	Volumetric capacitance/(F∙cm⁻³)	Scan rate	Electrolyte	Testing system	Reference
Elm samara	1947	1.33	470	0.57	267	1 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	9
Hemp stem	3062	1.72	318	0.23	73	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	55
Pomelo peel	2725	1.28	342	0.5	171	0.2 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	57
Celtuce leave	3290	1.71	421	0.45	190	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	2 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	95
Garlic skin	2818	1.32	427	0.38	162	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Two electrode	101
Sodium lignosulfonate	905	0.53	247	0.97	240	0.05 A∙g⁻¹	7 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	116
Soybean	580	0.41	425	1.1	468	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	14
Perilla frutescens	655	0.44	270	1.06	287	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	140
Pomelo peel	832	0.57	374	0.93	349	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	145
Willow catkin	997	0.51	306	0.99	303	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	146
Auricularia	1103	0.54	374	0.96	360	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	147
Kelp	1002	0.62	440	0.82	360	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	148
Waxberry	658.5	0.38	--	--	1320.4	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	149
Jujube	829	0.45	449	1.06	476	1 mV∙s⁻¹	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Three electrode	150
Bacterial cellulose	1037	1.04	261	0.65	170	2 mV∙s⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	151
Corn straw	1413	0.68	378.9	0.85	321.1	0.05 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	152
Comparison of electrochemical performance of other porous carbon materials with different pore structures
Activated graphene	3290	–	174	0.59	100	1 A∙g⁻¹	EMIMTFSI	Two electrode	117
Hierarchical carbon	2582	–	207	0.72	149	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	BMIMPF6/AN	Two electrode	118
Carbon nanocage	2561	–	205	0.46	94	1 A∙g⁻¹	KOH	Two electrode	119
Graphene/Carbon nanotube	652	–	199	1.06	211	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	EMIM BF₄	Two electrode	124
Graphene	630	0.42	255	0.77	196	0.5 A∙g⁻¹	6 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH	Three electrode	125
Activated carbon	511	0.25	164	1.04	170	1 mA∙cm⁻²	30% KOH (w)	Two electrode	126
Carbon nanotube	–	–	159	0.83	132	50 mV∙s⁻¹	1 mol∙L⁻¹ H₂SO₄	Three electrode	153
Carbon nanotube	–	–	260	0.5	130	0.1 A∙g⁻¹	EMIM BF₄	Two electrode	154
Porous graphene	–	–	298	0.70	212	1 A∙g⁻¹	EMIM BF₄	Two electrode	155

Table 4

Fig 10

Fig 11

References 155

1	Wang J. ; Nie P. ; Ding B. ; Dong S. ; Hao X. ; Dou H. ; Zhang X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (6), 2411. doi: 10.1039/C6TA08742F
2	Xie K. ; Wei B. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26 (22), 3592. doi: 10.1002/adma.201305919
3	Yan J. ; Wang Q. ; Wei T. ; Fan Z. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4 (4), 1300816. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201300816
4	El-Kady M. F. ; Strong V. ; Dubin S. ; Kaner R. B. Science 2012, 335 (6074), 1326. doi: 10.1126/science.1216744
5	Islam M. S. ; Fisher C. A. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (1), 185. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60199D
6	Wu Z. S. ; Parvez K. ; Feng X. ; Müllen K. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2487. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3487
7	Zhu Y. ; Murali S. ; Stoller M. D. ; Ganesh K. J. ; Cai W. ; Ferreira P. J. ; Pirkle A. ; Wallace R. M. ; Cychosz K. A. ; Thommes M. ; et al Science 2011, 332 (6037), 1537. doi: 10.1126/science.1200770
8	Weingarth D. ; Zeiger M. ; Jäckel N. ; Aslan M. ; Feng G. ; Presser V. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4 (13), 1400316. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201400316
9	Chen C. ; Yu D. ; Zhao G. ; Du B. ; Tang W. ; Sun L. ; Sun Y. ; Besenbacher F. ; Yu M. Nano Energy 2016, 27, 377. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.07.020
10	Li D. Y. ; Zhang J. C. ; Wang Z. Y. ; Jin X. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (11), 2245. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705241
	李道琰; 张基琛; 王志勇; 金先波. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (11), 2245. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705241
11	Long W. ; Fang B. ; Ignaszak A. ; Wu Z. ; Wang Y. J. ; Wilkinson D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (23), 7176. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00639F
12	Deng J. ; Li M. ; Wang Y. Green Chem. 2016, 18 (18), 4824. doi: 10.1039/C6GC01172A
13	Field C. B. ; Behrenfeld M. J. ; Randerson J. T. ; Falkowski P. Science 1998, 281 (5374), 237. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.237
14	Long C. ; Jiang L. ; Wu X. ; Jiang Y. ; Yang D. ; Wang C. ; Wei T. ; Fan Z. Carbon 2015, 93, 412. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.040
15	Guo N. ; Li M. ; Wang Y. ; Sun X. ; Wang F. ; Yang R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (49), 33626. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b11162
16	Qiu Z. ; Wang Y. ; Bi X. ; Zhou T. ; Zhou J. ; Zhao J. ; Miao Z. ; Yi W. ; Fu P. ; Zhuo S. J. Power Sources 2018, 376, 82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.077
17	Qiu D. ; Guo N. ; Gao A. ; Zheng L. ; Xu W. ; Li M. ; Wang F. ; Yang R. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 294, 398. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.049
18	Sun L. ; Tian C. ; Li M. ; Meng X. ; Wang L. ; Wang R. ; Yin J. ; Fu H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1 (21), 6462. doi: 10.1039/C3TA10897J
19	Li Z. ; Lv W. ; Zhang C. ; Li B. ; Kang F. ; Yang Q. H. Carbon 2015, 92, 11. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.054
20	Wang Y. ; Ben T. ; Qiu S. L. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2016, 37 (6), 1042. doi: 10.7503/cjcu20160075
	王昀; 贲腾; 裘式纶. 高等学校化学学报, 2016, 37 (6), 1042. doi: 10.7503/cjcu20160075
21	Ma Y. W. ; Xiong C. Y. ; Huang W. ; Zhao J. ; Li X. A. ; Fan Q. L. ; Huang W. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 28 (3), 546.
	马延文; 熊传银; 黄雯; 赵进; 李兴螯; 范曲立; 黄维. 无机化学学报, 2012, 28 (3), 546.
22	Wu. Z. Y ; Fan L. ; Tao Y. R. ; Wang W. ; Wu X. C. ; Zhao J. W. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 34 (7), 1249. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.166
	武中钰; 范蕾; 陶友荣; 王伟; 吴兴才; 赵健伟. 无机化学学报, 2018, 34 (7), 1249. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.166
23	Guo P. ; Ji Q. ; Zhang L. ; Zhao S. ; Zhao X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27 (12), 2836. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20112836
	郭培志; 季倩倩; 张丽莉; 赵善玉; 赵修松. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27 (12), 2836. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20112836
24	Jiang L. ; Sheng L. ; Fan Z. Sci. China Mater. 2018, 61 (2), 133. doi: 10.1007/s40843-017-9169-4
25	Lu H. ; Zhao X. S. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2017, 1 (6), 1265. doi: 10.1039/C7SE00099E
26	Xia W. ; Li Z. ; Xu Yin. ; Zhuang X. ; Jia S. ; Zhang J. Prog. Chem. 2016, 28 (11), 1682. doi: 10.7536/PC160517
	夏文; 李政; 徐银莉; 庄旭品; 贾士儒; 张健飞. 化学进展, 2016, 28 (11), 1682. doi: 10.7536/PC160517
27	Wu Z. ; Zhang X. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (2), 305. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201611012
	吴中; 张新波. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (2), 305. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201611012
28	Li X. Q. ; Chang L. ; Zhao S. L. ; Hao C. L. ; Lu C. G. ; Zhu Y. H. ; Tang Z. Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (1), 130. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201609012
	李雪芹; 常琳; 赵慎龙; 郝昌龙; 陆晨光; 朱以华; 唐智勇. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (1), 130. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201609012
29	Isikgor F. H. ; Becer C. R. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6 (25), 4497. doi: 10.1039/C5PY00263J
30	Balat M. Energy Source Part A 2008, 30 (7), 620. doi: 10.1080/15567030600817258
31	Mészáros E. ; Jakab E. ; Várhegyi G. ; Bourke J. ; Manley-Harris M. ; Nunoura T. ; Antal M. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46 (18), 5943. doi: 10.1021/ie0615842
32	Mi J. ; Wang X. R. ; Fan R. J. ; Qu W. H. ; Li W. C. Energy Fuels 2012, 26 (8), 5321. doi: 10.1021/ef3009234
33	Wei J. ; Iglesia E. J. Catal. 2004, 224 (2), 370. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.02.032
34	Sevilla M. ; Fuertes A. B. ; Mokaya R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4 (4), 1400. doi: 10.1039/C0EE00347F
35	Wang J. ; Kaskel S. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22 (45), 23710. doi: 10.1039/C2JM34066F
36	Cabal B. ; Budinova T. ; Ania C. O. ; Tsyntsarski B. ; Parra J. B. ; Petrova B. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161 (2), 1150. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.108
37	Duan X. H. ; Srinivasakannan C. ; Peng J. H. ; Zhang L. B. ; Zhang Z. Y. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92 (3), 394. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.09.033
38	Aworn A. ; Thiravetyan P. ; Nakbanpote W. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2008, 82 (2), 279. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2008.04.007
39	Bouchelta C. ; Medjram M. S. ; Bertrand O. ; Bellat J. P. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2008, 82 (1), 70. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2007.12.009
40	Yang K. ; Peng J. ; Srinivasakannan C. ; Zhang L. ; Xia H. ; Duan X. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101 (15), 6163. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.001
41	Nabais J. M. V. ; Nunes P. ; Carrott P. J. M. ; Ribeiro Carrott M. M. L. ; GarcíaA. M. ; Díaz-Díez M. A. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89 (3), 262. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.11.030
42	Shu Y. ; Maruyama J. ; Iwasaki S. ; Maruyama S. ; Shen Y. ; Uyama H. J. Power Sources 2017, 364, 374. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.059
43	Rufford T. E. ; Hulicova-Jurcakova D. ; Khosla K. ; Zhu Z. ; Lu G. Q. J. Power Sources 2010, 195 (3), 912. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.048
44	Cai Y. ; Luo Y. ; Dong H. ; Zhao X. ; Xiao Y. ; Liang Y. ; Hu H. ; Liu Y. ; Zheng M. J. Power Sources 2017, 353, 260. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.021
45	Tian W. ; Gao Q. ; Tan Y. ; Li Z. Carbon 2017, 119, 287. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.04.050
46	Xu B. ; Chen Y. ; Wei G. ; Cao G. ; Zhang H. ; Yang Y. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 124 (1), 504. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.07.002
47	Foo K. Y. ; Hameed B. H. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173 (2), 385. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.07.073
48	Deng H. ; Zhang G. ; Xu X. ; Tao G. ; Dai J. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 182 (1), 217. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.018
49	Huang L. ; Sun Y. ; Wang W. ; Yue Q. ; Yang T. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171 (3), 1446. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.041
50	Hejazifar M. ; Azizian S. ; Sarikhani H. ; Li Q. ; Zhao D. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2011, 92 (1), 258. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.06.007
51	Tay T. ; Ucar S. ; Karagöz S. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 165 (1), 481. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.011
52	Foo K. Y. ; Hameed B. H. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104, 679. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.005
53	Sevilla M. ; Ferrero G. A. ; Fuertes A. B. Carbon 2017, 114, 50. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.010
54	Sevilla M. ; Fuertes A. B. ChemSusChem 2016, 9 (14), 1880. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600426
55	Wang Y. ; Yang R. ; Li M. ; Zhao Z. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 65, 216. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.008
56	Sun Z. ; Zheng M. ; Hu H. ; Dong H. ; Liang Y. ; Xiao Y. ; Lei B. ; Liu Y. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 336, 550. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.019
57	Liang Q. ; Ye L. ; Huang Z. H. ; Xu Q. ; Bai Y. ; Kang F. ; Yang Q. H. Nanoscale 2014, 6 (22), 13831. doi: 10.1039/C4NR04541F
58	Yu Z. L. ; Li G. C. ; Fechler N. ; Yang N. ; Ma Z. Y. ; Wang X. ; Antonietti M. ; Yu S. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (47), 14623. doi: 10.1002/anie.201605510
59	Hou J. ; Cao C. ; Idrees F. ; Ma X. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (3), 2556. doi: 10.1021/nn506394r
60	Yahya M. A. ; Al-Qodah Z. ; Ngah C. W. Z. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 46, 218. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.051
61	Donald J. ; Ohtsuka Y. ; Xu C. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65 (4), 744. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.11.049
62	Funke A. ; Ziegler F. Bioful Bioprod. Biorefin. 2010, 4 (2), 160. doi: 10.1002/bbb.198
63	Titirici M. M. ; White R. J. ; Brun N. ; Budarin V. L. ; Su D. S. ; del Monte F. ; Clark J. H. ; MacLachlan M. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44 (1), 250. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00232F
64	Baccile N. ; Falco C. ; Titirici M. M. Green Chem. 2014, 16 (12), 4839. doi: 10.1039/C3GC42570C
65	Libra J. A. ; Ro K. S. ; Kammann C. ; Funke A. ; Berge N. D. ; Neubauer Y. ; Titirici M. M. ; Fühner C. ; Bens O. ; Kern J. R. Biofuels 2011, 2 (1), 71. doi: 10.4155/bfs.10.81
66	Titirici M. M. ; Antonietti M. ; Baccile N. Green Chem. 2008, 10 (11), 1204. doi: 10.1039/B807009A
67	Zhao L. ; Fan L. Z. ; Zhou M. Q. ; Guan H. ; Qiao S. ; Antonietti M. ; Titirici M. M. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22 (45), 5202. doi: 10.1002/adma.201002647
68	Kubo S. ; Tan I. ; White R. J. ; Antonietti M. ; Titirici M. M. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22 (24), 6590. doi: 10.1021/cm102556h
69	Ren Y. ; Xu Q. ; Zhang J. ; Yang H. ; Wang B. ; Yang D. ; Hu J. ; Liu Z. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6 (12), 9689. doi: 10.1021/am502035g
70	Yu Z. ; Wang X. ; Song X. ; Liu Y. ; Qiu J. Carbon 2015, 95, 852. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.105
71	Wang J. ; Ding B. ; Hao X. ; Xu Y. ; Wang Y. ; Shen L. ; Dou H. ; Zhang X. Carbon 2016, 102, 255. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.047
72	Chang Y. ; Antonietti M. ; Fellinger T.-P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (18), 5507. doi: 10.1002/anie.201411685
73	Yin H. ; Lu B. ; Xu Y. ; Tang D. ; Mao X. ; Xiao W. ; Wang D. ; Alshawabkeh A. N. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (14), 8101. doi: 10.1021/es501739v
74	Elumeeva K. ; Fechler N. ; Fellinger T. P. ; Antonietti M. Mater. Horiz. 2014, 1 (6), 588. doi: 10.1039/C4MH00123K
75	Liu X. ; Giordano C. ; Antonietti M. Small 2014, 10 (1), 193. doi: 10.1002/smll.201300812
76	Simon P. ; Gogotsi Y. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 845. doi: 10.1038/nmat2297
77	Wang D. W. ; Li F. ; Liu M. ; Lu G. Q. ; Cheng H. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47 (2), 373. doi: 10.1002/anie.200702721
78	Wang Q. ; Yan J. ; Wang Y. ; Wei T. ; Zhang M. ; Jing X. ; Fan Z. Carbon 2014, 67, 119. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.070
79	Huang W. ; Zhang H. ; Huang Y. ; Wang W. ; Wei S. Carbon 2011, 49 (3), 838. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.025
80	Chen C. ; Zhang Y. ; Li Y. ; Dai J. ; Song J. ; Yao Y. ; Gong Y. ; Kierzewski I. ; Xie J. ; Hu L. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10 (2), 538. doi: 10.1039/C6EE03716J
81	Cheng P. ; Li T. ; Yu H. ; Zhi L. ; Liu Z. ; Lei Z. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (4), 2079. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11280
82	Guo N. ; Li M. ; Wang Y. ; Sun X. ; Wang F. ; Yang R. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (103), 101372. doi: 10.1039/C6RA22426A
83	Li H. ; Qi. C. ; Tao Y. ; Liu H. ; Wang D. ; Li F. ; Yang Q. H. ; Cheng H. M. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 1900079. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900079
84	Wang Q. ; Yan J. ; Dong Z. L. ; Qu L. T. ; Fan Z. J. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2015, 1 (42), 504. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.001
85	Xu B. ; Wu F. ; Chen R. ; Cao G. P. ; Chen S. ; Zhou Z. ; Yang Y. S. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10 (5), 795. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.02.033
86	Xu B. ; Zhang H. ; Cao G. P. ; Zhang W. F. ; Yang Y. S. Prog. Chem. 2011, 23 (Z1), 605.
	徐斌; 张浩; 曹高萍; 张文峰; 杨裕生. 化学进展, 2011, 23 (Z1), 605.
87	Wang Q. ; Yan J. ; Fan Z. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9 (3), 729. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03109E
88	Liu H. ; Song H. ; Chen X. ; Zhang S. ; Zhou J. ; Ma Z. J. Power Sources 2015, 285, 303. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.115
89	Xu B. ; Zheng D. ; Jia M. ; Cao G. P. ; Yang Y. S. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 98, 176. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.053
90	Zhu Z. H. ; Hatori H. ; Wang S. B. ; Lu G. Q. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109 (35), 16744. doi: 10.1021/jp051787o
91	Zhi M. ; Xiang C. ; Li J. ; Li M. ; Wu N. Nanoscale 2013, 5 (1), 72. doi: 10.1039/C2NR32040A
92	Wang G. ; Zhang L. ; Zhang J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (2), 797. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15060J
93	Wang P. ; Ye H. ; Yin Y. X. ; Chen H. ; Bian Y. B. ; Wang Z. R. ; Cao F. F. ; Guo Y. G. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31 (4), 1805134. doi: 10.1002/adma.201805134
94	Guo N. ; Li M. ; Sun X. ; Wang F. ; Yang R. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 201, 399. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.08.054
95	Wang R. ; Wang P. ; Yan X. ; Lang J. ; Peng C. ; Xue Q. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4 (11), 5800. doi: 10.1021/am302077c
96	Cheng B. H. ; Tian K. ; Zeng R. J. ; Jiang H. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2017, 1 (4), 891. doi: 10.1039/C7SE00029D
97	Jin Z. ; Yan X. ; Yu Y. ; Zhao G. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2 (30), 11706. doi: 10.1039/C4TA01413H
98	Wang P. ; Wang Q. ; Zhang G. ; Jiao H. ; Deng X. ; Liu L. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2016, 20 (2), 319. doi: 10.1007/s10008-015-3042-1
99	Yang C. S. ; Jang Y. S. ; Jeong H. K. Current Applied Phys. 2014, 14 (12), 1616. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2014.09.021
100	Zhang L. ; Zhang F. ; Yang X. ; Leng K. ; Huang Y. ; Chen Y. Small 2013, 9 (8), 1342. doi: 10.1002/smll.201202943
101	Zhang Q. ; Han K. ; Li S. ; Li M. ; Li J. ; Ren K. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (5), 2427. doi: 10.1039/C7NR07158B
102	Niu Q. ; Gao K. ; Tang Q. ; Wang L. ; Han L. ; Fang H. ; Zhang Y. ; Wang S. ; Wang L. Carbon 2017, 123, 290. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.07.078
103	Falco C. ; Sieben J. M. ; Brun N. ; Sevilla M. ; vander Mauelen T. ; Morallón E. ; Cazorla-Amorós D. ; Titirici M. M. ChemSusChem 2013, 6 (2), 374. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201200817
104	Wang C. ; Wu D. ; Wang H. ; Gao Z. ; Xu F. ; Jiang K. J. Power Sources 2017, 363, 375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.097
105	Ferrero G. A. ; Fuertes A. B. ; Sevilla M. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16618. doi: 10.1038/srep16618
106	Zhao Y. Q. ; Lu M. ; Tao P. Y. ; Zhang Y. J. ; Gong X. T. ; Yang Z. ; Zhang G. Q. ; Li H. L. J. Power Sources 2016, 307, 391. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.020
107	Guo N. ; Li M. ; Sun X. ; Wang F. ; Yang R. Green Chem. 2017, 19 (11), 2595. doi: 10.1039/C7GC00506G
108	Yu D. ; Chen C. ; Zhao G. ; Sun L. ; Du B. ; Zhang H. ; Li Z. ; Sun Y. ; Besenbacher F. ; Yu M. ChemSusChem 2018, 11 (10), 1678. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201800202
109	Jiang L. ; Sheng L. ; Chen X. ; Wei T. ; Fan Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4 (29), 11388. doi: 10.1039/C6TA02570F
110	Yi J. ; Qing Y. ; Wu C. ; Zeng Y. ; Wu Y. ; Lu X. ; Tong Y. J. Power Sources 2017, 351, 130. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.036
111	Zhu B. ; Liu B. ; Qu C. ; Zhang H. ; Guo W. ; Liang Z. ; Chen F. ; Zou R. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (4), 1523. doi: 10.1039/C7TA09608A
112	Long C. ; Qi D. ; Wei T. ; Yan J. ; Jiang L. ; Fan Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24 (25), 3953. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201304269
113	Subramanian V. ; Luo C. ; Stephan A. M. ; Nahm K. S. ; Thomas S. ; Wei B. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111 (20), 7527. doi: 10.1021/jp067009t
114	Lu S. Y. ; Jin M. ; Zhang Y. ; Niu Y. B. ; Gao J. C. ; Li C. M. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8 (11), 1702545. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702545
115	Rufford T. E. ; Hulicova-Jurcakova D. ; Zhu Z. ; Lu G. Q. Electrochem. Commun. 2008, 10 (10), 1594. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.08.022
116	Pang J. ; Zhang W. ; Zhang J. ; Cao G. ; Han M. ; Yang Y. Green Chem. 2017, 19 (16), 3916. doi: 10.1039/C7GC01434A
117	Kim T. ; Jung G. ; Yoo S. ; Suh K. S. ; Ruoff R. S. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (8), 6899- 6905. doi: 10.1021/nn402077v
118	Xu J. ; Tan Z. ; Zeng W. ; Chen G. ; Wu S. ; Zhao Y. ; Ni K. ; Tao Z. ; Ikram M. ; Ji H. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (26), 5222. doi: 10.1002/adma.201600586
119	Bu Y. ; Sun T. ; Cai Y. ; Du L. ; Zhuo O. ; Yang L. ; Wu Q. ; Wang X. ; Hu Z. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29 (24), 1700470. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700470
120	Vix-Guterl C. ; Frackowiak E. ; Jurewicz K. ; Friebe M. ; Parmentier J. ; Béguin F. Carbon 2005, 43 (6), 1293. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.12.028
121	Yoon Y. ; Lee K. ; Baik C. ; Yoo H. ; Min M. ; Park Y. ; Lee S. ; Lee H. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (32), 4437. doi: 10.1002/adma.201301230
122	Zapata-Benabithe Z. ; Carrasco-Marín F. ; de Vicente J. ; Moreno-Castilla C. Langmuir 2013, 29 (20), 6166. doi: 10.1021/la4007422
123	Chang L. ; Stacchiola D. ; Hu Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (29), 24655- 24661. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b07381
124	Pham D. ; Lee T. ; Luong D. ; Yao F. ; Ghosh A. ; Le V. ; Kim T. ; Li B. ; Chang J. ; Lee Y. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (2), 2018. doi: 10.1021/nn507079x
125	Lei Z. ; Lu L. ; Zhao X. S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 (4), 6391. doi: 10.1039/C1EE02478G
126	Hulicova-jurcakova D. ; Seredych M. ; Lu G. Q. ; Bandosz T. J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19 (3), 438. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200801236
127	He X. ; Ling P. ; Yu M. ; Wang X. ; Zhang X. ; Zheng M. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 105, 635. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.050
128	Candelaria S. L. ; Garcia B. B. ; Liu D. W. ; Cao G. Z. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 9884. doi: 10.1039/c2jm30923h
129	Paraknowitsch J. P ; Thomas A. ; Antonietti M. J. Mater Chem. 2010, 20, 6746. doi: 10.1039/C0JM00869A
130	Xu S. W. ; Zhao Y. Q. ; Xu Y. X. ; Chen Q. H. ; Zhang G. Q. ; Xu Q. Q. ; Zhao D. D. ; Zhang X. ; Xu C. L. J. Power Sources 2018, 401, 375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.012
131	Li L. ; Zhou Y. ; Zhou H. ; Qu H. ; Zhang C. ; Guo M. ; Liu X. ; Zhang Q. ; Gao B. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7 (1), 1337. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05022
132	Yu W. ; Wang H. ; Liu S. ; Mao N. ; Liu X. ; Shi J. ; Liu W. ; Chen S. ; Wang X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4 (16), 5973. doi: 10.1039/C6TA01821A
133	Li Z. ; Mi H. ; Bai Z. ; Ji C. ; Sun L. ; Gao S. ; Qiu J. J. Power Sources 2019, 418, 112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.034
134	Cheng P. ; Gao S. ; Zang P. ; Yang X. ; Bai Y. ; Xu H. ; Liu Z. ; Lei Z. Carbon 2015, 93, 315. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.05.056
135	Wu X. ; Jiang L. ; Long C. ; Fan Z. Nano Energy 2015, 13, 527. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.03.013
136	Yang X. ; Li M. ; Guo N. ; Yan M. ; Yang R. ; Wang F. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (6), 4365. doi: 10.1039/C5RA24055G
137	Zhu G. ; Ma L. ; Lv H. ; Hu Y. ; Chen T. ; Chen R. ; Liang J. ; Wang X. ; Wang Y. ; Yan C. ; et al Nanoscale 2017, 9 (3), 1237. doi: 10.1039/C6NR08139H
138	Ma G. ; Yang Q. ; Sun K. ; Peng H. ; Ran F. ; Zhao X. ; Lei Z. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 197, 137. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.100
139	Gao S. ; Liu H. ; Geng K. ; Wei X. .Nano Energy 2015, 12, 785. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.02.004
140	Liu B. ; Liu Y. ; Chen H. ; Yang M. ; Li H. J. Power Sources 2017, 341, 309. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.022
141	Liu J. ; Deng Y. ; Li X. ; Wang L. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4 (1), 177. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00926
142	Chen L. ; Ji T. ; Mu L. ; Zhu J. Carbon 2017, 111, 839. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.054
143	Shen W. ; Fan W. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1 (4), 999. doi: 10.1039/C2TA00028H
144	Li Y. ; Zhang S. ; Song H. ; Chen X. ; Zhou J. ; Hong S Electrochim. Acta 2015, 180, 879. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.09.039
145	Liu J. ; Li H. ; Zhang H. ; Liu Q. ; Li R. ; Li B. ; Wang J. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 257, 64. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2017.07.033
146	Wang K. ; Yan R. ; Zhao N. ; Tian X. ; Li X. ; Lei S. ; Song Y. ; Guo Q. ; Liu L. Mater. Lett. 2016, 174, 249. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.03.063
147	Long C. ; Chen X. ; Jiang L. ; Zhi L. ; Fan Z. Nano Energy 2015, 12, 141. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.12.014
148	Li J. ; Liu K. ; Gao X. ; Yao B. ; Huo K. ; Cheng Y. ; Cheng X. ; Chen D. ; Wang B. ; Sun W. ; et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7 (44), 24622. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b06698
149	Dong X. ; Jin H. ; Wang R. ; Zhang J. ; Feng X. ; Yan C. ; Chen S. ; Wang S. ; Wang J. ; Lu J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8 (11), 1702695. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201702695
150	Liu X. ; Ma C. ; Li J. ; Zielinska B. ; Kalenczuk R. J. ; Chen X. ; Chu P. K. ; Tang T. ; Mijowska E. J. Power Sources 2019, 412, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.032
151	Jiang Y. ; Yan J. ; Wu X. ; Shan D. ; Zhou Q. ; Jiang L. ; Yang D. ; Fan Z. J. Power Sources 2016, 307, 190. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.081
152	Xie Q. ; Bao R. ; Zheng A. ; Zhang Y. ; Wu S. ; Xie C. ; Zhao P. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4 (3), 1422. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01417
153	Lee S. W. ; Kim B. S. ; Chen S. ; Shao-Horn Y. ; Hammond P. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 131 (2), 671. doi: 10.1021/ja807059k
154	Zhou Y. ; Ghaffari M. ; Lin M. ; Parsons E. M. ; Liu Y. ; Wardle B. L. ; Zhang Q. M. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 111, 608. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.032
155	Xu Y. ; Lin Z. ; Zhong X. ; Huang X. ; Weiss N. O. ; Huang Y. ; Duan X. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4554. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5554

Precursor	Activator	Reagent	O (mole fraction)	N (mole fraction)	Reference
Hemp stem	KOH	NH₃	17.9%	4.4%	82
Clover	KCl	–	6.9%	2.6%	104
Soybean residue	KOH	–	13.9% (w)	1.6 %(w)	105
Tobacco rod	KOH	–	9.8%	1.3%	106
Wheat gluten	KOH	–	8.5%	1.3%	130
Algae	KOH	–	11.8%	0.9%	132
Soybean dreg	KOH		12.5%	1.9%	133
Mushroom	KOH	–	8.4%	1.7%	134
Flour	KOH	–	11.2%	1.1%	135
Loofa sponge	KOH	–	4.8%	0.7%	136
Pine needle	KOH	–	–	1.5%	137
Potato residue	ZnCl₂	–	–	0.4% (w)	138
Honeysuckles	Pyrolysis	–	14.4%	2%	139
Perilla frutescens	Pyrolysis	–	18.8%	1.7%	140
Sugar bagasse	CaCl₂	Urea	7.0%	5.6%	141
Cotton fabric	Air	Melamine	7.1%	6.9%	142

[1]	Hui Li, Shuangyu Liu, Tianci Yuan, Bo Wang, Peng Sheng, Li Xu, Guangyao Zhao, Huitao Bai, Xin Chen, Zhongxue Chen, Yuliang Cao. Influence of NaOH Concentration on Sodium Storage Performance of Na_0.44MnO₂ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(3): 1907049-0.
[2]	Yongli Tong, Meizhen Dai, Lei Xing, Hengqi Liu, Wanting Sun, Xiang Wu. Asymmetric Hybrid Capacitor Based on NiCo₂O₄ Nanosheets Electrode [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(7): 1903046-0.
[3]	Jiu Wang,Nanshi Wu,Tao Liu,Shaowen Cao,Jiaguo Yu. MnCo Oxides Supported on Carbon Fibers for High-Performance Supercapacitors [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(7): 1907072-0.
[4]	Xinxin Cao,Jiang Zhou,Anqiang Pan,Shuquan Liang. Recent Advances in Phosphate Cathode Materials for Sodium-ion Batteries [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(5): 1905018-0.
[5]	Yao Chen,George Zheng Chen. New Precursors Derived Activated Carbon and Graphene for Aqueous Supercapacitors with Unequal Electrode Capacitances [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1904025-0.
[6]	Di Tian,Xiaofeng Lu,Weimo Li,Yue Li,Ce Wang. Research on Electrospun Nanofiber-Based Binder-Free Electrode Materials for Supercapacitors [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1904056-0.
[7]	Liping Kang,Gaini Zhang,Yunlong Bai,Huanjing Wang,Zhibin Lei,Zonghuai Liu. Two-Dimensional Nanosheet Hole Strategy and Their Assembled Materials for Supercapacitor Application [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1905032-0.
[8]	Jiayao Zhu, Yue Dong, Su Zhang, Zhuangjun Fan. Application of Carbon-/Graphene Quantum Dots for Supercapacitors [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1903052-0.
[9]	Yi Wang,Wangchen Huo,Xiaoya Yuan,Yuxin Zhang. Composite of Manganese Dioxide and Two-dimensional Materials Applied to Supercapacitors [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1904007-0.
[10]	Wenyi Liu,Linpo Li,Qiuyue Gui,Bohua Deng,Yuanyuan Li,Jinping Liu. Novel Hybrid Supercapacitors Based on Nanoarray Electrodes [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1904049-0.
[11]	Feng Wei,Honghui Bi,Shuai Jiao,Xiaojun He. Interconnected Graphene-like Nanosheets for Supercapacitors [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(2): 1903043-0.
[12]	Fan Xie, Ye Xi, Qingda Xu, Jingquan Liu. Utah Neural Electrode Technology for Brain-Computer Interface [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2020, 36(12): 2003014-0.
[13]	Kun Liu, Yao Liu, Haifeng Zhu, Xiaoli Dong, Yonggang Wang, Congxiao Wang, Yongyao Xia. NaTiSi₂O₆/C Composite as a Novel Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(11): 1912030-0.
[14]	Kang YANG,Xiaorui SHUAI,Huachao YANG,Jianhua YAN,Kefa CEN. Electrochemical Performance of Activated Graphene Powder Supercapacitors Using a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid Electrolyte [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(7): 755-765.
[15]	Shah Rahim,Alam Naveed,A. Razzaq Amir,Cheng YANG,Yujie CHEN,Jiapeng HU,Xiaohui ZHAO,Yang PENG,Zhao DENG. Effect of Binder Conformity on the Electrochemical Behavior of Graphite Anodes with Different Particle Shapes [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(12): 1382-1390.

Application of Plant-Based Porous Carbon for Supercapacitors

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 155

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0