温度对乙醇电催化氧化的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

Abstract

Abstract:

The electrocatalytic activity of commercial Pt/C for ethanol oxidation is relatively low, and the C―C bond is difficult to break. Thus, the complete oxidation process is not easy, and the fuel utilization efficiency becomes considerably reduced. Increasing the temperature can increase the reaction rate and enhance the mass transport; therefore, a temperature-controlled electrode was used during our in situ FTIRS (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) investigation. The temperature sensor was placed at a certain distance from the surface of the electrode; thus, the surface temperature needed to be corrected. The temperature was calibrated using the "potentiometric" measurement method, which was because the potential-temperature coefficient of the redox couple is constant under certain conditions, and the electrode surface temperature was obtained by potential conversion at different temperatures during the experiment. The experimental results showed that the relationship between the heating temperature, T_h, and the surface temperature, T_S, was T_S = 0.57T_h + 7.71 (30 ℃ < T_h ≤ 50 ℃) and T_S = 0.62T_h + 5.12 (50 ℃ < T_h ≤ 80 ℃), and according to error analysis, the maximum error was 1 ℃. The temperature-controlled electrode was applied to investigate the electrooxidation of ethanol using both in situ FTIRS and cyclic voltammetry using a commercial Pt/C catalyst at different temperatures. Clearly, based on the CV curve for the oxidation of ethanol, with increasing temperature, the overall oxidation current increased, and the onset potential and peak potential both negatively shifted, indicating that thermal activation allows the oxidation reaction to proceed easier. Electrooxidation of ethanol showed two positive oxidation peaks, and the ratio of the first peak current to the second peak current was used to qualitatively evaluate the selectivity of CO₂. Compared with at 25 ℃, the first peak current increased by 30% at 65 ℃, indicating that the high temperature was conducive to C―C bond cleavage. Comparing the in situ FTIRS recorded at 50 ℃, 35 ℃, and 25 ℃, we found that the onset potential of CO₂ on the commercial Pt/C catalyst was lower by 200 mV, indicating that Pt/C can provide oxygen-containing species at lower potentials at high temperature; however, the onset potentials of CH₃CHO and CH₃COOH did not change with temperature. The CO₂ selectivity was semi-quantitatively calculated by the area of CO₂ compared with the area of CH₃COOH from the FTIRS data. It was found that CO₂ had the highest selectivity at high temperature and low potential, indicating that high temperature is conducive to complete ethanol oxidation during CO₂ formation, possibly because both the ethanol bridge adsorption pattern and adsorbed OH (OH_ad) increased with temperature, enhancing subsequent CO_ad and OH_ad oxidation reactions. The low selectivity of CO₂ at the high potential was due to the adsorption of oxygen-containing species that occupied the surface-active site, blocking the adsorption of ethanol.

Key words: Temperature controlled electrode, "Potentiometric" measurement, In situ FTIRS, Ethanol, Electrocatalysis

MSC2000:

O646

Kunfang Tu, Guang Li, Yanxia Jiang. Effect of Temperature on the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Ethanol[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2020, 36(8): 1906026.

0
/ In situ FTIRS|Ethanol|Electrocatalysis”. Please open it by linking:http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/abstract/abstract35222.shtml" name="neirong"> In situ FTIRS|Ethanol|Electrocatalysis">

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201906026

http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V36/I8/1906026

Figures/Tables 12

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Table 1

Fig 6

Table 2

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

References 25

1	Chen X. B. ; Li C. ; Gratzel M. ; Kostecki R. ; Mao S. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7909. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35230C
2	Antolini E. J. Power Sources 2007, 170, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.009
3	An L. ; Zhao T. S. ; Li Y. S. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev 2015, 50, 1462. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.074
4	Yajima T. ; Uchida H. ; Watanabe M. J. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (8), 2654. doi: 10.1021/jp037215q
5	Ye J. Y. ; Jiang Y. X. ; Sheng T. ; Sun S. G. Nano Energy 2016, 29, 414. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.023
6	Watanabe M. ; Sato T. ; Kunimatsu K. ; Uchida H. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53 (23), 6928. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.023
7	Wang J. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 396, 33. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00355-4
8	Zhou Z. Y. ; Wang Q. ; Lin J. L. ; Tian N. ; Sun S. G. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55 (27), 7995. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.071
9	Jenkins D. M. ; Song C. Y. ; Fares S. ; Cheng H. ; Barrettino D. Sens Actu B: Chem. 2009, 137, 222. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2008.09.046
10	Compton R. G. ; Coles B. A. ; Marken F. Chem. Commun 1998, 2595, 2595. doi: 10.1039/A806511J
11	Yuan Q. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Zhuang J. ; Wang X. Chem. Mater 2010, 22, 2395. doi: 10.1021/cm903844t
12	Hitmi H. ; Belgsir E. M. ; Léger J. M. ; Lamy C. ; Lezna R. O. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 407. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)80080-4
13	Rao L. ; Jiang Y. X. ; Zhang B. W. ; Cai Y. R. ; Sun S. G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 13662. doi: 10.1039/C3CP55059A
14	Iwasita T. ; Pastor E. Electrochim. Acta 1994, 39, 531. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(94)80097-9
15	Rasch B. ; Iwasita T. Electrochim. Acta 1990, 35, 989. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(90)90032-U
16	Colmati F. ; Tremiliosi-Filho G. ; Gonzalez E. R. ; Berná A. ; Herrero E. ; Feliu ; J M. Faraday Discuss 2008, 140, 379. doi: 10.1039/B802160K
17	Liu H. X. ; Tian N. ; Brandon M. P. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Lin J. L. ; Hardacre C. ; Lin W. F. ; Sun S. G. ACS Catal 2012, 2, 708. doi: 10.1021/cs200686a
18	Lu G. Q. ; Sun S. G. ; Cai L. R. ; Chen S. P. ; Tian Z. W. Langmuir 2000, 16, 778. doi: 10.1021/la990282k
19	Tian N. ; Xiao J. ; Zhou Z. Y. ; Liu H. X. ; Xu B. B. ; Sun S. G. Faraday Discuss. 2013, 162, 77. doi: 10.1039/C3FD20146E
20	Ghumman A. ; Pickup P. G. J. Power Sources 2008, 179, 280. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.071
21	Rao V. ; Cremers C. ; Stimming U. J. Eletrochem. Soc 2007, 154, 1138. doi: 10.1149/1.2777108
22	Camara G.A. ; Iwasita T. J. Eletrochem. Soc. 2005, 578, 315. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.01.013
23	Severson M. W. ; Stuhlmann C. ; Villegas I. ; Weaver M. J. J. Chem Phys. 1995, 103, 9832. doi: 10.1063/1.469950
24	Zhang B. W. ; Sheng T. ; Wang Y. X. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (1), 892. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03021
25	Wang H. F ; Liu Z. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130 (33), 10996. doi: 10.1021/ja801648h

T/℃	j₁/(A?mg^?1)	j₂/(A?mg^?1)	j₁/j₂
25	0.372	0.444	0.838
35	0.626	0.628	0.997
45	0.985	0.866	1.137
55	1.328	1.082	1.227
65	1.666	1.286	1.295

Wavenumber/cm^?1	Assignment
2341–2345	O―C―O asymmetric stretching
2040–2060	linearly adsorbed CO_L
1713–1723	C―O stretching of acetaldehyde and acetic acid in solution
1640–1650 1274–1284	H―O―H bending coupling C―O stretching and OH deformation of acetic acid

[1]	Kaimin Hua, Xiaofang Liu, Baiyin Wei, Shunan Zhang, Hui Wang, Yuhan Sun. Research Progress Regarding Transition Metal-Catalyzed Carbonylations with CO₂/H₂ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2009098-0.
[2]	Xinjiang Cui, Feng Shi. Selective Conversion of CO₂ by Single-Site Catalysts [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2006080-0.
[3]	Yanqiu Wang, Zixin Zhong, Tangkang Liu, Guoliang Liu, Xinlin Hong. Cu@UiO-66 Derived Cu⁺-ZrO₂ Interfacial Sites for Efficient CO₂ Hydrogenation to Methanol [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2007089-0.
[4]	Congming Li, Kuo Chen, Xiaoyue Wang, Nan Xue, Hengquan Yang. Understanding the Role of Cu/ZnO Interaction in CO₂ Hydrogenation to Methanol [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2009101-0.
[5]	Yuan Zhou, Na Han, Yanguang Li. Recent Progress on Pd-based Nanomaterials for Electrochemical CO₂ Reduction [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(9): 2001041-0.
[6]	Menggang Li, Zhonghong Xia, Yarong Huang, Lu Tao, Yuguang Chao, Kun Yin, Wenxiu Yang, Weiwei Yang, Yongsheng Yu, Shaojun Guo. Rh-Doped PdCu Ordered Intermetallics for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysis with Superior Methanol Tolerance [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(9): 1912049-0.
[7]	Xiaolong Tang,Shenghui Zhang,Jing Yu,Chunxiao Lü,Yuqing Chi,Junwei Sun,Yu Song,Ding Yuan,Zhaoli Ma,Lixue Zhang. Preparation of Platinum Catalysts on Porous Titanium Nitride Supports by Atomic Layer Deposition and Their Catalytic Performance for Oxygen Reduction Reaction [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(7): 1906070-0.
[8]	Zhenmin Xu, Zhenfeng Bian. Photocatalytic Methane Conversion [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2020, 36(3): 1907013-0.
[9]	Hanlin Lyu, Bing Hu, Guoliang Liu, Xinlin Hong, Lin Zhuang. Inverse Decoration of ZnO on Small-Sized Cu/Sio₂ with Controllable Cu-ZnO Interaction for CO₂ Hydrogenation to Produce Methanol [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(11): 1911008-0.
[10]	Jingxuan Ge, Jun Hu, Yingting Zhu, Zonish Zeb, Dejin Zang, Zhaoxian Qin, Yichao Huang, Jiangwei Zhang, Yongge Wei. Recent Advances in Polyoxometalates for Applications in Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(1): 1906063-0.
[11]	Shuyi ZHANG,Jingxian BAO,Bo WU,Liangshu ZHONG,Yuhan SUN. Research Progress on the Photocatalytic Conversion of Methane and Methanol [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 923-939.
[12]	Jincheng GUO,Yanfen LIN,Na TIAN,Shigang SUN. Modification of Tetrahexahedral Pd Nanocrystals with Ru and Their Performance for Methanol Electro-oxidation [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(7): 749-754.
[13]	Xiaodong YANG,Chi CHEN,Zhiyou ZHOU,Shigang SUN. Advances in Active Site Structure of Carbon-Based Non-Precious Metal Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(5): 472-485.
[14]	Zhou LIN,Linfan SHEN,Ximing QU,Junming ZHANG,Yanxia JIANG,Shigang SUN. Molybdenum Carbide Prepared by a Salt Sealing Approach as an Electrocatalyst for Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Reaction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(5): 523-530.
[15]	Yazhi YIN,Bing HU,Guoliang LIU,Xiaohai ZHOU,Xinlin HONG. ZnO@ZIF-8 Core-Shell Structure as Host for Highly Selective and Stable Pd/ZnO Catalysts for Hydrogenation of CO₂ to Methanol [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(3): 327-336.

Effect of Temperature on the Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Ethanol

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0