均匀电场对冰晶结构及生长的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201405095

Abstract

Abstract:

Homogeneous crystallization of supercooled water under electric field with strength ranging from 4.0 to 40.0 V·nm^-1 was investigated by using molecular simulation technique. The liquid-solid transition was successfully obtained based on ice component analysis using the CHILL algorithm. The analysis suggested that the produced crystalline was cubic ice dominant. The influence of the field strength on the structure and the growth rate of the ice was studied. The results revealed that the presence of an electric field drove the system to crystallize rapidly into dense and distorted cubic ice. The density of the crystals increased as a function of the field strength, from 0.98 to 1.08 g·cm^-3. The growth rate of the ice nucleus increased along with the field strength according to the characteristic time derived from the Avrami equation which ranged from 0.254 to 5.513 ns. This type of acceleration can be partially attributed to the enhancement of the rotational dynamics of the water molecules. Moreover, by monitoring the formation history of the cubic ice, we found that the defective ice acted as a transition state linking the liquid water and the cubic ice.

Key words: Molecular dynamics simulation, Homogeneous electric field, Ice crystal structure, Growth rate of ice crystal, Defective ice molecule

MSC2000:

O643

ZHANG Xiang-Xiong, CHEN Min. Influence of Homogeneous Electric Field on the Structure and Growth of Ice[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2014, 30(7): 1208-1214.

References

(1) Sassen, K.; Liou, K. N.; Kinne, S.; Griffin, M. Science 1985, 227 (4685), 411. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4685.411
(2) Sun,W.; Xu, X. B.; Zhang, H.; Xu, C. X. Cryobiology 2008, 56 (1), 93. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.10.173
(3) Petersen, A.; Schneider, H.; Rau, G.; Glasmacher, B. Cryobiology 2006, 53 (2), 248. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2006.06.005
(4) Orlowska, M.; Havet, M.; Le-Bail, A. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42 (7), 879. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.03.015
(5) Wilen, L. Science 1993, 259 (5100), 1469. doi: 10.1126/science.259.5100.1469-a
(6) Laforte, J. L.;Allaire, M.A.; Laflamme, J. Atmos. Res. 1998, 46 (1-2), 143. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8095(97)00057-4
(7) Sun,W.; Zhong, C.; Huang, S. Y. Mol. Simul. 2005, 31 (8), 555. doi: 10.1080/0892702500138483
(8) Svishchev, I. M.; Kusalik, P. G. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 53 (14), 8815. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.R8815
(9) Svishchev, I. M.; Kusalik, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118 (3), 649. doi: 10.1021/ja951624l
(10) Svishchev, I. M.; Kusalik, P. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73 (7), 975. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.975
(11) Svishchev, I. M.; Kusalik, P. G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 239 (4-6), 349. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00464-F
(12) Zangi, R. J. Phys.: Condes. Matter 2004, 16 (45), S5371. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/16/45/005
(13) Suresh, S. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126 (20), 204705. doi: 10.1063/1.2722745
(14) Jung, D. H.; Yang, J. H.; Jhon, M. S. Chem. Phys. 1999, 244 (2-3), 331. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0104(99)00119-6
(15) Bartlett, J. T.; van den Heuval, A. P.; Mason, B. J. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 1963, 14 (5), 599. doi: 10.1007/BF01601267
(16) Latham, J.; Saunders, C. P. R. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1970, 96 (408), 257. doi: 10.1002/qj.49709640808
(17) Libbrecht, K. G.; Tanusheva, V. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81 (1), 176. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.176
(18) Libbrecht, K. G.; Crosby, T.; Swanson, M. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 240 (1), 241. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(01)02089-9
(19) Hu, H.; Hou, H.;Wang, B. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116 (37), 19773. doi: 10.1021/jp304266d
(20) Moore, E. B.; de la Llave, E.;Welke, K.; Scherlis, D.A.; Molinero, V. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12 (16), 4124. doi: 10.1039/b919724a
(21) Maerzke, K. A.; Siepmann, J. I. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114 (12), 4261. doi: 10.1021/jp9101477
(22) Bratko, D.; Daub, C. D.; Leung, K.; Luzar, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (9), 2504. doi: 10.1021/ja0659370
(23) Ge, Z. P.; Shi, Y. C.; Li, X. Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29 (8), 1655. [葛振朋, 石彦超, 李晓毅. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29 (8), 1655.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201305222
(24) Toney, M. F.; Howard, J. N.; Richer, J.; Borges, G. L.; Gordon, J. G.; Melroy, O. R.;Wiesler, D. G.; Yee, D.; Sorensen, L. B. Nature 1994, 368 (6470), 444. doi: 10.1038/368444a0
(25) Berendsen, H.; Grigera, J.; Straatsma, T. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91 (24), 6269. doi: 10.1021/j100308a038
(26) Fernandez, R. G.; Abascal, J. L. F.; Vega, C. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124 (14), 144506. doi: 10.1063/1.2183308
(27) Razul, M. S. G.; Kusalik, P. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134 (1), 014710. doi: 10.1063/1.3518984
(28) Vrbka, L.; Jungwirth, P. J. Mol. Liq. 2007, 134 (1-3), 64. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2006.12.011
(29) Jorgensen,W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R.W.; Klein, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79 (2), 926. doi: 10.1063/1.445869
(30) Vega, C.; McBride, C.; Sanz, E.; Abascal, J. L. F. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7 (7), 1450. doi: 10.1039/b418934e
(31) Abascal, J. L. F.; Sanz, E.; Fernandez, R. G.; Vega, C. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122 (23), 234511. doi: 10.1063/1.1931662
(32) Nada, H.; van der Eerden, J. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118 (16), 7401. doi: 10.1063/1.1562610
(33) Gavish, M.;Wang, J.; Eisenstein, M.; Lahav, M.; Leiserowitz, L. Science 1992, 256 (5058), 815. doi: 10.1126/science.1589763
(34) Gómez-Monivas, S.; Sáenz, J. J.; Calleja, M.; García, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91 (5), 056101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.056101
(35) Choi, Y. C.; Pak, C.; Kim, K. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124 (9), 094308. doi: 10.1063/1.2173259
(36) Plimpton, S. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117 (1), 1. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039
(37) Murdachaew, G.; Mundy, C. J.; Schenter, G. K.; Laino, T.; Hutter, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115 (23), 6046. doi: 10.1021/jp110481m
(38) Yan, J.; Patey, G. N. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2 (20), 2555. doi: 10.1021/jz201113m
(39) Bernal, J. D.; Fowler, R. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1933, 1 (8), 515. doi: 10.1063/1.1749327
(40) Errington, J. R.; Debenedetti, P. G. Nature 2001, 409 (6818), 318. doi: 10.1038/35053024
(41) Moore, E. B.; Molinero, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132 (24), 244504. doi: 10.1063/1.3451112
(42) Kashchiev, D. Nucleation: Basic Theory with Applications, 1st ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Boston, 2000; pp 377-390.
(43) Vrbka, L.; Jungwirth, P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95 (14), 148501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.148501
(44) Hu, X. H.; Elghobashi-Meinhardt, N.; Gembris, D.; Smith, J. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 134507. doi: 10.1063/1.3643077
(45) Ropp, J.; Lawrence, C.; Farrar, T. C.; Skinner, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123 (33), 8047. doi: 10.1021/ja010312h
(46) Moore, E. B.; Molinero, V. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13 (44), 20008. doi: 10.1039/c1cp22022e

[1]	Tao ZHANG,Yunguang QIU,Qichao LUO,Xi CHENG,Lifen ZHAO,Xin YAN,Bo PENG,Hualiang JIANG,Huaiyu YANG. Concentration Dependent Effects of Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ on the Phosphatidylethanolamine-Phosphatidylglycerol Bilayer [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(8): 840-849.
[2]	Xiejun XU,Xingqing XIAO,Shouhong XU,Honglai LIU. Computational Study of Thermosensitivity of Liposomes Modulated by Leucine Zipper-Structured Lipopeptides [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(6): 598-606.
[3]	Kangjie LYU,Yanqiu PENG,Li XIAO,Juntao LU,Lin ZHUANG. Atomistic Understanding of the Peculiar Dissolution Behavior of Alkaline Polymer Electrolytes in Alcohol/Water Mixed Solvents [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(4): 378-384.
[4]	Huachao YANG,Zheng BO,Xiaorui SHUAI,Jianhua YAN,Kefa CEN. Influence of Wettability on the Charging Dynamics of Electric Double-Layer Capacitors [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(2): 200-207.
[5]	Wenqiong CHEN,Yongji GUAN,Xiaoping ZHANG,Youquan DENG. Influence of External Electric Field on Vibrational Spectrum of Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids Probed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(8): 912-919.
[6]	Fu-Feng LIU,Yu-Bo FAN,Zhen LIU,Shu BAI. Molecular Mechanism Underlying Affinity Interactions between Z_Aβ3 and the A_β16-40 Monomer [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(9): 1905-1914.
[7]	Liao-Ran CAO,Chun-Yu ZHANG,Ding-Lin ZHANG,Hui-Ying CHU,Yue-Bin ZHANG,Guo-Hui LI. Recent Developments in Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation Techniques to Study Biomolecules [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(7): 1354-1365.
[8]	Fang CHEN,Yuan-Yuan LIU,Jian-Long WANG,Ning-Ning Su,Li-Jie LI,Hong-Chun CHEN. Investigation of the Co-Solvent Effect on the Crystal Morphology of β-HMX using Molecular Dynamics Simulations [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(6): 1140-1148.
[9]	Yi-Jian CHEN,Hong-Tao ZHOU,Ji-Jiang GE,Gui-Ying XU. Aggregation Behavior of Double-Chained Anionic Surfactant 1-C_m-C₉-SO₃Na at Air/Liquid Interface: Molecular Dynamics Simulation [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(6): 1214-1222.
[10]	Qing-Kang LIU,Wen-Ping SONG,Qi-Tao HUANG,Guang-Yu ZHANG,Zhen-Xiu HOU. ReaxFF Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Oxidation of Silicon-doped Amorphous Carbon Film in Heat-assisted Magnetic Recording [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(12): 2472-2479.
[11]	Yi-Ran SUN,Fei YU,Jie MA. Research Progress of Nanoconfined Water [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2017, 33(11): 2173-2183.
[12]	Shao-Gui WU,Dan FENG. Free Energy Calculation for Base Pair Dissociation in a DNA Duplex [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2016, 32(5): 1282-1288.
[13]	Zi-Yu LIU,Qi LIAO,Zhi-Qiang JIN,Lei ZHANG,Lu ZHANG. Effect of Electrolytes on the Interfacial Behavior of Nonionic-Anionic Surfactant Solutions Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2016, 32(5): 1168-1174.
[14]	Wei XIE,Ze-Ren XU,Ming WANG,Si-Chuan XU. Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Levo-Benzedrine to Transmit through Molecular Channels within D₃R [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2016, 32(4): 907-920.
[15]	Qing LI,Deng-Feng YANG,Jian-Hua WANG,Qi WU,Qing-Zhi LIU. Biomimetic Modification and Desalination Behavior of (15, 15) Carbon Nanotubes with a Diameter Larger than 2 nm [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2016, 32(3): 691-700.

Influence of Homogeneous Electric Field on the Structure and Growth of Ice

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10