过渡金属参与C―H键切断模式的理论研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810052

Abstract

Abstract:

Transition-metal-catalyzed C―H bond activation, which has been widely applied to construct new covalent bonds, has emerged as one of the most effective strategies in synthetic chemistry due to atom economy and simple procedure. In this review, we have summarized the recent reports on the theoretical mechanistic study of transition-metal-catalyzed C―H bond cleavage. Based on these comprehensive theoretical studies, we have systematically discussed the general modes of C―H bond activation, which involves oxidative addition, base-assisted deprotonation, σ-metathesis, Friedel-Crafts-type electrophilic aromatic substitution, α- or β-hydrogen elimination, and hydrogen atom abstraction. From a mechanistic point of view, C―H bond activation by oxidative addition generally involves a zero-valent transition metal catalyst with strong reducibility, which requires a low activation barrier. The concerted metalation-deprotonation (CMD)-type C―H bond cleavage often occurs via a six-membered cyclic transition state using transition metal carboxylate as the catalyst with a directing group, which is a common mechanism for transition metals with high oxidation states. Base-assisted internal electrophilic substitution (BIES)-type C―H bond activation is commonly performed in the presence of cationic transition metal catalysts, in which electron-rich arenes react preferentially compared to electron-deficient arenes. In some other cases, outer-sphere base-assisted deprotonation can also result in C―H activation, which is dependent on the strength of the base used. The stronger the base used, the lower the energy barrier, and thus, the easier it is to protonate. The σ-metathesis pathway, which could occur via a four-membered cyclic transition state, is often considered an alternative for concerted metalation-deprotonation. If the aromatic hydrocarbon is attacked by electrophiles, the C―H bond can be activated by Friedel-Crafts-type electrophilic aromatic substitution. Elimination of α- or β-hydrogen is also frequently proposed for transition-metal-catalyzed C―H functionalization. Hydrogen atom abstraction could achieve C―H bond activation via a free radical process. Moreover, the C―H bonds of hydrocarbons can be considered weak nucleophiles because the electronegativity of carbon is higher than that of hydrogen, and they could be converted to strong nucleophiles (C―M) in the presence of transition metal catalysts via the different pathways mentioned above. It enables further functionalization with electrophiles or nucleophiles to construct complex molecular skeletons. Summarizing the general modes of C―H bond activation will increase our understanding of the associated chemical mechanism and will pave the way for new synthetic strategies. This review aims to offer theoretical guidance for experimental studies and inspire new reaction design by summarizing the modes of transition-metal-catalyzed C―H bond activation.

Key words: Transition metal, C―H bond cleavage, Theoretical study, Mechanism, Concerted metalation-deprotonation

Chunhui SHAN,Ruopeng BAI,Yu LAN. Theoretical Advances of Transition Metals Mediated C―H Bonds Cleavage[J].Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 940-953.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14

Fig 15

Fig 16

Fig 17

References 109

1	Ackermann L. Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 1315. doi: 10.1021/cr100412j
2	Cho S. H. ; Kim J. Y. ; Kwak J. ; Chang S. Chem. Soc. Rev 2011, 40, 5068. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15082k
3	Jiang Y. -Y. ; Man X. ; Bi S. Sci. China-Chem. 2016, 59, 1448. doi: 10.1007/s11426-016-0330-3
4	Liu C. ; Zhang H. ; Shi W. ; Lei A. Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 1780. doi: 10.1021/cr100379j
5	Rao Y. ; Shan G. ; Yang X. Sci. China-Chem 2014, 57, 930. doi: 10.1007/s11426-014-5130-y
6	Shan C. ; Zhu L. ; Qu L. B. ; Bai R. ; Lan Y. Chem. Soc. Rev 2018, 47, 7552. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00036k
7	Yu J. L. ; Zhang S. Q. ; Hong X. J. Am. Chem.Soc 2017, 139, 7224. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00714
8	Yuan C. ; Zhu L. ; Chen C. ; Chen X. ; Yang Y. ; Lan Y. ; Zhao Y. Nat. Commun 2018, 9, 1189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03341-6
9	Yuan C. ; Zhu L. ; Zeng R. ; Lan Y. ; Zhao Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 1277. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711221
10	Zhang L. ; Zhu L. ; Zhang Y. ; Yang Y. ; Wu Y. ; Ma W. ; Lan Y. ; You J. ACS Catal 2018, 8, 8324. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02816
11	Ackermann L. Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 281. doi: 10.1021/ar3002798
12	Colby D. A. ; Bergman R. G. ; Ellman J. A. Chem. Rev 2010, 110, 624. doi: 10.1021/cr900005n
13	Li Y. ; Liu S. ; Qi Z. ; Qi X. ; Li X. ; Lan Y. Chem. -Eur. J 2015, 21, 10131. doi: 10.1002/chem.201500290
14	Qin X. ; Li X. ; Huang Q. ; Liu H. ; Wu D. ; Guo Q. ; Lan J. ; Wang R. ; You J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 7167. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501982
15	Shin K. ; Kim H. ; Chang S. Acc. Chem. Res 2015, 48, 1040. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00020
16	Song G. ; Li X. Acc. Chem. Res 2015, 48, 1007. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00077
17	Yu S. ; Li Y. ; Kong L. ; Zhou X. ; Tang G. ; Lan Y. ; Li X. ACS Catal 2016, 6, 7744. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02668
18	Yu S. ; Liu S. ; Lan Y. ; Wan B. ; Li X. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 1623. doi: 10.1021/ja511796h
19	Arroniz C. ; Denis J. G. ; Ironmonger A. ; Rassias G. ; Larrosa I. Chem. Sci 2014, 5, 3509. doi: 10.1039/c4sc01215a
20	Arroniz C. ; Ironmonger A. ; Rassias G. ; Larrosa I. Org. Lett 2013, 15, 910. doi: 10.1021/ol400065j
21	Chiong H. A. ; Pham Q. N. ; Daugulis O. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 9879. doi: 10.1021/ja071845e
22	Engle K. M. ; Mei T. S. ; Wasa M. ; Yu J. Q. Acc. Chem. Res 2012, 45, 788. doi: 10.1021/ar200185g
23	Giri R. ; Maugel N. ; Li J. J. ; Wang D. H. ; Breazzano S. P. ; Saunders L. B. ; Yu J. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 3510. doi: 10.1021/ja0701614
24	He J. ; Wasa M. ; Chan K. S. L. ; Shao Q. ; Yu J. Q. Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 8754. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00622
25	Wang D. H. ; Mei T. S. ; Yu J. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 17676. doi: 10.1021/ja806681z
26	Zhang H. ; Wang H.-Y. ; Luo Y. ; Chen C. ; Cao Y. ; Chen P. ; Guo Y. -L. ; Lan Y. ; Liu G. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2173. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03220
27	Zhu C. ; Zhang Y. ; Kan J. ; Zhao H. ; Su W. Org. Lett 2015, 17, 3418. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01398
28	Shi R. ; Lu L. ; Xie H. ; Yan J. ; Xu T. ; Zhang H. ; Qi X. ; Lan Y. ; Lei A. Chem. Commun 2016, 52, 13307. doi: 10.1039/c6cc06358f
29	Song L. ; Zhu L. ; Zhang Z. ; Ye J. H. ; Yan S. S. ; Han J. L. ; Yin Z. B. ; Lan Y. ; Yu D. G. Org. Lett 2018, 20, 3776. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01363
30	Zhu R.-Y. ; Farmer M. E. ; Chen Y. -Q. ; Yu J. -Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10578. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600791
31	Musaev D. G. ; Figg T. M. ; Kaledin A. L. Chem. Soc. Rev 2014, 43, 5009. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60447k
32	Xie H. ; Fan T. ; Lei Q. ; Fang W. Sci. Chin. Chem 2016, 59, 1432. doi: 10.1007/s11426-016-0018-2
33	Xie H. ; Zhang H. ; Lin Z. New J. Chem 2013, 37, 2856. doi: 10.1039/c3nj00531c
34	Liu D. ; Li Y. ; Qi X. ; Liu C. ; Lan Y. ; Lei A. Org. Lett 2015, 17, 998. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00104
35	Aihara Y. ; Chatani N. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 898. doi: 10.1021/ja411715v
36	Heitz D. R. ; Tellis J. C. ; Molander G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 12715. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04789
37	Muto K. ; Yamaguchi J. ; Itami K. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 169. doi: 10.1021/ja210249h
38	Yamamoto T. ; Muto K. ; Komiyama M. ; Canivet J. ; Yamaguchi J. ; Itami K. Chem. -Eur. J 2011, 17, 10113. doi: 10.1002/chem.201101091
39	Yokota A. ; Aihara Y. ; Chatani N. J. Org. Chem 2014, 79, 11922. doi: 10.1021/jo501697n
40	Liu R. R. ; Zhu L. ; Hu J. P. ; Lu C. J. ; Gao J. R. ; Lan Y. ; Jia Y. X. Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 5890. doi: 10.1039/c7cc01015j
41	Zeng Z. ; Zhang T. ; Yue X. ; Zhang H. ; Bai R. ; Lan Y. Sci. Sin. Chim 2018, 48, 736. doi: 10.1360/N032018-00105
42	Murai S. ; Kakiuchi F. ; Sekine S. ; Tanaka Y. ; Kamatani A. ; Sonoda M. ; Chatani N. Nature 1993, 366, 529. doi: 10.1038/366529a0
43	Ackermann L. Chem. Commun 2010, 46, 4866. doi: 10.1039/c0cc00778a
44	Ackermann L. ; Hofmann N. ; Vicente R. Org. Lett 2011, 13, 1875. doi: 10.1021/ol200366n
45	Ackermann L. ; Vicente R. ; Althammer A. Org. Lett 2008, 10, 2299. doi: 10.1021/ol800773x
46	Fumagalli F. ; Warratz S. ; Zhang S. K. ; Rogge T. ; Zhu C. ; Stuckl A. C. ; Ackermann L. Chem. -Eur. J 2018, 24, 3984. doi: 10.1002/chem.201800530
47	Liu W. ; Ackermann L. Org. Lett 2013, 15, 3484. doi: 10.1021/ol401535k
48	Warratz S. ; Burns D. J. ; Zhu C. ; Korvorapun K. ; Rogge T. ; Scholz J. ; Jooss C. ; Gelman D. ; Ackermann L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 1557. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609014
49	Ferrer Flegeau E. ; Bruneau C. ; Dixneuf P. H. ; Jutand A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 10161. doi: 10.1021/ja201462n
50	Ozdemir I. ; Demir S. ; Cetinkaya B. ; Gourlaouen C. ; Maseras F. ; Bruneau C. ; Dixneuf P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 1156. doi: 10.1021/ja710276x
51	Ryabov A. D. ; Sakodinskaya I. K. ; Yatsimirsky A. K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans 1985, 2629 doi: 10.1039/dt9850002629
52	Kurzeev S. A. ; Kazankov G. M. ; Ryabov A. D. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 340, 192. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1693[02]01148-9
53	Oxgaard J. ; Tenn W. J. ; Nielsen R. J. ; Periana R. A. ; Goddard W. A. Organometallics 2007, 26, 1565. doi: 10.1021/om061189b
54	Balcells D. ; Clot E. ; Eisenstein O. Chem. Rev 2010, 110, 749. doi: 10.1021/cr900315k
55	Wenz K. M. ; Liu P. ; Houk K. N. Organometallics 2017, 36, 3613. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00531
56	Xi Y. ; Su Y. ; Yu Z. ; Dong B. ; McClain E. J. ; Lan Y. ; Shi X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 9817. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404946
57	Shi F. Q. Org. Lett 2011, 13, 736. doi: 10.1021/ol102974k
58	Cho K. B. ; Kang H. ; Woo J. ; Park Y. J. ; Seo M. S. ; Cho J. ; Nam W. Inorg. Chem 2014, 53, 645. doi: 10.1021/ic402831f
59	Sun X. ; Sun X. ; Geng C. ; Zhao H. ; Li J. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2014, 118, 7146. doi: 10.1021/jp505662x
60	Tamura H. ; Yamazaki H. ; Sato H. ; Sakaki S. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125, 16114. doi: 10.1021/ja0302937
61	Zhu L. ; Qi X. ; Li Y. ; Duan M. ; Zou L. ; Bai R. ; Lan Y. Organometallics 2017, 36, 2107. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00151
62	Murphy S. K. ; Park J. W. ; Cruz F. A. ; Dong V. M. Science 2015, 347, 56. doi: 10.1126/science.1261232
63	Luo X. ; Bai R. ; Liu S. ; Shan C. ; Chen C. ; Lan Y. J. Org. Chem 2016, 81, 2320. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b02828
64	Gorelsky S. I. ; Lapointe D. ; Fagnou K. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 10848. doi: 10.1021/ja802533u
65	Wang Q. ; Li Y. ; Qi Z. ; Xie F. ; Lan Y. ; Li X. ACS Catal 2016, 6, 1971. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02297
66	Yu S. ; Tang G. ; Li Y. ; Zhou X. ; Lan Y. ; Li X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 8696. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602224
67	Dateer R. B. ; Chang S. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 4908. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01065
68	Li Y. ; Shan C. ; Yang Y. F. ; Shi F. ; Qi X. ; Houk K. N. ; Lan Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 4496. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b01020
69	Liu S. ; Qi X. ; Qu L. -B. ; Bai R. ; Lan Y. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 1645. doi: 10.1039/c7cy02367g
70	Luo Y. ; Liu S. ; Xu D. ; Qu L. -B. ; Luo X. ; Bai R. ; Lan Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 864, 148. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2018.03.016
71	Tan G. ; Zhu L. ; Liao X. ; Lan Y. ; You J. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 15724. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07242
72	Yang X. ; Liu S. ; Yu S. ; Kong L. ; Lan Y. ; Li X. Org. Lett 2018, 20, 2698. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00906
73	Yin J. ; Zhou F. ; Zhu L. ; Yang M. ; Lan Y. ; You J. Chem. Sci 2018, 9, 5488. doi: 10.1039/c8sc01963k
74	Zhang T. ; Qi X. ; Liu S. ; Bai R. ; Liu C. ; Lan Y. Chem. -Eur. J 2017, 23, 2690. doi: 10.1002/chem.201605188
75	Qi X. ; Li Y. ; Bai R. ; Lan Y. Acc. Chem. Res 2017, 50, 2799. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00400
76	Gao B. ; Liu S. ; Lan Y. ; Huang H. Organometallics 2016, 35, 1480. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00072
77	Shan C. ; Luo X. ; Qi X. ; Liu S. ; Li Y. ; Lan Y. Organometallics 2016, 35, 1440. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00064
78	Zhou X. ; Luo Y. ; Kong L. ; Xu Y. ; Zheng G. ; Lan Y. ; Li X. ACS Catal 2017, 7, 7296. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02248
79	Li Y. ; Zou L. ; Bai R. ; Lan Y. Org. Chem. Front 2018, 5, 615. doi: 10.1039/c7qo00850c
80	Zell D. ; Bursch M. ; Muller V. ; Grimme S. ; Ackermann L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 10378. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704196
81	Bu Q. ; Rogge T. ; Kotek V. ; Ackermann L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 765. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711108
82	Yue X. ; Qi X. ; Bai R. ; Lei A. ; Lan Y. Chem. -Eur. J 2017, 23, 6419. doi: 10.1002/chem.201700733
83	Lin Y. ; Zhu L. ; Lan Y. ; Rao Y. Chem. -Eur. J 2015, 21, 14937. doi: 10.1002/chem.201502140
84	Ahmad K. ; Khan B. A. ; Roy S. K. ; Zai-ul A. ; Mahmood R. ; Khan J. ; Ashraf H. Comput. Theor. Chem 2018, 1130, 140. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2018.03.025
85	Clot E. ; Chen J. ; Lee D. H. ; Sung S. Y. ; Appelhans L. N. ; Faller J. W. ; Crabtree R. H. ; Eisenstein O. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 8795. doi: 10.1021/ja048473j
86	Chen Z. M. ; Hilton M. J. ; Sigman M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 11461. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06994
87	Werner E. W. ; Mei T. S. ; Burckle A. J. ; Sigman M. S. Science 2012, 338, 1455. doi: 10.1126/science.1229208
88	Xu L. ; Hilton M. J. ; Zhang X. ; Norrby P. O. ; Wu Y. D. ; Sigman M. S. ; Wiest O. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 1960. doi: 10.1021/ja4109616
89	Limberg C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2003, 42, 5932. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300578
90	Che C. M. ; Lo V. K. ; Zhou C. Y. ; Huang J. S. Chem. Soc. Rev 2011, 40, 1950. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00142b
91	Zhang L. ; Liu Y. ; Deng L. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 15525. doi: 10.1021/ja509731z
92	Hu L. ; Chen H. ACS Catal 2016, 7, 285. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02694
93	Maurice D. ; Head-Gordon M. Mol. Phys 1999, 96, 1533. doi: 10.1080/00268979909483096
94	Head-Gordon M. ; Rico R. J. ; Oumi M. ; Lee T. J. Chem. Phys. Lett 1994, 219, 21. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614[94]00070-0
95	Purvis G. D. ; Bartlett R. J. J. Chem. Phys 1982, 76, 1910. doi: 10.1063/1.443164
96	Krishnan R. ; Pople J. A. Int. J.Quantum Chem 1978, 14, 91. doi: 10.1002/qua.560140109
97	Van Voorhis T. ; Head-Gordon M. J. Chem. Phys 2001, 115, 5033. doi: 10.1063/1.1390516
98	Meyer H. D. ; Manthe U. ; Cederbaum L. S. Chem. Phys. Lett 1990, 165, 73. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614[90]87014-i
99	M ller C. ; Plesset M. S. Phys. Rev 1934, 46, 618. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.46.618
100	Grimme S. J. Comput. Chem 2004, 25, 1463. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20078
101	Zhao Y. ; Schultz N. E. ; Truhlar D. G. J. Chem. Theory Comput 2006, 2, 364. doi: 10.1021/ct0502763
102	Becke A. D. J. Chem. Phys 1993, 98, 5648. doi: 10.1063/1.464913
103	Lee C. ; Yang W. ; Parr R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
104	Goerigk L. ; Grimme S. J. Chem. Theory Comput 2011, 7, 291. doi: 10.1021/ct100466k
105	Grimme S. ; Antony J. ; Ehrlich S. ; Krieg H. J. Chem. Phys 2010, 132, 154104. doi: 10.1063/1.3382344
106	Zhao Y. ; Truhlar D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc 2008, 119, 525. doi: 10.1007/s00214-007-0401-8
107	Peverati R. ; Truhlar D. G. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 2011, 3, 117. doi: 10.1021/jz201525m
108	Peverati R. ; Truhlar D. G. J. Chem. Theory Comput 2012, 8, 2310. doi: 10.1021/ct3002656
109	Zhao Y. ; Truhlar D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 5656. doi: 10.1021/jp050536c

[1]	Dong Liu, Shengtao Chen, Renjie Li, Tianyou Peng. Review of Z-Scheme Heterojunctions for Photocatalytic Energy Conversion [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(6): 2010017-0.
[2]	Kaimin Hua, Xiaofang Liu, Baiyin Wei, Shunan Zhang, Hui Wang, Yuhan Sun. Research Progress Regarding Transition Metal-Catalyzed Carbonylations with CO₂/H₂ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(5): 2009098-0.
[3]	Yongli Heng, Zhenyi Gu, Jinzhi Guo, Xinglong Wu. Research Progresses on Vanadium-Based Cathode Materials for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(3): 2005013-0.
[4]	Xinyang Yue, Cui Ma, Jian Bao, Siyu Yang, Dong Chen, Xiaojing Wu, Yongning Zhou. Failure Mechanisms of Lithium Metal Anode and Their Advanced Characterization Technologies [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(2): 2005012-0.
[5]	Xiaoguang Qiu, Wei Liu, Jiuding Liu, Junzhi Li, Kai Zhang, Fangyi Cheng. Nucleation Mechanism and Substrate Modification of Lithium Metal Anode [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(1): 2009012-0.
[6]	Bin Cao,Xifei Li. Recent Progress on Carbon-based Anode Materials for Na-ion Batteries [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(5): 1905003-0.
[7]	Hui Li,Shuangyu Liu,Tianci Yuan,Bo Wang,Peng Sheng,Li Xu,Guangyao Zhao,Huitao Bai,Xin Chen,Zhongxue Chen,Yuliang Cao. Electrochemical Mechanism of Na_0.44MnO₂ in Alkaline Aqueous Solution [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(5): 1905027-0.
[8]	Xiaolong Liu, Qiang Wang, Chao Wang, Jun Xu, Feng Deng. Hydrogen-Bond Induced Crystallization of Silicalite-1 Zeolite as Revealed by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1905035-0.
[9]	Chao Li, Ming Shen, Bingwen Hu. Solid-State NMR and EPR Methods for Metal Ion Battery Research [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1902019-0.
[10]	Wencong Li, Jin Xu, Jie Shen, Juanjuan Liu, Yingjie Fan, Junlin Yang. Interdisciplinary Research Funding Mechanisms of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and Their Implications [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(11): 2008058-0.
[11]	Lifang Chen,Yulv Yu,Masako Kuwa,Tao Cheng,Yan Liu,Hiroshi Murakami,Harada Masafumi,Yuan Wang. Insight into the Formation Mechanism of "Unprotected" Metal Nanoclusters [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(1): 1907008-0.
[12]	Yuanyuan HU,Congyang WANG. Bimetallic C―H Activation in Homogeneous Catalysis [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 913-922.
[13]	Mengdi ZHAO,Wenjun LU. Alkanes Functionalization via C―H Activation [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 977-988.
[14]	Shihao CHEN,Ming WANG,Xuefeng JIANG. C―H Functionalization Strategies for the Construction of Thioethers [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 954-967.
[15]	Qiang CHEN,Li-Xue JIANG,Hai-Fang LI,Jiao-Jiao CHEN,Yan-Xia ZHAO,Sheng-Gui HE. Thermal Activation of Methane by Diatomic Vanadium Boride Cations [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 1014-1020.

Theoretical Advances of Transition Metals Mediated C―H Bonds Cleavage

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 109

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0