应用机器学习方法构建药物分子解离速率常数的预测模型

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201907006

Abstract

Abstract:

An increasing number of recent studies have shown that the binding kinetics of a drug molecule to its target correlates strongly with its efficacy in vivo. Therefore, ligand optimization oriented to improved binding kinetics provides new ideas for rational drug design. Currently, ligand binding kinetics is modeled mainly through extensive molecular dynamics simulations, which limits its application to real-world problems. The present study aimed at obtaining a general-purpose quantitative structure-kinetics relationship (QSKR) model for predicting the dissociation rate constant (k_off) of a ligand based on its complex structure. This type of model is expected to be suitable for high-throughput tasks in structure-based drug design. We collected the experimentally measured k_off values for 406 ligand molecules from literature, and then constructed a three-dimensional structural model for each protein-ligand complex through molecular modeling. A training set was compiled using 60% of those complexes while the remaining 40% were assigned to two test sets. Based on distance-dependent protein-ligand atom pair descriptors, a random forest algorithm was adopted to derive a QSKR model. Various random forest models were then generated based on the descriptor sets obtained under different conditions, such as distance cutoff, bin width, and feature selection criteria. The cross-validation results of those models were then examined. It was observed that the optimal model was obtained when the distance cutoff was 15 Å (1 Å = 0.1 nm), the bin width was 3 Å, and feature selection variance level was 2. The final QSKR model produced correlation coefficients around 0.62 on the two independent test sets. This level of accuracy is at least comparable to that of the predictive models described in literature, which are typically computationally much more expensive. Our study attempts to address the issue of predicting k_off values in drug design. We hope that it can provide inspiration for further studies by other researchers.

Key words: Dissociation rate constant, Ligand binding kinetics, Random forest model, Protein-ligand interaction, Structure-based drug design

MSC2000:

O641

Minyi Su,Huisi Liu,Haixia Lin,Renxiao Wang. Machine-Learning Model for Predicting the Rate Constant of ProteinLigand Dissociation[J].Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(1): 1907006.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Table 1

Fig 7

Table 2

Table 3

References 33

1	Copeland R. A. ; Pompliano D. L. ; Meek T. D. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 730. doi: 10.1038/nrd2082
2	Tummino P. J. ; Copeland R. A. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 5481. doi: 10.1021/bi8002023
3	Schuetz D. A. ; Arnout de Witte W. E. ; Wong Y. C. ; Knasmueller B. ; Richter L. ; Kokh D. B. ; Sadiq S. K. ; Bosma R. ; Nederpelt I. ; Heitman L. H. ; et al Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 896. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.02.002
4	Pan A. C. ; Borhani D. W. ; Dror R. O. ; Shaw D. E. Drug Discov. Today 2013, 18, 667. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.02.007
5	Guo D. ; Mulder K. T. ; Ijzerman A. P. ; Heitman L. H. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 166, 1846. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01897.x
6	Folmer R. H. A. Drug Discov. Today 2018, 23, 12. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.07.016
7	Bruce N. J. ; Ganotra G. K. ; Kokh D. B. ; Sadiq S. K. ; Wade R. C. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2018, 49, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.001
8	Qu S. J. ; Huang S. H. ; Pan X. C. ; Yang L. ; Mei H. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 2061. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00326
9	Ganotra G. K. ; Wade R. C. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 1134. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00397
10	Liu Z.H ; Li Y. ; Han L. ; Li J. ; Liu J. ; Zhao Z. X. ; Nie W. ; Liu Y. C ; Wang R. X. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 405. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu626
11	Li W. ; Godzik A. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1658. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158
12	Fu L. ; Niu B. ; Zhu Z. ; Wu S. ; Li W. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 3150. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565
13	Royston J. P. Appl. Stat. 1982, 31, 115. doi: 10.2307/2347973
14	Royston J. P. Appl. Stat. 1982, 31, 176. doi: 10.2307/2347986
15	Rogers D. ; Hahn M. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 742. doi: 10.1021/ci100050t
16	Bietz S. ; Urbaczek S. ; Schulz B. ; Rarey M. J. Cheminform. 2014, 6, 1. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-6-12
17	Friesner R. A. ; Banks J. L. ; Murphy R. B. ; Halgren T. A. ; Klicic J. J. ; Mainz D. T. ; Repasky M. P. ; Knoll E. H. ; Shelley M. ; Perry J. K. ; et al J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739. doi: 10.1021/jm0306430
18	Halgren T. A. ; Murphy R. B. ; Friesner R. A. ; Beard H. S. ; Frye L. L. ; Pollard W. T. ; Banks J. L. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750. doi: 10.1021/jm030644s
19	Friesner R. A. ; Murphy R. B. ; Repasky M. P. ; Frye L. L. ; Greenwood J. R. ; Halgren T. A. ; Sanschagrin P. C. ; Mainz D. T. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177. doi: 10.1021/jm051256o
20	Qiu D. ; Shenkin P. S. ; Hollinger F. P. ; Still W. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3005. doi: 10.1021/jp961992r
21	Case, D. A.; Babin, V.; Berryman, J. T.; Betz, R. M.; Cai, Q.; Cerutti, D. S.; Cheatham, T. E., Ⅲ; Darden, T. A.; Duke, R. E.; Gohlke, H.; Goetz, A. W.; et al. AMBER 2014; University of California: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2014.
22	Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016.
23	Cieplak P. ; Cornell W. D. ; Bayly C. ; Kollman P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1995, 16, 1357. doi: 10.1002/jcc.540161106
24	Maier J. A. ; Martinez C. ; Kasavajhala K. ; Wickstrom L. ; Hauser K. E. ; Simmerling C. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 3696. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255
25	Wang J. ; Wolf R. M. ; Caldwell J. W. ; Kollman P. A. ; Case D. A. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20035
26	Jorgensen W. L. ; Chandrasekhar J. ; Madura J. D. ; Impey R. W. ; Klein M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926. doi: 10.1063/1.445869
27	Ryckaert, J. P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 23, 327. doi: 10.1.1.399.6868
28	Roe D. R. ; Cheatham T. E. Ⅲ. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 3084. doi: 10.1021/ct400341p
29	Rudling A. ; Orro A. ; Carlsson J. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2018, 58, 350. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00520
30	Ballester P. J. ; Schreyer A. ; Blundell T. L. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 944. doi: 10.1021/ci500091r
31	Pedregosa F. ; Varoquaux G. ; Gramfort A. ; Michel V. ; Thirion B. ; Grisel O. ; Blondel M. ; Prettenhofer P. ; Weiss R. ; Dubourg V. ; et al J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011, 12, 2825.
32	Kennard R. W. ; Stone L. A. Technometrics 1969, 11, 137. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1969.10490666
33	Martin T. M. ; Harten P. ; Young D. M. ; Muratov E. N. ; Golbraikh A. ; Zhu H. ; Tropsha A. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 2570. doi: 10.1021/ci300338w

Distance cutoff /Å	Bin width/Å ^a
6	1, 2, 3, 6
9	1, 3, 9
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12
15	1, 3, 5, 15

Bin width/Å	Bin width/Å	Feature selection variance level
Bin width/Å	Bin width/Å	0	1	2
6	1	0.548	0.507	0.393
	2	0.524	0.406	0.304
	3	0.509	0.484	0.546
	6	0.496	0.526	0.519
9	1	0.507	0.437	0.408
	3	0.563	0.576	0.447
	9	0.511	0.551	0.482
12	1	0.557	0.436	0.489
	2	0.562	0.416	0.568
	3	0.526	0.504	0.619
	4	0.553	0.501	0.363
	6	0.461	0.626	0.536
	12	0.425	0.356	0.604
15	1	0.317	0.604	0.487
	3	0.573	0.551	0.671
	5	0.417	0.574	0.585
	15	0.569	0.532	0.585

Data set	R		RMSE
Data set	Model 1	Reference model	Model 1	Reference model
internal validation set	0.671	0.436	1.03	1.18
external test set	0.623	0.252	1.06	1.06
HSP90 test set	0.625	0.375	0.85	0.98

[1]	Miaomiao Liu, Wenjuan Wang, Xiuping Hao, Xiaoyan Dong. Seeding and Cross-Seeding Aggregations of Aβ40 and hIAPP in Solution and on Surface [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 0, (): 2002024-0.
[2]	Wei Zhou, Yunchao Li, Louzhen Fan, Xiaohong Li. Thioflavin T Specifically Binding with G-Quadruplex Flanked by Double-Stranded DNA [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 0, (): 2004017-0.
[3]	Jin-Liang Lin, Yamin Zhang, Hao-Li Zhang. Novel Electrostatic Effects in Single-Molecule Devices [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 0, (): 2005010-0.
[4]	Chengcheng Zhang, Ralph Crisci, Zhan Chen. Probing Molecular Structures of Antifouling Polymer/Liquid Interfaces In Situ [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(10): 1910003-0.
[5]	Yamei Yang, Huijie Lun, Lasheng Long, Xiangjian Kong, Lansun Zheng. Controlled Synthesis of Lanthanide-titanium Oxo Clusters EuTi₆, EuTi₇ and La₂Ti₁₄ [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(9): 1912007-0.
[6]	Chengfang Qiao,Lei Lü,Wenfeng Xu,Zhengqiang Xia,Chunsheng Zhou,Sanping Chen,Shengli Gao. Synthesis, Thermal Decomposition Kinetics and Detonation Performance of a Three-Dimensional Solvent-Free Energetic Ag(I)-MOF [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(6): 1905085-0.
[7]	Lei Wang, Tantan Sun, Nana Yan, Xiaona Liu, Chao Ma, Shutao Xu, Peng Guo, Peng Tian, Zhongmin Liu. Acid Properties of SAPO-34 Molecular Sieves with Different Si Contents Templated by Various Organic Structure-Directing Agents [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 0, (): 2003046-0.
[8]	Haixia Li,Jiwei Wang,Lifang Jiao,Zhanliang Tao,Jing Liang. Spherical Nano-SnSb/C Composite as a High-Performance Anode Material for Sodium Ion Batteries [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(5): 1904017-0.
[9]	Yi Ji, Lixin Liang, Changmiao Guo, Xinhe Bao, Tatyana Polenova, Guangjin Hou. Zero-Quantum Homonuclear Recoupling Symmetry Sequences in Solid-State Fast MAS NMR Spectroscopy [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1905029-0.
[10]	Xiaolong Liu, Qiang Wang, Chao Wang, Jun Xu, Feng Deng. Hydrogen-Bond Induced Crystallization of Silicalite-1 Zeolite as Revealed by Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1905035-0.
[11]	Jing Deng,Tao Ma,Ziwei Chang,Weijing Zhao,Jun Yang. Determination of Three-Dimensional Structures of Protein Assemblies via Solid-State NMR [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1905019-0.
[12]	Yuhong Li,Xin-Ping Wu,Cong Liu,Meng Wang,Benteng Song,Guiyun Yu,Gang Yang,Wenhua Hou,Xue-Qing Gong,Luming Peng. NMR and EPR Studies of Partially Reduced TiO₂ [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1905021-0.
[13]	Chao Li, Ming Shen, Bingwen Hu. Solid-State NMR and EPR Methods for Metal Ion Battery Research [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1902019-0.
[14]	Shihan Li,Zhenchao Zhao,Shikun Li,Youdong Xing,Weiping Zhang. Aluminum Distribution and Brønsted Acidity of Al-Rich SSZ-13 Zeolite: A Combined DFT Calculation and Solid-State NMR Study [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1903021-0.
[15]	Feng Shi,Lili Hu,Jinjun Ren,Qiuhong Yang. Structural Investigation of Alkaline-Earth Phosphosilicate Glasses Containing Six-Coordinated Silicon by Solid-State NMR [J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36(4): 1902018-0.

Machine-Learning Model for Predicting the Rate Constant of ProteinLigand Dissociation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 33

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0