铀酰离子在羟基化α-石英(101)表面的吸附

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201408221

物理化学学报 >> 2014, Vol. 30 >> Issue (10): 1810-1820.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201408221

铀酰离子在羟基化α-石英(101)表面的吸附

辜家芳¹,陈文凯²

1. 福州大学至诚学院化学工程系, 福州 350002;
2. 福州大学化学系, 福州 350116

收稿日期:2014-05-13 修回日期:2014-08-21 发布日期:2014-09-30
通讯作者: 陈文凯 E-mail:qc2008@fzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（10676007）和福建省教育厅科研基金（JB14222）资助项目

Adsorption of the Uranyl Ion on the Hydroxylated α-Quartz (101) Surface

GU Jia-Fang¹, CHEN Wen-Kai²

1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Zhicheng College, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, P. R. China;
2. Department of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, P. R. China

Received:2014-05-13 Revised:2014-08-21 Published:2014-09-30
Contact: CHEN Wen-Kai E-mail:qc2008@fzu.edu.cn
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10676007) and Scientific Research Foundation of Fujian Provincial Education Department, China (JB14222).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用周期性密度泛函理论研究羟基化α-石英（101）面的铀酰离子吸附行为. 通过对铀酰离子的水合作用考虑水溶剂对结构的短程溶剂化效应，并通过类导体屏蔽模型（COSMO）考虑水溶剂对结构的远程溶剂化效应. 吸附能计算结果和电子结构数据均表明水合铀酰离子吸附构型比氢氧化铀酰吸附构型稳定，并且在液相中两种类型的稳定吸附位均为dia-O_s1O_s2位. 两种形式在电子结构上有很大的差异，主要是由于铀与表面作用后成键强弱程度不同，使5f 轨道宽化和略微红移存在差异. 在铀酰离子吸附的基础上利用卤素离子改变铀酰离子配位环境可调整体系的带隙.

关键词: α-石英(101)面, 铀酰, 密度泛函理论, 溶剂效应

Abstract:

Uranyl ion adsorption on the hydroxylated α- quartz (101) surface was investigated by firstprinciples density functional theory calculations. We explicitly considered the first hydration shell of the uranyl ion for short-range solvent effects and used the conductor-like screening model (COSMO) for longrange solvent effects. Both the adsorption energies and electronic structures of the adsorption system indicated that the bidentate hydrated uranyl species were more stable than bidentate hydroxylated species, and bidentate adsorption of the uranyl ion on the bridge site of dia-O_s1O_s2 was the most stable adsorption model in the aqueous state. The large differences in the electronic structures of the two forms were mainly because of the different degree of bonding between uranium and the surface after adsorption, which makes the 5f orbital narrow and causes a red shift. Use of halogen ions in the uranyl coordination environment can adjust the band gap of the uranyl adsorption system.

Key words: α-Quartz (101) surface, Uranyl, Density functional theory, Solvent effect

辜家芳, 陈文凯. 铀酰离子在羟基化α-石英(101)表面的吸附[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(10), 1810-1820. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201408221

GU Jia-Fang, CHEN Wen-Kai. Adsorption of the Uranyl Ion on the Hydroxylated α-Quartz (101) Surface[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 30(10), 1810-1820. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201408221

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201408221

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2014/V30/I10/1810

参考文献

(1) Sandhu, S. S.; Kohli, K. B.; Brar, A. S. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 3609. doi: 10.1021/ic00190a036
(2) Nieweg, J. A.; Lemma, K.; Trewyn, B. G.; Lin, V. S. Y.; Bakac, A. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 5641. doi: 10.1021/ic050130e
(3) Wheeler, J.; Thomas, J. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 750. (4) Krishna, V.; Kamble, V. S.; Gupta, N. M.; Selvam, P. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 15832. doi: 10.1021/jp802779e
(5) Stewart, B. D.; Mayes, M. A.; Fendorf, S. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 928. doi: 10.1021/es902194x
(6) Tang, Y.; Reeder, R. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4446. doi: 10.1021/es802369m
(7) Tang, Y.; McDonald, J.; Reeder, R. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4452. doi: 10.1021/es802370d
(8) Zhang, H. X.; Xie, Y. X.; Tao, Z. Y. Colloids. Surf. A 2005, 252, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.10.005
(9) Singer, D. M.; Maher, K.; Brown, G. E., Jr. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2009, 73, 5989. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.07.002
(10) Greathouse, J. A.; Cygan, R. T. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 3865. doi: 10.1021/es052522q
(11) Froideval, A.; Del Nero, M.; Gaillard, C.; Barillon, R.; Rossini, I.; Hazemann, J. L. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 2006, 70, 5270. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.08.027
(12) Sylwester, E. R.; Hudson, E. A.; Allen, P. G. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 2000, 64, 2431. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00376-8
(13) Lefèvre, G.; Noinville, S.; Fédoroff, M. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2006, 296, 608. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.09.016
(14) Chanda, M.; Rempel, G. L. React. Polym. 1989, 11, 71. doi: 10.1016/0923-1137(89)90084-5
(15) Comarmond, M. J.; Payne, T. E.; Harrison, J. J.; Thiruvoth, S.; Wong, H. K.; Aughterson, R. D.; Lumpkin, G. R.; Müller, K.; Foerstendorf, H. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 5536. doi: 10.1021/es201046x
(16) Drisko, G. L.; Chee Kimling, M.; Scales, N.; Ide, A.; Sizgek, E.; Caruso, R. A.; Luca, V. Langmuir 2010, 26, 17581. doi: 10.1021/la103177h
(17) Vandenborre, J.; Drot, R.; Simoni, E. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1291. doi: 10.1021/ic061783d
(18) Dossot, M.; Cremel, S.; Vandenborre, J.; Grausem, J.; Humbert, B.; Drot, R.; Simoni, E. Langmuir 2005, 22, 140. (19) Ordoñez-Regil, E.; Drot, R.; Simoni, E.; Ehrhardt, J. J. Langmuir 2002, 18, 7977. doi: 10.1021/la025674x
(20) Kremleva, A.; Krüger, S.; Rösch, N. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 2011, 75, 706. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2010.10.019
(21) Martorell, B.; Kremleva, A.; Krüger, S.; Rösch, N. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 13287. doi: 10.1021/jp101300w
(22) Kremleva, A.; Krüger, S.; Rösch, N. Langmuir 2008, 24, 9515. doi: 10.1021/la801278j
(23) Payne, T. E.; Davis, J. A.; Lumpkin, G. R.; Chisari, R.;Waite, T. D. Appl. Clay. Sci. 2004, 26, 151. doi: 10.1016/j. clay.2003.08.013
(24) Glezakou, V. A.; deJong,W. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 1257. (25) Moskaleva, L. V.; Nasluzov, V. A.; Rösch, N. Langmuir 2006, 22, 2141. doi: 10.1021/la052973o
(26) Perron, H.; Roques, J. R. m.; Domain, C.; Drot, R.; Simoni, E.; Catalette, H. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 10991. doi: 10.1021/ic801246k
(27) Perron, H.; Domain, C.; Roques, J.; Drot, R.; Simoni, E.; Catalette, H. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 6568. doi: 10.1021/ic0603914
(28) Levesque, M.; Roques, J.; Domain, C.; Perron, H.; Veilly, E.; Simoni, E.; Catalette, H. Surf. Sci. 2008, 602, 3331. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2008.09.006
(29) Greathouse, J. A.; O'Brien, R. J.; Bemis, G.; Pabalan, R. T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1646. (30) Boily, J. F.; Rosso, K. M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 7845. doi: 10.1039/c0cp01406k
(31) Bandura, A. V.; Kubicki, J. D.; Sofo, J. O. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 5756. doi: 10.1021/jp1106636
(32) Abbasi, A.; Nadimi, E.; Plänitz, P.; Radehaus, C. Surf. Sci. 2009, 603, 2502. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2009.06.004
(33) Gu, J. F.; Lu, C. H.; Chen,W. K.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, J. D. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 655. [辜家芳, 陆春海, 陈文凯,许莹, 郑金德. 物理化学学报, 2009, 25, 655.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20090419
(34) Gu, J. F.; Man, M. L.; Lu, C. H.; Chen,W. K. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 7, 1324. [辜家芳, 满梅玲, 陆春海, 陈文凯. 无机化学学报, 2012, 7, 1324.] (35) Gu, J. F.; Lu, C. H.; Chen,W. K.; Chen, Y.; Xu, K.; Huang, X.; Zheng, Y. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 792. [辜家芳, 陆春海, 陈文凯, 陈勇, 许可, 黄昕, 章永凡. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28, 792.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201201171
(36) Bargar, J. R.; Reitmeyer, R.; Lenhart, J. J.; Davis, J. A. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 2000, 64, 2737. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00398-7
(37) Delley, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 508. (38) Delley, B. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113, 7756. (39) Perdew, J. P.;Wang, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 13244. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244
(40) Perdew, J. P.;Wang, Y. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8800. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.33.8800
(41) Sauer, J. Modeling of Structure and Reactivity in Zeolites; Academic Press: London, 1992. (42) Benedek, N. A.; Snook, I. K.; Latham, K.; Yarovsky, I. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 144102. (43) Goumans, T. P. M.;Wander, A.; Brown,W. A.; Catlow, C. R. A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 2146. doi: 10.1039/b701176h
(44) Yang, J.;Wang, E. G. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 035406. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.035406
(45) Yang, J.; Meng, S.; Xu, L.;Wang, E. G. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 035413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035413
(46) Murashov, V. V.; Demchuk, E. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 10835. (47) de Leeuw, N. H.; Higgins, F. M.; Parker, S. C. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 1270. (48) Tsushima, S.; Suzuki, A. J. Mol. Struct. 1999, 487, 33. doi: 10.1016/S0166-1280(99)00137-2
(49) Spencer, S.; Gagliardi, L.; Handy, N. C.; Ioannou, A. G.; Skylaris, C. K.;Willetts, A.; Simper, A. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 1831. (50) Reich, T.; Moll, H.; Arnold, T.; Denecke, M. A.; Hennig, C.; Geipel, G.; Bernhard, G.; Nitsche, H.; Allen, P. G.; Bucher, J. J.; Edelstein, N. M.; Shuh, D. K. J. Electron. Spectrosc. 1998, 96, 237. doi: 10.1016/S0368-2048(98)00242-4
(51) Michard, P.; Guibal, E.; Vincent, T.; Le Cloirec, P. Micro. Mater. 1996, 5, 309. doi: 10.1016/0927-6513(95)00067-4

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	王鹤然, 陈凯, 伏硕, 王晧暄, 袁加轩, 胡星奕, 许文娟, 密保秀. 三种同分异构的双苯并吩噻嗪材料的合成、理论计算及光物理性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303047 - .
[3]	罗铖, 龙庆, 程蓓, 朱必成, 王临曦. Pt-C₃N₄/BiOCl S型异质结应用于光催化CO₂还原的理论计算研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(6): 2212026 - .
[4]	李若宁, 张雪, 薛娜, 李杰, 吴天昊, 徐榛, 王一帆, 李娜, 唐浩, 侯士敏, 王永锋. Ag(111)表面Ag配位结构的分等级组装[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(8): 2011060 - .
[5]	卢浩然, 魏雅清, 龙闰. 纳米孔缺陷导致单层黑磷电荷局域极大抑制非辐射电子-空穴复合的时域模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2006064 - .
[6]	杨贻顺, 周敏, 邢燕霞. 基于γ-石墨炔分子磁隧道结对称性依赖的输运性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2003004 - .
[7]	韩爱娣, 闫晓晖, 陈俊任, 程晓静, 章俊良. 分散溶剂对PEMFC催化层中超薄Nafion离聚物质子传导的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 1912052 - .
[8]	李孟婷, 郑星群, 李莉, 魏子栋. 碱性介质中氢氧化和析氢反应机理研究现状[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(9): 2007054 - .
[9]	周君慧, 敖志敏, 安太成. 基于密度泛函理论下H₂S在单原子催化剂V/Ti₂CO₂上的分解机理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2007086 - .
[10]	王云飞, 刘建华, 于美, 钟锦岩, 周琪森, 邱俊明, 张晓亮. SnO₂表面卤化提高钙钛矿太阳能电池光伏性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(3): 2006030 - .
[11]	施俊杰, 胡子琦, 杨逸豪, 步宇翔, 施祖进. 内嵌金属碳氮化物团簇富勒烯的稳定性与生成机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 1907077 - .
[12]	李诗涵,赵侦超,李世坤,邢友东,张维萍. DFT计算结合固体NMR研究富铝SSZ-13的铝分布和Brønsted酸性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(4): 1903021 - .
[13]	肖雪珠, 曹小芳, 赵东波, 荣春英, 刘述斌. 运用概念密度泛函理论和信息论方法定量描述胺类分子的分子碱度[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(11): 1906034 - .
[14]	黄智超,戴亚中,温晓杰,刘丹,林宇轩,徐珍,裴坚,吴凯. Au(111)表面Verdazyl自由基的构象转换[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1907043 - .
[15]	陈强,姜利学,李海方,陈娇娇,赵艳霞,何圣贵. 钒硼双原子阳离子活化甲烷研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1014 -1020 .

铀酰离子在羟基化α-石英(101)表面的吸附

Adsorption of the Uranyl Ion on the Hydroxylated α-Quartz (101) Surface

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0