负载型Rh基催化剂上的CO加氢制乙醇反应：载体效应

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201911053

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (10): 1911053.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201911053

负载型Rh基催化剂上的CO加氢制乙醇反应：载体效应

邵自龙¹^,², 刘晓放¹, 张书南¹^,², 王慧¹^,²^,*(), 孙予罕¹^,²^,³^,*()

¹ 中国科学院上海高等研究院，中国科学院低碳转化科学与工程重点实验室，上海 201210
² 中国科学院大学，北京 100049
³ 上海科技大学，物质科学与技术学院，上海 201210

收稿日期:2019-11-27 录用日期:2020-01-06 发布日期:2020-01-09
通讯作者: 王慧,孙予罕 E-mail:wanghh@sari.ac.cn;sunyh@sari.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21776296);国家重点研发计划(2017YFB0602203);中国科学院战略性先导科技项目(XDA21090201);中国科学院(ZDRW-ZS-2018-1-3);上海市扬帆计划(19YF1453000)

CO Hydrogenation to Ethanol over Supported Rh-Based Catalyst: Effect of the Support

Zilong Shao¹^,², Xiaofang Liu¹, Shunan Zhang¹^,², Hui Wang¹^,²^,*(), Yuhan Sun¹^,²^,³^,*()

¹ CAS Key Lab of Low-Carbon Conversion Science and Engineering, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China
² University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
³ School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China

Received:2019-11-27 Accepted:2020-01-06 Published:2020-01-09
Contact: Hui Wang,Yuhan Sun E-mail:wanghh@sari.ac.cn;sunyh@sari.ac.cn
About author:Emails: sunyh@sari.ac.cn (Y.S.); +86-21-20325009 (Y.S.)
Emails: wanghh@sari.ac.cn (H.W.). Tel.: +86-13917459728 (H.W.)
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21776296);the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFB0602203);Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA21090201);the Chinese Academy of Sciences(ZDRW-ZS-2018-1-3);Shanghai Sailing Program, China(19YF1453000)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为一种重要的基础化学品以及传统能源替代品，乙醇极具应用前景。当前乙醇的生产主要通过谷物发酵和乙烯水合法。然而效率低下的发酵过程和日益枯竭的原油资源限制了乙醇的大规模生产。因此，发展生产乙醇的可替代技术成为重要议题。由合成气(CO + H₂)出发直接制备乙醇被认为是实现煤炭、天然气和生物质等含碳资源高值化、清洁化利用的新方式。负载型Rh基催化剂作为合成气直接制乙醇最有潜力且最有效的催化体系而受到广泛研究。对于负载型Rh基催化剂来讲，合适的助剂和载体通常可以有效地提升催化剂的活性和乙醇选择性。Fe作为一种提高乙醇选择性最有效的助剂之一而被广泛地应用在Rh基催化剂的研究中。在本文中，为了探究载体的作用，我们利用初湿浸渍法制备出不同载体(CeO₂、ZrO₂和TiO₂)负载的Fe促进的Rh基催化剂用于合成气制乙醇反应中。结果表明，RhFe/TiO₂催化剂在反应条件为250 ℃，2 MPa时的CO转化率高达18.2%并且在醇分布中乙醇的选择性高达74.7%，远高于相同条件下RhFe/CeO₂和RhFe/ZrO₂催化剂的性能。表征结果表明，催化剂的比表面从小到大依次为RhFe/CeO₂ < RhFe/ZrO₂ < RhFe/TiO₂，而Rh的分散度也依次增加、粒径依次减小。这是由于较大的比表面积可能有利于Rh物种的分散，高分散的Rh物种就意味着存在更多的活性位点。H₂-程序升温还原结果表明Rh与载体、Rh与Fe之间存在相互作用，并且在实验的还原条件下TiO₂会发生部分还原，而其它的载体则不会发生还原。X射线光电子能谱分析结果表明RhFe/TiO₂催化剂具有更多的乙醇生成(Rh_x⁰-Rh_y⁺)-O-Fe^δ⁺活性位点，使得乙醇的选择性增加。CO-程序升温脱附被用来确认不同催化剂的CO吸附能力，结果表明TiO₂由于存在更多的O空穴和Ti³⁺离子从而增强了对CO的吸附，因此有利于催化剂活性的提高。

关键词: Rh基催化剂, 载体效应, 乙醇合成, 合成气转化, 铑分散度, 铁

Abstract:

Ethanol has great application prospects given it is an important essential chemical and a substitute for traditional energy sources. Currently, ethanol production is achieved through grain fermentation and petroleum-based ethylene hydration. However, the inefficient fermentation processes and increasingly depleted crude oil resources hinder the large-scale production of ethanol. Therefore, the development of alternative technologies for ethanol production has become an important issue. The direct production of ethanol from syngas (CO + H₂) is considered to be a new strategy to acquire high value-added products and achieve clean utilization of carbonaceous resources such as coal, natural gas, and biomass. Supported Rh-based catalysts have been extensively studied as the most promising and effective systems for the direct production of ethanol from syngas. The use of promoters and supports is generally effective in increasing the activity and ethanol selectivity of supported Rh-based catalysts. Fe is widely used in the research on Rh-based catalysts, as it is one of the most effective promoters for enhancing ethanol selectivity. In this work, with the aim of exploring the role of the support, we used the incipient wetness impregnation method to prepare Fe-promoted Rh-based catalysts supported by CeO₂, ZrO₂, and TiO₂ for the synthesis of ethanol from syngas. CO conversion of CO on the RhFe/TiO₂ catalyst was as high as 18.2% under the reaction conditions of 250 ℃ and 2 MPa, and the selectivity to ethanol in the alcohol distribution was 74.7%, which was much higher than that observed with RhFe/CeO₂ and RhFe/ZrO₂ under the same conditions. The characterization results showed that the specific surface of the catalyst followed the order RhFe/CeO₂ < RhFe/ZrO₂ < RhFe/TiO₂; the dispersion of Rh increased sequentially, and the particle size decreased in the same order. A larger specific surface area may favor the dispersion of the Rh species, and the highly dispersed Rh species would imply a greater number of active sites on the surface of the support. The results of H₂-temperature-programmed reduction indicated possible interactions between Rh and the support as well as between Rh and Fe, and partial reduction of TiO₂ under the experimental reduction conditions; however, the other supports did not undergo reduction. The results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicated that the RhFe/TiO₂ catalyst had the largest amount of Rh⁰ as well as Rh⁺ species. Thus, this catalyst has more (Rh_x⁰-Rh_y⁺)-O-Fe^δ+ active sites for the synthesis of ethanol, which greatly increases the ethanol selectivity. CO-temperature programmed desorption was used to confirm the CO adsorption capacity of different catalysts. The results showed that TiO₂ enhances the adsorption of CO due to the presence of more O vacancies and Ti³⁺ ions, which is beneficial to the improvement of the catalyst activity.

Key words: Rh-based catalyst, Support effect, Ethanol synthesis, Syngas conversion, Rh dispersion, Iron

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件#br#

邵自龙, 刘晓放, 张书南, 王慧, 孙予罕. 负载型Rh基催化剂上的CO加氢制乙醇反应：载体效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10), 1911053. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201911053

Zilong Shao, Xiaofang Liu, Shunan Zhang, Hui Wang, Yuhan Sun. CO Hydrogenation to Ethanol over Supported Rh-Based Catalyst: Effect of the Support[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(10), 1911053. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201911053

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201911053

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I10/1911053

图/表 6

Fig 1

Fig 2

Table 1

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

参考文献 36

1	Surisetty V. R. ; Dalai A. K. ; Kozinski J. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2011, 404, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.07.021
2	Luk H. T. ; Mondelli C. ; Ferré D. C. ; Stewart J. A. ; Pérez-Ramírez J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 1358. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00324a
3	Gao J. ; Mo X. H. ; Goodwin J. C., Jr. J. Catal. 2009, 268, 142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2009.09.012
4	Yang N. ; Medford A. J. ; Liu X. Y. ; Studt F. ; Bligaard T. ; Bent S. T. ; Nørskov J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3705. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b12087
5	Yang N. ; Yoo J. S. ; Schumann J. ; Bothra P. ; Singh J. A. ; Valle E. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Nørskov J. K. ; Bent S. T. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 5746. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b01851
6	Bhasin M. M. ; Bartley W. J. ; Ellgen P. C. ; Wilson T. P. J. Catal. 1978, 54, 120. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(78)90035-0
7	Liao P. Y. ; Zhang C. ; Zhang L. J. ; Yang Y. Z. ; Zhong L. S. ; Guo X. Y. ; Wang H. ; Sun Y. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 1672.
	廖珮懿; 张辰; 张丽君; 杨彦章; 钟良枢; 郭晓亚; 王慧; 孙予罕. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 1672. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704143
8	Li J. L. ; Hu R. J. ; Qu H. ; Su Y. ; Wang N. ; Su H. Q. ; Gu X. J. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 249, 63. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.02.060
9	Gao J. ; Mo X. H. ; Chien A. C. Y. ; Torres W. ; Goodwin J. G., Jr. J. Catal. 2009, 262, 119. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.12.006
10	Xu D. D. ; Zhang H.T. ; Ma H. F. ; Qian W. X. ; Ying W. Y. Catal. Commun. 2017, 98, 90. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2017.03.019
11	Liu W. G. ; Wang S. ; Sun T. J. ; Wang S. D. Catal. Lett. 2015, 145, 1741. doi: 10.1007/s10562-015-1577-5
12	Han L. P. ; Mao D. S. ; Yu J. ; Guo Q. S. ; Lu G. Z. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2013, 454, 81. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.01.008
13	Egbebi A. ; Schwartz V. ; Overbury S. H. ; Spivey J. J. Catal. Today 2010, 149, 91. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.07.104
14	Wang Y. ; Luo H. Y. ; Liang D. B. ; Bao X. H. J. Catal. 2000, 196, 46. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2000.3026
15	Chen W. M. ; Ding Y. J. ; Xue F. ; Song X. G. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2015, 31, 1.
	陈维苗; 丁云杰; 薛飞; 宋宪根. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31, 1. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201411054
16	Li F. ; Ma H. F. ; Zhang H. T. ; Ying W. Y. ; Fang D. Y. C. R. Chim. 2014, 17, 1109. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2014.01.015
17	Carrillo P. ; Shi R. ; Teeluck K. ; Senanayake S. D. ; White M. G. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 7279. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02235
18	State R. ; Scurtu M. ; Miyazaki A. ; Papa F. ; Atkinson F. ; Munteanu C. ; Balint I. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 975. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.009
19	Abdel-Mageed A. M. ; Widmann D. ; Olesen S. E. ; Chorkendorff I. ; Biskupek J. ; Behm R. J. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 6753. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01520
20	Jacobs G. ; Das T. K. ; Zhang Y. Q. ; Li J. L. ; Racoillet G. ; Davis B. H. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2002, 233, 263. doi: 10.1016/s0926-860x(02)00195-3
21	Matsubu J. C. ; Zhang S. ; DeRita L. ; Marinkovic N. S. ; Chen J. G. ; Graham G. W. ; Pan X. ; Christopher P. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 120. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2607
22	Chen Y. ; Zhang H. T. ; Ma H. F. ; Qian W. X. ; Jin F. Y. ; Ying W. Y. Catal. Lett. 2018, 148, 691. doi: 10.1007/s10562-017-2202-6
23	Kim M. J. ; Kim H. J. ; Lee S. J. ; Ryu I. S. ; Yoon H. C. ; Lee K. B. ; Jeon S. G. Catal. Commun. 2019, 130, 105764. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2019.105764
24	Mao W. ; Su J. J. ; Zhang Z. P. ; Xu X. C. ; Dai W. W. ; Fu D. L. ; Xu J. ; Zhou X. G. ; Han Y. F. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 135, 312. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.02.035
25	Yin H. M. ; Ding Y. J. ; Luo H. Y. ; Zhu H. J. ; He D. P. ; Xiong J. M. ; Lin L. W. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2003, 243, 155. doi: 10.1016/s0926-860x(02)00560-4
26	Han L. P. ; Mao D. S. ; Yu J. ; Guo Q. S. ; Lu G. Z. Catal. Commun. 2012, 23, 20. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2012.02.032
27	Chen G. C. ; Guo C. Y. ; Zhang X. H. ; Huang Z. J. ; Yuan G. Q. Fuel Process. Technol. 2011, 92, 456. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.10.012
28	Chen W. M. ; Ding Y. J. ; Song X. G. ; Wang T. ; Luo H. Y. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2011, 407, 231. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.044
29	Wang J. J. ; Zhang Q. H. ; Wang Y. Catal. Today 2011, 171, 257. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.023
30	Chuang S. S. C. ; Pien S. I. J. Catal. 1992, 135, 618. doi: 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90058-p
31	Ichikawa M. ; Fukushima T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1985, 6, 321. doi: 10.1039/c39850000321
32	Qin S. D. ; Zhang C. H. ; Xu J. ; Yang Y. ; Xiang H. W. ; Li Y. W. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2011, 392, 118. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.10.032
33	Schunemann V. ; Trevino H. ; Lei G. D. ; Tomczak D. C. ; Sachtler W. M. H. ; Fogash K. ; Dumesic J. A. J. Catal. 1995, 153, 144. doi: 10.1006/jcat.1995.1116
34	Wang W. W. ; Qu Z. P. ; Song L. X. ; Fu Q. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 40, 22. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.03.001
35	Zhang X. C. ; Hu W. Y. ; Zhang K. F. ; Wang J. N. ; Sun B. J. ; Li H. Z. ; Qiao P. Z. ; Wang L. ; Zhou W. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6894. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01114
36	Vannice M. A. ; Sudhakar C. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 2429. doi: 10.1021/j150656a002

Catalyst	Surface area/(m²·g^-1)	Pore volume /(cm³·g^-1)	Pore size/nm	Support crystallite size/nm	Rh dispersion ^c/%	Rh particlesize ^d/nm
RhFe/CeO₂	10.8	0.03	9.5	90.9 ^a	19.6	4.7
RhFe/ZrO₂	13.1	0.05	13.6	35.9 ^a	24.5	3.7
RhFe/TiO₂	41.5	0.18	15.9	24.4 ^b	48.8	1.9

[1]	刘振中, 万思文, 吴阳, 王波延, 季宏亮. CoFe₂O₄/CuO活化过氧乙酸高效降解磺胺甲恶唑[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211019 -0 .
[2]	殷宇豪, 沈阳, 王虎, 陈肖, 邵林, 华文宇, 王娟, 崔义. TiN/Hf_xZr_1-xO₂/TiN铁电电容器的原位生长与表征[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(5): 2006016 - .
[3]	李艳, 胡星盛, 黄静伟, 王磊, 佘厚德, 王其召. 铁基多相助催化剂光电化学水氧化研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009022 - .
[4]	张婷,李翠翠,王伟,郭兆琦,庞爱民,马海霞. 三维氧化铁/石墨烯的构建及其对CL-20的热分解性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905048 - .
[5]	王庆兵,郭政伟,陈弓,何刚. 1, 1'-双(二苯基膦基)二茂铁介导的芳烃碳氢键芳基化反应制备联芳基骨架[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 1021 -1026 .
[6]	王露, 孙威, 刘超. 同核铁系双金属络合物及其在均相催化体系中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 697 -708 .
[7]	胡江涛, 郑家新, 潘锋. 锂电池磷酸铁锂正极材料的结构与性能相关性的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 361 -370 .
[8]	张春梅,聂亦涵,杜爱军. 二维铁电材料ABP₂X₆内在极高的负泊松比[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(10): 1128 -1133 .
[9]	曹梦雄,王兴宇,马亚茹,马春林,周卫平,王晓雄,王海欧,谭伟石. 点缺陷引起中子辐照MgO(110)单晶的铁磁性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(4): 437 -444 .
[10]	宁红岩,杨其磊,杨晓,李鹰霞,宋兆钰,鲁逸人,张立红,刘源. 碳纤维负载Rh-Mn紧密接触的催化剂及其合成气制乙醇催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1865 -1874 .
[11]	廖珮懿,张辰,张丽君,杨彦章,钟良枢,郭晓亚,王慧,孙予罕. Cu含量对以水滑石为前驱体的Cu/Co/Mn/Al催化剂高级醇合成性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1672 -1680 .
[12]	何磊.,徐俊敏.,王永建.,张昌锦.. LiFePO₄包覆的Li_1.2Mn_0.54Ni_0.13Co_0.13O₂锂离子电池正极材料:增强的库伦效率和循环性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1605 -1613 .
[13]	占林军,孙晓燕,周瑛,朱秋莲,陈银飞,卢晗锋. 铈基复合氧化物催化剂在SiO₂表面的失活机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1474 -1482 .
[14]	刘金,麦江泉,李诗,任召辉,李铭,武梦娇,吴勇军,路新慧,李翔,田鹤,王宗荣,韩高荣. 钙钛矿铁电纳米片诱导的P (VDF-TrFE)取向生长[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1261 -1266 .
[15]	连超,张垲,王远. 氧化铁负载铂纳米簇催化卤代硝基苯本体氢化性质研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(5): 984 -992 .

负载型Rh基催化剂上的CO加氢制乙醇反应：载体效应

CO Hydrogenation to Ethanol over Supported Rh-Based Catalyst: Effect of the Support

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0