含氮金属有机框架衍生的铜基催化剂电催化还原二氧化碳

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006017

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (11): 2006017.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006017

所属专题：能源与材料化学

含氮金属有机框架衍生的铜基催化剂电催化还原二氧化碳

金惠东¹^,², 熊力堃¹^,², 张想¹^,², 连跃彬¹^,², 陈思¹^,², 陆永涛¹^,²^,*(), 邓昭¹^,², 彭扬¹^,²^,*()

¹ 苏州大学能源学院，能源与材料创新研究院，江苏苏州 215006
² 江苏省先进碳材料与可穿戴能源技术省重点实验室，江苏苏州 215006

收稿日期:2020-06-09 录用日期:2020-07-04 发布日期:2020-07-13
通讯作者: 陆永涛,彭扬 E-mail:sudalyt@suda.edu;ypeng@suda.edu.cn
作者简介:第一联系人：
^† These authors contributed equally.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21701118);江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(18KJA480004);江苏省六大人才高峰计划(XCL-057);江苏省六大人才高峰计划(XCL-062);江苏省六大人才高峰计划(TD-XCL-006)

Cu-Based Catalyst Derived from Nitrogen-Containing Metal Organic Frameworks for Electroreduction of CO₂

Huidong Jin¹^,², Likun Xiong¹^,², Xiang Zhang¹^,², Yuebin Lian¹^,², Si Chen¹^,², Yongtao Lu¹^,²^,*(), Zhao Deng¹^,², Yang Peng¹^,²^,*()

¹ Soochow Institute of Energy and Material Innovations, College of Energy, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China
² Provincial Key Laboratory for Advanced Carbon Materials and Wearable Energy Technologies, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China

Received:2020-06-09 Accepted:2020-07-04 Published:2020-07-13
Contact: Yongtao Lu,Yang Peng E-mail:sudalyt@suda.edu;ypeng@suda.edu.cn
About author:Email: ypeng@suda.edu.cn (Y. P.)
Email: sudalyt@suda.edu, cn (Y. L.)
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21701118);Major Project of Natural Science Research in Universities of Jiangsu Province, China(18KJA480004);Six Talent Peak Programs in Jiangsu Province, China(XCL-057);Six Talent Peak Programs in Jiangsu Province, China(XCL-062);Six Talent Peak Programs in Jiangsu Province, China(TD-XCL-006)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

将二氧化碳转化为高附加值的燃料和化学品是缓解当前能源和环境危机的有效策略之一。众所周知，铜基纳米材料是电还原二氧化碳的良好催化剂，但仍存在选择性低和耐久性差等缺点。本文中，我们以Cu-NBDC MOF为前驱体，通过退火得到了一种锚定在氮掺杂多孔碳上的Cu₂O/Cu催化剂(Cu₂O/Cu@NC)。XPS结果显示，Cu₂O/Cu@NC中的Cu-N含量随着退火温度升高而降低。通过电还原二氧化碳测试结果分析，我们发现与不含氮的Cu₂O/Cu@C相比，Cu₂O/Cu@NC有效抑制了副反应HER，提高了电还原二氧化碳反应的整体催化活性，而且随着Cu-N含量的增加，Cu₂O/Cu@NC对乙烯和甲烷的选择性得到显著提高。在400 ℃退火处理下，Cu₂O/Cu@NC的CO₂催化效率高于86% (−1.4 – −1.6 V vs. RHE)，其中包括20.4%的C₂H₄ (−1.4 V vs. RHE)和23.9%的CH₄ (−1.6 V vs. RHE)。相比之下，Cu₂O/Cu@C的二氧化碳还原效率最高不足50%，且无明显乙烯和甲烷生成。我们认为这些显著的催化性能差异主要归因于Cu-N有利于稳定二氧化碳还原反应中*CH₂中间体的吸附，抑制*H生成氢气。这些结果表明，通过调控氮的掺杂可以有效改变铜基MOF衍生的催化剂的二氧化碳还原路径并提高其催化性能。

关键词: 铜基MOFs材料, 氮掺杂, Cu₂O/Cu, 二氧化碳还原

Abstract:

With the development of human society and economy, the demand for energy resources has also increased rapidly. However, the use of traditional fossil energy leads to high amounts of carbon dioxide emissions, causing severe greenhouse effects. This, in turn, triggers a series of environmental problems. Harnessing renewable energy such as solar energy, wind energy, and hydropower to replace the traditional energy sources is very urgent. Conversion CO₂ into value-added fuels and chemicals could be a useful strategy to mitigate the current energy and environmental crisis. It is well known that Cu-based materials are good electrocatalysts for the electrochemical reduction of CO₂ (ECR-CO₂). However, they suffer from some disadvantages such as high overpotential and poor selectivity and durability. Therefore, the development of copper based electrocatalysts with high activity and selectivity is essential.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) materials that have the advantages of large specific surface area, tunable pore size and porosity, and highly dispersed unsaturated metal centers can be used as electrocatalysts for CO₂ reduction or as precursors for further preparation of catalysts with excellent performance. Through thermal decomposition in an inert atmosphere, metal ions in MOF can be transformed into metal clusters, metal oxides, or even metal mono-atoms. Meanwhile, organic ligands are carbonized into porous carbon materials. The addition of some heteroatoms such as B, N, P, and S to carbon materials has also been shown to be effective in changing the electron state and coordination structure of the catalysts. These heteroatoms combine with carbon atoms to form a new active site, denoted as M-X-C (M is the central metal ion and X is the mixed heteroatom) to enhance the catalytic activity of the ECR-CO₂.

Herein, pre-synthesized Cu-NBDC MOF (a Cu-based MOF synthesized by using 2-aminoterephthalic acid (NBDC) as ligand) is used as a precursor to anchor Cu₂O/Cu on nitrogen doped porous carbon (Cu₂O/Cu@NC) by annealing at different temperatures. XPS analysis shows that the Cu-N content in Cu₂O/Cu@NC decreases with increasing annealing temperature. Investigation of the ECR-CO₂ reveals that Cu₂O/Cu@NC can inhibit the HER more effectively compared to Cu₂O/Cu@C, thereby improving the overall catalytic activity and multi-electron product selectivity of the ECR-CO₂. While the Faradic efficiency of formate (FE_formate) increases with increasing temperature, those of ethylene and methane (FE_C₂H₄ and FE_CH₄, respectively) decreases with increasing temperature. Specifically, upon annealing at 400 ℃, the CO₂ Faradic efficiency of Cu₂O/Cu@NC-400 is higher than 86% (−1.4 to −1.6 V vs. RHE), including 20.4% of FE_C₂H₄ (−1.4 V vs. RHE) and 23.9% of FE_CH₄ (−1.6 V vs. RHE). By contrast, FE_CH₄ (−1.6 V vs. RHE) in the presence of Cu₂O/Cu@C-400 without nitrogen doping is only 2.33%, and no C₂H₄ is detected. These significant differences in the catalytic behavior can be attributed to the fact that Cu-N is conducive for the stable adsorption of the *CH₂ intermediate during the ECR-CO₂, thus inhibiting the evolution of H₂. These results indicate that the pathway of the ECR-CO₂ and its performance can be effectivel regulated by complexing nitrogen with Cu motifs.

Key words: Copper-based MOFs material, Nitrogen doping, Cu₂O/Cu, CO₂ reduction

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

金惠东, 熊力堃, 张想, 连跃彬, 陈思, 陆永涛, 邓昭, 彭扬. 含氮金属有机框架衍生的铜基催化剂电催化还原二氧化碳[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(11), 2006017. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006017

Huidong Jin, Likun Xiong, Xiang Zhang, Yuebin Lian, Si Chen, Yongtao Lu, Zhao Deng, Yang Peng. Cu-Based Catalyst Derived from Nitrogen-Containing Metal Organic Frameworks for Electroreduction of CO₂[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(11), 2006017. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006017

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006017

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I11/2006017

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

参考文献 53

1	Bai X. F. ; Chen W. ; Wang B. Y. ; Feng G. H. ; Wei W. ; Jiao Z. ; Sun Y. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 2388.
	白晓芳; 陈为; 冯光辉; 魏伟; 焦正; 孙予罕. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 2388. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201706131
2	Costentin C. ; Robert M. ; Saveant J. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2423. doi: 10.1039/TF9050100085
3	Hori Y. ; Murata A. ; Takahashi R. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday. Trans. 1 1989, 85, 2309. doi: 10.1039/F19898502309
4	Hori Y. ; Kikuchi K. ; Murata A. ; Suzuki S. Chem. Lett. 1986, 15, 897. doi: 10.1246/cl.1986.897
5	Hori Y. ; Takahashi R. ; Yoshinami Y. ; Murata A. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7075. doi: 10.1021/jp970284i
6	Bagger A. ; Ju W. ; Varela A. S. ; Strasser P. ; Rossmeisl J. ChemPhysShem 2017, 18, 3266. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201700736
7	Peterson A. A. ; Nørskov J. K. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 251. doi: 10.1021/jz201461p
8	Hansen H. A. ; Varley J. B. ; Peterson A. A. ; Norskov J. K. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 388. doi: 10.1021/jz3021155
9	Zhu Q. G. ; Sun X. F. ; Kang X. C. ; Ma J. ; Qian Q. L. ; Han B. X. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32, 261.
	朱庆宫; 孙晓甫; 康欣晨; 马珺; 钱庆利; 韩布兴. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32, 261. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201512101
10	Kuhl K. P. ; Cave E. R. ; Abram D. N. ; Jaramillo T. F. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 doi: 10.1039/C2EE21234J
11	Kim D. ; Kley C. S. ; Li Y. ; Yang P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114, 10560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711493114
12	Meng Y. C. ; Kuang S. Y. ; Liu H. ; Fan Q. ; Ma X. B. ; Zhang S. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2006034.
	孟怡辰; 况思宇; 刘海; 范群; 马新宾; 张生. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2006034. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202006034
13	Gattrell M. ; Gupta N. ; Co A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2006, 594, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2006.05.013
14	Peterson A. A. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Studt F. ; Rossmeisl J. ; Norskov J. K. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 1311. doi: 10.1039/C0EE00071J
15	Baturina O. A. ; Lu Q. ; Padilla M. A. ; Xin L. ; Li W. ; Serov A. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3682. doi: 10.1021/cs500537y
16	Li Y. ; Cui F. ; Ross M. B. ; Kim D. ; Sun Y. ; Yang P. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 1312. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05287
17	Li Q. ; Zhu W. ; Fu J. ; Zhang H. ; Wu G. ; Sun S. Nano Energy 2016, 24, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.024
18	Ning H. ; Wang W. ; Mao Q. ; Zheng S. ; Yang Z. ; Zhao Q. ; Wu M. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 938.
	宁汇; 王文行; 毛勤虎; 郑诗瑞; 杨中学; 赵青山; 吴明铂. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34, 938. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801263
19	Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Dong, C.; Feng, Y.; Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Du, X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 2763. doi: 1021/acsami.8b20545
20	Ting L. R. L. ; Piqué O. ; Lim S. Y. ; Tanhaei M. ; Calle-Vallejo F. ; Yeo B. S. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 4059. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b05319
21	Li Y. C. ; Wang Z. ; Yuan T. ; Nam D. H. ; Luo M. ; Wicks J. ; Chen B. ; Li J. ; Li F. W. ; de Arguer F. P. G. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 8584. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b02945
22	Kottakkat T. ; Klingan K. ; Jiang S. ; Jovanov Z. P. ; Davies V. H. ; El-Nagar G. A. M. ; Dau H. ; Roth C. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 14734. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b22071
23	Zhang C. ; Chen Z. ; Lian Y. ; Chen Y. ; Li Q. ; Gu Y. ; Lu Y. ; Deng Z. ; Peng Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 1404.
	张楚风; 陈哲伟; 连跃斌; 陈宇杰; 李沁; 顾银冬; 陆永涛; 邓昭; 彭扬. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35, 1404. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905030
24	Machan C. W. ; Chabolla S. A. ; Yin J. ; Gilson M. K. ; Tezcan F. A. ; Kubiak C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14598. doi: 10.1021/ja5085282
25	Hinogami R. ; Yotsuhashi S. ; Deguchi M. ; Zenitani Y. ; Hashiba H. ; Yamada Y. ECS Electrochem. Lett. 2012, 1, H17. doi: 10.1149/2.001204eel
26	Kumar R. S. ; Kumar S. S. ; Kulandainathan M. A. Electrochem. Commun. 2012, 25, 70. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.09.018
27	Albo J. ; Vallejo D. ; Beobide G. ; Castillo O. ; Castano P. ; Irabien A. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1100. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600693
28	Kang X. ; Zhu Q. ; Sun X. ; Hu J. ; Zhang J. ; Liu Z. ; Han B. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 266. doi: 10.1039/c5sc03291a
29	Liu Z. M. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 1307.
	刘志敏. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35, 1307. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201908014
30	Hod I. ; Sampson M. D. ; Deria P. ; Kubiak C. P. ; Farha O. K. ; Hupp J. T. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 6302. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01767
31	Kornienko N. ; Zhao Y. ; Kley C. S. ; Zhu C. ; Kim D. ; Lin S. ; Chang C. J. ; Yaghi O. M. ; Yang P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14129. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08212
32	Chen L. ; Li Y. ; Xu N. ; Zhang G. Carbon 2018, 132, 172. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.051
33	Ye J. ; Johnson J. K. Catal. Sci. Tech. 2016, 6, 8392. doi: 10.1039/c6cy01245k
34	Rungtaweevoranit B. ; Baek J. ; Araujo J. R. ; Archanjo B. S. ; Choi K. M. ; Yaghi O. M. ; Somorjai G. A. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 7645. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03637
35	Diercks C. S. ; Liu Y. ; Cordova K. E. ; Yaghi O. M. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 301. doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0033-5
36	Nam D. H. ; Bushuyev O. S. ; Li J. ; De Luna P. ; Seifitokaldani A. ; Dinh C. T. ; de Arquer F. P. G. ; Wang Y. ; Liang Z. ; Proppe A. H. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11378. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b06407
37	Qiu Y. L. ; Zhong H. X. ; Zhang T. T. ; Xu W. B. ; Su P. P. ; Li X. F. ; Zhang H. M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2480. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15255
38	Wang R. M. ; Sun X. H. ; Ould-Chikh S. ; Osadchii D. ; Bai F. ; Kapteijn F. ; Gascon J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 14751. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b02226
39	Zhou W. ; Jia J. ; Lu J. ; Yang L. ; Hou D. ; Li G. ; Chen S. Nano Energy 2016, 28, 29. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.027
40	Huan T. N. ; Ranjbar N. ; Rousse G. ; Sougrati M. ; Zitolo A. ; Mougel V. ; Jaouen F. ; Fontecave M. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1520. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b03353
41	Ju W. ; Bagger A. ; Hao G. P. ; Varela A. S. ; Sinev I. ; Bon V. ; Roldan Cuenya B. ; Kaskel S. ; Rossmeisl J. ; Strasser P. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 944. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01035-z
42	Cheng Y. S. ; Chu X. P. ; Ling M. ; Li N. ; Wu K. L. ; Wu F. H. ; Li H. ; Yuan G. ; Wei X. W. Catal. Sci. Tech. 2019, 9, 5668. doi: 10.1039/C9CY01131E
43	Rostamnia S. ; Alamgholiloo H. ; Liu X. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 469, 310. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.021
44	Wang R. ; Wang K. ; Wang Z. ; Song H. ; Wang H. ; Ji S. J. Power Sources 2015, 297, 295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.107
45	Zhao K. ; Liu Y. ; Quan X. ; Chen S. ; Yu H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 5302. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b15402
46	Han X. ; He X. ; Sun L. ; Han X. ; Zhan W. ; Xu J. ; Wang X. ; Chen J. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b04219
47	Han X. ; He X. ; Wang F. ; Chen J. ; Xu J. ; Wang X. ; Han X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 10220. doi: 10.1039/c7ta01909b
48	Ishizuka S. ; Kato S. ; Maruyama T. ; Akimoto K. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 40, 2765. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.40.2765
49	Zheng Y. ; Cheng P. ; Xu J. ; Han J. ; Wang D. ; Hao C. ; Alanagh H. R. ; Long C. ; Shi X. ; Tang Z. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 4911. doi: 10.1039/c8nr10236h
50	Zhang L. S. ; Liang X. Q. ; Song W. G. ; Wu Z. Y. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 12055. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00789g
51	Zhong H. X. ; Wang J. ; Zhang Y. W. ; Xu W. L. ; Xing W. ; Xu D. ; Zhang Y. F. ; Zhang X. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 14235. doi: 10.1002/anie.201408990
52	Nie X. ; Luo W. ; Janik M. J. ; Asthagiri A. J. Catal. 2014, 312, 108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.01.013
53	Sharma P. P. ; Wu J. ; Yadav R. M. ; Liu M. ; Wright C. J. ; Tiwary C. S. ; Yakobson B. I. ; Lou J. ; Ajayan P. M. ; Zhou X. D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13701. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506062

Sample	Max FE_product (%)
Sample	C₂H₄ (−1.4 V vs. RHE)	CH₄ (−1.6 V vs. RHE)	Formate (−1.2 V vs. RHE)
Cu₂O/Cu@NC-400	20.4%	23.9%	40.1%
Cu₂O/Cu@NC-600	16.3%	17.4%	57.4%
Cu₂O/Cu@NC-800	4.4%	3.8%	67.9%
Cu₂O/Cu@C-400	0%	2.3%	25.0%
Cu₂O/Cu@C-600	0%	0.8%	30.0%
Cu₂O/Cu@C-800	0%	0%	30.8%

[1]	曹玥晗, 郭瑞, 马敏智, 黄泽皑, 周莹. 活性位点电子密度变化对光催化CO₂活化和选择转化的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303029 - .
[2]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[3]	陈瑶, 陈存, 曹雪松, 王震宇, 张楠, 刘天西. CO₂和N₂电还原中缺陷及界面工程的最新进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2212053 -0 .
[4]	李景学, 于跃, 徐斯然, 闫文付, 木士春, 张佳楠. 电子自旋效应在电催化剂中的作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2302049 - .
[5]	彭芦苇, 张杨, 何瑞楠, 徐能能, 乔锦丽. 电催化二氧化碳还原催化剂、电解液、反应器和隔膜研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2302037 - .
[6]	董金涛, 季赛楠, 张屹, 季梦夏, 王彬, 李英杰, 陈志刚, 夏杰祥, 李华明. 构筑Z型MnO₂/BiOBr异质结用于光催化环丙沙星去除和CO₂还原[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(11): 2212011 - .
[7]	朱弼辰, 洪小洋, 唐丽永, 刘芹芹, 唐华. 二维/一维BiOBr_0.5Cl_0.5/WO₃ S型异质结助力光催化CO₂还原[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(7): 2111008 - .
[8]	宋雨珂, 谢文富, 邵明飞. 一体化电极电催化二氧化碳还原研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2101028 - .
[9]	杨越, 朱加伟, 王鹏彦, 刘海咪, 曾炜豪, 陈磊, 陈志祥, 木士春. 镶嵌于NH₂-MIL-125 (Ti)衍生氮掺多孔碳中的花状超细纳米TiO₂作为高活性和稳定性的锂离子电池负极材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(6): 2106002 - .
[10]	杜亚东, 孟祥桐, 汪珍, 赵鑫, 邱介山. 石墨烯基二氧化碳电化学还原催化剂的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2101009 - .
[11]	黄小雄, 马英杰, 智林杰. 超薄氮掺杂碳纳米片负载单原子镍用于高效电催化还原二氧化碳[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(2): 2011050 - .
[12]	陈宇新, 王丽君, 姚志波, 郝磊端, 谭心怡, Masa Justus, Robertson Alex W., 孙振宇. 单原子配位结构及与载体相互作用的调控用于二氧化碳电催化还原[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(11): 2207024 -0 .
[13]	滕嘉楠, 许光月, 傅尧. CoMn@NC催化5-羟甲基糠醛常压氧化为2, 5-呋喃二甲酸二甲酯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(10): 2204031 - .
[14]	高增强, 王聪勇, 李俊俊, 朱亚廷, 张志成, 胡文平. 导电金属有机框架材料在电催化中的成就，挑战和机遇[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7): 2010025 - .
[15]	王则鉴, 洪佳佳, Ng Sue-Faye, 刘雯, 黄俊杰, 陈鹏飞, Ong Wee-Jun. 氧化物钙钛矿的光催化研究进展：CO₂还原、水裂解、固氮[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2011033 - .

含氮金属有机框架衍生的铜基催化剂电催化还原二氧化碳

Cu-Based Catalyst Derived from Nitrogen-Containing Metal Organic Frameworks for Electroreduction of CO₂

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 53

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

含氮金属有机框架衍生的铜基催化剂电催化还原二氧化碳

Cu-Based Catalyst Derived from Nitrogen-Containing Metal Organic Frameworks for Electroreduction of CO2

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 53

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0

Cu-Based Catalyst Derived from Nitrogen-Containing Metal Organic Frameworks for Electroreduction of CO₂