生物质转化中C―O/C―C键的活化断裂

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202203016

物理化学学报 >> 2022, Vol. 38 >> Issue (10): 2203016.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202203016

所属专题：生物质催化转化

生物质转化中C―O/C―C键的活化断裂

周浩, 景亚轩(), 王艳芹()

华东理工大学化学与分子工程学院工业催化研究所, 上海 200237

收稿日期:2022-03-10 录用日期:2022-04-11 发布日期:2022-04-13
通讯作者: 景亚轩,王艳芹 E-mail:jingyaxuan@mail.ecust.edu.cn;wangyanqin@ecust.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21832002);国家自然科学基金(21808063);国家自然科学基金(21808043);国家自然科学基金(21872050);国家自然科学基金(22003016);国家自然科学基金(92145302);国家自然科学基金(22102056);中国博士后科学基金(2021M691011);中国博士后科学基金(2021TQ0106);上海超级博士后和上海市科学技术委员会(10dz2220500)

Activation/Cleavage of C―O/C―C Bonds during Biomass Conversion

Hao Zhou, Yaxuan Jing(), Yanqin Wang()

Research Institute of Industrial Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Received:2022-03-10 Accepted:2022-04-11 Published:2022-04-13
Contact: Yaxuan Jing,Yanqin Wang E-mail:jingyaxuan@mail.ecust.edu.cn;wangyanqin@ecust.edu.cn
About author:Yanqin Wang, Email: wangyanqin@ecust.edu.cn (Y.W.)
Yaxuan Jing, Email: jingyaxuan@mail.ecust.edu.cn (Y.J.)
Supported by:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21832002);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21808063);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21808043);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21872050);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22003016);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(92145302);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22102056);the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2021M691011);the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2021TQ0106);Shanghai Super Postdoctoral Fellow, and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(10dz2220500)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生物质作为自然界中唯一可持续的有机碳来源，在解决环境和能源问题、创建一个碳中和的社会方面展现出巨大的潜力。木质生物质是由具有C―O/C―C键的基本结构单元构成的高分子化合物，活化、断裂这些C―O/C―C键是生物质高值化利用的关键，因此在过去十年中受到了广泛的关注。本文首先简要综述了生物质转化中C―O/C―C键催化断裂的现状，主要关注C―O/C―C键断裂的关键挑战和现有策略。我们的目标不是全面概述C―O/C―C键活化断裂的现况，而是提出与C―O/C―C键断裂相关的核心问题并且对未来的研究作出展望。我们选择了碳水化合物和木质素中几种具有代表性的C―O/C―C键来讨论它们在不同情况下协同催化断裂的机理，然后对未来的研究提出自己的见解。

关键词: 生物质, 催化转化, C―O键, C―C键, 活化断裂机理

Abstract:

Sustainable fuels and chemicals are receiving unprecedented attention worldwide in the context of achieving global carbon neutrality. Biomass, as the only natural and sustainable carbon-based source, shows great potential in addressing our current environmental/energy problems and in creating a carbon-neutral society. Lignocellulosic biomass is made up of basic structural units containing C―O/C―C bonds, and the catalytic cleavage of these C―O/C―C bonds is the key for biomass valorization; thus, garnering considerable attention in the past decade. This viewpoint begins with a brief report on the current status of catalytic activation/cleavage of C―O/C―C bonds during biomass conversion, and then goes on to discuss the key challenges experienced and possible strategies that can be implemented using cooperative catalysis. Our goal is not to provide a comprehensive overview of the activation/cleavage of the C―O/C―C bonds in biomass, but rather to highlight the core questions and challenges related to this process and the requirements for future investigations. We selected several representative C―O/C―C bonds in carbohydrates and lignin to discuss their catalytic mechanism in terms of total/selective bond cleavage, and then present our own insights for future studies. Therefore, this article mainly discusses the following two aspects: (1) The activation and cleavage of C―O bonds, which includes total and selective C―O bond cleavage in furan-based fuel precursors and lignin. When aiming to produce liquid fuels, including alkanes and arenes from biomass, the total cleavage of C―O bonds is essential. During the hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of furan-based fuel precursors, various C―O bonds need to be cleaved, especially the C―O bond of each tetrahydrofuran ring, which has the highest bond energy. When compared with the total HDO of fuel precursors, the removal of the phenolic hydroxyl groups in lignin to produce arenes is more challenging because of the competition between the over-hydrogenation of the benzene rings and the cleavage of phenolic C―O bonds. The selective or partial cleavage of C―O/C―C bonds to form highly functionalized chemicals has recently attracted great interest and is believed to be a dynamic future research avenue. For example, the production of phenol from lignin or lignin-model compounds, through the selective removal of methoxy groups and para-side-chain groups, while preserving the phenolic hydroxyl groups, has been extensively explored in the past few years. (2) The other important aspect of this article is the cleavage of the C―C bonds in carbohydrates and lignin. The cleavage of carbohydrate C―C bonds occurs via retro-aldol condensation, which produces propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, ethanol, and lactic acid. The cleavage of C―C bonds in lignin is challenging because the bond energy of the C―C bonds is generally higher than that of the C―O bonds in lignin. Therefore, in this section, we discuss the cleavage of the strongest 5―5' bond in lignin. Finally, some subjective perspectives and future directions are provided, also highlighting several major challenges in this field.

Key words: Biomass, Catalytic conversion, C―O bond, C―C bond, Cleavage mechanism

周浩, 景亚轩, 王艳芹. 生物质转化中C―O/C―C键的活化断裂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(10), 2203016. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202203016

Hao Zhou, Yaxuan Jing, Yanqin Wang. Activation/Cleavage of C―O/C―C Bonds during Biomass Conversion[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38(10), 2203016. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202203016

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202203016

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V38/I10/2203016

图/表 4

参考文献 50

1	Sudarsanam, P.; Peeters, E.; Makshina, E. V.; Parvulescu, V. I.; Sels, B. F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (8),2366. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00452H
2	Zhang, Z.; Song, J.; Han, B. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (10),6834. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00457
3	Lin, Z.; Chen, R.; Qu, Z.; Chen, J. G. Green Chem. 2018, 20 (12),2679. doi: 10.1039/C8GC00239H
4	Robinson, A. M.; Hensley, J. E.; Medlin, J. W. ACS Catal. 2016, 6 (8),5026. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00923
5	Li, H.; Riisager, A.; Saravanamurugan, S.; Pandey, A.; Sangwan, R. S.; Yang, S.; Luque, R. ACS Catal. 2018, 8 (1),148. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02577
6	Nakagawa, Y.; Liu, S.; Tamura, M.; Tomishige, K. ChemSusChem 2015, 8 (7),1114. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201403330
7	Schutyser, W.; Renders, T.; Van den Bosch, S.; Koelewijn, S.-F.; Beckham, G.; Sels, B. F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (3),852. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00566K
8	Jing, Y.; Guo, Y.; Xia, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y. Chem 2019, 5 (10),2520. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.022
9	Liu, S.; Dutta, S.; Zheng, W.; Gould, N. S.; Cheng, Z.; Xu, B.; Saha, B.; Vlachos, D. G. ChemSusChem 2017, 10 (16),3225. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201700863
10	Yang, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Pan, X.; Li, N.; Wang, A.; Cong, Y.; Wang, X. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 201, 266. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.045
11	Wang, A.; Li, J.; Zhang, T. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2 (6),65. doi: 10.1038/s41570-018-0010-1
12	Wang, S.; Zhang, K.; Li, H.; Xiao, L. P.; Song, G. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1),416. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20684-1
13	Li, S.; Dong, M.; Yang, J.; Cheng, X.; Shen, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z. Q.; Gong, X. Q.; Liu, H.; Han, B. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1),584. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20878-7
14	Ding, S.; Hülsey, M. J.; Pérez-Ramírez, J.; Yan, N. Joule 2019, 3 (12),2897. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.015
15	Kim, S.; Kwon, E. E.; Kim, Y. T.; Jung, S.; Kim, H. J.; Huber, G. W.; Lee, J. Green Chem. 2019, 21 (14),3715. doi: 10.1039/C9GC01210A
16	Liu, S.; Josephson, T. R.; Athaley, A.; Chen, Q. P.; Norton, A.; Ierapetritou, M.; Siepmann, J. I.; Saha, B.; Vlachos, D. G. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5 (2),eaav5487. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aav5487
17	Xia, Q. N.; Cuan, Q.; Liu, X. H.; Gong, X. Q.; Lu, G. Z.; Wang, Y. Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (37),9755. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403440
18	Jing, Y.; Xin, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40 (8),1168. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63371-1
19	Xue, F.; Ma, D.; Tong, T.; Liu, X.; Hu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6 (10),13107. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02648
20	Jin, W.; Pastor-Pérez, L.; Shen, D.; Sepúlveda-Escribano, A.; Gu, S.; Ramirez Reina, T. ChemCatChem 2019, 11 (3),924. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201801722
21	Gazi, S. Appl. Catal. B 2019, 257, 117936. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117936
22	Shao, Y.; Xia, Q.; Dong, L.; Liu, X.; Han, X.; Parker, S. F.; Cheng, Y.; Daemen, L. L.; Ramirez-Cuesta, A. J.; Yang, S.; et al.. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 16104. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16104
23	Dong, L.; Yin, L.-L.; Xia, Q.; Liu, X.; Gong, X.-Q.; Wang, Y. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8 (3),735. doi: 10.1039/c7cy02014g
24	Sun, Z.; Fridrich, B.; De Santi, A.; Elangovan, S.; Barta, K. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (2),614. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00588
25	Mao, J.; Zhou, J.; Xia, Z.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Xu, W.; Yan, P.; Liu, K.; Guo, X.; Zhang, Z. C. ACS Catal. 2017, 7 (1),695. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02368
26	Ishida, T.; Murayama, T.; Taketoshi, A.; Haruta, M. Chem. Rev. 2019, 120 (2),464. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00551
27	Dong, L.; Xin, Y.; Liu, X.; Guo, Y.; Pao, C.-W.; Chen, J.-L.; Wang, Y. Green Chem. 2019, 21 (11),3081. doi: 10.1039/c9gc00327d
28	Song, S.; Zhang, J.; Yan, N. Fuel Process. Technol. 2020, 199, 106224. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106224
29	Huang, X.; Ludenhoff, J. M.; Dirks, M.; Ouyang, X.; Boot, M. D.; Hensen, E. J. ACS Catal. 2018, 8 (12),11184. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03430
30	Mei, Q.; Liu, H.; Shen, X.; Meng, Q.; Liu, H.; Xiang, J.; Han, B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (47),14868. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706846
31	Li, L.; Dong, L.; Li, D.; Guo, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y. ACS Catal. 2020, 10 (24),15197. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c03170
32	Colmenares, J. C.; Varma, R. S.; Nair, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (22),6675. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00257B
33	Cai, Z.; Long, J.; Li, Y.; Ye, L.; Yin, B.; France, L. J.; Dong, J.; Zheng, L.; He, H.; Liu, S. Chem 2019, 5 (9),2365. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.05.021
34	Li, L.; Dong, L.; Liu, X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 260, 118143. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118143
35	Xin, Y.; Jing, Y.; Dong, L.; Liu, X.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Y. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55 (63),9391. doi: 10.1039/c9cc04101j
36	Chen, S.; Wojcieszak, R.; Dumeignil, F.; Marceau, E.; Royer, S. B. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (22),11023. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00134
37	Nakagawa, Y.; Tamura, M.; Tomishige, K. ACS Catal. 2013, 3 (12),2655. doi: 10.1021/cs400616p
38	Ji, N.; Zhang, T.; Zheng, M.; Wang, A.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, J. G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 120 (44),8638. doi: 10.1002/ange.200803233
39	Liu, C.; Zhang, C.; Hao, S.; Sun, S.; Liu, K.; Xu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y. Catal. Today 2016, 261, 116. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.06.030
40	Wattanapaphawong, P.; Reubroycharoen, P.; Yamaguchi, A. RSC Adv. 2017, 7 (30),18561. doi: 10.1039/c6ra28568f
41	Zhu, J.; Wang, J.; Dong, G. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11 (1),45. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0157-x
42	Dong, L.; Lin, L.; Han, X.; Si, X.; Liu, X.; Guo, Y.; Lu, F.; Rudić, S.; Parker, S. F.; Yang, S.; et al.. Chem 2019, 5 (6),1521. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.007
43	Shuai, L.; Sitison, J.; Sadula, S.; Ding, J.; Thies, M. C.; Saha, B. ACS Catal. 2018, 8 (7),6507. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b00200
44	Wang, M.; Wang, F. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31 (50),1901866. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901866
45	Rinaldi, R.; Jastrzebski, R.; Clough, M. T.; Ralph, J.; Kennema, M.; Bruijnincx, P. C.; Weckhuysen, B. M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (29),8164. doi: 10.1002/anie.201510351
46	Giummarella, N.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A. J.; Lawoko, M. Green Chem. 2019, 21 (7),1573. doi: 10.1039/C8GC03606C
47	Yan, J.; Meng, Q.; Shen, X.; Chen, B.; Sun, Y.; Xiang, J.; Liu, H.; Han, B. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6 (45),eabd1951. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1951
48	Meng, Q.; Yan, J.; Wu, R.; Liu, H.; Sun, Y.; Wu, N.; Xiang, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, J.; Han, B. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1),4534. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24780-8
49	Ragauskas, A. J.; Beckham, G. T.; Biddy, M. J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M. F.; Davison, B. H.; Dixon, R. A.; Gilna, P.; Keller, M. Science 2014, 344 (6185),1246843. doi: 10.1126/science.1246843
50	Wu, X.; Fan, X.; Xie, S.; Lin, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1 (10),772. doi: 10.1038/s41929-018-0148-8

[1]	侯玉翠, 何卓森, 任树行, 吴卫泽. 均相催化剂催化氧气氧化生物质制备甲酸[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212065 -0 .
[2]	韩慧贤, 陈澜, 赵建成, 于海涛, 汪洋, 闫何恋, 王英雄, 薛智敏, 牟天成. 生物质基酸性低共熔溶剂用于高效溶解木质素及溶解机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212043 -0 .
[3]	于艳科, 耿梦荞, 魏德胜, 何炽. 钾对CuSO₄/TiO₂脱硝催化剂的失活效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2206034 -0 .
[4]	李少鹏, 杜靖, 张彬, 刘艳贞, 梅清清, 孟庆磊, 董明华, 杜鹃, 赵志娟, 郑黎荣, 韩布兴, 赵美廷, 刘会贞. 利用空间位阻和氢溢流协同作用促进5-羟甲基糠醛选择性加氢制备5-甲基糠醛[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(10): 2206019 - .
[5]	郎雪玲, 雷淑桃, 李愽龙, 李晓红, 马冰, 赵晨. 高熔点蜡合成技术的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(10): 2204045 - .
[6]	王伟, 王瑶, 占自祥, 谭天, 邓卫平, 张庆红, 王野. 纤维素及其衍生物催化脱氧转化制化学品[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(10): 2205032 - .
[7]	谭天,杨佳慧,朱春华,王官武,陈家富,苏吉虎. 利用原位变温EPR研究富勒烯双体笼间的弱C―C键[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(8): 1929 -1932 .
[8]	万昭敏,魏星,彭伟,尹征磊,肖丽,庄林. Pb²⁺促进乙醇氧化C―C键断裂的在线电化学透射红外光谱研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(6): 1467 -1472 .
[9]	朱善辉,王建国,樊卫斌. 甘油催化氢解制备精细化学品的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(1): 85 -97 .
[10]	张畅, 秦玉才, 高雄厚, 张海涛, 莫周胜, 初春雨, 张晓彤, 宋丽娟. Ce改性对Y型分子筛酸性及其催化转化性能的调变机制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(2): 344 -352 .
[11]	黄雯, 赵进, 康琪, 徐凯臣, 于镇, 王建, 马延文, 黄维. 三维碳微米管/碳纳米管复合结构的制备及在超级电容器中的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(10): 2269 -2275 .
[12]	徐勇, 颜世志, 叶同奇, 张钊, 李全新. 生物质炭和富二氧化碳合成气制取二甲醚[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(08): 1926 -1932 .
[13]	叶同奇, 张朝霞, 徐勇, 颜世志, 朱九方, 刘勇, 李全新. Na促进的CuCoMn催化剂催化生物质合成气合成高醇[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(06): 1493 -1500 .
[14]	王华瑜, 张长斌, 贺泓, 王莲. 磁性碳基磺酸化固体酸催化剂的制备及其催化水解纤维素[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(07): 1873 -1878 .
[15]	陈海翔;刘乃安;范维澄. 基于差示扫描量热技术的生物质热解两步连续反应模型研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2006, 22(07): 786 -790 .

生物质转化中C―O/C―C键的活化断裂

Activation/Cleavage of C―O/C―C Bonds during Biomass Conversion

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 50

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0