基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212057

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

共价有机框架(COFs)在电催化析氧反应(OER)中的应用得到了广泛的关注。然而，大多数无金属共价有机框架(COFs)的导电性较差，不利于OER反应。四硫富瓦烯(TTF)是一种良好的电子供体，具有快速的电子转移能力，将TTF整合到共价有机框架骨架中将有助于电子的转移。在此，我们报道了一种基于四硫富瓦烯的二维无金属共价有机框架材料，JUC-630。与不含四硫富瓦烯的同类材料(Etta-Td COF)相比，JUC-630具有较低的过电位(400 mV)和塔菲尔斜率(104 mV∙dec⁻¹)。本研究提出了合理设计功能基元的策略，这有助于大大提高COF材料的OER催化活性。

关键词: 共价有机框架, 析氧反应, 电催化, 无金属催化剂

Abstract:

Increasing global energy consumption and the depletion of traditional energy sources pose severe challenges to environmental protection and energy supply security. Electrochemical decomposition of water is a green and promising technology and is also a key technology for efficient and sustainable energy production and storage by fuel cells and metal-air batteries. The electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER), as the anode reaction for the electrolysis of water, requires large amounts of energy owing to multielectron participation, and to the breaking of O―H bonds and formation of O―O bonds. Many precious metal catalysts are expensive, and these are responsible for secondary environmental pollution, which is detrimental for the large-scale application of the OER. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a stable, clean, and efficient electrocatalyst to improve the efficiency of the OER. The application of covalent organic frameworks (COFs) to the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has received widespread attention. However, most metal-free covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have unsuitably poor conductivity for the OER. Herein, we report a 2D metal-free tetrathiafulvalene (TTF)-based COF, termed JUC-630. To improve the conductivity of COFs, we introduced TTF, which is a good electron donor, into the COF material. At the same time, compared with its analogue without TTF (Etta-Td COF), we found that JUC-630 has a large surface area, better crystallinity, and higher stability. Furthermore, we tested their OER performance in a 1 mol∙L⁻¹ KOH solution, and the results show that JUC-630 has a higher current density than Etta-Td COF and TTF at the same potential. For example, at a current density of 10 mA∙cm⁻², the overpotential of JUC-630 was 400 mV, which was significantly lower than that of Etta-Td COF (450 mV). This overpotential is comparable to or even better than those of the widely discussed carbon and graphene materials. The lower overpotential, Tafel slope values, and smaller electrochemical impedance illustrate that the introduction of TTF monomers into the COF material results in a significantly improved OER performance for JUC-630. This study proposes a strategy for the rational design of functional motifs that can greatly improve the OER catalytic activity of COF materials. Thus, the results should help to suggest new efficient approaches for the preparation of catalysts for energy conversion from water resources.

Key words: Covalent organic frameworks, Oxygen evolution reaction, Electrocatalysis, Metal-free catalyst

夏伟锋, 季成宇, 王锐, 裘式纶, 方千荣. 基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9), 2212057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212057

Weifeng Xia, Chengyu Ji, Rui Wang, Shilun Qiu, Qianrong Fang. Metal-Free Tetrathiafulvalene Based Covalent Organic Framework for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39(9), 2212057. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212057

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202212057

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V39/I9/2212057

图/表 4

参考文献 42

1	You H. ; Yang S. ; Ding B. ; Yang H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2880. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35319A
2	Walter M. G. ; Warren E. L. ; McKone J. R. ; Boettcher S. W. ; Mi Q. ; Santori E. A. ; Lewis N. S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6446. doi: 10.1021/cr1002326
3	Liu X. ; Dai L. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16064. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.64
4	Kamila S. ; Mohanty B. ; Samantara A. K. ; Guha P. ; Ghosh A. ; Jena B. ; Satyam P. V. ; Mishra B. K. ; Jena B. K. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08677-5
5	Teng H. ; Wang W. ; Han X. ; Hao X. ; Yang R. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39 (1), 2107017.
	滕浩天; 王文涛; 韩晓峰; 郝翔; 杨瑞枝; 田景华. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39 (1), 2107017. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202107017
6	Yu Y. ; Feng Y. ; Guan B. ; Lou W. ; Paik U. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9 (4), 1246. doi: 10.1039/C6EE00100A
7	Reier T. ; Oezaslan M. ; Strasser P. ACS Catal. 2012, 2 (8), 1765. doi: 10.1021/cs3003098
8	Sardar K. ; Petrucco E. ; Hiley C. I. ; Sharman J. D. B. ; Wells P. P. ; Russell A. E. ; Kashtiban R. J. ; Sloan J. ; Walton R. I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (41), 10960. doi: 10.1021/cr1002326
9	Bergmann A. ; Martinez-Moreno E. ; Teschner D. ; Chernev P. ; Gliech M. ; de Araujo J. F. ; Reier T. ; Dan H. ; Strasser P. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8625. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9625
10	Tran Ngoc H. ; Rousse G. ; Zanna S. ; Lucas I. T. ; Xu X. ; Menguy N. ; Mougel V. ; Fontecave M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56 (17), 4792. doi: 10.1002/anie.201700388
11	Liu X. ; Wang L. ; Yu C. ; Tian C. ; Sun F. ; Ma J. ; Li L. ; Fu H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16166. doi: 10.1002/anie.201809009
12	Bhanja P. ; Mohanty B. ; Patra A. K. ; Ghosh S. ; Jena B. K. ; Bhaumik A. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 583. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201801312
13	Siracusano S. ; Van Dijk N. ; Payne-Johnson E. ; Baglio V. ; Aricò A. S. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 164, 488. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.005
14	Li Y. ; Li M. ; Jiang L. Q. ; Lin L. ; Cui L. ; He Q. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16 (42), 23196. doi: 10.1039/C4CP02528H
15	Wang Q. ; Lee S. ; Zhu Q. ; Liu J. ; Wang Y. ; Dai S. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22 (7), 2178. doi: 10.1021/cm100139d
16	Sidik R. A. ; Anderson A. B. ; Subramanian N. P. ; Kumaraguru S. P. ; Popov B. N. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110 (4), 1787. doi: 10.1021/jp055150g
17	Liu W. ; Peng F. ; Wang J. ; Yu H. ; Zheng X. ; Yang A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50 (14), 3257. doi: 10.1002/ange.201006768
18	Gong P. ; Du F. ; Xia H. ; Durstock M. ; Dai M. Science 2009, 323 (5915), 760. doi: 10.1126/science.1168049
19	Yang J. ; Jiang J. ; Zhao Y. ; Zhu L. ; Chen S. ; Wang X. Z. ; Wu Q. ; Ma J. ; Ma Y. W. ; Hu Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50 (31), 7270. doi: 10.1002/ange.201101287
20	Wu K. ; Zhang Y. ; Yong Z. ; Li Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38 (9), 2106034.
	吴昆杰; 张永毅; 勇振中; 李清文. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38 (9), 2106034. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202106034
21	Zhu Y.-N. ; Cao C.-Y. ; Jiang W.-J. ; Yang S.-L. ; Hu J.-S. ; Song W.-G. ; Wan L.-J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 18470. doi: 10.1039/C6TA08335H
22	Kone I. ; Xie A. ; Tang Y. ; Chen Y. ; Liu J. ; Chen Y. ; Sun Y. ; Yang X. ; Wan P. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 20963. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b02306
23	Côté A. P. ; Benin A. I. ; Ockwig N. W. ; O'Keeffe M. ; Matzger A. J. ; Yaghi O. M. Science 2005, 310, 1166. doi: 10.1126/science.1120411
24	Song Y. ; Sun Q. ; Aguila B. ; Ma S. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1801410. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801410
25	Li Z. ; Li H. ; Guan X. ; Tang J. ; Yusran Y. ; Li Z. ; Xue M. ; Fang Q. ; Yan Y. ; Valtchev V. ; Qiu S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (49), 17741. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11283
26	Li H. ; Chang J. ; Li S. ; Guan X. ; Li D. ; Li C. ; Tang L. ; Xue M. ; Yan Y. ; Valtchev V. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (34), 13324. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06908
27	Liu X. ; Guan X. ; Fang Q. ; Jin Y. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2019, 40 (7), 1341.
	刘小舟; 管新宇; 方千荣; 金永日. 高等学校化学学报, 2019, 40 (7), 1341. doi: 10.7503/cjcu20190086
28	Yan Y. ; Guan X. ; Li H. ; Fang Q. ; Qiu S. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 170. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz122
29	Rodríguez-San-Miguel D. ; Zamora F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4375. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00258H
30	Liang Y. ; Feng L. ; Liu X. ; Zhao Y. ; Chen Q. ; Sui Z. ; Wang N. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 127095. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127095
31	Shan Z. ; Wu M. ; Du Y. ; Xu B. ; He B. ; Wu X. ; Zhang G. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 5058. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00978
32	Lu Y. ; Liang Y. ; Zhao Y. ; Xia M. ; Liu X. ; Shen T. ; Feng L. ; Yuan N. ; Chen Q. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 1644. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c20203
33	Li S. ; Li L. ; Li Y. ; Dai L. ; Liu C. ; Liu Y. ; Li J. ; Lv J. ; Li P. ; Wang B. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 8717. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01242
34	Wang X. ; Maeda K. ; Thomas A. ; Takanabe K. ; Xin G. ; Carlsson J. M. ; Domen K. ; Antonietti M. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76. doi: 10.1038/nmat2317
35	Wu Q. ; Xie R. ; Mao M. ; Chai G. ; Yi J. ; Zhao S. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 1005. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02756
36	Ding H. ; Li Y. ; Hu H. ; Sun Y. ; Wang J. ; Wang C. ; Wang C. ; Zhang G. ; Wang B. ; Xu W. ; et al Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 14614. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405330
37	Kitamura T. ; Nakaso S. ; Mizoshita N. ; Tochigi Y. ; Shimomura T. ; Mor-iyama M. ; Ito K. ; Kato T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14769. doi: 10.1021/ja053496z
38	Tao S. ; Jiang D. CCS Chem. 2020, 2, 2003. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.020.202000491
39	Liu Y. ; Ren J. ; Wang Y. ; Zhu X. ; Guan X. ; Wang Z. ; Zhou Y. ; Zhu L. ; Qiu S. ; Xiao S. ; et al CCS Chem. 2022, doi: 10.31635/ccschem.022.202202352
40	Li M. ; Liu J. ; Li Y. ; Xing G. ; Yu X. ; Peng C. ; Chen L. CCS Chem. 2020, 2, 696. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.020.202000257
41	Song J. ; Wang Z. ; Liu Y. ; Tuo C. ; Wang Y. ; Fang Q. ; Qiu S. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2022, 38, 834. doi: 10.1007/s40242-022-2060-7
42	He C. ; Wu Q. ; Mao M. ; Zou Y. ; Liu B. ; Huang Y. ; Cao R. CCS Chem. 2020, 2, 2368. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.020.202000460

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	段欣漩, Sendeku Marshet Getaye, 张道明, 周道金, 徐立军, 高学庆, 陈爱兵, 邝允, 孙晓明. 钨掺杂镍铁水滑石高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303055 - .
[3]	王宁, 李一, 崔乾, 孙晓玥, 胡悦, 罗运军, 杜然. 金属气凝胶：可控制备与应用展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212014 -0 .
[4]	胡荣, 韦丽云, 鲜靖林, 房光钰, 吴植傲, 樊淼, 郭家越, 李青翔, 刘凯思, 姜会钰, 徐卫林, 万骏, 姚永刚. 微波热冲快速制备二维多孔La_0.2Sr_0.8CoO₃钙钛矿用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212025 -0 .
[5]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[6]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[7]	杨帅, 徐瑜歆, 郝子坤, 秦胜建, 张润鹏, 韩钰, 杜利伟, 朱紫洢, 杜安宁, 陈欣, 吴昊, 乔冰冰, 李坚, 王艺, 孙昺晨, 闫融融, 赵晋津. 高效医学传感钙钛矿材料研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211025 -0 .
[8]	荣佑文, 桑佳琪, 车丽, 高敦峰, 汪国雄. 二氧化碳电催化还原中的电解质效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212027 -0 .
[9]	许义飞, 杨瀚文, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 电催化动力学简介[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2210025 -0 .
[10]	王奥琦, 陈军, 张鹏飞, 唐珊, 冯兆池, 姚婷婷, 李灿. NiMo(O)物相结构与电解水析氢反应活性的关联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2301023 -0 .
[11]	胡洋, 刘斌, 徐路遥, 董自强, 仵亚婷, 刘杰, 钟澄, 胡文彬. 基于微流控技术平台的Pt基三元电催化剂高通量合成和筛选[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209004 -0 .
[12]	徐斯然, 吴奇, 卢帮安, 唐堂, 张佳楠, 胡劲松. “绿氢”工业化碱性催化剂研究现状及未来展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2209001 -0 .
[13]	尉瑞芳, 李东峰, 尹恒, 王秀丽, 李灿. 微秒时间分辨的工况电化学紫外可见吸收光谱测量系统[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207035 -0 .
[14]	韦天然, 张书胜, 刘倩, 邱园, 罗俊, 刘熙俊. 富氧空位的非晶氧化铜高选择性电催化还原CO₂制乙烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207026 -0 .
[15]	刘真, 孟祥福, 古万苗, 查珺, 闫楠, 尤青, 夏楠, 王辉, 伍志鲲. 组合掺杂引入新型、多种镉配位方式增强金纳米团簇的电催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2212064 - .