苯乙烯在Ag(111)和Ag(110)表面环氧化反应结构敏感性的理论研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302043

物理化学学报 >> 2013, Vol. 29 >> Issue (04): 723-730.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302043

苯乙烯在Ag(111)和Ag(110)表面环氧化反应结构敏感性的理论研究

王晨¹, 魏子章², 吕永康¹, 邢斌³, 王贵昌³

1 太原理工大学教育部和山西省共建煤科学与技术重点实验室, 太原 030024;
2 天津环境工程评估中心, 天津 300191;
3 南开大学化学学院和天津市分子--金属基重点实验室, 天津 300071

收稿日期:2012-11-07 修回日期:2013-01-30 发布日期:2013-03-25
通讯作者: 吕永康, 王贵昌 E-mail:wangguichang@nankai.edu.cn; lykang@tyut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(21078252)资助项目

Theoretical Investigation of Structure-Sensitivity of Styrene Epoxidation on Ag(111) and Ag(110) Surfaces

WANG Chen¹, WEI Zi-Zhang², LÜ Yong-Kang¹, XING Bin³, WANG Gui-Chang³

1 Key Laboratory of Coal Science and Technology, Ministry of Education and Shanxi Province, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, P. R. China;
2 Tianjin Enviromental Engineering Assessment Center, Tianjin 300191, P. R. China;
3 Department of Chemistry and the Tianjin Key Laboratory of Metal and Molecule-based Material Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, P. R. China

Received:2012-11-07 Revised:2013-01-30 Published:2013-03-25
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21078252).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用密度泛函理论(DFT)对苯乙烯在Ag(110)表面和Ag(111)表面的环氧化反应进行了计算研究. 经计算, 在Ag(110)表面预吸附氧原子更易吸附在3 重穴位(3h), 吸附能为-3.59 eV; 在Ag(111)表面预吸附氧原子的最稳定吸附位是fcc 位, 吸附能为-3.69 eV. 苯乙烯的环氧化反应过程首先经过一个金属中间体, 然后再进一步反应变为产物, 其中经过直链中间体较支链中间体更加有利. Ag(110)面的反应活化能一般大于Ag(111)面的, 并且微观动力学模拟结果表明, Ag(111)表面生成环氧苯乙烷的选择性要明显高于Ag(110)表面(0.38 与 0.003), 原因是Ag(111)面环氧化反应活化能小于苯乙醛及燃烧中间体的活化能, 而在Ag(110)上正相反.

关键词: 苯乙烯, 选择性氧化, 结构敏感, 银催化剂, 密度泛函理论计算

Abstract:

The selective oxidation of styrene on oxygen-covered Ag(110) and Ag(111) surfaces is studied by density functional theory (DFT) calculations with the periodic slab model. On the Ag(110) surface, a pre-adsorbed oxygen atom prefers the 3-fold hollow site (3h) with an adsorption energy of -3.59 eV. On the Ag(111) surface, the most stable adsorption site for a pre-adsorbed oxygen atom is the fcc site, and the adsorption energy is -3.69 eV. The reaction process of the selective oxidation of styrene includes two steps: the formation of surface intermediates (branched oxametallacycle and linear oxametallacycle) and the subsequent formation of different products. The calculated results show that the formation of styrene oxide via the linear oxametallacycle (i.e., the pre-adsorbed atomic oxygen bound to the methylene group in styrene) is the favorable reaction mechanism on both Ag(110) and Ag(111) surfaces. The reaction barriers for the different reaction steps of styrene epoxidation on the Ag(110) surface are generally higher than those on the Ag(111) surface. Moreover, the micro-kinetic simulation results indicate that the relative selectivity towards the formation of styrene oxide on the Ag(111) surface is much higher than that on the Ag(110) surface (0.38 vs 0.003) because the energy barrier for the styrene epoxidation is smaller than that for the formation of phenyl acetaldehyde and its combustion intermediate on Ag(111) surface. The reverse trends occurred on the Ag(110) surface.

Key words: Styrene, Selective oxidation, Structure sensitivity, Ag catalyst, Density functional theory calculation

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

王晨, 魏子章, 吕永康, 邢斌, 王贵昌. 苯乙烯在Ag(111)和Ag(110)表面环氧化反应结构敏感性的理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(04): 723-730.

WANG Chen, WEI Zi-Zhang, LÜ Yong-Kang, XING Bin, WANG Gui-Chang. Theoretical Investigation of Structure-Sensitivity of Styrene Epoxidation on Ag(111) and Ag(110) Surfaces[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2013, 29(04): 723-730.

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302043

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2013/V29/I04/723

参考文献

(1) Barteau, M. A. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 5021. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.09.024
(2) Klust, A.; Madix, R. J. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 5025. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2006.08.049
(3) Serafin, J. G.; Liu, A. C.; Seyedmonir, S. R. J. Mol. Catal. A:Chem. 1998, 131, 157. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1169(97)00263-X
(4) Bocquet, M. L.; Sautet, P.; Cerda, J.; Carlisle, C. I.;Webb, M. J.;King, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3119. doi: 10.1021/ja027634l
(5) Linic, S.; Barteau, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 310. doi: 10.1021/ja0118136
(6) Linic, S.; Barteau, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4034.doi: 10.1021/ja029076g
(7) Park, D. M.; Ghazali, S.; Gau, G. Appl. Catal. 1983, 6 (2), 175.doi: 10.1016/0166-9834(83)80263-2
(8) Zhou, L.; Madix, R. J. Surf. Sci. 2009, 603, 1751. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2008.08.032
(9) Bocquet, M. L.; Loffreda, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,17207. doi: 10.1021/ja051397f
(10) Linic, S.; Piao, H.; Adib, K.; Barteau, M. A. Angew. Chem. Int.Edit. 2004, 43, 2918.
(11) Christopher, P.; Linic, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11264.doi: 10.1021/ja803818k
(12) Chen, H. T.; Chang, J. G.; Ju, S. P.; Chen, H. L. J. Phys. Chem.Lett. 2010, 1, 739. doi: 10.1021/jz900469f
(13) Barteau, M. A.; Madix, R. J. Surf. Sci. 1981, 103 (2-3), L171.
(14) Roberts, J. T.; Madix, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8540.doi: 10.1021/ja00233a038
(15) Lambert, R. M.;Williams, F. J.; Cropley, R. L.; Palermo, A.J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 228 (1-2), 27. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2004.09.077
(16) Hawker, S.; Mukoid, C.; Badyal, J. P. S.; Lambert, R. M. Surf.Sci. Lett. 1989, 219 (3), L615.
(17) Williams, F. J.; Bird, D. P. C.; Palermo, A.; Santra, A. K.;Lambert, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8509. doi: 10.1021/ja039378y
(18) Klust, A.; Madix, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1034. doi: 10.1021/ja054845s
(19) Liu, X. Y.; Klust, A.; Madix, R. J.; Friend, C. M. J. Phys. Chem.C 2007, 111, 3675. doi: 10.1021/jp066560n
(20) Zhou, L.; Madix, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 4725. doi: 10.1021/jp7119558
(21) Mukoid, C.; Hawker, S.; Badyal, J. P. S.; Lambert, R. M. Catal.Lett. 1990, 4 (1), 57. doi: 10.1007/BF00764871
(22) Deng, X. Y.; Friend, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17178.doi: 10.1021/ja0557031
(23) Quiller, R. G.; Liu, X. Y.; Friend, C. M. Chemistry-An AsianJournal 2010, 5 (1), 78. doi: 10.1002/asia.v5:1
(24) Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Comp. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15. doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
(25) Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 14251. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251
(26) Perdew, J. P.; Chevary, J. A.; Vosko, S. H.; Jackson, K. A.;Pederson, M. R.; Singh, D. J.; Fiolhais, C. Phys. Rev. B 1992,46, 6671. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671
(27) Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
(28) Blouml, P. E. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
(29) Henkelman, G.; Uberuaga, B. P.; Jónsson, H. J. Chem. Phys.2000, 113, 9901. doi: 10.1063/1.1329672
(30) Monkhorst, H. J.; Pack, J. D. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
(31) Li,W. X.; Stampfl, C.; Scheffler, M. Phys. Rev. B 2002, 65,075407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.075407
(32) Shi, H. Q.; Stampfl, C. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 76, 075327. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.075327
(33) Bocquet, M. L.; Michaelides, A.; Loffreda, D.; Sautet, P.; Alavi,A.; King, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5620. doi: 10.1021/ja0297741
(34) Pang, X. Y.; Xing, B.; Xue, L. Q.;Wang, G. C. J. Comput.Chem. 2010, 31, 1618.
(35) Xue, L. Q.; Pang, X. Y.;Wang, G. C. J. Comput. Chem. 2009,30, 438. doi: 10.1002/jcc.v30:3
(36) Torres, D.; Lopez, N.; Illas, F.; Lambert, R. M. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 2005, 127, 10774. doi: 10.1021/ja043227t
(37) Torres, D.; Lopez, N.; Illas, F. J. Catal. 2006, 243 (2), 404. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2006.08.011
(38) Lukaski, A. C.; Enever, M. C. N.; Barteau, M. A. Surf. Sci.2007, 601, 3372. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.06.015
(39) Tonigold, K.; Gross, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 224701. doi: 10.1063/1.3439691
(40) Grimme, S. J. Comput. Chem. 2006, 27, 1787.
(41) Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. J. Chem. Phys.2010, 132, 154104. doi: 10.1063/1.3382344
(42) Benco, L.; Bucko, T.; Hafner, J. J. Catal. 2011, 277, 104.
(43) Torres, D.; Lopez, N.; Illas, F.; Lambert, R. M. Angew. Chem.Int. Edit. 2007, 46, 2055.
(44) Wang, H. F.; Liu, Z. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10996.

[1]	程晓蒙,焦东霞,梁志豪,魏金金,李宏平,杨俊佼. 聚苯乙烯-聚4-乙烯基吡啶两亲嵌段共聚物在CO₂膨胀液体中的组装行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 945 -951 .
[2]	王心怡,谢磊,丁元琪,姚心仪,张弛,孔惠慧,王利坤,许维. 超高真空条件下碱基与金属在Au(111)表面的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(12): 1321 -1333 .
[3]	刘玉玉,李杰伟,薄一凡,杨磊,张效霏,解令海,仪明东,黄维. 芴基张力半导体结构和光电性质的理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1803 -1810 .
[4]	韩磊,彭丽,蔡凌云,郑旭明,张富山. 液态聚乙二醇CH₂剪切振动和扭转振动——拉曼光谱和密度泛函理论计算[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(5): 1043 -1050 .
[5]	代卫国,何丹农. 手性布洛芬对映体的选择性光电化学氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(5): 960 -967 .
[6]	朱倩,曹朝暾,曹晨忠. 间位基团激发态取代基常数的扩展及应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(4): 729 -735 .
[7]	高义粉,庄桂林,柏家奇,钟兴,王建国. 新型Zn²⁺基金属有机框架结构的温度依赖的导电、发光性能及理论计算[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(1): 242 -248 .
[8]	李奎,赵耀林,邓佳,贺朝会,丁书江,石伟群. 放射性碘分子在Cu₂O表面的吸附:第一性原理密度泛函研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(9): 2264 -2270 .
[9]	王娟,李世坤,赵侦超,周丹红,陆安慧,张维萍. 胺基功能化的炭材料上二氧化碳吸附的密度泛函理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(7): 1666 -1673 .
[10]	刘建红,吕存琴,晋春,王贵昌. 碱性介质中CO对甲醇在PtAu(111)和Pt(111)表面氧化生成甲酸的影响的第一性原理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(4): 950 -960 .
[11]	赵宗彦,田凡. CdS/FeP复合光催化材料界面结构与性质的理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(10): 2511 -2517 .
[12]	曹潇潇, 苏艳, 赵纪军, 刘昌岭, 周潘旺. 烷烃客体分子(C_nH_m, n≤6, m≤14)在5¹²6²和5¹²6⁴水笼中的稳定性与拉曼光谱的密度泛函理论计算[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(8): 1437 -1446 .
[13]	张海新, 陈树伟, 崔杏雨, 潘大海, 秦张峰, 王建国. Ce助剂对V/SiO₂催化CO₂氧化乙苯脱氢性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(2): 351 -358 .
[14]	王沾祺, 周志明, 张锐, 李莉, 程振民. Pd-Cu/γ-Al₂O₃催化苯乙炔选择性加氢反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(12): 2315 -2322 .
[15]	黄贤丹, 李莉, 魏秋颖, 张文治, 路露. 三维有序大孔复合材料Bi₂O₃/TiO₂制备与多模式下光催化降解结晶紫[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(12): 2615 -2623 .

苯乙烯在Ag(111)和Ag(110)表面环氧化反应结构敏感性的理论研究

Theoretical Investigation of Structure-Sensitivity of Styrene Epoxidation on Ag(111) and Ag(110) Surfaces

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0