燃料电池复合石墨双极板基材的研究进展：材料、结构与性能

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009095

Abstract

Abstract:

Bipolar plates (BPs) are one of the key components of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stacks. To ensure that such a stack operates stably, a BP needs to meet exhibit electrical conductivity, heat conduction, H₂ airtight, flexural strength, and durability. Based on these requirements, the BP should also be as thin as possible to reduce the overall cost of PEMFCs, while improving their volumetric energy density. A composite bipolar plate (CBP) exhibits the advantages of a low production cost, low processing difficulty, and corrosion resistance; it is produced using polymers and graphite as the main materials. Moreover, channel structures can be formed directly after a compression molding process. However, the trade-off that exists between electrical conductivity and flexural strength is a major challenge. The electrical conductivity of a CBP is realized through the network formed by graphite materials. Therefore, it not only depends on the filler concentration, but also on the network structure. At the same time, microstructures such as accumulation polymers and graphite/resin interface are directly related to the gas tightness and flexural strength of CBP. This review summarizes the conductive fillers and polymers that are commonly used for fabricating CBPs. The universal modification methods for both (fillers and polymers) are discussed, and a brief description of the conductive theoretical model has also been included. In addition, the advanced production technology of CBP is summarized, which includes the organization of the conductive network, elimination of the polymer on the plate surface, and preparation technology of the layered plates. The relationship between the production process and the performance of the plate was also analyzed. Some studies indicate that the conductive network can be optimized by combining kinds of carbon-based filler or electric field inducing, which could significantly promote the electrical conductivity of CBP. Flexural strength and H₂ permeation rates were increased by introducing carbon-based materials such as carbon fabric and graphite foil. The modification of the filler and polymer could facilitate their bonding with each other, which reduces agglomeration and increases the performance. It is worth noting that the structure had a notable influence on the performance of CBP, which was reflected in the filler/polymer interface or the hybrid layer structure. Based on this results, some ideas have been provided as the next steps that can be taken for the optimization and production of a CBP. We believe that the optimization of the CBP structure will be the key point for its future research.

Key words: Composite bipolar plate, Electrical conductivity, Flexural strength, Production technology, Structure

Runlin Fan, Yuhang Peng, Hao Tian, Junsheng Zheng, Pingwen Ming, Cunman Zhang. Graphite-Filled Composite Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells: Material, Structure, and Performance[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(9), 2009095. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009095

Figures/Tables 19

Fig 1

Table 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Table 2

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14

Fig 15

Fig 16

Fig 17

References 117

1	Mah A. X. Y. ; Ho W. S. ; Bong C. P. C. ; Hassim M. H. ; Liew P. Y. ; Asli U. A. ; Kamaruddin M. J. ; Chemmangattuvalappil N. G. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2019, 44, 5661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.077
2	Liu B. ; Liu S. ; Guo S. ; Zhang S. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2020, 42, 1385. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.056
3	Garcia D. A. ; Barbanera F. ; Cumo F. ; Matteo U. D. ; Nastasi B. Energies 2016, 9, 963. doi: 10.3390/en9110963
4	Sinigaglia T. ; Lewiski F. ; Martins M. E. S. ; Siluk J. C. M. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2017, 42, 24597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.063
5	Liu J. ; Zhong C. F. Energy of China 2019, 41, 32.
	刘坚; 钟财富. 中国能源, 2019, 41, 32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2355.2019.02.007
6	Badea G. ; Naghiu G. S. ; Giurca I. ; Aşchilean I. ; Megyesi E. Energy Procedia 2017, 112, 418. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1097
7	Vincent I. ; Bessarabov D. Renew Sust. Energ. Rev. 2018, 81, 1690. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.258
8	Møllera K. T. ; Jensena T. R. ; Akibab E. ; Li H. W. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. 2017, 27, 34. doi: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.014
9	Marchenko O. V. ; Solomin S. V. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2017, 42, 9361. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.076
10	Budak Y. ; Devrim Y. Energ. Convers. Manage 2018, 160, 486. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.01.077
11	Li Y. ; Yang J. ; Song J. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017, 67, 160. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.030
12	Li J. C. ; Wang Q. ; Jiang R. ; Wu A. M. ; Lin G. Q. ; Dong C. Mater. Rev. 2018, 32, 2584.
	李俊超; 王清; 蒋锐; 吴爱民; 林国强; 董闯. 材料导报, 2018, 32, 2584. doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1005-023X.2018.15.008
13	Dafalla A. M. ; Jiang F. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2018, 43, 2327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.033
14	Radzuan N. A. M. ; Sulong A. B. ; Somalu M. R. Sains. Malays 2019, 48, 669. doi: 10.17576/jsm-2019-4803-21
15	Leng Y. ; Ming P. ; Yang D. ; Zhang C. J. Power Sources 2020, 451, 227783. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227783
16	Liu F. ; Yi B. ; Xing D. ; Yu J. ; Zhang H. J. Membrane Sci. 2003, 212, 213. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00503-3
17	Kim M. ; Lim J. W. ; Kim K. H. ; Lee D. G. Compos. Struct. 2013, 96, 569. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.017
18	Singh R. S. ; Gautam A. ; Rai V. Front. Mater. Sci. 2019, 13, 217. doi: 10.1007/s11706-019-0465-0
19	Stein T. ; Ein-Eli Y. Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 2000007. doi: 10.1002/ente.202000007
20	Wang H. ; Turner J. A. Fuel Cells 2010, 10, 510. doi: 10.1002/fuce.200900187
21	Hermann A. ; Chaudhuri T. ; Spagnol P. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2005, 30, 1297. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.016
22	Li Y. ; Jia X. ; Zhang W. ; Fang C. ; Wang X. ; Qin F. ; Yamaura S. ; Yokoyama Y. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2013, 45, 2393. doi: 10.1007/s11661-013-2071-6
23	Liang P. ; Xu H. F. ; Liu M. ; Lu L. ; Fu J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2010, 26, 595.
	梁鹏; 徐洪峰; 刘明; 卢璐; 傅杰. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26, 595. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20100329
24	Wilberforce T. ; Ijaodola O. ; Ogungbemi E. ; Khatib F. N. ; Leslie T. ; El-Hassan Z. ; Thomposon J. ; Olabi A. G. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2019, 113, 109286. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109286
25	Vlaskin M. S. ; Grigorenko A. V. ; Shkolnikov E. I. ; Ilyukhin A. S. Surf. Rev. Lett. 2019, 26, 1950038. doi: 10.1142/S0218625X19500380
26	Qian Y. ; Xu J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2015, 31, 291.
	钱阳; 徐江. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31, 291. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201411262
27	Kim M. ; Lim J. W. ; Lee D. G. Compos. Struct. 2015, 119, 630. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.010
28	Ji S. ; Hwang Y. S. ; Park T. ; Lee Y. H. ; Paek J. Y. ; Chang I. ; Lee M. H. ; Cha S. W. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Man. 2012, 13, 2183. doi: 10.1007/s12541-012-0289-7
29	Tripathi B. P. ; Shahi V. K. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 945. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.12.005
30	Clingerman M. L. ; King J. A. ; Schulz K. H. ; Meyers J. D. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 83, 1341. doi: 10.1002/app.10014
31	Zakaria M. Y. ; Sulong A. B. ; Sahari J. ; Suherman H. Compos. Pt. B-Eng. 2015, 83, 75. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.034
32	Phuangngamphan M. ; Okhawilai M. ; Hiziroglu S. ; Rimdusit S. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47183. doi: 10.1002/app.47183
33	Kim M. ; Lim J. W. ; Lee D. G. Compos. Struct. 2018, 189, 79. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.01.067
34	Dweiri R. ; Suherman H. ; Sulong A. B. ; Al-Sharab J. F. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2018, 25, 1177. doi: 10.1515/secm-2017-0122
35	Akhtar M. N. ; Sulong A. B. ; Umer A. ; Yousaf A. B. ; Khan M. A. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 14457. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.059
36	Radzuan N. A. M. ; Zakaria M. Y. ; Sulong A. B. ; Sahari J. Compos. Pt. B-Eng. 2017, 110, 153. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.021
37	Chen H. ; Liu H. B. ; Xia X. H. ; Yang L. ; He Y. D. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2015, 32, 744.
	陈慧; 刘洪波; 夏笑虹; 杨丽; 何月德. 复合材料学报, 2015, 32, 744. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.201503.008
38	Suherman H. ; Sulong A. B. ; Sahari J. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 1277. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.07.059
39	Antunes R. A. ; Oliveira M. C. L. D. ; Ett G. ; Ett V. J.Power Sources 2011, 196, 2945. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.041
40	Petrach E. ; Abu-Isa I. ; Xia W. J. Compos. Mater. 2010, 44, 1665. doi: 10.1177/0021998309357088
41	Diaz J. ; Rigail-Cedeño A. ; Barzola-Monteses J. ; Espinoza-Andaluz M. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 1502. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.358
42	Jiang X. ; Drzal L. T. J. Power Sources 2012, 218, 297. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.001
43	Fukushima H. ; Drzal L. T. ; Rook B. P. ; Rich M. J. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2006, 85, 235. doi: 10.1007/s10973-005-7344-x
44	Biswas S. ; Fukushima H. ; Drzal L. T. Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2011, 42, 371. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.006
45	Kim M. ; Yu H. N. ; Lim J. W. ; Lee D. G. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2012, 37, 4300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.125
46	Lee H. E. ; Han S. H. ; Song S. A. ; Kim S. S. Compos. Struct. 2015, 134, 44. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.037
47	Naji A. ; Krause B. ; Pötschke P. ; Ameli A. Smart Mater. Struct. 2019, 28, 064004. doi: 10.1088/1361-665X/ab19cb
48	Wei T. ; Song L. ; Zheng C. ; Wang K. ; Yan J. ; Shao B. ; Fan Z. J. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 2376. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.07.061
49	Yu H. N. ; Lim J. W. ; Suh J. D. ; Lee D. G. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 9868. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.102
50	Hwang I. U. ; Yu H. N. ; Kim S. S. ; Lee D. G. ; Suh J. D. ; Lee S. H. ; Ahn B. K. ; Kim S. H. ; Lim T. W. J. Power Sources 2008, 184, 90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.05.088
51	Kang K. ; Park S. ; Jo A. ; Lee K. ; Ju H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2017, 42, 1691. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.027
52	Yao K; Adams. ; D. L. ; Hao A. ; Zheng J. P. ; Liang R. ECS Trans. 2017, 77, 1303. doi: 10.1149/07711.1303ecst
53	Kim J. W. ; Kim N. H. ; Kuilla T. ; Kim T. J. ; Rhee K. Y. ; Lee J. H. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 5474. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.083
54	Kim K. H. ; Lim J. W. ; Kim M. ; Lee D. G. Compos. Struct. 2013, 98, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.043
55	Di J. T. ; Hu D. M. ; Chen H. Y. ; Yong Z. Z. ; Chen M. H. ; Feng Z. H. ; Zhu Y. T. ; Li Q. W. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5457. doi: 10.1021/nn301321j
56	Yao K. ; Adams D. ; Hao A. ; Zheng J. P. ; Liang Z. Y. ; Nguyen N. Energ. Fuel 2017, 31, 14320. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02678
57	Fiedler B. ; Gojny F. H. ; Wichmann M. H. G. ; Nolte M. C. M. ; Schulte K. J. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 3115. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.014
58	Sham M. L. ; Kim J. K. Carbon 2006, 44, 768. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.09.013
59	Yin Q. ; Sun K. N. ; Li A. J. ; Shao L. ; Liu S. M. ; Sun C. J Power Sources 2008, 175, 861. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.013
60	Athmouni N. ; Mighri F. ; Elkoun S. Polym. Advan. Technol. 2018, 29, 294. doi: 10.1002/pat.4114
61	Lee M. H. ; Kim H. Y. ; Kim J. ; Han J. T. ; Lee Y. S. ; Woo J. S. Carbon Lett. 2019, 30, 345. doi: 10.1007/s42823-019-00103-2
62	Liao S. H. ; Weng C. C. ; Yen C. Y. ; Hsiao M. C. ; Ma C. C. M. ; Tsai M. C. ; Su A. ; Yen M. Y. ; Lin Y. F. ; Liu P. L. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 263. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.06.064
63	Li J. ; Vaisman L. ; Marom G. ; Kim J. K. Carbon 2007, 45, 744. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.031
64	Matsumoto R. ; Okabe Y. Synthetic Met. 2016, 222, 351. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.11.020
65	Kalaitzidou K. ; Fukushima H. ; Drzal L. Materials 2010, 3, 1089. doi: 10.3390/ma3021089
66	Taherian R. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016, 123, 17. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.029
67	Radzuan M. ; Afiqah N. ; Sulong A. B. ; Sahari J. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2017, 42, 9262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.045
68	Mclachlan D. S. ; Blaszkiewicz M. ; Newnham R. E. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 2187. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb07576.x
69	Mamunya E. P. ; Davidenko V. V. ; Lebedev E. V. Compos. Interface 2012, 4, 169. doi: 10.1163/156855497x00145
70	Nielsen L. E. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1974, 13, 17. doi: 10.1021/i160049a004
71	Lee D. ; Lee D. G. J. Power Sources 2016, 327, 119. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.045
72	Ouyang T. ; Yin S. F. ; Xie Z. Y. ; Gao P. P. ; Tao T. ; Huang Q. Z. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2018, 35, 2950.
	欧阳涛; 尹绍峰; 谢志勇; 高平平; 陶韬; 黄启忠. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35, 2950. doi: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20180316.002
73	San F. G. B. ; Tekin G. Int. J. Energ. Res. 2013, 37, 283. doi: 10.1002/er.3005
74	Dweiri R. ; Sahari J. J. Power Sources 2007, 171, 424. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.106
75	Mahyoedin Y. ; Sahari J. ; Mukhtar A. ; Mohammad N. Suryadimal. MATEC Web of Conferences 2018, 248, 01007. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201824801007
76	Lim J. W. ; Kim M. ; Yu Y. H. ; Lee D. G. Compos. Struct 2014, 118, 519. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.011
77	Martins J. N. ; Kersch M. ; Altstädt V. ; Oliveira R. V. B. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 1511. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.10.001
78	Ansari S. ; Giannelis E. P. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phy. 2009, 47, 888. doi: 10.1002/polb.21695
79	Liao S. H. ; Yen C. Y. ; Weng C. C. ; Lin Y. F. ; Ma C. C. M. ; Yang C. H. ; Tsai M. C. ; Yen M. Y. ; Hsiao M. C. ; Lee S.J. J. Power Sources 2008, 185, 1225. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.097
80	Adloo A. ; Sadeghi M. ; Masoomi M. ; Pazhooh H. N. Renew. Energ. 2016, 99, 867. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.062
81	Caglar B. ; Fischer P. ; Kauranen P. ; Karttunen M. ; Elsner P. J. Power Sources 2014, 256, 88. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.060
82	Lee M. H. ; Kim H. Y. ; Oh S. M. ; Kim B. C. ; Bang D. ; Han J. T. ; Woo J. S. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2018, 43, 21918. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.104
83	Hopmann C. ; Windeck C. ; Cohnen A. ; Onken J. ; Krause B. ; Pötschke P. ; Hickmann T. AIP Conference Proceedings 2016, 1779, 030017. doi: 10.1063/1.4965487
84	Yeetsorn R. ; Fowler M. ; Tzoganakis C. ; Yuhua W. ; Taylor M. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 264, 34. doi: 10.1002/masy.200850406
85	Alo O. A. ; Otunniyi I. O. ; Pienaar H. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 3364. doi: 10.1002/pc.25625
86	Simaafrookhteh S. ; Khorshidian M. ; Momenifar M. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2020, 45, 14119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.03.105
87	Park H. J. ; Woo J. S. ; Kim S. H. ; Park K. S. ; Park S. H. ; Park S. Y. Macromol. Res. 2019, 27, 1161. doi: 10.1007/s13233-019-7156-7
88	Liao W. ; Jiang F. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhou X. ; He Z. Renew. Energ. 2020, 152, 1310. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.01.155
89	Kim S. H. ; Woo J. S. ; Park S. Y. Macromol. Res. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13233-020-8140-y
90	Radzuan M. ; Afiqah N. ; Sulong A. B. ; Somalu M. R. ; Abdullah A. T. ; Husaini T. ; Rosli R. E. ; Majlan E. H. ; Rosli M. I. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2019, 44, 30618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.063
91	Huang J. ; Rodrigue D. Mater. Design 2014, 55, 653. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.039
92	Martin C. A. ; Sandler J. K. W. ; Windle A. H. ; Schwarz M. K. ; Bauhofer W. ; Schulte K. ; Shaffer M. S. P. Polymer 2005, 46, 877. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.081
93	Senis E. C. ; Golosnoy I. O. ; Andritsch T. ; Dulieu-Barton J. M. ; Thomsen O. T. Polym. Compos. 2020, 41, 3510. doi: 10.1002/pc.25637
94	Gupta P. ; Rajput M. ; Singla N. ; Kumar V. ; Lahiri D. Polymer 2016, 89, 119. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.025
95	Wang Q. ; Dai J. ; Li W. ; Wei Z. ; Jiang J. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 1644. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.024
96	Ma C. G. ; Liu H. Y. ; Du X. S. ; Mach L. T. ; Xu F. ; Mai Y. W. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2015, 114, 126. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.007
97	Tanabi H. ; Erdal M. Results Phys. 2019, 12, 486. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.081
98	Liu N. ; Liu Y. Z. ; Zhao Y. L. ; Liu Y. T. ; Lan Q. ; Qin J. ; Song Z. P. ; Zhan H. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 467264. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b15462
99	Zabihi O. ; Shafei S. ; Fakhrhoseini S. M. ; Ahmadi M. ; Nazarloo H. A. ; Stanger R. ; Tran Q. A. ; Lucas J. ; Wall T. ; Naebe M. Materials 2019, 12, 1281. doi: 10.3390/ma12081281
100	Sen R. ; Zhao B. ; Perea D. ; Itkis M. E. ; Hu H. ; Love J. ; Bekyarova E. ; Haddon R. C. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 459. doi: 10.1021/nl035135s
101	Avasarala B. ; Haldar P. J. Power Sources 2009, 188, 225. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.063
102	Lee D. ; Lee D. G. Compos. Struct. 2016, 140, 77. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.066
103	Lee D. ; Lee D. G. ; Lim J. W. J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str. 2017, 29, 3386. doi: 10.1177/1045389x17708345
104	Yu H. N. ; Lim J. W. ; Kim M. K. ; Lee D. G. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 1911. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.12.024
105	Li B. ; Liu D. ; Li G. ; Yang X. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 15939. doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2753-y
106	Ang K. K. ; Ahmed K. S. Compos. Pt. B-Eng. 2013, 50, 7. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.01.016
107	Xu F. ; Liu H. Y. ; Du X. Polumers 2018, 10, 863. doi: 10.3390/polym10060683
108	Naya F. ; Molina-Aldareguia J. ; Lopes C. S. ; González C. ; Llorca J. J. Miner. Met. Mater. Soc. 2016, 69, 13. doi: 10.1007/s11837-016-2128-2
109	Paul R. ; Dai L. Compos. Interface 2018, 25, 539. doi: 10.1080/09276440.2018.1439632
110	Xiong Y. H. ; Wu H. ; Gao J. S. ; Chen W. ; Zhang J. C. ; Yue Y. N. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35, 1150.
	熊扬恒; 吴昊; 高建树; 陈文; 张景超; 岳亚楠. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35, 1150. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201901002
111	Wang Y. ; Zhan H. F. ; Xiang Y. ; Yang C. ; Wang C. M. ; Zhang Y. Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 12731. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02920
112	Jia M. D. ; Pememann K. V. ; Behlmg R. D. J. Membrane Sci. 1992, 73, 199. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(92)80122-Z
113	Takahashi S. ; Paul D. R. Polyer 2006, 47, 7519. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.029
114	Wang M. ; Wang Z. ; Li N. ; Liao J. Y. ; Zhao S. ; Wang J. X. ; Wang S. C. J. Membrane Sci. 2015, 495, 252. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.019
115	Du C. ; Ming P. ; Hou M. ; Fu J. ; Fu Y. ; Luo X. ; Shen Q. ; Shao Z. ; Yi B. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 5312. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.005
116	Kim M. Y. ; Choi S. W. ; Boo S. J. ; Lee J. H. ; Noh H. S. ; Kim H. S. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 8055. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2015.11245
117	Guo J. ; Zhang Q. J. ; Gao L. ; Zhong W. H. ; Sui G. ; Yang X. P. Compos. Pt. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 95, 294. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.021

Properties of bipolar plate	Requirement values
Cost	3 $·kW^-1
Weight	0.4 kg·kW^-1
Hydrogen permeation coefficient	< 1.3 × 10^–14 cm³·s^-1·cm^-2·Pa^-1
	@80 ℃, 3.04 × 10⁵ Pa, 100% RH
Electrical conductivity	> 100 S·cm^-1
thermal conductivity	> 10 W·m^-1·K^-1
Cathode corrosion current density	< 1 μA·cm^-2
Interfacial contact resistance	< 10 mΩ·cm²
Flexural strength	> 25 MPa

Polymer	Density/(g·cm^-3)	T_g/℃	T_m/℃	T_process/℃	HDT/℃	Flexibility/GPa	Shrinkage/%
LDPE	0.917–0.94	-110	115	180–240	40–50	0.245–0.33	2–4
HDPE	0.94–0.97	-110	135	200–300	60–90	0.75–1.575	1.5–4
PP	0.9–0.91	-10	170	180–300	100–120	1.2–1.6	1–3
PET	1.3–1.4	73–78	260	270–290	75–115	2.8–3.5	0.2–3
PEI	1.27–1.3	215	370	370–400	195–210	3–3.4	0.7–0.8
PEEK	1.26–1.32	145	343	370–420	150–160 (@1.8 MPa)	3.7–4	1.2–1.5
PVDF	1.7–1.8	-42 – -25	177	190–280	70–150	1.5–2	2–4
PPS	1.35	88–93	280	300–350	140–160	3.8–4.2	0.6–1.4

[1]	Chengcheng Zhang, Zhiyi Wu, Jiahui Shen, Le He, Wei Sun. Silicon Nanostructure Arrays: An Emerging Platform for Photothermal CO₂ Catalysis [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(1): 2304004-.
[2]	Lianlian Ji, Xianpeng Wang, Yingying Zhang, Xueli Shen, Di Xue, Lu Wang, Zi Wang, Wenchong Wang, Lizhen Huang, Lifeng Chi. In situ and Ex situ Investigation of the Organic-Organic Interface Effect [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(1): 2304002-.
[3]	Muhammad Faizan, Guoqi Zhao, Tianxu Zhang, Xiaoyu Wang, Xin He, Lijun Zhang. Elastic and Thermoelectric Properties of Vacancy Ordered Double Perovskites A₂BX₆: A DFT Study [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2024, 40(1): 2303004-.
[4]	Ning Wang, Yi Li, Qian Cui, Xiaoyue Sun, Yue Hu, Yunjun Luo, Ran Du. Metal Aerogels: Controlled Synthesis and Applications [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(9): 2212014-0.
[5]	Yaowu Luo, Dingsheng Wang. Enhancing Heterogeneous Catalysis by Electronic Property Regulation of Single Atom Catalysts [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(9): 2212020-0.
[6]	Fengyu Gao, Hengheng Liu, Xiaolong Yao, Zaharaddeen Sani, Xiaolong Tang, Ning Luo, Honghong Yi, Shunzheng Zhao, Qingjun Yu, Yuansong Zhou. Spherical Mn_xCo_3−xO_4−ƞ Spinel with Mn-Enriched Surface as High-Efficiency Catalysts for Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO_x by NH₃ [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(9): 2212003-0.
[7]	Shuai Chen, Chuang Yu, Qiyue Luo, Chaochao Wei, Liping Li, Guangshe Li, Shijie Cheng, Jia Xie. Research Progress of Lithium Metal Halide Solid Electrolytes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(8): 2210032-0.
[8]	Wenjie Zhou, Qihang Jing, Jiaxin Li, Yingzhi Chen, Guodong Hao, Lu-Ning Wang. Organic Photocatalysts for Solar Water Splitting: Molecular- and Aggregate-Level Modifications [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(5): 2211010-0.
[9]	Tianmi Tang, Zhenlu Wang, Jingqi Guan. Electronic Structure Regulation of Single-Site M-N-C Electrocatalysts for Carbon Dioxide Reduction [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(4): 2208033-0.
[10]	Jingwen Zhang, Hualong Ma, Jun Ma, Meixue Hu, Qihao Li, Sheng Chen, Tianshu Ning, Chuangxin Ge, Xi Liu, Li Xiao, Lin Zhuang, Yixiao Zhang, Liwei Chen. Cone Shaped Surface Array Structure on an Alkaline Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Improves Fuel Cell Performance [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(2): 2111037-0.
[11]	Yae Qi, Yongyao Xia. Electrolyte Regulation Strategies for Improving the Electrochemical Performance of Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Cathodes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(2): 2205045-0.
[12]	Zhen Liu, Xiangfu Meng, Wanmiao Gu, Jun Zha, Nan Yan, Qing You, Nan Xia, Hui Wang, Zhikun Wu. Introducing Novel, Multiple Cd Coordination Modes into Gold Nanoclusters by Combined Doping for Enhancing Electrocatalytic Performance [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(12): 2212064-.
[13]	Zheng-Min Wang, Qing-Ling Hong, Xiao-Hui Wang, Hao Huang, Yu Chen, Shu-Ni Li. RuP Nanoparticles Anchored on N-doped Graphene Aerogels for Hydrazine Oxidation-Boosted Hydrogen Production [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(12): 2303028-.
[14]	Shuyi Zheng, Jia Wu, Ke Wang, Mengchen Hu, Huan Wen, Shibin Yin. Electronic Modulation of Ni-Mo-O Porous Nanorods by Co Doping for Selective Oxidation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Coupled with Hydrogen Evolution [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(12): 2301032-.
[15]	Lijun Zhang, Youlin Wu, Noritatsu Tsubaki, Zhiliang Jin. 2D/3D S-Scheme Heterojunction Interface of CeO₂-Cu₂O Promotes Ordered Charge Transfer for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2023, 39(12): 2302051-.

Graphite-Filled Composite Bipolar Plates for Fuel Cells: Material, Structure, and Performance

RichHTML

PDF

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 19

References 117

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Recommended 0