Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 2211005.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202211005
• REVIEW • Previous Articles Next Articles
Research Progress of High-Voltage/Wide-Temperature-Range Aqueous Alkali Metal-Ion Batteries
Chenyang Chen1, Yongzhi Zhao1, Yuanyuan Li2,*(
), Jinping Liu1,*()
- 1 School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2 School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
-
Received:2022-11-03Accepted:2022-12-12Published:2022-12-19 -
Contact:Yuanyuan Li, Jinping Liu E-mail:liyynano@hust.edu.cn;liujp@whut.edu.cn -
Supported by:the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51972257);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52172229);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52072136);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2022IVA197);the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology)(2022-KF-20)
Cite this article
Chenyang Chen, Yongzhi Zhao, Yuanyuan Li, Jinping Liu. Research Progress of High-Voltage/Wide-Temperature-Range Aqueous Alkali Metal-Ion Batteries[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2023, 39(5), 2211005. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202211005
share this article
Fig 1
Overview of design principles for high voltage (left)/wide temperature range (right) aqueous electrolytes."
Fig 2
(a) Illustration of the evolution of the Li+ primary solvation sheath in diluted and water-in-salt solutions 18; (b) predicted reduction potentials of LiTFSI complexes from theoretical calculations 18; (c) illustration of expanded ESW for WIS electrolytes and the redox couples change of electrode caused by high salt concentration 18; (d) the ESW of WIBS and WIS electrolyte 28; (e) the ESW of the hydrate melt electrolyte and redox reaction potentials of LTO, LCO and LNMO 29; (f) the ESW of monohydrate melt as compared to dilute 1.0 mol∙L−1 LiPTFSI/H2O 30. (a–c) Adapted with permission from Ref. 18, Copyright 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science; (d) Adapted with permission from Ref. 28, Copyright 2016, Wiley-VCH; (e) Adapted with permission from Ref. 29, Copyright 2016, The Springer Nature; (f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 30, Copyright 2019, Elsevier."
Fig 3
In 21 m LiTFSI-0.1% (w) TMSB electrolytes, (a) TEM image for the HVLCO electrodes after the first cycle 38; (b) HOMO levels of TMSB, H2O, LiTFSI and TFSI− 38; (c) schematic of possible mechanisms for electrochemical oxidative decomposition of TMSB 38; snapshots of inner-Helmholtz interfacial regions of the anode surface at (d) 2.5 V and (e) 0.5 V vs. Li, respectively 40; (f) CV profiles of a graphite anode pre-coated with LiTFSI-HFE gel and a LiVPO4F cathode 40; (g) illustration of the evolution of SEI at 1.9 and 0.5 V (vs. Li+/Li) in WISE, 1.9 and 0.5 V (vs. Li+/Li) in WISE-PAM, respectively 41; (h) LSV curves of WISE and WISE-PAM based on stainless steel electrodes 41; (i) the viscosity and conductivity of WISE-AM electrolytes at 30 ℃ 42; (j) comparison of the rate performance in WISE, WISE-PAM and WISE-AM electrolytes 42. (a–c) Adapted with permission from Ref. 38, Copyright 2016, The Royal Society of Chemistry; (d–f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 40, Copyright 2017, Elsevier; (g–h) Adapted with permission from Ref. 41, Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH; (i–j) Adapted with permission from Ref. 42, Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH."
Fig 4
(a) Illustration of the Li+ primary solvation sheath in 1 m LiClO4 and 1LiClO4-3H2O-2urea electrolyte 27; TEM image of (b) LMO and (c) Mo6S8 after ten cycles 27; (d) stoichiometric amounts of urea, LiTFSI and H2O used to prepare 4.5 m electrolyte 44; (e) CV profiles of LTO, LMO and LiVPO4F in 4.5 m electrolytes 44; (f) schematic illustration of the formation of the inorganic/organic mixed SEI 44; (g) Ar ion sputtering XPS and TEM images of cycled Mo6S8 electrode in WIS-Ar electrolyte 46; (h) illustration of the evolution of SEI formation in CO2-SIW electrolytes 46; (i) the cycling performance of the LMO//Mo6S8 aqueous full-cell in CO2-SIW electrolytes at low temperature (−40 ℃) 46. (a–c) Adapted with permission from Ref. 27, Copyright 2020, WILEY-VCH; (d–f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 44, Copyright 2022, The Springer Nature; (g–i) Adapted with permission from Ref. 46, Copyright 2021, The Springer Nature."
Fig 5
(a) Representative liquid structure for the H1D1HANE 47; (b) reduction potentials of DMC-2Li+ complexes from theoretical calculations 47; (c) schematic illustration of the anode SEI formation in HANE 47; (d) snapshots of the interfacial regions at the cathode surface from MD simulations of the graphite|H1D1HANE interfaces 47; (e) ESW of the H1D1HANE and CVs of LTO and LNMO in H1D1HANE 47; (f) ESW of electrolytes and CVs of LTO and LMO obtained in WISE, BSiS-AN0.5 and BSiS-DOL0.5 electrolytes 48; (g) snapshots of the equilibrated electrolyte systems and the structure of the ion aggregations LiTFSI/(H2O)2.6/(AN)3.5 50. (a–e) Adapted with permission from Ref. 47, Copyright 2018, Elsevier; (f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 48, Copyright 2019, WILEY-VCH; (g) Adapted with permission from Ref. 50, Copyright 2019, WILEY-VCH."
Fig 6
(a, b) Normalized FTIR of a series of 2 m LiTFSI-xPEG-(1 − x)H2O electrolytes 51; (c) CVs collected in 2 m LiTFSI-94% PEG-6% H2O for LMO and L-LTO, the grey dashed line shows the ESW 51; (d) conductivity of 2 m LiTFSI-94% PEGDME-6% H2O and 2 m LiTFSI-94% PEG400-6% H2O 52; (e) schematic illustration of intermolecular interactions of H2O-crowding agent, crowding agent-crowding agent and H2O-H2O 52; (f) ESWs for various low-concentration and super-concentrated sugar solutions 53; (g) the hypothetical diagrams of solvation structures, (h) ionic conductivities and (i) ESW of the 12.5 m LiNO3 in H2O: PD and LWIS gel electrolytes 54. (a–c) Adapted with permission from Ref. 51, Copyright 2020, The Springer Nature; (d–e) Adapted with permission from Ref. 52, Copyright 2022, American Chemical Society; (f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 53, Copyright 2020, WILEY-VCH; (g–i) Adapted with permission from Ref. 54, Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH."
Fig 7
(a) Preparation of a MSM-based room-temperature DES 56; (b) liquid structure of MSM : LiClO4 : H2O = 2 : 1 : 1 DES electrolyte calculated from DFT 56; (c) the normalized FTIR spectra of 3.6 m LiTFSI/sulfolane-H2O(x: 8) electrolytes 57; (d) schematic illustration of the interaction between water and sulfolane 57; (e) FTIR spectra of Li-H2O-MUx (x = 0.00–0.65) solutions 59; (f) solution structures of Li-H2O-MU0.27 over a larger length scale 59. (a, b) Adapted with permission from Ref. 56, Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society; (c, d) Adapted with permission from Ref. 57, Copyright 2021, Elsevier.; (e, f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 59, Copyright 2022, Elsevier."
Table 1
High-voltage AABs achieved by electrolyte modification."
| Strategy | Electrolyte | ESW (V vs. Li/Na/K) | Ionic conductivity (mS∙cm−1)@.(℃) | Cathode//Anode | Output voltage (V) | Energy density* (Wh∙kg−1) | Ref. | |
| Highly Concentrated Salt | Li+ | 21 m LiTFSI | 3.0 (1.9–4.9) | 8.21@25 | LiMn2O4//Mo6S8 | 2.0 | 84 | |
| 21 m LiTFSI + 7 m LiOTf | 3.1 (1.8–4.9) | 6.5@25 | LiMn2O4//TiO2 | 2.1 | 100 | |||
| 19.4 m LiTFSI + 8.3 m LiBETI | 3.8 (1.2–5.0) | 3.0@30 | LiCoO2//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.35 | – | |||
| 22.2 m LiTFSI + 33.3 m LiPTFSI | 2.7 (2.3–5.0) | 0.1@25 | LiCoO2//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.4 | – | |||
| 40.4 m KOAc + 9.8 m LiOAc | 2.85 (1.55–4.4) | 25.2@25 | LiMn2O4//AC | 2.0 | 77.9 | |||
| 42 m LiTFSI + 21 m Me3EtN·TFSI | 3.25 (1.75–5.0） | 0.91@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.55 | 145 | |||
| 50 m LiTFSI + 25 m TMBTFSI | 3.25 | – | LiMn2O4//TiO2(B) | 2.35 | 150 | |||
| Na+ | 17 m NaClO4 | 2.8 (1.7–4.4) | 108@25 | Na4Fe3(PO4)2(P2O7)// NaTi2(PO4)3 | – | 36 | ||
| 17 m NaClO4 + 2 m NaOTF | 2.8 (1.6–4.4) | 95.25@25 | Na3V2(PO4)3// Na3V2(PO4)3 | 1.75 | 70 | |||
| 32 m KOAc + 8 m NaOAc | 2.4 (0.7–3.1) | 12@25 | Na2VTi(PO4)3// Na2VTi(PO4)3 | 1.13 | – | |||
| 9 m NaOTF + 22 m TEAOTF | 3.3 (0.8–4.1) | 11.2@25 | Na1.88Mn[Fe(CN)6]0.97∙1.35H2O//NaTiOPO4 | – | – | |||
| Na(PTFSI)0.65(TFSI)0.14 (OTf)0.21∙3H2O | 2.7 (1.9–4.6) | 14@25 | Na3V2(PO4)2F3// NaTi2(PO4)3 | 1.75 | 77.9 | |||
| 35 m NaFSI | 2.6 (1.8–4.4) | 8@25 | Na3(VOPO4)2F// NaTi2(PO4)3 | – | – | |||
| K+ | 30 m KFSI | 3.97 (1.14–5.11) | – | K1.85Fe0.33Mn0.67 [Fe(CN)6]0.98∙ 0.77H2O//β-PTCDA | ||||
| K(PTFSI)0.12(TFSI)0.08 (OTf)0.8∙2H2O | 2.5 (2.1–4.6) | 34.6@25 | – | – | – | |||
| 61.7 m K(FSI)0.55(OTf)0.45∙ 0.9H2O | 2.7 (2.1–4.8) | 12@25 | KVPO4F// NaTi2(PO4)3 | 3.0 | – | |||
| 37 m KFSI | 2.8 (1.6–4.4) | 23.12@25 | AC//AC | 2.3 | 20.5 | |||
| Additive | Li+ | Urea-LiClO4 | 3.6 (1.2–4.8) | – | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.3 | 140 | |
| 0.1wt% TMSB- 21 m LiTFSI | 3.0 | – | LiCoO2/Mo6S8 | 2.5 | 120 | |||
| HFE gel-21 m LiTFSI + 7 m LiOTf | 4.9 (0–4.9) | – | LiVPO4F//Graphite | 4.0 | ~400 | |||
| 5% PAM-21 m LiTFSI | 3.1 (1.8–4.9) | 6.5@30 | LiMn2O4//L-TiO2 | – | – | |||
| 5% AM-21 m LiTFSI | 3.1 (1.8–4.9) | 9.6@25 | LiMn2O4//L-TiO2 | – | – | |||
| Urea-LiTFSI | 3.3 (1.5–4.8) | 1@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.5 | - | |||
| CO2-5 m LiTFSI | 3.08 (1.67–4.75) | 54.6@25 | LiMn2O4/Mo6S8 | – | – | |||
| Urea-LiClO4 | 3.2 | 26@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.2 | 135 | |||
| Co-solvent | Li+ | DMC-LiTFSI | 4.1 (1.0–5.1) | 5.0@25 | LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4// Li4Ti5O12 | 3.2 | 165 | |
| AN-LiTFSI | 4.5 (0.7–5.2) | 3.27@30 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.55 | 109 | |||
| TEGDME-LiTFSI | 4.2 (0.6–4.8) | 0.625@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.5 | 120 | |||
| PEG(400)-LiTFSI | 3.2 (1.3–4.5) | 0.8@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.5 | 75–100 | |||
| PEGDME(450)-LiTFSI | 3.2 (1.3–4.5) | 2.4@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.5 | – | |||
| PD-LiNO3 | 2.9 (2.2–5.2) | 22.8@25 | LiMn2O4//Mo6S8 | – | – | |||
| MSM-LiClO4 | 3.5 (1.6–5.1) | 3.71@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.6 | – | |||
| Sulfolane-LiTFSI | 3.4 (1.3–4.7) | 2.5@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.5 | 141 | |||
| TMS-LiTFSI | 5.4 (0.3–5.7) | 0.41@25 | LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4// Li4Ti5O12 | 3.15 | 136 | |||
| MU-LiTFSI | 4.5 (0.5 – 5.0) | 3.2@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | – | – | |||
| DOL-LiTFSI | 4.7 (0.3 – 5.0) | 7.09@60 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | – | – | |||
| SL-LiClO4 | 3.8 (1.1–4.9) | 3.74@25 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 2.45 | 71 | |||
| Na+ | Urea-DMF-NaClO4 | 2.8 (1.1–3.9) | 8.1@20 | NiHCF//NaTi2(PO4)3 | – | – | ||
| Sugar-NaNO3 | 2.812 | 8.536@25 | – | – | – | |||
| TMP-NaClO4 | 3.0 (1.2–4.2) | 23@25 | – | – | – | |||
| DMSO-NaClO4 | 3.1 (1.0–4.1) | – | Na3V2(PO4)3// Na3V2(PO4)3 | 1.7 | – |
Fig 8
(a) Discharge capacities of LCO in sat. LiCl, sat. LiNO3, sat. Li2SO4 at different temperatures 77; (b) photograph of the AEE and control electrolytes at −40 ℃ 80; (c) phase diagram of the LiTFSI-H2O binary mixtures 80; (d) the ionic conductivity of 3.86 m CaCl2 + 1 m NaClO4 electrolyte at different temperatures 82. (a) Adapted with permission from Ref. 77, Copyright 2018, WILEY-VCH; (b, c) Adapted with permission from Ref. 80, Copyright 2020, Elsevier; (d) Adapted with permission from Ref. 82, Copyright 2022, Wiley-VCH."
Fig 9
(a) DSC analysis of electrolyte with different amounts of anti-freezing additives (EG) 86; (b) the ionic conductivity of a 1 mol∙L−1 Li2SO4 aqueous electrolyte with different amounts of anti-freezing additives (EG) at −20 ℃ 86; (c) DSC curve of 12SL-4H2O-3LiClO4 electrolyte 68; (d) GCD curves at different temperatures for LMO//LTO full battery in the 12SL-4H2O-3LiClO4 electrolyte 68; (e) photographs of WISE, BSiS-D0.28, and BSiS-A0.5 electrolytes at 0 and −20 ℃ 48; (f) ionic conductivity of BSiS-D0.28 and BSiS-A0.5 hybrid electrolytes in temperature range of −20 to 60 ℃ 48. (a, b) Adapted with permission from Ref. 86, Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society; (c, d) Adapted with permission from Ref. 68, Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH; (e, f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 48, Copyright 2019, WILEY-VCH"
Fig 10
(a) Ionic conductivity of electrolytes over a wide temperature range 67; (b) DSC curves of BSiS-AN0.5 and BSiS-DOL0.5 hybrid electrolytes from −140 to 60 ℃ 67; (c) optimized structures and solvation energy of Li+-H2O and Li+-DOL from DFT calculations 67; (d) Arrhenius behavior of the temperature-dependent of RCT in LMO/LTO cells in BSiS-AN0.5 and BSiS-DOL0.5 hybrid electrolytes and the calculated Ea 67; (e) local structure of 2 m NaClO4-DMSOx=0.3 electrolyte from MD simulations 69; (f) temperature-dependent ionic conductivity in 2 m NaClO4-DMSOx=0.3 69. (a–d) Adapted with permission from Ref. 67, Copyright 2021, Elsevier; (e, f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 69, Copyright 2019, WILEY-VCH."
Fig 11
(a) Molecular structures of betaine and proline 91; (b) proposed Li+ migration mechanism in polySH electrolyte, where hydrated Li+ hopping through SO3− sites 93; (c) ionic conductivity of polySH, polyHEA, and PVA electrolyte 93; (d) DSC results of polySH electrolytes with different LiCl concentrations 93; (e) ionic conductivities of polySH electrolytes at different temperatures 93; (f) schematic illustration of the preparation of OHEC 94. (a) Adapted with permission from Ref. 91, Copyright 2019, WILEY-VCH; (b–e) Adapted with permission from Ref. 93, Copyright 2021, Wiley-VCH; (f) Adapted with permission from Ref. 94, Copyright 2020, Wiley-VCH."
Table 2
Wide-temperature-range AABs achieved by electrolyte modification."
| Strategy | Electrolyte | Freezing point (℃) | Ionic conductivity (mS∙cm−1)@.(℃) | Cathode//Anode | Capacity retention (%)@.(℃) | Ref. | |
| Highly Concentrated Salt | Li+ | 40.4 m KOAc + 9.8 m LiOAc | ~ −30 | 1.2@−30 | LiMn2O4//AC | 60@−20 | |
| 5.2 m LiTFSI | < −40 | 1.8@−40 | LiCoO2//Li4Ti5O12 | 66.49@−40 | |||
| Saturated LiCl | ~ −50 | - | LiCoO₂ (Three-electrode system) | 72@−40 | |||
| 21 m LiTFSI | - | LiMn2O4//TiO2 | 79@0 | ||||
| LiCl-P(SBMA-co-HEA) Gel | - | 12.6@−40 | AC//AC | 78@−30 | |||
| Li2SO4-EMIMBF4- PVA/Agar Gel | - | - | AC//AC | 90@−30 | |||
| LiCl/KCl-CG/PAM Gel | - | 19@−40 | AC//AC | 78.9@−40 | |||
| LiTFSI-ARS-PAM Gel | - | 4@−15 | MnO2//MnO2 | 72.5@−15 | |||
| NaCl-Li2SO4- CS-P(AM-co-AA) Gel | < −41 | 36@−20 | Ti3C2Tx MXene//CNTs | 50.5@−20 | |||
| Na+ | 2 m NaClO4 | < −20 | 3.49 | Ni(OH)2//NaTi2(PO4)3 | 85@−20 | ||
| CaCl2-NaClO4 | < −100 | 7.13@−50 | Na2CoFe(CN)6//AC | 64.8@−30 | |||
| K+ | 22 mol∙L−1 KCF3SO3 | - | 10@−20 | K1.85Fe0.33Mn0.67[Fe(CN)6]0.98 ·0.77H2O//PTCDI | 76.3@−20 | ||
| Co-solvent | Li+ | AN-LiTFSI | < −60 | 0.63@−60 | LiMn₂O₄//Li4Ti5O12 | 95@0 | |
| TMS-LiTFSI | < −85 | 1.03 × 10−4 @−80 | LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 86.1@−20 | |||
| DOL-LiTFSI | < −95 | – | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 52@−50 | |||
| SL-LiClO4 | ~ −110 | 0.05@−50 | LiMn2O4//Li4Ti5O12 | 98@−20 | |||
| EG-LiCl- P(AMPS-co-AM) Gel | - | 1.9@−20 | AC//AC | 71@−20 | |||
| EG-Li2SO4 | ~ −24.6 | 4.25@−20 | LiFePO4 (Three-electrode system) | 82@−20 | |||
| Gly-LiClO4-HPC/PVA Gel | - | 5.7@−40 | AC//AC | 73.75@−40 | |||
| EG-LiCl-PVA Gel | < −62.8 | 0.83@−40 | AC//AC | 68.3@−30 | |||
| EG-LiTFSI-PAM Gel | < −100 | 1.5@−40 | PANI//PANI | 70.4@−40 | |||
| Na+ | TMP-NaClO4 | – | - | aMEGO//aMEGO | 67.9@−20 | ||
| DMSO-NaClO4 | < −130 | 0.11@−50 | AC//NaTi2(PO4)3 | 60@−50 | |||
| AN-NaClO4 | - | 4.95@−50 | AC//AC | 86.5@−50 | |||
| MeOH-Na2SO4-SiO2 Gel | - | 0.07@−30 | AC//NaTi2(PO4)3 | 65.05@−30 |
Fig 12
Design requirements and strategies for high-voltage AABs with wide temperature range."
| 1 |
Wang L. N. ; Menakath A. ; Han F. D. ; Wang Y. ; Zavalij P. Y. ; Gaskell K. J. ; Borodino O. ; Iuga D. ; Brown S. P. ; Wang C. S. ; et al Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 789.
doi: 10.1038/s41557-019-0304-z |
| 2 |
Li L. P. ; Liu W. Y. ; Dong H. Y. ; Gui Q. Y. ; Hu Z. Q. ; Li Y. Y. ; Liu J. P. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2004959.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202004959 |
| 3 |
Liu W. Y. ; Yi C. J. ; Li L. P. ; Liu S. L. ; Gui Q. Y. ; Ba D. L. ; Li Y. Y. ; Peng D. L. ; Liu J. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 12931.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202101537 |
| 4 |
Liu Z. X. ; Huang Y. ; Huang Y. ; Yang Q. ; Li X. L. ; Huang Z. D. ; Zhi C. Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 180.
doi: 10.1039/c9cs00131j |
| 5 |
Bin D. ; Wang F. ; Tamirat A. G. ; Suo L. M. ; Wang Y. G. ; Wang C. S. ; Xia Y. Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703008.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201703008 |
| 6 |
Chao D. L. ; Qiao S. Z. Joule 2020, 4, 1846.
doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.023 |
| 7 | Huang J. D. ; Zhu Y. H. ; Feng Y. ; Han Y. H. ; Gu Z. Y. ; Liu R. X. ; Yang D. Y. ; Chen K. ; Zhang X. Y. ; Sun W. ; et al Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2022, 38, 2208008. |
|
黄俊达; 朱宇辉; 冯煜; 韩叶虎; 谷振一; 刘日鑫; 杨冬月; 陈凯; 张相禹; 孙威; 等. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38, 2208008.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202208008 |
|
| 8 |
Dunn B. ; Kamath H. ; Tarascon J. M. Science 2011, 334, 928.
doi: 10.1126/science.1212741 |
| 9 |
Liu W. C. ; Liu W. Y. ; Jiang Y. Q. ; Gui Q. Y. ; Ba D. L. ; Li Y. Y. ; Liu J. P. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 1299.
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.0321001-8417/ |
| 10 | Liu W. Y. ; Li L. P. ; Gui Q. Y. ; Deng B. H. ; Li Y. Y. ; Liu J. P. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1904049. |
|
刘文燚; 栗林坡; 桂秋月; 邓伯华; 李园园; 刘金平. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1904049.
doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904049 |
|
| 11 |
Smith L. ; Dunn B. Science 2015, 350, 918.
doi: 10.1126/science.aad5575 |
| 12 |
Eftekhari A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801156.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801156 |
| 13 |
Luo J. Y. ; Cui W. J. ; He P. ; Xia Y. Y. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 760.
doi: 10.1038/nchem.763 |
| 14 |
Xie J. ; Guan Y. P. ; Huang Y. Q. ; Lu Y. C. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 5176.
doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00722 |
| 15 |
Jabeen N. ; Hussain A. ; Xia Q. Y. ; Sun S. ; Zhu J. W. ; Xia H. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700804.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201700804 |
| 16 |
Zuo W. H. ; Xie C. Y. ; Xu P. ; Li Y. Y. ; Liu J. P. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703463.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201703463 |
| 17 |
Panayotov D. A. ; Frenkel A. I. ; Morris J. R. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1223.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00189 |
| 18 |
Suo L. M. ; Borodin O. ; Gao T. ; Olguin M. ; Ho J. ; Fan X. L. ; Luo C. ; Wang C. S. ; Xu K. Science 2015, 350, 938.
doi: 10.1126/science.aab1595 |
| 19 |
Pipolo S. ; Salanne M. ; Ferlat G. ; Klotz S. ; Saitta A. M. ; Pietrucci F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 245701.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.245701 |
| 20 |
Chen M. H. ; Xie S. A. ; Zhao X. Y. ; Zhou W. H. ; Li Y. ; Zhang J. W. ; Chen Z. ; Chao D. L. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 51, 683.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.052 |
| 21 |
Li W. ; Dahn J. R. ; Wainwright D. S. Science 1994, 264, 1115.
doi: 10.1126/science.264.5162.1115 |
| 22 |
Xu K. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11503.
doi: 10.1021/cr500003w |
| 23 |
Goodenough J. B. ; Park K. -S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167.
doi: 10.1021/ja3091438 |
| 24 |
Suo L. M. ; Borodin O. ; Wang Y. S. ; Rong X. H. ; Sun W. ; Fan X. L. ; Xu S. Y. ; Schroeder M. A. ; Cresce A. V. ; Wang F. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1701189.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201701189 |
| 25 |
Borodin O. ; Suo L. M. ; Gobet M. ; Ren X. M. ; Wang F. ; Faraone A. ; Peng J. ; Olguin M. ; Schroeder M. ; Ding M. S. ; et al ACS Nano 2017, 11, 10462.
doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b05664 |
| 26 |
Dubouis N. ; Lemaire P. ; Mirvaux B. ; Salager E. ; Deschamps M. ; Grimaud A. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 3491.
doi: 10.1039/c8ee02456a |
| 27 |
Hou Z. G. ; Dong M. F. ; Xiong Y. L. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Zhu Y. C. ; Qian Y. T. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903665.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903665 |
| 28 |
Suo L. M. ; Borodin O. ; Sun W. ; Fan X. L. ; Yang C. Y. ; Wang F. ; Gao T. ; Ma Z. H. ; Schroeder M. ; von Cresce A. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7136.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201602397 |
| 29 |
Yamada Y. ; Usui K. ; Sodeyama K. ; Ko S. ; Tateyama Y. ; Yamada A. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 1.
doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.129 |
| 30 |
Ko S. ; Yamada Y. ; Miyazaki K. ; Shimada T. ; Watanabe E. ; Tateyama Y. ; Kamiya T. ; Honda T. ; Akikusa J. ; Yamadaa A. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 104, 106488.
doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.106488 |
| 31 |
Deng W. J. ; Wang X. S. ; Liu C. Y. ; Li C. ; Chen J. T. ; Zhu N. ; Li R. ; Xue M. Q. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 20, 373.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.023 |
| 32 |
Chen L. ; Zhang J. X. ; Li Q. ; Vatamanu J. ; Ji X. ; Pollard T. P. ; Cui C. Y. ; Hou S. ; Chen J. ; Yang C. Y. ; et al ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 968.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00348 |
| 33 |
Zhou A. X. ; Liu Y. ; Zhu X. Z. ; Li X. Y. ; Yue J. M. ; Ma X. G. ; Gu L. ; Hu Y. S. ; Li H. ; Huang X. J. ; et al Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 42, 438.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.07.046 |
| 34 |
Lee M. H. ; Kim S. J. ; Chang D. ; Kim J. ; Moon S. ; Oh K. ; Park K. Y. ; Seong W. M. ; Park H. ; Kwon G. ; et al Mater. Today 2019, 29, 26.
doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.02.004 |
| 35 |
Jin T. ; Ji X. ; Wang P. F. ; Zhu K. J. ; Zhang J. X. ; Cao L. S. ; Chen L. ; Cui C. Y. ; Deng T. ; Liu S. F. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 11943.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202017167 |
| 36 |
Chen H. ; Zhang Z. Y. ; Wei Z. X. ; Chen G. ; Yang X. ; Wang C. Z. ; Du F. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 128.
doi: 10.1039/c9se00545e |
| 37 |
Han J. ; Mariani A. ; Zhang H. ; Zarrabeitia M. ; Gao X. P. ; Carvalho D. V. ; Varzi A. ; Passerini S. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 30, 196.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.028 |
| 38 |
Wang F. ; Lin Y. X. ; Suo L. M. ; Fan X. L. ; Gao T. ; Yang C. Y. ; Han F. D. ; Qi Y. ; Xu K. ; Wang C. S. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3666.
doi: 10.1039/c6ee02604d |
| 39 |
Kidanu W. G. ; Vo T. N. ; So S. ; Hur J. ; Kim I. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 553, 149496.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149496 |
| 40 |
Yang C. Y. ; Chen J. ; Qing T. T. ; Fan X. L. ; Sun W. ; von Cresce A. ; Ding M. S. ; Borodin O. ; Vatamanu J. ; Schroeder M. A. ; et al Joule 2017, 1, 122.
doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.009 |
| 41 |
Hou X. ; Wang R. ; He X. ; Pollard T. P. ; Ju X. K. ; Du L. L. ; Paillard E. ; Frielinghaus H. ; Barnsley L. C. ; Borodin O. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22812.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202107252 |
| 42 |
Hou X. ; Pollard T. P. ; Zhao W. G. ; He X. ; Ju X. K. ; Wang J. ; Du L. L. ; Paillard E. ; Lin H. ; Xu K. ; et al Small 2022, 18, 2104986.
doi: 10.1002/smll.202104986 |
| 43 |
Ao H. S. ; Chen C. Y. ; Hou Z. G. ; Cai W. L. ; Liu M. K. ; Jin Y. A. ; Zhang X. ; Zhu Y. C. ; Qian Y. T. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 14190.
doi: 10.1039/d0ta04800c |
| 44 |
Xu J. J. ; Ji X. ; Zhang J. X. ; Yang C. Y. ; Wang P. F. ; Liu S. F. ; Ludwig K. ; Chen F. ; Kofinas P. ; Wang C. S. Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 186.
doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00977-5 |
| 45 |
Vedhanarayanan B. ; Ji X. B. ; Lakshmi K. C. S. ; Lin T. W. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 130966.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130966 |
| 46 |
Yue J. M. ; Zhang J. K. ; Tong Y. X. ; Chen M. ; Liu L. L. ; Jiang L. W. ; Lv T. S. ; Hu Y. S. ; Li H. ; Huang X. J. ; et al Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 1061.
doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00787-y |
| 47 |
Wang F. ; Borodin O. ; Ding M. S. ; Gobet M. ; Vatamanu J. ; Fan X. L. ; Gao T. ; Edison N. ; Liang Y. J. ; Sun W. ; et al Joule 2018, 2, 927.
doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.011 |
| 48 |
Chen J. W. ; Vatamanu J. ; Xing L. D. ; Borodin O. ; Chen H. Y. ; Guan X. C. ; Liu X. ; Xu K. ; Li W. S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1902654.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201902654 |
| 49 |
Shang Y. X. ; Chen N. ; Li Y. J. ; Chen S. ; Lai J. N. ; Huang Y. X. ; Qu W. J. ; Wu F. ; Chen R. J. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004017.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202004017 |
| 50 |
Xiao D. W. ; Dou Q. Y. ; Zhang L. ; Ma Y. L. ; Shi S. Q. ; Lei S. L. ; Yu H. Y. ; Yan X. B. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904136.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201904136 |
| 51 |
Xie J. ; Liang Z. J. ; Lu Y. C. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 1006.
doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0667-y |
| 52 |
Dong D. J. ; Xie J. ; Liang Z. J. ; Lu Y. C. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 123.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02064 |
| 53 |
Bi H. B. ; Wang X. S. ; Liu H. L. ; He Y. L. ; Wang W. J. ; Deng W. J. ; Ma X. L. ; Wang Y. S. ; Rao W. ; Chai Y. Q. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2000074.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202000074 |
| 54 |
Jaumaux P. ; Yang X. ; Zhang B. ; Safaei J. ; Tang X. ; Zhou D. ; Wang C. S. ; Wang G. X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 19965.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202107389 |
| 55 |
Wu S. L. ; Su B. Z. ; Sun M. Z. ; Gu S. ; Lu Z. G. ; Zhang K. L. ; Yu D. Y. W. ; Huang B. L. ; Wang P. F. ; Lee C. S. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2102390.
doi: 10.1002/adma.202102390 |
| 56 |
Jiang P. ; Chen L. ; Shao H. Z. ; Huang S. H. ; Wang Q. S. ; Su Y. B. ; Yan X. S. ; Liang X. M. ; Zhang J. J. ; Feng J. W. ; et al ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 1419.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00968 |
| 57 |
Wang Y. ; Wang T. R. ; Dong D. J. ; Xie J. ; Guan Y. P. ; Huang Y. Q. ; Fan J. ; Lu Y. C. Matter 2022, 5, 162.
doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.10.021 |
| 58 |
Shang Y. X. ; Chen S. ; Chen N. ; Li Y. J. ; Lai J. N. ; Ma Y. ; Chen J. ; Wu F. ; Chen R. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 2653.
doi: 10.1039/d2ee00417h |
| 59 |
Lin R. ; Ke C. M. ; Chen J. ; Liu S. ; Wang J. H. Joule 2022, 6, 399.
doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.01.002 |
| 60 |
Han J. ; Zarrabeitia M. ; Mariani A. ; Jusys Z. ; Hekmatfar M. ; Zhang H. ; Geiger D. ; Kaiser U. ; Behm R. J. ; Varzi A. ; et al Nano Energy 2020, 77, 105176.
doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105176 |
| 61 |
Jiang L. W. ; Liu L. L. ; Yue J. M. ; Zhang Q. Q. ; Zhou A. X. ; Borodin O. ; Suo L. M. ; Li H. ; Chen L. Q. ; Xu K. ; et al Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1904427.
doi: 10.1002/adma.201904427 |
| 62 |
Zheng Q. F. ; Miura S. ; Miyazaki K. ; Ko S. ; Watanabe E. ; Okoshi M. ; Chou C. P. ; Nishimura Y. ; Nakai H. ; Kamiya T. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14202.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201908830 |
| 63 |
Kuhnel R. S. ; Reber D. ; Battaglia C. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 2005.
doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00623 |
| 64 |
Ko S. ; Yamada Y. ; Yamada A. Electrochem. Commun. 2020, 116, 106764.
doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106764 |
| 65 |
Zhang M. ; Wang W. J. ; Liang X. H. ; Li C. ; Deng W. J. ; Chen H. B. ; Li R. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 2217.
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.12.0171001-8417/ |
| 66 |
Zhang X. Q. ; Chen J. W. ; Xu Z. B. ; Dong Q. ; Ao H. S. ; Hou Z. G. ; Qian Y. T. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 46, 147.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.01.009 |
| 67 |
Ma Z. K. ; Chen J. W. ; Vatamanu J. ; Borodin O. ; Bedrov D. ; Zhou X. G. ; Zhang W. G. ; Li W. S. ; Xu K. ; Xing L. D. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 45, 903.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.045 |
| 68 |
Liu J. H. ; Yang C. ; Chi X. W. ; Wen B. ; Wang W. K. ; Liu Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2106811.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202106811 |
| 69 |
Nian Q. S. ; Wang J. Y. ; Liu S. ; Sun T. J. ; Zheng S. B. ; Zhang Y. ; Tao Z. L. ; Chen J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16994.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201908913 |
| 70 |
Sui Y. M. ; Yu M. L. ; Xu Y. K. ; Ji X. L. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 030537.
doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac53cd |
| 71 |
Abraham D. P. ; Heaton J. R. ; Kang S.-H. ; Dees D. W. ; Jansen A. N. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, A41.
doi: 10.1149/1.2801366 |
| 72 |
Sun T. J. ; Zheng S. B. ; Du H. H. ; Tao Z. L. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 204.
doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00733-0 |
| 73 |
Jiang L. ; Dong D. ; Lu Y. C. Nano Res. Energy 2022, 1, e9120003.
doi: 10.26599/NRE.2022.9120003 |
| 74 |
Rodrigues M. T. F. ; Babu G. ; Gullapalli H. ; Kalaga K. ; Sayed F. N. ; Kato K. ; Joyner J. ; Ajayan P. M. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17108.
doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.108 |
| 75 |
Feng Y. ; Zhou L. M. ; Ma H. ; Wu Z. H. ; Zhao Q. ; Li H. X. ; Zhang K. ; Chen J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 1711.
doi: 10.1039/d1ee03292e |
| 76 |
Wang H. ; Chen Z. ; Ji Z. ; Wang P. ; Wang J. ; Ling W. ; Huang Y. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 19, 100577.
doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100577 |
| 77 |
Ramanujapuram A. ; Yushin G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1802624.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.201802624 |
| 78 |
Wang H. Q. ; Zhang H. Z. ; Cheng Y. ; Feng K. ; Li X. F. ; Zhang H. M. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 278, 279.
doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.047 |
| 79 |
Suo L. M. ; Han F. D. ; Fan X. L. ; Liu H. L. ; Xu K. ; Wang C. S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 6639.
doi: 10.1039/c6ta00451b |
| 80 |
Kim H. I. ; Shin E. ; Kim S. H. ; Lee K. M. ; Park J. ; Kang S. J. ; So S. ; Roh K. C. ; Kwak S. K. ; Lee S. Y. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 36, 222.
doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.12.024 |
| 81 |
Nian Q. S. ; Liu S. ; Liu J. ; Zhang Q. ; Shi J. Q. ; Liu C. ; Wang R. ; Tao Z. L. ; Chen J. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2019, 2, 4370.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00566 |
| 82 |
Zhu K. J. ; Li Z. P. ; Sun Z. Q. ; Liu P. ; Jin T. ; Chen X. C. ; Li H. X. ; Lu W. B. ; Jiao L. F. Small 2022, 18, 2107662.
doi: 10.1002/smll.202107662 |
| 83 |
Jiang L. W. ; Lu Y. X. ; Zhao C. L. ; Liu L. L. ; Zhang J. N. ; Zhang Q. Q. ; Shen X. ; Zhao J. M. ; Yu X. Q. ; Li H. ; et al Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 495.
doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0388-0 |
| 84 |
Sun T. J. ; Yuan X. M. ; Wang K. ; Zheng S. B. ; Shi J. Q. ; Zhang Q. ; Cai W. S. ; Liang J. ; Tao Z. L. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 7042.
doi: 10.1039/d0ta12409e |
| 85 |
Sun T. J. ; Du H. H. ; Zheng S. B. ; Shi J. Q. ; Tao Z. L. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010127.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202010127 |
| 86 |
Tron A. ; Jeong S. ; Park Y. D. ; Mun J. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 14531.
doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02042 |
| 87 |
Jiang Y. Q. ; Ma K. ; Sun M. L. ; Li Y. Y. ; Liu J. P. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022, 0, 1.
doi: 10.1002/eem2.12357 |
| 88 |
Han L. ; Liu K. Z. ; Wang M. H. ; Wang K. F. ; Fang L. M. ; Chen H. T. ; Zhou J. ; Lu X. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704195.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201704195 |
| 89 |
Sun Y. L. ; Wang Y. ; Liu L. Y. ; Liu B. ; Zhang Q. N. ; Wu D. D. ; Zhang H. Z. ; Yan X. B. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 17998.
doi: 10.1039/d0ta04538a |
| 90 |
Pei Z. X. ; Yuan Z. W. ; Wang C. J. ; Zhao S. L. ; Fei J. Y. ; Wei L. ; Chen J. S. ; Wang C. ; Qi R. J. ; Liu Z. W. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 4793.
doi: 10.1002/anie.201915836 |
| 91 |
Sui X. J. ; Guo H. S. ; Chen P. G. ; Zhu Y. N. ; Wen C. Y. ; Gao Y. H. ; Yang J. ; Zhang X. Y. ; Zhang L. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1907986.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201907986 |
| 92 |
Mo F. N. ; Chen Z. ; Liang G. J. ; Wang D. H. ; Zhao Y. W. ; Li H. F. ; Dong B. B. ; Zhi C. Y. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000035.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000035 |
| 93 |
Yang J. B. ; Xu Z. ; Wang J. J. ; Gai L. G. ; Ji X. X. ; Jiang H. H. ; Liu L. B. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009438.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202009438 |
| 94 |
Li X. L. ; Lou D. Y. ; Wang H. Y. ; Sun X. Y. ; Li J. ; Liu Y. N. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2007291.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202007291 |
| 95 |
Lu N. ; Na R. Q. ; Li L. B. ; Zhang C. Y. ; Chen Z. Q. ; Zhang S. L. ; Luan J. S. ; Wang G. B. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2020, 3, 1944.
doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02379 |
| 96 |
Peng H. ; Gao X. J. ; Sun K. J. ; Xie X. ; Ma G. F. ; Zhou X. Z. ; Lei Z. Q. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 422, 130353.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130353 |
| 97 |
Wu S. ; Lou D. Y. ; Wang H. Y. ; Jiang D. Q. ; Fang X. ; Meng J. Q. ; Sun X. Y. ; Li J. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 135057.
doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135057 |
| 98 |
Song L. ; Dai C. L. ; Jin X. T. ; Xiao Y. K. ; Han Y. Y. ; Wang Y. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Li X. Y. ; Zhang S. H. ; Zhang J. T. ; et al Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2203270.
doi: 10.1002/adfm.202203270 |
| 99 |
Peng J. B. ; Zhou M. H. ; Gao Y. F. ; Wang J. F. ; Cao Y. X. ; Wang W. J. ; Wu D. C. ; Yang Y. Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 25073.
doi: 10.1039/d1ta06617j |
| 100 |
Chen M. N. ; Shi X. Y. ; Wang X. L. ; Liu H. Q. ; Wang S. ; Meng C. X. ; Liu Y. ; Zhang L. Z. ; Zhu Y. Y. ; Wu Z. S. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 72, 195.
doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2022.04.0292095-4956 |
| 101 |
Jin X. T. ; Song L. ; Dai C. L. ; Xiao Y. K. ; Han Y. Y. ; Zhang X. Q. ; Li X. Y. ; Bai C. C. ; Zhang J. T. ; Zhao Y. ; et al Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101523.
doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101523 |
| 102 |
Cheng Y. B. ; Chi X. W. ; Yang J. H. ; Liu Y. J. Energy Storage 2021, 40, 102701.
doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.10270 |
| 103 |
Lu C. ; Chen X. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 1907.
doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05148 |
| [1] | Yu Peng, Jiawei Chen, Yue Yin, Yongjie Cao, Mochou Liao, Congxiao Wang, Xiaoli Dong, Yongyao Xia. Tailored cathode electrolyte interphase via ethylene carbonate-free electrolytes enabling stable and wide-temperature operation of high-voltage LiCoO2 [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(8): 100087-. |
| [2] | Jiandong Liu, Zhijia Zhang, Mikhail Kamenskii, Filipp Volkov, Svetlana Svetlana, Jianmin Ma. Research Progress on Cathode Electrolyte Interphase in High-Voltage Lithium Batteries [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2025, 41(2): 100011-. |
| [3] | SUN Xian-Zhong, ZHANG Xiong, ZHANG Da-Cheng, MA Yan-Wei. Activated Carbon-Based Supercapacitors Using Li2SO4 Aqueous Electrolyte [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2012, 28(02): 367-372. |
| [4] | LIU Li, TIAN Fang-Hua, WANG Xian-You, ZHOU Meng. Electrochemical Behavior of LiV3O8 in Aqueous Li2SO4 Solution [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2011, 27(11): 2600-2604. |
| [5] | GUO Ying-Jun; CHEN Hui; QI Lu. Progress in Electrolyte Solutions for Lithium-ion Battery [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2007, 23(Supp): 80-89. |
| [6] | Liu Wen-Bin,Li Yi-Gui,Lu Jiu-Fang;Li Chun-Xi. Eqution of State for Predicting Densities of Aqueous Electrolytes at High Pressure and Temperature by Perturbation Theory [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 1997, 13(08): 736-740. |
| [7] | Yan Wei-Dong,Xu Yi-Jin,Han Shi-Jun. A New Method of Pseudo-Static Ebulliometer for Determination of Osmotic Coefficients of Nonaqueous Electrolyte Solution [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 1995, 11(05): 454-459. |
|
||