扫描电化学显微镜原位表征pH值对核电蒸汽发生器合金腐蚀行为的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201311221

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

用扫描电化学显微镜(SECM)和电化学阻抗谱(EIS)原位表征了溶液pH值对核电蒸汽发生器800 合金溶液中的腐蚀行为的影响. 实验结果表明：在酸性氯化钠溶液中，SECM探针渐进曲线为正反馈，表明800合金为活化阳极溶解，腐蚀电位下的EIS 图呈现完整的单容抗弧特征；而在中性或者碱性溶液中，SECM探针渐进曲线为负反馈，表明800 合金为自钝化，不同阳极电位下的EIS 图均呈现不完整的容抗弧特征，但随着阳极极化电位的增加，EIS 谱容抗弧半径减小，表明钝化膜的耐蚀性下降；SECM二维扫描图像结果显示探针电流增加，表明电极表面活性增加，即钝化膜的溶解速度增加. 而在中性或者碱性溶液中的SECM二维图像中均可观察到若干活性点，这可能与晶界或者金属夹杂物等有关.

关键词: 800合金, pH值, 腐蚀行为, 扫描电化学显微镜, 表面活性, 电化学阻抗谱

Abstract:

The effect of pH on the corrosion resistance of Alloy 800, one of the preferred nuclear steam generator tubing materials, was investigated using in-situ scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The experimental results show that positive feedback is observed in the probe approach curve (PAC) in acidic chloride solutions, indicating that Alloy 800 is active in acidic solutions; the EIS at the corrosion potential in acidic solutions exhibits an intact capacitance arc. However, negative feedbacks are observed in the PAC in either neutral or basic chloride solutions, showing that Alloy 800 is self-passivated in these two solutions. The EIS plots at different anodic potentials show incomplete capacitance arcs, and the arc radius decreases with increasing potential, indicating that the corrosion resistance of the passive film decreases. The SECM images show that the surface reactivity increases (or the dissolution rate of the passive film increases) as the polarization potential increases from the corrosion potential to the positive direction; this is verified by an increased tip current. Some "active spots" can be seen on the SECM images in neutral or basic chloride solutions, which are possibly related to grain boundaries, triple points, and/or inclusions.

Key words: Alloy 800, pH, Corrosion resistance, Scanning electrochemical microscopy, Surface reactivity, Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

罗兵, 夏大海. 扫描电化学显微镜原位表征pH值对核电蒸汽发生器合金腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(1), 59-66. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201311221

LUO Bing, XIA Da-Hai. Characterization of pH Effect on Corrosion Resistance of Nuclear Steam Generator Tubing Alloy by In-situ Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 30(1), 59-66. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201311221

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201311221

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2014/V30/I1/59

参考文献

(1) Pandey, M. D.; Datla, S.; Tapping, R. L.; Lu, Y. C. Nuclear Engineering and Design 2009, 239, 1862. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.05.027
(2) Lu, B. T.; Luo, J. L.; Lu, Y. C. Electrochimica Acta 2013, 87,824. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.006
(3) Lu, B. T.; Luo, J. L.; Lu, Y. C. Electrochimica Acta 2008, 53,4122. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.070
(4) Xia, D. H.; Shi, J. B.; Gong,W. Q.; Zhou, R. J.; Gao, Z. M.;Wang, J. H. Electrochemistry 2012, 80, 907. doi: 10.5796/electrochemistry.80.907
(5) Xia, D. H.; Song, S. Z.;Wang, J. H.; Shi, J. B.; Bi, H. C.; Gao,Z. M. Electrochemistry Communications 2012, 15, 88. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.11.032
(6) Xia, D. H.; Song, S. Z.; Gong,W. Q.; Jiang, Y. X.; Gao, Z. M.;Wang, J. H. Journal of Food Engineeering 2012, 113, 11. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.05.035
(7) Zheng, X.; Xia, D. H.;Wang, H. H.; Fu, C.W. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials 2013, 60, 153. doi: 10.1108/00035591311315382
(8) Zhou, C.;Wang, J. H., Song, S. Z.; Xia, D. H.,Wang, K.; Shen,C.; Luo, B.; Shi, J. B. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Mater. Sci. Ed.) 2013, 28, 367. doi: 10.1007/s11595-013-0697-2
(9) Xia, D. H.; Song, S. Z.; Zhu, R. K.; Behnamian, Y.; Shen, C.;Wang, J. H.; Luo, J. L.; Lu, Y. C.; Klimas, S. Electrochimica Acta 2013, 111, 510. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.030
(10) Xia, D. H.;Wang, J. H.; Jiang, Y. X.; Li, N.; Zhou, C. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology) 2013, 46, 503.[夏大海, 王吉会, 蒋雨轩, 李娜, 周超. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2013, 46, 503.] doi: 10.11784/tdxb20130606
(11) Xia, D. H.; Song, S. Z.;Wang, J. H.; Bi, H. C.; Han, Z.W. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2012, 28, 121. [夏大海, 宋诗哲, 王吉会, 毕慧超, 韩哲文. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28, 121.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201228121
(12) Boissy, C.; Alemany-Dumont, C.; Normand, B.Electrochemistry Communications 2013, 26, 10. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.09.040
(13) Zhao, R.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, J. B.; Tao, L.; Song, S. Z. Journal of Central South University of Technology 2010, 17, 13. doi: 10.1007/s11771-010-0003-9
(14) Zhu, R. K.; Luo, J. L. Electrochemistry Communications 2010,12, 1752. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.10.014
(15) Zhu, R. K.; Lu, B. T.; Luo, J. L.; Lu, Y. C. Applied Surface Science 2013, 270, 755. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.150
(16) Cristina, V.; Cuesta, A. Electrochimica Acta 2011, 56, 6847.doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.05.094
(17) Zuili, D.; Maurice, V.; Marcus, P. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1999, 103, 7896. doi: 10.1021/jp9911088
(18) Hai, N. T. M.; Huemann, S.; Hunger, R.; Jaegermann,W.;Wandelt, K.; Broekmann, P. Journal of Physical Chemistry C2007, 111, 14768. doi: 10.1021/jp072826u
(19) Machet, A.; Galtayries, A.; Zanna, S.; Klein, L.; Maurice, V.;Jolivet, P.; Foucault, M.; Combrade, P.; Scott, P.; Marcus, P.Electrochimica Acta 2004, 49, 3957. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.032
(20) Szocs, E.; Bako, I.; Kosztolanyi, T.; Bertoti, I.; Kalman, E.Electrochimica Acta 2004, 49, 1371.
(21) Zhu, R. K.; Qin, Z. Q.; Noel, J. J.; Shoesmith, D.W.; Ding, Z. F.Analytical Chemistry 2008, 80, 1437. doi: 10.1021/ac701796u
(22) Calhoun, R. L.; Bard, A. J. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2012, 159, F42.
(23) Nickchi, T.; Alfantazi, A. Electrochimica Acta 2011, 58, 743.doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.10.029
(24) Ha, H. Y.; Kwon, H. S. Journal of The Electrochemical Society2012, 159, C416.
(25) Yang, Q.; Luo, J. L. Electrochimica Acta 2000, 45, 3927. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00492-8
(26) Zhang, Y.; Urquidi-MacDonald, M.; Engelhardt, G. R.;MacDonald, D. D. Electrochimica Acta 2012, 69, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.022
(27) Sloppy, J. D.; Lu, Z.; Dickey, E. C.; MacDonald, D. D.Electrochimica Acta 2013, 87, 82. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.014
(28) Zhang, Y.; Urquidi-MacDonald, M.; Engelhardt, G. R.;MacDonald, D. D. Electrochimica Acta 2012, 69, 12. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.023
(29) Maurice, V.; Despert, G.; Zanna, S.; Bacos, M. P.; Marcus, P.Nature Materials 2004, 3, 687. doi: 10.1038/nmat1203
(30) Birbilis, N.; Buchheit, R. G. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2008, 155, C117.
(31) Zaid, B.; Saidi, D.; Benzaid, A.; Hadji, S. Corrosion Science2008, 50, 1841. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.03.006
(32) McCafferty, E. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 1999,146, 2863. doi: 10.1149/1.1392021

[1]	崔同慧, 李航越, 吕泽伟, 王怡戈, 韩敏芳, 孙再洪, 孙凯华. 大尺寸固体氧化物燃料电池的电极过程解析方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(8): 2011009 - .
[2]	杨健, 雷辰, 刘祥, 张建, 孙玉蝶, 张铖, 叶明富, 张奎. 碳量子点阳离子表面活性剂的多功能性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2111030 - .
[3]	杨艳, 何博文, 马华隆, 杨森, 任州宏, 秦天, 卢发贵, 任力闻, 张熠霄, 王天富, 刘晰, 陈立桅. PtRuAgCoNi高熵合金纳米颗粒高效电催化氧化5-羟甲基糠醛[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2201050 - .
[4]	曹冲, 张裴, 曹立冬, 刘铭鑫, 宋玉莹, 陈鹏, 黄啟良, 韩布兴. 液滴在超疏水植物叶面的沉积：实验和分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2207006 - .
[5]	邢肇碧,过治军,张雨微,刘君玲,王玉洁,白光月. SDS对SB3-12胶束表面电荷密度的调控作用及对药物增溶的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1906006 - .
[6]	胡益民, 韩杰, 郭荣. 非离子表面活性剂Brij 30诱导离子液体型表面活性剂C₁₆imC₈Br蠕虫状胶束向凝胶的转变[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1909049 - .
[7]	王英雄, 邓曼丽, 唐永强, 韩玉淳, 黄旭, 侯研博, 王毅琳. 含有酰胺基或酯基的可降解阳离子Gemini表面活性剂在水溶液中的聚集行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(10): 1909046 - .
[8]	龚铃堰, 廖广志, 陈权生, 栾和鑫, 冯玉军. 表面活性剂溶胀胶束：性能及应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 816 -828 .
[9]	罗思琪,王美娜,赵微微,王毅琳. 表面活性剂与叶酸的相互作用及其对光氧化降解的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(7): 766 -774 .
[10]	施王影, 贾川, 张永亮, 吕泽伟, 韩敏芳. 固体氧化物燃料电池电化学阻抗谱差异化研究方法和分解[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(5): 509 -516 .
[11]	刘恒昌,冯玉军. CO₂诱导的五嵌段非离子共聚物与阴离子氟碳表面活性剂的相互作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 408 -414 .
[12]	田晓春,吴雪娥,詹东平,赵峰,姜艳霞,孙世刚. 扫描电化学显微镜用于研究生物膜微环境的电子传递[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(1): 22 -27 .
[13]	张晨辉,赵欣,雷津美,马悦,杜凤沛. 非离子表面活性剂Triton X-100溶液在不同生长期小麦叶片表面的润湿行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(9): 1846 -1854 .
[14]	赵文荣,郝京诚,HeinzHoffmann. 磁性非对称双链长表面活性剂囊泡凝胶[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1655 -1664 .
[15]	田茂章,张帆,马骋,马德胜,蒋凌翔,薛荣荣,刘卡尔顿,黄建滨. 基于广义阴阳表面活性剂体系对不同黏度区间原油的普适性降黏作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1665 -1671 .