Multiply Charged Anions, Maximum Charge Acceptance, and Higher Electron Affinities of Molecules, Superatoms, and Clusters

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801021

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

The addition of electrons to form gas-phase multiply charged anions (MCAs) normally requires sophisticated experiments or calculations.In this work, the factors stabilizing the MCAs, the maximum electron uptake of gas-phase molecules, X, and the electronic stability of MCAs X^Q^-, are discussed. The drawbacks encountered when applying computational and/or conceptual density functional theory (DFT) to MCAs are highlighted. We develop and test a different model based on the valence-state concept. As in DFT, the electronic energy, E(N, v_ex), is a continuous function of the average electron number, N, and the external potential, v_ex, of the nuclei. The valence-state-parabola is a second-order polynomial that allows extending E(N, v_ex) to dianions and higher MCAs. The model expresses the maximum electron acceptance, Q_max, and the higher electron affinities, A_Q, as simple functions of the first electron affinity, A₁, and the ionization energy, I, of the “ancestor” system. Thus, the maximum electron acceptance is Q_{max, calc} = 1 + 12A₁/7(I -A₁). The ground-state parabola model of the conceptual DFT yields approximately half of this value, and it is termed Q_{max, GS} = ${}^{1}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{2}\; $ + A₁/(I -A₁). A large variety of molecules are evaluated including fullerenes, metal clusters, super-pnictogens, super-halogens (OF₃), super-alkali species (OLi₃), and neutral or charged transition-metal complexes, AB_mL_n^0/+/-. The calculated second electron affinity A_{2, calc} = A₁-(7/12)(I -A₁) is linearly correlated to the literature references A_{2, lit} with a correlation coefficient R = 0.998. A₂ or A₃ values are predicted for further 24 species. The appearance sizes, n_ap^3-, of triply charged anionic clusters and fullerenes are calculated in agreement with the literature.

关键词: Multiply charged negative ions, Their appearance sizes, Second electron affinity, Third electron affinity, Conceptual density-functional theory, Valence-state parabola model of electronegativity

Abstract:

The addition of electrons to form gas-phase multiply charged anions (MCAs) normally requires sophisticated experiments or calculations.In this work, the factors stabilizing the MCAs, the maximum electron uptake of gas-phase molecules, X, and the electronic stability of MCAs X^Q^-, are discussed. The drawbacks encountered when applying computational and/or conceptual density functional theory (DFT) to MCAs are highlighted. We develop and test a different model based on the valence-state concept. As in DFT, the electronic energy, E(N, v_ex), is a continuous function of the average electron number, N, and the external potential, v_ex, of the nuclei. The valence-state-parabola is a second-order polynomial that allows extending E(N, v_ex) to dianions and higher MCAs. The model expresses the maximum electron acceptance, Q_max, and the higher electron affinities, A_Q, as simple functions of the first electron affinity, A₁, and the ionization energy, I, of the "ancestor" system. Thus, the maximum electron acceptance is Q_{max, calc} = 1 + 12A₁/7(I -A₁). The ground-state parabola model of the conceptual DFT yields approximately half of this value, and it is termed Q_{max, GS} = ${}^{1}\!\!\diagup\!\!{}_{2}\; $ + A₁/(I -A₁). A large variety of molecules are evaluated including fullerenes, metal clusters, super-pnictogens, super-halogens (OF₃), super-alkali species (OLi₃), and neutral or charged transition-metal complexes, AB_mL_n^0/+/-. The calculated second electron affinity A_{2, calc} = A₁-(7/12)(I -A₁) is linearly correlated to the literature references A_{2, lit} with a correlation coefficient R = 0.998. A₂ or A₃ values are predicted for further 24 species. The appearance sizes, n_ap^3-, of triply charged anionic clusters and fullerenes are calculated in agreement with the literature.

Key words: Multiply charged negative ions, Their appearance sizes, Second electron affinity, Third electron affinity, Conceptual density-functional theory, Valence-state parabola model of electronegativity

VON SZENTPÁLY László. Multiply Charged Anions, Maximum Charge Acceptance, and Higher Electron Affinities of Molecules, Superatoms, and Clusters[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(6), 675-682. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801021

László VON SZENTPÁLY. Multiply Charged Anions, Maximum Charge Acceptance, and Higher Electron Affinities of Molecules, Superatoms, and Clusters[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, 34(6), 675-682. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801021

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201801021

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V34/I6/675

参考文献

1	Pearson R. G. Chemical Hardness; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany 1997.
2	Sommerfeld T. ; Weber R. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 6675.
3	Walters T. ; Wang X. B. ; Wang L.-S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 474.
4	Herlert A. ; Kruckeberg S. ; Schweikhard L. ; Vogel M. ; Walther C. Phys. Scr 1999, T80, 200.
5	Franzreb K. ; Wiliams P. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 224312.
6	Walsh N. ; Martinez F. ; Marx G. ; Schweikhard L. ; Ziegler F. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 014308.
7	Wong A. Y. ; Mamas D. L. ; Arnush D. Phys. Fluids 1975, 18, 1489.
8	Wang X. B. ; Wang L. S. Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Multiply Charged Anions. In Annual Review Physical Chemistry; Annual Reviews Inc.: Palo Alto, CA, USA 2009, Vol. 60, pp. 105- 126.
9	Langer P. ; Freiberg W. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4125.
10	Tallgren L. Acta Med. Scand. Suppl. 1980, 640, 1.
11	Lee A. ; Dawson P. A. ; Markovich D. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 1350.
12	Ramanathan V. ; Crutzen P. J. ; Kiehl J. T. ; Rosenfeld D. Science 2001, 294, 2119.
13	Scheller M. K. ; Compton R. N. ; Cederbaum L. S. Science 1995, 270, 1160.
14	Boldyrev A. I. ; Gutowski M. ; Simons J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 497.
15	Dreuw A. ; Cederbaum L. S. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 181.
16	Feuerbacher S. ; Cederbaum L. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 11401.
17	von Szentpály L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 10891.
18	Parr R. G. ; Yang W. Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK 1989.
19	Parr R. G. ; Pearson R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7512.
20	Cohen A. J. ; Mori-Sánchez P. ; Yang W. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 289.
21	Parr R. G. ; von Szentpály L. ; Liu S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922.
22	Bergmann D. ; Hinze J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 150.
23	von Szentpály L. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 1991, 233, 71.
24	von Szentpály L. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2000, 76, 222.
25	Glasser L. ; von Szentpály L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12314.
26	Datta D. ; Shee N. K. ; von Szentpály L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 200.
27	von Szentpály L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 1715.
28	Sen K. D. ; Boehm M. C. ; Schmidt P. C. Structure and Bonding; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany 1987, Vol. 66, p. 99.
29	Janak J. F. Phys. Rev. B 1978, 18, 7165.
30	Jensen F. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2010, 6, 2736.
31	Kim M.-C. ; Sim E. ; Burke K. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 171103.
32	Wade K. Chem. Commun. 1971, 792
33	Mingos D. M. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1984, 17, 311.
34	Zhao T. ; Zhou J. ; Wang Q. ; Jena P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 13421.
35	Herlert A. ; Schweighardt L. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 229, 19.
36	Yannouleas C. ; Landman U. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 210, 437.
37	de Heer W. A. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1993, 65, 611.
38	Gutsev G. L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1991, 184, 305.
39	Pernpointner M. ; Cederbaum L. S. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 144310.
40	Wesendrup R. ; Schwerdtfeger P. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 3351.
41	Craciun R. ; Picone D. ; Long R. T. ; Li S. ; Dixon D. A. ; Peterson K. A. ; Christe K. O. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 1056.
42	Craciun R. ; Long R. T. ; Dixon D. A. ; Christe K. O. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 7571.
43	Macgregor S.A. ; Moock K. H. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 3284.
44	Seppelt K. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1296.
45	Pradhan K. ; Gutsev G. L. ; Weatherford C. A. ; Jena P. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 144305.
46	Uzunova E. L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 10665.
47	Zhou M. ; Andrews L. ; Ismail N. ; Marsden C. J. Phys. Chem. 2000, 104, 5495.
48	Zein S. ; Ortiz J. V. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 135, 164307.
49	Zein S. ; Ortiz J. V. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 224305.
50	Anusiewicz I. ; Freza S. ; Sikorska C. ; Skurski P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2010, 493, 234.
51	Boltanina O. V. ; Ioffé I. N. ; Sidorov L. N. ; Seifert G. ; Vietze K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9745.
52	Hampe O. ; Neumaier M. ; Blom M. N. ; Kappes M. M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 354, 303.
53	Wang X..-B. ; Woo H. -K. ; Yang J. ; Kappes M. M. ; Wang L. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 17684.
54	Wang X.-B. ; Woo H. -K. ; Huang X. ; Kappes M. M. ; Wang L. -S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 143002.
55	Nasibullaev S. K. ; Davletbaeva G. D. ; Vasil'ev Z. V. ; Nasibullayev I. S. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2004, 12, 491.
56	Wang X.-B. ; Chi C. ; Zhou M. ; Kuvychko I. V. ; Seppelt K. ; Popov A. A. ; Strauss S. H. ; Boltalina O. ; Wang L. -S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 1756.
57	Caddeo C. ; Malloci G. ; De Angelis F. ; Colombo L. ; Mattoni A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14293.
58	Belau L. ; Wheeler S. W. ; Ticknor B. W. ; Ahmed M. ; Leone S. R. ; Allen W. D. ; Schaefer H. F. ; Duncan M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10229.
59	Ortíz J. V. ; Zakrzewski V. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 6614.
60	Ortíz J. V. ; Zakrzewski V. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 294.
61	Sommerfeld T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 8806.
62	Wang J. ; Yang M. ; Jellinek J. ; Wang G. Phys. Rev. 2006, A74, 023202.
63	Kostko O. Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Mass-selected Sodium, Coinage Metal and Divalent Metal Cluster Anions; PThesis h. D., Universit?t Freiburg: Freiburg, Germany 2007, www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de.
64	Yannouleas C. ; Landman U. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, R10587.
65	Berkowitz J. ; Lifshitz G. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 48, 4346.
66	Jin Y. ; Maroulis G. ; Kuang X. ; Ding L. ; Lu C. ; Wang J. ; Lv J. ; Zhang C. ; Ju M. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 13590.
67	Zakrzewski V. C. ; von Niessen W. Theor. Chim. Acta 1994, 88, 75.
68	BerghofV. ; Sommerfeld T. ; Cederbaum L. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5100.
69	Kaplan I. G. ; Dolgounitcheva O. ; Watts J. D. ; Ortiz J. V. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 3687.
70	Roy D. R. ; Chattaraj P. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 1612.
71	von Szentpály L. J. Mol. Model 2017, 23, 217.
72	Sabzyan H. ; Noorisafa Z. ; Keshavarz E. Spectrochim. Acta A 2014, 117, 95.
73	Zakrzewski V. G. ; Dolgounitcheva O. ; Ortiz J. V. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 5872.
74	Zhu G.-Z. ; Wang L. -S. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 221102.
75	Nielsen S. B. ; Nielsen M. B. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 10069.
76	Assadollahzadeh B. ; Thierfelder C. ; Schwerdtfeger P. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 245423.
77	Haynes W. M. ; Lide R. D. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 92nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA 2011, 2012.
78	Lias S. G. ; Bartmess J. E. ; Liebman J. F. ; Holmes J. L. ; Levin R. D. ; Mallard W. G. Ion Energetics Data in NIST Chemistry Webbook; NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA 2015.
79	Richard R. M. ; Marshall M. S. ; Dolgounitcheva O. ; Ortiz J. V. ; Bre?das J.-L. ; Marom N. ; Sherrill C. D. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12, 595.
80	Wang X. B. ; Wang L.-S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 4429.
81	Gutsev G. L. ; Boldyrev A. I. Mol. Phys. 1984, 53, 23.
82	von Szentpály L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 8528.
83	Walsh N. Multiply-Negatively Charged Aluminum Clusters and Fullerenes; PThesis h. D., Universit?t Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany 2008, ub-ed.ub.unigreifswald.de/opus/volltexte/2008/.../ Diss_Walsh.pdf.
84	Taylor K. J. ; Pettiette-Hall C. L. ; Chesnovsky O. ; Smalley R. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 3319.