水溶液法原位构建ZnO亲锂层稳定锂-石榴石电解质界面

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009006

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (1): 2009006.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009006

所属专题：金属锂负极

水溶液法原位构建ZnO亲锂层稳定锂-石榴石电解质界面

蔡明俐¹^,², 姚柳¹^,², 靳俊¹^,², 温兆银¹^,²^,*()

¹ 中国科学院上海硅酸盐研究所，能量转换材料重点实验室，上海 200050
² 中国科学院大学材料与光电研究中心，北京 100049

收稿日期:2020-09-01 录用日期:2020-09-24 发布日期:2020-10-09
通讯作者: 温兆银 E-mail:zywen@mail.sic.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发项目(2018YFB0905400);国家自然科学基金项目(51772315);上海市科学技术委员会项目(18DZ2280800)

In situ Lithiophilic ZnO Layer Constructed using Aqueous Strategy for a Stable Li-Garnet Interface

Mingli Cai¹^,², Liu Yao¹^,², Jun Jin¹^,², Zhaoyin Wen¹^,²^,*()

¹ CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China
² Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2020-09-01 Accepted:2020-09-24 Published:2020-10-09
Contact: Zhaoyin Wen E-mail:zywen@mail.sic.ac.cn
About author:Zhaoyin Wen. Email: zywen@mail.sic.ac.cn; Tel.: +86-21-52411704
Supported by:
the National Key R & D Program of China(2018YFB0905400);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51772315);the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality(18DZ2280800)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

固态电池以其高安全性和高能量密度而备受关注。石榴石型固体电解质(LLZO)由于具有较高的离子导电性和对锂金属的稳定性，在固态电池中具有应用前景，但陶瓷与锂金属较差的界面接触会导致高的界面阻抗和可能形成的枝晶穿透。我们利用LLZO表层独特的H⁺/Li⁺交换反应，提出了一种简便有效的金属盐类水溶液诱发策略，在电解质表面原位构建ZnO亲锂层，界面处LiZn合金化实现紧密连续的接触。引入改性层后，界面阻抗可显著降低至约10 Ω·cm²，对称电池能够在0.1 mA·cm^-2的电流密度下实现长达1000 h的长循环稳定性。匹配正极LiFePO₄(LFP)或LiNi_0.5Co_0.2Mn_0.3O₂ (NCM523)的准固态电池在室温下能够稳定循环100次以上。

关键词: 石榴石电解质, Zn(NO₃)₂水溶液, 原位修饰, 界面稳定性, 固态锂电池

Abstract:

Solid-state batteries have garnered significant attention, owing to their high safety and improved energy density. Among various solid-state electrolytes (SSEs), garnet-type SSEs are promising for application in solid-state batteries, owing to their high ionic conductivities (10^-4–10^-3 S·cm^-1) at room temperature and excellent stability against Li metal. However, the poor contact between the rigid ceramic and Li metal will result in high interfacial impedance and uneven lithium ion flux during cycling. Consequently, this will lead to rapid dendrite penetration along the grain boundary and eventual short circuit. Herein, inspired by the unique H⁺/Li⁺ exchange reaction of the garnet electrolyte, we propose a facile and efficient metal salt aqueous-solution-based strategy to construct an in situ lithiophilic ZnO layer on the garnet surface without employing any specific apparatus. A Zn(NO₃)₂ aqueous solution was selected to modify the garnet surface. Within one minute, LiOH spontaneously formed as a result of the H⁺/Li⁺ exchange reaction reacted with Zn(NO₃)₂ to produce homogeneous precipitates. After heat treatment, a lithiophilic ZnO layer was obtained. This was verified by the results of X-ray diffraction and attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses. Furthermore, combined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and corresponding elemental mapping, it was proved that a thin in situ interlayer can be successfully deposited on the garnet surface using our strategy. Moreover, the deposited ZnO nanoparticles were uniformly and densely distributed on the garnet surface. In the presence of the introduced layer, the wettability of the garnet-type SSE with molten Li was greatly improved. The introduced ZnO nanoparticles reacted with molten Li to form a LiZn alloy, achieving a tight and continuous contact at the Li–garnet interface, thereby greatly reducing the interfacial impedance to ~10 Ω·cm². In the case of the untreated SSE in contact with the molten Li, the cross-sectional SEM image shows obvious gaps at the interface, indicating poor contact with Li. This resulted in a large interfacial resistance of up to 1350 Ω·cm². Moreover, the slow ion transport at the interface reduces the capacity of the battery, and the uneven Li ion flux shortens the life of the cell. With a modified layer, the formed LiZn alloy interphase acting as a mixed ionic and electronic conductive interlayer ensures a uniform Li ion flux at the interface and an appreciable electrochemical performance. Symmetric Li cells with modified garnet-type electrolytes can achieve long cycling stability for approximately 1000 h at a current density of 0.1 mA·cm^-2 at room temperature (RT). The quasi solid-state batteries with LiNi_0.5Co_0.2Mn_0.3O₂ (NCM523) or LiFePO₄ cathodes can cycle stably for over 100 cycles at RT.

Key words: Garnet electrolyte, Zn(NO₃)₂ aqueous solution, In situ modification, Interfacial stability, Solid-state Li battery

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

蔡明俐, 姚柳, 靳俊, 温兆银. 水溶液法原位构建ZnO亲锂层稳定锂-石榴石电解质界面[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1), 2009006. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009006

Mingli Cai, Liu Yao, Jun Jin, Zhaoyin Wen. In situ Lithiophilic ZnO Layer Constructed using Aqueous Strategy for a Stable Li-Garnet Interface[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(1), 2009006. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009006

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009006

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I1/2009006

图/表 5

参考文献 32

1	Xu W. ; Wang J. ; Ding F. ; Chen X. ; Nasybutin E. ; Zhang Y. ; Zhang J. G. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 513. doi: 10.1039/c3ee40795k
2	Xin S. ; You Y. ; Wang S. ; Gao H. C. ; Yin Y. X. ; Guo Y. G. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1385. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00175
3	Wang H. ; An H. W. ; Shan H. M. ; Zhao L. ; Wang J. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2007070.
	王晗; 安汉文; 单红梅; 赵雷; 王家钧. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2007070. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007070
4	Sun C. ; Ruan Y. ; Zha W. ; Li W. ; Cai M. ; Wen Z. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 1667. doi: 10.1039/d0mh00050g
5	Murugan R. ; Thangadurai V. ; Weppner W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7778. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701144
6	Chen R. ; Nolan A. M. ; Lu J. ; Wang J. ; Yu X. ; Mo Y. ; Chen L. ; Huang X. ; Li H. Joule 2020, 4, 812. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.012
7	Liu Q. ; Geng Z. ; Han C. ; Fu Y. ; Li S. ; He Y. B. ; Kang F. ; Li B. J. Power Sources 2018, 389, 120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.019
8	Thangadurai V. ; Narayanan S. ; Pinzaru D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 4714. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00020j
9	Li Y. ; Han J. T. ; Wang C. A. ; Xie H. ; Goodenough J. B. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 15357. doi: 10.1039/c2jm31413d
10	Liu C. ; Rui K. ; Shen C. ; Badding M. E. ; Zhang G. ; Wen Z. J. Power Sources 2015, 282, 286. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.050
11	Xia W. ; Xu B. ; Duan H. ; Tang X. ; Guo Y. ; Kang H. ; Li H. ; Liu H. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 2832. doi: 10.1111/jace.14865
12	Cai M. ; Lu Y. ; Su J. ; Ruan Y. ; Chen C. ; Chowdari B. V. R. ; Wen Z. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 35030. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b13190
13	Brugge R. H. ; Hekselman A. K. O. ; Cavallaro A. ; Pesci F. M. ; Chater R. J. ; Kilner J. A. ; Aguadero A. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 3704. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00486
14	Wu J. ; Pu B. W. ; Wang D. ; Shi S. ; Zhao N. ; Guo X. ; Guo X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 11, 898. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b18356
15	Sharafi A. ; Kazyak E. ; Davis A. L. ; Yu S. ; Thompson T. ; Siegel D. J. ; Dasgupta N. P. ; Sakamoto J. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7961. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03002
16	Huo H. ; Chen Y. ; Zhao N. ; Lin X. ; Luo J. ; Yang X. ; Liu Y. ; Guo X. ; Sun X. Nano Energy 2019, 61, 119. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.058
17	Ruan Y. ; Lu Y. ; Huang X. ; Su J. ; Sun C. ; Jin J. ; Wen Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 14565. doi: 10.1039/c9ta01911a
18	Li Y. ; Chen X. ; Dolocan A. ; Cui Z. ; Xin S. ; Xue L. ; Xu H. ; Park K. ; Goodenough J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6448. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b03106
19	Han X. ; Gong Y. ; Fu K. K. ; He X. ; Hitz G. ; Dai J. ; Pearse A. ; Liu B. ; Wang H. ; Rubloff G. ; et al Nat. Mater. 2016, 16, 572. doi: 10.1038/nmat4821
20	Luo W. ; Gong Y. ; Zhu Y. ; Fu K. K. ; Dai J. ; Lacey S. D. ; Wang C. ; Liu B. ; Han X. ; Mo Y. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12258. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06777
21	Fu K. K. ; Gong Y. ; Fu Z. ; Xie H. ; Yao Y. ; Liu B. ; Carter M. ; Wachsman E. ; Hu L. Angew.Chem. Int.Ed. 2017, 56, 14942. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708637
22	Huang X. ; Shen C. ; Rui K. ; Jin J. ; Wu M. ; Wu X. ; Wen Z. Jom 2016, 68, 2593. doi: 10.1007/s11837-016-2065-0
23	Lu Y. ; Huang X. ; Ruan Y. ; Wang Q. ; Kun R. ; Yang J. ; Wen Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 18853. doi: 10.1039/c8ta07241h
24	Tavares S. R. ; Vaiss V. S. ; Wypych F. ; Leitao A. A. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 114, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.011
25	Nityashree N. ; Rajamathi M. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2013, 74, 1164. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2013.03.015
26	Zieba A. ; Pacuła A. ; Serwicka E. M. ; Drelinkiewicz A. Fuel 2010, 89, 1961. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.11.013
27	Choi Y. K. ; Chung K. ; Kim W. S. ; Sung Y. E. ; Park S. M. J. Power Sources 2002, 104, 132. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00911-9
28	Ghotbi M. Y. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 491, 420. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.214
29	Wang J. ; Wang H. ; Xie J. ; Yang A. ; Pei A. ; Wu C. ; Shi F. ; Liu Y. ; Lin D. ; Gong Y. ; et al Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 14, 345. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.05.021
30	Wang C. ; Gong Y. ; Liu B. ; Fu K. ; Yao Y. ; Hitz E. ; Li Y. ; Dai J. ; Xu S. ; Luo W.. ; et al Nano Lett. 2016, 17, 565. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04695
31	Huo H. ; Chen Y. ; Li R. ; Zhao N. ; Luo J. ; Pereira da Silva J. G. ; Mucke R. ; Kaghazchi P. ; Guo X. ; Sun X. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 127. doi: 10.1039/c9ee01903k
32	Chen Y. ; He M. ; Zhao N. ; Fu J. ; Huo H. ; Zhang T. ; Li Y. ; Xu F. ; Guo X. J. Power Sources 2019, 420, 15. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.02.085

[1]	赵永智, 陈晨阳, 刘文燚, 胡伟飞, 刘金平. 固态锂电池界面优化策略的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2211017 -0 .
[2]	夏求应, 蔡雨, 刘威, 王金石, 吴川智, 昝峰, 徐璟, 夏晖. 锂负极失效的全固态薄膜锂电池的直接回收再利用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2212051 -0 .
[3]	金锋,李静,胡晨吉,董厚才,陈鹏,沈炎宾,陈立桅. 基于一体化正极与电解质膜的高性能固态电池[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(12): 1399 -1403 .
[4]	梁桂杰, 钟志成, 许杰, 徐卫林, 陈美华, 张增常, 李文联. 原位交联杂化型聚合物电解质膜的形成机理、结构模型及其电化学性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(09): 2057 -2064 .

水溶液法原位构建ZnO亲锂层稳定锂-石榴石电解质界面

In situ Lithiophilic ZnO Layer Constructed using Aqueous Strategy for a Stable Li-Garnet Interface

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

支持信息

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 32

相关文章 4

Metrics

推荐阅读 0