基于电化学噪声研究缓蚀剂对AA6063铝合金点蚀的影响

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201206251

物理化学学报 >> 2012, Vol. 28 >> Issue (09): 2097-2107.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201206251

基于电化学噪声研究缓蚀剂对AA6063铝合金点蚀的影响

阮红梅¹, 董泽华¹, 石维¹, 陈东初²

1. 华中科技大学化学与化工学院, 武汉 430074;
2. 佛山科学技术学院化学与化工系, 广东佛山 528000

收稿日期:2012-05-07 修回日期:2012-06-25 发布日期:2012-08-02
通讯作者: 董泽华 E-mail:zehua.dong@gmail.com
基金资助:
教育部科学技术研究重点项目(211129)资助

Effect of Inhibitors on Pitting Corrosion of AA6063 Aluminium Alloy Based on Electrochemical Noise

RUAN Hong-Mei¹, DONG Ze-Hua¹, SHI Wei¹, CHEN Dong-Chu²

1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China;
2. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, Guangdong Province, P. R. China

Received:2012-05-07 Revised:2012-06-25 Published:2012-08-02
Contact: DONG Ze-Hua E-mail:zehua.dong@gmail.com
Supported by:
The project was supported by the Foundation for Key Program of Ministry of Education of China (211129).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用电化学噪声(ECN)、电化学阻抗谱(EIS)和极化曲线研究了AA6063 铝合金在3% (w) NaCl 溶液中的亚稳态点蚀萌发和稳态点蚀生长特征, 着重探讨了CeCl₃、Na₂CrO₄、8-羟基喹啉(8-HQ)等三种不同类型缓蚀剂对亚稳态和稳态点蚀的抑制机理. 结果表明: 当铝合金表面阴极相(Al-Si-Fe)周边的Al 基体发生局部溶解后,会导致邻近区域pH值升高(>8.4), 引起Ce(OH)₃在蚀点中心区的阴极相表面优先沉积, 从而抑制局部腐蚀的阴极去极化过程. 随着缓蚀剂浓度的提高, 亚稳态噪声峰的平均积分电量(q)随之递减, 但噪声峰的平均寿命几乎没有变化, 表明Ce³⁺并不能直接加速亚稳态蚀点的修复, 但可降低蚀点内金属Al 的溶解速率. CrO₄^2-不但可加速蚀点修复, 还可降低亚稳态蚀点的形核速率. 8-HQ主要与Al³⁺、Mg²⁺等形成不溶性螯合物并沉积在铝合金表面,提高了铝基体的全面抗腐蚀能力, 但并不能显著提高其耐点蚀能力.

关键词: 铝合金, 电化学噪声, 点蚀, 缓蚀剂, 形核速率

Abstract:

The pitting corrosion of AA6063 aluminum alloy in 3% (w) NaCl solution was investigated by electrochemical noise (ECN), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and polarization curves. Inhibition of nucleation and propagation of metastable pits by inhibitors, such as CeCl₃, Na₂CrO₄, and 8-hydroxyquinoline (8-HQ), was evaluated based on ECN data statistics. It was found that the local pH could be over 8.4 near the cathode phase (Al-Si-Fe) due to dissolution of Al matrix, leading to preferential deposition of Ce(OH)₃ on the surface of the cathode phase, thereby inhibiting the cathodic process of pitting corrosion. The average electric charge (q) of metastable pits decreased with increasing the corrosion inhibitor concentration, but the average lifespan of noise transients remained almost constant, indicating that Ce³⁺ ions did not accelerate the rehabilitation of metastable pits directly, but reduced the dissolution rate of Al inside active pits. However, CrO₄^2- ions not only accelerated the rehabilitation of metastable pits, but also reduced the nucleation rate of the AA6063 aluminum alloy. In contrast, 8-HQ acted as an effective corrosion inhibitor for AA6063 aluminum alloy through formation of insoluble chelate films with Al³⁺ ions and Mg²⁺ ions, but failed to enhance the pitting corrosion resistance of the aluminum alloy.

Key words: Aluminium alloy, Electrochemical noise, Pitting corrosion, Inhibitor, Nucleation rate

阮红梅, 董泽华, 石维, 陈东初. 基于电化学噪声研究缓蚀剂对AA6063铝合金点蚀的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(09): 2097-2107.

RUAN Hong-Mei, DONG Ze-Hua, SHI Wei, CHEN Dong-Chu. Effect of Inhibitors on Pitting Corrosion of AA6063 Aluminium Alloy Based on Electrochemical Noise[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2012, 28(09): 2097-2107.

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201206251

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2012/V28/I09/2097

参考文献

(1) Na, K. H.; Pyun, S. I. Corrosion Science 2008, 50, 248. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.05.028
(2) Cai, C.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, F.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Cao, C. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2005, 578, 143. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.12.032
(3) Aballe, A.; Bethencourt, M.; Botana, F. J.; Marcos, M.; Osuna,R. M. Electrochimica Acta 2002, 47, 1415. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00871-4
(4) Speckert, L.; Burstein, G. T. Corrosion Science 2011, 53, 534.doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.11.008
(5) Mansfeld, F.; Sun, Z.; Hsu, C.; Nagiub, A. Corrosion Science2001, 43, 341. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(00)00064-0
(6) Markley, T. A.; Forsyth, M.; Hughes, A. E. Electrochimica Acta2007, 52, 4024. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.11.028
(7) Davo, B.; de Damborenea, J. J. Electrochimica Acta 2004, 49,4957. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.06.008
(8) Yu, P.; O'Keefe, T. J. Journal of the Electrochemical Society2006, 153, C80.
(9) Yu, P.; Hayes, S. A.; O'Keefe, T. J.; O'Keefe, M. J.; Stoffer, J. O.Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2006, 153, C74.
(10) Birbilis, N.; Buchheit, R. G.; Ho, D. L.; Forsyth, M.Electrochemical and Solid State Letters 2005, 8, C180.
(11) Grilli, R.; Baker, M. A.; Castle, J. E.; Dunn, B.;Watts, J. F.Corrosion Science 2011, 53, 1214. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.12.006
(12) Ilevbare, G.; Scully, J. Journal of the Electrochemical Society2001, 148, B196.
(13) Soliman, H. Corrosion Science 2011, 53, 2994. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.05.045
(14) Li, S. M.; Zhang, H. R.; Liu, J. H. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 2007, 17, 318. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(07)60092-2
(15) Dong, Z. H.; Guo, X. P.; Zheng, J. R.; Xu, L. M. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection 2002, 22, 290.[董泽华, 郭兴蓬, 郑家燊, 许立铭. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2002, 22, 290.]
(16) Dong, Z. H.; Shi,W.; Guo, X. P. Corrosion Science 2011, 53,1322. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.12.028
(17) Zhang, J. Q.; Zhang, Z.;Wang, J. M.; Cao, C. N. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection 2001, 21, 310.[张鉴清, 张昭, 王建明, 曹楚南. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2001, 21, 310.]
(18) Zheludkevich, M.; Yasakau, K.; Poznyak, S.; Ferreira, M.Corrosion Science 2005, 47, 3368. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.040
(19) Zhang,W. L.; Frankel, G. S. Electrochimica Acta 2003, 48,1193. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00828-9
(20) Yasakau, K. A.; Zheludkevich, M. L.; Lamaka, S. V.; Ferreira,M. G. S. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2006, 110, 5515. doi: 10.1021/jp0560664
(21) Leblanc, P.; Frankel, G. Journal of the Electrochemical Society2002, 149, B239.
(22) Rosero-Navarro, N. C.; Curioni, M.; Bingham, R.; Duran, A.;Aparicio, M.; Cottis, R. A.; Thompson, G. E. Corrosion Science2010, 52, 3356. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.06.012
(23) MacDonald, D. D.; Al Rifaie, M.; Engelhardt, G. R. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2001, 148, B343.
(24) MacDonald, D. D. Electrochimica Acta 2011, 56, 1761. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.11.005
(25) Dong, Z.; Guo, X.; Zheng, J.; Xu, L. Electrochemistry Communications 2001, 3, 561. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2481(01)00220-X
(26) Dong, Z. H.; Zhu, T.; Shi,W.; Guo, X. P. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin.2011, 27, 905. [董泽华, 朱涛, 石维, 郭兴蓬. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27, 905. ] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110336
(27) Clark,W. J.; Ramsey, J. D.; McCreery, R. L.; Frankel, G. S.Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2002, 149, B179.

[1]	郭亚, 金飘, 邵敏华, 董士刚, 杜荣归, 林昌健. 基于癸二酸二异辛酯的环保型复合缓蚀剂对钢筋的缓蚀效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(4): 2003033 - .
[2]	王太杨,邹长军,李代禧,陈正隆,刘圆,李小可,李明. 环糊精包合有机磷酸作为缓蚀剂的理论研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(12): 2294 -2302 .
[3]	王健, 王绍青. 铝合金表面电偶腐蚀与电子功函数的关系[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(3): 551 -558 .
[4]	李向红, 谢小光. 嘧啶衍生物对钢在盐酸溶液中的缓蚀作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(10): 2221 -2231 .
[5]	孙磉礅, 米思奇, 游靖, 余吉良, 胡松青, 刘新泳. 苯并咪唑类缓蚀剂的HQSAR研究及分子设计[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(06): 1192 -1200 .
[6]	杨榕杰, 郭亚, 唐方苗, 王小平, 杜荣归, 林昌健. 模拟混凝土孔隙液中D-葡萄糖酸钠复合缓蚀剂对钢筋的阻锈作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(08): 1923 -1928 .
[7]	赵景茂, 李俊. 新型双子表面活性剂在H₂S和CO₂盐水溶液中对碳钢的缓蚀性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(03): 623 -629 .
[8]	高丽霞, 王丽娜, 齐涛, 余江. 从2AlCl₃/Et₃NHCl离子液体中电沉积制备Ni 和Ni-Al 合金[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(01): 111 -120 .
[9]	李向红, 邓书端, 付惠. 氯化硝基四氮唑蓝对钢在盐酸溶液中的缓蚀作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(12): 2841 -2848 .
[10]	赵勇, 薛文斌, 刘宏芳. 稀土铈对铝合金LY12CZ微生物腐蚀行为的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(11): 2618 -2624 .
[11]	董泽华, 朱涛, 石维, 郭兴蓬. 烯胺阻锈剂对钢筋在模拟碳化混凝土孔隙液中的点蚀抑制[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(04): 905 -912 .
[12]	张启波, 华一新. 咪唑离子液体对铜在硫酸溶液中的缓蚀作用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(03): 655 -663 .
[13]	董泽华, 石维, 郭兴蓬. 用丝束电极研究模拟碳化混凝土孔隙液中缓蚀剂对碳钢局部腐蚀的抑制行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2011, 27(01): 127 -134 .
[14]	乔贵民, 任振甲, 张军, 胡松青, 燕友果, 提阳. 腐蚀介质在缓蚀剂膜中扩散行为的分子动力学模拟[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(11): 3041 -3046 .
[15]	胡松青, 胡建春, 范成成, 米思奇, 张军, 郭文跃. 新型咪唑啉化合物在H₂S/CO₂共存条件下对Q235钢的缓蚀性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(08): 2163 -2170 .

基于电化学噪声研究缓蚀剂对AA6063铝合金点蚀的影响

Effect of Inhibitors on Pitting Corrosion of AA6063 Aluminium Alloy Based on Electrochemical Noise

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0