Fe3O4改性的Ru/γ-Al2O3催化剂的原位液相加氢性能

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302052

物理化学学报 >> 2013, Vol. 29 >> Issue (04): 799-805.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302052

Fe₃O₄改性的Ru/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂的原位液相加氢性能

陈傲昂, 许响生, 华焱祥, 顾辉子, 严新焕

浙江工业大学绿色化学合成技术国家重点实验室培育基地, 杭州 310014

收稿日期:2012-12-18 修回日期:2013-01-30 发布日期:2013-03-25
通讯作者: 严新焕 E-mail:xinhuanyan139@hotmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(20676124, 21076197); 浙江省自然科学基金(Y4090440)及浙江省钱江人才项目(2010R10038)资助

Fe3O4 Modified Alumina Supported Ruthenium Catalyst for Novel In-situ Liquid Phase Catalytic Hydrogenation

CHEN Ao-Ang, XU Xiang-Sheng, HUA Yan-Xiang, GU Hui-Zi, YAN Xin-Huan

State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Chemistry-Synthesis Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, P. R. China

Received:2012-12-18 Revised:2013-01-30 Published:2013-03-25
Supported by:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20676124, 21076197), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Y4090440), and Qianjiang Talent Program of Zhejiang Province, China (2010R10038).

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

采用分步浸渍法制备负载型Ru-Fe₃O₄/γ-Al₂O₃ 催化剂, 并利用透射电子显微镜(TEM)、X 射线衍射(XRD)、N₂吸附-脱附(BET)、傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱与X射线光电子能谱(XPS)表征催化剂的纳米颗粒粒径分布、晶相组成、表面结构及吸附物种等性质. 将Ru-Fe₃O₄/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂用于3,4-二氯硝基苯选择性原位液相加氢反应, 考察了反应条件对催化活性的影响, 并讨论了不同制备条件下催化剂的稳定性能. 结果表明, 在473 K、液压3 MPa、原料质量分数2%, 乙醇/水体积比75:25 的反应条件下, 3,4-二氯硝基苯的转化率为100%, 3,4-二氯苯胺的选择性高达96.4%. Fe₃O₄含量对催化剂稳定性能有显著影响, 当Ru和Fe 的质量分数分别为2%和6%时, 催化剂可稳定200 h以上. 表面吸附CO与积碳是导致催化剂失活的主要原因, 以Fe₃O₄作为高效的助剂, 进行水汽转换(WGS)反应与费托合成(FTS)可移除CO, 而采用煅烧法去除表面积碳. 晶相变化与纳米颗粒的聚集可能导致催化剂部分失活, 其原因以及再生方法需进一步考察.

关键词: 钌, 四氧化三铁, 催化剂稳定性, 3,4-二氯硝基苯, 原位液相加氢, CO中毒失活

Abstract:

Ru-Fe₃O₄/γ-Al₂O₃ was synthesized by stepwise impregnation method and applied to the in-situ liquid phase selective hydrogenation of 3,4-dichloronitrobenzene (3,4-DCNB). The nanoparticle size and distribution, metallic crystalline constitution, surface structure parameters, and adsorption species were systematically characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, N₂ adsorption-desorption (BET), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The Ru-Fe₃O₄/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst was investigated using the in-situ liquid phase hydrogenation of 3,4-DCNB as probe reaction, the effect of different reaction conditions and different synthetic factors on the catalytic properties was studied. Experimental results showed that the catalytic properties of the Ru-Fe₃O₄/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst were significantly influenced by its Fe₃O₄ content, under the optimum condition of 473 K, 3.0 MPa, 2% (w) 3,4-DCNB concentration with 75% ethanol and 25% water, the Ru-Fe₃O₄/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst with Ru and Fe mass fractions of 2% and 6% exhibited the highest activity and stability, with 100% conversion of 3,4-DCNB, 96.4% selectivity of 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4-DCAN), and this catalyst could be stabilized for more than 200 h. The main reason for the deactivation of the catalyst is CO coverage on active centers, and the poisoning-deactivated catalysts were regenerated by water-gasshift (WGS) reaction and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS), which employ Fe₃O₄ modified Ru/Al₂O₃ as catalyst due to its high efficiency of CO transformation. Carbon deposition on the catalyst surface is the reason second only to carbon monoxide poisoning, and this could be removed through calcination. Crystalline phase change and nanoparticles aggregation may cause partial deactivation, and investigation of the mechanism and catalyst regeneration are in progress.

Key words: Ruthenium, Iron oxide, Catalytic stability, 3,4-Dichloronitrobenzene, In-situ liquid phase hydrogenation, CO poisoning deactivation

陈傲昂, 许响生, 华焱祥, 顾辉子, 严新焕. Fe₃O₄改性的Ru/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂的原位液相加氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(04), 799-805. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302052

CHEN Ao-Ang, XU Xiang-Sheng, HUA Yan-Xiang, GU Hui-Zi, YAN Xin-Huan. Fe3O4 Modified Alumina Supported Ruthenium Catalyst for Novel In-situ Liquid Phase Catalytic Hydrogenation[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29(04), 799-805. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302052

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302052

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2013/V29/I04/799

参考文献

(1) Hao, Y. Z.; Li, Z. X.; Tian, J. L. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2007,265, 258. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2006.09.045
(2) Ma, L.; Chen, S.; Lu, C. S.; Zhang, Q. F.; Li, X. N. Catal.Today 2011, 173, 62. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.06.011
(3) Zhou, L.; Gu, H. Z.; Yan, X. H. Catal. Lett. 2009, 132, 16. doi: 10.1007/s10562-009-0036-6
(4) Jiang, L.; Zhu, Y. F.; Xiang, Y. Z.; Li, X. N. Chin. J. Catal.2007, 28, 281. [姜莉, 祝一锋, 项益智, 李小年. 催化学报,2007, 28, 281.]
(5) Yang, F.; Xu, X. S.; Gu, H. Z.; Chen, A. A.; Yan, X. H. ActaPhys. -Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 2141. [杨芳, 许响生, 顾辉子,陈傲昂, 严新焕. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28, 2141.] doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201206201
(6) Fang, Y. B.; Yan, X. H.; Sun, J. Q.; Xu, Z. Y.;Wang,W. J. Chin.J. Catal. 2005, 26, 233. [房永彬, 严新焕, 孙军庆, 徐振元,王文静. 催化学报, 2005, 26, 233.]
(7) Han, X. X.; Zhou, R. X.; Lai, G. H.; Zheng, X. M. React. Kinet.Catal. 2004, 83, 51.
(8) Kratky, V.; Kralik, M.; Mecarova, M.; Stolcova, M.; Zalibera,L.; Hronec, M. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2002, 235, 225. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00274-0
(9) Tijani, A.; Coq, B.; Figueras, F. Appl. Catal. 1991, 76, 255. doi: 10.1016/0166-9834(91)80051-W
(10) Yan, X.; Liu, M. H.; Liu, H. F.; Liew, K. Y. J. Mol. Catal.A-Chem. 2001, 170, 223. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00067-X
(11) Tu,W. X.; Liu, H. F.; Tang, Y. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2000, 159, 115.doi: 10.1016/S1381-1169(00)00179-5
(12) Zhang, J. L.;Wang, Y.; Ji, H.;Wei, Y. G.;Wu, N. Z.; Zuo, B. J.;Wang, Q. L. J. Catal. 2005, 229, 114. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.09.029
(13) Li, X. N.; Xiang, Y. Z. Sci. China Ser. B 2007, 50, 746. doi: 10.1007/s11426-007-0040-x
(14) Liu, L. Q.; Qiao, B. T.; Chen, Z. J.; Zhang, J.; Deng, Y. Q.Chem. Commun. 2009, 653.
(15) Fatsikostas, A. N.; Kondarides, D. I.; Verykios, X. E. Catal.Today 2002, 75, 145. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00057-3
(16) Deluga, G. A.; Salge, J. R.; Schmidt, L. D.; Verykios, X. E.Science 2004, 303, 993. doi: 10.1126/science.1093045
(17) Cortright, R. D.; Davda, R. R.; Dumesic, J. A. Nature 2002,418, 964. doi: 10.1038/nature01009
(18) Li, T. Z.; Yang, Y.; Tao, Z. C.; Zhang, C. H.; Xiang, H.W.; Li, Y.W. Fuel Process Technol. 2009, 90, 1247. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.06.006
(19) Hao, Q. L.; Bai, L.; Xiang, H.W.; Li, Y.W. Chin. J. Catal.2008, 29, 969. [郝庆兰, 白亮, 相宏伟, 李永旺. 催化学报,2008, 29, 969.]
(20) Wan, H. J.;Wu, B. S.; Li, T. Z.; Tao, Z. C. J. Fuel Chem.Technol. 2007, 35, 589. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(07)60036-X
(21) Emiel, D. S.; Andrew, M. B.; Sergey, N.;Weckhuysen, B. M.J. Catal. 2009, 262, 244. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2008.12.021
(22) Yan, X. H.; Sun, J. Q.;Wang, Y.W.; Yang, J. F. J. Mol. Catal.A-Chem. 2006, 252, 17. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2006.01.060
(23) Zhao, S. L.; Liang, H. D.; Zhou, Y. F. Catal. Commun. 2007, 8,1305. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.11.033
(24) Xu, H. Z.; Shi, J. H.;Wang, L. S.; Lü, L. X. Chin. J. Catal.1993, 14, 251. [徐慧珍, 施介华, 王利盛, 吕丽昕. 催化学报,1993, 14, 251.]
(25) Chen, Y. F.; Xu, H. Z.; Xu,W. L. J. Zhejiang Agric. Univ. 1998,24, 255. [陈幼芳, 徐慧珍, 徐伟亮. 浙江农业大学学报,1998, 24, 255.]
(26) Hilaire, S.;Wang, X.; Luo, T.; Gorte, R. J.;Wagner, J. Appl.Catal. A-Gen. 2001, 215, 271. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00535-X
(27) Farrauto, R. J.; Liu, Y.; Ruettinger,W.; llinich, O.; Shore, L.;Giroux, T. Catal. Rev. 2007, 49, 141. doi: 10.1080/01614940701220496
(28) Trimm, D. L. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2005, 296, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.011
(29) Rosso, I.; Galletti, C.; Saracco, G.; Garrone, E.; Specchia, V.Appl. Catal. B 2004, 48, 195. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.10.016

[1]	王正慜, 洪庆玲, 王晓慧, 黄昊, 陈煜, 李淑妮. 氮掺杂石墨烯气凝胶锚定RuP纳米粒子用于水合肼氧化辅助产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2303028 - .
[2]	陈丽芳,于聿律,桑雅子,程涛,刘岩,村上洋,原田雅史,王远. “非保护型”金属胶体纳米簇形成机理研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(1): 1907008 - .
[3]	刘甜,黎军,刘维佳,朱育丹,陆小华. 简单的配体改变调控钌配合物催化还原CO₂的活性：硼基配体的对位效应和Ru―H键的性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(10): 1097 -1105 .
[4]	王丹,刘传勇,龙玥,宋恺,黄维. 尺寸可控的单分散四氧化三铁微球的省时制备[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(11): 2310 -2316 .
[5]	毕慧子,窦镕飞,王浩,裴燕,乔明华,孙斌,宗保宁. Ru/氧化物催化剂在甲苯部分加氢反应中的载体效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(7): 1765 -1774 .
[6]	朱守圃,吴甜,苏海明,瞿姗姗,解永娟,陈铭,刁国旺. 水热法制备Fe₃O₄/rGO纳米复合物作为锂离子电池阳极材料[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(11): 2737 -2744 .
[7]	高爽, 颜见标, 丛德全, 随强盛, 夏延洋, 程东东, 包强, 王振旅, 王力彦. Sn改性的Ru/H-CMK-3催化剂的制备及其肉桂醛选择性加氢性能的研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(7): 1391 -1398 .
[8]	孙海杰, 李永宇, 李帅辉, 张元馨, 刘寿长, 刘仲毅, 任保增. ZnSO₄和La₂O₃作共修饰剂单金属Ru催化剂上苯选择加氢制环己烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(7): 1332 -1340 .
[9]	谭晓荷, 周功兵, 窦镕飞, 裴燕, 范康年, 乔明华, 孙斌, 宗保宁. 苯部分加氢制环己烯新型Ru-B/MOF催化剂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30(5): 932 -942 .
[10]	凌欢欢, 李楠, 杨帆, 吉昕, 夏勇, 曹都, 祁争健. 新型2-取代苯基-1H-咪唑[4,5-f][1,10]邻菲啰啉基Ru(II)配合物的光电性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(11): 2465 -2474 .
[11]	王亚南, 杨玉霞, 李永文, 赖俊华, 孙鲲鹏. Fe₃O₄修饰的Pt-Ru/C纳米催化剂的制备及其在无溶剂条件下邻氯硝基苯选择性加氢的催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(10): 2239 -2244 .
[12]	夏娟, 宋乐新, 党政, 邵志成. 聚乙二醇-四氧化三铁纳米粒子复合材料的结构、物理性质及应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(07): 1524 -1533 .
[13]	胡英瑛, 胡中爱, 张亚军, 鲁爱莲, 徐欢, 张子瑜, 杨玉英, 李丽, 吴红英. 氧化钌/石墨纳米片复合阵列电极的制备及其电容性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29(02): 305 -310 .
[14]	杨芳, 许响生, 顾辉子, 陈傲昂, 严新焕. 组合型Pt₃Sn/Al₂O₃催化剂用于芳香硝基化合物一锅法合成N-烷基芳胺[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(09): 2141 -2147 .
[15]	徐三魁, 李利民, 郭楠楠, 苏运来, 张朋. 葡萄糖加氢用Ru/活性炭催化剂: 改性方法对活性炭表面性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(01): 177 -183 .

Fe₃O₄改性的Ru/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂的原位液相加氢性能

Fe3O4 Modified Alumina Supported Ruthenium Catalyst for Novel In-situ Liquid Phase Catalytic Hydrogenation

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0