紫外臭氧处理增强溶液法MoO3薄膜的空穴注入能力

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201803222

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

空穴注入层对有机发光二极管的性能有重要的影响，尤其是当器件中的空穴传输材料的最高占据分子轨道能级较深的时候。近年来有许多关于新型的溶液法空穴注入材料的研究。在本文中，我们对溶液法MoO₃薄膜使用了三种不同的处理方法来研究其对空穴注入性能的影响，即：在空气中150 ℃退火；在空气中150 ℃退火再紫外臭氧处理(UVO) 15 min；只进行UVO处理15 min。结果发现当MoO₃薄膜在空气中150 ℃退火后，器件的电流最小，空穴注入能力最差。而当MoO₃薄膜经过UVO处理后，器件的电流显著增大，工作电压大幅下降，器件性能接近于蒸镀的MoO₃薄膜的器件。更惊喜的是，这种改善在MoO₃薄膜仅作UVO处理后也可获得。经定量计算发现MoO₃薄膜经过UVO处理后的空穴注入效率能提高到约0.1。XPS分析表明通过UVO处理后，MoO₃薄膜中Mo⁵⁺成分减少并且薄膜表面的富氧吸附物被有效地消除，使得其化学计量基本与蒸镀的MoO₃薄膜相同。基于这种经UVO处理的溶液法MoO₃作为空穴注入层，器件的最大电流效率可达到48.3 cd∙A⁻¹。

关键词: 空穴注入能力, 溶液法, 有机发光二极管, 化学计量, 紫外臭氧氧化

Abstract:

The hole injection layer (HIL) plays a significant role in determining the performances of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), especially when hole transport materials with deep highest occupied molecular orbital levels (HOMOs) are employed. Intensive efforts have been devoted to exploring novel hole injection materials with good solution-processing abilities in recent years. In this study, the solution-processed molybdenum trioxide (s-MoO₃) is prepared via an ultra-facile method. Three different s-MoO₃ layers prepared by three different methods, viz. layers annealed at 150 ℃ (s-MoO₃ (150)), layers annealed at 150 ℃ and then processed in UV-ozone for 15 min (s-MoO₃ (150, UVO)), and layers processed in UV-ozone for 15 min without annealing (s-MoO₃ (UVO)), are obtained to investigate their influences on hole injection. The device with the s-MoO₃ (150) layer has the lowest current density and the largest driving voltage, showing poor hole injection ability. In contrast, with the s-MoO₃ (150, UVO) layer as HIL, the OLED produces a greatly enhanced current and sharply reduced driving voltage, comparable to the device using vacuum-evaporated MoO₃. Similar results are obtained for the device with the s-MoO₃ (UVO) film, suggesting that high-temperature annealing is not essential for the s-MoO₃ film with UV-ozone treatment. Hole injection efficiencies of MoO₃ films are quantitatively characterized by analyzing the space-charge-limited current of hole-only devices; the hole injection efficiencies of s-MoO₃ (150, UVO) and s-MoO₃ (UVO)-based devices are ~0.1, far exceeding that of the s-MoO₃ (150)-based device (10⁻⁵). XPS analysis is performed to detect the impact of the above treatments on the surface electronic properties of the s-MoO₃ films. A typical characteristic of Mo⁵⁺ species is obtained for the s-MoO₃ (150) film and a high-binding-energy shoulder appears in the O 1s peak of the s-MoO₃ (150) film, indicating the existence of oxygen vacancies and oxygen adsorbed at the surface of s-MoO₃ (150) film. When UV-ozone treatment is applied to this s-MoO₃ (150) film, it produces a decrease of Mo⁵⁺ state and elimination of oxygen-rich adsorbates, resulting in MoO₃ stoichiometry similar to that of the vacuum-evaporated MoO₃ film. Consequently, a maximum current efficiency of 48.3 cd∙A⁻¹ is realized with the optimized UV-ozone treated s-MoO₃ HIL. It This UV-ozone treated s-MoO₃ should have widespread applications in low-cost solution-processed OLEDs as an excellent hole injection layer.

Key words: Hole injection property, Solution process, Organic light-emitting diode, Stoichiometry, UV-ozone treatment

董丹,闵志远,刘俊,何谷峰. 紫外臭氧处理增强溶液法MoO₃薄膜的空穴注入能力[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(11), 1286-1292. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201803222

Dan DONG,Zhiyuan MIN,Jun LIU,Gufeng HE. Improved Hole Injection Property of Solution-Processed MoO₃ with UV-Ozone Treatment[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2018, 34(11), 1286-1292. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201803222

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201803222

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2018/V34/I11/1286

图/表 7

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Table 1

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

参考文献 37

1	Tang C. W. ; Vanslyke S. A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913. doi: 10.1063/1.98799
2	Tang C. W. ; Vanslyke S. A. ; Chen C. H. J. Appl. Phys. 1989, 65, 3610. doi: 10.1063/1.343409
3	Burroughes J. H. ; Bradely D. D. C. ; Brown A. R. ; Marks R. N. ; Mackay K. ; Friend R. H. ; Burn P. L. ; Holmes A. B. Nature 1990, 347, 539. doi: 10.1038/347539a0
4	Lan L. H. ; Tao T. ; Li M. L. ; Gao D. Y. ; Zhou J. H. ; Xu M. ; Wang L. ; Peng J. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 1548. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704283
	蓝露华; 陶洪; 李美灵; 高栋雨; 邹建华; 徐苗; 王磊; 彭俊彪. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 1548. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704283
5	Xiang C. ; Koo W. ; So F. ; Sasabe H. ; Kido J Light-Sci. Appl 2013, 2, e74. doi: 10.1038/lsa.2013.30
6	Xu T. ; Yang M. J. ; Liu J. ; Wu X. K. ; Murtaza I. ; He G. F. ; Meng H. Org. Electron. 2016, 37, 93. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.06.014
7	Xu T. ; Zhang Y. X. ; Wang B. ; Huang C. C. ; Murtaza I. ; Meng H. ; Liao L. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2701. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b13077
8	Wu T. L. ; Yeh C. H. ; Hsiao W. T. ; Huang P. Y. ; Huang M. J. ; Chiang Y. H. ; Cheng C. H. ; Liu R. S. ; Chiu P. W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 14998. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b03597
9	D'Andrade B. W. ; Thompson M. E. ; Forrest S. R. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 147. doi: 10.1002/1521-4095(20020116)14:2<147::aid-adma147>3.0.co;2-3
10	Gather M. C. ; Köhnen A. ; Meerholz K. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 233. doi: 10.1002/adma.201002636
11	Huang J. ; Li G. ; Wu E. ; Xu Q. ; Yang Y. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 114. doi: 10.1002/adma.200501105
12	Gevaerts V. S. ; Furlan A. ; Wienk M. M. ; Turbiez M. ; Janssen R. A. J. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2130. doi: 10.1002/adma.201104939
13	Small C. E. ; Tsang S. W. ; Kido J. ; So S. K. ; So F. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 3261. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200185
14	Zhu Y. W. ; Yuan Z. C. ; Cui W. ; Wu Z. W. ; Sun Q. J. ; Wang S. D. ; Kang Z. H. ; Sun B. Q. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1436. doi: 10.1039/c3ta13762g
15	Helander M. G. ; Wang Z. B. ; Qiu J. ; Greiner M. T. ; Puzzo D. P. ; Lu Z. H. Science 2011, 332, 944. doi: 10.1126/science.1202992
16	Voroshazi E. ; Veneet B. ; Buri A. ; Muller R. ; Nuzzo D. D. ; Heremans P. Org. Electron. 2011, 12, 736. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.01.025
17	Jorgensen M. ; Norrman K. ; Kreb F. C. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2008, 92, 686. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.01.005
18	Kröger M. ; Hamwi S. ; Meyer J. ; Riedl T. ; Kowalsky W. ; Kahn A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 123301. doi: 10.1063/1.3231928
19	Liu J. ; Wu X. K. ; Chen S. ; Shi X. D. ; Wang J. ; Huang S. J. ; Guo X. J. ; He G. F. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 158. doi: 10.1039/c3tc31580k
20	Xu H. ; Zhou X. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 244505. doi: 10.1063/1.4852835
21	Kim C. ; Nguyen T. P. ; Le Q. V. ; Jeon J. M. ; Jang H. W. ; Kim S. Y. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 4512. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201501333
22	Wong K. H. ; Ananthanarayanan K. ; Luther J. ; Balaya P. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 16346. doi: 10.1021/jp303679y
23	Murase S. ; Yang Y. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2459. doi: 10.1002/adma.201104771
24	Hammond S. R. ; Meyer J. ; Widjonarko N. E. ; Ndione P. F. ; Sigdel A. K. ; Garcia A. ; Miedaner A. ; Lloyd M. T. ; Kahn A. ; Ginley D. S. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 3249. doi: 10.1039/c2jm14911g
25	Irfan I. ; Turinske A. J. ; Bao Z. ; Gao Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 093305. doi: 10.1063/1.4748978
26	Meyer J. ; Zilberberg K. ; Riedl T. ; Kahn A. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 033710. doi: 10.1063/1.3611392
27	Zilberberg K. ; Trost S. ; Schmidt H. ; Riedl T. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 377. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201100076
28	Zilberberg K. ; Trost S. ; Meyer J. ; Kahn A. ; Behrendt A. ; Hecht D. L. ; Frahm R. ; Riedl T. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 4776. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201101402
29	Hancox I. ; Rochford L. A. ; Clare D. ; Walker M. ; Mudd J. J. ; Sullivan P. ; Schumann. S. ; McConville C. F. ; Jones T. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 49. doi: 10.1021/jp3075767
30	Ratcliff E. L. ; Meyer J. ; Steirer K. X. ; Garcia A. ; Berry J. J. ; Ginley D. S. ; Olson D. C. ; Kahn A. ; Armstrong N. R. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 4988. doi: 10.1021/cm202296p
31	Liu S. ; Liu R. ; Chen Y. ; Ho S. ; Kim J. H. ; So F. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4528. doi: 10.1021/cm501898y
32	Meyer J. ; Khalandovsky R. ; Görrn P. ; Kahn A. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 70. doi: 10.1002/adma.201003065
33	Sarma D. D. ; Rao C. N. R. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1980, 20, 25. doi: 10.1016/0368-2048(80)85003-1
34	Kanai K. ; Koizumi K. ; Ouchi S. ; Tsukamoto Y. ; Sakanoue K. ; Ouchi Y. ; Seki K. Org. Electron. 2010, 11, 188. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.10.013
35	Lee H. ; Cho S. W. ; Han K. ; Jeon P. E. ; Whang C. N. ; Jeong ; K ; Cho K. ; Yi Y. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 43308. doi: 10.1063/1.2965120
36	Murgatroyd P. N. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1970, 3, 151. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/3/2/308
37	Cai M. ; Xiao T. ; Hellerich E. ; Chen Y. ; Shinar R. ; Shinar J. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3590. doi: 10.1002/adma.201101154

Structure	V_onset/V	L@10 V/ (cd∙m⁻²)	CE_max/ (cd∙A⁻¹)	CE@1 mA∙cm⁻²/ (cd∙A⁻¹)
s-MoO₃ (150)	5.0	58	7.5	0.7
s-MoO₃ (150, UVO)	2.6	33390	48.3	46.3
s-MoO₃ (UVO)	2.6	33300	46.1	45.0
e-MoO₃	2.6	32030	50.6	49.5

[1]	薛楷, 闫敏楠, 潘飞, 田梦颖, 潘旭东, 张宏梅. C₆₀与MoO₃混合材料做空穴注入层的单层有机电致发光器件[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(8): 896 -902 .
[2]	蓝露华,陶洪,李美灵,高栋雨,邹建华,徐苗,王磊,彭俊彪. 有机发光二极管光取出技术进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(8): 1548 -1572 .
[3]	檀康明,闫敏楠,王英男,解令海,钱妍,张宏梅,黄维. 基于激子和电致激基复合物双重发光的白光OLED[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(5): 1057 -1064 .
[4]	易庆华,赵杰,娄艳辉,邹贵付,刘忠范. 聚合物辅助设计生长高质量多功能薄膜[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(2): 314 -328 .
[5]	陈昊,杨涛,李杰伟,张新稳,钱妍,解令海,黄维. 可溶液加工的蒽醌/芴类双极性荧光材料的合成及其光电性质[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(9): 2346 -2354 .
[6]	关玉巧,宋娟,孙威,章琴,汤超,李雪,冯晓苗,钱妍,陶友田,陈淑芬,汪联辉,黄维. 一步法合成螺双芴及螺氧杂蒽衍生物及其在有机发光二极管中的应用：性能增强及相关的光学现象关[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(6): 1534 -1542 .
[7]	徐申东,方亮,丁晓丽. 影响TiMn_x非计量比合金储氢容量的结构因素[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(3): 780 -786 .
[8]	杨君礼, 武聪伶, 李源浩, 李菀丽, 苗艳勤, 郭鹍鹏, 刘慧慧, 王华, 吴永安. 氧化石墨烯掺杂PEDOT:PSS作为空穴注入层对有机发光二极管发光性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(2): 377 -383 .
[9]	刘佰全, 高栋雨, 王剑斌, 王曦, 王磊, 邹建华, 宁洪龙, 彭俊彪. 白光有机发光二极管的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31(10): 1823 -1852 .
[10]	申利莹, 吴晓明, 华玉林, 董木森, 印寿根, 郑加金. 利用Cs基衍生物作为n型掺杂剂改善蓝色有机发光二极管的效率[J]. 物理化学学报, 2012, 28(06): 1497 -1501 .
[11]	赵云龙, 段炼, 乔娟, 张德强, 王立铎, 邱勇. 基于双极性小分子的单层非掺杂红色荧光有机发光二极管[J]. 物理化学学报, 2010, 26(03): 531 -534 .
[12]	王烁;罗翀;赵颖;熊绍珍. 溶液法铝诱导晶化多晶硅薄膜[J]. 物理化学学报, 2008, 24(09): 1689 -1693 .
[13]	江卫军;赛喜雅勒图;乌云毕力格;其鲁;商士波. 非化学计量比的Li_1+xCoO₂正极材料的性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2007, 23(Supp): 56 -59 .
[14]	张锐;李杨;段炼;张德强;邱勇. 四(8-羟基喹啉)硼锂作为电子注入层的高效有机发光二极管[J]. 物理化学学报, 2007, 23(04): 455 -458 .
[15]	乔俊娟;孟祥敏;张晓宏;吴世康. 利用溶液法制备小分子有机化合物纳米线[J]. 物理化学学报, 2005, 21(01): 106 -109 .

紫外臭氧处理增强溶液法MoO₃薄膜的空穴注入能力

Improved Hole Injection Property of Solution-Processed MoO₃ with UV-Ozone Treatment

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0