La掺杂BiOI微球可见光下光催化氧化NO性能研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009100

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

光催化氧化技术被广泛认为是一种经济有效的治理低浓度NO的技术。三维BiOI微球是一种典型的可见光光催化剂，其光催化氧化NO的性能常受限于快速的光生载流子复合以及较差的导电性。然而，由于BiOI微球的尺寸较大，其与其它半导体或者助催化剂的复合通常不匹配，缺乏足够的接触界面。本文通过简易的一步水热法，首次采用稀土金属La掺杂策略改性BiOI微球，并系统研究了其可见光光催化氧化NO的性能。实验优化调整了La的前驱体以及掺杂量。研究结果发现，同LaCl₃和La(AC)₃相比，La(NO₃)₃的效果最佳。0.3%La/BiOI光催化氧化NO的转化率最优(74%)，远高于单纯的BiOI微球(44%)，且其在连续5次循环实验中也表现出优异的稳定性。理化性质分析发现，La掺杂可促进BiOI结晶，但对其形貌和结构几乎不产生影响。La³⁺可能会通过取代Bi³⁺进入BiOI的晶格中，或形成La₂O₃纳米簇均匀的分散在BIOI微球的介孔中。机理分析进一步发现，La掺杂不仅减小了BiOI的带隙，促进了对太阳光的吸收，而且可引入更多的氧空位，有利于水分子解离，生成更丰富的·OH。这些因素共同提升了BiOI光催化氧化NO的性能。此外，La/BiOI主要将NO氧化成NO₂，且形成的NO₂倾向于从催化剂表面脱附，这不仅保全了催化剂表面的活性位点，NO光催化氧化反应得以持续进行，而且可避免催化剂频繁洗涤再生，因此La/BiOI具有优异的稳定性，且使用寿命长。此外，生成的NO₂可轻易彻底地被尾部碱性液体吸收，有效避免了二次污染。本研究表明掺杂是一种有效改善三维BiOI微球光催化性能的改性方法，期待其可为各种应用于光催化反应的三维半导体材料的改性和合理设计提供新颖的思路。

关键词: La, BiOI微球, NO转化, 光催化氧化

Abstract:

Photocatalytic oxidation has been widely acknowledged as an economical and effective technology for the treatment of low-concentration NO. Three-dimensional (3D) BiOI microspheres, which are typical visible-light responsive semiconductor photocatalysts, often suffer from quick recombination of photogenerated carriers and unsatisfactory electrical conductivity when applied in NO photocatalytic oxidation reactions. However, owing to their micro-sized structures, they are usually difficult to couple with other semiconductors and co-catalysts because of their incompact interfaces that provide insufficient contact. In this study, a rare-earth metal (La) doping strategy was first adopted to modify BiOI microspheres via a simple one-step solvothermal method; subsequently, the photocatalytic NO oxidation performance under visible light illumination was systematically investigated. Further, the La precursors and doping contents were optimized. It was found that La(NO₃)₂ was the best precursor when compared to LaCl₃ and La(AC)₃. Moreover, 0.3%La/BiOI exhibited the best NO photocatalytic conversion efficiency of up to 74%, which was significantly higher than that of the pure BiOI benchmark (44%). It also exhibited excellent stability during the continuous 5-cycle experiments. Analysis of the physicochemical properties revealed that La doping facilitated the crystallization of BiOI without altering its morphology and structure. La³⁺ may enter the BiOI lattice by substituting Bi³⁺ or forming La₂O₃ nanoclusters that homogeneously scatter in the mesopores of BiOI microspheres. The analysis of the underlying mechanism further revealed that La doping not only enhanced the light harvesting properties by decreasing the bandgaps of BiOI and accelerating the charge separation and transfer dynamics, but also introduced more oxygen vacancies and facilitated the formation of more OH radicals by dissociating the water molecules. All these factors co-contributed to the promotion of NO photocatalytic oxidation activities. Furthermore, NO was mainly oxidized to NO₂ over La/BiOI, and the formed NO₂ tended to desorb from the catalyst surface, which not only maintained the intactness of active sites and facilitated the sustainable occurrence of NO photocatalytic oxidation reactions, but also prevented the photocatalysts from frequent washing-regeneration; therefore, these factors account for the superior photocatalytic stability of La/BiOI and its long-term operation. The formed NO₂ could be easily and totally absorbed by the tail alkaline liquid, thereby effectively avoiding secondary pollution. Therefore, this study elucidates that doping is indeed a feasible and effective approach for the modification of 3D BiOI microspheres, while providing inspiration for the rational design and modification of other 3D semiconductor materials for various photocatalytic applications.

Key words: La, BiOI microspheres, NO conversion, Photocatalytic oxidation

李钱, 胡静, 周易, 王海强, 吴忠标. La掺杂BiOI微球可见光下光催化氧化NO性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009100.

Qian Li, Jing Hu, Yi Zhou, Haiqiang Wang, Zhongbiao Wu. La-Doped BiOI Microspheres for Efficient Photocatalytic Oxidation of NO under Visible Light Illumination[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2021, 37(8): 2009100.

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009100

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I8/2009100

图/表 10

Fig 1

Fig 2

Table 1

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Table 2

Fig 8

参考文献 47

1	Zhao B. ; Wang S. X. ; Liu H. ; Xu J. Y. ; Fu K. ; Klimont Z. ; Hao J. M. ; He K. B. ; Cofala J. ; Amann M. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 9869. doi: 10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013
2	He H. ; Wang Y. ; Ma Q. ; Ma J. ; Chu B. ; Ji D. ; Tang G. ; Liu C. ; Zhang H. ; Hao J. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4172. doi: 10.1038/srep06092
3	Li G. ; Zhang D. ; Yu J. C. ; Leung M. K. H. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 4276. doi: 10.1021/es100084a
4	Yu Y. ; Li Y. ; Zhang X. ; Deng H. ; He H. ; Li Y. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 481. doi: 10.1021/es5040574
5	Chen L. ; Li J. ; Ge M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9590. doi: 10.1021/es102692b
6	Li Y. ; Gu M. ; Shi T. ; Cui W. ; Zhang X. ; Dong F. ; Cheng J. ; Fan J. ; Lv K. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020, 262, 118281. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118281
7	Zhang L. ; Yang C. ; Lv K. ; Lu Y. ; Li Q. ; Wu X. ; Li Y. ; Li X. ; Fan J. ; Li M. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 755. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63320-6
8	Chen Y. ; Tian G. ; Shi Y. ; Xiao Y. ; Fu H. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 164, 40. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.08.036
9	Feng X. ; Zhang W. ; Deng H. ; Ni Z. ; Dong F. ; Zhang Y. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 223. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.007
10	Dong G. ; Ho W. ; Zhang L. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 168-169, 490. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.01.014
11	Liu H. ; Cao W. ; Su Y. ; Wang Y. ; Wang X. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2012, 111–112, 271. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.10.008
12	Li Q. ; Gao S. ; Hu J. ; Wang H. ; Wu Z. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 5270. doi: 10.1039/C8CY01466C
13	Huang Y. ; Li H. ; Fan W. ; Zhao F. ; Qiu W. ; Ji H. ; Tong Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2016, 8, 27859. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b10653
14	Pan M. ; Zhang H. ; Gao G. ; Liu L. ; Chen W. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6240. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00626
15	Huang Y. ; Li H. ; Balogun M. ; Liu W. ; Tong Y. ; Lu X. ; Ji H. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2014, 6, 22920. doi: 10.1021/am507641k
16	Jiang J. ; Zhang X. ; Sun P. ; Zhang L. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 20555. doi: 10.1021/jp205925z
17	Di J. ; Xia J. ; Ji M. ; Xu L. ; Yin S. ; Zhang Q. ; Chen Z. ; Li H. Carbon 2016, 98, 613. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.11.015
18	Peng J. ; Zhao Y. ; Ul Hassan Q. ; Li H. ; Liu Y. ; Ma S. ; Mao D. ; Li H. ; Meng L. ; Hojamberdiev M. Adv. Powder Technol. 2018, 29, 1158. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2018.02.007
19	Li H. ; Yang Z. ; Zhang J. ; Huang Y. ; Ji H. ; Tong Y. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 423, 1188. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.301
20	Luo J. ; Zhou X. ; Ma L. ; Xu X. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2015, 410, 168. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2015.09.019
21	Yu X. ; Yang J. ; Ye K. ; Fu X. ; Zhu Y. ; Zhang Y. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2016, 71, 45. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2016.06.034
22	Liang J. ; Deng J. ; Li M. ; Xu T. ; Tong M. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 147, 307. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.08.016
23	Thi V. H. ; Lee B. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 96, 171. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.04.028
24	Xie Y. P. ; Wang G. S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 430, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.05.020
25	Nie J. ; Hassan Q. ; Jia Y. ; Gao J. ; Peng J. ; Lu J. ; Zhang F. ; Zhu G. ; Wang Q. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 356. doi: 10.1039/C9QI01152H
26	Hu J. ; Weng S. ; Zheng Z. ; Pei Z. ; Huang M. ; Liu P. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 264, 293. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.027
27	Yin S. ; Fan W. ; Di J. ; Wu T. ; Yan J. ; He M. ; Xia J. ; Li H. Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 513, 160. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.10.012
28	Reddy B. M. ; Katta L. ; Thrimurthulu G. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 467. doi: 10.1021/cm903282w
29	Rao F. ; Zhu G. ; Hojamberdiev M. ; Zhang W. ; Li S. ; Gao J. ; Zhang F. ; Huang Y. ; Huang Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 16268. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03961
30	Ji M. ; Xia J. ; Di J. ; Liu Y. ; Chen R. ; Chen Z. ; Yin S. ; Li H. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 331, 355. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.100
31	Liu C. ; Wang X. J. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 7720. doi: 10.1039/C6DT00530F
32	He R. ; Cao S. ; Yu J. ; Yang Y. Catal. Today 2016, 264, 221. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.07.029
33	Li Q. ; Sun Z. ; Wang H. ; Wu Z. J. CO₂ Util. 2018, 28, 126. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.019
34	Zhou M. H. ; Yu J. G. ; Cheng B. ; Yu H. G. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2005, 93, 159. doi: 10.1016/j.photoemphys.2005.03.007
35	Zhou M. ; Yu J. ; Cheng B. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137, 1838. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.028
36	Xie F. ; Mao X. ; Fan C. ; Wang Y. Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 2014, 27, 380. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.07.020
37	Xu K. ; Fu X. ; Peng Z. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 98, 103. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.013
38	Chai B. ; Wang X. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 7589. doi: 10.1039/c4ra10999f
39	Barama S. ; Davidson A. ; Barama A. ; Boukhlouf H. ; Casale S. ; Calers C. ; Brouri D. ; Domingos C. ; Djadoun A. Compte. Rendus Chim. 2017, 20, 7. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2016.05.017
40	Rong X. ; Qiu F. ; Rong J. ; Yan J. ; Zhao H. ; Zhu X. ; Yang D. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 230, 126. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.07.003
41	Ueno K. ; Misawa H. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 2011, 221, 2. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.04.014
42	Long M. ; Cai W. ; Kisch H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 548. doi: 10.1021/jp075605x
43	Szaciłowski K. ; Macyk W. ; Stochel G. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 4603. doi: 10.1039/B606402G
44	Di J. ; Xia J. ; Ji M. ; Wang B. ; Yin S. ; Xu H. ; Chen Z. ; Li H. Langmuir 2016, 32, 2075. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04308
45	Hou D. ; Hu X. ; Hu P. ; Zhang W. ; Zhang M. ; Huang Y. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 9764. doi: 10.1039/C3NR02458J
46	Hu Z. ; Li K. ; Wu X. ; Wang N. ; Li X. ; Li Q. ; Li L. ; Lv K. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 256, 117860. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117860
47	Hu Z. ; Yang C. ; Lv K. ; Li X. ; Li Q. ; Fan J. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 1745. doi: 10.1039/C9CC08578E

Sample	Surface area/(m²·g^-1)	Pore volume/(cm³·g^-1)	Pore size/nm
BiOI	80.93	0.33	5.90
0.1%La/BiOI	74.04	0.29	4.33
0.2%La/BiOI	76.83	0.25	4.41
0.3%La/BiOI	79.00	0.22	4.55
0.5%La/BiOI	79.51	0.32	4.27
1%La/BiOI	78.09	0.34	4.60

Sample	E_g (eV)	E_CB (eV)	E_VB (eV)
BiOI	1.46	-0.16	1.30
0.1%La/BiOI	1.38	-0.08	1.30
0.3%La/BiOI	1.45	-0.15	1.30
1%La/BiOI	1.45	-0.15	1.30

[1]	郑倩, 曹玥晗, 黄南建, 张瑞阳, 周莹. BN诱导BiOI富氧{110}面的暴露并增强其可见光催化氧化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(8): 2009063 - .
[2]	赫荣安, 陈容, 罗金花, 张世英, 许第发. 石墨烯量子点修饰的BiOI/PAN柔性纤维的制备及其增强的光催化活性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2011022 - .
[3]	何裕成, 谢科锋, 王优浩, 周东山, 胡文兵. 超快扫描量热技术表征高分子结晶动力学[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1905081 - .
[4]	弓程,向思弯,张泽阳,孙岚,叶陈清,林昌健. LaCoO₃-TiO₂纳米管阵列的构筑及可见光光催化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 616 -623 .
[5]	HIGAKI Tatsuya,JIN Rongchao. Structural Evolution Patterns of FCC-Type Gold Nanoclusters[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(7): 755 -761 .
[6]	FINZEL Kati.,BULTINCK Patrick.. The Influence of the Exchange-Correlation Functional on the Non-Interacting Kinetic Energy and Its Implications for Orbital-Free Density Functional Approximations[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(6): 650 -655 .
[7]	VON SZENTPÁLY László. Multiply Charged Anions, Maximum Charge Acceptance, and Higher Electron Affinities of Molecules, Superatoms, and Clusters[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(6): 675 -682 .
[8]	JIANG Xiaoyu,WU Wei,MO Yirong. Strength of Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonds[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(3): 278 -285 .
[9]	XUE Bai,CHEN Tiannan,SIEPMANN J.Ilja. Efficient Calculation of Absorption Spectra in Solution: Approaches for Selecting Representative Solvent Configurations and for Reducing the Number of Explicit Solvent Molecules[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(10): 1106 -1115 .
[10]	YOSHII Noriyuki,KOMORI Mika,KAWADA Shinji,TAKABAYASHI Hiroaki,FUJIMOTO Kazushi,OKAZAKI Susumu. Free Energy Change of Micelle Formation for Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate from a Dispersed State in Solution to Complete Micelles along Its Aggregation Pathways Evaluated by Chemical Species Model Combined with Molecular Dynamics Calculations[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(10): 1163 -1170 .
[11]	黄学辉,商晓辉,牛鹏举. SBA-15表面改性及其对介孔La_0.8Sr_0.2CoO₃钙钛矿型催化剂结构和性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(7): 1462 -1473 .
[12]	GOLMOHAMMADI Hassan,DASHTBOZORGI Zahra,KHOOSHECHIN Sajad. Prediction of Blood-to-Brain Barrier Partitioning of Drugs and Organic Compounds Using a QSPR Approach[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(6): 1160 -1170 .
[13]	GOLMOHAMMADI Hassan,DASHTBOZORGI Zahra,KHOOSHECHIN Sajad. Developing a Support Vector Machine Based QSPR Model to PredictGas-to-Benzene Solvation Enthalpy of Organic Compounds[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(5): 918 -926 .
[14]	张晓茹,许跃峰,沈守宇,陈媛,黄令,李君涛,孙世刚. 锂氧电池双功能还原石墨烯-LaFeO₃复合纳米催化剂的制备及性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(11): 2237 -2244 .
[15]	PRIYA B.,PALANIAPPAN L.. Effect of Chain Length on the Dipolar Interaction of Morpholine with Primary Alkanols[J]. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32(4): 855 -862 .