In2O3三维纳米结构的控制合成及高效光解水产氢活性研究

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201903047

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

开发高效、稳定光解水催化剂，对于缓解能源危机和环境污染问题具有重要意义。本工作中，通过简易水热策略制备了三维纳米结构的In₂O₃光催化剂，该光催化剂在三维结构上具有合适的自组装程度。为了研究合适的自组装程度对光催化制氢活性的影响，我们利用该催化剂在可见光和模拟太阳光下进行光催化产氢活性测试。结果发现，In₂O₃-150 (水热温度为150 ℃样品)的光催化活性最佳，这可能是由于其在三维结构上具有合适的自组装程度，这种合适的自组装程度有利于光在催化剂内部的反射以及气体的溢出。通过光催化循环测试，In₂O₃-150表现出优异的光催化稳定性。本工作突出了控制In₂O₃三维纳米结构自组装程度的重要性，并探讨了其在可见光和模拟太阳光下制氢的性能及机理。

关键词: In₂O₃, 三维纳米结构, 自组装, 光催化活性, 制氢

Abstract:

Exploring economical and efficient photocatalysts for hydrogen production is of great significance for alleviating the energy and environmental crisis. In this study, 3D In₂O₃ nanostructures with appropriate self-assembly degrees were obtained using a facile hydrothermal strategy. To study the significance of 3D In₂O₃ nanostructures with appropriate self-assembly degrees in photocatalytic hydrogen production, the photocatalytic performances of samples were evaluated based on the amount of hydrogen gas release under visible-light irradiation (λ > 400 nm) and simulated solar light illumination. Interestingly, the 3D In₂O₃-150 nanostructured photocatalyst (hydrothermal temperature was 150 ℃, denoted as In₂O₃-150) exhibited extremely superior photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity, which may have been caused by their unique structure to improve light reflection and gas evolution. The special structure can enhance light harvesting and induce more carriers to participate in photocatalytic hydrogen production. Despite possessing similar 3D nanostructures, the In₂O₃-180 photocatalyst exhibited poor photocatalytic activity. This may have been caused by the high self-assembly degree, which can hinder light irradiation and isolate a portion of the water. In addition, the 3D nanostructures could effectively make uniform the carrier migration direction, which is from the interior to the rod end. However, the direction of carrier migration of the In₂O₃-110 photocatalyst could transfer in various directions, whereas the In₂O₃-130 photocatalyst could transfer to both ends of the rod. This might cause partial migration to counteract each other. The compact cluster rod-like structure of In₂O₃-180 might prevent the light from exciting the carrier effectively. Through a photocatalytic recycling test, the 3D In₂O₃-150 nanostructured photocatalyst exhibited outstanding photochemical stability. This work highlights the importance of controlling the self-assembly degree of 3D In₂O₃ nanostructures and explores the performances of 3D In₂O₃ nanostructured photocatalysts in hydrogen production under visible light and simulated solar light.

Key words: In₂O₃, 3D nanostructures, Self-assembly, Photocatalytic activity, Hydrogen production

陈锐杰,李娣,方振远,黄元勇,罗必富,施伟东. In₂O₃三维纳米结构的控制合成及高效光解水产氢活性研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(3), 1903047. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201903047

Ruijie Chen,Di Li,Zhenyuan Fang,Yuanyong Huang,Bifu Luo,Weidong Shi. Controlling Self-Assembly of 3D In₂O₃ Nanostructures for Boosting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2020, 36(3), 1903047. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201903047

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201903047

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V36/I3/1903047

图/表 7

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

参考文献 55

1	Chen X. ; Shen S. ; Guo L. ; Mao S. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6503. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645
2	Kudo A. ; Miseki Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253. doi: 10.1039/b800489g
3	Tong H. ; Ouyang S. ; Bi Y. ; Umezawa N. ; Oshikiri M. ; Ye J. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 229. doi: 10.1002/adma.201102752
4	Wang X. ; Jing D. ; Ni M. Sci. Bull. 2017, 62, 597. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2017.04.021
5	Zhang C. ; Wu Z. J. ; Liu J. J. ; Piao L. Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 1492. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704141
	张弛; 吴志娇; 刘建军; 朴玲钰. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 1492. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201704141
6	Huang Y. ; Li D. ; Fang Z. ; Chen R. ; Luo B. ; Shi W. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019, 254, 128. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.082
7	Tang C. ; Zhang R. ; Lu W. ; He L. ; Jiang X. ; Asiri A. M. ; Sun X. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1602441. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602441
8	Chen X. ; Pan J. M. ; Yan Y. S. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32, 2794. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201609073
	陈香; 潘建明; 闫永胜. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32, 2794. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201609073
9	Shin S. S. ; Yeom E. J. ; Yang W. S. ; Hur S. ; Kim M. G. ; Im J. ; Seo J. ; Noh J. H. ; Seok S. I. Science 2017, 356, 167. doi: 10.1126/science.aam6620
10	Fujishima A. ; Honda K. Nature 1972, 238, 37. doi: 10.1038/238037a0
11	Wang X. ; Maeda K. ; Thomas A. ; Takanabe K. ; Xin G. ; Carlsson J. M. ; Domen K. ; Antonietti M. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76. doi: 10.1038/NMAT2317
12	Han Q. ; Wang B. ; Zhao Y. ; Hu C. ; Qu L. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2015, 54, 11433. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504985
13	Yang X. ; Chen L. ; Liu Y. ; Rooke J. C. ; Sanchez C. ; Su B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 481. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00829a
14	Zhou L. ; Zhuang Z. ; Zhao H. ; Lin M. ; Zhao D. ; Mai L. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1602914. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602914
15	Hara M. ; Kondo T. ; Komoda M. ; Ikeda S. ; Shinohara K. ; Tanaka A. ; Kondo J. N. ; Domen K. Chem. Commun. 1998, 3, 357. doi: 10.1039/a707440i
16	Luevano-Hipolito E. ; Torres-Martinez L. ; Sanchez-Martinez D. ; Cruz M. R. A. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 12997. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.192
17	Kwon Y. ; Soon A. ; Han H. ; Lee H. J. Mater. Chem.A 2015, 3, 156. doi: 10.1039/c4ta04863f
18	Wolcott A. ; Smith W. A. ; Kuykendall T. R. ; Zhao Y. ; Zhang J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 1849. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200801363
19	Takahara Y. ; Kondo J. ; Takata T. ; Lu D. ; Domen K. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 1194. doi: 10.1021/cm000572i
20	Yu H. ; Sun D. ; Liu J. ; Fang Y. ; Li C. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 17225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.139
21	Bao N. ; Shen L. ; Takata T. ; Domen K. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 110. doi: 10.1021/cm7029344
22	Li Q. ; Guo B. ; Yu J. ; Ran J. ; Zhang B. ; Yan H. ; Gong J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10878. doi: 10.1021/ja2025454
23	Shen S. ; Zhao L. ; Guo L. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 4501. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.043
24	Hong Y. ; Fang Z. ; Yin B. ; Luo B. ; Zhao Y. ; Shi W. ; Li C. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 6378. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.055
25	Holladay J. D. ; Hu J. ; King D. L. ; Wang Y. Catal. Today 2009, 139, 244. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039
26	Low J. ; Yu J. ; Jaroniec M. ; Wageh S. ; Al-Ghamdi A. A. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1601694. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601694
27	Nikolaidis P. ; Poullikkas A. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 597. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044
28	Lin L. ; Zhou W. ; Gao R. ; Yao S. ; Zhang X. ; Xu W. ; Zheng S. ; Jiang Z. ; Yu Q. ; Li Y. Nature 2017, 544, 80. doi: 10.1038/nature21672
29	King P. D. C. ; Veal T. D. ; Fuchs F. ; Wang C. Y. ; Payne D. J. ; Bourlange A. ; Zhang H. ; Bell G. R. ; Cimalla V. ; Ambacher O. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 205211. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.205211
30	Pan Y. ; You Y. ; Xin S. ; Li Y. ; Fu G. ; Cui Z. ; Men Y. ; Cao F. ; Yu S. ; Goodenough J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4123. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00266
31	Gan J. ; Lu X. ; Wu J. ; Xie S. ; Zhai T. ; Yu M. ; Zhang Z. ; Mao Y. ; Wang S. ; Shen Y. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1021. doi: 10.1038/srep01021
32	Cao S. ; Liu X. ; Yuan Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Liao Y. ; Fang J. ; Loo S. C. J. ; Sum T. C. ; Xue C. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2014, 147, 940. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.10.029
33	Ramos-Ramon J. A. ; Pal U. ; Cremades A. ; Maestre D. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 439, 1010. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.125
34	Wang X. ; Su J. ; Chen H. ; Li G. ; Shi Z. ; Zou H. ; Zou X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 16335. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b04395
35	Liu J. ; Li S. ; Zhang B. ; Wang Y. ; Gao Y. ; Liang X. ; Wang Y. ; Lu G. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2017, 504, 206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.053
36	Jiang Z. ; Jiang D. ; Yan Z. ; Liu D. ; Qian K. ; Xie J. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015, 170, 195. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.01.041
37	Ma D. ; Shi J. ; Zou Y. ; Fan Z. ; Shi J. ; Cheng L. ; Sun D. ; Wang Z. ; Niu C. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 7860. doi: 10.1039/c8nr00170g
38	Zhang Y. ; Zhang J. ; Nie M. ; Sun K. ; Li C. ; Yu J. J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 322. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-2887-7
39	Padmanathan N. ; Shao H. ; McNulty D. ; O'Dwyer C. ; Razeeb K. M. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 4820. doi: 10.1039/c5ta10407f
40	Al-Resheedi A. ; Alhokbany N. S. ; Mahfouz R. M. Mater. Res. 2014, 17, 346. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392014005000019
41	Tahir M. ; Tahir B. ; Amin N. ; Alias H. A. S. ; Alias H. Appl. Surface Sci. 2016, 389, 46. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.155
42	Wu M. ; Wang C. ; Zhao Y. ; Xiao L. ; Zhang C. ; Yu X. ; Luo B. ; Hu B. ; Fan W. ; Shi W. CrystEngComm 2015, 17, 2336. doi: 10.1039/c4ce02262a
43	Huang F. ; Yang W. ; He F. ; Liu S. Sensor. Actuat. B: Chem. 2016, 235, 86. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.05.060
44	Chen X. ; Li R. ; Pan X. ; Huang X. ; Yi Z. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 320, 644. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.072
45	Zhou X. ; Wu J. ; Li Q. ; Zeng T. ; Ji Z. ; He P. ; Pan W. ; Qi X. ; Wang C. ; Liang P. J. Catal. 2017, 355, 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.09.006
46	Tian N. ; Zhang Y. ; Li X. ; Xiao K. ; Du X. ; Dong F. ; Waterhouse G. I. N. ; Zhang T. ; Huang H. Nano Energy 2017, 38, 72. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.038
47	Zhang G. ; Lan Z. ; Wang X. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 5261. doi: 10.1039/c7sc01747b
48	Zhang G. ; Lan Z. ; Lin L. ; Lin S. ; Wang X. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 3062. doi: 10.1039/c5sc04572j
49	Fang Z. ; Hong Y. ; Li D. ; Luo B. ; Mao B. ; Shi W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 20521. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b04783
50	Li H. ; Bian Z. ; Zhu J. ; Zhang D. ; Li G. ; Huo Y. ; Li H. ; Lu Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8406. doi: 10.1021/ja072191c
51	Zhang L. ; Yu J. Chem. Commun. 2003, 16, 2078. doi: 10.1039/b306013f
52	Tian G. ; Chen Y. ; Zhou W. ; Pan K. ; Tian C. ; Huang X. ; Fu H. CrystEngComm 201, 13, 2994. doi: 10.1039/c0ce00851f
53	Zhou C. ; Shi R. ; Shang L. ; Zhao Y. ; Waterhouse G. ; Wu L. ; Tung C. ; Zhang T. ChemPlusChem 2017, 82, 181. doi: 10.1002/cplu.201600501
54	Zhou C. ; Shi R. ; Shang L. ; Zhao Y. ; Wu L. ; Tung C. ; Zhang T. Chin. J. Catal. 2018, 39, 395. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62963-2
55	Shi R. ; Chao Y. ; Bao Y. ; Zhao Y. ; Waterhouse G. ; Fang Z. ; Wu L. ; Tung C. ; Yin Y. ; Zhang T. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700803. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700803

[1]	雷明杰, 胡文婷, 林可心, 孙秀娟, 张澔珅, 钱烨, 康彤玥, 吴秀琳, 廖海龙, 潘园, 张玉微, 魏笛野, 高平. Co/Mn/Mo掺杂加速NiSe₂重构以提高其电催化尿素氧化性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(8): 100083 - .
[2]	刘雪, 王力鹏, 李璐伶, 王凯, 刘文举, 胡彪, 曹道帆, 江锋浩, 李俊国, 刘科. Cu基和Pt基甲醇水蒸气重整制氢催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(5): 100049 - .
[3]	王佳瑶, 潘桂旭, 王宁, 王诗涵, 朱耀麟, 李云锋. 基于分子水平调控的供体-π-受体型石墨相氮化碳光催化体系的制备及其高效生产H₂O₂[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(12): 100168 - .
[4]	管勤辉, 郭昱昊, 李娜, 李敬, 颜廷江. 分子筛介导的氧化铟催化剂用于增强光催化CO₂加氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2025, 41(11): 100133 - .
[5]	李美然, 宋英杰, 万鑫, 李洋, 罗毅奇, 贺业亨, 夏博文, 周华, 邵明飞. 镍钒水滑石电极用于可放大电催化5-羟甲基糠醛氧化耦合产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2306007 - .
[6]	薛仁杰, 马超, 何晶, 李雪超, 唐雁宁, 迟力峰, 张海明. 二维亚稳态自组装网格主客体识别中的催组装[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(9): 2309011 - .
[7]	陆世玉, 豆文钊, 张均, 王玲, 武春洁, 易欢, 王融, 金梦. 优化结晶度的CrS/CoS₂少层异质结非晶/晶态界面耦合增强水裂解和甲醇辅助节能制氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(8): 2308024 - .
[8]	冯辛, 郭可鑫, 贾春光, 刘博文, 次素琴, 陈俊翔, 温珍海. 耦合甘油高选择性转化为甲酸盐与制氢的酸碱双电解液流动电解器[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(5): 2303050 - .
[9]	雷永刚, 赵天宇, 黄锦鸿, 张颖贞, 臧雪瑞, 李晓, 蔡伟龙, 黄剑莹, 胡军, 赖跃坤. 金属碳化钨与液相染料光敏剂协同促进光催化制氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2206006 -0 .
[10]	蔡晓燕, 杜家豪, 钟光明, 张一鸣, 毛梁, 娄在祝. S-型异质结CeO₂/Zn_xCd_1−xIn₂S₄空心结构的构建及其可见光分解水制氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(11): 2302017 - .
[11]	黄悦, 梅飞飞, 张金锋, 代凯, Graham Dawson. 一维/二维W₁₈O₄₉/多孔g-C₃N₄梯形异质结构建及其光催化析氢性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(7): 2108028 - .
[12]	樊晔, 曹崇梅, 方云, 夏咏梅. 自交联共轭亚油酸囊泡基荧光纳米点的构筑及其荧光特性[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(3): 2002032 - .
[13]	李红英, 龚海明, 靳治良. In₂O₃修饰三维纳米花MoS_x构建S型异质结用于高效光催化产氢[J]. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38(12): 2201037 - .
[14]	李云锋, 张敏, 周亮, 杨思佳, 武占省, 马玉花. g-C₃N₄表面改性及其光催化制H₂与CO₂还原研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2009030 - .
[15]	梅子慧, 王国宏, 严素定, 王娟. 微波辅助快速制备2D/1D ZnIn₂S₄/TiO₂ S型异质结及其光催化制氢性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(6): 2009097 - .

In₂O₃三维纳米结构的控制合成及高效光解水产氢活性研究

Controlling Self-Assembly of 3D In₂O₃ Nanostructures for Boosting Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 55

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0