智能蜂窝状有序多孔薄膜：体系构建、响应性能及应用探索

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904042

物理化学学报 >> 2019, Vol. 35 >> Issue (12): 1341-1356.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904042

智能蜂窝状有序多孔薄膜：体系构建、响应性能及应用探索

殷鸿尧*(),于跃,李宗诚,张港鸿,冯玉军*()

四川大学高分子研究所，高分子材料工程国家重点实验室，成都 610065

收稿日期:2019-04-10 录用日期:2019-05-15 发布日期:2019-05-22
通讯作者: 殷鸿尧,冯玉军 E-mail:hyyin@scu.edu.cn;yjfeng@scu.edu.cn
作者简介:殷鸿尧，出生于1986年。2016年获中国科学院大学高分子化学与物理理学博士学位，随后入职四川大学，担任助理研究员。主要从事智能高分子材料和表面活性剂研究|冯玉军，出生于1971年，研究员、博士生导师。1999年获西南石油大学应用化学工学博士学位，2000-2004年先后在法国科研中心和法国石油研究院从事博士后研究及在法国波城大学担任助理研究员。2004年加入中国科学院成都有机化学研究所，2012年转入四川大学工作。主要从事智能软物质材料的研究
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金(2017M623029)

Smart Honeycomb-Patterned Porous Films: Fabrications, Responsive Properties, and Applications

Hongyao YIN*(),Yue YU,Zongcheng LI,Ganghong ZHANG,Yujun FENG*()

Polymer Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, P. R. China

Received:2019-04-10 Accepted:2019-05-15 Published:2019-05-22
Contact: Hongyao YIN,Yujun FENG E-mail:hyyin@scu.edu.cn;yjfeng@scu.edu.cn
Supported by:
the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2017M623029)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

蜂窝状有序多孔膜是一种典型的具有微、纳米尺寸的图案化高分子薄膜材料，在超疏水表面、光电材料、组织工程、生物医学、传感器等领域都具有良好的应用前景。表面形貌或性质具有可逆刺激响应特性的智能型多孔膜不仅拥有常规多孔膜的性能，而且还拥有独特的“开-关”功能，因此受到广泛关注。本文回顾了智能有序多孔膜近年的研究进展，重点对其体系构建、响应方式、机理、性能和相关应用进行了归纳与分析，评述了不同刺激响应多孔膜的特点及优劣势，探讨了智能多孔膜的优化设计及提高响应性能等问题，指出了目前面临的挑战，并展望了未来的发展方向。

关键词: 有序多孔薄膜, 呼吸图案法, 刺激响应, 润湿性, 形貌

Abstract:

Honeycomb-patterned porous films are polymer films with regular pore arrays on their surfaces. Since the pioneering work of François et al. in 1994, in which they used the breath figure (BF) technique to prepare honeycomb films, these highly ordered porous films have been attracting increasing interest in the past decades. Researchers are interested in the well-ordered pore arrays as they show great potential for use in many areas including superhydrophobic materials, photoelectric materials, tissue engineering, biomedicine, gas sensors, micro-reactors, to name just a few. Previous studies in this area have mainly focused on the preparation of porous films with regular microstructures and the effect of polymer architecture and casting conditions (such as temperature, relative humidity, and solvents) on the morphology. During the past two decades, considerable work has been devoted to identifying the mechanism of generation of well-ordered pore arrays during the BF process. Although the exact mechanism of film formation remains unclear, highly ordered honeycomb films can be produced from various polymers or polymer blends. In other words, currently, preparation of honeycomb films is not a major challenge. More recent studies in this area have concentrated on fabricating smart honeycomb films with reversible surface morphologies and/or properties. These smart films possess not only the properties of ordinary honeycomb films but also unique "on-off" switching functions. The research on stimuli-responsive smart honeycomb films is quite interesting in terms of both fundamental research and practical applications. Theoretically, the different scales and regular pore arrays provide an ideal model for studying the surface properties of porous materials under external stimulation, which is helpful in designing structured surfaces with desirable properties. From an application perspective, the "on-off" switching behavior imparts the films with additional functions that show high potential in a wide range of applications such as cell adhesion and controlled release, protein adsorption and separation, controlled drug release, etc. Thus far, honeycomb films with stimuli-responsive reversible surface morphologies, wettability, and fluorescence spectra have been developed, and the stimulus triggers have been mainly concentrated on temperature, pH, light, solvents, and gases. The main focus of this study is to describe the recent advances in smart honeycomb films, including fabrication strategies, triggers, "on-off" switching mechanisms, responsive behaviors, and related applications. Moreover, special attention is given to discussing the advantages and disadvantages of smart honeycomb films based on different triggers and design of smart honeycomb film systems with improved response properties. This study also discusses the challenges that concern the future development of smart honeycomb films and suggests several means of addressing those challenges.

Key words: Ordered porous film, Breath figure, Stimuli-responsiveness, Wettability, Morphology

殷鸿尧,于跃,李宗诚,张港鸿,冯玉军. 智能蜂窝状有序多孔薄膜：体系构建、响应性能及应用探索[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(12), 1341-1356. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904042

Hongyao YIN,Yue YU,Zongcheng LI,Ganghong ZHANG,Yujun FENG. Smart Honeycomb-Patterned Porous Films: Fabrications, Responsive Properties, and Applications[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica 2019, 35(12), 1341-1356. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904042

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201904042

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2019/V35/I12/1341

图/表 18

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表1

图9

图10

图11

图12

图13

图14

图15

图16

图17

参考文献 93

1	Widawski G. ; Rawiso M. ; François B. Nature 1994, 369, 387. doi: 10.1038/369387a0
2	Stenzel M. H. Aust. J. Chem. 2002, 55, 239. doi: 10.1071/CH02056
3	Hernandez-Guerrero M. ; Stenzel M. H. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 563. doi: 10.1039/C1PY00219H
4	Li Z. G. ; Ma X. Y. ; Hong Q. ; Guan X. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2015, 31, 393. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201412261
	栗志广; 马晓燕; 洪清; 管兴华. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31, 393. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201412261
5	Escalé P. ; Rubatat L. ; Billon L. ; Save M. Eur. Polym. J. 2012, 48, 1001. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.03.001
6	Feng X. J. ; Jiang L. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 3063. doi: 10.1002/adma.200501961
7	Li Z. ; Ma X. ; Kong Q. ; Zang D. ; Guan X. ; Ren X. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 18659. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06186
8	Chen S. ; Lu X. ; Hu Y. ; Lu Q. Biomater. Sci. 2015, 3, 85. doi: 10.1039/C4BM00233D
9	Bui V. T. ; Thuy L. T. ; Tran Q. C. ; Nguyen V. T. ; Dao V. D. ; Choi J. S. ; Choi H. S. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 320, 561. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.03.086
10	Zhu Y. ; Sheng R. ; Luo T. ; Li H. ; Sun J. ; Chen S. ; Sun W. ; Cao A. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 2487. doi: 10.1021/am200371c
11	Bui V. T. ; Thuy L. L. ; Choi J. S. ; Choi H. S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 513, 161. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.024
12	Yao B. ; Zhu Q. ; Yao L. ; Hao J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 332, 287. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.170
13	Martínez-Campos E. ; Elzein T. ; Bejjani A. ; García-Granda M. J. ; Santos-Coquillat A. ; Ramos V. ; Muñoz-Bonilla A. ; Rodríguez-Hernández J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 6344. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12832
14	Tu Z. ; Tang H. ; Shen X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 12931. doi: 10.1021/am502871t
15	Wu X. ; Wang S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 4966. doi: 10.1021/am301334s
16	Zhao Y. ; Shang Q. ; Yu J. ; Zhang Y. ; Liu S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 11783. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b03254
17	Chen S. ; Gao S. ; Jing J. ; Lu Q. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2018, 7, 1701043. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701043
18	Zhang H. ; Liu Y. ; Luo T. ; Zhao Q. ; Cui K. ; Huang J. ; Jiang T. ; Ma Z. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 3922. doi: 10.1039/C8PY00732B
19	Gao F. ; Wang W. ; Li X. ; Li L. ; Lin J. ; Lin S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 468, 70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.035
20	Yabu H. ; Shimomura M. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 5231. doi: 10.1021/cm051281i
21	Ting W. H. ; Chen C. C. ; Dai S. A. ; Suen S. Y. ; Yang I. K. ; Liu Y. L. ; Chen F. M. C. ; Jeng R. J. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 4819. doi: 10.1039/B900468H
22	Yu X. ; Zhong Q. Z. ; Yang H. C. ; Wan L. S. ; Xu Z. K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 3667. doi: 10.1021/jp513001k
23	Yabu H. ; Takebayashi M. ; Tanaka M. ; Shimomura M. Langmuir 2005, 21, 3235. doi: 10.1021/la050013w
24	Fang X. ; Men X. ; Chen H. ; Zhang Y. M. ; Sun H. ; Yin S. ; Qin W. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 512, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.007
25	Geping Z. ; Hongxia Z. ; Mengjun C. ; Hongguang L. ; Ye Y. ; Tiantai M. ; Jingcheng H. Chem. -Eur. J. 2017, 23, 7278. doi: 10.1002/chem.201605651
26	Liu C. ; Gao C. ; Yan D. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4128. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604429
27	Bertrand A. ; Dumur F. ; Mruczkiewicz M. ; Perrin M. ; Lartigau-Dagron C. ; Bousquet A. ; Vignau L. ; Billon L. ; Fasquel S. Org. Electron. 2018, 52, 222. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.10.022
28	Zhu C. ; Tian L. ; Liao J. ; Zhang X. ; Gu Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1803194. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201803194
29	Li L. ; Zhong Y. ; Ma C. ; Li J. ; Chen C. ; Zhang A. ; Tang D. ; Xie S. ; Ma Z. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4977. doi: 10.1021/cm902357m
30	Lu Y. ; Ren Y. ; Wang L. ; Wang X. ; Li C. Polymer 2009, 50, 2035. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.02.026
31	Wang Z. ; Zhang L. ; Liu J. ; Jiang H. ; Li C. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 10691. doi: 10.1039/C8NR01495G
32	Wang Y. ; Zhou W. ; Kang Q. ; Chen J. ; Li Y. ; Feng X. ; Wang D. ; Ma Y. ; Huang W. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 27001. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b06710
33	Lin F. W. ; Xu X. L. ; Wan L. S. ; Wu J. ; Xu Z. K. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 30472. doi: 10.1039/C5RA01605C
34	Mao Y. ; Mei Z. ; Wen J. ; Li G. ; Tian Y. ; Zhou B. ; Tian Y. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 257, 944. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.11.042
35	Cao T. T. ; Modigunta J. K. R. ; Male U. ; Huh D. S. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1801174. doi: 10.1002/admi.201801174
36	Wan L. S. ; Lv J. ; Ke B. B. ; Xu Z. K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 3759. doi: 10.1021/am1009277
37	Zhou H. J. ; Yang G. W. ; Zhang Y. Y. ; Xu Z. K. ; Wu G. P. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 11471. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b06521
38	Wan L. S. ; Li J. W. ; Ke B. B. ; Xu Z. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 95. doi: 10.1021/ja2092745
39	Zhang C. ; Wang X. ; Min K. ; Lee D. ; Wei C. ; Schulhauser H. ; Gao H. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2014, 35, 221. doi: 10.1002/marc.201300581
40	Yin H. Y. ; Feng Y. J. ; Billon L. Chem. -Eur. J. 2018, 24, 425. doi: 10.1002/chem.201704369
41	Wu B. H. ; Wu L. W. ; Gao K. ; Chen S. H. ; Xu Z. K. ; Wan L. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 3926. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12286
42	Zhang L. ; Chen L. ; Liu S. X. ; Gong J. ; Tang Q. ; Su Z. M. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 105. doi: 10.1039/C7DT03201C
43	Benoot N. ; Marcasuzaa P. ; Pessoni L. ; Chasvised S. ; Reynaud S. ; Bousquet A. ; Billon L. Soft Matter 2018, 14, 4874. doi: 10.1039/C8SM00137E
44	Ji E. ; Pellerin V. ; Ehrenfeld F. ; Laffore A. ; Bousquet A. ; Billon L. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 1876. doi: 10.1039/C6CC09898C
45	Wu B. H. ; Zhang C. ; Zheng N. ; Wu L. W. ; Xu Z. K. ; Wan L. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 1, 47. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.8b00031
46	Yin H.Y ; Bulteau A. L. ; Feng Y. J. ; Billon L. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 3, 1500623. doi: 10.1002/admi.201500623
47	Bunz U. H. F. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 973. doi: 10.1002/adma.200501131
48	Bai H. ; Du C. ; Zhang A. ; Li L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12240. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303594
49	Zhang A. ; Bai H. ; Li L. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9801. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00069
50	Wan L. S. ; Zhu L. W. ; Ou Y. ; Xu Z. K. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4024. doi: 10.1039/C3CC49826C
51	Muñoz-Bonilla A. ; Fernández-García M. ; Rodríguez-Hernández J. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 510. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.006
52	Escale P. ; Save M. ; Billon L. ; Ruokolainen J. ; Rubatat L. Soft Matter 2016, 12, 790. doi: 10.1039/C5SM01774B
53	Escale P. ; Save M. ; Lapp A. ; Rubatat L. ; Billon L. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 3202. doi: 10.1039/C0SM00029A
54	Ghannam L. ; Manguian M. ; François J. ; Billon L. Soft Matter 2007, 3, 1492. doi: 10.1039/B710282H
55	De Leon A. S. ; Malhotra S. ; Molina M. ; Calderon M. ; Munoz-Bonilla A. ; Rodriguez-Hernandez J. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4112. doi: 10.1039/C6PY00601A
56	Zhang Z. ; Hughes T. C. ; Gurr P. A. ; Blencowe A. ; Uddin H. ; Hao X. ; Qiao G. G. Polymer 2013, 54, 4446. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.033
57	Wu B. H. ; Zhu L. W. ; Ou Y. ; Tang W. ; Wan L. S. ; Xu Z. K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 1971. doi: 10.1021/jp5119212
58	Fei B. ; Lu D. L. ; Shen Q. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2018, 32, 1027. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2017.1393918
59	Yabu H. ; Hirai Y. ; Kojima M. ; Shimomura M. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 1787. doi: 10.1021/cm803476m
60	Fukuhira Y. ; Yabu H. ; Ijiro K. ; Shimomura M. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 2037. doi: 10.1039/B821183C
61	Cui L. ; Li B. ; Han Y. Langmuir 2007, 23, 3349. doi: 10.1021/la061769d
62	Cheng C. X. ; Tian Y. ; Shi Y. Q. ; Tang R. P. ; Xi F. Langmuir 2005, 21, 6576. doi: 10.1021/la050187d
63	Xu W. Z. ; Kadla J. F. Langmuir 2012, 29, 727. doi: 10.1021/la303835e
64	Jang J. H. ; Orbán M. ; Wang S. ; Huh D. S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 25296. doi: 10.1039/C4CP03083D
65	Chen S. ; Lu X. ; Zhu D. ; Lu Q. Soft Matter 2015, 11, 7420. doi: 10.1039/C5SM01769F
66	Min E. H. ; Ting S. R. S. ; Billon L. ; Stenzel M. H. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2010, 48, 3440. doi: 10.1002/pola.24129
67	Hernandez-Guerrero M. ; Min E. ; Barner-Kowollik C. ; Muller A. H. E. ; Stenzel M. H. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4718. doi: 10.1039/B807495J
68	Pan Y. V. ; Wesley R. A. ; Luginbuhl R. ; Denton D. D. ; Ratner B. D. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 32. doi: 10.1021/bm0000642
69	Hirvonen S. P. ; Rossi T. ; Karesoja M. ; Karjalainen E. ; Tenhu H. Colloid. Polym. Sci. 2015, 293, 2957. doi: 10.1007/s00396-015-3693-6
70	Nykänen A. ; Hirvonen S. P. ; Tenhu H. ; Mezzenga R. ; Ruokolainen J. Polym. Int. 2014, 63, 37. doi: 10.1002/pi.4559
71	Zhou Y. ; Huang J. ; Sun W. ; Ju Y. ; Yang P. ; Ding L. ; Chen Z. R. ; Kornfield J. A. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 4177. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b13525
72	Wang C. ; Mao Y. ; Wang D. ; Qu Q. ; Yang G. ; Hu X. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 683. doi: 10.1039/B715520D
73	Escale P. ; Van Camp W. ; Du Prez F. ; Rubatat L. ; Billon L. ; Save M. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 4710. doi: 10.1039/C3PY00643C
74	Escalé P. ; Rubatat L. ; Derail C. ; Save M. ; Billon L. Macromol. Rapid. Comm. 2011, 32, 1072. doi: 10.1002/marc.201100296
75	Marcasuzaa P. ; Pearson S. ; Bosson K. ; Pessoni L. ; Dupin J. C. ; Billon L. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 13068. doi: 10.1039/C8CC05333B
76	Yin H. Y. ; Feng Y. J. ; Liu H. B. ; Mu M. ; Fei C. H. Langmuir 2014, 30, 9911. doi: 10.1021/la501461n
77	Jochum F. D. ; Theato P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 7468. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35191A
78	Li L. ; Chen C. ; Li J. ; Zhang A. ; Liu X. ; Xu B. ; Gao S. ; Jin G. ; Ma Z. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2789. doi: 10.1039/B820279F
79	Wang W. ; Du C. ; Wang X. ; He X. ; Lin J. ; Li L. ; Lin S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 12116. doi: 10.1002/anie.201407230
80	Wei W. ; Dingfeng S. ; Xiao L. ; Yuan Y. ; Jiaping L. ; Aurelia W. ; Jiwoo Y. ; Lin W. Z. ; Won H. S. ; Zhiqun L. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 2139. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712100
81	Wang W. ; Yao Y. ; Luo T. ; Chen L. ; Lin J. ; Li L. ; Lin S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 4223. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b14024
82	Wei W. ; Fei G. ; Yuan Y. ; Shaoliang L. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2018, 36, 297. doi: 10.1007/s10118-018-2087-x
83	Xu Y. Y. ; Wang W. ; Chen J. H. ; Lin S. L. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 38, 2161. doi: 10.6023/cjoc201803037
	徐悦莹; 王伟; 陈健壮; 林绍梁. 有机化学, 2018, 38, 2161. doi: 10.6023/cjoc201803037
84	Cui L. ; Xuan Y. ; Li X. ; Ding Y. ; Li B. ; Han Y. Langmuir 2005, 21, 11696. doi: 10.1021/la051376z
85	Cui L. ; Peng J. ; Ding Y. ; Li X. ; Han Y. Polymer 2005, 46, 5334. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.018
86	Chen L. ; Liu R. ; Hao X. ; Yan Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 264. doi: 10.1002/anie.201812365
87	Jie K. ; Zhou Y. ; Yao Y. ; Shi B. ; Huang F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 10472. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b05960
88	Yin H.Y ; Liu H. B. ; Wang W. ; Feng Y. J. Langmuir 2015, 31, 12260. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02831
89	Su X. ; Cunningham M. F. ; Jessop P. G. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2655. doi: 10.1039/C3cc37816k
90	Jessop P. G. ; Mercer S. M. ; Heldebrant D. J. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7240. doi: 10.1039/C2ee02912j
91	De León A. S. ; Molina M. ; Wedepohl S. ; Muñoz-Bonilla A. ; Rodríguez-Hernández J. ; Calderón M. Langmuir 2016, 32, 1854. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04166
92	Heng L. ; Li J. ; Li M. ; Tian D. ; Fan L. Z. ; Jiang L. ; Tang B. Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 7241. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201401342
93	Yu X. ; Xie D. ; Lan H. ; Li Y. ; Zhen X. ; Ren J. ; Yi T. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 5910. doi: 10.1039/C7TC01331K

Film	PS-b-PEEA		PS-b-PAA/WCA at pH 3		PS-b-PAA/WCA at pH 10
Film	BCP-1	BCP-2	BCP-1	BCP-2	BCP-1	BCP-2
Continuous	85°	83°	82°	80°	68°	78°
Honeycomb	112°	110°	112°	110°	46°	65°
Micro-pillared	155°	150°	75°	90°	45°	70°

[1]	梁秋菊, 常银霞, 梁朝伟, 祝浩雷, 郭子宾, 刘剑刚. 结晶动力学策略在非富勒烯体系太阳能电池形貌调控领域的应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212006 -0 .
[2]	刘瑶钰, 王宇辰, 刘碧莹, Amer Mahmoud, 严凯. 钴钒水滑石纳米片用于电催化尿素氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2205028 -0 .
[3]	蒋伟杰, 蒋航, 刘威, 管鑫, 李云兴, 杨成, 魏涛. Pickering乳液模板构建生物刺激响应性蛋白质微球[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(12): 2301041 - .
[4]	段会梅, 王惠娟, 黄伟新. PVP封端剂对Pd纳米晶电催化氧化甲醇和乙醇性能的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(10): 2003005 - .
[5]	黄凡洋, 揭育林, 李新鹏, 陈亚威, 曹瑞国, 章根强, 焦淑红. 锂金属负极的可逆性与沉积形貌的关联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(1): 2008081 - .
[6]	张静, 王丽娜, 陈晓飞, 王玉峰, 牛成艳, 吴立新, 唐智勇. 氧化还原对Lindqvist型多金属氧簇复合物自组装的动态调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(9): 1912002 - .
[7]	张明, 赵凤起, 杨燕京, 李辉, 张建侃, 马文喆, 高红旭, 李娜. 两种形貌纳米Fe₂O₃对TKX-50热分解的催化性能研究[J]. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1904027 - .
[8]	潘明光,赵永升,曾小勤,邹建新. 偶氮苯基型离子液体溶液对空气中湿度的变色响应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(6): 624 -629 .
[9]	曹丹丹, 吕荣, 于安池. 高光学质量氮化碳薄膜的制备和表征[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(4): 442 -450 .
[10]	王喆,贾康乐,刘同庆,胡俊文,李学丰,董金凤. pH和光对复合型乳液拓扑结构的调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(1): 84 -91 .
[11]	周劲媛,张锦,刘忠范. 石墨双炔的合成方法[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(9): 977 -991 .
[12]	程晓蒙,焦东霞,梁志豪,魏金金,李宏平,杨俊佼. 聚苯乙烯-聚4-乙烯基吡啶两亲嵌段共聚物在CO₂膨胀液体中的组装行为[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(8): 945 -951 .
[13]	李文涛,雍佳乐,杨青,陈烽,方瑶,侯洵. 基于特殊润湿性材料的油水分离[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(5): 456 -475 .
[14]	韩杰,梁秋菊,曲轶,刘剑刚,韩艳春. 基于苝二酰亚胺类非富勒烯受体共混体系凝聚态结构调控[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(4): 391 -406 .
[15]	邓丹,周二军,魏志祥. 氟化策略：高效有机光伏材料的设计与应用[J]. 物理化学学报, 2018, 34(11): 1239 -1249 .

智能蜂窝状有序多孔薄膜：体系构建、响应性能及应用探索

Smart Honeycomb-Patterned Porous Films: Fabrications, Responsive Properties, and Applications

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 18

参考文献 93

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0