胺和水插层磷酸锰仿生模拟氢键网络用于电催化水氧化

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007031

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

自然界光合作用的析氧催化剂为不对称锰簇结构。催化中心除了自身特殊的结构外，还与周围氨基酸残基和水分子通过氢键来连接以提供高速的质子电子迁移通道。这些迁移通道对人工锰基析氧催化剂的开发和研究具有重要的启发意义，但却较少受到关注。本文通过简单的共沉淀法制备了一种夹有乙二胺离子和水分子的磷酸锰纳米片，磷酸锰与层间分子通过氢键连接，形成了氢键网络，一定程度上模拟了自然界析氧中心的外围结构。与氢键网络被破坏的磷酸锰纳米片相比，这种含有丰富、广泛和连续氢键网络的磷酸锰纳米片在中性条件下具有较高的催化析氧性能。磷酸锰纳米片中的氢键网络具有与光系统II中氢键网络类似的功能，它加快了质子的转移速率，从而促进电催化水氧化。

关键词: 电催化, 析氧反应, 水氧化, 磷酸锰, 氢键

Abstract:

Asymmetric manganese cluster, the active center of photosystem II (PSII) in nature, is hydrogen-bonded to surrounding amino acid residues and water molecules. This phenomenon is of great inspiration significance for developing and studying artificial Mn-based oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts. Herein, we prepared manganese phosphate nanosheets through intercalation of ethylenediamine ions and water molecules ((EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi) using a simple co-precipitation method. (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi is also hydrogen-bonded to interlayer ethylenediamine ions and water molecules, forming a hydrogen-bonding network. The morphology of the (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi sample was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy. The thickness of (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi was characterized by atomic force microscopy. The composition and structure of (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. For control studies, manganese phosphate (EDAI)MnPi and (H₂O)MnPi samples were also synthesized. The structure and morphology of (EDAI)MnPi and (H₂O)MnPi samples were characterized by XRD and SEM. The difference between (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi, (EDAI)MnPi, and (H₂O)MnPi were further characterized by thermal gravimetric analysis and derivative thermogravimetric analysis. Electrocatalytic properties of the (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi, (EDAI)MnPi, and (H₂O)MnPi for OER were studied in 0.05 mol∙L⁻¹ pH = 7 phosphate buffered saline solution, through linear sweep voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and controlled potential electrolysis (CPE) test. The electrochemical surface area (ECSA) analyses of (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi, (EDAI)MnPi, and (H₂O)MnPi samples were recorded by charging currents in the non-Faradaic potential region at different scan rates. Considering the different ECSAs of different materials, the water oxidation activities of three materials were normalized by ECSA. Compared with counterparts of (EDAI)MnPi (610 mV) and (H₂O)MnPi (580 mV), manganese phosphate nanosheets (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi exhibited a lower overpotential of 520 mV when driving a current density of 1 mA∙cm⁻² in neutral conditions. The CPE experiment revealed that (EDAI)(H₂O)MnPi remained active for at least 10 h. Manganese phosphate nanosheets containing a rich, extensive, and continuous hydrogen bond network exhibited improved OER performance in neutral conditions. The hydrogen-bonding network in manganese phosphate nanosheets has similar functions to the hydrogen-bonding network in PSII, which could accelerate the transfer rate of protons and facilitate electrocatalytic water oxidation. This study may provide guidance for the design of water oxidation catalysts with rich hydrogen bond network.

Key words: Electrocatalysis, Oxygen evolution reaction, Water oxidation, Manganese phosphate, Hydrogen bond

点击下载补充材料PDF格式文件

高学庆, 杨树姣, 张伟, 曹睿. 胺和水插层磷酸锰仿生模拟氢键网络用于电催化水氧化[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7), 2007031. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007031

Xueqing Gao, Shujiao Yang, Wei Zhang, Rui Cao. Biomimicking Hydrogen-Bonding Network by Ammoniated and Hydrated Manganese (Ⅱ) Phosphate for Electrocatalytic Water Oxidation[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(7), 2007031. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007031

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007031

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I7/2007031

图/表 6

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

参考文献 46

1	Dogutan D. K. ; Nocera D. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 3143. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00380
2	Gao X. ; Chen Y. ; Sun T. ; Huang J. ; Zhang W. ; Wang Q. ; Cao R. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 174. doi: 10.1039/c9ee02380a
3	Li P. ; Zhao R. ; Chen H. ; Wang H. ; Wei P. ; Huang H. ; Liu Q. ; Li T. ; Shi X. ; Zhang Y. ; et al Small 2019, 15, 1805103. doi: 10.1002/smll.201805103
4	Odella E. ; Mora S. J. ; Wadsworth B. L. ; Goings J. J. ; Gervaldo M. A. ; Sereno L. E. ; Groy T. L. ; Gust D. ; Moore T. A. ; Moore G. F. ; et al Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 3820. doi: 10.1039/c9sc06010c
5	Devi T. ; Lee Y. -M. ; Nam W. ; Fukuzumi S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 410, 213219. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213219
6	Siegbahn P. E. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1871. doi: 10.1021/ar900117k
7	Harriman A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 573 doi: 10.1002/ejic.201301540
8	Zhao D. ; Zhuang Z. ; Cao X. ; Zhang C. ; Peng Q. ; Chen C. ; Li Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 2215. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00869a
9	Ye S. ; Ding C. ; Liu M. ; Wang A. ; Huang Q. ; Li C. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1902069. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902069
10	Fukuzumi S. ; Lee Y.-M. ; Nam W. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 779. doi: 10.1039/c8dt04341h
11	Mavrokefalos C. K. ; Patzke G. R. Inorganics 2019, 7, 29. doi: 10.3390/inorganics7030029
12	Sun W. ; Lin J. ; Liang X. ; Yang J. ; Ma B. ; Ding Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905025.
	孙万军; 林军奇; 梁向明; 杨峻懿; 马宝春; 丁勇. 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905025. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905025
13	Shaffer D. W. ; Xie Y. ; Concepcion J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6170. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00542c
14	Shen J. R. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 2015, 66, 23. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120129
15	Yano J. ; Yachandra V. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 4175. doi: 10.1021/cr4004874
16	Lubitz W. ; Chrysina M. ; Cox N. Photosynth. Res. 2019, 142, 105. doi: 10.1007/s11120-019-00648-3
17	Wang Y. ; Suzuki H. ; Xie J. ; Tomita O. ; Martin D. J. ; Higashi M. ; Kong D. ; Abe R. ; Tang J. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5201. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00286
18	Li Z. ; Wang W. ; Ding C. ; Wang Z. ; Liao S. ; Li C. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 765. doi: 10.1039/c6ee03401b
19	Zaharieva I. ; Najafpour M. M. ; Wiechen M. ; Haumann M. ; Kurz P. ; Dau H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2400. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00815j
20	Najafpour M. M. ; Zarei Ghobadi M. ; Sarvi B. ; Madadkhani S. ; Jafarian Sedigh D. ; Rafighi P. ; Tavahodi M. ; Shen J. -R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 5504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.01.131
21	McCool N. S. ; Robinson D. M. ; Sheats J. E. ; Dismukes G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11446. doi: 10.1021/ja203877y
22	Ye S. ; Ding C. ; Chen R. ; Fan F. ; Fu P. ; Yin H. ; Wang X. ; Wang Z. ; Du P. ; Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3250. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10662
23	Zhang T. ; Wang C. ; Liu S. ; Wang J. L. ; Lin W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 273. doi: 10.1021/ja409267p
24	Hou H. J. M. Materials 2011, 4, 1693. doi: 10.3390/ma4101693
25	Yamaguchi A. ; Inuzuka R. ; Takashima T. ; Hayashi T. ; Hashimoto K. ; Nakamura R. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4256. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5256
26	Kurz P. Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 371, 49. doi: 10.1007/128_2015_634
27	Najafpour M. M. ; Ghobadi M. Z. ; Haghighi B. ; Eaton-Rye J. J. ; Tomo T. ; Shen J. R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Biochemistry-Moscow 2014, 79, 324. doi: 10.1134/s0006297914040026
28	Jin K. ; Park J. ; Lee J. ; Yang K. D. ; Pradhan G. K. ; Sim U. ; Jeong D. ; Jang H. L. ; Park S. ; Kim D. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7435. doi: 10.1021/ja5026529
29	Najafpour M. M. ; Renger G. ; Holynska M. ; Moghaddam A. N. ; Aro E. -M. ; Carpentier R. ; Nishihara H. ; Eaton-Rye J. J. ; Shen J. -R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 2886. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00340
30	Najafpour M. M. ; Zaharieva I. ; Zand Z. ; Hosseini S. M. ; Kouzmanova M. ; Holynska M. ; Tranca I. ; Larkum A. W. ; Shen J. -R. ; Allakhverdiev S. I. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 409, 213183. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213183
31	Dau H. ; Zaharieva I. ; Haumann M. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2012, 16, 3. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.02.011
32	Singh B. ; Indra A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2020, 506, 119440. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2020.119440
33	Xiao Y. ; Zhu Q. ; Yang Y. ; Wang W. ; Kuang T. ; Shen J. -R. ; Han G. Photosynth. Res. 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11120-020-00753-8
34	Sugiura M. ; Taniguchi T. ; Tango N. ; Nakamura M. ; Selles J. ; Boussac A. Physiol. Plant. 2020. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13115
35	Lee Y. V. ; Tian B. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 2189. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00388
36	Petrie S. ; Terrett R. ; Stranger R. ; Pace R. J. ChemPhysChem 2020, 21, 785. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201901106
37	Mueh F. ; Zouni A. Protein Sci. 2020, 29, 1090. doi: 10.1002/pro.3841
38	Umena Y. ; Kawakami K. ; Shen J. R. ; Kamiya N. Nature 2011, 473, 55. doi: 10.1038/nature09913
39	Vogt L. ; Vinyard D. J. ; Khan S. ; Brudvig G. W. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015, 25, 152. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.12.040
40	Guerra F. ; Siemers M. ; Mielack C. ; Bondar A.-N. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 4625. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b00649
41	Isobe H. ; Shoji M. ; Shen J. -R. ; Yamaguchi K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 13922. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05740
42	Shoji M. ; Isobe H. ; Yamanaka S. ; Umena Y. ; Kawakami K. ; Kamiya N. ; Shen J. -R. ; Nakajima T. ; Yamaguchi K. Mol. Phys. 2015, 113, 359. doi: 10.1080/00268976.2014.960021
43	Li Y. ; Yao R. ; Chen Y. ; Xu B. ; Chen C. ; Zhang C. Catalysts 2020, 10, 185. doi: 10.3390/catal10020185
44	Dismukes G. C. ; Brimblecombe R. ; Felton G. A. N. ; Pryadun R. S. ; Sheats J. E. ; Spiccia L. ; Swiegers G. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1935. doi: 10.1021/ar900249x
45	Escobal J. ; Pizarro J. L. ; Mesa J. L. ; Lezama L. ; Olazcuaga R. ; Arriortua M. I. ; Rojo T. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 376. doi: 10.1021/cm9910815
46	Zhao H. R. ; Xue C. ; Li C. P. ; Zhang K. M. ; Luo H. B. ; Liu S. X. ; Ren X. M. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 8971. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01438

[1]	张珹博, 陶晓萍, 蒋文超, 郭俊雪, 张鹏飞, 李灿, 李仁贵. 微波辅助合成促进铬酸铋晶体的光生电荷分离[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303034 - .
[2]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[3]	段欣漩, Sendeku Marshet Getaye, 张道明, 周道金, 徐立军, 高学庆, 陈爱兵, 邝允, 孙晓明. 钨掺杂镍铁水滑石高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303055 - .
[4]	王宁, 李一, 崔乾, 孙晓玥, 胡悦, 罗运军, 杜然. 金属气凝胶：可控制备与应用展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212014 -0 .
[5]	胡荣, 韦丽云, 鲜靖林, 房光钰, 吴植傲, 樊淼, 郭家越, 李青翔, 刘凯思, 姜会钰, 徐卫林, 万骏, 姚永刚. 微波热冲快速制备二维多孔La_0.2Sr_0.8CoO₃钙钛矿用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212025 -0 .
[6]	夏伟锋, 季成宇, 王锐, 裘式纶, 方千荣. 基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212057 -0 .
[7]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[8]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[9]	韩慧贤, 陈澜, 赵建成, 于海涛, 汪洋, 闫何恋, 王英雄, 薛智敏, 牟天成. 生物质基酸性低共熔溶剂用于高效溶解木质素及溶解机理[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(7): 2212043 -0 .
[10]	杨帅, 徐瑜歆, 郝子坤, 秦胜建, 张润鹏, 韩钰, 杜利伟, 朱紫洢, 杜安宁, 陈欣, 吴昊, 乔冰冰, 李坚, 王艺, 孙昺晨, 闫融融, 赵晋津. 高效医学传感钙钛矿材料研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211025 -0 .
[11]	荣佑文, 桑佳琪, 车丽, 高敦峰, 汪国雄. 二氧化碳电催化还原中的电解质效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212027 -0 .
[12]	许义飞, 杨瀚文, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 电催化动力学简介[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2210025 -0 .
[13]	王奥琦, 陈军, 张鹏飞, 唐珊, 冯兆池, 姚婷婷, 李灿. NiMo(O)物相结构与电解水析氢反应活性的关联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2301023 -0 .
[14]	胡洋, 刘斌, 徐路遥, 董自强, 仵亚婷, 刘杰, 钟澄, 胡文彬. 基于微流控技术平台的Pt基三元电催化剂高通量合成和筛选[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209004 -0 .
[15]	徐斯然, 吴奇, 卢帮安, 唐堂, 张佳楠, 胡劲松. “绿氢”工业化碱性催化剂研究现状及未来展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2209001 -0 .