镍基金属有机框架及其衍生物在电催化析氧反应中的研究进展

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009074

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (7): 2009074.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009074

所属专题：电催化

镍基金属有机框架及其衍生物在电催化析氧反应中的研究进展

徐冰妍¹, 张应¹, 皮业灿², 邵琪², 黄小青¹^,*()

¹ 厦门大学化学化工学院，福建厦门 361005
² 苏州大学材料与化学化工学部，江苏苏州 215123

收稿日期:2020-09-23 录用日期:2020-10-26 发布日期:2020-10-30
通讯作者: 黄小青 E-mail:hxq006@xmu.edu.cn
作者简介:Dr. Xiaoqing Huang is currently a professor at College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University. He obtained his B.Sc. in chemistry education from Southwest Normal University (2005) and Ph.D. in organic chemistry from Xiamen University (2011). His current research interests are in the design of nanoscale materials for heterogenous catalysis, electrocatalysis, energy conversion and beyond
基金资助:
厦门大学高层次人才科研启动基金(0040/X2303321)

Research Progress of Nickel-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks and Their Derivatives for Oxygen Evolution Catalysis

Bingyan Xu¹, Ying Zhang¹, Yecan Pi², Qi Shao², Xiaoqing Huang¹^,*()

¹ College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, China
² College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China

Received:2020-09-23 Accepted:2020-10-26 Published:2020-10-30
Contact: Xiaoqing Huang E-mail:hxq006@xmu.edu.cn
About author:Xiaoqing Huang, Email:hxq006@xmu.edu.cn
Supported by:
the Start-Up Support from Xiamen University, China(0040/X2303321)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

作为未来最有潜力的制氢技术之一，电解水为解决环境污染和能源危机等问题提供了一种有效的解决途径。然而，阳极析氧反应缓慢的动力学和较高的过电位使其成为电解水装置效率提升的主要瓶颈。因此，开发高活性和高稳定性的析氧反应催化剂对于电解水技术的发展具有重要意义。近年来，镍基金属有机框架材料因其具有丰富可调的拓扑结构、较大的比表面积以及多孔特性，在催化领域受到了越来越多的关注。本文综述了镍基金属有机框架及其衍生材料在析氧催化研究中的最新进展。首先简要介绍了镍基材料在析氧反应中的原理及评价析氧催化剂活性的一些重要参数，并列举了几种镍基金属有机框架材料的结构及其在催化中的优势。随后，结合近年来发表的文献，对单金属、双金属和三金属镍基金属有机框架材料及其衍生物在析氧催化中的研究进展进行了总结与讨论，重点分析了该类材料的设计策略和催化机理。最后对该领域目前所面临的主要挑战以及未来的发展趋势进行了总结与展望。

关键词: 析氧反应, 电催化, 镍基金属有机框架, 水裂解, 氧化还原活性位点

Abstract:

As one of the most promising hydrogen production technologies, electrochemical water splitting is an effective measure for solving environmental pollution and energy crises. However, the slow kinetics and high overpotential of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) are the primary deterrents for improving the efficiency of water splitting devices. Iridium- and ruthenium-based noble metal catalysts are extremely expensive, which limits the industrial-scale development of this technology. Therefore, the development of oxygen evolution catalysts with high activity, excellent stability, and low costs is significantly important for water splitting technologies. Nickel-based materials meet the requirements of high abundance, cost-effectiveness, and high activity. In recent years, nickel-based metal organic frameworks (Ni-based MOFs) have attracted increasing research attention owing to their diverse and tunable topological structures and large specific surface areas. Furthermore, the mesoporous three-dimensional structure of MOFs can promote the diffusion of reactants, rendering them excellent candidates for catalytic applications. In order to utilize the advantages of Ni-MOFs more efficiently, the following methods are usually used to improve their catalytic performance. Owing to their unique properties, metal nodes can be replaced without affecting the MOF skeleton. As iron series metals, Co and Fe doping show unique catalytic activity and structural stability due to the synergistic effect between metal centers. Further, Ni-MOFs can simultaneously be used as precursors for oxidation, phosphating, or vulcanization to obtain Ni-MOF derivatives with different components. Among them, high-temperature carbonization treatment can make use of abundant organic ligands of Ni-MOFs to form a partially graphitized carbon-based framework, thereby augmenting conductivity, preventing the aggregation and corrosion of transition metals, and improving the overall support strength. The catalytic performance of oxygen production can be further improved by directly growing the Ni-MOFs on the substrate and introducing other active substances or conductive materials. Herein, the latest developments of Ni-based MOFs and their derivatives have been reviewed with regard to their utilization in OER catalysis, including nickel oxides, nickel hydroxides, nickel phosphides, nickel sulfides, and carbon composite materials. First, the mechanism and measurement criteria of the OER are briefly introduced. Second, the structures of several typical Ni-based MOFs (MOF-74, MILs, PBAs, and ZIFs) and their preparation methods are described. Subsequently, recent advances in the application of Ni-based MOFs and their derivatives in the OER are discussed, with an emphasis on materials design strategies and catalytic mechanisms. Finally, the main challenges and opportunities in this field are proposed.

Key words: Oxygen evolution reaction, Electrocatalysis, Nickel-based metal-organic frameworks, Water-splitting, Redox active site

徐冰妍, 张应, 皮业灿, 邵琪, 黄小青. 镍基金属有机框架及其衍生物在电催化析氧反应中的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7), 2009074. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009074

Bingyan Xu, Ying Zhang, Yecan Pi, Qi Shao, Xiaoqing Huang. Research Progress of Nickel-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks and Their Derivatives for Oxygen Evolution Catalysis[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(7), 2009074. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009074

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009074

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I7/2009074

图/表 17

Table 1

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Fig 11

Fig 12

Fig 13

Fig 14

Table 2

Table 3

Comparison of the OER performance of bimetallic and trimetallic Ni-MOFs and their derivatives materials."

	Catalyst	Substrate	Electrolyte (KOH)	η at 10 mA∙cm⁻² (mV)	Tafel slope/(mV∙dec⁻1)	Ref.
NiFe-MOF	NiFe-MOF-74	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	223	72	56
	FeNi-DOBDC-(Fe/Ni 3:1)	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	270 (at 50 mA∙cm⁻²)	49	57
	MIL-100(FeNi)	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	243 (at 50 mA∙cm⁻²)	30	64
	FeNi₃-BTC	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	236	49	59
	Fe₁Ni₄-HHTP NWAs	CC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	213	96	26
	Fe₂Ni-MIL-88B	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	222	42	65
	Fe_0.1-Ni-MOF/NF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	243 (at 50 mA∙cm⁻²)	70	67
	NiFe-MOF/FeCH-NF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	200	51	68
	NiFe-NFF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	250	39	66
	Fe_0.38Ni_0.62-MOF	CC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	190	58	22
	N-Fe-MOF NSs	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	221	56	70
	MFN-MOF (2:1)/NF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	235 (at 50 mA∙cm⁻²)	55	102
	Fe₂Ni-MIL-101	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	237 (at 20 mA∙cm⁻²)	44	103
	FeNi@CNF	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	356	63	104
NiFe-MOF derived oxides/hydroxides/carbonaceous materials	Fe-Ni-O_x	GC	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹	584	72	71
	NiFe₂O₄	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	293	98	72
	FeNi₃-Fe₃O₄ NPs/MOF-CNT	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	234	37	73
	FeNi@N-CNT	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	300	48	33
	Fe-Ni@NC-CNTs	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	274	45.5	75
	NiFe-NCs	CFP	1 mol∙L⁻¹	271	48	105
	Ni_0.5Fe_0.5-HP	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	280	79	106
	FeNi/NiFe₂O₄@NC	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	316	60	107
	NiFe@NC	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	360	60	108
NiFe-MOF derived phosphates/sulfides	Fe-Ni-P/rGO-400	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	240	63	77
	(Ni_xFe_1−x)₂P nanocubes	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	290	44	76
	Ni-Fe-O-P	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	227	50	78
	Ni-Fe-O-B	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	243	53	78
	Ni-Fe-O-S	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	272	70	78
NiCo-MOF	NiCo-UMOFNs	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	250	42	37
	CTGU-10c2	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	240	58	79
	AuNPs@CoNi-MOF	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	283	83	80
	M₂-(BDC)₂TED@CF	CF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	260	76	81
NiCo-MOF derived materials	Ni_xCo_3−xO₄/NF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	287	88	82
	NCMC	CFP	1 mol∙L⁻¹	290	73	83
	NiCo alloy@C/Ni_xCo_1−xO/NF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	300 (at 100 mA∙cm⁻²)	106	36
	Co_xNi_1−x@Co_yNi_1−yO@C	GC	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹		126	84
	CoNi₃C/Ni@C	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	325	68	85
	NiCo-0.8@N-CNFs-800	GC	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹	380	78	86
	Co₄Ni₁P NTs	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	245	61	87
	Ni_1.4Co_0.6P/NCNHMs		1 mol∙L⁻¹	320	54.5	88
	Ni_xCo_y-P	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	300 (at 35 mA∙cm⁻²)	71	38
	Ni₁Co₄S@C-1000	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹		64	89
	Ni-Co-S HPNA	CC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	270	56	90
	Co/Ni@C	GC	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹	410	101	109
	Ni-doped CoS₂/CFP	CFP	1 mol∙L⁻¹	270	79	110
Other bimetallic Ni-MOFs and their derivatives	NiCu-MOFNs/NF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	309 (at 100 mA∙cm⁻²)	48	92
	Ni/Ni₂P/Mo₂C@C	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	368	75	93
	Ni-Cu@Cu-Ni-MOF	CP	1 mol∙L⁻¹	640	98	61
	Pt-Ni@PCN920	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹		59	111
	UiO-66-NH₂-Ni@G	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	370	45	112
Trimetal Ni-MOF and their derivatives	Fe/Ni_2.4/Co_0.4-MIL-53	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	219		94
	Co_2.36Fe_0.19Ni_0.45-btca	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	292	73	95
	NiCo/Fe₃O₄/MOF-74	GC	1 mol∙L⁻¹	238	29	96
	FeCo_0.5Ni_0.5-LDH	Cu foil	1 mol∙L⁻¹	248	38	97
	NCF-MOF	NF	0.1 mol∙L⁻¹	480 (at 30 mA∙cm⁻²)	49	98
	Ni₃S₂@MIL-53(NiFeCo)/NF	NF	1 mol∙L⁻¹	236 (at 50 mA∙cm⁻²)	15	99

Table 3

参考文献 112

1	Li X. ; Yu J. ; Jaroniec M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45 (9), 2603. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00838G
2	Dresselhaus M. S. ; Thomas I. L. Nature 2001, 414 (6861), 332. doi: 10.1038/35104599
3	Chu S. ; Majumdar A. Nature 2012, 488 (7411), 294. doi: 10.1038/nature11475
4	Kibsgaard J. ; Chorkendorff I. Nat. Energy 2019, 4 (6), 430. doi: 10.1038/s41560-019-0407-1
5	McCrory C. C. L. ; Jung S. ; Peters J. C. ; Jaramillo T. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (45), 16977. doi: 10.1021/ja407115p
6	Dang S. ; Zhu Q. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3 (1), 17075. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.75
7	Chang J. ; Xiao Y. ; Luo Z. ; Ge J. ; Liu C. ; Xing W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32 (7), 1556.
	常进法; 肖瑶; 罗兆艳; 葛君杰; 刘长鹏; 邢巍. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32 (7), 1556. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201604291
8	Wang H. F. ; Chen L. ; Pang H. ; Kaskel S. ; Xu Q. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (5), 1414. doi: 10.1039/c9cs00906j
9	Zhu B. ; Liang Z. ; Xia D. ; Zou R. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 23, 757. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.022
10	Wang X. ; Li B. ; Wu Y. P. ; Tsamis A. ; Yu H. G. ; Liu S. ; Zhao J. ; Li Y. S. ; Li D. S. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59 (7), 4764. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00024
11	Dong Y. ; Oloman C. W. ; Gyenge E. L. ; Su J. ; Chen L. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (18), 9924. doi: 10.1039/d0nr02187c
12	Han L. ; Dong S. ; Wang E. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (42), 9266. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602270
13	Gao R. ; Yan D. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10 (11), 1. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900954
14	Wang L. ; Sun W. ; Liu C. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2019, 35 (7), 697.
	王露; 孙威; 刘超. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35 (7), 697. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201807071
15	Tang H. ; Zheng M. ; Hu Q. ; Chi Y. ; Xu B. ; Zhang S. ; Xue H. ; Pang H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (29), 13999. doi: 10.1039/c8ta03644f
16	Xuan C. ; Zhang J. ; Wang J. ; Wang D. Chem. Asian J. 2020, 15 (7), 958. doi: 10.1002/asia.20190172
17	Medford A. J. ; Vojvodic A. ; Hummelshøj J. S. ; Voss J. ; Abild-Pedersen F. ; Studt F. ; Bligaard T. ; Nilsson A. ; Nørskov J. K. J. Catal. 2015, 328, 36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.033
18	Man I. C. ; Su H. ; Calle-vallejo F. ; Hansen H. A. ; Martínez J. I. ; Inoglu N. G. ; Kitchin J. ; Jaramillo T. F. ; Nørskov J. K. ; Rossmeisl J. ChemCatChem 2011, 3 (7), 1159. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201000397
19	Bode H. ; Dehmelt K. ; Witte J. Electrochim. Acta 1966, 11 (8), 1079. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(66)80045-2
20	Huang J. ; Li Y. ; Zhang Y. ; Rao G. ; Wu C. ; Hu Y. ; Wang X. ; Lu R. ; Li Y. ; Xiong J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (48), 17458. doi: 10.1002/anie.201910716
21	Wan Z. ; Yang D. ; Chen J. ; Tian J. ; Isimjan T. T. ; Yang X. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2 (10), 6334. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.9b01330
22	Duan J. ; Chen S. ; Zhao C. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15341
23	Li Y. -F. ; Selloni A. ACS Catal. 2014, 4 (4), 1148. doi: 10.1021/cs401245q
24	Diaz-Morales O. ; Ledezma-Yanez I. ; Koper M. T. M. ; Calle-Vallejo F. ACS Catal. 2015, 5 (9), 5380. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01638
25	Li W. H. ; Lv J. ; Li Q. ; Xie J. ; Ogiwara N. ; Huang Y. ; Jiang H. ; Kitagawa H. ; Xu G. ; Wang Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (17), 10431. doi: 10.1039/c9ta02169h
26	Yeo B. S. ; Bell A. T. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116 (15), 8394. doi: 10.1021/jp3007415
27	Jiao Y. ; Zheng Y. ; Jaroniec M. ; Qiao S. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44 (8), 2060. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00470A
28	Suen N. ; Hung S. ; Quan Q. ; Zhang N. ; Xu Y. ; Chen H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (2), 337. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00328A
29	Dietzel P. D. C. ; Panella B. ; Hirscher M. ; Blom R. ; Fjellvåg H. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1 (9), 959. doi: 10.1039/b515434k
30	Palomino Cabello C. ; Gómez-Pozuelo G. ; Opanasenko M. ; Nachtigall P. ; Čejka J. ChemPlusChem 2016, 81 (8), 828. doi: 10.1002/cplu.201600168
31	Gao Z. ; Yu Z. W. ; Liu F. Q. ; Yu Y. ; Su X. M. ; Wang L. ; Xu Z. Z. ; Yang Y. L. ; Wu G. R. ; Feng X. F. ; et al Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58 (17), 11500. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b01301
32	Janiak C. ; Vieth J. K. New J. Chem. 2010, 34 (11), 2366. doi: 10.1039/c0nj00275e
33	Tao Z. ; Wang T. ; Wang X. ; Zheng J. ; Li X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (51), 35390. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b13411
34	Lin Y. ; Chen G. ; Wan H. ; Chen F. ; Liu X. ; Ma R. Small 2019, 15 (18), 1. doi: 10.1002/smll.201900348
35	Yaghi O. M. ; Li H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (41), 10401. doi: 10.1021/ja00146a033
36	Ping D. ; Feng X. ; Zhang J. ; Geng J. ; Dong X. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4 (12), 3037. doi: 10.1002/celc.201700901
37	Zhao S. ; Wang Y. ; Dong J. ; He C. -T. ; Yin H. ; An P. ; Zhao K. ; Zhang X. ; Gao C. ; Zhang L. ; et al Nat. Energy 2016, 1 (12), 16184. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.184
38	Shuai C. ; Mo Z. ; Niu X. ; Zhao P. ; Dong Q. ; Chen Y. ; Liu N. ; Guo R. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167 (2), 026512. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab6b10
39	Stock N. ; Biswas S. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112 (2), 933. doi: 10.1021/cr200304e
40	Braga D. ; Giaffreda S. L. ; Grepioni F. ; Pettersen A. ; Maini L. ; Curzi M. ; Polito M. Dalt. Trans. 2006, 10, 1249. doi: 10.1039/b516165g
41	Zhu D. ; Liu J. ; Wang L. ; Du Y. ; Zheng Y. ; Davey K. ; Qiao S. Z. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (8), 3599. doi: 10.1039/c8nr09680e
42	Xu Y. ; Tu W. ; Zhang B. ; Yin S. ; Huang Y. ; Kraft M. ; Xu R. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29 (11), 1. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605957
43	He P. ; Xie Y. ; Dou Y. ; Zhou J. ; Zhou A. ; Wei X. ; Li J. R. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (44), 41595. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b16224
44	Yan L. ; Jiang H. ; Xing Y. ; Wang Y. ; Liu D. ; Gu X. ; Dai P. ; Li L. ; Zhao X. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (4), 1682. doi: 10.1039/c7ta10218f
45	Zhang H. ; Su J. ; Zhao K. ; Chen L. ChemElectroChem 2020, 7 (8), 1805. doi: 10.1002/celc.202000136
46	Maruthapandian V. ; Kumaraguru S. ; Mohan S. ; Saraswathy V. ; Muralidharan S. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5 (19), 2795. doi: 10.1002/celc.201800802
47	Liu Q. ; Xie L. ; Shi X. ; Du G. ; Asiri A. M. ; Luo Y. ; Sun X. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5 (7), 1570. doi: 10.1039/C7QI00808B
48	Guo C. ; Jiao Y. ; Zheng Y. ; Luo J. ; Davey K. ; Qiao S. Z. Chem 2019, 5 (9), 2429. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.06.016
49	Hu Q. ; Huang X. ; Wang Z. ; Li G. ; Han Z. ; Yang H. ; Ren X. ; Zhang Q. ; Liu J. ; He C. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8 (4), 2140. doi: 10.1039/c9ta12713e
50	Li X. ; Fan M. ; Wei D. ; Wang X. ; Wang Y. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167 (2), 024501. doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ab61eb
51	Sun H. ; Lian Y. ; Yang C. ; Xiong L. ; Qi P. ; Mu Q. ; Zhao X. ; Guo J. ; Deng Z. ; Peng Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11 (9), 2363. doi: 10.1039/c8ee00934a
52	Guo Y. ; Zhou Y. ; Nan Y. ; Li B. ; Song X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12 (11), 12743. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b20532
53	Yu X. Y. ; Feng Y. ; Guan B. ; Lou X. W. D. ; Paik U. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9 (4), 1246. doi: 10.1039/c6ee00100a
54	Jayaramulu K. ; Masa J. ; Tomanec O. ; Peeters D. ; Ranc V. ; Schneemann A. ; Zboril R. ; Schuhmann W. ; Fischer R. A. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27 (33), 1. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201700451
55	Yang L. ; Gao M. ; Dai B. ; Guo X. ; Liu Z. ; Peng B. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 191, 813. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.160
56	Xing J. ; Guo K. ; Zou Z. ; Cai M. ; Du J. ; Xu C. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54 (51), 7046. doi: 10.1039/c8cc03112f
57	Zheng F. ; Xiang D. ; Li P. ; Zhang Z. ; Du C. ; Zhuang Z. ; Li X. ; Chen W. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7 (11), 9743. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01131
58	Abednatanzi S. ; Gohari Derakhshandeh P. ; Depauw H. ; Coudert F. -X. ; Vrielinck H. ; Van Der Voort P. ; Leus K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48 (9), 2535. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00337H
59	Zheng F. ; Zhang Z. ; Xiang D. ; Li P. ; Du C. ; Zhuang Z. ; Li X. ; Chen W. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 541. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.005
60	Wang L. J. ; Deng H. ; Furukawa H. ; Gándara F. ; Cordova K. E. ; Peri D. ; Yaghi O. M. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53 (12), 5881. doi: 10.1021/ic500434a
61	Ma J. ; Lu B. ; Wang S. ; He W. ; Bai X. ; Wang T. ; Zhang X. ; Li Y. ; Zhang L. ; Chen J. ; et al New J. Chem. 2020, 44 (6), 2459. doi: 10.1039/c9nj05562b
62	Mohammed-Ibrahim J. J. Power Sources 2020, 448, 227375. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227375
63	Zhang W. ; Li D. ; Zhang L. ; She X. ; Yang D. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 39, 39. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.01.017
64	Li C. ; Liu Y. ; Wang G. ; Guan L. ; Lin Y. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7 (8), 7496. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00264
65	Ling X. ; Du F. ; Zhang Y. ; Shen Y. ; Li T. ; Alsaedi A. ; Hayat T. ; Zhou Y. ; Zou Z. RSC Adv. 2019, 9 (57), 33558. doi: 10.1039/c9ra07499f
66	Cao C. ; Ma D. D. ; Xu Q. ; Wu X. T. ; Zhu Q. L. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29 (6), 1. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807418
67	Yang L. ; Zhu G. ; Wen H. ; Guan X. ; Sun X. ; Feng H. ; Tian W. ; Zheng D. ; Cheng X. ; Yao Y. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (15), 8771. doi: 10.1039/c9ta00819e
68	Du J. ; Xu S. ; Sun L. ; Li F. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55 (98), 14773. doi: 10.1039/c9cc07433c
69	Huang J. ; Li Y. ; Huang R. -K. ; He C. -T. ; Gong L. ; Hu Q. ; Wang L. ; Xu Y. -T. ; Tian X. -Y. ; Liu S. -Y. ; et al Angew. Chem. 2018, 130 (17), 4722. doi: 10.1002/ange.201801029
70	Li F. L. ; Wang P. ; Huang X. ; Young D. J. ; Wang H. F. ; Braunstein P. ; Lang J. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (21), 7051. doi: 10.1002/anie.201902588
71	Jiang J. ; Zhang C. ; Ai L. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 208, 17. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.008
72	Fang Z. ; Hao Z. ; Dong Q. ; Cui Y. J. Nanopart. Res. 2018, 20 (4), 106. doi: 10.1007/s11051-018-4209-3
73	Srinivas K. ; Lu Y. ; Chen Y. ; Zhang W. ; Yang D. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8 (9), 3820. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07182
74	Flahaut E. ; Govindaraj A. ; Peigney A. ; Laurent C. ; Rousset A. ; Rao C. N. R. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 300 (1), 236. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)01304-9
75	Zhao X. ; Pachfule P. ; Li S. ; Simke J. R. J. ; Schmidt J. ; Thomas A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (29), 8921. doi: 10.1002/anie.201803136
76	Zou H. H. ; Yuan C. Z. ; Zou H. Y. ; Cheang T. Y. ; Zhao S. J. ; Qazi U. Y. ; Zhong S. L. ; Wang L. ; Xu A. W. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7 (7), 1549. doi: 10.1039/c7cy00035a
77	Fang X. ; Jiao L. ; Zhang R. ; Jiang H. L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (28), 23852. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b07142
78	Xuan C. ; Wang J. ; Xia W. ; Zhu J. ; Peng Z. ; Xia K. ; Xiao W. ; Xin H. L. ; Wang D. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (16), 7062. doi: 10.1039/c8ta00410b
79	Zhou W. ; Huang D. D. ; Wu Y. P. ; Zhao J. ; Wu T. ; Zhang J. ; Li D. S. ; Sun C. ; Feng P. ; Bu X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (13), 4227. doi: 10.1002/anie.201813634
80	Hu W. C. ; Shi Y. ; Zhou Y. ; Weng C. ; Younis M. R. ; Pang J. ; Wang C. ; Xia X. H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (17), 10601. doi: 10.1039/c9ta00847k
81	Li D. J. ; Li Q. H. ; Gu Z. G. ; Zhang J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (31), 18519. doi: 10.1039/c9ta04554f
82	Shen Y. ; Guo S. G. ; Du F. ; Yuan X. B. ; Zhang Y. ; Hu J. ; Shen Q. ; Luo W. ; Alsaedi A. ; Hayat T. ; et al Nanoscale 2019, 11 (24), 11765. doi: 10.1039/c9nr01804b
83	Wei X. ; Zhang Y. ; He H. ; Gao D. ; Hu J. ; Peng H. ; Peng L. ; Xiao S. ; Xiao P. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55 (46), 6515. doi: 10.1039/c9cc02037c
84	Sun D. ; Ye L. ; Sun F. ; García H. ; Li Z. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56 (9), 5203. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00333
85	Jia X. ; Wang M. ; Liu G. ; Wang Y. ; Yang J. ; Li J. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2019, 44 (45), 24572. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.144
86	Feng C. ; Guo Y. ; Xie Y. ; Cao X. ; Li S. ; Zhang L. ; Wang W. ; Wang J. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (10), 5942. doi: 10.1039/c9nr10943a
87	Yan L. ; Cao L. ; Dai P. ; Gu X. ; Liu D. ; Li L. ; Wang Y. ; Zhao X. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27 (40), 1. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201703455
88	Fan S. ; Zhang J. ; Wu Q. ; Huang S. ; Zheng J. ; Kong D. ; Chen S. ; Wang Y. ; Ang L. K. ; Shi Y. ; et al J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11 (10), 3911. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00851
89	Chen B. ; Ma G. ; Zhu Y. ; Wang J. ; Xiong W. ; Xia Y. J. Power Sources 2016, 334, 112. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.022
90	Chen W. ; Zhang Y. ; Chen G. ; Huang R. ; Wu Y. ; Zhou Y. ; Hu Y. ; Ostrikov K. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 560, 426. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.099
91	Ma X. ; Qi K. ; Wei S. ; Zhang L. ; Cui X. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 770, 236. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.096
92	Zheng X. ; Song X. ; Wang X. ; Zhang Z. ; Sun Z. ; Guo Y. New J. Chem. 2018, 42 (11), 8346. doi: 10.1039/c8nj01035h
93	Li X. ; Wang X. ; Zhou J. ; Han L. ; Sun C. ; Wang Q. ; Su Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6 (14), 5789. doi: 10.1039/c7ta10558d
94	Li F. L. ; Shao Q. ; Huang X. ; Lang J. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (7), 1888. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711376
95	Yuan J. T. ; Hou J. J. ; Liu X. L. ; Feng Y. R. ; Zhang X. M. Dalt. Trans. 2020, 49 (3), 750. doi: 10.1039/c9dt04295d
96	Wang X. ; Xiao H. ; Li A. ; Li Z. ; Liu S. ; Zhang Q. ; Gong Y. ; Zheng L. ; Zhu Y. ; Chen C. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (45), 15336. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b08744
97	Zhang W. Da ; Yu H. ; Li T. ; Hu Q. T. ; Gong Y. ; Zhang D. Y. ; Liu Y. ; Fu Q. T. ; Zhu H. Y. ; et al Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 264, 118532. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118532
98	Ahn W. ; Park M. G. ; Lee D. U. ; Seo M. H. ; Jiang G. ; Cano Z. P. ; Hassan F. M. ; Chen Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28 (28), 1. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201802129
99	Yuan B. ; Li C. ; Guan L. ; Li K. ; Lin Y. J. Power Sources 2020, 451, 227295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227295
100	Xie A. ; Du J. ; Tao F. ; Tao Y. ; Xiong Z. ; Luo S. ; Li X. ; Yao C. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 305, 338. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.073
101	Xie A. ; Zhang J. ; Tao X. ; Zhang J. ; Wei B. ; Peng W. ; Tao Y. ; Luo S. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 324, 134814. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134814
102	Senthil Raja D. ; Lin H. W. ; Lu S. Y. Nano Energy 2019, 57, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.018
103	Wang Q. ; Wei C. ; Li D. ; Guo W. ; Zhong D. ; Zhao Q. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 286, 92. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.05.040
104	Li Y. ; Lu M. ; He P. ; Wu Y. ; Wang J. ; Chen D. ; Xu H. ; Gao J. ; Yao J. Chem. Asian J. 2019, 14 (9), 1590. doi: 10.1002/asia.201900328
105	Kumar A. ; Bhattacharyya S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (48), 41906. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b14096
106	Qiao H. ; Yang Y. ; Dai X. ; Zhao H. ; Yong J. ; Yu L. ; Luan X. ; Cui M. ; Zhang X. ; Huang X. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 318, 430. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.084
107	Ma Y. ; Dai X. ; Liu M. ; Yong J. ; Qiao H. ; Jin A. ; Li Z. ; Huang X. ; Wang H. ; Zhang X. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (50), 34396. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b11821
108	Du L. ; Luo L. ; Feng Z. ; Engelhard M. ; Xie X. ; Han B. ; Sun J. ; Zhang J. ; Yin G. ; Wang C. ; et al Nano Energy 2017, 39, 245. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.006
109	Abdelkader-Fernández V. K. ; Fernandes D. M. ; Balula S. S. ; Cunha-Silva L. ; Pérez-Mendoza M. J. ; López-Garzón F. J. ; Pereira M. F. ; Freire C. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2 (3), 1854. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b02010
110	Xie Z. ; Tang H. ; Wang Y. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6 (4), 1206. doi: 10.1002/celc.201801106
111	Nadeem M. ; Yasin G. ; Bhatti M. H. ; Mehmood M. ; Arif M. ; Dai L. J. Power Sources 2018, 402, 34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.006
112	Hassan M. H. ; Soliman A. B. ; Elmehelmey W. A. ; Abugable A. A. ; Karakalos S. G. ; Elbahri M. ; Hassanien A. ; Alkordi M. H. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55 (1), 31. doi: 10.1039/c8cc07120a

Acidic electrolyte	Alkaline electrolyte
* + H₂O → OH* + H⁺ + e⁻	* + OH⁻ → OH* + e⁻
OH* → O* + H⁺ + e⁻	OH* + OH⁻ → O* + H₂O + e⁻
O* + H₂O → OOH* + H⁺ + e⁻	O* + OH⁻ → OOH* + e⁻
OOH* → O₂ + H⁺ + e⁻ + *	OOH+ OH⁻ → O₂ + H₂O + e⁻ +

[1]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[2]	段欣漩, Sendeku Marshet Getaye, 张道明, 周道金, 徐立军, 高学庆, 陈爱兵, 邝允, 孙晓明. 钨掺杂镍铁水滑石高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303055 - .
[3]	王宁, 李一, 崔乾, 孙晓玥, 胡悦, 罗运军, 杜然. 金属气凝胶：可控制备与应用展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212014 -0 .
[4]	胡荣, 韦丽云, 鲜靖林, 房光钰, 吴植傲, 樊淼, 郭家越, 李青翔, 刘凯思, 姜会钰, 徐卫林, 万骏, 姚永刚. 微波热冲快速制备二维多孔La_0.2Sr_0.8CoO₃钙钛矿用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212025 -0 .
[5]	夏伟锋, 季成宇, 王锐, 裘式纶, 方千荣. 基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212057 -0 .
[6]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[7]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[8]	杨帅, 徐瑜歆, 郝子坤, 秦胜建, 张润鹏, 韩钰, 杜利伟, 朱紫洢, 杜安宁, 陈欣, 吴昊, 乔冰冰, 李坚, 王艺, 孙昺晨, 闫融融, 赵晋津. 高效医学传感钙钛矿材料研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211025 -0 .
[9]	荣佑文, 桑佳琪, 车丽, 高敦峰, 汪国雄. 二氧化碳电催化还原中的电解质效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212027 -0 .
[10]	许义飞, 杨瀚文, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 电催化动力学简介[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2210025 -0 .
[11]	王奥琦, 陈军, 张鹏飞, 唐珊, 冯兆池, 姚婷婷, 李灿. NiMo(O)物相结构与电解水析氢反应活性的关联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2301023 -0 .
[12]	胡洋, 刘斌, 徐路遥, 董自强, 仵亚婷, 刘杰, 钟澄, 胡文彬. 基于微流控技术平台的Pt基三元电催化剂高通量合成和筛选[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209004 -0 .
[13]	徐斯然, 吴奇, 卢帮安, 唐堂, 张佳楠, 胡劲松. “绿氢”工业化碱性催化剂研究现状及未来展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2209001 -0 .
[14]	尉瑞芳, 李东峰, 尹恒, 王秀丽, 李灿. 微秒时间分辨的工况电化学紫外可见吸收光谱测量系统[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207035 -0 .
[15]	韦天然, 张书胜, 刘倩, 邱园, 罗俊, 刘熙俊. 富氧空位的非晶氧化铜高选择性电催化还原CO₂制乙烯[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2207026 -0 .

镍基金属有机框架及其衍生物在电催化析氧反应中的研究进展

Research Progress of Nickel-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks and Their Derivatives for Oxygen Evolution Catalysis

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 17

参考文献 112

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0