导电金属有机框架材料在电催化中的成就，挑战和机遇

doi:10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010025

物理化学学报 >> 2021, Vol. 37 >> Issue (7): 2010025.doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010025

所属专题：电催化

导电金属有机框架材料在电催化中的成就，挑战和机遇

高增强¹, 王聪勇²^,³, 李俊俊¹, 朱亚廷¹, 张志成¹^,*(), 胡文平¹^,²^,*()

¹ 天津市分子光电科学重点实验室，天津大学理学院化学系，天津化学化工协同创新中心，天津 300072
² 天津大学-新加坡国立大学福州联合学院，天津大学福州国际校区，滨海新城，福州 350207
³ 化学系，理学院，新加坡国立大学，新加坡 117543

收稿日期:2020-10-13 录用日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-11-30
通讯作者: 张志成,胡文平 E-mail:zczhang19@tju.edu.cn;huwp@tju.edu.cn
作者简介:Zhicheng Zhang is a Professor in the Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Tianjin University. He received his Ph.D. degree from the College of Chemical Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) in 2012. Then, he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University. Since 2014, he worked as a Research Fellow in the School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. In 2019, he joined Tianjin University as a Full Professor. His research interests include the design and synthesis of functional nanomaterials and their applications in energy conversion, catalysis, and organic optoelectronics
Wenping Hu is a Professor at Tianjin University and a Cheung Kong Professor of the Ministry of Education, China. He received his Ph.D. from ICCAS in 1999. Then, he joined Osaka University and Stuttgart University as a Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Sciences and an Alexander von Humboldt fellow, respectively. In 2003, he worked with Nippon Telephone and Telegraph and then joined ICCAS as a Full Professor. He worked for Tianjin University in 2013. His research focuses on organic optoelectronics第一联系人：
^†These authors contributed equally to this work.
基金资助:
the National Key R & D Program(2017YFA0204503);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(22071172);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(91833306);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(21875158);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51633006);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51733004)

Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalysis:Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities

Zengqiang Gao¹, Congyong Wang²^,³, Junjun Li¹, Yating Zhu¹, Zhicheng Zhang¹^,*(), Wenping Hu¹^,²^,*()

¹ Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Optoelectronic Sciences, Department of Chemistry, School of Science, Tianjin University & Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin 300072, China
² Joint School of National University of Singapore and Tianjin University, International Campus of Tianjin University, Binhai New City, Fuzhou 350207, China
³ Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore

Received:2020-10-13 Accepted:2020-11-25 Published:2020-11-30
Contact: Zhicheng Zhang,Wenping Hu E-mail:zczhang19@tju.edu.cn;huwp@tju.edu.cn
About author:Email: huwp@tju.edu.cn (W.H.); Tel: +86-22-83613363 (Z.Z.)
Email: zczhang19@tju.edu.cn (Z.Z.)
Supported by:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFA0204503);国家自然科学基金(22071172);国家自然科学基金(91833306);国家自然科学基金(21875158);国家自然科学基金(51633006);国家自然科学基金(51733004)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

开发用于各种能量转化过程的新型催化剂对于满足绿色和可持续能源的需求至关重要。由于其具有可调节的晶体结构，显著的化学和物理性质以及稳定性，金属有机骨架(MOFs)已经广泛应用于电化学能量转换领域，比如CO₂还原反应、N₂还原反应、析氧反应、析氢反应和氧还原反应。更重要的是，MOFs具有可调节的化学环境、孔径和孔隙率，这些性质将促进反应物在多孔网络中的扩散，从而改善其电催化性能。但是，由于高的电荷转移能垒和受限的自由载流子，大多数MOFs展示了差的导电性，阻碍了其多样化应用。在先前的报道中，MOFs常被用作多孔基质来限制纳米颗粒生长或经退火处理作为共掺杂电催化剂。而导电MOFs不仅结合了传统MOFs的优点，还具有电子导电性和高电催化活性，使其无需退火处理就可以通过电子或离子途径实现导电，从而极大提高了电催化性能，这有助于拓宽其在电化学能源领域或其他方面的潜在应用。在一些催化反应中，导电MOFs的催化活性甚至超过了商业化的RuO₂催化剂或Pt基催化剂。本文主要总结了构建导电MOFs的机制，并概述了其合成方法，如水/溶剂热合成和界面辅助合成。此外，本文阐述了导电MOFs在电催化应用中的最新研究进展。值得一提的是，导电MOFs的形态和结构可改变底物与MOFs之间的界面接触，从而影响其催化性能，需要进一步深入研究。基于系统的合成策略，在未来可以根据各种电催化反应的需求设计合成更多的导电MOFs。高性能的导电MOF基催化剂将有望获得突破。

关键词: 导电金属有机框架, 电催化, 二氧化碳还原反应, 氮还原反应, 析氧反应, 析氢反应, 氧还原反应

Abstract:

To fulfill the demands of green and sustainable energy, the production of novel catalysts for different energy conversion processes is critical. Owing to the intriguing advantages of the intrinsic active species, tunable crystal structure, remarkable chemical and physical properties, and good stability, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been extensively investigated in various electrochemical energy conversions, such as the CO₂ reduction reaction, N₂ reduction reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, and oxygen reduction reaction. More importantly, it is feasible to change the chemical environments, pore sizes, and porosity of MOFs, which will theoretically facilitate the diffusion of reactants across the open porous networks, thereby improving the electrocatalytic performance. However, owing to the high energy barriers of charge transfer and limited free charge carriers, most MOFs show poor electrical conductivity, thus limiting their diverse applications. As reported previously, MOFs were used as a porous substrate to confine the growth of nanoparticles or co-doped electrocatalysts after annealing. The conductive MOFs can combine the advantages of conventional MOFs with electronic conductivity, which significantly enhance the electrocatalytic performance. In addition, conductive MOFs can achieve conductivity via electronic or ionic routes without post-annealing treatment, thereby extending their potential applications. Different synthesis strategies have recently been developed to endow MOFs with electrical conductivity, such as post-synthesis modification, guest molecule introduction, and composite formatting. The performance of conductive MOFs can even outperform those of commercial RuO₂ catalysts or Pt-group catalysts. However, it is difficult to endow most MOFs with high conductivity. This review summarizes the mechanisms of constructing conductive MOFs, such as redox hopping, through-bond pathways, through-space pathways, extended conjugation, and guest-promoted transport. Synthetic methods, including hydro/solvothermal synthesis and interface-assisted synthesis, are introduced. Recent advances in the use of conductive MOFs as heterogeneous catalysts in electrocatalysis have been comprehensively elucidated. It has been reported that conductive MOFs can demonstrate considerable catalytic activity, selectivity, and stability in different electrochemical reactions, revealing the immense potential for future displacement of Pt-group catalysts. Finally, the challenges and opportunities of conductive MOFs in electrocatalysis are discussed. Based on systematic synthesis strategies, more conductive MOFs can be constructed for electrocatalytic reactions. In addition, the morphology and structure of conductive MOFs, which can change the electrochemical accessibility between substrates and MOFs, are also crucial for catalysis, and thus, they should be extensively studied in the future. It is believed that a breakthrough for high-performance conductive MOF-based electrocatalysts could be achieved.

Key words: Conductive metal-organic frameworks, Electrocatalysis, CO2 reduction reaction, N2 reduction reaction, Oxygen evolution reaction, Hydrogen evolution reaction, Oxygen reduction reaction

高增强, 王聪勇, 李俊俊, 朱亚廷, 张志成, 胡文平. 导电金属有机框架材料在电催化中的成就，挑战和机遇[J]. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37(7), 2010025. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010025

Zengqiang Gao, Congyong Wang, Junjun Li, Yating Zhu, Zhicheng Zhang, Wenping Hu. Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalysis:Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities[J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37(7), 2010025. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010025

链接本文: https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010025

https://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V37/I7/2010025

图/表 11

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Fig 8

Fig 9

Fig 10

Table 1

参考文献 121

1	Li H. ; Eddaoudi M. ; O'Keeffe M. ; Yaghi O. M. Nature 1999, 402, 276. doi: 10.1038/46248
2	Tranchemontagne D. J. ; Mendoza-Cortés J. L. ; O'Keeffe M. ; Yaghi O. M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1257. doi: 10.1039/B817735J
3	Zhang Z. ; Chen Y. ; Xu X. ; Zhang J. ; Xiang G. ; He W. ; Wang X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 429. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308589
4	Zhou H.-C. ; Long J. R. ; Yaghi O. M. Chem. Rev 2012, 112, 673. doi: 10.1021/cr300014x
5	Furukawa H. ; Cordova K. E. ; O'Keeffe M. ; Yaghi O. M. Science 2013, 341, 1230444. doi: 10.1126/science.1230444
6	Chen X.-H. ; Wei Q. ; Hong J.-D. ; Xu R. ; Zhou T.-H. Rare Met. 2019, 38, 413. doi: 10.1007/s12598-019-01259-6
7	Bavykina A. ; Kolobov N. ; Khan I. S. ; Bau J. A. ; Ramirez A. ; Gascon J. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 8468. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00685
8	Wang Y. ; Li Q. ; Shi W. ; Cheng P. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 1768. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.010
9	Zhang K. ; Liang Z. ; Zou R. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 7. doi: 10.1007/s11426-019-9613-1
10	Song Z. ; Zhang L. ; Doyle-Davis K. ; Fu X. ; Luo J.-L. ; Sun X. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2001561. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202001561
11	Zhao M. ; Huang Y. ; Peng Y. ; Huang Z. ; Ma Q. ; Zhang H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6267. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00268A
12	Liu J. ; Wöll C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 5730. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00315C
13	Li B. ; Wen H.-M. ; Cui Y. ; Zhou W. ; Qian G. ; Chen B. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8819. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601133
14	Ding M. ; Flaig R. W. ; Jiang H.-L. ; Yaghi O. M. Chem. Soc. Rev 2019, 48, 2783. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00829A
15	Li J.-R. ; Sculley J. ; Zhou H.-C. Chem. Rev 2012, 112, 869. doi: 10.1021/cr200190s
16	Zhang Z. ; Chen Y. ; He S. ; Zhang J. ; Xu X. ; Yang Y. ; Nosheen F. ; Saleem F. ; He W. ; Wang X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 12517. doi: 10.1002/anie.201406484
17	Dhakshinamoorthy A. ; Asiri A. M. ; Garcia H. Adv. Mater 2019, 31, 1900617. doi: 10.1002/adma.201900617
18	Sun L. ; Campbell M. G. ; Dincă M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 3566. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506219
19	Talin A. A. ; Centrone A. ; Ford A. C. ; Foster M. E. ; Stavila V. ; Haney P. ; Kinney R. A. ; Szalai V. ; El Gabaly F. ; Yoon H.P. ;et al Science 2014, 343, 66. doi: 10.1126/science.1246738
20	Li W.-H. ; Deng W.-H. ; Wang G.-E. ; Xu G. Energy Chem. 2020, 2, 100029. doi: 10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100029
21	Li W. H. ; Ding K. ; Tian H. R. ; Yao M.-S. ; Nath B. ; Deng W.-H. ; Wang Y. ; Xu G. Adv. Funct. Mater 2017, 27, 1702067. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201702067
22	Ko M. ; Mendecki L. ; Mirica K. A. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 7873. doi: 10.1039/C8CC02871K
23	Li P. ; Wang B. Isr. J. Chem. 2018, 58, 1010. doi: 10.1002/ijch.201800078
24	Stavila V. ; Talin A. A. ; Allendorf M. D. Chem. Soc. Rev 2014, 43, 5994. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00096J
25	Bhardwaj S. K. ; Bhardwaj N. ; Kaur R. ; Mehta J. ; Sharma A. L. ; Kim K.-H. ; Deep A. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 14992. doi: 10.1039/C8TA04220A
26	Clough A. J. ; Yoo J. W. ; Mecklenburg M. H. ; Marinescu S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 118. doi: 10.1021/ja5116937
27	Miner E. M. ; Fukushima T. ; Sheberla D. ; Sun L. ; Surendranath Y. ; Dincă M. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10942. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10942
28	Miner E. M. ; Wang L. ; Dincă M. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6286. doi: 10.1039/C8SC02049C
29	Cheng W.-Z. ; Liang J.-L. ; Yin H.-B. ; Wang Y.-J. ; Yan W.-F. ; Zhang J.-N. Rare Met. 2020, 39, 815. doi: 10.1007/s12598-020-01440-2
30	Liu X. ; Yue T. ; Qi K. ; Qiu Y. ; Xia B. Y. ; Guo X. Chin. Chem. Lett 2020, 31, 2189. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.12.009
31	Zhao R. ; Liang Z. ; Zou R. ; Xu Q. Joule 2018, 2, 2235. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.019
32	Shinde S. S. ; Lee C. H. ; Jung J.-Y. ; Wagh N. K. ; Kim S.-H. ; Kim D.-H. ; Lin C. ; Lee S. U. ; Lee J.-H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 727. doi: 10.1039/C8EE02679C
33	Liu J. ; Song X. ; Zhang T. ; Liu S. ; Wen H. ; Chen L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2. doi: 10.1002/anie.202006102
34	Sheberla D. ; Bachman J. C. ; Elias J. S. ; Sun C.-J. ; Shao-Horn Y. ; Dincă M. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 220. doi: 10.1038/nmat4766
35	Du W. ; Bai Y.-L. ; Yang Z. ; Li R. ; Zhang D. ; Ma Z. ; Yuan A. ; Xu J. Chin. Chem. Lett 2020, 31, 2309. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.017
36	Campbell M. G. ; Sheberla D. ; Liu S. F. ; Swager T. M. ; Dincă M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 4349. doi: 10.1002/anie.201411854
37	Campbell M. G. ; Liu S. F. ; Swager T. M. ; Dincă M. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 13780. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09600
38	Aubrey M. L. ; Kapelewski M. T. ; Melville J. F. ; Oktawiec J. ; Presti D. ; Gagliardi L. ; Long J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 5005. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00654
39	Meng Z. ; Aykanat A. ; Mirica K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 2046. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b11257
40	Wu G. ; Huang J. ; Zang Y. ; He J. ; Xu G. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 1360. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08511
41	Huang X. ; Sheng P. ; Tu Z. ; Zhang F. ; Wang J. ; Geng H. ; Zou Y. ; Di C.-A. ; Yi Y. ; Sun Y. ; Xu W. ; Zhu D. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7408. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8408
42	Lahiri N. ; Lotfizadeh N. ; Tsuchikawa R. ; Deshpande V. V. ; Louie J. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 19. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09889
43	Wang B. ; Luo Y. ; Liu B. ; Duan G. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 35935. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b14319
44	Song X. ; Wang X. ; Li Y. ; Zheng C. ; Zhang B. ; Di C.-A. ; Li F. ; Jin C. ; Mi W. ; Chen L. ; Hu W. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 1118. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911543
45	Zhao W. ; Peng J. ; Wang W. ; Liu S. ; Zhao Q. ; Huang W. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2018, 377, 44. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.08.023
46	Dong R. ; Zhang Z. ; Tranca D.C. ; Zhou S. ; Wang M. ; Adler P. ; Liao Z. ; Liu F. ; Sun Y. ; Shi W. ;et al Nat. Commun 2018, 9, 2637. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05141-4
47	Yang C. ; Dong R. ; Wang M. ; Petkov P. S. ; Zhang Z. ; Wang M. ; Han P. ; Ballabio M. ; Bräuninger S.A. ; Liao Z. ;et al Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3260. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11267-w
48	Qiu T. ; Liang Z. ; Guo W. ; Tabassum H. ; Gao S. ; Zou R. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 520. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02625
49	Chu S. ; Majumdar A. Nature 2012, 488, 294. doi: 10.1038/nature11475
50	Liu J. ; Zhu D. ; Guo C. ; Vasileff A. ; Qiao S.-Z. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700518. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700518
51	Wang H.-F. ; Chen L. ; Pang H. ; Kaskel S. ; Xu Q. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 1414. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00906J
52	Xie L. ; Skorupskii G. ; Dincă M. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8536. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00766
53	Sheberla D. ; Sun L. ; Blood-Forsythe M. A. ; Er S. ; Wade C. R. ; Brozek C. K. ; Aspuru-Guzik A. ; Dincă M. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 8859. doi: 10.1021/ja502765n
54	Narayan T. C. ; Miyakai T. ; Seki S. ; Dincă M. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 12932. doi: 10.1021/ja3059827
55	Park S. S. ; Hontz E. R. ; Sun L. ; Hendon C. H. ; Walsh A. ; Van Voorhis T. ; Dincă M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1774. doi: 10.1021/ja512437u
56	Xie L. S. ; Alexandrov E. V. ; Skorupskii G. ; Proserpio D. M. ; Dincă M. Chem. Sci 2019, 10, 8558. doi: 10.1039/C9SC03348C
57	Pathak A. ; Shen J.-W. ; Usman M. ; Wei L.-F. ; Mendiratta S. ; Chang Y.-S. ; Sainbileg B. ; Ngue C.-M ; Chen R.-S. ; Hayashi M. ;et al Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1721. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09682-0
58	Xie L. ; Skorupskii G. ; Dincă M. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 8536. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00766
59	Makiura R. ; Motoyama S. ; Umemura Y. ; Yamanaka H. ; Sakata O. ; Kitagawa H. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 565. doi: 10.1038/nmat2769
60	Dong R. ; Pfeffermann M. ; Liang H. ; Zheng Z. ; Zhu X. ; Zhang J. ; Feng X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 12058. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506048
61	Kambe T. ; Sakamoto R. ; Hoshiko K. ; Takada K. ; Miyachi M. ; Ryu J.-H. ; Sasaki S. ; Kim J. ; Nakazato K. ; Takata M. ;et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2462. doi: 10.1021/ja312380b
62	Pal T. ; Kambe T. ; Kusamoto T. ; Foo M. L. ; Matsuoka R. ; Sakamoto R. ; Nishihara H. ChemPlusChem 2015, 80, 1255. doi: 10.1002/cplu.201500206
63	Sun X. ; Wu K.-H. ; Sakamoto R. ; Kusamoto T. ; Maeda H. ; Ni X. ; Jiang W. ; Liu F. ; Sasaki S. ; Masunaga H. ;et al Chem. Sci 2017, 8, 8078. doi: 10.1039/C7SC02688A
64	Pal T. ; Doi S. ; Maeda H. ; Wada K. ; Tan C. M. ; Fukui N. ; Sakamoto R. ; Tsuneyuki S. ; Sasaki S. ; Nishihara H. Chem. Sci 2019, 10, 5218. doi: 10.1039/C9SC01144G
65	Huang X. ; Li H. ; Tu Z. ; Liu L. ; Wu X. ; Chen J. ; Liang Y. ; Zou Y. ; Yi Y. ; Sun J. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 15153. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07921
66	Sheberla D. ; Bachman J. C. ; Elias J. S. ; Sun C.-J. ; Shao-Horn Y. ; Dincă M. Nat. Mater 2017, 16, 220. doi: 10.1038/nmat4766
67	Du W. ; Bai Y.-L. ; Yang Z. ; Li R. ; Zhang D. ; Ma Z. ; Yuan A. ; Xu J. Chin. Chem. Lett 2020, 31, 2309. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.04.017
68	Campbell M. G. ; Sheberla D. ; Liu S. F. ; Swager T. M. ; Dincă M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 4349. doi: 10.1002/anie.201411854
69	Campbell M. G. ; Liu S. F. ; Swager T. M. ; Dincă M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13780. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09600
70	Dunwell M. ; Lu Q. ; Heyes J. M. ; Rosen J. ; Chen J. G. ; Yan Y. ; Jiao F. ; Xu B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3774. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b13287
71	Zhao C. ; Dai X. ; Yao T. ; Chen W. ; Wang X. ; Wang J. ; Yang J. ; Wei S. ; Wu Y. ; Li Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 8078. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b02736
72	Lu Y. ; Zhang J. ; Wei W. ; Ma D. D. ; Wu X. T. ; Zhu Q. L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 37986. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c06537
73	Li X. ; Zhu Q. L. EnergyChem 2020, 2, 100033. doi: 10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100033
74	Ma D. D. ; Zhu Q. L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 422, 213483. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213483
75	Aubrey M. L. ; Kapelewski M. T. ; Melville J. F. ; Oktawiec J. ; Presti D. ; Gagliardi L. ; Long J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5005. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00654
76	Meng Z. ; Aykanat A. ; Mirica K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2046. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b11257
77	Hod I. ; Sampson M. D. ; Deria P. ; Kubiak C. P. ; Farha O. K. ; Hupp J. T. ACS Catal 2015, 5, 6302. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01767
78	Albo J. ; Vallejo D. ; Beobide G. ; Castillo O. ; Castaño P. ; Irabien A. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1100. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600693
79	Dong B.-X. ; Qian S.-L. ; Bu F.-Y. ; Wu Y.-C. ; Feng L.-G. ; Teng Y.-L. ; Liu W.-L. ; Li Z.-W. ACS Appl. Energy Mater 2018, 1, 4662. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00797
80	Perfecto-Irigaray M. ; Albo J. ; Beobide G. ; Castillo O. ; Irabien A. ; Pérez-Yáñez S. RSC Adv 2018, 8, 21092. doi: 10.1039/C8RA02676A
81	Qiu Y.-L. ; Zhong H.-X. ; Zhang T.-T. ; Xu W.-B. ; Su P.-P. ; Li X.-F. ; Zhang H.-M. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2480. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b15255
82	Kornienko N. ; Zhao Y. ; Kley C. S. ; Zhu C. ; Kim D. ; Lin S. ; Chang C. J. ; Yaghi O. M. ; Yang P. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 14129. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08212
83	Guntern Y. T. ; Pankhurst J. R. ; Vávra J. ; Mensi M. ; Mantella V. ; Schouwink P. ; Buonsanti R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12632. doi: 10.1002/anie.201905172
84	Wu J.-X. ; Hou S.-Z. ; Zhang X.-D. ; Xu M. ; Yang H.-F. ; Cao P.-S. ; Gu Z.-Y. Chem. Sci 2019, 10, 2199. doi: 10.1039/C8SC04344B
85	Cao C. ; Ma D. D. ; Gu J. F. ; Xie X. ; Zeng G. ; Li X. ; Han S. G. ; Zhu Q. L. ; Wu X. T. ; Xu Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 15014. doi: 10.1002/anie.202005577
86	Brezny A. C. ; Johnson S. I. ; Raugei S. ; Mayer J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 4108. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13654
87	Pegis M. L. ; Wise C. F. ; Martin D. J. ; Mayer J. M. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 2340. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00542
88	Zhao S. ; Yin H. ; Du L. ; He L. ; Zhao K. ; Chang L. ; Yin G. ; Zhao H. ; Liu S. ; Tang Z. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 12660. doi: 10.1021/nn505582e
89	Lai Q. ; Zheng L. ; Liang Y. ; He J. ; Zhao J. ; Chen J. ACS Catal 2017, 7, 1655. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02966
90	Guo J. ; Li Y. ; Cheng Y. ; Dai L. ; Xiang Z. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 8379. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03807
91	Yin P. ; Yao T. ; Wu Y. ; Zheng L. ; Lin Y. ; Liu W. ; Ju H. ; Zhu J. ; Hong X. ; Deng Z. ; et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10800. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604802
92	Liu X.-H. ; Hu W.-L. ; Jiang W.-J. ; Yang Y.-W. ; Niu S. ; Sun B. ; Wu J. ; Hu J.-S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 28473. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b07410
93	Yoon H. ; Lee S. ; Oh S. ; Park H. ; Choi S. ; Oh M. Small 2019, 15, 1805232. doi: 10.1002/smll.201805232
94	Chen G. ; Stevens M. B. ; Liu Y. ; King L. A. ; Park J. ; Kim T. R. ; Bao Z. ; Sinclair R. ; Jaramillo T. F. ; Bao Z. Small Methods 2020, 4, 2000085. doi: 10.1002/smtd.202000085
95	Roger I. ; Shipman M. A. ; Symes M. D. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 1. doi: 10.1038/s41570-016-0003
96	Chen W. ; Pei J. ; He C.-T. ; Wan J. ; Ren H. ; Wang Y. ; Dong J. ; Wu K. ; Cheong W.-C. ; Mao J. ;et al Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800396. doi: 10.1002/adma.201800396
97	Liu T. ; Li P. ; Yao N. ; Cheng G. ; Chen S. ; Luo W. ; Yin Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 306, 627. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901409
98	Duan J. ; Chen S. ; Zhao C. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15341. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15341
99	Zheng F. ; Zheng C. ; Gao X. ; Du C. ; Zhang Z. ; Chen W. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 7, 9743. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.175
100	Huang H. ; Zhao Y. ; Bai Y. ; Li F. ; Zhang Y. ; Chen Y. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2000012. doi: 10.1002/advs.202000012
101	Yang C. ; Zhu Y. ; Liu J. ; Qin Y. ; Wang H. ; Liu H. ; Chen Y. ; Zhang Z. ; Hu W. Nano Energy 2020, 77, 105126. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105126
102	Geng Z. ; Liu Y. ; Kong X. ; Li P. ; Li K. ; Liu Z. ; Du J. ; Shu M. ; Si R. ; Zeng J. Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 1803498. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803498
103	Guo C. ; Ran J. ; Vasileff A. ; Qiao S.-Z. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 45. doi: 10.1039/C7EE02220D
104	Yuan L. ; Wu Z. ; Jiang W. ; Tang T. ; Niu S. ; Hu J.-S. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 1376. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-2637-8
105	Abghoui Y. ; Garden A. L. ; Howalt J. G. ; Vegge T. ; Skúlason E. ACS Catal 2016, 6, 635. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01918
106	Fukushima T. ; Drisdell W. ; Yano J. ; Surendranath Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 10926. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06737
107	Cui Q. ; Qin G. ; Wang W. ; K. R G. ; Du A. ; Sun Q. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 14510. doi: 10.1039/C9TA02926E
108	Xiong W. ; Cheng X. ; Wang T. ; Luo Y. ; Feng J. ; Lu S. ; Asiri A. M. ; Li W. ; Jiang Z. ; Sun X. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 1008. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-2733-9
109	Zhou J. ; Dou Y. ; Zhou A. ; Guo R.-M. ; Zhao M.-J. ; Li J.-R. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602643. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201602643
110	Li M. ; Xia Z. ; Huang Y. ; Tao L. ; Chao Y. ; Yin K. ; Yang W. ; Yang W. ; Yu Y. ; Guo S. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1912049.
	李蒙刚; 夏仲泓; 黄雅荣; 陶璐; 晁玉广; 尹坤; 杨文秀; 杨微微; 于永生; 郭少军; 物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1912049. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912049
111	Zheng F. ; Zhang Z. ; Xiang D. ; Li P. ; Du C. ; Zhuang Z. ; Li X. ; Chen W. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2019, 555, 541. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.005
112	Shen J.-Q. ; Liao P.-Q. ; Zhou D.-D. ; He C.-T. ; Wu J.-X. ; Zhang W.-X. ; Zhang J.-P. ; Chen X.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 1778. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b12353
113	Wang L. ; Wu Y. ; Cao R. ; Ren L. ; Chen M. ; Feng X. ; Zhou J. ; Wang B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 16736. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b05375
114	Zhao S. ; Wang Y. ; Dong J. ; He C.-T. ; Yin H. ; An P. ; Zhao K. ; Zhang X. ; Gao C. ; Zhang L. ;et al Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16184. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.184
115	Lu X.-F. ; Liao P.-Q. ; Wang J.-W. ; Wu J.-X. ; Chen X.-W. ; He C.-T. ; Zhang J.-P. ; Li G.-R. ; Chen X.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8336. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b03125
116	Cao C. ; Ma D. D. ; Xu Q. ; Wu X. T. ; Zhu Q. L. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807418. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807418
117	Li X. ; Ma D. D. ; Cao C. ; Zou R. ; Xu Q. ; Wu X. T. ; Zhu Q. L. Small 2019, 15, 1902218. doi: 10.1002/smll.201902218
118	Zheng F. ; Zhang C. ; Gao X. ; Du C. ; Zhuang Z. ; Chen W. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 306, 627. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.175
119	Liu J. ; Zhu D. ; Guo C. ; Vasileff A. ; Qiao S.-Z. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700518. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700518
120	Zheng F. ; Zhang Z. ; Zhang C. ; Zhang C. ; Chen W. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 2495. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03295
121	Centi G. SmartMat 2020, e1005. doi: 10.1002/smm2.1005

Type	Catalyst	Electrolyte	Potential	FE	Ref.
CO₂RR	Fe_MOF-525 films	1.0 mol·L^-1 TBAPF₆ + 1 mol·L^-1 TFE	-1.3 V vs. NHE	∼100% (CO + H₂)	77
	HKUST-1 (Cu, Ru)	0.5 mol·L^-1 KHCO₃	-1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl	47.2% (alcohol)	80
	Al₂(OH)₂TCPP-Co	0.5 mol·L^-1 potassium carbonate	-0.7 V vs. RHE	76% (CO)	82
	Ag@Al-PMOFs	0.1 mol·L^-1 KHCO₃	-1.1 V vs. RHE	55.8% (CO)	83
	Cu₂(CuTCPP)	0.5 mol·L^-1 EMIMBF₄	-1.55 V vs. Ag/Ag⁺	68.4% (formate); 16.8% (acetate)	84
	bismuthine (Bi-ene)	1 mol·L^-1 KOH	-0.57V vs. RHE	99.8% (formate)	85
ORR	Ni₃(HITP)₂	0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH	∼0.75 V vs. RHE	63% (H₂O₂)	27
	(Co)PCN222	0.1 mol·L^-1 HClO₄	0.43V vs. RHE		94
NRR	Mo₃(HAB)₂		0.18 V		107
	Co₃(HHTP)₂	0.5 mol·L^-1 LiClO₄	–0.40 V vs. RHE	3.34%	108
OER	{Fe₃(μ₃-O)(bdc)₃}₄{Co₂(na)₄(L^T)₂}₃	water at pH = 13	225 mV		112
	Fe/Ni-BTC	0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH	270 mV	95%	113
	NiCo-UMOFNs	1.0 mol·L^-1 KOH	∼189 mV	99.3%	114
	MAF-X27-OH(Cu)	1.0 mol·L^-1 KOH	292 mV	100%	115
	NiFe-NFF	1.0 mol·L^-1 KOH	227 mV	~100%	116
	NiFe MOF/OM-NFH	1.0 mol·L^-1 KOH	270 mV		117
HER	NiFe-MOF	0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH	240 mV		98
	Pd@MOF-74	0.5 mol·L^-1 H₂SO₄	-0.106 V vs. RHE		99
	Ni₃(Ni₃·HAHATN)₂	0.1 mol·L^-1 KOH	115 mV		100

[1]	段欣漩, Sendeku Marshet Getaye, 张道明, 周道金, 徐立军, 高学庆, 陈爱兵, 邝允, 孙晓明. 钨掺杂镍铁水滑石高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303055 - .
[2]	徐涵煜, 宋雪旦, 张青, 于畅, 邱介山. 理论研究Cu@C₂N催化剂表面上水分子对电催化CO₂还原反应机理的影响[J]. 物理化学学报, 2024, 40(1): 2303040 - .
[3]	王宁, 李一, 崔乾, 孙晓玥, 胡悦, 罗运军, 杜然. 金属气凝胶：可控制备与应用展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212014 -0 .
[4]	胡荣, 韦丽云, 鲜靖林, 房光钰, 吴植傲, 樊淼, 郭家越, 李青翔, 刘凯思, 姜会钰, 徐卫林, 万骏, 姚永刚. 微波热冲快速制备二维多孔La_0.2Sr_0.8CoO₃钙钛矿用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212025 -0 .
[5]	夏伟锋, 季成宇, 王锐, 裘式纶, 方千荣. 基于四硫富瓦烯的无金属共价有机框架材料用于高效电催化析氧反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(9): 2212057 -0 .
[6]	陈瑶, 陈存, 曹雪松, 王震宇, 张楠, 刘天西. CO₂和N₂电还原中缺陷及界面工程的最新进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2212053 -0 .
[7]	兰畅, 楚宇逸, 王烁, 刘长鹏, 葛君杰, 邢巍. 质子交换膜燃料电池阴极非贵金属M-N_x/C型氧还原催化剂研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210036 -0 .
[8]	于彦会, 饶鹏, 封苏阳, 陈民, 邓培林, 李静, 苗政培, 康振烨, 沈义俊, 田新龙. 钴原子团簇用于高效氧还原反应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 2210039 -0 .
[9]	杨帅, 徐瑜歆, 郝子坤, 秦胜建, 张润鹏, 韩钰, 杜利伟, 朱紫洢, 杜安宁, 陈欣, 吴昊, 乔冰冰, 李坚, 王艺, 孙昺晨, 闫融融, 赵晋津. 高效医学传感钙钛矿材料研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2211025 -0 .
[10]	荣佑文, 桑佳琪, 车丽, 高敦峰, 汪国雄. 二氧化碳电催化还原中的电解质效应[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(5): 2212027 -0 .
[11]	卢尔君, 陶俊乾, 阳灿, 侯乙东, 张金水, 王心晨, 付贤智. 碳包覆Pd/TiO₂光催化产氢协同胺类选择性氧化合成亚胺[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2211029 -0 .
[12]	王奥琦, 陈军, 张鹏飞, 唐珊, 冯兆池, 姚婷婷, 李灿. NiMo(O)物相结构与电解水析氢反应活性的关联[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2301023 -0 .
[13]	许义飞, 杨瀚文, 常晓侠, 徐冰君. 电催化动力学简介[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(4): 2210025 -0 .
[14]	胡洋, 刘斌, 徐路遥, 董自强, 仵亚婷, 刘杰, 钟澄, 胡文彬. 基于微流控技术平台的Pt基三元电催化剂高通量合成和筛选[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(3): 2209004 -0 .
[15]	徐斯然, 吴奇, 卢帮安, 唐堂, 张佳楠, 胡劲松. “绿氢”工业化碱性催化剂研究现状及未来展望[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(2): 2209001 -0 .

导电金属有机框架材料在电催化中的成就，挑战和机遇

Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalysis:Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 121

相关文章 15

Metrics

推荐阅读 0